XML 138 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v2.4.0.8

ACCOUNTING POLICIES | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Dec. 31, 2013
Accounting Policies [Abstract] |
ACCOUNTING POLICIES | ACCOUNTING POLICIES The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported and disclosed in the financial statements and related notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Basis of Presentation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Olin Corporation and all majority-owned subsidiaries. Investment in our affiliates are accounted for on the equity method. Accordingly, we include only our share of earnings or losses of these affiliates in consolidated net income. Certain reclassifications were made to prior year amounts to conform to the 2013 presentation. Revenue Recognition Revenues are recognized on sales of product at the time the goods are shipped and the risks of ownership have passed to the customer. Shipping and handling fees billed to customers are included in sales. Allowances for estimated returns, discounts and rebates are recognized when sales are recorded and are based on various market data, historical trends and information from customers. Actual returns, discounts and rebates have not been materially different from estimates. Cost of Goods Sold and Selling and Administration Expenses Cost of goods sold includes the costs of inventory sold, related purchasing, distribution and warehousing costs, costs incurred for shipping and handling, depreciation and amortization expense related to these activities and environmental remediation costs and recoveries. Selling and administration expenses include personnel costs associated with sales, marketing and administration, research and development, legal and legal-related costs, consulting and professional services fees, advertising expenses, depreciation expense related to these activities, foreign currency translation and other similar costs. Other Operating Income Other operating income consists of miscellaneous operating income items, which are related to our business activities, and gains (losses) on disposition of property, plant and equipment. Included in other operating income were the following:
| Years Ended December 31,
| 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2011
| ($ in millions)
(Losses) gains on disposition of property, plant and equipment, net | $ | (1.1 | ) |  | $ | 2.1 |  |  | $ | 1.4 |
Amortization of 2007 gain on intangible asset sale (recognized through 2012) | — |  |  | 0.3 |  |  | 1.2 |
Gains on sale of land | — |  |  | — |  |  | 0.3 |
Gains on dispositions of former manufacturing facilities | 1.5 |  |  | — |  |  | 3.7 |
Gains on insurance recoveries | — |  |  | 4.9 |  |  | 1.9 |
Other | 0.3 |  |  | 0.3 |  |  | 0.3 |
Other operating income | $ | 0.7 |  |  | $ | 7.6 |  |  | $ | 8.8 |
The gains on disposition of property, plant and equipment in 2012 and 2011 were primarily associated with the Charleston, TN conversion project, which was completed in the second half of 2012. The gain on insurance recoveries in 2012 was associated with business interruption related to an outage of one of our Chlor Alkali customers in the first half of 2012. The gains on insurance recoveries in 2011 related to our Oxford, MS and St. Gabriel, LA facilities. Other (Expense) Income Other (expense) income consists of non-operating income items which are not related to our primary business activities. Other (expense) income in 2013, 2012 and 2011 included $7.9 million, $11.5 million and $6.7 million, respectively, of expense for our earn out liability from the SunBelt acquisition. Other (expense) income in 2013 also included a gain of $6.5 million on the sale of our equity interest in a bleach joint venture. Other (expense) income in 2011 also included a pretax gain of $181.4 million as a result of remeasuring our previously held 50% equity interest in SunBelt. Foreign Currency Translation The functional currency for our Canadian subsidiaries is the U.S. dollar; accordingly, gains and losses resulting from balance sheet translations are included in selling and administration. Other foreign affiliates’ balance sheet amounts are translated at the exchange rates in effect at year-end, and operations statement amounts are translated at the average rates of exchange prevailing during the year. Translation adjustments are included in accumulated other comprehensive loss. Cash and Cash Equivalents All highly liquid investments, with a maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase, are considered to be cash equivalents. Short-Term Investments We classify our marketable securities as available-for-sale, which are reported at fair market value with unrealized gains and losses included in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of applicable taxes. The fair value of marketable securities is determined by quoted market prices. Realized gains and losses on sales of investments, as determined on the specific identification method, and declines in value of securities judged to be other-than-temporary are included in other (expense) income in the consolidated statements of operations. Interest and dividends on all securities are included in interest income and other (expense) income, respectively. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Receivable We evaluate the collectibility of accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. We estimate an allowance for doubtful accounts as a percentage of net sales based on historical bad debt experience. This estimate is periodically adjusted when we become aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations (e.g., bankruptcy filing) or as a result of changes in the overall aging of accounts receivable. While we have a large number of customers that operate in diverse businesses and are geographically dispersed, a general economic downturn in any of the industry segments in which we operate could result in higher than expected defaults, and, therefore, the need to revise estimates for the provision for doubtful accounts could occur. Inventories Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. The Chlor Alkali Products and Winchester segments inventory costs are determined principally by the dollar value last-in, first-out (LIFO) method of inventory accounting. The Chemical Distribution segment inventory costs are determined principally by the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method of inventory accounting. Cost for other inventories has been determined principally by the average-cost method (primarily operating supplies, spare parts and maintenance parts). Elements of costs in inventories include raw materials, direct labor and manufacturing overhead. Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Interest costs incurred to finance expenditures for major long-term construction projects are capitalized as part of the historical cost and included in property, plant and equipment and are depreciated over the useful lives of the related assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the term of the lease or the estimated useful life of the improvement, whichever is shorter. Start-up costs are expensed as incurred. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense when incurred while the costs of significant improvements, which extend the useful life of the underlying asset, are capitalized. Property, plant and equipment are reviewed for impairment when conditions indicate that the carrying values of the assets may not be recoverable. Such impairment conditions include an extended period of idleness or a plan of disposal. If such impairment indicators are present or other factors exist that indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable, we determine whether impairment has occurred through the use of an undiscounted cash flow analysis at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows exist. The amount of impairment loss, if any, is measured by the difference between the net book value of the assets and the estimated fair value of the related assets. Restricted Cash Restricted cash, which is restricted as to withdrawal or usage, is classified separately from cash and cash equivalents on our consolidated balance sheet. A portion of the proceeds of the bonds issued by Alabama, Mississippi and Tennessee, along with their accrued interest income, were required to remain with a trustee and were classified on our consolidated balance sheet as a noncurrent asset until such time as we request reimbursement of qualifying amounts used to fund capital projects in Alabama, Mississippi and Tennessee. As of December 31, 2013, there remained a $4.2 million restricted cash balance that is required to be used to fund capital projects in Mississippi. Asset Retirement Obligations We record the fair value of an asset retirement obligation associated with the retirement of a tangible long-lived asset as a liability in the period incurred. The liability is measured at discounted fair value and is adjusted to its present value in subsequent periods as accretion expense is recorded. The corresponding asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset and depreciated over the asset’s useful life. Asset retirement obligations are reviewed annually in the fourth quarter and/or when circumstances or other events indicate that changes underlying retirement assumptions may have occurred. The activity of our asset retirement obligation was as follows:
| December 31,
| 2013 |  | 2012
| ($ in millions)
Beginning balance | $ | 67.8 |  |  | $ | 67.9 |
Accretion | 3.3 |  |  | 4.8 |
Spending | (11.3 | ) |  | (8.0 | )
Currency translation adjustments | (0.6 | ) |  | 0.2 |
KA Steel acquisition | — |  |  | 0.4 |
Adjustments | 1.6 |  |  | 2.5 |
Ending balance | $ | 60.8 |  |  | $ | 67.8 |
At December 31, 2013 and 2012, our consolidated balance sheets included an asset retirement obligation of $47.3 million and $46.5 million, respectively, which were classified as other noncurrent liabilities. In 2013, we had net adjustments that increased the asset retirement obligation by $1.6 million, which were primarily due to changes in the estimated timing of payments for certain assets. In 2012, we had net adjustments that increased the asset retirement obligation by $2.5 million, which were primarily comprised of increases in estimated costs for certain assets. Comprehensive Income (Loss) Accumulated other comprehensive loss consists of foreign currency translation adjustments, pension and postretirement liability adjustments, pension and postretirement amortization of prior service costs and actuarial losses and net unrealized (losses) gains on derivative contracts. We do not provide for U.S. income taxes on foreign currency translation adjustments since we do not provide for such taxes on undistributed earnings for foreign subsidiaries that have been permanently reinvested. Goodwill Goodwill is not amortized, but is reviewed for impairment annually in the fourth quarter and/or when circumstances or other events indicate that impairment may have occurred. On January 1, 2012, we adopted ASU 2011-08 which permits entities to make a qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount before applying the two-step goodwill impairment test. Circumstances that are considered as part of the qualitative assessment and could trigger the two-step impairment test include, but are not limited to: a significant adverse change in the business climate; a significant adverse legal judgment; adverse cash flow trends; an adverse action or assessment by a government agency; unanticipated competition; decline in our stock price; and a significant restructuring charge within a reporting unit. We define reporting units at the business segment level or one level below the business segment, which for our Chlor Alkali Products segment are the U.S. operations and Canadian operations. For purposes of testing goodwill for impairment, goodwill has been allocated to these reporting units to the extent it relates to each reporting unit. Based upon our qualitative assessment, it is more likely than not that the fair value of our reporting units are greater than their carrying amounts as of December 31, 2013. No impairment charges were recorded for 2013, 2012 or 2011. In 2011, prior to the adoption of ASU 2011-08, we used a discounted cash flow approach to develop the estimated fair value of a reporting unit. Management judgment was required in developing the assumptions for the discounted cash flow model. We also corroborated our discounted cash flow analysis by evaluating a market-based approach that considers EBITDA multiples from a representative sample of comparable public companies in the chemical industry. An impairment would be recorded if the carrying amount exceeded the estimated fair value. The discount rate, profitability assumptions, terminal growth rate and cyclical nature of our chlor alkali business were the material assumptions utilized in the discounted cash flow model used to estimate the fair value of each reporting unit. The discount rate reflected a weighted-average cost of capital, which was calculated based on observable market data. Some of these data (such as the risk free or treasury rate and the pretax cost of debt) were based on the market data at a point in time. Other data (such as the equity risk premium) were based upon market data over time for a peer group of companies in the chemical manufacturing industry with a market capitalization premium added, as applicable. The discounted cash flow analysis required estimates, assumptions and judgments about future events. Our analysis used our internally generated long-range plan. Our discounted cash flow analysis used the assumptions in our long-range plan about terminal growth rates, forecasted capital expenditures and changes in future working capital requirements to determine the implied fair value of each reporting unit. The long-range plan reflects management judgment, supplemented by independent chemical industry analyses which provide multi-year chlor alkali industry operating and pricing forecasts. Given the economic environment and the uncertainties regarding the impact on our business, there can be no assurance that our estimates and assumptions, made for purposes of our goodwill impairment testing, will prove to be an accurate prediction of the future. If our assumptions regarding future performance are not achieved, we may be required to record goodwill impairment charges in future periods. It is not possible at this time to determine if any such future impairment charge would result or, if it does, whether such charge would be material. Changes in the carrying value of goodwill were as follows:
|  | Chlor Alkali Products |  | Chemical Distribution |  | Total
|  | ($ in millions)
Balance at January 1, 2012 |  | $ | 627.4 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 627.4 |
Acquisition activity |  | — |  |  | 119.7 |  |  | 119.7 |
Balance at December 31, 2012 |  | 627.4 |  |  | 119.7 |  |  | 747.1 |
Acquisition activity |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Balance at December 31, 2013 |  | $ | 627.4 |  |  | $ | 119.7 |  |  | $ | 747.1 |
Other Assets Included in other assets were the following:
| December 31,
| 2013 |  | 2012
| ($ in millions)
Investments in non-consolidated affiliates | $ | 21.6 |  |  | $ | 29.3 |
Intangible assets (less accumulated amortization of $28.0 million and $13.4 million, respectively) | 138.1 |  |  | 152.7 |
Deferred debt issuance costs | 14.4 |  |  | 17.5 |
Interest rate swaps | 5.9 |  |  | 8.3 |
Other | 33.1 |  |  | 16.3 |
Other assets | $ | 213.1 |  |  | $ | 224.1 |
Intangible assets consisted of the following:
|  |  | December 31,
|  |  | 2013 |  | 2012
| Useful Lives |  | Gross Amount |  | Accumulated Amortization |  | Net |  | Gross Amount |  | Accumulated Amortization |  | Net
|  |  | ($ in millions)
Customers, customer contracts and relationships | (10-15 years) |  | $ | 152.9 |  |  | $ | (26.6 | ) |  | $ | 126.3 |  |  | $ | 152.9 |  |  | $ | (12.2 | ) |  | $ | 140.7 |
KA Steel trade name | (indefinite) |  | 10.9 |  |  | — |  |  | 10.9 |  |  | 10.9 |  |  | — |  |  | 10.9 |
Other | (4-10 years) |  | 2.3 |  |  | (1.4 | ) |  | 0.9 |  |  | 2.3 |  |  | (1.2 | ) |  | 1.1 |
Total intangible assets |  |  | $ | 166.1 |  |  | $ | (28.0 | ) |  | $ | 138.1 |  |  | $ | 166.1 |  |  | $ | (13.4 | ) |  | $ | 152.7 |
The August 22, 2012 valuation of identifiable intangible assets that were obtained from the KA Steel acquisition included $128.0 million associated with customers, customer contracts and relationships and are being amortized over ten years on a straight-line basis, $10.9 million associated with the KA Steel trade name, which management estimates to have an indefinite useful life, and $0.4 million associated with a favorable lease agreement that will be amortized over the remaining lease term (approximately four years) on a straight line basis. The February 28, 2011 valuation of identifiable intangible assets that were obtained from the SunBelt acquisition included $5.8 million associated with customers, customer contracts and relationships and are being amortized over fifteen years on a straight-line basis. The identifiable intangible assets obtained from the Pioneer acquisition included $19.0 million associated with customers, customer contracts and relationships and are being amortized over fifteen years on a straight-line basis and $1.2 million associated with internally developed and purchased software and was amortized over five years on a straight-line basis. Amortization expense was $14.6 million in 2013, $6.5 million in 2012 and $1.9 million in 2011. We estimate that amortization expense will be approximately $14.6 million in each of the next three years and approximately $14.5 million in both 2017 and 2018. Intangible assets are reviewed for impairment annually in the fourth quarter and/or when circumstances or other events indicate that impairment may have occurred. During 2012, we adopted ASU 2012-02 which permits entities to make a qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset’s fair value is less than its carrying amount before performing a quantitative impairment test. Circumstances that are considered as part of the qualitative assessment and could trigger a quantitative impairment test include, but are not limited to: a significant adverse change in the business climate; a significant adverse legal judgment including asset specific factors; adverse cash flow trends; an adverse action or assessment by a government agency; unanticipated competition; decline in our stock price; and a significant restructuring charge within a reporting unit. Based upon our qualitative assessment, it is more likely than not that the fair value of our indefinite-lived intangible asset is greater than its carrying amount as of December 31, 2013. No impairment of our intangible assets were recorded in 2013, 2012 or 2011. Environmental Liabilities and Expenditures Accruals (charges to income) for environmental matters are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated, based upon current law and existing technologies. These amounts, which are not discounted and are exclusive of claims against third parties, are adjusted periodically as assessment and remediation efforts progress or additional technical or legal information becomes available. Environmental costs are capitalized if the costs increase the value of the property and/or mitigate or prevent contamination from future operations. Income Taxes Deferred taxes are provided for differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is provided to offset deferred tax assets if, based on the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the value of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Derivative Financial Instruments We are exposed to market risk in the normal course of our business operations due to our purchases of certain commodities, our ongoing investing and financing activities and our operations that use foreign currencies. The risk of loss can be assessed from the perspective of adverse changes in fair values, cash flows and future earnings. We have established policies and procedures governing our management of market risks and the use of financial instruments to manage exposure to such risks. We use hedge accounting treatment for substantially all of our business transactions whose risks are covered using derivative instruments. The hedge accounting treatment provides for the deferral of gains or losses on derivative instruments until such time as the related transactions occur. Concentration of Credit Risk Accounts receivable is the principal financial instrument which subjects us to a concentration of credit risk. Credit is extended based upon the evaluation of a customer’s financial condition and, generally, collateral is not required. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to receivables are somewhat limited due to our large number of customers, the diversity of these customers’ businesses and the geographic dispersion of such customers. The majority of our accounts receivable are derived from sales denominated in U.S. dollars. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon the expected collectibility of all trade receivables. Fair Value Fair value is defined as the price at which an asset could be exchanged in a current transaction between knowledgeable, willing parties or the amount that would be paid to transfer a liability to a new obligor, not the amount that would be paid to settle the liability with the creditor. Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters or derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available, valuation models are applied. These valuation techniques involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency for the instruments or market and the instruments’ complexity. Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. Hierarchical levels, defined by ASC 820, and directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuation of these assets and liabilities, are as follows: Level 1 — Inputs were unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date. Level 2 — Inputs (other than quoted prices included in Level 1) were either directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability through correlation with market data at the measurement date and for the duration of the instrument’s anticipated life. Level 3 — Inputs reflected management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. Consideration was given to the risk inherent in the valuation technique and the risk inherent in the inputs to the model. Retirement-Related Benefits We account for our defined benefit pension plans and non-pension postretirement benefit plans using actuarial models required by ASC 715. These models use an attribution approach that generally spreads the financial impact of changes to the plan and actuarial assumptions over the average remaining service lives of the employees in the plan. Changes in liability due to changes in actuarial assumptions such as discount rate, rate of compensation increases and mortality, as well as annual deviations between what was assumed and what was experienced by the plan are treated as gains or losses. The principle underlying the required attribution approach is that employees render service over their average remaining service lives on a relatively smooth basis and, therefore, the accounting for benefits earned under the pension or non-pension postretirement benefits plans should follow the same relatively smooth pattern. Substantially all defined benefit pension plan participants are no longer accruing benefits; therefore, actuarial gains and losses are amortized based upon the remaining life expectancy of the inactive plan participants. For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the average remaining life expectancy of the inactive participants in the defined benefit pension plan was 18 years. One of the key assumptions for the net periodic pension calculation is the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, used to determine the “market-related value of assets.” The “market-related value of assets” recognizes differences between the plan’s actual return and expected return over a five year period. The required use of an expected long-term rate of return on the market-related value of plan assets may result in a recognized pension income that is greater or less than the actual returns of those plan assets in any given year. Over time, however, the expected long-term returns are designed to approximate the actual long-term returns and, therefore, result in a pattern of income and expense recognition that more closely matches the pattern of the services provided by the employees. As differences between actual and expected returns are recognized over five years, they subsequently generate gains and losses that are subject to amortization over the average remaining life expectancy of the inactive plan participants, as described in the preceding paragraph. We use long-term historical actual return information, the mix of investments that comprise plan assets, and future estimates of long-term investment returns and inflation by reference to external sources to develop the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets as of December 31. The discount rate assumptions used for pension and non-pension postretirement benefit plan accounting reflect the rates available on high-quality fixed-income debt instruments on December 31 of each year. The rate of compensation increase is based upon our long-term plans for such increases. For retiree medical plan accounting, we review external data and our own historical trends for healthcare costs to determine the healthcare cost trend rates. Stock-Based Compensation We measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments, such as stock options, performance shares and restricted stock, based on the grant-date fair value of the award. This cost is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award, the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). An initial measurement is made of the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of liability instruments based on its current fair value and the value of that award is subsequently remeasured at each reporting date through the settlement date. Changes in fair value of liability awards during the requisite service period are recognized as compensation cost over that period. The fair value of each option granted, which typically vests ratably over three years, but not less than one year, was estimated on the date of grant, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
| 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2011
Dividend yield | 3.44 | % |  | 3.65 | % |  | 4.32 | %
Risk-free interest rate | 1.35 | % |  | 1.36 | % |  | 3.05 | %
Expected volatility | 43 | % |  | 43 | % |  | 42 | %
Expected life (years) | 7.0 |  |  | 7.0 |  |  | 7.0 |
Grant fair value (per option) | $ | 7.05 |  |  | $ | 6.55 |  |  | $ | 5.48 |
Exercise price | $ | 23.28 |  |  | $ | 21.92 |  |  | $ | 18.78 |
Shares granted | 621,000 |  |  | 480,250 |  |  | 575,000 |
Dividend yield was based on a historical average. Risk-free interest rate was based on zero coupon U.S. Treasury securities rates for the expected life of the options. Expected volatility was based on our historical stock price movements, as we believe that historical experience is the best available indicator of the expected volatility. Expected life of the option grant was based on historical exercise and cancellation patterns, as we believe that historical experience is the best estimate for future exercise patterns.

X
- Details
Name: | us-gaap_AccountingPoliciesAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for all significant accounting policies of the reporting entity. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 3 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6367646&loc=d3e18780-107790 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6367646&loc=d3e18726-107790 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 6 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6367646&loc=d3e18861-107790 Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6367646&loc=d3e18743-107790 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 5 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6367646&loc=d3e18854-107790 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_SignificantAccountingPoliciesTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration