XML 35 R24.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.19.2

Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 6 Months Ended
--- | ---
Jun. 30, 2019
Accounting Policies [Abstract] |
Principles of Consolidation | Principles of Consolidation: The unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Penn National Gaming, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Investments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates that do not meet the consolidation criteria of the authoritative guidance for voting interest, controlling interest or variable interest entities (“VIEs”), are accounted for under the equity method. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates | Use of Estimates: The preparation of unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect (i) the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, (ii) the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and (iii) the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
Segment Information | Segment Information: We view each of our gaming and racing properties as an operating segment with the exception of our two properties in Jackpot, Nevada, which we view as one operating segment. We view our combined VGT operations as an operating segment. See Note 16, “Segment Information,” for further information. For financial reporting purposes, we aggregate our operating segments into the following reportable segments:
| Location |  | Real Estate Assets Lease or Ownership Structure
Northeast segment |  |  |
Ameristar East Chicago | East Chicago, Indiana |  | Pinnacle Master Lease
Greektown Casino-Hotel (1) | Detroit, Michigan |  | Greektown Lease
Hollywood Casino Bangor | Bangor, Maine |  | Penn Master Lease
Hollywood Casino at Charles Town Races | Charles Town, West Virginia |  | Penn Master Lease
Hollywood Casino Columbus | Columbus, Ohio |  | Penn Master Lease
Hollywood Casino Lawrenceburg | Lawrenceburg, Indiana |  | Penn Master Lease
Hollywood Casino at Penn National Race Course | Grantville, Pennsylvania |  | Penn Master Lease
Hollywood Casino Toledo | Toledo, Ohio |  | Penn Master Lease
Hollywood Gaming at Dayton Raceway | Dayton, Ohio |  | Penn Master Lease
Hollywood Gaming at Mahoning Valley Race Course | Youngstown, Ohio |  | Penn Master Lease
Meadows Racetrack and Casino | Washington, Pennsylvania |  | Meadows Lease
Plainridge Park Casino | Plainville, Massachusetts |  | Pinnacle Master Lease
South segment (2) |  |  |
1st Jackpot Casino | Tunica, Mississippi |  | Penn Master Lease
Ameristar Vicksburg | Vicksburg, Mississippi |  | Pinnacle Master Lease
Boomtown Biloxi | Biloxi, Mississippi |  | Penn Master Lease
Boomtown Bossier City | Bossier City, Louisiana |  | Pinnacle Master Lease
Boomtown New Orleans | New Orleans, Louisiana |  | Pinnacle Master Lease
Hollywood Casino Gulf Coast | Bay St. Louis, Mississippi |  | Penn Master Lease
Hollywood Casino Tunica | Tunica, Mississippi |  | Penn Master Lease
L’Auberge Baton Rouge | Baton Rouge, Louisiana |  | Pinnacle Master Lease
L’Auberge Lake Charles | Lake Charles, Louisiana |  | Pinnacle Master Lease
Margaritaville Resort Casino (3) | Bossier City, Louisiana |  | Margaritaville Lease
West segment |  |  |
Ameristar Black Hawk | Black Hawk, Colorado |  | Pinnacle Master Lease
Cactus Petes and Horseshu | Jackpot, Nevada |  | Pinnacle Master Lease
M Resort | Henderson, Nevada |  | Penn Master Lease
Tropicana Las Vegas | Las Vegas, Nevada |  | Owned
Zia Park Casino | Hobbs, New Mexico |  | Penn Master Lease
Midwest segment |  |  |
Ameristar Council Bluffs | Council Bluffs, Iowa |  | Pinnacle Master Lease
Argosy Casino Alton (4) | Alton, Illinois |  | Penn Master Lease
Argosy Casino Riverside | Riverside, Missouri |  | Penn Master Lease
Hollywood Casino Aurora | Aurora, Illinois |  | Penn Master Lease
Hollywood Casino Joliet | Joliet, Illinois |  | Penn Master Lease
Hollywood Casino at Kansas Speedway (5) | Kansas City, Kansas |  | Owned - JV
Hollywood Casino St. Louis | Maryland Heights, Missouri |  | Penn Master Lease
Prairie State Gaming (6) | Illinois |  | N/A
River City Casino | St. Louis, Missouri |  | Pinnacle Master Lease
(1) | Acquired on May 23, 2019
(2) | Resorts Casino Tunica closed on June 30, 2019, but remains subject to the Penn Master Lease.
(3) | Acquired on January 1, 2019
(4) | The riverboat is owned by us and not subject to the Penn Master Lease.
(5) | Pursuant to a joint venture with International Speedway Corporation (“International Speedway”) and includes the Company’s 50% investment in Kansas Entertainment, LLC (“Kansas Entertainment”), which owns the Hollywood Casino at Kansas Speedway.
(6) VGT route operations
Revenue Recognition | Revenue Disaggregation We generate revenues at our owned, managed, or operated properties principally by providing the following types of services: (i) gaming, (ii) food and beverage, (iii) hotel, (iv) racing, (v) reimbursable management costs and (vi) other. In addition, we assess our revenues based on geographic location of the related properties, which is consistent with our reportable segments Revenue Recognition: The Company’s revenue from contracts with customers consists of gaming wagers, food and beverage transactions, retail transactions, hotel room sales, racing wagers, sports betting wagers, and management services related to the management of external casinos and reimbursable costs associated with management contracts. During the second quarter of 2018, our management contract was terminated for Hollywood Casino-Jamul San Diego, which is located on the Jamul Tribe’s trust land in San Diego, California. In addition, our management contract was terminated for Casino Rama, which is located in Ontario, Canada, during the third quarter of 2018. Complimentaries associated with Gaming Contracts Food and beverage, hotel, and other services furnished to patrons for free as an inducement to gamble or through the redemption of our customers’ loyalty points are recorded as food and beverage, hotel, and other revenues, at their estimated standalone selling prices with an offset recorded as a reduction to gaming revenues. The cost of providing complimentary goods and services to patrons as an inducement to gamble as well as for the fulfillment of our loyalty point obligation is included in food, beverage, hotel, and other expenses. Customer-related Liabilities The Company has two general types of liabilities related to contracts with customers: (i) the obligation associated with our mychoice program (loyalty points and tier status benefits) and (ii) advance payments on goods and services yet to be provided and for unpaid wagers. The Company’s mychoice program allows members to utilize their reward membership cards to earn loyalty points that are redeemable for slot play and complimentaries, such as food and beverage at our restaurants, lodging at our hotels and products offered at our retail stores across the vast majority of the Company’s properties. In addition, members of the mychoice program earn credit toward tier status, which entitles them to receive certain other benefits, such as gifts. The Company accounts for the obligation associated with our mychoice program utilizing a deferred revenue model, which defers revenue at the point in time when the loyalty points and tier status benefits are earned by our customers. Deferred revenue associated with the mychoice program is recognized at the point in time when the loyalty points are redeemed by our customers or at the point in time when our customers receive the tier status benefits. The obligation associated with our mychoice program is based on the estimated standalone selling price of the loyalty points and the tier status benefits earned after factoring in the likelihood of redemption. The obligation associated with our mychoice program, which is included in “Accrued expenses and other current liabilities” within our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, was $49.0 million and $39.9 million as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, and consisted principally of the obligation associated with the loyalty points. Our loyalty point obligations are generally settled within six months of issuance. Changes between the opening and closing balances primarily relate to the timing of our customers’ election to redeem loyalty points as well as the timing of when our customers receive their earned tier status benefits. The Company’s advance payments on goods and services yet to be provided and for unpaid wagers primarily consist of the following: (i) deposits on rooms and convention space, (ii) money deposited on behalf of a customer in advance of their property visit (referred to as “safekeeping” or “front money”), (iii) outstanding tickets generated by slot machine play or pari-mutuel wagering, (iv) outstanding chip liabilities, (v) unclaimed jackpots, and (vi) gift cards redeemable at our properties. Advance payments on goods and services are recognized as revenue when the good or service is transferred to the customer. Unpaid wagers primarily relate to the Company’s obligation to settle outstanding slot tickets, pari-mutuel racing tickets and gaming chips with customers and generally represent obligations stemming from prior wagering events, of which revenue was previously recognized. The Company’s advance payments on goods and services yet to be provided and for unpaid wagers were $30.7 million and $34.3 million as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, of which, $0.6 million and $0.7 million are classified as long-term, respectively. The current portion and long-term portion of our advance payments on goods and services yet to be provided and for unpaid wagers are included in “Accrued expenses and other current liabilities” and “Other noncurrent liabilities” within our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, respectively.
Gaming and Racing Taxes | Gaming and Racing Taxes: The Company is subject to gaming and pari-mutuel taxes based on gross gaming revenue and pari-mutuel revenue in the jurisdictions in which it operates. The Company primarily recognizes gaming and pari-mutuel tax expense based on the statutorily required percentage of revenue that is required to be paid to state and local jurisdictions in the states where or in which wagering occurs. In certain states in which the Company operates, gaming taxes are based on graduated rates. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, these expenses, which were recorded primarily within gaming expense within the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, were $399.8 million and $786.3 million, respectively, as compared to $253.0 million and $500.4 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018.
New Accounting Pronouncements | Accounting Pronouncements Implemented in 2019 On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 842, “Leases” (“ASC 842”), and all the related amendments (the “new lease standard”) using the modified retrospective method with an effective date of January 1, 2019 (the “adoption date”) and a cumulative effect adjustment to equity. The comparative information has not been restated and continues to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for those periods. As part of the adoption, the Company elected to utilize the package of practical expedients included in this guidance, which permitted the Company to not reassess (i) whether any expired or existing contracts contain leases; (ii) the lease classification for any expired or existing leases; and (iii) the initial direct costs for existing leases. In conjunction with the adoption of the new lease standard, the Company elected the following policies: (i) to account for lease and non-lease components as a single component for all classes of underlying assets and (ii) to not recognize short-term leases (i.e., a lease that is less than 12 months and does not contain a purchase option) within the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, with the expense related to these short-term leases recorded in total operating expenses within the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Penn Master Lease and Pinnacle Master Lease The most significant impact of the adoption of the new lease standard relates to the accounting for our Master Leases with GLPI. Under previous GAAP, as contained within ASC Topic 840, “Leases” (“ASC 840”), the Company concluded that (i) the Penn Master Lease and (ii) the Pinnacle Master Lease to each be a failed sale-leaseback transaction resulting in (a) the land and building assets associated with the Master Leases to be recognized in “Property and equipment, net” within the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (b) the recognition of a financing obligation, with the associated interest recorded to “Interest expense” within the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, and (c) the contingent rentals to be recorded as additional interest expense. Under the provisions of the new lease standard, the Company was required to evaluate its existing sale-leaseback transactions with GLPI to determine whether a sale had occurred, and if a sale had occurred, to determine the classification (operating or finance) of each component contained within each of the Master Leases. Lease components contained within each of the Master Leases that were determined to be operating leases (consisting primarily of the land components) at the adoption date resulted in (i) the derecognition of the existing financing obligation and the carrying amount of the property and equipment with an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings and (ii) the recognition of an operating lease liability and an operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) asset. Operating lease expenses are recorded as rent expense, as opposed to interest expense and depreciation and amortization expense, within the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and recorded as operating cash outflows within the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Lease components contained within each of the Master Leases that were determined to continue to be financing obligations (consisting primarily of the building components) at the adoption date resulted in (i) the continued recognition of the leased assets in “Property and equipment, net” within our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and (ii) the continued recognition of the financing obligation utilizing assumptions as determined (a) at the lease commencement date with respect to the Penn Master Lease or (b) at the acquisition date with respect to the Pinnacle Master Lease. Our Hollywood Casino at Dayton Raceway and Hollywood Casino at Mahoning Valley Race Course (“Dayton and Mahoning Valley”) properties included within the Penn Master Lease were previously accounted for under build-to-suit guidance pursuant to ASC 840. The Company was required to evaluate the components contained within the build-to-suit arrangements and determine the classification (operating or finance) under the provisions of the new lease standard at the adoption date. The Dayton and Mahoning Valley lease components were determined to be finance leases, which resulted in (i) the recognition of a finance lease ROU asset (recorded to depreciation and amortization expense over the lease term), (ii) a corresponding finance lease liability (recorded to interest expense over the lease term), and (iii) a write-off of the previous (a) carrying amount of the property and equipment and (b) financing obligation recorded with an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings at the adoption date. Principal payments associated with finance leases are recorded as financing cash outflows and interest payments associated with finance leases are recorded as operating cash outflows within our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Operating Leases, inclusive of the Meadows Lease with GLPI The adoption of the new lease standard required us to recognize ROU assets and lease liabilities that had not previously been recorded within the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The lease liability for operating leases is based on the present value of future lease payments. The ROU asset for operating leases is based on the lease liability adjusted for the reclassification of certain balance sheet amounts, such as deferred rent. Deferred and prepaid rent are no longer presented separately. Leases that are short-term in nature are not recognized as ROU assets within the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, but are recognized as an expense (recorded within total operating expenses) within the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The impact of the adoption of the new lease standard on our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at January 1, 2019 was as follows (only financial statement line items impacted are presented):
|  |  | Impacts of: |  |  |  |
(in thousands) | As Reported as of December 31, 2018 |  | Financing Obligations - Master Leases (1) |  | Finance Leases - Dayton and Mahoning Valley |  | Operating Leases - Master Leases (2) |  | Operating Lease - Meadows (3) |  | Other Operating Leases - Non-Master Leases |  | As Adjusted for ASC 842 |  | Increase/(Decrease)
Assets |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Current assets |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Prepaid expenses | $ | 62,971 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | (977 | ) |  | $ | 61,994 |  |  | $ | (977 | )
Total current assets | $ | 677,658 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | (977 | ) |  | $ | 676,681 |  |  | $ | (977 | )
Property and equipment, net (4) | $ | 6,868,768 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | (164,314 | ) |  | $ | (1,407,357 | ) |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 5,297,097 |  |  | $ | (1,571,671 | )
Goodwill | $ | 1,228,422 |  |  | $ | 5,517 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 1,233,939 |  |  | $ | 5,517 |
Operating lease right-of-use assets (5) | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 3,541,144 |  |  | $ | 112,804 |  |  | $ | 152,519 |  |  | $ | 3,806,467 |  |  | $ | 3,806,467 |
Finance lease right-of-use assets (6) | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 224,482 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 224,482 |  |  | $ | 224,482 |
Total assets | $ | 10,961,012 |  |  | $ | 5,517 |  |  | $ | 60,168 |  |  | $ | 2,133,787 |  |  | $ | 112,804 |  |  | $ | 151,542 |  |  | $ | 13,424,830 |  |  | $ | 2,463,818 |
Liabilities |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Current liabilities |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Current portion of financing obligations (7) | $ | 67,777 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | (1,534 | ) |  | $ | (16,157 | ) |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 50,086 |  |  | $ | (17,691 | )
Current portion of operating lease liabilities (5) | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 72,894 |  |  | $ | 20,515 |  |  | $ | 8,913 |  |  | $ | 102,322 |  |  | $ | 102,322 |
Current portion of finance lease liabilities (6) | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 5,752 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 5,752 |  |  | $ | 5,752 |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | $ | 577,968 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | (434 | ) |  | $ | 577,534 |  |  | $ | (434 | )
Total current liabilities | $ | 738,436 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 4,218 |  |  | $ | 56,737 |  |  | $ | 20,515 |  |  | $ | 8,479 |  |  | $ | 828,385 |  |  | $ | 89,949 |
Long-term portion of financing obligations (7) | $ | 7,080,638 |  |  | $ | 5,517 |  |  | $ | (181,262 | ) |  | $ | (2,760,587 | ) |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 4,144,306 |  |  | $ | (2,936,332 | )
Long-term portion of operating lease liabilities (5) | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 3,467,057 |  |  | $ | 92,289 |  |  | $ | 144,988 |  |  | $ | 3,704,334 |  |  | $ | 3,704,334 |
Long-term portion of finance lease liabilities (6) | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 218,329 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 218,329 |  |  | $ | 218,329 |
Deferred income taxes (8) | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 4,288 |  |  | $ | 299,523 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 303,811 |  |  | $ | 303,811 |
Other noncurrent liabilities | $ | 60,629 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | (1,925 | ) |  | $ | 58,704 |  |  | $ | (1,925 | )
Total liabilities | $ | 10,229,791 |  |  | $ | 5,517 |  |  | $ | 45,573 |  |  | $ | 1,062,730 |  |  | $ | 112,804 |  |  | $ | 151,542 |  |  | $ | 11,607,957 |  |  | $ | 1,378,166 |
Stockholders’ equity |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) | $ | (967,949 | ) |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 14,595 |  |  | $ | 1,071,057 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 117,703 |  |  | $ | 1,085,652 |
Total Penn National Gaming, Inc. stockholders’ equity | $ | 731,226 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 14,595 |  |  | $ | 1,071,057 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 1,816,878 |  |  | $ | 1,085,652 |
Total stockholders’ equity | $ | 731,221 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 14,595 |  |  | $ | 1,071,057 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 1,816,873 |  |  | $ | 1,085,652 |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 10,961,012 |  |  | $ | 5,517 |  |  | $ | 60,168 |  |  | $ | 2,133,787 |  |  | $ | 112,804 |  |  | $ | 151,542 |  |  | $ | 13,424,830 |  |  | $ | 2,463,818 |
(1) | During the first quarter of 2019, the Company identified an adjustment to the purchase price allocation associated with its October 2018 acquisition of Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. (“Pinnacle”). The purchase price adjustment increased the financing obligation upon the adoption of the new lease standard, resulting in an increase to goodwill (see Note 5, “Acquisitions”).
(2) | Represents components contained within each of the Master Leases determined to be operating leases (primarily land).
(3) | Represents the triple net lease with GLPI for the real estate assets used in the operations of Meadows Racetrack and Casino (the “Meadows Lease”).
(4) | Represents the (i) derecognition of the carrying amount of the property and equipment, net, associated with land components contained within our Master Leases determined to be operating leases upon the adoption of the new lease standard; and (ii) derecognition of the carrying amount of the property and equipment, net, associated with land and building components associated with Dayton and Mahoning Valley determined to be finance leases upon the adoption of the new lease standard.
(5) | Operating lease ROU assets represent (i) the land components contained within the Master Leases determined to be operating leases upon the adoption of the new lease standard; and (ii) with respect to other Operating Leases, represent (a) the Meadows Lease, which was acquired by the Company in conjunction with the acquisition of Pinnacle; (b) ground and levee leases with landlords, which were not assumed by GLPI and remain an obligation of the Company; and (c) buildings and equipment not associated with our Master Leases. For leases where the rate implicit in the lease was not readily determinable, we used our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the lease commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. We utilized the incremental borrowing rate on the adoption date for operating leases that commenced prior to that date. The operating lease liability is based on the net present value of future lease payments.
(6) | Amounts primarily represent finance leases associated with Dayton and Mahoning Valley, which are included in the Penn Master Lease, that under ASC 840 utilized specific build-to-suit guidance. The adoption of the new lease standard required the Company to evaluate the components under current guidance contained within the new lease standard, which resulted in all components being classified as finance leases. Finance leases result in (i) the recognition of a finance lease ROU asset amortized over the lease term and (ii) a corresponding finance lease liability (recorded to interest expense over the lease term). We utilized our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the adoption date in determining the present value of lease payments. The finance lease liability is based on the net present value of future lease payments.
(7) | Represents components associated with our Master Leases that remain financing obligations (primarily buildings). The financing obligation at the adoption date was calculated utilizing previous assumptions as determined (a) at the lease commencement date with respect to the Penn Master Lease and (b) at the acquisition date with respect to the Pinnacle Master Lease.
(8) | Represents the tax impacts related to the adoption of the new lease standard. See Note 11, “Income Taxes.”
Accounting Pronouncements to be Implemented in 2020 In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurements of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (“ASU 2016-13”), which sets forth a “current expected credit loss” (referred to as “CECL”) model which requires the Company to measure all expected credit losses for financial instruments held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable supportable forecasts. This replaces the existing incurred loss model and is applicable to the measurement of credit losses on financial assets measured at amortized cost and applies to some off-balance sheet credit exposures. ASU 2016-13 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and must be applied through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-13 on its unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

X
- Definition Gaming And Racing Taxes Policy [Text Block]. + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | penn_GamingAndRacingTaxesPolicyPolicyTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | penn_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_AccountingPoliciesAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition Disclosure of accounting policy regarding (1) the principles it follows in consolidating or combining the separate financial statements, including the principles followed in determining the inclusion or exclusion of subsidiaries or other entities in the consolidated or combined financial statements and (2) its treatment of interests (for example, common stock, a partnership interest or other means of exerting influence) in other entities, for example consolidation or use of the equity or cost methods of accounting. The accounting policy may also address the accounting treatment for intercompany accounts and transactions, noncontrolling interest, and the income statement treatment in consolidation for issuances of stock by a subsidiary. + References Reference 1: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 810 -SubTopic 10 -Section S99 -Paragraph 2 -Subparagraph (SX 210.3A-02) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=116822174&loc=d3e355033-122828 Reference 2: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 810 -SubTopic 10 -Section S99 -Paragraph 3 -Subparagraph (SX 210.3A-03) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=116822174&loc=d3e355100-122828 Reference 3: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 3 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=84158767&loc=d3e18780-107790 Reference 4: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 810 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=109239629&loc=d3e5614-111684 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_ConsolidationPolicyTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition Disclosure of accounting policy pertaining to new accounting pronouncements that may impact the entity's financial reporting. Includes, but is not limited to, quantification of the expected or actual impact. + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_NewAccountingPronouncementsPolicyPolicyTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition Disclosure of accounting policy for revenue from contract with customer. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/exampleRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 4 -Subparagraph (e) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=84158767&loc=d3e18823-107790 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 606 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/topic&trid=49130388 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_RevenueFromContractWithCustomerPolicyTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition Disclosure of accounting policy for segment reporting. + References Reference 1: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 3 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=84158767&loc=d3e18780-107790 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_SegmentReportingPolicyPolicyTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition Disclosure of accounting policy for the use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 275 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 12 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=99393423&loc=d3e6191-108592 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 275 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 11 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=99393423&loc=d3e6161-108592 Reference 3: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 275 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 9 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=99393423&loc=d3e6143-108592 Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 275 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (b) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=99393423&loc=d3e5967-108592 Reference 5: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 275 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 4 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=99393423&loc=d3e6061-108592 Reference 6: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 275 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 8 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=99393423&loc=d3e6132-108592 Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 275 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (c) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=99393423&loc=d3e5967-108592 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_UseOfEstimates
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration