XML 23 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.1.900
Fair Value Measurement
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2015
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurement
Fair Value Measurement

The Company measures certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined using assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The Company establishes a three-level hierarchy to prioritize the inputs used in measuring fair value. The levels are described in the below with level 1 having the highest priority and level 3 having the lowest:
Level 1 - Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets
Level 2 - Inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the Company to develop its own assumptions
The following table provide a summary of the assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):

Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
December 31, 2015
 
 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
 
Total
 
(Level 1)
 
(Level 2)
 
(Level 3)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash equivalents (1)
$
3,015

 
$

 
$
3,015

 
$

Short-term investments (2)
92,775

 
6,786

 
85,989

 

Note receivable Viking (3)
4,782

 

 

 
4,782

     Total assets
$
100,572

 
$
6,786

 
$
89,004

 
$
4,782

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current contingent liabilities - CyDex (4)
$
7,812

 
$

 
$

 
$
7,812

Current contingent liabilities-Metabasis (5)
$
2,602

 

 
2,602

 

Long-term contingent liabilities - Metabasis (5)
1,355

 

 
1,355

 

Long-term contingent liabilities - CyDex (4)
1,678

 

 

 
1,678

Liability for amounts owed to former licensees (6)
794

 
794

 

 

     Total liabilities
$
14,241

 
$
794

 
$
3,957

 
$
9,490


Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
December 31, 2014
 
 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs *
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
 
Total
 
(Level 1)
 
(Level 2)
 
(Level 3)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash equivalents (1)
$

 
 
 
 
 
 
Current co-promote termination payments receivable (7)
$
322

 
$

 
$

 
$
322

Short-term investments (2)
7,133

 
7,133

 

 

     Total assets
$
7,455

 
$
7,133

 
$

 
$
322

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current contingent liabilities - CyDex (4)
$
6,796

 
$

 
$

 
$
6,796

Current co-promote termination liability (7)
322

 

 

 
322

Long-term contingent liabilities - Metabasis (5)
3,652

 

 
3,652

 

Long-term contingent liabilities - CyDex (4)
4,701

 

 

 
4,701

Liability for amounts owed to former licensees (6)
773

 
773

 

 

     Total liabilities
$
16,244

 
$
773


$
3,652


$
11,819


*Adjusted to correct an error in disclosure that was deemed immaterial to the financial statements taken as a whole. Contingent liabilities related to Metabasis were reclassified from Level 1 to Level 2 as market is deemed inactive. Additionally, certain certificates of deposit with maturities less than 90 days were not previously disclosed in the table above.

(1) Highly liquid investments with maturities less than 90 days from the purchase date are recorded as cash equivalents that are classified as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, as these investment securities are valued based upon quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.

(2) Investments in equity securities, are classified as level 1 as the fair value is determined using quoted market prices in active markets for the same securities. Short-term investments in marketable securities with maturities greater than 90 days are classified as level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, as these investment securities are valued based upon quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.

(3) The fair value of the convertible note receivable from Viking was determined using a probability weighted option pricing model using a lattice methodology. The fair value is subjective and is affected by certain significant input to the valuation model such as the estimated volatility of the common stock, which was estimated to be 65% at December 31, 2015. Changes in these assumptions may materially affect the fair value estimate. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company reported a decrease in the fair value of the Viking convertible notes of $0.8 million in "Other, net" of the consolidated statement of operations.
    
(4) The fair value of the liabilities for CyDex contingent liabilities were determined based on the income approach using a Monte Carlo analysis. The fair value is subjective and is affected by changes in inputs to the valuation model including management’s assumptions regarding revenue volatility, probability of commercialization of products, estimates of timing and probability of achievement of certain revenue thresholds and developmental and regulatory milestones which may be achieved and affect amounts owed to former license holders and CVR holders. Changes in these assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate.

(5) The liability for CVRs for Metabasis are determined using quoted market prices in an inactive market for the
underlying CVR.

(6) The liability for amounts owed to former licensees are determined using quoted market prices in active markets for the underlying investment received from a partner, a portion of which is owed to former licensees.

(7) The co-promote termination payments receivable represents a receivable for future payments to be made by Pfizer related to product sales and is recorded at its fair value. The receivable and liability will remain equal. The fair value is determined based on a valuation model using an income approach.

The following table represents significant unobservable inputs used in determining the fair value of contingent liabilities assumed in the acquisition of CyDex:

 
 
December 31,
 
 
2015
 
2014
Range of annual revenue subject to revenue sharing (1)
 
$22.5 million
 
$17.2 million-$17.3 million
Revenue volatility
 
25%
 
25%
Average of probability of commercialization
 
73%
 
81%
Sales beta
 
0.40
 
0.60
Credit rating
 
BB
 
B
Equity risk premium
 
6%
 
6%
(1)
Revenue subject to revenue sharing represent management’s estimate of the range of total annual revenue subject to revenue sharing (i.e. annual revenues in excess of $15 million) through December 31, 2016, which is the term of the CVR agreement.

A reconciliation of the level 3 financial instruments as of December 31, 2015 is as follows (in thousands):

Assets:
 
Fair value of level 3 financial instruments as of December 31, 2014
$
322

Assumed payments made by Pfizer or assignee
(390
)
Fair value adjustments to co-promote termination liability
68

Note receivable Viking
4,782

Fair value of level 3 financial instrument assets as of December 31, 2015
$
4,782

 
 
Liabilities
 
Fair value of level 3 financial instruments as of December 31, 2014
$
11,819

Assumed payments made by Pfizer or assignee
(390
)
Payments to CVR holders and other contingency payments
(5,848
)
Fair value adjustments to contingent liabilities
3,841

Fair value adjustments to co-promote termination liability
68

Fair value of level 3 financial instruments as of December 31, 2015
$
9,490



Other Fair Value Measurements-2019 Convertible Senior Notes

In August 2014, the Company issued the 2019 Convertible Senior Notes. The Company uses a quoted market rate in an inactive market, which is classified as a Level 2 input, to estimate the current fair value of its 2019 Convertible Senior Notes. The estimated fair value of the 2019 Senior Convertible Notes was $377.9 million as of December 31, 2015. The carrying value of the notes does not reflect the market rate. See Note 7 Financing Arrangements for additional information.

Viking

The Company records its investment in Viking under the equity method of accounting. The investment is subsequently adjusted for the Company’s share of Viking's operating results, and if applicable, cash contributions and distributions. See Note 2 Investment in Viking for additional information. The market value of the Company's investment in Viking was $16.3 million as of December 31, 2015. The carrying value of the investment in Viking does not reflect the market value.