1
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.
Alliance Holdings GP, L.P.
Alliance Holdings GP, L.P.
RBC Capital Markets
RBC Capital Markets
MLP Conference
MLP Conference
November 15, 2007
November 15, 2007
Exhibit 99.2


2
Forward-Looking Statements
Forward-Looking Statements
This presentation contains forward-looking statements and information that are based on the
beliefs of Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. and Alliance Holdings GP, L.P. (the “Partnerships”) and
those of their respective general partners (the “General Partners”), as well as assumptions made by
and information currently available to them.  When used in this presentation, words such as
“anticipate,”
“project,”
“expect,”
“plan,”
“goal,”
“forecast,”
“intend,”
“could,”
“believe,”
“may,”
and similar expressions and statements regarding the plans and objectives of the Partnerships for
future operations, are intended to identify forward-looking statements.
Although the Partnerships and their General Partners believe that such expectations reflected in
such forward-looking statements are reasonable at the time such statements are made, neither the
Partnerships  nor the General Partners can give assurances that such expectations will prove to be
correct. Such statements are subject to a variety of risks, uncertainties and assumptions.  If one or
more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or if underlying assumptions prove incorrect,
actual results may vary materially from those the Partnerships anticipated, estimated, projected or
expected.
The Partnerships have no obligation to publicly update or revise
any forward-looking statement,
whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.


3
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
I.
I.
Overview
Overview
II.
II.
Outlook for Coal
Outlook for Coal
III.
III.
Outlook for Alliance
Outlook for Alliance
IV.
IV.
Financial Summary and Historical Results
Financial Summary and Historical Results
V.
V.
Investing in Alliance
Investing in Alliance


4
I.  Overview
I.  Overview


5
About Alliance
About Alliance
Diversified producer and marketer of steam coal to major U.S.
Diversified producer and marketer of steam coal to major U.S.
utilities and industrial users
utilities and industrial users
Focused on consistent growth through internal development of
Focused on consistent growth through internal development of
existing reserve base and disciplined acquisitions
existing reserve base and disciplined acquisitions
Operations and reserves in the Illinois Basin, Central Appalachian
Operations and reserves in the Illinois Basin, Central Appalachian
and Northern Appalachian markets
and Northern Appalachian markets
Industry leader in mine safety with innovative use of technology
Industry leader in mine safety with innovative use of technology
Well positioned coal portfolio with meaningful exposure to scrubber
Well positioned coal portfolio with meaningful exposure to scrubber
markets
markets
Strong stable cash flows coupled with conservatively managed
Strong stable cash flows coupled with conservatively managed
balance sheet
balance sheet


6
II.  Outlook for Coal
II.  Outlook for Coal


7
Coal is the Cornerstone for America’s Energy
Coal is the Cornerstone for America’s Energy
Future
Future
Coal is a vital source of secure, affordable domestic energy
Coal is a vital source of secure, affordable domestic energy
The U.S. has a 200+ year supply of coal
The U.S. has a 200+ year supply of coal
Coal comprises approximately 95% of U.S. energy reserves
Coal comprises approximately 95% of U.S. energy reserves
Approximately 50% of U.S. electric power generation is coal fired
Approximately 50% of U.S. electric power generation is coal fired
Oil, natural gas and uranium prices are at or near record levels
Oil, natural gas and uranium prices are at or near record levels
On an as-delivered basis, coal is significantly cheaper than other
On an as-delivered basis, coal is significantly cheaper than other
fuels
fuels
Proven conversion technologies will only increase the demand for
Proven conversion technologies will only increase the demand for
coal over time
coal over time
Alternative energy sources will help meet future energy demands but
Alternative energy sources will help meet future energy demands but
will not replace coal
will not replace coal
Source:  Energy Information Administration
Source:  Energy Information Administration


8
Coal is the Most Stable and Cost Effective
Coal is the Most Stable and Cost Effective
Source of Energy
Source of Energy
$1.54
$8.21
$6.44
Coal
Natural Gas
Petroleum
Delivered Cost ($ / mm Btu)
Delivered Cost ($ / mm Btu)
Energy Benchmarks
Energy Benchmarks
Source:  Energy
Information Administration and Factset
Central Appalachian Coal - NYMEX
Crude Oil, Light - NYMEX
Natural Gas-Henry Hub
MB-Uranium
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
Jan-2004
Dec-2004
Dec-2005
Nov-2006
Nov-2007
Weekly from 01-Jan-2004 to 12-Nov-2007
564.3%
191.0%
29.2%
14.3%


9
Analysis of Coal Fired Power Generation
Analysis of Coal Fired Power Generation
Growth
Growth
Total Electricity Generation by
Type in the United States
(in Billion Kilowatthours)
Steam Coal Production in U.S.
(in million tons)
Source:  Energy Information Administration
Source:  Energy Information Administration
789
896
370
522
715
942
3,330
1,979
107
122
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
2004
2030
Nuclear
Renewables
Natural Gas
Coal
Oil
3,975
5,797
1,705
1,112
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2004
2030


10
Key Long-Term Drivers in Coal Market
Key Long-Term Drivers in Coal Market
The long-term outlook for the US coal market is positive due to a
variety of emerging macro trends
Projected utility, industrial and steel growth, coupled with new
coal
initiatives such as coal gasification and CTL, will increase demand for
coal
In addition, the rising cost of alternative fuels, such as oil, natural gas,
and uranium, makes coal the cheapest source of energy
Stringent domestic environmental laws, coupled with tighter federal and
state regulations, will further constrain the supply of coal
Escalating mining costs and the depletion of high quality reserves will
also constrain low cost supply
Energy demands in China and India, and other developing countries, will
result in more US coal exports over time
Worldwide infrastructure congestion will constrain exports for many
years, which will only exacerbate demand


11
Coal Production and Pricing Outlook
Coal Production and Pricing Outlook
Total year-to-date US coal production is down
2% versus 2006 owing to a variety of factors
Voluntary shut-ins at high cost mines,
particularly in the Central Appalachian region
Mine-specific issues such as geological and
production problems
The spot market continues to show
improvement and has reacted to a favorable
supply / demand outlook
Overseas demand and infrastructure
challenges are driving US coal offshore
Utilities are willing to sign long term
contracts to supply newly installed scrubber
technology
Scrubbing will play an increasingly important
role in coal pricing dynamics
High Btu, high sulfur coal located near
scrubbed power generation facilities should
command a higher price
Utilities will increasingly optimize their
purchase of coal by maximizing heat net of
transportation costs
Source:  Energy Information Administration
Source:  Energy Information Administration
YTD as of June.
YTD as of June.
Production by Basin (in ‘000 short tons)¹
(6.4)%
(6.4)%
-
-
Growth
Growth
569,381
569,381
581,188
581,188
Total
Total
(2.0)%
(2.0)%
Growth
Growth
(0.5)%
(0.5)%
-
-
Growth
Growth
67,555
67,555
72,138
72,138
Other
Other
30,537
30,537
30,678
30,678
Uinta Basin
Uinta Basin
(0.3)%
(0.3)%
-
-
Growth
Growth
238,274
238,274
239,089
239,089
Powder River Basin
Powder River Basin
6.6%
6.6%
-
-
Growth
Growth
50,287
50,287
47,173
47,173
Illinois Basin
Illinois Basin
(6.5)%
(6.5)%
-
-
Growth
Growth
60,045
60,045
64,206
64,206
Northern Appalachia
Northern Appalachia
(4.1)%
(4.1)%
-
-
Growth
Growth
122,683
122,683
127,904
127,904
Central Appalachia
Central Appalachia
2007 YTD
2007 YTD
2006 YTD
2006 YTD
Location                              
Location                              


12
Historical and Spot Coal Prices
Historical and Spot Coal Prices
Historic Spot Price
Historic Spot Price
Forward Curve
Forward Curve
Source:
Source:
Energy Information Administration
Energy Information Administration
$0.00
$10.00
$20.00
$30.00
$40.00
$50.00
$60.00
$70.00
Jan-05
Jul-05
Feb-06
Aug-06
Mar-07
Sep-07
Weekly from 01-Jan-2005 to 02-Nov-2007
Central Appalachia
Powder River
Northern Appalachia
Illinois Basin
$49.90
$11.05
$33.50
$46.50
Central Appalachia - 29-Sept-06
Central Appalachia - 30-Sept-07
PRB 8800 - 29-Sept-06
PRB 8800 - 30-Sept-07
$0.00
$10.00
$20.00
$30.00
$40.00
$50.00
$60.00
$70.00
Oct-06
Aug-07
Jun-08
Apr-09
Feb-10
Dec-10
Monthly from Oct-06 to Dec-10
$57.61
$50.15
$12.85
$12.40


13
III.  Outlook for Alliance
III.  Outlook for Alliance


14
Alliance Snapshot
Alliance Snapshot
Alliance operates eight underground
Alliance operates eight underground
mining complexes in all major eastern
mining complexes in all major eastern
coal producing regions
coal producing regions
Diversified reserve position in the Illinois
Diversified reserve position in the Illinois
Basin, Central Appalachia and Northern
Basin, Central Appalachia and Northern
Appalachia regions
Appalachia regions
Four significant organic development
Four significant organic development
projects identified in the growing Illinois
projects identified in the growing Illinois
Basin and Northern Appalachia high sulfur
Basin and Northern Appalachia high sulfur
coal markets
coal markets
1
1
2
2
3
3
5
5
6
6
4
4
9
9
8
8
12
12
11
11
10
10
Illinois
Illinois
Indiana
Indiana
Ohio
Ohio
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania
Maryland
Maryland
Virginia
Virginia
West
West
Virginia
Virginia
Kentucky
Kentucky
7
7
Current Mining Operation
Current Mining Operation
Future Growth Project
Future Growth Project
Transfer Terminal
Transfer Terminal
Pattiki Complex
Pattiki Complex
River View Complex
River View Complex
Dotiki Complex
Dotiki Complex
Mount Vernon
Mount Vernon
Transfer Terminal
Transfer Terminal
Warrior Complex
Warrior Complex
Hopkins Complex
Hopkins Complex
Gibson Complex
Gibson Complex
Pontiki Complex
Pontiki Complex
MC Mining Complex
MC Mining Complex
Tunnel Ridge Complex
Tunnel Ridge Complex
Penn Ridge Complex
Penn Ridge Complex
Mettiki Complex
Mettiki Complex
3
3
4
4
1
1
2
2
5
5
6
6
7
7
8
8
9
9
10
10
11
11
12
12


15
Reserves –
2006
Central
Appalachia
5%
Northern
Appalachia
23%
Illinois Basin
72%
Operations Summary
Operations Summary
2006 Summary (MM Tons)
2006 Production
Northern
Appalachia
14%
Central
Appalachia
15%
Illinois Basin
71%
Select Customers
Reserve
Production
Illinois Basin
712.0
23.7
Total Company1
163.5
3.3
Region Total
Allegheny Energy
56.7
Penn Ridge
70.5
Tunnel Ridge
Virginia Electric Power
36.3
3.3
Mettiki / Mettiki WV
Northern Appalachia
37.4
3.5
Region Total
Progress; NRG; East KY
Power
20.7
1.9
MC Mining
Progress; Ontario Power
16.7
1.6
Pontiki
Central Appalachia
511.1
16.9
Region Total1
82.7
0.0
Gibson (South)
Duke Energy; Alabama
Electric
31.8
3.6
Gibson (North)
110.0
River View
Tampa Electric; TVA
63.5
1.6
Hopkins
Corn Products; LG&E
44.4
2.5
Pattiki
Synfuel
Solutions; LG&E
50.4
4.5
Warrior1
Seminole; TVA
128.3
4.7
Dotiki1
1
Includes Providence reserves (20-Jun-2007).


16
Alliance’s Long Term Growth Strategy
Alliance’s Long Term Growth Strategy
Capitalize on the expected strong demand growth in
Capitalize on the expected strong demand growth in
scrubber quality coal
scrubber quality coal
Continue to be a disciplined producer, bring on projects
Continue to be a disciplined producer, bring on projects
only with sufficient sales commitments
only with sufficient sales commitments
Continuous operational optimization
Continuous operational optimization
Pursue opportunistic bolt-on acquisitions
Pursue opportunistic bolt-on acquisitions


17
Large Inventory of Organic Growth Projects
Large Inventory of Organic Growth Projects
Permitting in progress
Estimated capital cost ~ $195 –
$210 million
Estimated reserves ~ 70 million tons high sulfur coal
Production capacity ~ 6 million tons/year
Initial production in 2009 –
2010
Tunnel Ridge
Initiating permitting process
Estimated capital cost ~ $165 –
$175 million
Estimated reserves ~ 57 million tons high sulfur coal
Production capacity ~ 5 million tons/year
Initial production in 2009 –
2011
Penn Ridge
Constructing slope and shaft
Estimated capital cost ~ $130 –
$160 million
Estimated reserves ~ 110 million tons high sulfur coal
Production capacity ~ 3.1 –
4.6 million tons/year
Initial production in 2009 –
2010
River View
Permitting in progress
Estimated capital cost ~ $100 –
$110 million
Estimated reserves ~ 83 million tons medium sulfur coal
Production capacity ~ 2.7 –
3.1 million tons/year
Initial production in 2009 –
2010
Gibson South
Illinois
Illinois
Indiana
Indiana
Ohio
Ohio
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania
Maryland
Maryland
Virginia
Virginia
West
West
Virginia
Virginia
Kentucky
Kentucky
Note:  Estimated capital costs are based on 2006 dollars and exclude capitalized development and interest expenses.  Timing of anticipated
initial production dependent upon obtaining  required permits and customer contracts


18
Focus on Safety
Focus on Safety
Safety is our #1 core
value
Alliance’s safety
performance has been
consistently better than
its  industry peer group
Innovative use of
technology to improve
safety at all operations
State-of-the-art
Leaky Feeder mine
communication
systems
Fiber optic based
mine monitoring
systems
Proprietary Miner
Tracking systems
Alliance Safety Comparison 1997-2007 YTD
1
Nonfatal days lost (NFDL).
5.6
7.6
4.8
6.4
4.7
5.7
3.1
3.4
3.4
3.8
2.7
8.6
9.1
8.4
8.5
7.3
7.4
6.7
5.9
5.5
5.1
4.8
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Alliance NFDL
Industry Average


19
Well Positioned in Scrubber Markets
Well Positioned in Scrubber Markets
Future growth potential for scrubber market bodes well for Alliance’s high
sulfur operations
Source:  The McIlvaine
Company
1
Assumption used to convert gigawatts
of capacity to million tons of coal:  9,600 Btu/Kwhr
plant heat rate, 75% plant capacity factor,
12,500 Btu coal.
Projected Eastern U.S. Installed Scrubber Capacity
122
122
122
122
122
122
122
122
122
122
122
129
76
35
11
4
188
200
238
248
272
308
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Baseline Scrubber Capacity
Incremental Scrubber Capacity
12,500 Btu Equivalent
12,500 Btu Equivalent


20
Indiana
Indiana
Ohio
Ohio
Maryland
Maryland
Virginia
Virginia
West
West
Virginia
Virginia
Kentucky
Kentucky
Approximately 676 million tons is “Scrubber”
Quality Coal
Illinois Basin:
Second largest producer in the basin
Currently accounts for ~74% of total Alliance coal production
Northern Appalachian:
Strong reserve base of ~164 million tons of high and medium sulfur coal
Currently accounts for ~13% of total Alliance coal production
Well Positioned in Scrubber Markets
Well Positioned in Scrubber Markets
Current Mining Operations
Current Mining Operations
Future Growth Project
Future Growth Project
Transfer Terminal
Transfer Terminal
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania
Illinois
Illinois


21
IV.  Financial Summary and
IV.  Financial Summary and
Historical Results
Historical Results


22
Consistent Track Record of Growth At Alliance
Consistent Track Record of Growth At Alliance
($ in millions)
($ in millions)
Note:  EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure defined as income before net interest expense, income taxes and depreciation, depletion and amortization. 
See reconciliation slide of EBITDA to Net Income
1
Based on the midpoint of management guidance.
EBITDA
EBITDA
Cash Flow from Operations
Cash Flow from Operations
$110.3
$145.1
$193.6
$245.0
$270.0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007E¹
Production
Production
Revenue
Revenue
$523.2
$623.5
$799.6
$920.0
$992.5
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007E¹
$119.0
$147.9
$230.1
$250.0
$260.0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007E¹
24.4
23.7
22.3
20.4
19.2
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007E¹


23
17.2%
19.4%
16.2%
13.7%
11.3%
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007YTD
21.9%
22.6%
27.4%
25.9%
25.9%
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007YTD
Efficient Operator
Efficient Operator
Alliance is a low-cost, efficient coal operator, delivering sector-leading
EBITDA margins
5 Year Average: Alliance: 24.7%  vs. Peers: 15.6%
Source:  Public filings
Note:  EBITDA margin represents EBITDA / Total Revenues.  EBITDA
is a non-GAAP measure.  See reconciliation slide of EBITDA to Net Income
1
Coal Peers include: Alpha, Arch, Consol, Foundation, Massey and Peabody.
Alliance
Coal Peers¹
Average: 24.7%
Average: 24.7%
Average: 15.6%
Average: 15.6%


24
53.7%
40.7%
18.2%
15.6%
5.8%
3.6%
8.4%
34.1%
14.6%
$3,191
$2,190
$341
$304
$84
$67
$132
$733
$136
Overview of Coal Sector Legacy Liabilities
Overview of Coal Sector Legacy Liabilities
Source: Latest Company Filings
1
Includes market cap of Alliance Resource and Alliance Holdings, adjusted for Alliance Holdings’
ownership in Alliance Resource.
Gross Legacy Liabilities ($mm)
Legacy Liabilities as % of Market Cap
Peer A
Peer B
Peer C
Peer E
Peer F
Alliance
Peer H
Peer D
Peer G
Alliance1
Peer A
Peer F
Peer E
Peer B
Peer C
Peer G
Peer D
Peer H


25
V.  Investing in Alliance
V.  Investing in Alliance


26
Two Ways to Invest in Alliance Partnerships
Two Ways to Invest in Alliance Partnerships
56.9%
L.P.
Interest
42.1% L.P.
Interest
1.98% General
Partner
Interest2
Alliance Holdings
GP, L.P.
(NASDAQ: AHGP)
59.9 million units outstanding
Alliance Resource
Partners, L.P.
(NASDAQ: ARLP)
36.6 million units outstanding
Public
Unitholders
Management
/ Others¹
80.0%
L.P.
Interest
Public
Unitholders
20.0%
L.P.
Interest
IDRs
Distribution growth from Alliance Resource benefits all unitholders
Strong alignment of interests throughout the Alliance Partnerships
Management owns significant interests directly in Alliance Holdings and indirectly
in Alliance Resource
1
Includes control group comprised of present and former members
of Alliance Resource management.
2
Includes general partner interest held directly in Alliance Resource’s Intermediate Partnership.


27
Alliance Partnership Profiles
Alliance Partnership Profiles
8.2%
8.2%
29.8%
29.8%
$1,639mm
$1,639mm
$1,487mm
$1,487mm
1.74x
1.74x
$2.24
$2.24
$40.67
$40.67
ARLP
ARLP
$24.35
$24.35
Unit Price (11/12/07):
Unit Price (11/12/07):
$1,458mm
$1,458mm
Equity Market Cap:
Equity Market Cap:
0.0%
0.0%
Net Debt / Book Cap:
Net Debt / Book Cap:
$1,458mm
$1,458mm
Enterprise Value:
Enterprise Value:
$1.06
$1.06
Distribution:
Distribution:
AHGP
AHGP
NASDAQ Symbol:`
NASDAQ Symbol:`
0.0%
0.0%
Net Debt / Enterprise Value:
Net Debt / Enterprise Value:
1.01x
1.01x
Total Unit Coverage:
Total Unit Coverage:
Ownership Interests in Alliance Resource
Ownership Interests in Alliance Resource
1.98% G.P. Interest
1.98% G.P. Interest
100% of Incentive Distribution Rights
100% of Incentive Distribution Rights
15.5 mm Alliance Resource common
15.5 mm Alliance Resource common
units
units
4th largest eastern coal producer
4th largest eastern coal producer
operating 8 underground mining
operating 8 underground mining
complexes
complexes
712 million tons of reserves at June
712 million tons of reserves at June
20, 2007 following Providence
20, 2007 following Providence
reserve acquisition
reserve acquisition
Asset Profile:
Asset Profile:


28
Alliance Holdings Leverage to Alliance
Alliance Holdings Leverage to Alliance
Resource Growth
Resource Growth
Incentive distribution rights provide Alliance Holdings unitholders with
significant financial leverage to Alliance Resource distribution
growth
Note:  This graph shows the impact to Alliance Holdings as a result of Alliance Resource raising or lowering its quarterly distribution
from the current announced quarterly distribution of $0.56 per common unit ($2.24 annualized).  This information is presented for
illustrative purposes only and is not intended to be a prediction of future performance
$0
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000
$100,000
$1.84
$1.94
$2.04
$2.14
$2.24
$2.34
$2.44
$2.54
$2.64
Hypothetical Alliance Resource Annual Distribution per L.P. Unit
L.P. Interest
G.P. Interest
IDRs
Current Alliance
Resource
Distribution
($2.24 per unit)
Alliance Resource
Distribution at
Alliance Holdings
IPO
($1.84 per unit)
Hypothetical
Distributions to
Alliance Holdings


29
Share Price Performance Versus Peers
Source: Factset
Note: Coal Peers include: Alpha, Arch, Consol, Foundation, International Coal, James River, Massey, Natural Resource  Partners, Peabody and Penn
Virginia.
3-Year
Year-To-Date
Alliance Resource
Alliance Holdings
Coal Peers
Alerian MLP Index
S&P 500 Index
90%
100%
110%
120%
130%
140%
150%
160%
170%
Jan-2007
Mar-2007
Jun-2007
Aug-2007
Nov-2007
Daily from 01-Jan-2007 to 12-Nov-2007
17.8%
23.2%
1.5%
6.5%
20.7%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
180%
200%
220%
Nov-2004
Aug-2005
May-2006
Feb-2007
Nov-2007
Daily from 12-Nov-2004 to 12-Nov-2007
30.3%
(3.0%)
21.5%
20.6%
54.5%


30
Appendix
Appendix


31
Alliance EBITDA Reconciliation
Alliance EBITDA Reconciliation
2007E
Mid-Point
2006
2005
2004
2003
$160,000
$172,927
$160,010
$76,621
$47,902
Net Income
(200)
161
Minority Interest Income
112
Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change
(2,400)
(2,443)
(2,682)
(2,641)
(2,577)
Income Taxes
(10,600)
(9,175)
(11,816)
(14,963)
(15,981)
Interest Expense
(87,200)
(66,489)
(55,637)
(53,664)
(52,495)
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
$260,000
$250,761
$230,145
$147,889
$118,955
EBITDA
2,400
2,443
2,682
2,641
2,577
Income Taxes
10,600
9,175
11,816
14,963
15,981
Interest Expense
(31,400)
(9,429)
26,577
(12,405)
(8,240)
Net Effect of Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities
(300)
69
(2,057)
(255)
353
Other
(319)
(573)
(488)
(687)
Coal Inventory Adjustment to Market
(2,400)
(2,101)
(1,918)
(1,622)
(1,341)
Reclamation and Mine Closing
$270,000
$250,923
$193,618
$145,055
$110,312
Cash Flow Provided by Operating Activities
Note:
EBITDA
is
defined
as
income
before
net
interest
expense,
income
taxes
and
depreciation,
depletion
and
amortization.
Management
believes
EBITDA
is
a
useful
indicator
of
its
ability
to
meet
debt
service
and
capital
expenditure
requirements
and
uses
EBITDA
as
a
measure
of
operating
performance.
EBITDA
should
not
be
considered
as
an
alternative
to
net
income,
income
from
operations,
cash
flows
from
operating
activities
or
any
other
measure
of
financial
performance
presented
in
accordance
with
generally
accepted
accounting
principles.
EBITDA
is
not
intended
to
represent
cash
flow
and
does
not
represent
the
measure
of
cash
available
for
distribution.
The
Partnership's
method
of
computing
EBITDA
may
not
be
the
same
method
used
to
compute
similar
measures
reported
by
other
companies,
or
EBITDA
may
be
computed
differently
by
the
Partnership
in
different
contexts
(i.e.
public
reporting
versus
computation
under
financing
agreements).
Estimate
midpoint
reflects
the
Partnership’s
most
recent
guidance


32
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.
Alliance Holdings GP, L.P.
Alliance Holdings GP, L.P.
RBC Capital Markets
RBC Capital Markets
MLP Conference
MLP Conference
November 15, 2007
November 15, 2007