XML 34 R23.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.6.0.2

Commitments and Contingencies | 6 Months Ended
--- | ---
Dec. 31, 2016
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract] |
Commitments and Contingencies | Note 16. Commitments and Contingencies Legal Proceedings In June 2016, the Company received a court decision regarding the validity of an amendment to a pension deed of trust related to one of its foreign subsidiaries which the Company contends contained an error requiring the Company to increase the pension plan’s benefit. The Company had subsequently further amended the deed to rectify the error. The court ruled that the amendment increasing the pension plan benefit was valid until the subsequent amendment. The Company determined that the likelihood of loss to be probable as of July 2, 2016 and accrued GBP 5.7 million, in accordance with authoritative guidance on contingencies. The Company is pursuing an appeal of the court decision and is also pursuing a claim against the U.K. law firm responsible for the error. The Company is subject to a variety of claims and suits that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of our business. While management currently believes that resolving claims against the Company, individually or in aggregate, will not have a material adverse impact on its financial position, results of operations or statement of cash flows, these matters are subject to inherent uncertainties and management’s view of these matters may change in the future. Were an unfavorable final outcome to occur, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows for the period in which the effect becomes reasonably estimable. Guarantees In accordance with authoritative guidance which requires that upon issuance of a guarantee, the guarantor must recognize a liability for the fair value of the obligation it assumes under that guarantee. In addition, disclosures about the guarantees that an entity has issued, including a tabular reconciliation of the changes of the entity’s product warranty liabilities, are required. The Company from time to time enters into certain types of contracts that contingently require the Company to indemnify parties against third-party claims. These contracts primarily relate to: (i) divestiture agreements, under which the Company may provide customary indemnifications to purchasers of the Company’s businesses or assets; (ii) certain real estate leases, under which the Company may be required to indemnify property owners for environmental and other liabilities, and other claims arising from the Company’s use of the applicable premises; and (iii) certain agreements with the Company’s officers, directors and employees, under which the Company may be required to indemnify such persons for liabilities arising out of their employment relationship. The terms of such obligations vary. Generally, a maximum obligation is not explicitly stated. Because the obligated amounts of these types of agreements often are not explicitly stated, the overall maximum amount of the obligations cannot be reasonably estimated. Historically, the Company has not been obligated to make significant payments for these obligations, and no liabilities have been recorded for these obligations on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 and July 2, 2016. Product Warranties In general, the Company offers a three-year warranty for most of its products. The Company provides reserves for the estimated costs of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized. The Company estimates the costs of its warranty obligations based on its historical experience of known product failure rates, use of materials to repair or replace defective products and service delivery costs incurred in correcting product failures. In addition, from time to time, specific warranty accruals may be made if unforeseen technical problems arise with specific products. The Company periodically assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liabilities and adjusts the amounts as necessary. The following table presents the changes in the Company’s warranty reserve during fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016 (in millions):
| Three Months Ended |  | Six Months Ended
| December 31, 2016 |  | January 2, 2016 |  | December 31, 2016 |  | January 2, 2016
Balance as of beginning of period | $ | 5.2 |  |  | $ | 4.0 |  |  | $ | 4.9 |  |  | $ | 3.7 |
Provision for warranty | 1.6 |  |  | 0.8 |  |  | 3.2 |  |  | 1.7 |
Utilization of reserve | (0.9 | ) |  | (0.7 | ) |  | (2.0 | ) |  | (1.5 | )
Adjustments related to pre-existing warranties (including changes in estimates) | (0.6 | ) |  | 0.2 |  |  | (0.8 | ) |  | 0.4 |
Balance as of end of period | $ | 5.3 |  |  | $ | 4.3 |  |  | $ | 5.3 |  |  | $ | 4.3 |

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for commitments, contingencies, and guarantees. + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsContingenciesAndGuaranteesTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration