XML 39 R23.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.8.0.1

NON-CONSOLIDATED VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES AND SERVICING ASSETS | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Dec. 31, 2017
NON-CONSOLIDATED VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES AND SERVICING ASSETS [Text Block] | NOTE 16 – NON CONSOLIDATED VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES AND SERVICING ASSETS The Corporation transfers residential mortgage loans in sale or securitization transactions in which it has continuing involvement, including servicing responsibilities and guarantee arrangements. All such transfers have been accounted for as sales as required by applicable accounting guidance. When evaluating the need to consolidate counterparties to which the Corporation has transferred assets or with which the Corpor ation has entered into other transactions, the Corporation first determines if the counterparty is an entity for which a variable interest exists. If no scope exception is applicable and a variable interest exists, the Corporation then evaluates if it is t he primary beneficiary of the VIE and whether the entity should be consolidated or not. Below is a summary of transfers of financial assets to VIEs for which the Corporation has retained some level of continuing involvement: GNMA The Corporation typical ly transfers first lien residential mortgage loans in conjunction with GNMA securitization transactions in which the loans are exchanged for cash or securities that are readily redeemed for cash proceeds and servicing rights. The securities issued through these transactions are guaranteed by the issuer and, as such, under seller/servicer agreements, the Corporation is required to service the loans in accordance with the issuers’ servicing guidelines and standards. As of December 31, 2017, the Corporati on serviced loans securitized through GNMA with a principal balance of $1.6 billion. Trust Preferred Securities In 2004, FBP Statutory Trust I, a financing trust that is wholly owned by the Corporation, sold to institutional investors $100 million of its variable-rate trust-preferred securities. The proceeds of the issuance, together with the proceeds of the purchase by the Corporation of $3.1 million of FBP Statutory Trust I variable-rate common securities, were used by FBP Statutory Trust I to purchase $103.1 million aggregate principal amount of the Corporation’s Junior Subordinated Deferrable Debentures. Also in 2004, FBP Statutory Trust II, a financing trust that is wholly owned by the Corporation, sold to institutional investors $125 million of its v ariable-rate trust-preferred securities. The proceeds of the issuance, together with the proceeds of the purchase by the Corporation of $3.9 million of FBP Statutory Trust II variable-rate common securities, were used by FBP Statutory Trust II to purchase $128.9 million aggregate principal amount of the Corporation’s Junior Subordinated Deferrable Debentures. The debentures are presented in the Corporation’s consolidated statement s of financial condition as Other Borrowings, net of related issuance costs. T he variable-rate trust-preferred securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Corporation. The Junior Subordinated Deferrable Debentures issued by the Corporation in April 2004 and in September 2004 mature on June 17, 2034 and September 20, 2 034, respectively; however, under certain circumstances, the maturity of Junior Subordinated Deferrable Debentures may be shortened (such shortening would result in a mandatory redemption of the variable rate trust-preferred securities). During the third quarter of 2017, the Corporation completed the repurchase of $7.3 million of trust preferred securities of the FBP Statutory Trust I that were offered to the Corporation by an investment banking firm. The Corporation repurchased and cancelled the repurchased trust preferred securities, resulting in a commensurate reduction in the related Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Debenture. The Corporation’s purchase price equated to 81% of the $7.3 million par value. The 19% discount, plus accrued interest, resulted in a gain of approximately $1.4 million, which is reflected in the consolidated statement of income as a “Gain on early extinguishment of debt.” In a separate transaction, d uring the first quarter of 2016, the Corporation completed the repurchas e of $10 million of trust-preferred securities of the FBP Statutory Trust II that were auctioned in a public sale at which the Corporation was invited to participate. The Corporation repurchased and cancelled the repurchased trust-preferred securities, res ulting in a commensurate reduction in the related Junior Subordinated Deferrable Debentures. The Corporation’s winning bid equated to 70% of the $10 million par value. The 30% discount, plus accrued interest, resulted in a gain of approximately $4.2 millio n, which is also reflected in the consolidated statement of income as a “Gain on early extinguishment of debt.” During the second quarter of 2015, the Corporation issued 852,831 shares of the Corporation’s common stock in exchange for $5.3 million of trust-preferred sec urities (FBP Statutory Trust I), which enabled the Corporation to cancel $5.5 million of the carrying value of the debentures underlying the purchased trust-preferred securities. The Collins Amendment to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform an d Consumer Protection Act eliminates certain trust-preferred securities from Tier 1 Capital; however, these instruments may remain in Tier 2 capital until the instruments are redeemed or mature. Under the indentures, the Corporation has the right, from tim e to time, and without causing an event of default, to defer payments of interest on the Junior Subordinated Deferrable Debentures by extending the interest payment period at any time and from time to time during the term of the subordinated debentures for up to twenty consecutive quarterly periods. During the second quarter of 2016, the Corporation received approval from the Federal Reserve and paid $31.2 million for all of the accrued but deferred interest payments plus the interest for the second quarter of 2016 on the Corporation’s subordinated debentures associated with its trust preferred securities. Subsequently, the Corporation has received quarterly approvals and made scheduled quarterly interest payments. As of December 31, 2017, the Corporation i s current on all interest payments due on its subordinated debt. On October 2017, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York terminated the formal written agreement (the “Written Agreement”) entered into on June 3, 2010 between the Corporation and the Reserve Ba nk. However, the Corporation has agreed with the its regulators to continue to obtain approval before paying dividends, receiving dividends from the Bank, making payment s on subordinated debt or trust-preferred securities, incurring or guaranteeing debt or purchasing or r edeeming any corporate stock. The Corporation has already received approval to make the subordinated debentures quarterly payment for March 31, 2018. During the first quarter of 2018, the Corporation re purchased $23.8 million in trust-preferr ed securities that had been issued by FBP Statutory Trust II. The transaction is described in more detail in Note 3 6 – Subsequent Events. Grantor Trusts During 2004 and 2005, an unaffiliated party, referred to in this subsection as the seller, established a series of statutory trusts to effect the securitization of mortgage loans and the sale of trust certificates. The seller initially provided the servicing for a fee, which is senior to the obligations to pay trust certificate holders. The sell er then entered into a sales agreement through which it sold and issued the trust certificates in favor of the Corporation’s banking subsidiary. Currently, the Bank is the sole owner of the trust certificates; the servicing of the underlying residential mo rtgages that generate the principal and interest cash flows is performed by another third party, which receives a servicing fee. The securities are variable rate securities indexed to 90-day LIBOR plus a spread. The principal payments from the underlying l oans are remitted to a paying agent (servicer), who then remits interest to the Bank; interest income is shared to a certain extent with the FDIC, which has an interest only strip (“IO”) tied to the cash flo ws of the underlying loans and is entitled to rec eive the excess of the interest income less a servicing fee over the variable rate income that the Bank earns on the securities. This IO is limited to the weighted-average coupon on the securities. The FDIC beca me the owner of the IO upon its intervention of the seller, a failed financial institution. No recourse agreement exists and the risk s from losses on non-accruing loans and repossessed collateral are absorbed by the Bank as the sole holder of the certificates. As of December 31, 2017, the amort ized cost and fair value of the Grantor Trusts amounted to $22.8 million and $17.1 million, respectively, with a weighted-average yield of 2.44%. Investment in unconsolidated entity On February 16, 2011, FirstBank sold an asset portfolio consisting of pe rforming and non-performing construction, commercial mortgage and commercial and industrial loans with an aggregate book value of $269.3 million to CPG/GS, an entity organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and majority owned by PRLP Ven tures LLC ("PRLP"), a company created by Goldman, Sachs & Co. and Caribbean Property Group. In connection with the sale, the Corporation received $88.5 million in cash and a 35% interest in CPG/GS, and made a loan in the amount of $136.1 million represent ing seller financing provided by FirstBank. The loan ha s a seven-year maturity bears variable interest at 30-day LIBOR plus 300 basis points and is secured by a pledge of all of the acquiring entity's assets as well as PRLP's 65% ownership interest in CPG/GS. As of December 31, 2017, the carrying amount of the loan was $4.0 million, which was included in the Corporation's c ommercial and industrial loans held-for-investment portfolio. FirstBank’s equity interest in CPG/GS is accounted for under the equi ty method. When applying the equity method, the Bank follows the Hypothetical Liquidation Book Value method (“HLBV”) to determine its share of CPG/GS’s earnings or loss. The loss recorded in 2014 reduced to zero the carrying amount of the Bank’s investment in CPG/GS. No negative investment needs to be reported as the Bank has no legal obligation or commitment to provide further financial support to this entity; thus, no further losses have been or will be recorded on this investment. Any potential increase in the carrying value of the investment i n CPG/GS, under the HLBV method would depend upon how better off the Bank is at the end of the period than it was at the beginning of the period after the waterfall calculation performed to determine the amount of g ain allocated to the investors. FirstBank also provided an $80 million advance facility to CPG/GS to fund unfunded commitments and costs to complete projects under construction, which was fully disbursed in 2011, and a $20 million working capital line of credit to fund certain expenses of CPG/GS. The working capital line expired in September 2016. During 2012, CPG/GS repaid the outstanding balance of the advance facility to fund unfunded commitments, and the funds became av ailable for rewithdrawal under a one-time revolver agreement. This facility loan bear s variable interest at 30-day LIBOR plus 300 basis points. As of December 31, 2017, the carrying value of the revolver agreeme nt was $6.7 million, which was included in the Corporation's commercial and industrial loan s held for investment portfolio. Cash proceeds received by CPG/GS have been first used to cover operating expenses and debt service payments, including those related to the note receivable and the advance facility described above, which must be substantially repaid before proceeds can be used for other purposes, including the return of capital to both PRLP and FirstBank. FirstBank will not receive any return on its equity interest until PRLP receives an ag gregate amount equivalent to its initial investment and a priority return of at least 12%, resulting in FirstBank’s interest in CPG/GS being subordinate to PRLP’s interest. CPG/GS will then begin to make payments pro rata to PRLP and FirstBank, 35% and 65%, respectively, until FirstBank has achieved a 12% return on its invested capital and the aggregate amount of distributions is equal to FirstBank’s capital contributions to CPG/GS. The Bank has determined that CPG/GS is a VIE in which the Bank is not the primary beneficiary. In determining the primary beneficiary of CPG/GS, the Bank considered applicable guidance that requires the Bank to qualitatively assess the determination of the primary beneficiary (or consolidator) of CPG/GS based on whether it has both the power to direct the activities of CPG/GS that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of CPG/GS that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the ent ity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The Bank determined that it does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of CPG/GS as it does not have the right to manage the loan portfolio, impact foreclosure proceedings, or manage the construction and sale of the property; therefore, the Bank concluded that it is not the primary beneficiary of CPG/GS. Servicing Assets The Corporation sells residential mortgage loans to GNMA, which generally securitizes the transferred loans into mortgage-backed securities. Also, certain conventional conforming loans are sold to FNMA or FHLMC with servicing retained. The Corporation recognizes as separate assets the rights to service loans for others, whether those servicing assets are originated or purchased.
| The changes in servicing assets for the indicated years are shown below:
|  | Year Ended December 31,
|  | 2017 |  | 2016 |  | 2015
| (In thousands) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Balance at beginning of year | $ | 26,244 |  | $ | 24,282 |  | $ | 22,838
| Capitalization of servicing assets |  | 3,318 |  |  | 5,260 |  |  | 4,919
| Amortization |  | (3,091) |  |  | (3,229) |  |  | (3,159)
| Adjustment to fair value |  | (1,611) |  |  | (325) |  |  | (228)
| Other (1) |  | 395 |  |  | 256 |  |  | (88)
| Balance at end of year | $ | 25,255 |  | $ | 26,244 |  | $ | 24,282
(1) | Amount represents the adjustment to fair value related to the repurchase of loans serviced for others.
Impairment charges are recognized through a valuation allowance for each individual stratum of servicing assets. The valuation allowance is adjusted to reflect the amount, if any, by which the cost basis of the servicing asset for a given stratum of loans being serviced exceeds its fair value. Any fair value in excess of the cost basis of the servicing asset for a given stratum is not recognized.
