EX-99.1 2 d469635dex991.htm EX-1

Exhibit 1

DENISON MINES CORP.

TECHNICAL REPORT ON A MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE UPDATE FOR THE PHOENIX URANIUM DEPOSITS, WHEELER RIVER PROJECT, EASTERN ATHABASCA BASIN, NORTHERN SASKATCHEWAN, CANADA

NI 43-101 Report

Qualified Person:

William E. Roscoe, Ph.D., P.Eng.

December 31, 2012

Report Control Form |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Document Title |  | Technical Report on a Mineral Resource Estimate Update for
|  | the Phoenix Uranium Deposits, Wheeler River Project,
|  | Eastern Athabasca Basin, Northern Saskatchewan, Canada
Client Name & Address |  | Denison Mines Corp. |  |  |  |  |  |
Document Reference |  |  |  | Status & |  | Final |  |
|  | Project #1997 |  | Issue No. |  | Version |  | 0
Issue Date |  | December 31, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  |
Lead Author |  | William E. Roscoe |  | (Signed) |  |  |  |
Peer Reviewer |  | Deborah A. McCombe |  | (Signed) |  |  |  |
Project Manager Approval |  | William E. Roscoe |  | (Signed) |  |  |  |
Project Director Approval |  | Deborah A. McCombe |  | (Signed) |  |  |  |
Report Distribution |  | Name |  | No. of Copies |  |
|  | Client |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | RPA Filing |  | 1 (project box) |  |

Roscoe Postle Associates Inc.

55 University Avenue, Suite 501

Toronto, ON M5J 2H7

Canada

Tel: +1 416 947 0907

Fax: +1 416 947 0395

mining@rpacan.com

| www.rpacan.com

TABLE OF CONTENTS

|  | PAGE |
1 SUMMARY |  |  | 1-1 |
Executive Summary |  |  | 1-1 |
Technical Summary |  |  | 1-3 |
2 INTRODUCTION |  |  | 2-1 |
3 RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS |  |  | 3-1 |
4 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION |  |  | 4-1 |
5 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY |  |  | 5-1 |
6 HISTORY |  |  | 6-1 |
Ownership |  |  | 6-1 |
Exploration and Development History |  |  | 6-1 |
7 GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND MINERALIZATION |  |  | 7-1 |
Regional Geology |  |  | 7-1 |
Local and Property Geology |  |  | 7-6 |
Structural Geology |  |  | 7-13 |
Uranium Mineralization |  |  | 7-16 |
8 DEPOSIT TYPES |  |  | 8-1 |
9 EXPLORATION |  |  | 9-1 |
10 DRILLING |  |  | 10-1 |
Sampling Method and Approach |  |  | 10-11 |
Core and Use of Probe Data |  |  | 10-13 |
11 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY |  |  | 11-1 |
Sample Preparation and Analytical Procedures |  |  | 11-1 |
Analytical Quality Assurance and Quality Control |  |  | 11-6 |
Security and Confidentiality |  |  | 11-8 |
12 DATA VERIFICATION |  |  | 12-1 |
QA/QC Program |  |  | 12-1 |
Drill Hole Database Check |  |  | 12-1 |
External Laboratory Check Analysis |  |  | 12-2 |
Sample Standards, Blanks and Field Duplicates |  |  | 12-5 |
Disequilibrium |  |  | 12-12 |
13 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING |  |  | 13-1 |
14 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE |  |  | 14-1 |
General Statement |  |  | 14-1 |
Drill hole Database |  |  | 14-1 |
Geological Interpretation and 3D Solids |  |  | 14-4 |

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page i

| www.rpacan.com

Dry Bulk Density |  |  | 14-8 |
Statistics |  |  | 14-10 |
Variography |  |  | 14-13 |
Block Model Interpolation |  |  | 14-13 |
Mineral Resource Classification |  |  | 14-18 |
Block Model Validation |  |  | 14-21 |
Mineral Resource Estimate |  |  | 14-23 |
15 MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATE |  |  | 15-1 |
16 MINING METHODS |  |  | 16-1 |
17 RECOVERY METHODS |  |  | 17-1 |
18 PROJECT INFRASTRUCTURE |  |  | 18-1 |
19 MARKET STUDIES AND CONTRACTS |  |  | 19-1 |
20 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, PERMITTING, AND SOCIAL OR COMMUNITY IMPACT |  |  | 20-1 |
21 CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS |  |  | 21-1 |
22 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS |  |  | 22-1 |
23 ADJACENT PROPERTIES |  |  | 23-1 |
24 OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION |  |  | 24-1 |
25 INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS |  |  | 25-1 |
26 RECOMMENDATIONS |  |  | 26-1 |
27 REFERENCES |  |  | 27-1 |
28 DATE AND SIGNATURE PAGE |  |  | 28-1 |
29 CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON |  |  | 29-1 |

LIST OF TABLES

|  | PAGE |
Table 1-1 Mineral Resource Estimate as of December 31, 2012 (100% Basis) |  |  | 1-1 |
Table 4-1 Land Tenure Details |  |  | 4-2 |
Table 6-1 2010 SRK Mineral Resource Estimate |  |  | 6-5 |
Table 10-1 Drilling Statistics |  |  | 10-4 |
Table 10-2 A Deposit and B Deposit Drill Hole Intersections |  |  | 10-14 |
Table 10-3 A Deposit and B Deposit Drill hole Intersections With Grades>1.0% U 3 O 8 |  |  | 10-18 |
Table 11-1 Quality Control Sample Allocations |  |  | 11-8 |
Table 14-1 Mineral Resource Estimate for the Phoenix Deposits as of December 31, 2012 (100% Basis) |  |  | 14-1 |
Table 14-2 Vulcan Database Records |  |  | 14-2 |
Table 14-3 Basic Statistics of Grade and GxD Composites for A and B Deposits HG and LG Domains |  |  | 14-11 |
Table 14-4 Block Model Interpolation Parameters |  |  | 14-15 |
Table 14-5 Volume Comparison for Wireframe and Blocks by Domain |  |  | 14-21 |
Table 14-6 Statistics of Block Grades Compared to Composite Grades by Domain |  |  | 14-22 |
Table 14-7 Mineral Resource Estimate for the Phoenix Deposits at a Cut-off Grade of 0.8% U 3 O 8 as of December 31, 2012 |  |  | 14-23 |

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page ii

| www.rpacan.com

LIST OF FIGURES

|  | PAGE |
Figure 4-1 Wheeler River Property Location Map |  |  | 4-3 |
Figure 4-2 Wheeler River Property Map |  |  | 4-4 |
Figure 7-1 Regional Geology and Uranium Deposits |  |  | 7-4 |
Figure 7-2 Simplified Geological Map of Athabasca Basin |  |  | 7-5 |
Figure 7-3 Schematic Section of the Athabasca and Basement Rock Types |  |  | 7-9 |
Figure 7-4 Basement Geology |  |  | 7-11 |
Figure 7-5 Schematic of the Quartzite Ridge |  |  | 7-12 |
Figure 7-6 WS Reverse Fault Offsets of the Unconformity |  |  | 7-15 |
Figure 8-1 Schematic of Unconformity Type Uranium Deposit |  |  | 8-3 |
Figure 10-1 Phoenix A and B Deposits Drill Hole Location Map |  |  | 10-6 |
Figure 10-2 Calibration curve for Geiger-Mueller SN 3818 probe |  |  | 10-10 |
Figure 11-1 Phoenix Deposits U 3 O 8 (wt%) Versus U 3 O 8 from U Partial |  |  | 11-5 |
Figure 12-1 U 3 O 8 DNC versus ICP-OES Assay Values |  |  | 12-4 |
Figure 12-2 USTD1 Analyses |  |  | 12-6 |
Figure 12-3 USTD2 Analyses |  |  | 12-6 |
Figure 12-4 USTD3 Analyses |  |  | 12-7 |
Figure 12-5 USTD4 Analyses |  |  | 12-7 |
Figure 12-6 USTD5Analyses |  |  | 12-8 |
Figure 12-7 USTD6 Analyses |  |  | 12-8 |
Figure 12-8 Blank Sample Analyses Results |  |  | 12-10 |
Figure 12-9 Field Duplicate Analyses |  |  | 12-11 |
Figure 12-10 WR-318 Radiometric vs. Assay % U 3 O 8 Values |  |  | 12-14 |
Figure 12-11 WR-334 Radiometric vs. Assay % U 3 O 8 Values |  |  | 12-14 |
Figure 12-12 WR-273 Radiometric vs. Assay % U 3 O 8 Values |  |  | 12-15 |
Figure 12-13 WR-435 Radiometric vs. Assay % U 3 O 8 Values |  |  | 12-15 |
Figure 12-14 Radiometric Assay Grades Compared to Chemical Assay Grades for 30 Mineralized Intersections in Phoenix A and B Deposits |  |  | 12-16 |
Figure 14-1 Phoenix A and Phoenix B Deposits Drill Hole Locations |  |  | 14-3 |
Figure 14-2 Phoenix A Deposit Typical Cross Section with HG and LG Domains |  |  | 14-6 |
Figure 14-3 Phoenix B Deposit Typical Cross Section with HG and LG Domains |  |  | 14-7 |
Figure 14-4 Logarithmic Plot of Dry Bulk Density Versus Uranium Grade |  |  | 14-9 |
Figure 14-5 Grade Composite Histograms for A and B Deposits HG and LG Domains. |  |  | 14-12 |
Figure 14-6 Phoenix A Deposit 3D Block Model |  |  | 14-16 |
Figure 14-7 Phoenix A Deposit 3D HG Domain Block Model |  |  | 14-17 |
Figure 14-8 Phoenix A Deposit Block Model Showing Inferred and Indicated Resources |  |  | 14-19 |
Figure 14-9 Phoenix B Deposit Block Model Showing Inferred and Indicated Resources |  |  | 14-20 |

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page iii

| www.rpacan.com

1 SUMMARY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Roscoe Postle Associates Inc. (RPA) was retained by Denison Mines Corp. (Denison) on behalf of the Wheeler River Joint Venture to prepare an independent Technical Report on the Phoenix Uranium Deposits. The purpose of this report is to support a Mineral Resource estimate for the Phoenix A and B Deposits of the Wheeler River Project prepared by Denison and audited by RPA. The Phoenix Deposits are Athabasca Basin unconformity-type uranium deposits. This report has been prepared to conform to NI 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.

Denison is a Toronto-based mining company focused on uranium exploration and development in Canada, Mongolia, and Zambia. Denison is listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (symbol DML) and on the NYSE MKT (symbol DNN).

Denison owns 60% of the Wheeler River Joint Venture, Cameco Corporation owns 30%, and JCU (Canada) Exploration Company Limited owns the remaining 10%. The Wheeler River Property consists of 19 contiguous claims in northern Saskatchewan. Denison’s additional assets include an interest in one of the four licensed conventional uranium mills in North America – Denison has a 22.5% interest in the McClean Lake mill in Saskatchewan.

The Mineral Resource estimates for the Phoenix Deposits are summarized in Table 1-1.

TABLE 1-1 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2012

(100% BASIS)

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits

Category |  | Tonnes |  |  | Grade (% U3 O 8 ) |  |  | Million lbs U3 O 8 |
Indicated |  |  | 152,400 |  |  |  | 15.6 |  |  |  | 52.3 |
Inferred |  |  | 11,600 |  |  |  | 29.8 |  |  |  | 7.6 |

Notes:

1. | CIM Definitions were followed for classification of Mineral Resources.

2. | Mineral Resources are reported above a cut-off grade of 0.8% U 3 O 8 , which is based on internal Denison studies and a price of $50 per lb U 3 O 8 .

3. | High grade composites are subjected to a high grade search restriction.

4. | Bulk density is derived from grade using a formula based on 165 measurements.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 1-1

| www.rpacan.com

CONCLUSIONS

Drilling at the Wheeler River Property from 2008 to 2012 has discovered and delineated the Phoenix uranium deposits at the linear intersection of the Athabasca sandstone basal unconformity with a regional fault zone, the WS Fault, and graphitic pelite basement rocks.

The Phoenix Deposits consist of the Phoenix A and Phoenix B deposits located approximately 400 m below surface within a one kilometre long, northeast trending, mineralized corridor. Both deposits contain a higher grade core within a lower grade mineralized envelope and extend southeastward from the WS Fault along the unconformity. Some mineralization also occurs on the northwest side of the WS fault but commonly at a slightly lower elevation.

Some uranium mineralization occurs in basement rocks below and adjacent to the Phoenix Deposits which suggests some potential for more of the same.

Mineral Resources of the A and B Deposits have been estimated by Denison and audited by RPA based on 168 diamond drill holes totalling 77,939 m. Indicated resources total 152,400 t at 15.6% U 3 O 8 containing 52.3 million lbs U 3 O 8 . Inferred resources total 11,600 t at 29.8%U 3 O 8 containing 7.6 million lbs U 3 O 8.

More diamond drilling is warranted in the Inferred areas of the A and B Deposits, particularly in the vicinity of very high grade drill holes WR-401 and WR-306 in A Deposit. The Mineral Resource estimate should be updated after this drilling is completed to upgrade the Inferred resources to the Indicated category if justified by results.

In RPA’s opinion, a Preliminary Economic Assessment should be carried out on the Phoenix deposit.

More diamond drilling is warranted to test other exploration targets on the Wheeler River Joint Venture, particularly along strike to the northeast and southwest of the Phoenix Deposits.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 1-2

| www.rpacan.com

RECOMMENDATIONS

The Wheeler River Joint Venture has a planned 2013 exploration program consisting of an approximately 48 hole diamond drill program with two rigs beginning in the first quarter of 2013. The budget for this program is C$6.8 million. Emphasis will be on exploration, particularly to the northeast of the Phoenix A Deposit, as well as other targets on the Wheeler River Property. RPA has reviewed the Wheeler River Joint Venture 2013 exploration program and concurs with the objectives and budget.

In addition to this work, RPA recommends six infill drill holes in the Phoenix A Deposit and four infill drill holes in the Phoenix B Deposit. The cost of this additional drilling would be approximately $1.2 million. RPA also recommends a Mineral Resource estimate update after the infill drilling and a Preliminary Economic Assessment on the Phoenix Deposits at an estimated cost of approximately $200,000.

RPA recommends that Denison continue to collect additional core density data to increase the confidence in densities of the entire grade range.

TECHNICAL SUMMARY

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION

The Phoenix Deposits are located within the Wheeler River Property (the Property), which is located in the eastern Athabasca Basin of northern Saskatchewan approximately 600 km north of Saskatoon, 260 km north of La Ronge and 110 km southwest of Points North Landing, in northern Saskatchewan. The center of the Property is located approximately 35 km north-northeast of the Key Lake mill and 35 km southwest of the McArthur River mine, which are operated by Cameco Corporation (Cameco).

LAND TENURE

The Wheeler River Property comprises 19 contiguous claims held as a Joint Venture among Denison (60%), Cameco (30%) and JCU (Canada) Exploration Co. Ltd. (10%) with no back-in rights or royalties that need to be paid.

ACCESS AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Access to the Phoenix Deposits is by road, helicopter, or fixed wing aircraft from Saskatoon. Vehicle access to the Property is by Highway 914, which terminates at the Key Lake mill. The ore haul road between the Key Lake and McArthur River operations lies within the eastern part of the Property. An older access road, the Fox Lake Road, between Key Lake and McArthur River provides access to most of the northwestern side of the Property. Gravel and sand roads and drill trails provide access by either four-wheel-drive or all-terrain-vehicle to the rest of the Property.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 1-3

| www.rpacan.com

La Ronge is the nearest commercial/urban center where most exploration supplies and services can be obtained. Two airlines offer daily, scheduled flight services between Saskatoon and La Ronge.

Field operations are currently conducted from Denison’s Wheeler River camp, three kilometers southwest of the Phoenix Deposits. The camp, which is operated by Denison, provides accommodation for up to forty exploration personnel. Fuel and miscellaneous supplies are stored in existing warehouse and tank facilities at the camp. The site generates its own power. Abundant water is available from the numerous lakes and rivers in the area.

HISTORY

The Wheeler River Property was staked on July 6, 1977, due to its proximity to the Key Lake uranium discoveries, and was vended into an agreement on December 28, 1978 among AGIP Canada Ltd. (AGIP), E&B Explorations Ltd. (E&B), and Saskatchewan Mining Development Corporation (SMDC), with each holding a one-third interest. On July 31, 1984, all parties divested a 13.3% interest and allowed Denison Mines Limited, a predecessor company to Denison Mines Corp., to earn a 40% interest. On December 1, 1986, E&B allowed PNC Exploration (Canada) Co. Ltd. (PNC) to earn a 10% interest from one-half of its 20% interest. In the early 1990s, AGIP sold its 20% interest to Cameco, which was a successor to SMDC. In 1996, Imperial Metals Corporation, a successor to E&B, sold an 8% interest to Cameco and a 2% interest to PNC. Participating interests in 2004 were Cameco (48%), JCU (a successor to PNC, 12%), and Denison (40%).

