XML 29 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2017
Recent Accounting Pronouncements [Abstract]  
Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Note 11. Recent Accounting Pronouncements



In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”.  This ASU establishes a comprehensive revenue recognition standard for virtually all industries utilizing U.S. GAAP, including those that previously followed industry-specific guidance such as the real estate and construction industries.  The revenue standard’s core principle is built on the contract between a vendor and a customer for the provision of goods and services.  It attempts to depict the exchange of rights and obligations between the parties in the pattern of revenue recognition based on the consideration to which the vendor is entitled.  To accomplish this, the standard requires five basic steps: (i) identify the contract with the customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (iii) identify the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies the performance obligation.  Three basic transition methods are available - full retrospective, retrospective with certain practical expedients, and a cumulative effect approach.  We plan to adopt the standard using the cumulative effect approach.  Under the cumulative effect alternative, an entity would apply the new revenue standard only to contracts that are incomplete under legacy U.S. GAAP at the date of initial application and recognize the cumulative effect of the new standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings.  The guidance in this ASU is effective for annual periods and interim reporting periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017.  Since the standard does not apply to revenue from loans, securities and other financial instruments, based on our evaluation to date, we do not expect the adoption of this standard to have a significant impact on our consolidated results of operations or our consolidated financial position.  We are still evaluating the presentation of certain in-scope revenue on the income statement related to our payments business. We have commenced a  contract review for those in-scope revenue streams. The Company’s contracts with its various third parties generally do not entail significant amounts of deferred revenues. Instead, services are performed monthly and amounts are billed either monthly or quarterly. Nonetheless, the Company is in process of conducting  a review of its contracts and sources of income to ascertain that the standard will not have a material impact on the consolidated statement of operations or financial position. The review will include the non interest income producing categories of the Company which include prepaid cards, merchant acquiring, ACH, service fees on deposit accounts, gains and losses on other real estate owned, gains and losses on the sale of loans and other categories.    



In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-14, “Receivables - Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors (Subtopic 310-40): Classification of Certain Government-Guaranteed Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure”.  The guidance in this ASU affects creditors that hold government-guaranteed mortgage loans, including those guaranteed by the Federal Home Administration (FHA) and the Veterans Administration (VA).  It requires that a mortgage loan be derecognized and a separate other receivable be recognized upon foreclosure if the following conditions are met:



1.

The loan has a government guarantee that is not separable from the loan before foreclosure.

2.

At the time of foreclosure, the creditor has the intent to convey the real estate property to the guarantor and make a claim on the guarantee, and the creditor has the ability to recover under the claim.

3.

At the time of foreclosure, any amount of the claim that is determined on the basis of the fair value of the real estate is fixed.

This standard did not have a significant impact on our consolidated results of operations or our consolidated financial position.



In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-11, “Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10) Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”.   This ASU revises an entity’s accounting related to the classification and measurement of investments in equity securities and the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value.  It also amends certain disclosure requirements associated with the fair value of financial instruments.  For public business entities, the amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years.  The Company is currently assessing the impact that the adoption of this standard will have on the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases”.  The FASB issued this ASU to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet by lessees for those leases classified as operating leases under current U.S. GAAP and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements.  The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2018.  Early application of this ASU is permitted for all entities.  The Company is currently assessing the impact that the adoption of this standard will have on the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Compensation-Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting”.  This ASU simplifies several areas of accounting for share based payment award transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and the classification on the statement of cash flows. For public companies, this is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and the interim periods within those annual periods.  The Company adopted the guidance in the first quarter of 2017, and the adoption did not have a material impact on first quarter results.



In September 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments-Update”.  The Update changes the accounting for credit losses on loans and debt securities.  For loans and held-to-maturity debt securities, the Update requires an expected credit loss model to determine the allowance for credit losses.  The expected credit loss model estimates losses for the estimated life of the financial asset.    Expected credit losses reflect losses over the remaining contractual life of an asset, considering the effect of voluntary prepayments and considering available information about the collectability of cash flows, including information about past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts.  The resulting allowance for credit losses reflects the portion of the amortized cost basis that the entity does not expect to collect.  Additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures are required upon adoption.  In addition, the Update modifies the other-than-temporary impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities to require an allowance for credit impairment instead of a direct write-down, which allows for reversal of credit impairments in future periods.  The guidance is effective in the first quarter of 2020 with a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the year of adoption.  Early adoption is permitted beginning in the first quarter of 2019. The Company is evaluating the impact the Update will have on the consolidated financial statements.