Changes in the impairment allowance were as follows:
| Year ended December 31,
| 2017 |  | 2016 |  | 2015
(In thousands) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Balance at beginning of year | $ | 461 |  | $ | 136 |  | $ | 55
Temporary impairment charges |  | 1,611 |  |  | 466 |  |  | 285
OTTI of servicing assets |  | (621) |  |  | - |  |  | (147)
Recoveries |  | - |  |  | (141) |  |  | (57)
Balance at end of year | $ | 1,451 |  | $ | 461 |  | $ | 136
The components of net servicing income are shown below:
| Year ended December 31,
| 2017 |  | 2016 |  | 2015
(In thousands) |  |
Servicing fees | $ | 7,630 |  | $ | 7,606 |  | $ | 7,211
Late charges and prepayment penalties |  | 405 |  |  | 674 |  |  | 765
Adjustment for loans repurchased |  | 395 |  |  | 256 |  |  | (88)
Other (1) |  | (35) |  |  | (1) |  |  | (161)
Servicing income, gross |  | 8,395 |  |  | 8,535 |  |  | 7,727
Amortization and impairment of servicing assets |  | (4,702) |  |  | (3,554) |  |  | (3,387)
Servicing income, net | $ | 3,693 |  | $ | 4,981 |  | $ | 4,340
(1) Mainly consisted of compensatory fees imposed by GSEs.
The Corporation’s servicing assets are subject to prepayment and interest rate risks. Key economic assumptions used in determining the fair value at the time of the sale of the related mortgages ranged as follows: |  |
| Maximum |  | Minimum |  |  |  |
2017: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Constant prepayment rate: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Government-guaranteed mortgage loans | 6.2 | % |  | 6.0 | % |  |  |  |
Conventional conforming mortgage loans | 6.7 | % |  | 6.3 | % |  |  |  |
Conventional non-conforming mortgage loans | 9.5 | % |  | 9.1 | % |  |  |  |
Discount rate: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Government-guaranteed mortgage loans | 12.0 | % |  | 12.0 | % |  |  |  |
Conventional conforming mortgage loans | 10.0 | % |  | 10.0 | % |  |  |  |
Conventional non-conforming mortgage loans | 14.3 | % |  | 14.3 | % |  |  |  |
2016: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Constant prepayment rate: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Government-guaranteed mortgage loans | 7.6 | % |  | 5.9 | % |  |  |  |
Conventional conforming mortgage loans | 8.0 | % |  | 6.3 | % |  |  |  |
Conventional non-conforming mortgage loans | 14.1 | % |  | 9.3 | % |  |  |  |
Discount rate: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Government-guaranteed mortgage loans | 12.0 | % |  | 11.5 | % |  |  |  |
Conventional conforming mortgage loans | 10.0 | % |  | 9.5 | % |  |  |  |
Conventional non-conforming mortgage loans | 14.3 | % |  | 13.8 | % |  |  |  |
2015: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Constant prepayment rate: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Government-guaranteed mortgage loans | 9.2 | % |  | 7.8 | % |  |  |  |
Conventional conforming mortgage loans | 9.0 | % |  | 7.9 | % |  |  |  |
Conventional non-conforming mortgage loans | 14.4 | % |  | 12.9 | % |  |  |  |
Discount rate: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Government-guaranteed mortgage loans | 11.5 | % |  | 11.5 | % |  |  |  |
Conventional conforming mortgage loans | 9.5 | % |  | 9.5 | % |  |  |  |
Conventional non-conforming mortgage loans | 13.8 | % |  | 13.8 | % |  |  |  |
The weighted-averages of the key economic assumptions used by the Corporation in its valuation model and the sensitivity of the current fair value to immediate 10% and 20% adverse changes in those assumptions for mortgage loans as of December 31, 2017 were as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) |
Carrying amount of servicing assets | $ | 25,255 |
Fair value | $ | 29,368 |
Weighted-average expected life (in years) |  | 8.23 |
Constant prepayment rate (weighted-average annual rate) |  | 6.30 | %
Decrease in fair value due to 10% adverse change | $ | 746 |
Decrease in fair value due to 20% adverse change | $ | 1,460 |
Discount rate (weighted-average annual rate) |  | 11.23 | %
Decrease in fair value due to 10% adverse change | $ | 1,234 |
Decrease in fair value due to 20% adverse change | $ | 2,365 |
These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value based on a 10% variation in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship between the change in assumption and the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in this table, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the servicing asset is calculated without changing any other assumption; in reality, changes in one factor may resul t in changes in another (for example, increases in market interest rates may result in lower prepayments), which may magnify or counteract the sensitivities.

X
- Definition Information about variable interest entities, investments accounted under the equity method and includes the entire disclosure related to mortgage servicing rights. + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | fbp_NonConsolidatedVariableInterestEntitiesAndServicingAssetsTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | fbp_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration