XML 38 R25.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.7.0.1

Pension and Savings Plans | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Dec. 31, 2016
Pension and Savings Plans [Abstract] |
Pension and Savings Plans | Pension and Savings Plans One of the Company’s subsidiaries, Peabody Investments Corp. (PIC), sponsors a defined benefit pension plan covering certain U.S. salaried employees and eligible hourly employees at certain PIC subsidiaries (the Peabody Plan). A subsidiary of PIC also has a defined benefit pension plan covering eligible employees who are represented by the United Mine Workers of America (UMWA) under the Western Surface Agreement (the Western Plan). PIC also sponsors an unfunded supplemental retirement plan to provide senior management with benefits in excess of limits under the federal tax law (collectively, the Pension Plans). Effective May 31, 2008, the Peabody Plan was frozen in its entirety for both participation and benefit accrual purposes. The Company adopted an enhanced savings plan contribution structure in lieu of benefits formerly accrued under the Peabody Plan. In August 2014, the Company announced a program to offer voluntary lump-sum pension payout to eligible former salaried employees in the Peabody Plan that settled the Company’s obligation to them. The program provided participants with a one-time choice of electing to receive a lump-sum settlement of their pension benefit. As part of this voluntary lump-sum program, the Company settled $41.7 million of its pension obligations for U.S. salaried retirees and former salaried employees in the Peabody Plan with an equal amount paid from plan assets. As a result, the Company recorded a settlement charge of $8.7 million reflecting the accelerated recognition of unamortized actuarial losses in the Peabody Plan proportionate to the obligation that was settled. The settlement charge was reflected in “Restructuring and pension settlement charges” on the consolidated statement of operations with a corresponding reduction in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” on the consolidated balance sheet. Net periodic pension cost included the following components:
| Year Ended December 31,
| 2016 |  | 2015 |  | 2014
| (Dollars in millions)
Service cost for benefits earned | $ | 2.5 |  |  | $ | 2.7 |  |  | $ | 2.1 |
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation | 41.5 |  |  | 40.4 |  |  | 45.4 |
Expected return on plan assets | (45.3 | ) |  | (48.2 | ) |  | (54.3 | )
Amortization of prior service cost | 0.3 |  |  | 1.0 |  |  | 1.3 |
Amortization of net actuarial losses | 24.7 |  |  | 39.6 |  |  | 30.2 |
Settlement charge | — |  |  | — |  |  | 8.7 |
Net periodic pension cost | $ | 23.7 |  |  | $ | 35.5 |  |  | $ | 33.4 |
The following includes pre-tax amounts recorded in "Accumulated other comprehensive loss":
| Year Ended December 31,
| 2016 |  | 2015 |  | 2014
| (Dollars in millions)
Net actuarial loss arising during year | $ | 6.6 |  |  | $ | 30.6 |  |  | $ | 79.2 |
Amortization: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net actuarial loss | (24.7 | ) |  | (39.6 | ) |  | (30.2 | )
Prior service cost | (0.3 | ) |  | (1.0 | ) |  | (1.3 | )
Settlement charge | — |  |  | — |  |  | (8.7 | )
Total recorded in "Accumulated other comprehensive loss" | $ | (18.4 | ) |  | $ | (10.0 | ) |  | $ | 39.0 |
The Company amortizes actuarial gain and loss using a 5% corridor with a five-year amortization period. The estimated net actuarial loss and prior service cost that will be amortized from "Accumulated other comprehensive loss" into net periodic pension cost during the year ending December 31, 2017 are $25.4 million and $0.3 million, respectively. The following summarizes the change in benefit obligation, change in plan assets and funded status of the Pension Plans:
| December 31,
| 2016 |  | 2015
| (Dollars in millions)
Change in benefit obligation: |  |  |  |  |
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of period | $ | 939.3 |  |  | $ | 1,002.5 |
Service cost | 2.5 |  |  | 2.7 |
Interest cost | 41.5 |  |  | 40.4 |
Benefits paid | (61.1 | ) |  | (62.6 | )
Actuarial loss (gain) | 37.1 |  |  | (43.7 | )
Projected benefit obligation at end of period | 959.3 |  |  | 939.3 |
Change in plan assets: |  |  |  |  |
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period | 757.3 |  |  | 839.8 |
Actual return (loss) on plan assets | 75.7 |  |  | (26.1 | )
Employer contributions | 1.1 |  |  | 6.2 |
Benefits paid | (61.1 | ) |  | (62.6 | )
Fair value of plan assets at end of period | 773.0 |  |  | 757.3 |
Funded status at end of year | $ | (186.3 | ) |  | $ | (182.0 | )
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets: |  |  |  |  |
Current obligation (included in "Accounts payable and accrued expenses") | $ | — |  |  | $ | (1.6 | )
Noncurrent obligation (included in "Other noncurrent liabilities") | (163.5 | ) |  | (180.4 | )
Liabilities subject to compromise | (22.8 | ) |  | — |
Net amount recognized | $ | (186.3 | ) |  | $ | (182.0 | )
The weighted-average assumptions used to determine the benefit obligations as of the end of each year were as follows:
| December 31,
| 2016 |  | 2015
Discount rate | 4.15 | % |  | 4.55 | %
Measurement date | December 31, 2016 |  |  | December 31, 2015 |
The weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost during each year were as follows:
| Year Ended December 31,
| 2016 |  | 2015 |  | 2014
Discount rate | 4.55 | % |  | 4.15 | % |  | 4.95 | %
Expected long-term return on plan assets | 6.00 | % |  | 6.25 | % |  | 6.85 | %
Measurement date | December 31, 2015 |  |  | December 31, 2014 |  |  | December 31, 2013 |
The expected rate of return on plan assets is determined by taking into consideration expected long-term returns associated with each major asset class based on long-term historical ranges, inflation assumptions and the expected net value from active management of the assets based on actual results. Effective January 1, 2017, the Company lowered its expected rate of return on plan assets from 6.00% to 5.90% reflecting the impact of the Company's asset allocation and capital market expectations. The projected benefit obligation and the accumulated benefit obligation exceeded plan assets for all plans as of December 31, 2016 and 2015. The accumulated benefit obligation for all plans was $959.3 million and $939.3 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Assets of the Pension Plans Assets of the PIC Master Trust (the Master Trust) are invested in accordance with investment guidelines established by the Peabody Plan Retirement Committee and the Peabody Western Plan Retirement Committee (collectively, the Retirement Committees) after consultation with outside investment advisors and actuaries. The asset allocation targets have been set with the expectation that the assets of the Master Trust will be managed with an appropriate level of risk to fund each Pension Plan's expected liabilities. To determine the appropriate target asset allocations, the Retirement Committees consider the demographics of each Pension Plan's participants, the funded status of each Pension Plan, the business and financial profile of the Company and other associated risk preferences. These allocation targets are reviewed by the Retirement Committees on a regular basis and revised as necessary. The Retirement Committees have developed and implemented a dynamic asset-liability management investment strategy (the Dynamic Investment Strategy) designed to reduce each Pension Plan's funded status volatility risk as funded status increases resulting from changes in liabilities due to discount rates and other factors, investment returns and funding contributions. The Dynamic Investment Strategy adjusts allocations between return-seeking (i.e., equities and other similar investments) and liability hedging (i.e., fixed income duration and spread exposure) portfolios in a pre-established manner, with changes triggered when the Pension Plans reach certain funded status thresholds. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Master Trust investment portfolio reflected the Company's target asset mix of 31% equity securities and 69% fixed income investments. Master Trust assets also include funds invested in various real estate properties representing approximately 2% and 3% of total Master Trust assets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Retirement Committees' intention is to liquidate these real estate holdings when allowable per the terms of the limited partnership agreements. Generally, dissolution and liquidation of the limited partnerships is required before the Master Trust’s real estate holdings can be liquidated and is estimated to occur at various times through 2021. Assets of the Master Trust are either under active management by third-party investment advisors or in index funds, all of which are selected and monitored by the Retirement Committees. Specific investment guidelines have been established by the Retirement Committees for each major asset class including performance benchmarks, allowable and prohibited investment types and concentration limits. In general, investment guidelines do not permit leveraging the assets held in the Master Trust. However, investment managers may employ various strategies and derivative instruments in establishing overall portfolio characteristics consistent with the guidelines and investment objectives established by the Retirement Committees for their portfolios. Equity investment guidelines do not permit entering into put or call options (except as deemed appropriate to manage currency risk), and futures contracts are permitted only to the extent necessary to facilitate liquidity management. Fixed income investment guidelines only allow for exchange-traded derivatives if the investment manager deems the derivative vehicle to be more attractive than a similar direct investment in an underlying cash market or to manage the duration of the fixed income portfolio. A financial instrument’s level within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Following is a description of the valuation techniques and inputs used for investments measured at fair value, including the general classification of such investments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy. Mutual funds. The Master Trust invests in mutual funds for growth and diversification. Investment vehicles include a fund (benchmarked against the performance of the S&P 500 Index) that invests in large-cap publicly traded common stocks (Large-Cap Fund), an institutional fund that holds a diversified portfolio of long-duration corporate fixed income investments (Corporate Bond Fund), and an institutional fund that consists of a diversified portfolio of liquid, short-term instruments of varying maturities (Short-Term Fund). The Large-Cap Fund, which is traded on a national securities exchange in an active market, is valued using daily publicly quoted net asset value (NAV) prices and accordingly classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. The Corporate Bond Fund and the Short-Term Fund are not traded on a national securities exchange and are valued at NAV, the practical expedient to estimate fair value. Corporate bonds. The Master Trust invests in corporate bonds for diversification, volatility reduction of equity securities and to provide a hedge to interest rate movements affecting liabilities. Investment vehicles include investment-grade corporate bonds. Fair value for these securities is provided by a third-party pricing service that utilizes various inputs such as benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads and benchmark securities as well as other relevant economic measures. Corporate bonds are classified within the Level 2 valuation hierarchy since fair value inputs are derived prices in active markets and the bonds are not traded on a national securities exchange. U.S. government securities. The Master Trust invests in U.S. government securities for diversification, volatility reduction of equity securities and to provide a hedge to interest rate movements affecting liabilities. Investment vehicles include U.S. government bonds, agency securities and municipal bonds. Fair value for these securities is provided by a third-party pricing service that utilizes various inputs such as benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads and benchmark securities as well as other relevant economic measures. If fair value is based on quoted prices in active markets and traded on a national securities exchange, U.S. government securities are classified within the Level 1 valuation hierarchy; otherwise, U.S. government securities are classified within the Level 2 valuation hierarchy. International government securities. The Master Trust invests in international government securities for diversification, volatility reduction of equity securities and to provide a hedge to interest rate movements affecting liabilities. Investment vehicles include non-U.S. government bonds. Fair value for these securities is provided by a third-party pricing service that utilizes various inputs such as benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads and benchmark securities as well as other relevant economic measures. International government securities are classified within the Level 2 valuation hierarchy since fair value inputs are derived prices in active markets and the bonds are not traded on a national securities exchange. Common/collective trusts. The Master Trust invests in common/collective trusts (CCT) for growth and diversification. Investment vehicles include a CCT (benchmarked against the performance of the Russell 2000 Index) that invests in small-cap publicly traded common stocks (the Small-Cap CCT), a CCT that invests in publicly traded non-U.S. equity securities (the Equity CCT) and a CCT (benchmarked against the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index) that primarily invests in equity index securities of companies in global emerging markets (the Equity Index CCT). The Equity CCT and the Equity Index CCT are valued using the closing price reported by their primary stock exchange and translated at each valuation date from local currency into U.S. dollars based on independently published currency exchange rates. The NAV is determined in U.S. dollars and calculated as of the last business day of each month for the Equity CCT and daily for the Equity Index CCT. All CCTs are not traded on a national securities exchange and are valued at NAV, the practical expedient to estimate fair value. Cash funds. The Master Trust invests in cash funds to manage liquidity resulting from payment of participant benefits and certain administrative fees. Investment vehicles primarily include a non-interest bearing cash fund with an earnings credit allowance feature and various exchange-traded derivative instruments consisting of futures and interest rate swap agreements used to manage the duration of certain liability-hedging investments. The non-interest bearing cash fund is classified within the Level 1 valuation hierarchy. Exchange traded derivatives, such as options and futures, for which market quotations are readily available, are valued at the last reported sale price or official closing price on the primary market or exchange on which they are traded and are classified within the Level 1 valuation hierarchy. Real estate investment trusts. The Master Trust invests in real estate interests for diversification. Investments in real estate represent interests in several limited partnerships, which invest in various real estate properties. Interests in real estate are valued using various methodologies, including independent third party appraisals; fair value measurements are not developed by the Company. For some investments, little market activity may exist and determination of fair value is then based on the best information available in the circumstances. This involves a significant degree of judgment by taking into consideration a combination of internal and external factors. Accordingly, interests in real estate are classified within the Level 3 valuation hierarchy. Some limited partnerships issue dividends to their investors in the form of cash distributions that the Pension Plans invest elsewhere within the Master Trust. The methods described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while the Company believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date. The inputs or methodologies used for valuing investments are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those investments. The following tables present the fair value of assets in the Master Trust by asset category and by fair value hierarchy:
| December 31, 2016
| Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3 |  | Total
| (Dollars in millions)
Mutual funds | $ | 119.9 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 119.9 |
Corporate bonds | — |  |  | 265.7 |  |  | — |  |  | 265.7 |
U.S. government securities | 25.1 |  |  | 22.7 |  |  | — |  |  | 47.8 |
International government securities | — |  |  | 12.6 |  |  | — |  |  | 12.6 |
Cash funds | 17.8 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 17.8 |
Real estate investment trusts | — |  |  | — |  |  | 14.1 |  |  | 14.1 |
Total assets at fair value | $ | 162.8 |  |  | $ | 301.0 |  |  | $ | 14.1 |  |  | 477.9 |
Assets measured at net asset value practical expedient (1) |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Private mutual funds |  |  |  |  |  |  | 186.1 |
Common collective trusts |  |  |  |  |  |  | 109.0 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  | 295.1 |
Total plan assets |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 773.0 |
| December 31, 2015
| Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3 |  | Total
| (Dollars in millions)
Mutual funds | $ | 107.1 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 107.1 |
Corporate bonds | — |  |  | 259.4 |  |  | — |  |  | 259.4 |
U.S. government securities | 26.8 |  |  | 26.6 |  |  | — |  |  | 53.4 |
International government securities | — |  |  | 15.0 |  |  | — |  |  | 15.0 |
Cash funds | 18.2 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 18.2 |
Real estate investment trusts | — |  |  | — |  |  | 23.0 |  |  | 23.0 |
Total assets at fair value | $ | 152.1 |  |  | $ | 301.0 |  |  | $ | 23.0 |  |  | 476.1 |
Assets measured at net asset value practical expedient (1) |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Private mutual funds |  |  |  |  |  |  | 183.9 |
Common collective trusts |  |  |  |  |  |  | 97.3 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  | 281.2 |
Total plan assets |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 757.3 |
(1) In accordance with Accounting Standards Update 2015-07, investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share practical expedient have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amounts presented in this table are intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the total value of assets of the plans. The table below sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the Master Trust’s Level 3 investments:
| Year Ended December 31,
| 2016 |  | 2015
| (Dollars in millions)
Balance, beginning of year | $ | 23.0 |  |  | $ | 30.2 |
Realized gains | 1.8 |  |  | 3.2 |
Unrealized gains relating to investments still held at the reporting date | 0.2 |  |  | 0.2 |
Purchases, sales and settlements, net | (10.9 | ) |  | (10.6 | )
Balance, end of year | $ | 14.1 |  |  | $ | 23.0 |
Contributions Annual contributions to qualified plans are made in accordance with minimum funding standards and the Company's agreement with the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC). Funding decisions also consider certain funded status thresholds defined by the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (generally 80%). During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company contributed $0.5 million and $0.6 million, respectively, to its qualified and non-qualified pension plans. As of December 31, 2016, the Company's qualified plans are expected to be at or above the Pension Protection Act thresholds. However, during the Chapter 11 Cases, certain forms of payment from the Pension Plans are restricted. On November 2, 2015, the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (BBA15) was signed into law, which extends pension funding stabilization provisions that were part of the Highway and Transportation Funding Act of 2014 (HATFA) and the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Act of 2012 (MAP-21). Under BBA15, the pension funding stabilization provisions temporarily increased the interest rates used to determine pension liabilities for purposes of minimum funding requirements through 2020. Similar to MAP-21, BBA15 is not expected to change the Company's total required cash contributions over the long term, but is expected to reduce the Company's required cash contributions through 2020 if current interest rate levels persist. Based upon minimum funding requirements in accordance with HATFA and BBA15, the Company expects to contribute approximately $5.9 million to its pension plans to meet minimum funding requirements for its qualified plans and benefit payments for its non-qualified plans in 2017. Contributions to non-qualified plans ceased subsequent to April 12, 2016 as a result of filing the Bankruptcy Petitions. Estimated Future Benefit Payments The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid in connection with the Company's benefit obligation:
| Pension Benefits
| (Dollars in millions)
2017 | $ | 61.7 |
2018 | 62.3 |
2019 | 62.2 |
2020 | 64.0 |
2021 | 65.1 |
Years 2022-2026 | 312.4 |
Defined Contribution Plans The Company sponsors employee retirement accounts under two 401(k) plans for eligible U.S. employees. The Company matches voluntary contributions to each plan up to specified levels. The expense for these plans was $19.2 million, $22.0 million and $44.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. A performance contribution feature in one of the plans allows for additional contributions from the Company based upon meeting specified Company performance targets. There was no performance contribution for the year ended December 31, 2016. Performance contributions paid during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 were $19.5 million and $18.3 million, respectively. The performance contribution was paid in Peabody Energy Corporation common stock for the year ended December 31, 2015 and cash for the year ended December 31, 2014.

X
- Definition Pension and Savings Plans [Abstract] + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | btu_PensionAndSavingsPlansAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | btu_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for pension and other postretirement benefits. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 715 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/topic&trid=2235017 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_PensionAndOtherPostretirementBenefitsDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration