XML 21 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.7.0.1

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 6 Months Ended
--- | ---
Jun. 30, 2017
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Revenue Recognition and Promotional Allowances Gaming revenue consists mainly of slot and video lottery gaming machine revenue as well as to a lesser extent table game and poker revenue. Gaming revenue is the aggregate net difference between gaming wins and losses, with liabilities recognized for funds deposited by customers before gaming play occurs, for "ticket-in, ticket-out" coupons in the customers' possession, and for accruals related to the anticipated payout of progressive jackpots. Progressive slot machines, which contain base jackpots that increase at a progressive rate based on the number of coins played, are charged against revenue as the amount of the jackpots increases. Table game revenue is the aggregate of table drop adjusted for the change in aggregate table chip inventory. Table drop is the total dollar amount of the currency, coins, chips, tokens and outstanding markers (credit instruments) that are removed from the live gaming tables. Food, beverage, hotel and other revenue, including racing revenue, is recognized as services are performed. Racing revenue includes the Company’s share of pari-mutuel wagering on live races after payment of amounts returned as winning wagers, its share of wagering from import and export simulcasting, and its share of wagering from its off-track wagering facilities (“OTWs’). Revenue from our management service contracts for Casino Rama and Hollywood Casino Jamul – San Diego are based upon contracted terms and are recognized when services are performed and collection is reasonably assured. The Company records revenues generated from its management service contract and licensing contract with the Jamul Indian Village of California (the “Jamul Tribe”) in accordance with ASC 605-25 “Multiple Element Arrangements.” The fair value of each arrangement element is based on the separate standalone selling price determined by either vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”), if available, or third-party evidence ("TPE") if VSOE is not available. We concluded revenues generated with respect to each element contained within the arrangement is representative of the separate standalone selling price which is reflective of fair value. Revenues include reimbursable costs associated with the Company’s management contract with the Jamul Tribe, which represent amounts received or due pursuant to the Company’s management agreement for the reimbursement of expenses, primarily payroll costs, incurred on their behalf. The Company recognizes the reimbursable costs associated with this contract as revenue on a gross basis, with an offsetting amount charged to operating expense as it is the primary obligor for these costs. Revenues are recognized net of certain sales incentives in accordance with ASC 605-50, “Revenue Recognition—Customer Payments and Incentives.” The Company records certain sales incentives and points earned in point-loyalty programs as a reduction of revenue. The retail value of accommodations, food and beverage, and other services furnished to guests without charge is included in gross revenues and then deducted as promotional allowances. The estimated cost of providing such promotional allowances is primarily included in food, beverage and other expense. The amounts included in promotional allowances for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:
|  | Three Months Ended June 30, |  | Six Months Ended June 30, |
|  | 2017 |  | 2016 |  | 2017 |  | 2016 |
|  | (in thousands) |
Rooms |  | $ | 10,298 |  | $ | 10,098 |  | $ | 19,493 |  | $ | 19,220 |
Food and beverage |  |  | 33,386 |  |  | 31,796 |  |  | 63,953 |  |  | 61,318 |
Other |  |  | 2,299 |  |  | 2,219 |  |  | 4,395 |  |  | 4,146 |
Total promotional allowances |  | $ | 45,983 |  | $ | 44,113 |  | $ | 87,841 |  | $ | 84,684 |
The estimated cost of providing such complimentary services for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:
|  | Three Months Ended June 30, |  | Six Months Ended June 30, |
|  | 2017 |  | 2016 |  | 2017 |  | 2016 |
|  | (in thousands) |
Rooms |  | $ | 1,480 |  | $ | 1,349 |  | $ | 2,736 |  | $ | 2,546 |
Food and beverage |  |  | 13,009 |  |  | 12,194 |  |  | 24,629 |  |  | 23,718 |
Other |  |  | 972 |  |  | 911 |  |  | 1,811 |  |  | 1,655 |
Total cost of complimentary services |  | $ | 15,461 |  | $ | 14,454 |  | $ | 29,176 |  | $ | 27,919 |
Gaming and Racing Taxes The Company is subject to gaming and pari-mutuel taxes based on gross gaming revenue and pari-mutuel revenue in the jurisdictions in which it operates. The Company primarily recognizes gaming and pari-mutuel tax expense based on the statutorily required percentage of revenue that is required to be paid to state and local jurisdictions in the states where or in which wagering occurs. In certain states in which the Company operates, gaming taxes are based on graduated rates. The Company records gaming tax expense at the Company’s estimated effective gaming tax rate for the year, considering estimated taxable gaming revenue and the applicable rates. Such estimates are adjusted each interim period. If gaming tax rates change during the year, such changes are applied prospectively in the determination of gaming tax expense in future interim periods. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, these expenses, which are recorded primarily within gaming expense in the condensed consolidated statements of income, were $252.5 million and $498.9 million, as compared to $248.8 million and $494.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016. Long-term asset related to the Jamul Tribe The Company is accounting for its term loan C and related $15 million delayed draw commitments with the Jamul Tribe as a loans (the “Loan”) in accordance with ASC 310, “Receivables.” The Loan represents advances made by the Company to the Jamul Tribe for the development and construction of Hollywood Casino Jamul-San Diego for the Jamul Tribe on reservation land. As such, the Jamul Tribe owns the casino and its related assets and liabilities. Repayment of the Loan is primarily predicated on cash flows from the operations of the facility. Although Hollywood Casino Jamul San-Diego opened to strong business and earnings volumes in October 2016, which met our expectations, results began to soften earlier and with a steeper dropoff than anticipated. As a result, we concluded the Loan was impaired at December 31, 2016. A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information, events and projections, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal and/or interest when contractually due under the terms of the loan agreement. An impairment charge is recorded to the extent the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate exceeds the carrying amount of the loan. The Company records interest income on a cash basis to the extent a reserve is not required for the impaired loan. As of June 30, 2017, the Jamul Tribe will be in breach of a financial covenant requirement with respect to debt to earnings ratios. As a result, the Jamul Tribe is in active negotiations with its lenders to modify certain terms of its loan agreements. We anticipate that we may grant certain concessions on our Loan in connection with the negotiations. We also anticipate our Loan will be fully subordinated to the other lenders that have extended credit to the Jamul Tribe. The Company performed a comprehensive analysis of the future cash flows that we will receive on the Loan based upon our best estimates of the operations of the facility and the concessions we may be required to grant to the Jamul Tribe. The expected cash flows to be received by the Company on the Loan were then discounted at the Loan’s effective interest rate in accordance with ASC 310 which was less than its carrying value at June 30, 2017. Therefore, the Company recorded a charge to establish a reserve of $5.6 million in the condensed consolidated statement of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017. If the concessions granted on our Loan are more severe than anticipated or if the Jamul Tribe and its Lenders are not able to reach an agreement, additional charges may be required, which could be material to the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of income. The unpaid principal balance of the Loan at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was $98.1 million and $98.0 million, respectively. The carrying value of the Loan totaled $84.2 million and $92.1 million at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Earnings Per Share The Company calculates earnings per share (“EPS”) in accordance with ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share” (“ASC 260”). Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income applicable to common stock by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS reflects the additional dilution for all potentially-dilutive securities such as stock options and unvested restricted shares. As of June 30, 2017, there were no outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock. At June 30, 2016, the Company had outstanding 7,447 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock. The Company determined that the preferred stock qualified as a participating security as defined in ASC 260 since these securities participate in dividends with the Company’s common stock. In accordance with ASC 260, a company is required to use the two-class method when computing EPS when a company has a security that qualifies as a “participating security.” The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines EPS for each class of common stock and participating security according to dividends declared (or accumulated) and participation rights in undistributed earnings. A participating security is included in the computation of basic EPS using the two-class method. Under the two-class method, basic EPS for the Company’s common stock is computed by dividing net income applicable to common stock by the weighted-average common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS for the Company’s common stock is computed using the more dilutive of the two-class method or the if-converted method. The following table sets forth the allocation of net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 under the two-class method:
|  | Three Months Ended June 30, |  | Three Months Ended June 30, |  | Six Months Ended June 30, |  | Six Months Ended June 30,
|  | 2017 |  | 2016 |  | 2017 |  | 2016
|  | (in thousands) |  | (in thousands)
Net income |  | $ | 17,079 |  | $ | 34,035 |  | $ | 22,183 |  | $ | 57,743
Net income applicable to preferred stock |  |  | — |  |  | 3,151 |  |  | — |  |  | 5,452
Net income applicable to common stock |  | $ | 17,079 |  | $ | 30,884 |  | $ | 22,183 |  | $ | 52,291
The following table reconciles the weighted-average common shares outstanding used in the calculation of basic EPS to the weighted-average common shares outstanding used in the calculation of diluted EPS for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016:
|  | Three Months Ended June 30, |  | Three Months Ended June 30, |  | Six Months Ended June 30, |  | Six Months Ended June 30,
|  | 2017 |  | 2016 |  | 2017 |  | 2016
|  | (in thousands) |  | (in thousands)
Determination of shares: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |  | 90,928 |  | 81,647 |  | 90,840 |  | 81,308
Assumed conversion of dilutive employee stock-based awards |  | 2,230 |  | 1,474 |  | 1,629 |  | 1,459
Assumed conversion of restricted stock |  | 81 |  | 34 |  | 74 |  | 42
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding before participating security |  | 93,239 |  | 83,155 |  | 92,543 |  | 82,809
Assumed conversion of preferred stock |  | — |  | 8,331 |  | — |  | 8,478
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding |  | 93,239 |  | 91,486 |  | 92,543 |  | 91,287
Options to purchase 55,062 and 1,598,500 shares and 1,696,858 and 2,889,501 shares were outstanding during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because they were antidilutive. The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted EPS for the Company’s common stock for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands, except per share data):
|  | Three Months Ended June 30, |  | Three Months Ended June 30, |  | Six Months Ended June 30, |  | Six Months Ended June 30,
|  | 2017 |  | 2016 |  | 2017 |  | 2016
Calculation of basic EPS: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net income applicable to common stock |  | $ | 17,079 |  | $ | 30,884 |  | $ | 22,183 |  | $ | 52,291
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |  |  | 90,928 |  |  | 81,647 |  |  | 90,840 |  |  | 81,308
Basic EPS |  | $ | 0.19 |  | $ | 0.38 |  | $ | 0.24 |  | $ | 0.64
Calculation of diluted EPS using two-class method: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net income applicable to common stock |  | $ | 17,079 |  | $ | 30,884 |  | $ | 22,183 |  | $ | 52,291
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding before participating security |  |  | 93,239 |  |  | 83,155 |  |  | 92,543 |  |  | 82,809
Diluted EPS |  | $ | 0.18 |  | $ | 0.37 |  | $ | 0.24 |  | $ | 0.63
Stock-Based Compensation The Company accounts for stock compensation under ASC 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation,” which requires the Company to expense the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. This expense is recognized ratably over the requisite service period following the date of grant. The fair value for stock options is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which requires management to make certain assumptions. The risk-free interest rate was based on the U.S. Treasury spot rate with a term equal to the expected life assumed at the date of grant. Expected volatility was estimated based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock price over a period of 5.30 years, in order to match the expected life of the options at the grant date. Historically, at the grant date, there has been no expected dividend yield assumption since the Company has not paid any cash dividends on its common stock since its initial public offering in May 1994 and since the Company intends to retain all of its earnings to finance the development of its business for the foreseeable future. The weighted-average expected life was based on the contractual term of the stock option and expected employee exercise dates, which was based on the historical and expected exercise behavior of the Company’s employees. The Company granted 1,475,224 and 1,561,035 stock options during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 was $1.8 million and $4.0 million as compared to $1.6 million and $3.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, and is included within the condensed consolidated statements of income under general and administrative expense. The Company’s cash-settled phantom stock unit awards (“PSUs”), which vest over a period of three to four years, entitle employees and directors to receive cash based on the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the vesting date. The PSUs are accounted for as liability awards and are re-measured at fair value each reporting period until they become vested with compensation expense being recognized over the requisite service period in accordance with ASC 718-30, “Compensation—Stock Compensation, Awards Classified as Liabilities.” The Company had a liability, which is included in accrued salaries and wages within the condensed consolidated balance sheets, associated with its PSUs of $10.5 million and $5.6 million at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. For PSUs held by Penn employees, there was $6.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost at June 30, 2017 that will be recognized over the grants remaining weighted average vesting period of 2.44 years. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company recognized $4.6 million and $8.9 million of compensation expense associated with these awards, as compared to $0.6 million and $3.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016. The changes are primarily due to the increase in Penn’s stock price year-over-year. Amounts paid by the Company for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 on these cash-settled awards totaled $0.1 million and $3.6 million as compared to $0.1 million and $4.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016. For the Company’s stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), the fair value of the SARs is calculated during each reporting period and estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model based on the various inputs discussed below. The Company’s SARs, which vest over a period of four years, are accounted for as liability awards since they will be settled in cash. The Company had a liability, which is included in accrued salaries and wages within the condensed consolidated balance sheets, associated with its SARs of $13.7 million and $7.3 million at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. For SARs held by Penn employees, there was $12.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost at June 30, 2017 that will be recognized over the awards remaining weighted average vesting period of 2.82 years. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company recognized compensation expense of $4.6 million and $8.6 million associated with these awards, as compared to a credit of $0.5 million and compensation expense of $1.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016. The changes are primarily due to the increase in Penn’s stock price year-over-year. Amounts paid by the Company for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 on these cash-settled awards totaled $1.5 million and $2.6 million as compared to $1.1 million and $1.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016. The following are the weighted-average assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model for stock option awards granted during the June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively:
Six months ended June 30, |  | 2017 |  | 2016 |  |
Risk-free interest rate |  | 1.97 | % | 1.20 | % |
Expected volatility |  | 30.67 | % | 31.22 | % |
Dividend yield |  | — |  | — |  |
Weighted-average expected life (years) |  | 5.30 |  | 5.40 |  |
Segment Information The Company’s Chief Executive Officer, who is the Company’s Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”), as that term is defined in ASC 280, “Segment Reporting” (“ASC 280”), measures and assesses the Company’s business performance based on regional operations of various properties grouped together based primarily on their geographic locations. The Northeast reportable segment consists of the following properties: Hollywood Casino at Charles Town Races, Hollywood Casino Bangor, Hollywood Casino at Penn National Race Course, Hollywood Casino Toledo, Hollywood Casino Columbus, Hollywood Gaming at Dayton Raceway, Hollywood Gaming at Mahoning Valley Race Course, and Plainridge Park Casino. It also includes the Company’s Casino Rama management service contract. The South/West reportable segment consists of the following properties: Zia Park Casino, Hollywood Casino Tunica, Hollywood Casino Gulf Coast, Boomtown Biloxi, M Resort, Tropicana Las Vegas, Bally’s Casino Tunica and Resorts Casino Tunica, which were acquired on May 1, 2017, as well as our management contract with Hollywood Casino Jamul-San Diego, which opened on October 10, 2016. The Midwest reportable segment consists of the following properties: Hollywood Casino Aurora, Hollywood Casino Joliet, Argosy Casino Alton, Argosy Casino Riverside, Hollywood Casino Lawrenceburg, Hollywood Casino St. Louis, and Prairie State Gaming, and includes the Company’s 50% investment in Kansas Entertainment, LLC (“Kansas Entertainment”), which owns the Hollywood Casino at Kansas Speedway. The Other category consists of the Company’s standalone racing operations, namely Rosecroft Raceway, which was sold on July 31, 2016, Sanford-Orlando Kennel Club, and the Company’s joint venture interests in Sam Houston Race Park, Valley Race Park, and Freehold Raceway. If the Company is successful in obtaining gaming operations at these locations, they would be assigned to one of the Company’s regional executives and reported in their respective reportable segment. The Other category also includes the Company’s corporate overhead operations, which does not meet the definition of an operating segment under ASC 280. Additionally, the Other category includes Penn Interactive Ventures, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary that represents its social online gaming initiatives, including Rocket Speed. Penn Interactive Ventures meets the definition of an operating segment under ASC 280, but is quantitatively not significant to the Company’s operations as it represents 1.4% of net revenues and $(2.3) million impact to income from operations for the six months ended June 30, 2017, and its total assets represent 2.2% of the Company’s total assets at June 30, 2017. In addition to GAAP financial measures, management uses adjusted EBITDA as an important measure of the operating performance of its segments, including the evaluation of operating personnel and believes it is especially relevant in evaluating large, long lived casino projects because it provides a perspective on the current effects of operating decisions separated from the substantial non-operational depreciation charges and financing costs of such projects. The Company defines adjusted EBITDA as earnings before interest, taxes, stock compensation, debt extinguishment and financing charges, impairment charges, insurance recoveries and deductible charges, depreciation and amortization, changes in the estimated fair value of our contingent purchase price obligations, gain or loss on disposal of assets, and other income or expenses. Adjusted EBITDA is also inclusive of income or loss from unconsolidated affiliates, with the Company’s share of non-operating items (such as depreciation and amortization) added back for its joint venture in Kansas Entertainment. Adjusted EBITDA excludes payments associated with our Master Lease agreement with GLPI as the transaction is accounted for as a financing obligation. Adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an alternative to operating income, as an indicator of the Company’s operating performance, as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities, as a measure of liquidity, or as any other measure of performance determined in accordance with GAAP. The Company has significant uses of cash flows, including capital expenditures, interest payments, taxes and debt principal repayments, which are not reflected in adjusted EBITDA. See Note 9 for further information with respect to the Company’s segments. Other Comprehensive Income The Company accounts for comprehensive income in accordance with ASC 220, “Comprehensive Income,” which establishes standards for the reporting and presentation of comprehensive income in the consolidated financial statements. The Company presents comprehensive income in two separate but consecutive statements. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the only component of accumulated other comprehensive income was foreign currency translation adjustments.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_AccountingPoliciesAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for all significant accounting policies of the reporting entity. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 6 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=68058157&loc=d3e18861-107790 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 3 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=68058157&loc=d3e18780-107790 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=68058157&loc=d3e18726-107790 Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=68058157&loc=d3e18743-107790 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 5 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=68058157&loc=d3e18854-107790 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_SignificantAccountingPoliciesTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration