XML 20 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Fair Value Measurements
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2016
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Measurements

The Company measures certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined using assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The Company establishes a three-level hierarchy to prioritize the inputs used in measuring fair value. The levels are described below with level 1 having the highest level input that is significant to the measurement and level 3 having the lowest:
Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets;
Level 2 - Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, or quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or Inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly; and
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the Company to develop its own assumptions.    
The following table provides a summary of the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2016 (in thousands). There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 securities during the nine months ended September 30, 2016:

Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
 
 
 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
 
Total
 
(Level 1)
 
(Level 2)
 
(Level 3)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Short-term investments (2)
$
37,535

 
$
4,539

 
$
32,996

 
$

Note receivable Viking (3)
3,207

 

 

 
3,207

Investment in warrants (4)
684

 
684

 

 

     Total assets
$
41,426

 
$
5,223

 
$
32,996

 
$
3,207

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current contingent liabilities-CyDex (5)
$
5,079

 
$

 
$

 
$
5,079

Long-term contingent liabilities-CyDex (5)
1,634

 

 

 
1,634

Long-term contingent liabilities-Metabasis (6)
2,299

 

 
2,299

 

Liability for amounts owed to former licensees(7)
536

 
536

 

 

     Total liabilities
$
9,548

 
$
536

 
$
2,299

 
$
6,713


The following table provides a summary of the assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2015 (in thousands):

Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
 
 
 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs *
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
 
Total
 
(Level 1)
 
(Level 2)
 
(Level 3)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash equivalents (1)
$
3,015

 
$

 
$
3,015

 
$

Short-term investments (2)
92,775

 
6,786

 
85,989

 

Viking note receivable (3)
4,782

 

 

 
4,782

     Total assets
$
100,572

 
$
6,786

 
$
89,004

 
$
4,782

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current contingent liabilities-CyDex (5)
$
7,812

 
$

 
$

 
$
7,812

Current contingent liabilities-Metabasis (6)
2,602

 

 
2,602

 

Long-term contingent liabilities-Metabasis (6)
1,355

 

 
1,355

 

Long-term contingent liabilities-CyDex (5)
1,678

 

 

 
1,678

Liability for amounts owed to former licensees (7)
794

 
794

 

 

     Total liabilities
$
14,241

 
$
794

 
$
3,957

 
$
9,490



(1)
Highly liquid investments with maturities less than 90 days from the purchase date are recorded as cash equivalents that are classified as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, as these investment securities are valued based upon quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market. 
(2)
Investments in equity securities, which the Company received as a result of event-based and upfront payments from licensees, are classified as level 1 as the fair value is determined using quoted market prices in active markets for the same securities. Short-term investments in marketable securities with maturities greater than 90 days are classified as level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, as these investment securities are valued based upon quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market. 
(3)
The fair value of the convertible note receivable from Viking was determined using a probability weighted option pricing model using a lattice methodology. The fair value is subjective and is affected by certain significant input to the valuation model such as the estimated volatility of the common stock, which was estimated to be 75% at September 30, 2016. Changes in these assumptions may materially affect the fair value estimate.
(4)
Investment in warrants, which the Company received as a result of Viking’s partial repayment of the Viking note receivable and the Company’s purchase of Viking common stock and warrants in April 2016, are classified as level 1 as the fair value is determined using quoted market prices in active markets for the same securities.
(5)
The fair value of the liabilities for CyDex contingent liabilities were determined based on the income approach. To the extent the estimated future income may vary significantly given the long-term nature of the estimate, the Company utilizes a Monte Carlo model. The fair value is subjective and is affected by changes in inputs to the valuation model including management’s estimates of timing and probability of achievement of certain revenue thresholds and developmental and regulatory milestones which may be achieved and affect amounts owed to former license holders and CVR holders. Changes in these assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate.
(6)
The liability for CVRs for Metabasis are determined using quoted prices in an market that is not active for the underlying CVR.
(7)
The liability for amounts owed to former licensees are determined using quoted market prices in active markets for the underlying investment received from a partner, a portion of which is owed to former licensees.

The following table represents significant unobservable inputs used in determining the fair value of contingent liabilities assumed in the acquisition of CyDex:

 
September 30, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
Annual revenue subject to revenue sharing (1)
$28.0 million
 
$22.5 million
Revenue volatility
25%
 
25%
Average probability
92%
 
73%
Sales beta
0.30
 
0.40
Credit rating
BB
 
BB
Equity risk premium
6%
 
6%
(1)
Revenue subject to revenue sharing represent management’s estimate of the total annual revenue subject to revenue sharing (i.e. annual revenues in excess of $15 million) through December 31, 2016, which is the term of the CVR agreement.

A reconciliation of the level 3 financial instruments as of September 30, 2016 is as follows (in thousands):

Assets:
 
Fair value of level 3 financial instrument assets as of December 31, 2015
$
4,782

Viking note receivable fair market value adjustment
(215
)
Cash payment received as partial repayment of note receivable
(300
)
Fair market value of stock received as partial repayment of note receivable
(1,060
)
Fair value of level 3 financial instrument assets as of September 30, 2016
$
3,207

 
 
Liabilities:
 
Fair value of level 3 financial instrument liabilities as of December 31, 2015
$
9,490

Payments to CVR and other former license holders
(4,413
)
Fair value adjustments to contingent liabilities
1,636

Fair value of level 3 financial instrument liabilities as of September 30, 2016
$
6,713




Other Fair Value Measurements

2019 Convertible Senior Notes

In August 2014, the Company issued $245.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 2019 Convertible Senior Notes. The Company uses a quoted rate in a market that is not active, which is classified as a Level 2 input, to estimate the current fair value of its 2019 Convertible Senior Notes. The estimated fair value of the 2019 Senior Convertible Notes was $357.6 million as of September 30, 2016. The carrying value of the notes does not reflect the market rate. See Note 5 Financing Arrangements for additional information.

Viking Therapeutics

The Company records its investment in Viking under the equity method of accounting. The investment is subsequently adjusted for the Company’s share of Viking's operating results, and if applicable, cash contributions and distributions. See Note 4 Investment in Viking Therapeutics for additional information. The market value of the Company's investment in Viking was $8.8 million as of September 30, 2016. The carrying value of the investment in Viking does not reflect the market value.