XML 69 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Goodwill And Other Intangible Assets
9 Months Ended
May 31, 2013
Goodwill And Other Intangible Assets [Abstract]  
Goodwill And Other Intangible Assets

Note 6.  Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

 

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of tangible and intangible assets acquired. The carrying value of goodwill is reviewed for possible impairment in accordance with the authoritative guidance on goodwill, intangibles and other. The Company assesses possible impairments to goodwill at least annually during its second fiscal quarter and otherwise when there is evidence that events or changes in circumstances indicate that an impairment condition may exist. In performing the annual impairment test of its goodwill, the Company considers the fair value concepts of a market participant and the highest and best use for its intangible assets. In addition to the annual impairment test, goodwill is evaluated each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. 

 

Intangible assets that are determined to have definite lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives and are evaluated each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable and/or their remaining useful lives may no longer be appropriate.

 

Goodwill

 

The following table summarizes the changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill by segment (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Americas

 

Europe

 

Asia-Pacific

 

Total

Balance as of August 31, 2012

$

85,558 

 

$

8,549 

 

$

1,211 

 

$

95,318 

Translation adjustments

 

(25)

 

 

(144)

 

 

(1)

 

 

(170)

Balance as of May 31, 2013

$

85,533 

 

$

8,405 

 

$

1,210 

 

$

95,148 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

During the second quarter of fiscal year 2013, the Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test. The annual goodwill impairment test was performed at the reporting unit level as required by the authoritative guidance on intangibles, goodwill and other. Under updated authoritative guidance which was issued by the FASB in September 2011, companies are permitted to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. During the second quarter of fiscal year 2013, the Company performed a qualitative assessment of all reporting units of whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. In performing this qualitative assessment, the Company assessed relevant events and circumstances that may impact the fair value and the carrying amount of each of its reporting units. Factors that were considered included, but were not limited to, the following: (1) macroeconomic conditions; (2) industry and market conditions; (3) overall financial performance and expected financial performance; (4) other entity specific events, such as changes in management or key personnel; and (5) events affecting the Company’s reporting units, such as a change in the composition of net assets or any expected dispositions. Based on the results of this qualitative assessment, the Company determined that it is more likely than not that the carrying value of each of its reporting units is less than its fair value and, thus, the two-step quantitative analysis was not required.  As a result, the Company concluded that no impairment of its goodwill existed as of February 28, 2013.

 

In addition, there were no indicators of impairment identified as a result of the Company’s review of events and circumstances related to its goodwill for the quarter ended May 31, 2013.

 

Definite-lived Intangible Assets

 

The Company’s definite-lived intangible assets are included in other intangible assets, net in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets. The following table summarizes the definite-lived intangible assets and the related accumulated amortization (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

May 31,

 

August 31,

 

2013

 

2012

Gross carrying amount

$

34,532 

 

$

34,689 

Accumulated amortization

 

(8,226)

 

 

(6,943)

Translation adjustments

 

(193)

 

 

(61)

Net carrying amount

$

26,113 

 

$

27,685 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In April 2013, the Company determined based on its review of events and circumstances that there were indicators that the carrying values of its 2000 Flushes, Spot Shot, Carpet Fresh and X-14 definite-lived intangible assets may not be fully recoverable.  The specific event which existed for each of the trade names was related to the Company’s evaluation work which it started in late April 2013 and was an outcome of discussions with the Board of Directors in March 2013 to explore the strategic alternatives for these homecare and cleaning products in the Americas segment.  As a result of this work being performed by the Company starting in late April 2013, it was determined that there is a likelihood of more than 50% that these trade names will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of their previously estimated useful lives.  As a result, management performed the Step 1 recoverability test under Accounting Standards Codification 360-10-35, Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, for each of these trade names.  In performing the Step 1 recoverability test, the Company compared the carrying value of each asset group, which was determined to be at the trade name level, to the total of the undiscounted cash flows expected to be received over the remaining useful life of each trade name asset group. In accordance with the guidelines for impairment or disposal of long-lived assets, if the total of the undiscounted cash flows exceeds the carrying value, no additional analysis for impairment is required. If the carrying value exceeds the total of the undiscounted cash flows, the asset group is not fully recoverable and an impairment loss must be calculated (Step 2) and recognized during the period. Based on the results of this recoverability test, the Company determined that the total of the undiscounted cash flows exceeded the carrying value of each of these asset groups as of May 31, 2013.

 

Although no impairment existed for any of these trade names, the total of the undiscounted cash flows for the 2000 Flushes trade name was not substantially in excess of its carrying value. The 2000 Flushes trade name had a net carrying value of $9.3 million as of May 31, 2013.  While the Company believes the estimates and assumptions used in the Step 1 recoverability test are reasonable, significant changes in estimates of future cash flows such as those caused by unforeseen events or changes in market conditions could warrant a Step 2 fair value determination, which could result in the recognition of an impairment charge. Such events and changes in market conditions include actual results below forecasted results for a prolonged period of time as well as category declines, increased competition, lost distribution, reduced product offerings and the volatility of orders from promotional programs with certain of the Company’s customers, particularly those in the warehouse club and mass retail channels.

 

There were no indicators of impairment identified as a result of the Company’s review of events and circumstances related to its 1001 trade name intangible asset for the quarter ended May 31, 2013 and thus the Step 1 recoverability test was not performed for this trade name.

 

In conjunction with the Step 1 recoverability test that was conducted during the third quarter of fiscal year 2013 for the 2000 Flushes, Spot Shot, Carpet Fresh and X-14 trade names, the Company also performed an evaluation of the remaining useful life for  each of  these trade names to determine if they were still appropriate as of May 31, 2013. Based on the results of this evaluation, the Company decided to reduce the remaining useful life of the 2000 Flushes trade name from its remaining useful life of fourteen years and ten months to seven years effective on May 1, 2013. Consequently, the Company began to amortize this trade name on a straight-line basis over its new remaining useful life effective on May 1, 2013. The Company determined that no reduction of the remaining useful lives for the Spot Shot, Carpet Fresh, X-14 and 1001 trade names were warranted as a result of this evaluation.

 

Changes in the carrying amounts of definite-lived intangible assets by segment for the nine months ended May 31, 2013 are summarized below (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Americas

 

Europe

 

Asia-Pacific

 

Total

Balance as of August 31, 2012

$

24,714 

 

$

2,971 

 

$

 -

 

$

27,685 

Amortization expense

 

(1,334)

 

 

(120)

 

 

 -

 

 

(1,454)

Translation adjustments

 

 -

 

 

(118)

 

 

 

 

 

(118)

Balance as of May 31, 2013

$

23,380 

 

$

2,733 

 

$

 -

 

$

26,113 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The estimated amortization expense for the Company’s definite-lived intangible assets, which include the 2000 Flushes, Spot Shot, Carpet Fresh, X-14 and 1001 trade names, in future fiscal years is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trade Names

Remainder of fiscal year 2013

$

642 

Fiscal year 2014

 

2,564 

Fiscal year 2015

 

2,564 

Fiscal year 2016

 

2,564 

Fiscal year 2017

 

2,564 

Thereafter

 

15,215 

Total

$

26,113 

 

 

 

Included in the total estimated future amortization expense is the amortization expense for the 1001 trade name intangible asset, which is based on current foreign currency exchange rates, and as a result amounts in future periods may differ from those presented due to fluctuations in those rates.