In late 2004, Denison entered into an agreement to earn a further 20% interest by expending $7 million within six years. In November 2004, Denison became the operator of the Wheeler River Joint Venture. When the earn-in obligations were completed; the participating interests were Denison-60%, Cameco-30%, and JCU-10%. Since November 2004, Denison has been the project operator.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 1-4

| www.rpacan.com

Except for the years 1990-1995, exploration activities comprising airborne and ground geophysical surveys, geochemical surveys, prospecting and diamond drilling have been carried out on the Wheeler River Property continuously from 1978 to present.

GEOLOGY AND MINERALIZATION

The Phoenix uranium deposits are located near the southeastern margin of the Athabasca Basin in the southwest part of the Churchill Structural Province of the Canadian Shield (Figure 7-1). The Athabasca Basin is a broad, closed and elliptically shaped, cratonic basin with an area of 425 km (east-west) by 225 km (north-south). The bedrock geology of the area consists of Archean and Paleo-Proterozoic gneisses unconformably overlain by up to 1,500 m of flat-lying, unmetamorphosed sandstones and conglomerates of the mid-Proterozoic Athabasca Group. The Wheeler River Property is located near the transition zone between two prominent litho-structural domains within the Precambrian basement; the Mudjatik Domain to the west and the Wollaston Domain to the east.

The Wheeler River Property lies in the eastern part of the Athabasca Basin where undeformed, late Paleoproterozoic to Mesoproterozoic sandstone, conglomerate, and mudstone of the Athabasca Group unconformably overlie early Paleoproterozoic and Archean crystalline basement rocks. The Phoenix Deposit mineralization, generally occurring at depths ranging from 390 m to 420 m is interpreted to be structurally controlled by the northeast-southwest trending (55º azimuth) WS shear fault which dips 55º to the southeast.

The local geology of the Wheeler River Property is consistent with the regional geology and consists of the following units from top to bottom:

| • | Quaternary Deposits: The Property is partially covered by lakes and muskeg, which overlie a complex succession of glacial deposits up to 120 m in thickness These include eskers and outwash sand plains, well-developed drumlins, till plains, and glaciofluvial plain deposits.

| • | Athabasca Group: Little-deformed late Paleoproterozoic to Mesoproterozoic Athabasca Group strata comprised of Manitou Falls Formation sandstones and conglomerates unconformably overlie the crystalline basement and have a thickness that varies from 170 m over the quartzite ridge to at least 560 m on the western side of the Property.

| • | Basement Geology: Basement rocks on the Phoenix Deposits are part of the Wollaston Domain and are comprised of metasedimentary and granitoid gneisses. The metasedimentary rocks belong to the Wollaston Supergroup and include graphitic and non-graphitic pelitic and semipelitic gneisses, meta-quartzite, and rare calc-silicate rocks together with felsic and quartz feldspathic granitoid gneisses.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 1-5

| www.rpacan.com

The Phoenix Deposits are Athabasca Basin unconformity-type uranium deposits. Uranium mineralization is in the form of the oxide uraninite/pitchblende (U 3 O 8). Values of all accompanying metals are low, particularly in comparison with several sandstone-hosted deposits, which can have very high values for Ni, Co, and As.

Alteration is typical unconformity-associated style, with a form and nature similar to other Athabasca Basin deposits. The sandstones are altered for as much as 200 m above the unconformity, and exhibit varying degrees of silicification and desilicification, as well as dravitization, chloritization, and illitization. In addition, hydrothermal hematite and drusy quartz are present in the sandstone and often in the basement rocks.

The mineralization in the Phoenix Deposits occurs at the unconformity contact between sandstone of the Athabasca group and underlying lower Proterozoic Wollaston Group metasedimentary rocks. Mineralization and alteration have been traced over a strike length of approximately one kilometre. Since the discovery hole WR-249 was drilled in 2008, 238 drill holes have reached the target depth, delineating two distinct zones (A Deposit and B Deposit) of high-grade mineralization.

EXPLORATION

Following the discovery of the Phoenix Deposits in 2008, Denison as operator of the Wheeler River Joint Venture completed additional geophysical surveys and drilling programs in each of the years 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012.

Geophysical surveys included 67.6 line-km of DC Resistivity/Induced Polarization in 2009, 76.2 km of ground EM surveying in 2010, and large amounts of additional DC/IP surveying in each of 2011 (120.6 line-km) and 2012 (48.2 line-km).

Diamond drilling during the period 2009-2012 was primarily focussed on definition drilling at the Phoenix deposits, but numerous holes were also completed on other targets on the Wheeler River Property. Drilling is discussed in further detail below.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 1-6

| www.rpacan.com

DRILLING

Since 1978 a total of 496 diamond drill holes and 61 reverse circulation (RC) drill holes totalling 204,822 m have been completed within the Wheeler River Property of which 229 drill holes totalling 107,905 m of diamond drilling have delineated the Phoenix Deposits. Well-established drilling industry practices were used in the drilling programs.

Most recently, during 2011, a two-phase drilling program of 80 diamond drill holes totalling 38,426.6 m was carried out on mineral dispositions S-97908, S-97909, and S-98341. In 2012, the Wheeler JV completed a total of 51 diamond holes totalling 23,073 m on the Phoenix A Deposit and B Deposit target areas.

All drill holes on the Wheeler River Property were logged with a radiometric probe to measure the natural gamma radiation, from which an indirect estimate of uranium content could be made. The gamma probes were calibrated and radiometric estimates of %U 3 O 8 were used in the drill hole database where core recovery was less than 80%, which involves approximately 20% of the drill holes used for resource estimation. Well established drilling industry practices were used in all of the drilling programs.

ANALYSES AND DATA VERIFICATION

Drill core from the Phoenix Deposits was photographed, logged, marked for sampling, split, bagged, and sealed for shipment by Denison personnel at their field logging facility. All samples for assay or geochemical analyses were transported by Denison personnel to the Saskatchewan Research Council Geoanalytical Laboratories (SRC) in Saskatoon, SK. Uranium analyses were carried out at SRC which is accredited by the Standards Council of Canada as an ISO/IEC 17025 Laboratory for Mineral Analysis Testing and is also accredited ISO/IEC 17025:2005 for the analysis of U 3 O 8.

Denison sent one in every 25 samples to the SRC’s Delayed Neutron Counting (DNC) laboratory, a separate lab facility located at SRC Analytical Laboratories in Saskatoon to compare the values using two different methods, by two separate labs.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 1-7

| www.rpacan.com

Analytical standards were used to monitor analytical precision and accuracy, and field standards were used as an independent monitor of laboratory performance. Six uranium assay standards have been prepared for use in monitoring the accuracy and precision of uranium assays received from the laboratory. Denison employed a lithological blank composed of quartzite to monitor the potential for contamination during sampling, processing, and analysis. Core duplicates were obtained by collecting a second sample of the same material, through splitting the original sample, or other similar technique, and were submitted as an independent sample. Duplicates were typically collected at a minimum rate of one per 20 samples in order to obtain a collection rate of 5%. In RPA’s opinion, the sample preparation and analytical methods are standard in the industry. Results of the quality assurance and data verification efforts demonstrate that the data are of sufficient quality for Mineral Resource estimates.

MINERAL RESOURCES

Denison has estimated Mineral Resources for the Phoenix A and B Deposits based on results of several surface diamond drilling campaigns from 2008 to 2012. The Denison drill hole database and Mineral Resource estimate have been audited by RPA. Table 1-1 summarizes the Phoenix Deposits Mineral Resource estimate, of which Denison’s share is 60%. The effective date of the Mineral Resource estimate is December 31, 2012.

Denison has interpreted the geology, structure, and mineralization at Phoenix using data from 168 diamond drill holes and developed three dimensional (3D) wireframe models for the A and B Deposits which represent 0.05% U 3 O 8 grade envelopes. The A Deposit and B Deposit wireframes each contain a higher grade (HG) domain within an envelope of lower grade material, resulting in four domains in total.

Based on 165 dry bulk density determinations, Denison developed a formula relating bulk density to grade which was used to assign a density value to each assay. Bulk density values were used to weight grades during the resource estimation process and to convert volume to tonnage.

Composited uranium grade times density (GxD) values and density (D) values were interpolated into each block model domain using an inverse distance squared (ID2) algorithm for each mineralized domain using composites within each domain. Domain boundaries were treated as hard boundaries, so that composites from any given domain could not influence block grades in other domains. Very high grade composites were not capped but grades greater than a designated threshold level for each domain were subject to restricted search ellipse dimensions in order to reduce their influence. Block grade was derived from the interpolated GxD value divided by the interpolated D value for each block. Block tonnage was based on volume times the interpolated D value.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 1-8

| www.rpacan.com

The Mineral Resources for the Phoenix Deposits are classified as Indicated and Inferred based on drill hole spacing and apparent continuity of mineralization.

The A Deposit and B Deposit block models were validated by comparison of domain wireframe volumes with block volumes, visual comparison of composite grades with block grades, comparison of block grades with composite grades used to interpolate grades, and comparison with estimation by a different method.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 1-9

| www.rpacan.com

2 INTRODUCTION

Roscoe Postle Associates Inc. (RPA) was retained by Denison Mines Corp. (Denison) on behalf of the Wheeler River Joint Venture to prepare an independent Technical Report on the Phoenix Uranium Deposits. The purpose of this report is to support a Mineral Resource estimate for the Phoenix A and B Deposits of the Wheeler River Project. The estimate was prepared by Denison and audited by RPA. The Phoenix Deposits are Athabasca Basin unconformity-type uranium deposits. This report has been prepared to conform to NI 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.

Denison is a Toronto-based mining company focused on uranium exploration and development in Canada, Mongolia, and Zambia. Denison is listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (symbol DML) and on the NYSE MKT (symbol DNN).

Denison owns 60% of the Wheeler River Joint Venture, Cameco Corporation owns 30%, and JCU (Canada) Exploration Company Limited owns the remaining 10%. The Wheeler River Project comprises 19 contiguous claims in northern Saskatchewan totalling 11,720 ha.

In addition, Denison’s assets include an interest in one of the four licensed conventional uranium mills in North America – Denison has a 22.5% interest in the McClean Lake mill in Saskatchewan. Denison’s primary exploration properties are located in the eastern side of the Athabasca Basin, along the same geological terrain that hosts all of Canada’s currently producing uranium mines, currently accounting for 23% of global production.

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

This report was prepared by William Roscoe, Ph.D., P.Eng., Principal Geologist, RPA. Dr. Roscoe visited the Property on October 30, 2012 and held discussions with technical personnel in Denison’s Saskatoon office on October 30, 2012.

All geological and sampling data were provided by Denison Mines Corp. Drilling and geological data were generated during the period May 2005 to June 2012. All field activities are currently managed by Denison.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 2-1

| www.rpacan.com

The following Denison personnel have contributed to the geological, geophysical, environmental, and resource estimation sections of this technical report:

| • | Mark Mathisen, P.G. – Director, Project Resources

| • | Steve Blower, P.Geo. – Vice President Exploration

| • | Lawson Forand, P.Geo. – Exploration Manager

| • | Larry Petrie, MSc, P.Geo – Senior Geophysicist

| • | Clark Gamelin, P.Geo – Geologist

| • | Chad Sorba, P.Geo – Geologist

The resource modelling was completed by or under the supervision of Mr. Mark Mathisen of Denison Services (USA) Corp. Specific activities completed were:

| • | Site visit and validation of data available for the resource estimate.

| • | Determination of correlation between assays and radiometric logs used for U 3 O 8 grade estimation.

| • | Compilation of new Phoenix resource models.

| • | Geological interpretation of mineralized zones.

| • | Audit of drill hole database and assay certificates.

| • | Mineral Resource estimation and classification.

| • | Verification of Mineral Resource estimate.

The Denison database and resource estimate were reviewed by William E. Roscoe, Ph.D., P.Eng. RPA Principal Geologist with the assistance of RPA personnel Bart Jordan, P.G., Geologist, and David Ross, P.Geo., Principal Geologist.

The documentation reviewed, and other sources of information, are listed in Section 27 References.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 2-2

| www.rpacan.com

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

Units of measurement used in this report conform to the Imperial system. All currency in this report is US dollars (US$) unless otherwise noted.

a |  | annum |  | kWh |  | kilowatt-hour
A |  | ampere |  | L |  | litre
bbl |  | barrels |  | lb |  | pound
btu |  | British thermal units |  | L/s |  | litres per second
°C |  | degree Celsius |  | m |  | metre
C$ |  | Canadian dollars |  | M |  | mega (million); molar
cal |  | calorie |  | m 2 |  | square metre
cfm |  | cubic feet per minute |  | m 3 |  | cubic metre
cm |  | centimetre |  | µ |  | micron
cm 2 |  | square centimetre |  | MASL |  | metres above sea level
d |  | day |  | µg |  | microgram
dia |  | diameter |  | m 3/h |  | cubic metres per hour
dmt |  | dry metric tonne |  | mi |  | mile
dwt |  | dead-weight ton |  | min |  | minute
°F |  | degree Fahrenheit |  | µm |  | micrometre
ft |  | foot |  | mm |  | millimetre
ft 2 |  | square foot |  | mph |  | miles per hour
ft 3 |  | cubic foot |  | MVA |  | megavolt-amperes
ft/s |  | foot per second |  | MW |  | megawatt
g |  | gram |  | MWh |  | megawatt-hour
G |  | giga (billion) |  | oz |  | Troy ounce (31.1035g)
Gal |  | Imperial gallon |  | oz/st, opt |  | ounce per short ton
g/L |  | gram per litre |  | ppb |  | part per billion
Gpm |  | Imperial gallons per minute |  | ppm |  | part per million
g/t |  | gram per tonne |  | psia |  | pound per square inch absolute
gr/ft 3 |  | grain per cubic foot |  | psig |  | pound per square inch gauge
gr/m 3 |  | grain per cubic metre |  | RL |  | relative elevation
ha |  | hectare |  | s |  | second
hp |  | horsepower |  | st |  | short ton
hr |  | hour |  | stpa |  | short ton per year
Hz |  | hertz |  | stpd |  | short ton per day
in. |  | inch |  | t |  | metric tonne
in 2 |  | square inch |  | tpa |  | metric tonne per year
J |  | joule |  | tpd |  | metric tonne per day
k |  | kilo (thousand) |  | US$ |  | United States dollar
kcal |  | kilocalorie |  | USg |  | United States gallon
kg |  | kilogram |  | USgpm |  | US gallon per minute
km |  | kilometre |  | V |  | volt
km 2 |  | square kilometre |  | W |  | watt
km/h |  | kilometre per hour |  | wmt |  | wet metric tonne
kPa |  | kilopascal |  | wt% |  | weight percent
kVA |  | kilovolt-amperes |  | yd 3 |  | cubic yard
kW |  | kilowatt |  | yr |  | year

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 2-3

| www.rpacan.com

3 RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS

This report has been prepared by Roscoe Postle Associates Inc. (RPA) for Denison Mines Corp. The information, conclusions, opinions, and estimates contained herein are based on:

| • | Information available to RPA at the time of preparation of this report,

| • | Assumptions, conditions, and qualifications as set forth in this report, and

| • | Data, reports, and other information supplied by Denison Mines Corp. and other third party sources.

For the purpose of this report, RPA has relied on ownership information provided by Denison Mines Corp. RPA has not researched property title or mineral rights for the Wheeler River Project and expresses no opinion as to the ownership status of the property.

Except for the purposes legislated under provincial securities laws, any use of this report by any third party is at that party’s sole risk.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 3-1

| www.rpacan.com

4 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION

PROPERTY LOCATION

The Phoenix Deposits are located within the Wheeler River Property, which is located in the eastern Athabasca Basin of northern Saskatchewan approximately 600 km north of Saskatoon, 260 km north of La Ronge and 110 km southwest of Points North Landing, in northern Saskatchewan (Figure 4-1). The center of the Property is located approximately 35 km north-northeast of the Key Lake mill and 35 km southwest of the McArthur River mine, which are operated by Cameco Corporation (Cameco). The Property straddles the boundaries of NTS map sheets 74H-5, 6, 11 and 12. The UTM coordinates of the approximate center of the property are 475,000E and 6,370,000N (NAD83, Zone 13N).

LAND TENURE

The Wheeler River Property comprises 19 contiguous claims held as a Joint Venture among Denison (60%), Cameco (30%), and JCU (Canada) Exploration Co. Ltd. (10%) with no back-in rights or royalties that need to be paid. The claims are shown in Figure 4-2 and listed in Table 4-1. Denison has been the operator of the property since November 10, 2004.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 4-1

| www.rpacan.com

TABLE 4-1 LAND TENURE DETAILS

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits

Disposition # |  | Hectares |  |  | Annual Assessment ($) |  |  | Excess Credit ($) |  |  | Years Protected |
S-97677 |  |  | 322 |  |  |  | 8,050 |  |  |  | 161,000 |  |  |  | 20 |
S-97678 |  |  | 335 |  |  |  | 8,375 |  |  |  | 167,500 |  |  |  | 20 |
S-97690 |  |  | 1,087 |  |  |  | 27,175 |  |  |  | 543,500 |  |  |  | 20 |
S-97894 |  |  | 246 |  |  |  | 6,150 |  |  |  | 123,000 |  |  |  | 20 |
S-97895 |  |  | 314 |  |  |  | 7,850 |  |  |  | 157,000 |  |  |  | 20 |
S-97896 |  |  | 356 |  |  |  | 8,900 |  |  |  | 178,000 |  |  |  | 20 |
S-97897 |  |  | 524 |  |  |  | 13,100 |  |  |  | 262,000 |  |  |  | 20 |
S-97907 |  |  | 352 |  |  |  | 8,800 |  |  |  | 176,000 |  |  |  | 20 |
S-97908 |  |  | 1,619 |  |  |  | 40,475 |  |  |  | 809,500 |  |  |  | 20 |
S-97909 |  |  | 1,036 |  |  |  | 25,900 |  |  |  | 518,000 |  |  |  | 20 |
S-98339 |  |  | 362 |  |  |  | 9,050 |  |  |  | 181,000 |  |  |  | 20 |
S-98340 |  |  | 250 |  |  |  | 6,250 |  |  |  | 125,000 |  |  |  | 20 |
S-98341 |  |  | 802 |  |  |  | 20,050 |  |  |  | 401,000 |  |  |  | 20 |
S-98342 |  |  | 1,016 |  |  |  | 25,400 |  |  |  | 508,000 |  |  |  | 20 |
S-98343 |  |  | 362 |  |  |  | 9,050 |  |  |  | 181,000 |  |  |  | 20 |
S-98347 |  |  | 939 |  |  |  | 23,475 |  |  |  | 469,500 |  |  |  | 20 |
S-98348 |  |  | 951 |  |  |  | 23,775 |  |  |  | 475,500 |  |  |  | 20 |
S-98349 |  |  | 540 |  |  |  | 13,500 |  |  |  | 270,000 |  |  |  | 20 |
S-98350 |  |  | 307 |  |  |  | 7,675 |  |  |  | 153,500 |  |  |  | 20 |

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 4-2

| www.rpacan.com

www.rpacan.com

Legend:

Provincial Capital

Other Populated Areas

Trans-Canada Highway

Major Road

International Boundary

Provincial Boundary

050

100 150 200 250

Kilometres

Figure 4-1

Denison Mines Corp.

Phoenix Deposits

Northern Saskatchewan, Canada

Wheeler River Property

Location Map

December 2012

Source: Natural Resources Canada.

4-3

| www.rpacan.com

4-4

| www.rpacan.com

5 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY

ACCESSIBILITY

Access to the Phoenix Deposits is by road, helicopter, or fixed wing aircraft from Saskatoon. Vehicle access to the Property is by Highway 914, which terminates at the Key Lake mill. The ore haul road between the Key Lake and McArthur River operations lies within the eastern part of the Property. An older access road, the Fox Lake Road, between Key Lake and McArthur River provides access to most of the northwestern side of the Property. Gravel and sand roads and drill trails provide access by either four-wheel-drive or all-terrain-vehicle to the rest of the Property.

CLIMATE

The climate is typical of the continental sub-arctic region of northern Saskatchewan, with temperatures ranging from +32°C in summer to -45°C in winter. Winters are long and cold, with mean monthly temperatures below freezing for seven months of the year. Winter snow pack averages 70 cm to 90 cm. Lake ice forms by mid-October and usually melts by mid-April. Field operations are possible year round with the exception of limitations imposed by lakes and swamps and the periods of break-up and freeze-up.

Freezing of surrounding lakes, in most years, begins in November and breakup occurs around the middle of May. The average frost-free period is approximately 90 days.

Average annual total precipitation for the region is approximately 450 mm, of which 70% falls as rain, with more than half occurring from June to September. Snow may occur in all months but rarely falls in July or August. The prevailing annual wind direction is from the west with a mean speed of 12 km/hr.

LOCAL RESOURCES AND INFRASTRUCTURE

La Ronge is the nearest commercial/urban center where most exploration supplies and services can be obtained. Two airlines offer daily, scheduled flight services between Saskatoon and La Ronge (located roughly 600 km and 260 km respectively south from the project site). Most company employees are on a two week-in and two week-off schedule. Contractor employees are generally on a longer work schedule.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 5-1

| www.rpacan.com

As noted previously, the Phoenix Deposits are well located with respect to all weather roads and the provincial power grid. Most significantly, the operating Key Lake mill complex, owned and operated by Cameco is approximately 35 km south of the Property.

Field operations are currently conducted from Denison’s Wheeler River camp, three kilometers southwest of the Phoenix Deposits (Figure 4-2). The camp, which is operated by Denison, provides accommodations for up to forty exploration personnel. Fuel and miscellaneous supplies are stored in existing warehouse and tank facilities at the camp. The site generates its own power. Abundant water is available from the numerous lakes and rivers in the area.

PHYSIOGRAPHY

The Property is characterized by a relatively flat till plain with elevations ranging from 477 m to 490 m above sea level (MASL). Throughout the area, there is a distinctive northeasterly trend to landforms resulting from the passage of Pleistocene glacial ice from the northeast to the southwest. The topography and vegetation at the Phoenix Deposits are typical of the taiga forested land common to the Athabasca Basin area of northern Saskatchewan.

The area is covered with 30 m to 50 m of overburden. The terrain is gently rolling and characterized by forested sand and dunes. Vegetation is dominated by black spruce and jack pine, with occasional small stands of white birch occurring in more productive and well-drained areas. Lowlands are generally well drained, but also can contain some muskeg and poorly drained bog areas with vegetation varying from wet, open, non-treed vistas to variable density stands of primarily black spruce as well as tamarack depending on moisture and soil conditions. Lichen growth is common in this boreal landscape mostly associated with mature coniferous stands and bogs.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 5-2

| www.rpacan.com

6 HISTORY

OWNERSHIP

The Wheeler River Property was staked on July 6, 1977, due to its proximity to the Key Lake uranium discoveries, and was vended into an agreement on December 28, 1978 among AGIP Canada Ltd. (AGIP), E&B Explorations Ltd. (E&B), and Saskatchewan Mining Development Corporation (SMDC), with each holding a one-third interest. On July 31, 1984, all parties divested a 13.3% interest and allowed Denison Mines Limited, a predecessor company to Denison Mines Corp., to earn a 40% interest. On December 1, 1986, E&B allowed PNC Exploration (Canada) Co. Ltd. (PNC) to earn a 10% interest from one-half of its 20% interest. In the early 1990s, AGIP sold its 20% interest to Cameco, which was a successor to SMDC. In 1996, Imperial Metals Corporation, a successor to E&B, sold an 8% interest to Cameco and a 2% interest to PNC. Participating interests in 2004 were Cameco (48%), JCU (a successor to PNC, 12%), and Denison (40%).

In late 2004, Denison entered into an agreement to earn a further 20% interest by expending $7 million within six years. In November 2004, Denison became the operator of the Wheeler River Joint Venture. When the earn-in obligations were completed; the participating interests were Denison-60%, Cameco-30%, and JCU-10%. Since November 2004, Denison has been the project operator.

EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT HISTORY

Except for the years 1990-1994, exploration activities comprising airborne and ground geophysical surveys, geochemical surveys, prospecting and diamond drilling have been carried out on the Wheeler River Property continuously from 1978 to present.

Subsequent to the discovery of the Key Lake mine in 1975-1976, the Key Lake exploration model (Dahlkamp and Tan 1977) has emphasized the spatial association between uranium deposition at, immediately above, or immediately below the unconformity with graphitic pelite units in the basement subcrop under the basal Athabasca sandstone. The graphitic pelite units are commonly intensely sheared and are highly conductive in contrast to the physically more competent adjoining rock types that include semipelite, psammite, meta-arkose, or granitoid gneiss. From the late 1970s to the present, the Key Lake model has been useful in discovering blind uranium deposits throughout the Athabasca Basin (Jefferson, et al. 2007); although it is worth noting that the vast majority of electromagnetic (EM) conductors are unmineralized.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 6-1

| www.rpacan.com

Following the Key Lake exploration model, EM techniques were the early geophysical methods of choice for the Wheeler River Property area during the period 1978-2004 and over 152 line-kilometres of conductors have been delineated on the Property. These conductive units have been delineated to depths of 1,000 m, through the quartz-rich Athabasca Group sandstones that are effectively transparent from an EM perspective.

These conductors or conductor systems were assigned a unique designation and follow-up exploration drilling successfully identified several zones of uranium mineralization.

In 1982 AGIP discovered the MAW Zone. This alteration system contains rare earth element (REE) mineralization in a structurally disrupted zone which extends from the unconformity to the present surface. There is no evidence of uranium mineralization. The REE mineralization contains yttrium values greater than 2.0%, boron values up to 2.5%, and total rare earth oxide (REO) up to 8.1% .

In 1986 SMDC intersected uranium mineralization associated with Ni-Co-As sulphides at the unconformity in the M Zone (DDH ZM-10, 0.79% U 3 O 8 over 5.75 m), and also discovered uranium mineralization at the O Zone. The O Zone mineralization was associated with a 72 m vertical unconformity offset. The O Zone basement-hosted mineralization grades 0.048% U 3 O 8 over 0.9 m at 378.8 m in drill hole ZO-02.

In 1988 Cameco intersected weak basement-hosted mineralization in two holes in the K Zone. Drill hole ZK-04 reported 0.08% U 3 O 8 over 2.4 m at 580.0 m and 0.19% U 3 O 8 over 2.3 m at 587.7 m, and drill hole ZK-06 returned 0.17% U 3 O 8 over 7.7 m at 532.0 m and 0.06% U 3 O 8 over 4.4 m at 564.6 m.

From 1995 to 1997, exploration by Cameco identified strong alteration and illitic and dravitic geochemical enrichment associated with major structures in both the sandstone and the basement and a significant unconformity offset. The unconformity offset is associated with what had been identified as a major geological unit termed the “quartzite ridge” which had been delineated as a result of drilling the Q conductor system.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 6-2

| www.rpacan.com

In 1998, further drilling was carried out at the Q Zone and also at the R Zone (the Phoenix deposit area). At the latter, two drill holes were abandoned in sandstone due to quartz dissolution (desilicification). The possibility that this sandstone alteration might be of significance was not emphasized at the time.

In 1999, a geological setting similar to McArthur River’s P2 trend was intersected at the WC Zone, where faulted graphite-pyrite pelitic gneiss overlay the quartzite ridge. The former operator (Cameco) noted extensive dravite (boron) alteration in the overlying sandstones.

In 2002, drill hole WR-185 intersected a 175 m unconformity offset along the west contact of the quartzite ridge. This area was the initial focus of the Wheeler River Joint Venture after Denison became operator in 2004.

In 2003, 61 shallow reverse circulation holes were drilled, targeting the sandstone/overburden interface exploring for alteration zones in the upper sandstone. No anomalies were detected. Drill hole WR-190A tested the WS UTEM conductor and was abandoned at 364 m due to deteriorating drilling conditions. This drill hole is located only 90 m from the eventual Phoenix discovery drill hole WR-249. Noticeable desilicification and bleaching of the sandstone were present, but no noteworthy geochemical anomalies were identified. A direct current (DC) resistivity survey was also completed to map trends of alteration within the Athabasca sandstones and underlying basement rocks that might be related to uranium mineralization.

In November 2004, Denison became operator of the Wheeler River Joint Venture and in 2005 carried out property-wide airborne Fugro GEOTEM and Falcon Gravity surveys with five subsequent ground TEM grids completed on GEOTEM anomalies. The focus for Denison, based on a McArthur River analogy, was the quartzite ridge, particularly the west area, or footwall side of the quartzite ridge. Several small regional campaigns were carried out to test EM conductors located by airborne and ground geophysical surveys.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 6-3

| www.rpacan.com

Although 2007 drilling on various 2003 resistivity anomalies did not discover any significant uranium mineralization, there was some support for the concept that resistivity did “map” alteration chimneys within the Athabasca sandstone. Alteration chimneys in the Athabasca sandstone above the unconformity or basement-hosted uranium mineralization have been described from almost all Athabasca Basin uranium deposits, following the first thorough description of their occurrence at the McClean deposits (Saracoglu, et al. 1983) (Wallis, et al. 1984). The chimneys nearly always have a prominent structural component consisting of broken and rotated sandstone and a high degree of fracturing and brecciation. These structural features are accompanied by alteration consisting of variable amounts of bleaching (removal of diagenetic hematite), silicification, desilification, druzy quartz-lined fractures, secondary hematite, dravite, and/or clay minerals.

In 2007 a 154.8 line-km geophysical IP and MT survey using Titan 24 DC resistivity technology was undertaken with the prime goals being the extension of Cameco’s 2003 resistivity survey, surveying of the K and M zones and exploration of the REa or “Millennium” (WS zone) zone, which appeared to have attractive geological features in an underexplored part of the Property. The results showed the following:

| • | A very strong resistivity high which delineated the quartzite unit.

| • | Two strong, well defined resistivity lows both occurring in areas where previous drill holes had been lost in the Athabasca sandstone.

| • | Well defined resistivity chimneys.

During the winter and spring of 2008, the North Grid resistivity survey data was reinterpreted and three drill targets, A, B, and C were proposed. These targets were well defined alteration or resistivity chimneys situated close to the hanging wall of the quartzite unit in areas where previous attempts to drill ground EM conductors (the WS and the REA) had failed to reach the unconformity.

Drill hole WR-249 in 2008 is considered to be the discovery hole for the Phoenix A Deposit. Subsequent drilling has identified four mineralized zones over a strike length of more than one kilometre: Phoenix A Deposit, Phoenix B Deposit, Phoenix C Target, and Phoenix D Target. Drilling on the Phoenix Deposits is described in Section 10.

An initial Mineral Resource estimate was reported for the Phoenix A and B Deposits in a NI 43-101 Technical Report by SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. (SRK) dated November 17, 2010 (Table 6-1). This Mineral Resource estimate is superseded by the Mineral Resource reported in the current RPA report, which uses additional drilling since 2010.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 6-4

| www.rpacan.com

TABLE 6-1 2010 SRK MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits

Deposit |  | Classification |  | Tonnes (000 ) |  |  | Lbs U3 O 8 (000 ) |  |  | Average Grade (%U3 O 8) |
A Deposit |  | Indicated |  |  | 89.9 |  |  |  | 35,638 |  |  |  | 18.0 |
B Deposit |  | Inferred |  |  | 23.8 |  |  |  | 3,811 |  |  |  | 7.3 |

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 6-5

| www.rpacan.com

7 GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND MINERALIZATION

Portions of the following geological descriptions are taken from internal Denison reports of 2009-2012.

REGIONAL GEOLOGY

GENERAL

The Phoenix uranium deposits are located near the southeastern margin of the Athabasca Basin in the southwest part of the Churchill Structural Province of the Canadian Shield (Figure 7-1). The Athabasca Basin is a broad, closed, and elliptically shaped, cratonic basin with an area of 425 km (east-west) by 225 km (north-south). The bedrock geology of the area consists of Archean and Paleo-Proterozoic gneisses unconformably overlain by up to 1,500 m of flat-lying, unmetamorphosed sandstones and conglomerates of the mid-Proterozoic Athabasca Group. The Wheeler River project is located near the transition zone between two prominent litho-structural domains within the Precambrian basement, the Mudjatik Domain to the west and the Wollaston Domain to the east.

The Mudjatik Domain is characterized by elliptical domes of Archean granitoid orthogenesis separated by keels of metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks, whereas Wollaston Domain is characterized by tight to isoclinal, northeasterly trending, doubly plunging folds developed in Paleoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks of the Wollaston Supergroup (Yeo and Delaney 2007), which overlie Archean granitoid orthogenesis identical to those of Mudjatik Domain.

The area is cut by a major northeast-striking fault system of Hudsonian Age. The faults occur predominantly in the basement rocks but often extend up into the Athabasca Group due to several periods of post-depositional movement. Diabase sills and dikes up to 100 m in width and frequently associated with the faulting have intruded into both the Athabasca rocks and the underlying basement.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 7-1

| www.rpacan.com

THE METAMORPHOSED BASEMENT

The basement rocks underlying the Athabasca Group have been divided into three tectonic domains: the Western Craton, the Cree Lake Mobile Zone, and the Rottenstone Complex (Figures 7-1 and 7-2). The central Cree Lake Mobile Zone is bounded in the northwest by the Virgin River Shear and Black Lake Fault and in the southeast by the Needle Falls Shear Zone.

The Cree Lake Mobile Zone has been further subdivided into the Mudjatik Domain in the west half and the Wollaston Domain in the east half. The lithostructural character of these domains is the result of the Hudsonian Orogeny in which an intense thermo-tectonic period remobilized the Archean age rocks and led to intensive folding of the overlying Aphebian-age supracrustal metasedimentary units. The Mudjatik domain represents the orogenic core and comprises non-linear, felsic, granitoid to gneissic rocks surrounded by subordinate thin gneissic supracrustal units. These rocks, which have reached granulite-facies metamorphic grades, usually occur as broad domal features. The adjacent Wollaston Domain consists of Archean granitoid gneisses overlain by an assemblage of Aphebian pelitic, semipelitic, and arkosic gneisses, with minor interlayered calc-silicate rocks and quartzites. These rocks are overlain by an upper assemblage of semipelitic and arkosic gneisses with magnetite bearing units.

The Wollaston Domain basement rocks are unconformably overlain by flat lying, unmetamorphosed sandstones, and conglomerates of the Helikian age Athabasca Group, which is a major aquifer in the area.

THE ATHABASCA GROUP

The Athabasca Group sediments consist of unmetamorphosed pink to maroon quartz-rich pebbly conglomerate and red siltstone of the Read Formation and maroon quartz pebble conglomerate, maroon to white pebbly sandstone, sandstone and clay-clast-bearing sandstone belonging to the Manitou Falls Formation. The sandstone is poorly sorted near the base, where conglomerates form discontinuous layers of variable thickness. Minor shale and siltstone occur in the upper half of the succession. Locally, the rocks may be silicified and indurated or partly altered to clay and softened. In spite of their simple composition, their diagenetic history is complex (Jefferson, et al. 2007). The predominant regional background clay is dickite.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 7-2

| www.rpacan.com

The basin is interpreted to have developed from a series of early northeast-trending fault-bounded sub-basins that coalesced. The topographic profile of the unconformity suggests a gentle inward slope in the east, moderate to steep slopes in the north and south and a steeper slope in the west.

The Manitou Falls Formation, which underlies most of the eastern part of the basin (Figure 7-2), is further subdivided into four members from bottom to top:

| • | Read Formation (formerly the MFa Member) – a sequence of poorly sorted sandstone and minor conglomerate;

| • | Bird Member (MFb) – interbedded sandstone and conglomerate distinguished from the underlying MFa and overlying MFc by the presence of at least 1% to 2% conglomerate in beds thicker than 2 cm;

| • | Collins Member (MFc) – a sandstone with rare clay intraclasts;

| • | Dunlop Member (MFd) – a fine-grained sandstone with abundant (>1%) clay intraclasts.

In the eastern Athabasca Basin, Quaternary deposits up to 100 m thick drape bedrock topography of ridges, typically associated with granitic gneiss domes, and structurally controlled valleys (Campbell 2007). At least three tills, locally separated by stratified gravel, sand, and silt, can be distinguished. The dominant ice-flow direction was southwesterly, but a late glacial re-advance was southerly in eastern parts of the basin and westerly along its northern edge.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 7-3

| www.rpacan.com

N

025

50

75

100

Kilometres

[Graphic Appears Here]

[Graphic Appears Here]

[Graphic Appears Here]

Figure 7-1

Legend:

Denison Mines Corp.

Phanerozoic

Road

Athabasca Group (Helikian)

Major Shear Zone

Phoenix Deposits

Pre-Athabasca Basement

Faults

Northern Saskatchewan, Canada

Uranium Deposits

Regional Geology and

Source: From Saskatchewan Ministry of Energy and Resources, 2009.

Uranium Deposits

December 2012

74-

7-4

| www.rpacan.com

NOTE: Crystalline basement domains are labeled in bold text. The sub-unit of the Manitou Falls Formation labeled “*” in the legend corresponds to the Warnes and Raible members, which internger with the Bird (MFb) Member in southern and northern Athabasca Basin respectively.

Figure 7-2

Denison Mines Corp.

Phoenix Deposits

Northern Saskatchewan, Canada

Simplified Geological Map of

Athabasca Basin

December 2012

Source:EXTECH IV.

7-5

7-5

| www.rpacan.com

LOCAL AND PROPERTY GEOLOGY

The Wheeler River Property lies in the eastern part of the Athabasca Basin where undeformed, late Paleoproterozoic to Mesoproterozoic sandstone, conglomerate, and mudstone of the Athabasca Group unconformably overlie early Paleoproterozoic and Archean crystalline basement rocks. Mineralization at Phoenix generally occurs at depths ranging from 390 m to 420 m and is interpreted to be structurally controlled by the northeast-southwest trending (055º azimuth) WS fault which dips 55º to the southeast.

The local geology of the Wheeler River Property is very much consistent with the regional geology described above with the following units from top to bottom.

QUATERNARY DEPOSITS

The Property is partially covered by lakes and muskeg, which overlie a complex succession of glacial deposits up to 120 m in thickness These include eskers and outwash sand plains, well-developed drumlins, till plains, and glaciofluvial plain deposits (Campbell, 2007). The orientation of the drumlins reflects southwesterly ice flow.

ATHABASCA GROUP

Little-deformed late Paleoproterozoic to Mesoproterozoic Athabasca Group strata comprised of Manitou Falls Formation sandstones and conglomerates unconformably overlie the crystalline basement and have a considerable range (Figure 7-3) from 170 m over the quartzite ridge to at least 560 m on the western side of the Property.

The Manitou Falls Formation is locally separated from the underlying Read Formation (formerly the MFa) by a paraconformity, and comprises three units, the Bird Member (MFb), Collins Member (MFc), and Dunlop Member (MFd), which are differentiated based on conglomerates and clay intraclasts (Bosman and Korness 2007) (Ramaekers, et al. 2007). Thickness of the Read Formation ranges from zero meters at the north end of the property and over parts of the quartzite ridge to 200 m west of the quartzite ridge. The thickness of the MFb, which is absent above the quartzite ridge, is as much as 210 m in the northeastern part of the Property. The MFc unit is a relatively clean sandstone with locally scattered granules or pebbles and one-pebble-thick conglomerate layers interpreted to be pebble lag deposits. The MFc ranges in thickness from 30 m to 150 m. The MFd is distinguished from the underlying MFc sandstone by the presence of at least 0.6% clay intraclasts (Bosman and Korness, 2007). The MFd is as thick as 140 m. The upper 100 m to 140 m of sandstone is typically buff colored, medium- to coarse-grained, quartz rich and cemented by silica, kaolinite, illite, sericite, or hematite. Alteration of the sandstone is noted along much of the Phoenix Deposit trend.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 7-6

| www.rpacan.com

Variations in thickness of the Athabasca sub-units reflect syndepositional subsidence. In particular, the thinning of the Read Formation towards the quartzite ridge, and the absence of both the Read and the MFb Member over much of the ridge, indicate syn-Read uplift of the latter along the thrust fault that bounds it to the west. This is supported by the Read Formation sedimentary breccia, interpreted as a fault-scarp talus deposit, along the western margin of the ridge.

Although the predominant regional background clay in the Athabasca Basin is dickite, the Wheeler River Property lies within a broad illite anomaly trending northeasterly from Key Lake through the McArthur River area (Earle and Sopuck 1989). Chlorite and dravite are also relatively common in sandstones within this zone.

The topography of the sub-Athabasca basement varies dramatically across the Property. From elevations of 160 MASL to 230 MASL along its southeastern edge, the unconformity rises gently to a pronounced northeasterly trending ridge up to 350 MASL, coincident with the subcrop of a quartzite unit in the crystalline basement. The unconformity surface drops steeply westward to as low as 30 MBSL. The unconformity surface is less variable in the northern part of the Property, ranging from 40 MASL in the northeast to 200 MASL in the northwest.

The west side of the quartzite unit forms a prominent topographic scarp, rising up to 200 m above the Athabasca sandstone lying to the west. A breccia of angular quartzite blocks, centimetres to metres in size, with a finely-laminated sandstone matrix, has been intersected in numerous drill holes along the western margin (footwall) of the quartzite ridge. The quartzite breccia is often intimately associated with uranium mineralization that occurs at numerous locations along the footwall of the quartzite unit.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 7-7

| www.rpacan.com

The Athabasca sandstones were deposited as a succession of sandy and gravelly braided river deposits in westward-flowing streams. The conglomerates typical of MFb indicate increased stream competence, due either to increased flow (i.e. higher precipitation) or increased subsidence. The mud chips typical of MFd are fragments of thin mud beds deposited from suspension during the late stages of a flood and re-worked by the next one. Hence, they indicate intermittent, possibly seasonal, stream flow (Liu, et al. 2011).

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 7-8

| www.rpacan.com

NW

ZR-13A

MFd

MFc

MFb

Read

Formation

Pelite

Graphitic Pelite Garnetiferous Pelite Quartzite

December 2012

SE

Elevation

(metres above sea level)

WR-267 WR-249 WR-190A

Present Surface

Overburden

Denison Mines Corp.

Phoenix Deposits

Northern Saskatchewan, Canada

Schematic Section ofAthabasca and Basement Rock Types

Source:Denison Mines Corp., 2012.

7-9

7-9

| www.rpacan.com

BASEMENT GEOLOGY

Basement rocks beneath the Phoenix Deposits are part of the Wollaston Domain and are comprised of metasedimentary and granitoid gneisses (Figure 7-4). The metasedimentary rocks belong to the Wollaston Supergroup and include graphitic and non-graphitic pelitic and semipelitic gneisses, meta-quartzite, and rare calc-silicate rocks together with felsic and quartz feldspathic granitoid gneisses. These metasedimentary rocks are interpreted to belong to the Daly Lake Group (Yeo and Delaney, 2007). Pegmatitic segregations and intrusions are common in all units with garnet, cordierite, and sillimanite occurring in the pelitic strata, indicating an upper amphibolite grade of metamorphism.

The quartzite ridge, an interpreted impermeable and structural barrier forming the footwall to the mineralization (Figure 7-5), dominates the basement geology of the Phoenix Deposits. The quartzite unit exhibits variable dips from 45º to 75º to the southeast, averaging 50º, and with an undulating, but generally 055º azimuth. Immediately overlying the quartzite is a garnetiferous pelite, which varies from seven metres to 60 m in thickness. This generally competent and unmineralized unit contains distinctive porphyroblastic garnets and acts as a marker horizon. Overlying the garnetiferous pelite is a graphitic pelite in which the graphite content varies from 1% to 40%. The graphitic pelite is approximately five metres wide in the southwest, increases to approximately 70 m near drill hole WR-249, and is 50 m wide at the northeast extremity. Overlying the graphitic pelite is a massive, non-graphitic, unaltered pelite unit.

Graphitic pelite and quartzite units appear to play important roles in the genesis of Athabasca Basin unconformity-type deposits (Jefferson, et al. 2007). Thus the presence of extensive subcrop of both units: 18 km of quartzite and 152 line-km of conductors (assumed to be graphitic pelite), greatly enhances the economic potential of the Wheeler River Property.

All of these rock types have a low magnetic susceptibility. The metasedimentary rocks are flanked by and intercalated with granitoid gneisses, some of which have a relatively high magnetic susceptibility. Some of these granitoid gneisses are Archean (Card, et al. 2007). Prior to extensive drilling, interpretation of basement “geology” depends heavily on airborne magnetic data combined with airborne and ground EM interpretation.

A “Paleoweathered Zone”, generally between three to ten metres thick, is superimposed on the crystalline rocks and occurs immediately below the unconformity.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 7-10

| www.rpacan.com

7-11

| www.rpacan.com

Phoenix

Deposits

Quartzite Breccia

Thrust

Graphitic Pelite

Shear

Semipelitic Gneiss with

Graphitic Pelite Interlayers

Quartzite

Granitoid Gneiss

Figure 7-5

Denison Mines Corp.

Phoenix Deposits

Northern Saskatchewan, Canada

Schematic of the

Quartzite Ridge

December 2012

Source:Denison Mines Corp., 2010.

7-12

| www.rpacan.com

STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY

The Wheeler River Property lies in the Wollaston Domain, a northeast-trending fold and thrust belt with recumbently folded, early Paleoproterozoic, Wollaston Supergroup metasedimentary rocks intercalated with granitoid gneisses, some of which are of Archean age.

Numerous hypothetical structural models have been proposed for the Wheeler River Property. The most simple is to infer a southeast dipping homocline. The presence of mechanically competent quartzite units, as well as the bounding units of competent granitoid gneiss, together with the many kilometers of relatively incompetent graphitic pelite provides a situation for the extensive development of thrust and strike slip/wrench fault tectonics, as well as later normal faults, at competent/incompetent interfaces (Liu, et al. 2011).

The major structural feature of the Phoenix Deposits is the northeast-southwest trending (055º azimuth) WS reverse fault which dips 55º to the southeast and lies within or at the base of the graphitic pelite unit along the western edge (footwall) of the quartzite ridge, which appears to have acted as a buttress for thrusting and reverse faulting (Kerr 2010) (Kerr, Gamelin, et al. 2011). Deformation within the WS shear has occurred partly by ductile shearing, but mainly by fracturing. A progressive sequence of fracturing is evident by variations in the strike and dip of slickensides. The principal stress directions responsible for early deformation were northwest-southeast. A change in the principal stress to an east-west direction led to later strike-slip movement along the WS shear. Later extension is indicated by northwest-striking normal faults, which dip steeply to the southwest.

With the limited data currently available it appears that the WS structure was most active during deposition of the Read Formation, however, continued uplift is indicated by westward tilting of MFc strata along the fault zone. Reverse fault displacements on the western edge of the quartzite ridge occurred primarily within the highly resistant quartzite unit. Within the Wheeler River area, vertical offset on the footwall of the quartzite unit can be as much as 60 m; however, in the Phoenix Deposits, known vertical displacements in the hanging wall sequence are always less than 10 m (Figure 7-6).

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 7-13

| www.rpacan.com

Mineralization hosted in the lower 15 m of the Athabasca sandstone appears to have some relationship to the extensions of the WS shear and its various hanging wall splays; hence, movement on these faults must have continued after deposition of rocks of the Read Formation and probably the MFd member of the Manitou Falls Formation. The WS shear and its various interpreted hanging wall splays may have been the main conduit for the mineralizing fluids. Thus determining favourable locations along the WS shear, where zones of long-lived permeability are present, is of critical importance. A northwesterly trending diabase dyke, probably part of the 1.27 Ga Mackenzie dyke swarm, cuts across the sandstones on the northern part of the Property.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 7-14

| www.rpacan.com

[Graphic Appears Here] Pelite Graphitic Pelite Garnetiferous Pelite Quartzite Shear Zones/ Reverse Faults Figure 7-6 Denison Mines Corp. 05 10 15 20 Phoenix Deposits Metres Northern Saskatchewan, Canada WS Reverse Fault Offset of the Unconformity December 2012 Source: Denison Mines Corp., 2010.

7-15

| www.rpacan.com

URANIUM MINERALIZATION

TYPE OF MINERALIZATION

Uranium mineralization is in the form of the oxide uraninite/pitchblende (U 3 O 8). Values of all accompanying metals are low, particularly in comparison with several sandstone-hosted deposits, which can have very high values for Ni, Co, and As (Jefferson, et al. 2007). For example, drill hole WR-273, from 406.0 m to 406.5 m, assays 78.3% U 3 O 8 , 35 ppm Ni, 30 ppm Co, 0.05 ppm As, 26 ppm Zn, 221 ppm Ag, 284 ppm Cu, and 9.83% Pb. Some intersections can have significantly higher values for many trace elements, e.g., drill hole WR-287, from 408.5 m to 409.0 m, assays 26.8% U 3 O 8, 461 ppm Ni, 119 ppm Co, 170 ppm As, 1,070 ppm Zn, 11.2 ppm Ag, 3,200 ppm Cu, and 2.25% Pb.

ALTERATION

Alteration is typical unconformity-associated style, with a form and nature similar to other Athabasca Basin deposits. The sandstones are altered for as much as 200 m above the unconformity (Figures 7-7 and 7-8), and exhibit varying degrees of silicification and desilicification (which causes many technical drilling problems), as well as dravitization, chloritization, and illitization. In addition, hydrothermal hematite and drusy quartz are present in the sandstone and often in the basement rocks. Alteration is focussed along structures propagating upward from the WS shear and associated splays, and probably does not exceed 100 m width across strike, making this a relatively narrow target. The basement in the northeast part of the Phoenix Deposits is much more extensively bleached and clay altered than that to the southwest.

DISTRIBUTION OF URANIUM MINERALIZATION AT PHOENIX

The mineralization in the Phoenix Deposits occurs at the unconformity contact between sandstone of the Athabasca group and underlying lower Proterozoic Wollaston Group metasedimentary rocks.

Mineralization and alteration have been traced over a strike length of approximately one kilometre. Since the discovery hole WR-249 was drilled in 2008, 238 drill holes have reached the target depth, delineating two distinct zones (A Deposit and B Deposit) of high-grade mineralization.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 7-16

| www.rpacan.com

8 DEPOSIT TYPES

The Phoenix Deposits are Athabasca Basin unconformity-type uranium deposits. Figure 8-1 shows a general schematic of unconformity-type uranium deposits. Jefferson et al. (2007) offered the following definition for the geological environment of this type of mineralization.

Unconformity-associated uranium deposits are pods, veins, and semi-massive replacements consisting of mainly uraninite, close to basal unconformities, in particular those between Proterozoic conglomeratic sandstone basins and metamorphosed basement rocks. Prospective basins in Canada are filled by thin, relatively flat-lying, and apparently unmetamorphosed but pervasively altered, Proterozoic (~1.8 Ga to <1.55 Ga), mainly fluvial, red-bed quartzose conglomerate, sandstone, and mudstone. The basement gneiss was intensely weathered and deeply eroded with variably preserved thicknesses of reddened, clay-altered, hematitic regolith grading down through a green chloritic zone into fresh rock. The basement rocks typically comprise highly metamorphosed interleaved Archean to Paleoproterozoic granitoid and supracrustal gneiss including graphitic metapelite that hosts many of the uranium deposits. The bulk of the U-Pb isochron ages on uraninite are in the range of 1600 Ma to 1350 Ma. Monometallic, generally basement-hosted uraninite fills veins, breccia fillings, and replacements in fault zones. Polymetallic, commonly subhorizontal, semi-massive replacement uraninite forms lenses just above or straddling the unconformity, with variable amounts of uranium, nickel, cobalt and arsenic; and traces of gold, platinum-group elements, copper, rare-earth elements and iron.

The uranium deposits in the Athabasca Basin occur below, across and immediately above the unconformity, which can lie within a few metres of surface at the rim of the Basin, to over 1,000 m deep near its centre. The deposits formed by extensive hydrothermal systems occurring at the unconformity’s structural boundary between the older and younger rock units. Major deep-seated structures are also interpreted to have played an important role in the hydrothermal process, likely acting as conduits for hot mineralized fluids that eventually pooled and crystallized in the structural traps provided by the unconformity. One of the necessary reducing fluids originates in the basement, and flows along basement faults. A second, oxidizing fluid originates within the Athabasca sandstone stratigraphy and migrates through the inherent porosity. In appropriate circumstances, these two fluids mix and precipitate uranium in a structural trap at or near the basal Athabasca- unconformity with basement rocks.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 8-1

| www.rpacan.com

Two end-members of the deposit model have been defined (Quirt 2003). A sandstone-hosted egress-type model (e.g., Phoenix) involved the mixing of oxidized, sandstone brine with relatively reduced fluids issuing from the basement into the sandstone. Basement-hosted, ingress-type deposits (e.g., Rabbit Lake) formed by fluid-rock reactions between oxidizing sandstone brine entering basement fault zones and the local wall rock. Both types of mineralization and associated host-rock alteration occurred at sites of basement–sandstone fluid interaction where a spatially stable redox gradient/front was present.

Although either type of deposit can be high grade, ranging in grade from a few percent to 20% U 3 O 8, they are not physically large and typically occur as narrow, linear lenses at considerable depth. In plain view, the deposits can be 100 m to 150 m long and a few metres to 30 m wide and/or thick. Egress-type deposits tend to be polymetallic (U-Ni-Co-Cu-As) and typically follow the trace of the underlying graphitic pelites and associated faults, along the unconformity. However both the Phoenix and McArthur River deposits have very low concentrations of the accessory (polymetallic) minerals.

Unconformity-type uranium deposits are surrounded by extensive alteration envelopes. In the basement, these envelopes are generally relatively narrow but become broader where they extend upwards into the Athabasca group for tens of metres to even 100 m or more above the unconformity. Hydrothermal alteration is variously marked by chloritization, tourmalinization (high boron, dravite), hematization (several episodes), illitization, silicification/desilicification, and dolomitization (Hoeve, 1984). Modern exploration for these types of deposits relies heavily on deep-penetrating geophysics and down-hole geochemistry.

The geology of the Phoenix deposit area and the controls on mineralization are sufficiently well understood for Mineral Resource estimation.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 8-2

| www.rpacan.com

8-3

| www.rpacan.com

9 EXPLORATION

Since discovery of the McArthur River deposit in 1988, the McArthur River exploration model (McGill, et al. 1993) has emphasized a different association between uranium mineralization and rock type compared to the earlier Key Lake exploration model. At McArthur River, one of the most significant rock types in the basement succession is a massive, homogenous, and competent quartzite. Mechanically, particularly compared to the adjacent layered members of the basement stratigraphy, the quartzite is extremely strong, and thus exerts an important control both in basement and post-Athabasca sandstone structural evolution. Both the footwall and hanging wall contacts of the quartzite unit, particularly where these contacts involve highly incompetent rocks such as graphitic pelite, become sites of major thrust, reverse, and strike-slip faults.

Although these faults are loci for mineralization; the poor conductivity, low magnetic susceptibilities and low density values associated with the quartzite limits the effectiveness of airborne and ground geophysical methods in mapping these basement units especially when they are covered by hundreds of meters of sandstone cover. Another noteworthy characteristic of McArthur River type mineralization is the widespread presence of hydrothermal dravite, indicating boron addition into the overlying Athabasca sandstone above the quartzite ridge. Thus, borehole geochemistry and drilling are the primary exploration methods.

Exploration up to 2008 is described in Section 6 History. Further details of geophysical exploration since 2008 are provided below.

Following the discovery of the Phoenix Deposits in 2008, Denison as operator of the Wheeler River Joint Venture completed DC Resistivity/Induced Polarization surveys comprising 67.6 line-km in 2009

During February-March, 2010, a geophysical program consisting of 25.2 km of fixed loop surface transient electromagnetic survey (TEM) coverage, and 51.0 km of step loop transient EM survey coverage were completed on three lines of the previously established 2007 Wheeler River grid. Three lines of step-wise moving loop (SWML) transient electromagnetic (TEM) surveying was completed on three previously defined resistivity anomalies in attempt to better define any conductive axis associated with graphitic basement features that could act as conduits for mineralizing events.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 9-1

| www.rpacan.com

The three lines of SWML were chosen to represent variable or subtle differences in low amplitude resistivity signatures interpreted to be associated with breaches in sandstone stratigraphy. In particular, the resistivity signature located on L40+00N is known to be associated with the uranium mineralization associated with the Phoenix Deposits. Although this analysis of the survey data is primarily based on empirical observations on profile data collected from the characteristics of the TDEM data, further analysis was required and all data was imported into EM modelling software (Maxwell EMIT and/or EMIGMA) to better define the characteristics of the conductive body and the surrounding half-space. Some conductors were identified.

The 2011 exploration program on the Wheeler River Property carried out by Denison included a 120.6 line-km Titan24 DC/IP Survey. Additional Titan 24 surveying (48.2 line-km) was completed in 2012.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 9-2

| www.rpacan.com

10 DRILLING

Diamond drilling on the Wheeler River Property is the principal method of exploration and delineation of uranium mineralization after initial geophysical surveys. Drilling can generally be conducted year round on the Phoenix Deposits. Drill holes on Phoenix are labelled with a prefix of the project (WR) followed by the hole number, with almost all drill holes being drilled vertically or oriented steeply towards the northwest.

DRILLING METHODOLOGY

Delineation diamond drilling at Phoenix was primarily done with NQ sized core (47.6 mm diameter) in holes WR-249 through WR-275 and HQ sized core (63.5 mm diameter) reducing down to NQ at 350 m in holes WR-276 through WR-486, with most holes successfully penetrating into the basement. In general, drilling in the higher grade areas of A and B Deposits has been conducted on a nominal drill hole grid spacing of 25 m NE-SW by 10 m NW-SE. However, some additional infill holes were drilled primarily to test the spatial continuity of the mineralization. The most notable results from drilling to date are the intersections of 6.0 m (5.9 m true thickness) of 62.6% U 3 O 8 in hole WR-273 and 1.5 m of 81.3% U 3 O 8 in hole WR-305. The bulk of the flat lying high-grade mineralization is positioned at and sub parallel to the unconformity.

EXPLORATION DRILLING 2005-2012

In 2005, 12 holes, (4,829 m) were drilled in the vicinity of the quartzite ridge. The last hole of 2005, WR-204, intersected strong thrust faulting with sandstone wedges and intersected 1.48% U 3 O 8 over 0.5 m at a depth of 313 m along the northwest side of the quartzite ridge. This was the first indication of uranium mineralization associated with the quartzite ridge on the Wheeler River Property.

In 2006, Denison drilled a total of 28 holes (10,516 m), all targeting the quartzite ridge, along a seven kilometre length. Most holes were located on the northwest (footwall) side of the ridge. The most significant results were from WR-214, drilled in the WR-204 area, where probing returned 0.85% eU 3 O 8 over 3.8 m from 310 m. This was the highest value yet obtained on the Wheeler River Property, and was associated with the footwall thrust contact, but in an area with no graphite.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 10-1

| www.rpacan.com

In 2007, 18 holes (6,147 m) were drilled. Primary targets during the winter program were transient EM (TEM) anomalies as follow up to the airborne GEOTEM survey, and further testing of the hanging wall of the quartzite ridge. Reinterpretation of the 2003 resistivity survey identified three areas on the 2D sections that were deemed worthy of follow up testing. Three holes (WR-236, 237 and 238) were drilled to follow up the strongly altered and geochemically anomalous Cameco hole WR-192 and to test two weakly developed sandstone resistivity anomalies. All three holes intersected significant structure and alteration, but no mineralization or graphitic pelite in the basement.

Work during the summer of 2007 continued to test the quartzite ridge in the WR-204 area and also further south. Almost all holes in the vicinity of the quartzite ridge returned strong clay alteration and structure. WR-242A, located some 600 m along strike to the northeast of WR-214 returned 0.26% U 3 O 8 over 1.8 m and strengthened the belief that the footwall should remain a major focus of exploration although the JV partners noted that the hanging wall of the quartzite unit should not be neglected.

The first hole during the summer of 2008 was WR-249 on geophysics line 4300 to test resistivity target “A”. WR-249 was spotted 90 m northwest of WR-190A, which had been lost in the sandstone 34 m above the unconformity in 2003. The hole encountered strong desilicification, silicification, hydrothermal hematite, druzy quartz and increased fracture density, with progressively more intense alteration towards the unconformity, together with a strong grey bleached zone consisting of extremely fine grained pyrite which provided a strong visual contrast to bleached zones in other nearby holes. At the unconformity, disseminated and massive uranium mineralization was present from 406.65 m to 409 m. The assay grade was 1.06% U 3 O 8 over 2.35 m. This was the highest intercept on the Wheeler River Property to date. This hole was located seven kilometres northeast of the previous work in the WR-204 area and, more significantly, was drilled on the hanging wall rather than the footwall side of the quartzite ridge.

Target “B” was tested by WR-251 which was located 600 m along strike from WR-249. It intersected similar alteration along with three mineralized zones occurring both at the unconformity and in the basement. The best intersection graded 0.78% U 3 O 8 over 2.25 m.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 10-2

| www.rpacan.com

All 2008 follow up drilling was located in the WR-251 area. More uranium mineralization (1.4% U 3 O 8 over 4.0 m and 1.75% U 3 O 8 over 0.5 m) was intersected in WR-253, which was drilled to test for mineralization 15 m to the southeast of WR-251.

All drill holes during the summer of 2008 intersected either uranium mineralization or very strong alteration close to mineralization on the hanging wall of the quartzite unit. This new discovery was named Phoenix. Located over eight kilometres northeast of areas in the Wheeler River Property that had been tested by previous work, the Phoenix Deposits have many geological similarities to the McArthur River mineralization, but are at a shallower depth. The Wheeler River Property is favourably located along strike from the McArthur River deposit and is underlain by many of the same geological features that are present on that producing property.

During 2009, three drill programs consisting of a total of 43 diamond drill holes (19,006 m), were carried out, each of which established significant milestones in the advancement of the project. During the winter program, the first indications of higher grade mineralization came from Hole WR-258, which returned 11.8% U 3 O 8 over 5.5 m from a depth of 397 m. The summer drill program continued to test the discovery, with hole WR-273 returning a value of 62.6% U 3 O 8 over 6.0 m at a depth of 405 m. Mineralization was monomineralic pitchblende with very low concentrations of accessory minerals and was reported to be remarkably similar to the high-grade McArthur River P2 deposits. Most of the mineralization occurs as a horizontal sheet at the base of the Athabasca sandstone proximal to where a graphitic pelite unit in the basement intersects the unconformity. In addition, the alteration changes to the northeast with intense and strong basement bleaching becoming more prominent, and the strongest graphitic faulting yet observed. More significantly, the new mineralized zone returned the highest grades so far intersected in more than 40 years of continuous exploration on the Wheeler River project. A further drill program in the fall of 2009 established continuity of the high-grade portion of the mineralized zone and extended the overall zone as a possibly continuous unit for a strike length of greater than one kilometre.

During 2010, 62 diamond drill holes totalling 28,362.3 m were carried out on two claims along the Phoenix Deposit trend. Of the 62 drill holes, 59 totalling 27,853.25 m were completed to the desired depth and three were lost or abandoned due to poor ground conditions or excessive deviation. The three lost holes were redrilled and successfully completed to the desired depth. Twenty-seven holes were drilled on claim S-98341 during two drill seasons from January to April and June to August. Thirty-five holes were drilled on claim S-97909 during two drill seasons from January to April and June to August. The two-phase drilling program was carried out during the periods of January to April 2010 and June to August 2010.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 10-3

| www.rpacan.com

During 2011, a two-phase drilling program of 80 diamond drill holes totalling 38,426.6 m was carried out on mineral dispositions S-97908, S-97909, and S-98341. Of the 80 drill holes completed, 77 were successfully completed to design depth.

In 2012, Denison completed a total of 51 diamond drill holes totalling 23,073 m on the Phoenix A Deposit and B Deposit target areas during two drilling campaigns.

Since 1978 a total of 496 diamond drill holes and 61 reverse circulation (RC) drill holes totalling 204,822 m have been completed within the Wheeler River Property of which 229 drill holes totalling 107,905 m of diamond drilling have delineated the Phoenix Deposits (Table 10-1). Well-established drilling industry practices were used in the drilling programs.

TABLE 10-1 DRILLING STATISTICS

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits

Drilling Program |  | Number of Holes |  |  | Meters Drilled |
Winter 2008 |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 3,619 |
Summer 2008 |  |  | 6 |  |  |  | 2,881 |
Winter 2009 |  |  | 17 |  |  |  | 7,900 |
Summer 2009 |  |  | 14 |  |  |  | 6,646 |
Winter 2010 |  |  | 16 |  |  |  | 7,597 |
Summer 2010 |  |  | 39 |  |  |  | 18,343 |
2011 |  |  | 78 |  |  |  | 37,849 |
2012 |  |  | 51 |  |  |  | 23,073 |
Total |  |  | 229 |  |  |  | 107,906 |
A Deposit |  |  | 113 |  |  |  | 52,596 |
B Deposit |  |  | 55 |  |  |  | 25,344 |
C Target |  |  | 24 |  |  |  | 10,438 |
D Target |  |  | 22 |  |  |  | 11,668 |
RECON |  |  | 15 |  |  |  | 7,860 |

To date, the Phoenix deposit area has been systematically drill tested over roughly one kilometre of strike length at a nominal 25 m to 50 m section spacing (Figure 10-1).

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 10-4

| www.rpacan.com

All holes were logged for lithology, structure, alteration, mineralization and geotechnical characteristics. Data were entered into DHLogger software on laptops in the field. The DHLogger data were transferred into a Fusion database. All drill hole data were validated throughout the drilling program and as an integral component of the current recent resource estimation work. Hard copies of drill logs are stored at site.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 10-5

| www.rpacan.com

10 -

6 |

B2 DEPOSIT

www 050 100 150 200 rpacan Metres December 2012

UTM Projection WGS 84-13N

Source: Denison Mines Corp., 2012.

com

10-6

| www.rpacan.com

DRILL HOLE SURVEYING

The collar locations of drill holes are spotted on a grid established in the field and collar sites are surveyed by differential base station GPS using the NAD83 UTM zone 13N reference datum. To date and in general, drilling of A Deposit and B Deposit has been conducted on a nominal drill hole grid spacing of 25 m northeast-southwest by 10 m northwest-southeast.

The trajectory of all drill holes is determined with a Reflex instrument in single point mode, which measures the dip and azimuth at 50 m intervals down the hole with an initial test taken six metres below the casing and a final measurement at the bottom of the hole. All mineralized and non-mineralized holes within the deposit are cemented from approximately 25 m below the mineralized zone to approximately 25 m above the zone.

RADIOMETRIC LOGGING OF DRILL HOLES

All drill holes on the Wheeler River Property are logged with a radiometric probe to measure the natural gamma radiation, from which an indirect estimate of uranium content can be made. Most of the data (80%) used for the Phoenix Mineral Resource estimate are obtained from chemical assays of the rock. The remainder of the data are derived from radiometric probe results – generally when poor drill core recovery prevents representative sampling for chemical assays.

RADIOMETRIC PROBING

Probing with a Mount Sopris gamma logging unit employing a triple gamma probe (2GHF-1000) was completed systematically on every drill hole. The 2GHF-1000 modified triple gamma probe measures natural gamma radiation using three different detectors: one 0.5 in by 1.5 in sodium iodide (NaI) crystal assembly and two Geiger Mueller (G-M) tubes installed above the NaI detector. These G-M tubes have been used successfully to determine grade in very high concentrations of U 3 O 8. By utilizing three different detector sensitivities (the sensitivity of the detectors is very different from one detector to another), these probes can be used in both exploration and development projects across a wide spectrum of uranium grade. Accurate concentrations can be measured in uranium grades ranging from less than 0.1% to as high as 80% U 3 O 8. Data are logged from all three detectors at a speed of 15 m/min down hole and 5 m/min up hole through the drill rods.

The radiometric or gamma probe measures gamma radiation which is emitted during the natural radioactive decay of uranium (U) and variations in the natural radioactivity originating from changes in concentrations of the trace element thorium (Th) as well as changes in concentration of the major rock forming element potassium (K).

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 10-7

| www.rpacan.com

Potassium decays into two stable isotopes (argon and calcium) which are no longer radioactive, and emits gamma rays with energies of 1.46 MeV. Uranium and thorium, however, decay into daughter- products which are unstable (i.e. radioactive). The decay of uranium forms a series of about a dozen radioactive elements in nature which finally decay to a stable isotope of lead. The decay of thorium forms a similar series of radioelements. As each radioelement in the series decays, it is accompanied by emissions of alpha or beta particles or gamma rays. The gamma rays have specific energies associated with the decaying radionuclide. The most prominent of the gamma rays in the uranium series originate from decay of 214 Bi (bismuth), and in the thorium series from decay of 208 TI (thallium).

The natural gamma measurement is made when a detector emits a pulse of light when struck by a gamma ray. This pulse of light is amplified by a photomultiplier tube, which outputs a current pulse which is known as “counts per second” or “cps”. The gamma probe is lowered to the bottom of a drill hole and data are recorded as the tool travels to the bottom and then is pulled back up to the surface. The current pulse is carried up a conductive cable and processed by a logging system computer which stores the raw gamma cps data.

Since the concentrations of these naturally occurring radioelements vary between different rock types, natural gamma ray logging provides an important tool for lithologic mapping and stratigraphic correlation. For example, in sedimentary rocks, sandstones can be easily distinguished from shales due to the low potassium content of the sandstones compared to the shales. The greatest value of the gamma ray log in uranium exploration, however, is in determining equivalent uranium grade.

The basis of the indirect uranium grade calculation (referred to as “eU 3 O 8” for “equivalent U 3 O 8”) is the sensitivity of the detector used in the probe which is the ratio of cps to known uranium grade and is referred to as the probe calibration factor. Each detector’s sensitivity is measured when it is first manufactured and is also periodically checked throughout the operating life of each probe against a known set of standard “test pits,” with various known grades of uranium mineralization or through empirical calculations. Application of the calibration factor, along with other probe correction factors, allows for immediate grade estimation in the field as each drill hole is logged.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 10-8

| www.rpacan.com

Down hole total gamma data are subjected to a complex set of mathematical equations, taking into account the specific parameters of the probe used, speed of logging, size of bore hole, drilling fluids and presence or absence of any type of drill hole casing. The result is an indirect measurement of uranium content within the sphere of measurement of the gamma detector. A Denison in-house computer program known as GAMLOG converts the measured counts per second of the gamma rays into 10 cm increments of equivalent percent U 3 O 8 (%eU 3 O 8 ). GAMLOG is based on the Scott’s Algorithm developed by James Scott of the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) in 1962 and is widely used in the industry.

The conversion coefficients for conversion of probe counts per second to %eU 3 O 8 equivalent uranium grades are based on the calibration results obtained at the Saskatchewan Research Council (SRC) uranium calibration pits (sodium iodide crystal) and empirical values developed in-house (Sweet and Petrie 2010) for the triple-gamma probe (Figure 10-2).

The Saskatchewan Research Council (SRC) down-hole probe calibration facilities are located in Saskatoon, SK. The calibration facilities test pits consist of four variably-mineralized holes, each approximately four meters thickness. The gamma probes are tested a minimum of four times per year, usually before and after both the winter and summer field seasons.

Drilling procedures, including collar surveying, down hole Reflex surveying and radiometric probing are standard industry practice.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 10-9

| www.rpacan.com

10-10

| www.rpacan.com

SAMPLING METHOD AND APPROACH

DRILL CORE HANDLING AND LOGGING PROCEDURES

At each drill site, core is removed from the core tube by the drill contractors and placed directly into three row NQ wooden core boxes with standard 1.5 m length (4.5 m total) or two row HQ wooden boxes with standard 1.5 m (3 m total). Individual drill runs are identified with small wooden blocks, onto which the depth in metres is recorded. Diamond drill core is transported at the end of each drill shift to an enclosed core-handling facility at Denison’s Wheeler River camp. The core handling procedures at the drill site are industry standard. Drill holes are logged at the Wheeler River camp core logging facilities by Denison personnel.

Before samples are taken for assay, the core is photographed, descriptively logged, measured for structures, surveyed with a scintillometer, and marked for sampling. Sampling of the holes for assay is guided by the observed geology, radiometric logs and readings from a hand-held scintillometer.

The general concept behind the scintillometer is similar to the gamma probe except the radiometric pulses are displayed on a scale on the instrument and the respective count rates are recorded manually by the technician logging the core or chips. The hand-held scintillometer provides quantitative data only and cannot be used to calculate uranium grades; however, it does allow the geologist to identify uranium mineralization in the core and to select intervals for geochemical sampling, as described below.

Scintillometer readings are taken throughout the hole as part of the logging process, usually at three metre intervals and are an average of the interval. In mineralized zones, where scintillometer readings are above five times background (roughly 500 cps depending on the scintillometer being used), readings are recorded over 10 cm intervals and tied to the run interval blocks. The scintillometer profile is then plotted on strip logs to compare and adjust the depth of the down-hole gamma logs. Core trays are marked with aluminum tags as well as felt marker.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 10-11

| www.rpacan.com

DRILL CORE SAMPLING

Denison obtains assays for all the cored sections through mineralized intervals. All mineralized core is measured with a hand-held spectrometer, Radiation Solutions RS-120 Spectrometer, by removing each piece of drill core from the ambient background, noting the most pertinent reproducible result in counts per second (cps), and carefully returning it to its correct place in the core box. Any core registering over 500 cps is flagged for splitting and sent to the lab for assay. Early drill holes were sampled using variable intervals (0.2 m to 1.0 m), but after drill hole WR-253, were sampled using 0.5 m lengths. Barren samples are taken to flank both ends of mineralized intersections, with flank sample lengths at least 0.5 m on either end, but may be significantly more in areas with strong mineralization.

All core samples are split with a hand splitter according to 0.5 m sample intervals marked on the core. One-half of the core is returned to the core box for future reference and the other half is bagged, tagged, and sealed in a plastic bag. Bags of samples for geochemical or clay analyses are placed in large plastic pails and sealed for shipping. Bags of mineralized samples are sealed for shipping in metal or plastic pails depending on the radioactivity level.

Several types of samples are collected routinely from drill core at Phoenix. These include:

| • | Systematic composite geochemical samples of both Athabasca sandstone and metamorphic basement rocks to characterize clay alteration and geochemical zoning associated with mineralization;

| • | Selective grab samples and split-core intervals for geochemical quantification of geologically-interesting material and mineralized material;

| • | Samples collected for determination of dry bulk density; and

| • | Non-geochemical samples for determination of mineralogy to assess alteration patterns, lithology types, and mineralization characteristics.

Selective samples form a quantitative assessment of mineralization grade and associated elemental abundances, while the systematic and mineralogical samples are collected mainly for exploration purposes to determine patterns applicable to mineral exploration. These sampling types and approaches are typical for uranium exploration and definition drilling programs in the Athabasca Basin.

Denison collects a suite of samples from each drill hole for determining the content and distribution of trace elements, uranium, and clay minerals (alteration). For ICP-MS analysis (Section 13) from the collar to approximately 350 m, sandstone samples are collected at ten metre intervals, from 350 m to the unconformity, sandstone samples are collected on five meter intervals. In the basement, Denison samples on five meter intervals throughout. For ICP-OES analysis (Section 13), Denison samples on 0.5 m spacing through the mineralized zone. For the determination of clay alteration species in the sandstone column, Denison collects samples for analysis by a PIMA analyzer. Throughout the sandstone section, a two to three centimetre chip sample of core is collected every ten metres up to 350 m, then every five metres to the end of hole. Near the unconformity, the sample interval is shortened as needed. PIMA samples are also collected as needed throughout the altered basement rocks.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 10-12

| www.rpacan.com

The drill core handling and sampling protocols are standard in the industry.

CORE AND USE OF PROBE DATA

Grade determinations in mineralized rock rely primarily on chemical assays of drill core. Given the high rate of core recovery within the mineralized zone, chemical assays are reliable. Locally, core can be broken and blocky, but recovery is generally good with an average overall 89.65% recovery.

The mineralized zones (sandstones or basement), are moderately to strongly altered, and occasionally disrupted by fault breccias. Local intervals of up to five metres with less than 80% recovery have been encountered due to washouts during the drilling process. Where 80% or less of a composited interval is recovered during drilling (>20% core loss), or where no geochemical sampling has occurred across a mineralized interval, uranium grade determination has been supplemented by radiometric probing. Radiometric probe data accounts for approximately 20% of the drill holes used for the Mineral Resource estimate at Phoenix.

There are 1,589 U 3 O 8 assay records totalling 788 m in the Phoenix A and B Deposits, Wheeler River project database. Of these, 1,345 U 3 O 8 assay records totalling 666 m are in A Deposit and 244 U 3 O 8 assay records totalling 122.0 m are in B Deposit.

Table 10-2 lists A Deposit and B Deposit drill hole intersections in terms of thickness, average grade, grade times thickness (GT), density, grade times density (GxD) and grade times thickness times density (GxTxD). Table 10-3 shows the same information for A and B Deposits drill hole intersections with grades greater than 1% U 3 O 8.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 10-13

| www.rpacan.com

TABLE 10-2 A DEPOSIT AND B DEPOSIT DRILL HOLE INTERSECTIONS

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits

Hole No. |  | From |  | To |  | Thick (m) |  | Grade (% U3 O 8) |  | GT |  | Cut-off (%) |  | Density |  | GxD |  | GxTxD
WR-249 |  | 406.40 |  | 409.00 |  | 2.60 |  | 0.999 |  | 2.598 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 2.288 |  | 5.948
WR-251 |  | 386.00 |  | 389.25 |  | 3.25 |  | 0.589 |  | 1.915 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 1.349 |  | 4.385
WR-251 |  | 393.20 |  | 394.20 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.061 |  | 0.061 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.140 |  | 0.140
WR-252 |  | 463.00 |  | 463.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-253 |  | 378.50 |  | 381.50 |  | 3.00 |  | 0.185 |  | 0.554 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.423 |  | 1.269
WR-253 |  | 383.50 |  | 384.50 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.162 |  | 0.162 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.370 |  | 0.370
WR-253 |  | 389.00 |  | 393.20 |  | 4.20 |  | 1.334 |  | 5.604 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 3.054 |  | 12.827
WR-253 |  | 395.20 |  | 397.20 |  | 2.00 |  | 0.478 |  | 0.956 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 1.095 |  | 2.189
WR-254 |  | 470.00 |  | 470.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-255 |  | 393.50 |  | 393.60 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-256 |  | 438.00 |  | 438.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-257 |  | 477.00 |  | 477.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-258 |  | 397.00 |  | 402.50 |  | 5.50 |  | 11.822 |  | 65.021 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.358 |  | 27.876 |  | 153.320
WR-259 |  | 397.00 |  | 403.00 |  | 6.00 |  | 13.381 |  | 80.285 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.381 |  | 31.860 |  | 191.158
WR-260 |  | 395.70 |  | 397.20 |  | 1.50 |  | 0.251 |  | 0.377 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.576 |  | 0.863
WR-260 |  | 399.70 |  | 400.70 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.065 |  | 0.065 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.150 |  | 0.150
WR-261 |  | 405.00 |  | 406.00 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.050 |  | 0.050 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.115 |  | 0.115
WR-261 |  | 407.50 |  | 415.00 |  | 7.50 |  | 1.733 |  | 13.000 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.288 |  | 3.966 |  | 29.744
WR-262 |  | 497.00 |  | 497.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-263 |  | 504.00 |  | 504.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-264A |  | 399.40 |  | 402.10 |  | 2.70 |  | 0.481 |  | 1.300 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 1.103 |  | 2.977
WR-265 |  | 483.70 |  | 483.80 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-266 |  | 413.50 |  | 417.00 |  | 3.50 |  | 1.152 |  | 4.033 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 2.637 |  | 9.231
WR-267 |  | 405.00 |  | 408.50 |  | 3.50 |  | 19.963 |  | 69.872 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.518 |  | 50.268 |  | 175.936
WR-267 |  | 410.00 |  | 411.50 |  | 1.50 |  | 0.124 |  | 0.186 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.284 |  | 0.426
WR-268 |  | 409.50 |  | 414.00 |  | 4.50 |  | 9.259 |  | 41.666 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.327 |  | 21.546 |  | 96.957
WR-268 |  | 417.50 |  | 418.50 |  | 1.00 |  | 1.551 |  | 1.551 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.288 |  | 3.549 |  | 3.549
WR-269 |  | 408.25 |  | 409.75 |  | 1.50 |  | 9.094 |  | 13.640 |  | 1.00 |  | 2.325 |  | 21.142 |  | 31.714
WR-269 |  | 416.55 |  | 417.55 |  | 1.00 |  | 1.487 |  | 1.487 |  | 1.00 |  | 2.288 |  | 3.402 |  | 3.402
WR-270 |  | 376.00 |  | 377.00 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.965 |  | 0.965 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 2.208 |  | 2.208
WR-271 |  | 417.00 |  | 417.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-272 |  | 411.00 |  | 416.50 |  | 5.50 |  | 3.387 |  | 18.631 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 7.757 |  | 42.664
WR-273 |  | 405.00 |  | 411.00 |  | 6.00 |  | 62.605 |  | 375.630 |  | 0.05 |  | 4.872 |  | 305.012 |  | 1830.069
WR-273 |  | 413.00 |  | 414.00 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.058 |  | 0.058 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.132 |  | 0.132
WR-274 |  | 409.70 |  | 420.50 |  | 10.80 |  | 3.516 |  | 37.973 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 8.052 |  | 86.958
WR-274 |  | 423.50 |  | 426.40 |  | 2.90 |  | 0.260 |  | 0.755 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.596 |  | 1.729
WR-274 |  | 429.00 |  | 430.50 |  | 1.50 |  | 2.843 |  | 4.264 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 6.507 |  | 9.760
WR-274 |  | 433.00 |  | 435.50 |  | 2.50 |  | 0.061 |  | 0.153 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.140 |  | 0.350
WR-275 |  | 410.00 |  | 410.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-276 |  | 411.00 |  | 415.00 |  | 4.00 |  | 0.899 |  | 3.596 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 2.058 |  | 8.231
WR-276 |  | 418.50 |  | 420.50 |  | 2.00 |  | 0.368 |  | 0.736 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.842 |  | 1.684
WR-276 |  | 422.00 |  | 424.00 |  | 2.00 |  | 1.572 |  | 3.145 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.288 |  | 3.598 |  | 7.195
WR-277 |  | 462.00 |  | 462.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-278 |  | 503.00 |  | 503.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-279 |  | 494.00 |  | 495.00 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.072 |  | 0.072 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.164 |  | 0.164
WR-279 |  | 497.00 |  | 498.00 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.069 |  | 0.069 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.158 |  | 0.158
WR-279 |  | 520.00 |  | 521.00 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.141 |  | 0.141 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.322 |  | 0.322
WR-279 |  | 540.00 |  | 541.00 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.059 |  | 0.059 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.135 |  | 0.135
WR-280 |  | 444.00 |  | 444.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-281 |  | 404.50 |  | 408.50 |  | 4.00 |  | 1.072 |  | 4.288 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 2.454 |  | 9.815
WR-281 |  | 410.00 |  | 411.00 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.052 |  | 0.052 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.119 |  | 0.119
WR-281 |  | 414.20 |  | 415.20 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.055 |  | 0.055 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.126 |  | 0.126
WR-281 |  | 417.20 |  | 418.20 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.346 |  | 0.346 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.792 |  | 0.792
WR-282 |  | 486.00 |  | 486.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-283 |  | 396.95 |  | 403.35 |  | 6.40 |  | 0.201 |  | 1.284 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.459 |  | 2.940
WR-283 |  | 413.75 |  | 414.75 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.055 |  | 0.055 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.125 |  | 0.125
WR-283 |  | 420.55 |  | 421.55 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.092 |  | 0.092 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.211 |  | 0.211
WR-285 |  | 386.00 |  | 388.00 |  | 2.00 |  | 0.236 |  | 0.472 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.540 |  | 1.080
WR-286 |  | 398.50 |  | 409.00 |  | 10.50 |  | 14.405 |  | 151.252 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.399 |  | 34.558 |  | 362.855
WR-286 |  | 410.50 |  | 412.00 |  | 1.50 |  | 0.284 |  | 0.426 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.650 |  | 0.976
WR-286 |  | 413.00 |  | 414.00 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.056 |  | 0.056 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.127 |  | 0.127
WR-287 |  | 402.95 |  | 410.45 |  | 7.50 |  | 32.301 |  | 242.255 |  | 1.00 |  | 2.937 |  | 94.867 |  | 711.503
WR-288 |  | 399.15 |  | 402.25 |  | 3.10 |  | 0.157 |  | 0.488 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.361 |  | 1.118
WR-289A |  | 499.70 |  | 499.80 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-290 |  | 399.00 |  | 409.00 |  | 10.00 |  | 4.203 |  | 42.027 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.292 |  | 9.633 |  | 96.326
WR-290 |  | 415.00 |  | 416.50 |  | 1.50 |  | 1.944 |  | 2.916 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.288 |  | 4.447 |  | 6.671

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 10-14

| www.rpacan.com

Hole No. |  | From |  | To |  | Thick (m) |  | Grade (% U3 O 8) |  | GT |  | Cut-off (%) |  | Density |  | GxD |  | GxTxD
WR-291A |  | 392.50 |  | 395.50 |  | 3.00 |  | 10.347 |  | 31.040 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.339 |  | 24.201 |  | 72.602
WR-292 |  | 398.00 |  | 405.50 |  | 7.50 |  | 4.949 |  | 37.116 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.295 |  | 11.357 |  | 85.181
WR-293 |  | 417.50 |  | 419.00 |  | 1.50 |  | 0.511 |  | 0.766 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 1.170 |  | 1.754
WR-294 |  | 398.05 |  | 399.75 |  | 1.70 |  | 10.459 |  | 17.780 |  | 1.00 |  | 2.34 |  | 24.474 |  | 41.606
WR-295 |  | 391.25 |  | 394.95 |  | 3.70 |  | 1.106 |  | 4.093 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 2.532 |  | 9.370
WR-295 |  | 399.75 |  | 400.75 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.251 |  | 0.251 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.575 |  | 0.575
WR-296 |  | 531.00 |  | 531.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-297 |  | 410.35 |  | 412.05 |  | 1.70 |  | 0.147 |  | 0.250 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.336 |  | 0.572
WR-298A |  | 483.00 |  | 483.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-299 |  | 400.50 |  | 406.00 |  | 5.50 |  | 10.202 |  | 56.111 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.337 |  | 23.842 |  | 131.131
WR-299 |  | 411.50 |  | 414.00 |  | 2.50 |  | 0.316 |  | 0.790 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.724 |  | 1.810
WR-299 |  | 439.00 |  | 441.00 |  | 2.00 |  | 0.067 |  | 0.134 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.154 |  | 0.308
WR-300 |  | 407.50 |  | 423.50 |  | 16.00 |  | 7.288 |  | 116.615 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.309 |  | 16.829 |  | 269.264
WR-301 |  | 405.00 |  | 413.50 |  | 8.50 |  | 1.918 |  | 16.299 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.288 |  | 4.387 |  | 37.292
WR-302 |  | 406.00 |  | 414.50 |  | 8.50 |  | 9.087 |  | 77.244 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.325 |  | 21.128 |  | 179.591
WR-303 |  | 435.00 |  | 435.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-304 |  | 459.00 |  | 459.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-305 |  | 402.00 |  | 408.50 |  | 6.50 |  | 31.674 |  | 205.881 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.911 |  | 92.203 |  | 599.318
WR-305 |  | 410.50 |  | 416.50 |  | 6.00 |  | 1.444 |  | 8.667 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 3.306 |  | 19.838
WR-305 |  | 420.00 |  | 421.00 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.415 |  | 0.415 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.949 |  | 0.949
WR-306 |  | 406.50 |  | 414.00 |  | 7.50 |  | 33.246 |  | 249.344 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.978 |  | 99.006 |  | 742.545
WR-306 |  | 421.50 |  | 422.50 |  | 1.00 |  | 2.320 |  | 2.320 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 5.310 |  | 5.310
WR-307 |  | 462.00 |  | 462.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-308 |  | 404.50 |  | 406.50 |  | 2.00 |  | 2.152 |  | 4.303 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.288 |  | 4.923 |  | 9.845
WR-309A |  | 516.00 |  | 516.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-310 |  | 495.80 |  | 495.90 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-311 |  | 400.50 |  | 401.50 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.066 |  | 0.066 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.152 |  | 0.152
WR-311 |  | 402.50 |  | 409.00 |  | 6.50 |  | 6.879 |  | 44.712 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.306 |  | 15.862 |  | 103.106
WR-312 |  | 537.00 |  | 537.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-313 |  | 432.00 |  | 432.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-314 |  | #N/A |  | #N/A |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-315 |  | 452.70 |  | 452.80 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-316 |  | 570.90 |  | 571.00 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-317 |  | #N/A |  | #N/A |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-318 |  | 400.40 |  | 413.40 |  | 13.00 |  | 6.249 |  | 81.232 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.302 |  | 14.384 |  | 186.997
WR-318 |  | 415.40 |  | 421.40 |  | 6.00 |  | 0.426 |  | 2.554 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.975 |  | 5.850
WR-318 |  | 432.00 |  | 433.50 |  | 1.50 |  | 0.210 |  | 0.316 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.482 |  | 0.722
WR-318 |  | 435.50 |  | 437.50 |  | 2.00 |  | 0.148 |  | 0.296 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.339 |  | 0.678
WR-319 |  | #N/A |  | #N/A |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-320 |  | 546.40 |  | 546.50 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-321 |  | 471.00 |  | 471.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-322 |  | #N/A |  | #N/A |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-323 |  | 516.00 |  | 516.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-324 |  | 485.60 |  | 485.70 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-325 |  | 529.05 |  | 531.55 |  | 2.50 |  | 0.094 |  | 0.235 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.215 |  | 0.539
WR-326 |  | 423.00 |  | 423.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-327 |  | 401.50 |  | 409.00 |  | 7.50 |  | 1.962 |  | 14.712 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.288 |  | 4.488 |  | 33.662
WR-328 |  | 371.50 |  | 373.00 |  | 1.50 |  | 3.352 |  | 5.029 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 7.677 |  | 11.515
WR-328 |  | 374.50 |  | 375.50 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.514 |  | 0.514 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 1.177 |  | 1.177
WR-328 |  | 377.50 |  | 379.00 |  | 1.50 |  | 0.311 |  | 0.467 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.713 |  | 1.069
WR-328 |  | 380.00 |  | 381.00 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.068 |  | 0.068 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.155 |  | 0.155
WR-329 |  | 397.05 |  | 400.25 |  | 3.20 |  | 0.230 |  | 0.737 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.528 |  | 1.688
WR-329 |  | 409.35 |  | 411.15 |  | 1.80 |  | 0.220 |  | 0.396 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.504 |  | 0.908
WR-330 |  | 402.50 |  | 406.50 |  | 4.00 |  | 1.092 |  | 4.370 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 2.501 |  | 10.002
WR-331 |  | 463.70 |  | 463.80 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-332 |  | 415.35 |  | 416.35 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.070 |  | 0.070 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.160 |  | 0.160
WR-333 |  | 397.40 |  | 403.40 |  | 6.00 |  | 14.565 |  | 87.390 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.401 |  | 34.970 |  | 209.822
WR-334 |  | 407.00 |  | 412.50 |  | 5.50 |  | 6.561 |  | 36.085 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.304 |  | 15.116 |  | 83.141
WR-334 |  | 414.00 |  | 417.00 |  | 3.00 |  | 0.540 |  | 1.621 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 1.237 |  | 3.712
WR-334 |  | 419.50 |  | 422.50 |  | 3.00 |  | 0.705 |  | 2.114 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 1.613 |  | 4.838
WR-335 |  | 402.00 |  | 404.50 |  | 2.50 |  | 4.914 |  | 12.285 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.295 |  | 11.277 |  | 28.193
WR-335 |  | 406.00 |  | 407.50 |  | 1.50 |  | 0.769 |  | 1.154 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 1.760 |  | 2.640
WR-335 |  | 409.50 |  | 410.50 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.325 |  | 0.325 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.743 |  | 0.743
WR-336 |  | 335.25 |  | 336.25 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.054 |  | 0.054 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.124 |  | 0.124
WR-337 |  | 411.65 |  | 413.85 |  | 2.20 |  | 0.129 |  | 0.284 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.296 |  | 0.650
WR-338 |  | 489.00 |  | 489.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-339 |  | 456.00 |  | 456.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-340 |  | 435.00 |  | 435.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-341A |  | 401.00 |  | 402.00 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.351 |  | 0.351 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.803 |  | 0.803
WR-342 |  | 406.00 |  | 416.00 |  | 10.00 |  | 12.409 |  | 124.085 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.366 |  | 29.359 |  | 293.586

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 10-15

| www.rpacan.com

Hole No. |  | From |  | To |  | Thick (m) |  | Grade (% U3 O 8) |  | GT |  | Cut-off (%) |  | Density |  | GxD |  | GxTxD
WR-343 |  | 407.00 |  | 408.00 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.050 |  | 0.050 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.115 |  | 0.115
WR-343 |  | 409.50 |  | 415.50 |  | 6.00 |  | 7.449 |  | 44.696 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.31 |  | 17.208 |  | 103.247
WR-344 |  | 400.00 |  | 404.50 |  | 4.50 |  | 1.365 |  | 6.142 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 3.124 |  | 14.059
WR-345 |  | 402.00 |  | 407.00 |  | 5.00 |  | 16.219 |  | 81.094 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.433 |  | 39.460 |  | 197.302
WR-345 |  | 409.50 |  | 411.00 |  | 1.50 |  | 2.513 |  | 3.770 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 5.753 |  | 8.630
WR-345 |  | 429.00 |  | 430.00 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.108 |  | 0.108 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.248 |  | 0.248
WR-345 |  | 435.00 |  | 436.00 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.069 |  | 0.069 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.157 |  | 0.157
WR-346 |  | 403.80 |  | 405.80 |  | 2.00 |  | 0.380 |  | 0.761 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.871 |  | 1.742
WR-346 |  | 408.30 |  | 409.30 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.942 |  | 0.942 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 2.155 |  | 2.155
WR-347 |  | 398.60 |  | 405.10 |  | 6.50 |  | 5.445 |  | 35.390 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.297 |  | 12.506 |  | 81.291
WR-348 |  | 389.00 |  | 396.00 |  | 7.00 |  | 4.874 |  | 34.117 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.295 |  | 11.186 |  | 78.299
WR-349 |  | 402.30 |  | 403.30 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.392 |  | 0.392 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.898 |  | 0.898
WR-350 |  | 432.00 |  | 432.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-351 |  | 387.00 |  | 389.50 |  | 2.50 |  | 6.147 |  | 15.367 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.301 |  | 14.144 |  | 35.360
WR-352 |  | 425.30 |  | 425.40 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-353 |  | 382.10 |  | 383.10 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.066 |  | 0.066 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.150 |  | 0.150
WR-353 |  | 385.00 |  | 386.50 |  | 1.50 |  | 1.104 |  | 1.656 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 2.526 |  | 3.789
WR-354 |  | 410.00 |  | 411.50 |  | 1.50 |  | 0.124 |  | 0.187 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.285 |  | 0.428
WR-355 |  | 483.00 |  | 483.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-356 |  | 633.00 |  | 633.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-363 |  | 552.00 |  | 552.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-366 |  | 396.50 |  | 404.50 |  | 8.00 |  | 0.349 |  | 2.789 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.798 |  | 6.388
WR-366 |  | 405.00 |  | 406.00 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.054 |  | 0.054 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.123 |  | 0.123
WR-366 |  | 409.00 |  | 410.00 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.266 |  | 0.266 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.609 |  | 0.609
WR-366 |  | 413.00 |  | 414.00 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.075 |  | 0.075 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.173 |  | 0.173
WR-369 |  | 398.40 |  | 401.40 |  | 3.00 |  | 0.255 |  | 0.765 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.584 |  | 1.752
WR-369 |  | 404.80 |  | 413.30 |  | 8.50 |  | 0.552 |  | 4.696 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 1.265 |  | 10.753
WR-369 |  | 427.00 |  | 428.00 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.149 |  | 0.149 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.341 |  | 0.341
WR-373 |  | 474.00 |  | 474.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-376 |  | 393.00 |  | 401.50 |  | 8.50 |  | 12.309 |  | 104.625 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.365 |  | 29.110 |  | 247.438
WR-376 |  | 413.50 |  | 414.50 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.085 |  | 0.085 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.194 |  | 0.194
WR-376 |  | 429.50 |  | 430.50 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.110 |  | 0.110 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.251 |  | 0.251
WR-379 |  | 412.45 |  | 413.45 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.061 |  | 0.061 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.141 |  | 0.141
WR-382A |  | 600.00 |  | 600.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-383 |  | 393.00 |  | 395.00 |  | 2.00 |  | 3.006 |  | 6.012 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 6.881 |  | 13.762
WR-383 |  | 399.40 |  | 400.40 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.121 |  | 0.121 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.277 |  | 0.277
WR-383 |  | 410.00 |  | 412.00 |  | 2.00 |  | 1.111 |  | 2.222 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 2.543 |  | 5.085
WR-384 |  | 444.00 |  | 444.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-389 |  | 403.85 |  | 405.05 |  | 1.20 |  | 0.372 |  | 0.447 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.852 |  | 1.022
WR-389 |  | 406.75 |  | 408.15 |  | 1.40 |  | 0.058 |  | 0.081 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.132 |  | 0.185
WR-390 |  | 627.00 |  | 627.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-392 |  | 407.00 |  | 408.00 |  | 1.00 |  | 2.190 |  | 2.190 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.288 |  | 5.011 |  | 5.011
WR-392 |  | 409.50 |  | 410.50 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.115 |  | 0.115 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.263 |  | 0.263
WR-393 |  | 407.00 |  | 408.00 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.052 |  | 0.052 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.119 |  | 0.119
WR-395 |  | 400.00 |  | 404.00 |  | 4.00 |  | 0.926 |  | 3.706 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 2.121 |  | 8.483
WR-396 |  | 396.65 |  | 397.65 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.051 |  | 0.051 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.116 |  | 0.116
WR-396 |  | 451.65 |  | 452.65 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.058 |  | 0.058 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.134 |  | 0.134
WR-397 |  | 480.00 |  | 480.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-399 |  | 402.55 |  | 405.25 |  | 2.70 |  | 2.655 |  | 7.168 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 6.077 |  | 16.408
WR-400 |  | 471.50 |  | 471.60 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-401 |  | 404.55 |  | 412.95 |  | 8.40 |  | 38.484 |  | 323.262 |  | 1.00 |  | 3.227 |  | 124.187 |  | 1043.167
WR-402 |  | 403.85 |  | 405.25 |  | 1.40 |  | 5.502 |  | 7.703 |  | 1.00 |  | 2.298 |  | 12.644 |  | 17.702
WR-403 |  | 394.50 |  | 413.00 |  | 18.50 |  | 14.959 |  | 276.738 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.409 |  | 36.036 |  | 666.661
WR-403 |  | 417.00 |  | 418.50 |  | 1.50 |  | 0.151 |  | 0.227 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.347 |  | 0.520
WR-404 |  | 414.00 |  | 417.50 |  | 3.50 |  | 4.166 |  | 14.582 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.292 |  | 9.549 |  | 33.422
WR-405 |  | 391.50 |  | 396.00 |  | 4.50 |  | 12.216 |  | 54.974 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.364 |  | 28.880 |  | 129.959
WR-405 |  | 399.50 |  | 400.50 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.056 |  | 0.056 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.129 |  | 0.129
WR-405 |  | 405.50 |  | 408.50 |  | 3.00 |  | 1.998 |  | 5.995 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.288 |  | 4.572 |  | 13.716
WR-407 |  | 486.00 |  | 486.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-408 |  | 393.00 |  | 396.00 |  | 3.00 |  | 2.059 |  | 6.178 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.288 |  | 4.712 |  | 14.135
WR-408 |  | 408.50 |  | 410.00 |  | 1.50 |  | 3.710 |  | 5.566 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 8.500 |  | 12.751
WR-409 |  | 402.00 |  | 403.00 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.599 |  | 0.599 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 1.371 |  | 1.371
WR-409 |  | 405.00 |  | 414.00 |  | 9.00 |  | 8.309 |  | 74.784 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.318 |  | 19.261 |  | 173.349
WR-410A |  | 492.00 |  | 492.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-411 |  | 396.00 |  | 399.00 |  | 3.00 |  | 0.345 |  | 1.034 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.789 |  | 2.367
WR-411 |  | 406.00 |  | 407.00 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.764 |  | 0.764 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 1.748 |  | 1.748
WR-411 |  | 414.50 |  | 415.50 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.438 |  | 0.438 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 1.002 |  | 1.002
WR-411 |  | 434.50 |  | 435.50 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.218 |  | 0.218 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.499 |  | 0.499
WR-413 |  | 400.00 |  | 406.50 |  | 6.50 |  | 5.717 |  | 37.162 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.299 |  | 13.144 |  | 85.436
WR-413 |  | 409.50 |  | 410.50 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.087 |  | 0.087 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.199 |  | 0.199

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 10-16

| www.rpacan.com

Hole No. |  | From |  | To |  | Thick (m) |  | Grade (% U3 O 8) |  | GT |  | Cut-off (%) |  | Density |  | GxD |  | GxTxD
WR-414 |  | 423.00 |  | 423.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-415 |  | 394.00 |  | 398.00 |  | 4.00 |  | 0.584 |  | 2.335 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 1.337 |  | 5.347
WR-415 |  | 399.50 |  | 402.50 |  | 3.00 |  | 0.858 |  | 2.573 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 1.963 |  | 5.888
WR-417 |  | 389.50 |  | 406.00 |  | 16.50 |  | 2.051 |  | 33.834 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.288 |  | 4.692 |  | 77.412
WR-417 |  | 410.50 |  | 419.00 |  | 8.50 |  | 0.310 |  | 2.631 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.709 |  | 6.026
WR-418 |  | 528.00 |  | 528.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-419 |  | 392.50 |  | 398.50 |  | 6.00 |  | 14.139 |  | 84.837 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.394 |  | 33.850 |  | 203.099
WR-419 |  | 407.50 |  | 409.50 |  | 2.00 |  | 3.056 |  | 6.112 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 6.995 |  | 13.989
WR-420 |  | 409.85 |  | 412.15 |  | 2.30 |  | 0.197 |  | 0.454 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.452 |  | 1.040
WR-420 |  | 461.65 |  | 463.25 |  | 1.60 |  | 0.059 |  | 0.095 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.136 |  | 0.217
WR-420 |  | 465.25 |  | 466.25 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.057 |  | 0.057 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.130 |  | 0.130
WR-420 |  | 481.15 |  | 483.55 |  | 2.40 |  | 0.114 |  | 0.273 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.260 |  | 0.624
WR-420 |  | 488.35 |  | 492.05 |  | 3.70 |  | 0.118 |  | 0.435 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.269 |  | 0.996
WR-420 |  | 515.45 |  | 516.45 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.116 |  | 0.116 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.266 |  | 0.266
WR-420 |  | 520.95 |  | 522.65 |  | 1.70 |  | 0.300 |  | 0.510 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.687 |  | 1.167
WR-421 |  | 391.50 |  | 396.00 |  | 4.50 |  | 12.586 |  | 56.636 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.369 |  | 29.816 |  | 134.171
WR-422 |  | 393.00 |  | 396.50 |  | 3.50 |  | 0.290 |  | 1.014 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.664 |  | 2.322
WR-422 |  | 409.50 |  | 411.50 |  | 2.00 |  | 0.163 |  | 0.327 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.374 |  | 0.748
WR-422 |  | 433.00 |  | 436.00 |  | 3.00 |  | 0.173 |  | 0.518 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.396 |  | 1.187
WR-423 |  | 474.00 |  | 474.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-424 |  | 747.00 |  | 747.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-425 |  | 402.35 |  | 403.35 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.077 |  | 0.077 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.176 |  | 0.176
WR-425 |  | 416.45 |  | 417.45 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.054 |  | 0.054 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.124 |  | 0.124
WR-425 |  | 420.65 |  | 421.65 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.064 |  | 0.064 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.146 |  | 0.146
WR-425 |  | 472.05 |  | 473.55 |  | 1.50 |  | 0.189 |  | 0.283 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.433 |  | 0.649
WR-426 |  | 459.00 |  | 459.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-427 |  | 414.45 |  | 415.45 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.654 |  | 0.654 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 1.498 |  | 1.498
WR-427 |  | 444.25 |  | 445.55 |  | 1.30 |  | 0.153 |  | 0.199 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.350 |  | 0.455
WR-427 |  | 449.25 |  | 450.25 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.067 |  | 0.067 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.154 |  | 0.154
WR-427 |  | 501.45 |  | 502.45 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.053 |  | 0.053 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.122 |  | 0.122
WR-428 |  | 385.15 |  | 386.95 |  | 1.80 |  | 0.082 |  | 0.148 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.188 |  | 0.339
WR-428 |  | 401.35 |  | 402.35 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.126 |  | 0.126 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.289 |  | 0.289
WR-429 |  | 440.35 |  | 441.35 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.051 |  | 0.051 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.118 |  | 0.118
WR-429 |  | 457.05 |  | 461.15 |  | 4.10 |  | 0.146 |  | 0.600 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.335 |  | 1.374
WR-429 |  | 462.05 |  | 463.05 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.059 |  | 0.059 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.135 |  | 0.135
WR-429 |  | 480.15 |  | 481.15 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.052 |  | 0.052 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.118 |  | 0.118
WR-429 |  | 533.95 |  | 534.95 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.055 |  | 0.055 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.126 |  | 0.126
WR-429 |  | 568.05 |  | 569.05 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.064 |  | 0.064 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.146 |  | 0.146
WR-430 |  | 406.55 |  | 408.05 |  | 1.50 |  | 0.102 |  | 0.154 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.235 |  | 0.352
WR-430 |  | 410.55 |  | 411.75 |  | 1.20 |  | 0.116 |  | 0.139 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.265 |  | 0.318
WR-430 |  | 414.15 |  | 418.95 |  | 4.80 |  | 0.082 |  | 0.392 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.187 |  | 0.899
WR-430 |  | 420.55 |  | 422.25 |  | 1.70 |  | 0.076 |  | 0.129 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.174 |  | 0.296
WR-430 |  | 424.75 |  | 425.75 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.054 |  | 0.054 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.123 |  | 0.123
WR-430 |  | 427.55 |  | 428.55 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.066 |  | 0.066 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.151 |  | 0.151
WR-430 |  | 504.15 |  | 506.55 |  | 2.40 |  | 0.137 |  | 0.329 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.314 |  | 0.752
WR-430 |  | 511.25 |  | 512.25 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.057 |  | 0.057 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.130 |  | 0.130
WR-431 |  | 385.50 |  | 387.50 |  | 2.00 |  | 0.727 |  | 1.454 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 1.664 |  | 3.329
WR-432 |  | 567.00 |  | 567.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-433 |  | 468.00 |  | 468.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-434 |  | 520.00 |  | 520.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-435 |  | 410.05 |  | 414.95 |  | 4.90 |  | 25.772 |  | 126.284 |  | 1.00 |  | 2.689 |  | 69.302 |  | 339.577
WR-436 |  | 570.00 |  | 570.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-437 |  | 408.25 |  | 412.85 |  | 4.60 |  | 21.972 |  | 101.071 |  | 1.00 |  | 2.572 |  | 56.512 |  | 259.954
WR-438 |  | 407.85 |  | 408.85 |  | 1.00 |  | 4.194 |  | 4.194 |  | 1.00 |  | 2.292 |  | 9.613 |  | 9.613
WR-439 |  | 462.00 |  | 462.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-442 |  | 506.00 |  | 506.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-443 |  | 431.20 |  | 431.30 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-444 |  | 400.00 |  | 401.00 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.193 |  | 0.193 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.443 |  | 0.443
WR-445 |  | 489.90 |  | 490.00 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-446 |  | 404.20 |  | 405.70 |  | 1.50 |  | 0.227 |  | 0.340 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.520 |  | 0.779
WR-446 |  | 410.20 |  | 411.70 |  | 1.50 |  | 1.316 |  | 1.974 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 3.012 |  | 4.518
WR-447 |  | 394.60 |  | 400.90 |  | 6.30 |  | 0.679 |  | 4.280 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 1.555 |  | 9.797
WR-447 |  | 407.00 |  | 408.00 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.262 |  | 0.262 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.600 |  | 0.600
WR-447 |  | 416.10 |  | 417.10 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.191 |  | 0.191 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.437 |  | 0.437
WR-448A |  | 429.00 |  | 429.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-449A |  | 407.00 |  | 410.00 |  | 3.00 |  | 0.213 |  | 0.639 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.487 |  | 1.462
WR-450 |  | 412.00 |  | 413.00 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.128 |  | 0.128 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.293 |  | 0.293
WR-451 |  | 408.50 |  | 411.00 |  | 2.50 |  | 0.091 |  | 0.228 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.209 |  | 0.521
WR-452 |  | 452.40 |  | 452.50 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-453 |  | 507.00 |  | 507.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 10-17

| www.rpacan.com

Hole No. |  | From |  | To |  | Thick (m) |  | Grade (% U3 O 8) |  | GT |  | Cut-off (%) |  | Density |  | GxD |  | GxTxD
WR-454 |  | 396.60 |  | 402.10 |  | 5.50 |  | 0.432 |  | 2.376 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.989 |  | 5.440
WR-454 |  | 403.40 |  | 408.40 |  | 5.00 |  | 0.762 |  | 3.812 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 1.745 |  | 8.726
WR-454 |  | 411.80 |  | 415.80 |  | 4.00 |  | 0.233 |  | 0.932 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.534 |  | 2.134
WR-454 |  | 417.30 |  | 418.30 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.072 |  | 0.072 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.165 |  | 0.165
WR-455 |  | 399.75 |  | 400.75 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.117 |  | 0.117 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.269 |  | 0.269
WR-456 |  | 394.85 |  | 395.85 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.067 |  | 0.067 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.154 |  | 0.154
WR-457 |  | 384.00 |  | 387.50 |  | 3.50 |  | 0.685 |  | 2.396 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 1.567 |  | 5.484
WR-458 |  | 411.00 |  | 414.00 |  | 3.00 |  | 1.176 |  | 3.529 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 2.692 |  | 8.077
WR-460 |  | 384.50 |  | 388.00 |  | 3.50 |  | 0.151 |  | 0.530 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.347 |  | 1.213
WR-461 |  | 483.00 |  | 483.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-462 |  | 516.00 |  | 516.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-463 |  | 397.05 |  | 398.05 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.067 |  | 0.067 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.153 |  | 0.153
WR-464 |  | 447.00 |  | 447.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-465 |  | 429.00 |  | 429.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-466 |  | 456.00 |  | 456.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-467 |  | 396.00 |  | 397.50 |  | 1.50 |  | 0.736 |  | 1.105 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 1.685 |  | 2.528
WR-468 |  | 465.00 |  | 465.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-469 |  | 396.45 |  | 401.55 |  | 5.10 |  | 0.471 |  | 2.400 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 1.078 |  | 5.496
WR-470 |  | 397.80 |  | 399.30 |  | 1.50 |  | 1.094 |  | 1.641 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 2.504 |  | 3.756
WR-471 |  | 394.35 |  | 395.35 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.172 |  | 0.172 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.393 |  | 0.393
WR-472 |  | 474.00 |  | 474.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-473 |  | 459.00 |  | 459.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-474 |  | 393.25 |  | 397.65 |  | 4.40 |  | 18.366 |  | 80.812 |  | 1.00 |  | 2.479 |  | 45.530 |  | 200.332
WR-475A |  | 392.35 |  | 393.35 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.052 |  | 0.052 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.120 |  | 0.120
WR-478 |  | 400.35 |  | 402.15 |  | 1.80 |  | 7.999 |  | 14.398 |  | 1.00 |  | 2.315 |  | 18.517 |  | 33.330
WR-479 |  | 396.25 |  | 398.25 |  | 2.00 |  | 0.274 |  | 0.549 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 0.628 |  | 1.256
WR-479 |  | 405.35 |  | 406.35 |  | 1.00 |  | 0.101 |  | 0.101 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.230 |  | 0.230
WR-481 |  | 459.00 |  | 459.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000
WR-482 |  | 414.00 |  | 414.10 |  | 0.00 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.00 |  | 2.291 |  | 0.000 |  | 0.000

TABLE 10-3 A DEPOSIT AND B DEPOSIT DRILL HOLE INTERSECTIONS WITH

GRADES>1.0% U3 O 8

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits

Hole No. |  | From |  | To |  | Thickness (m) |  | Grade (% U3 O 8) |  | GT |  | Cut-off (%) |  | Density |  | GxD |  | GxTxD
WR-273 |  | 405.00 |  | 411.00 |  | 6.00 |  | 62.605 |  | 375.630 |  | 0.05 |  | 4.872 |  | 305.012 |  | 1830.069
WR-401 |  | 404.55 |  | 412.95 |  | 8.40 |  | 38.484 |  | 323.262 |  | 1.00 |  | 3.227 |  | 124.187 |  | 1043.167
WR-306 |  | 406.50 |  | 414.00 |  | 7.50 |  | 33.246 |  | 249.344 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.978 |  | 99.006 |  | 742.545
WR-287 |  | 402.95 |  | 410.45 |  | 7.50 |  | 32.301 |  | 242.255 |  | 1.00 |  | 2.937 |  | 94.867 |  | 711.503
WR-305 |  | 402.00 |  | 408.50 |  | 6.50 |  | 31.674 |  | 205.881 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.911 |  | 92.203 |  | 599.318
WR-435 |  | 410.05 |  | 414.95 |  | 4.90 |  | 25.772 |  | 126.284 |  | 1.00 |  | 2.689 |  | 69.302 |  | 339.577
WR-437 |  | 408.25 |  | 412.85 |  | 4.60 |  | 21.972 |  | 101.071 |  | 1.00 |  | 2.572 |  | 56.512 |  | 259.954
WR-267 |  | 405.00 |  | 408.50 |  | 3.50 |  | 19.963 |  | 69.872 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.518 |  | 50.268 |  | 175.936
WR-474 |  | 393.25 |  | 397.65 |  | 4.40 |  | 18.366 |  | 80.812 |  | 1.00 |  | 2.479 |  | 45.530 |  | 200.332
WR-345 |  | 402.00 |  | 407.00 |  | 5.00 |  | 16.219 |  | 81.094 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.433 |  | 39.460 |  | 197.302
WR-403 |  | 394.50 |  | 413.00 |  | 18.50 |  | 14.959 |  | 276.738 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.409 |  | 36.036 |  | 666.661
WR-333 |  | 397.40 |  | 403.40 |  | 6.00 |  | 14.565 |  | 87.390 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.401 |  | 34.970 |  | 209.822
WR-286 |  | 398.50 |  | 409.00 |  | 10.50 |  | 14.405 |  | 151.252 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.399 |  | 34.558 |  | 362.855
WR-419 |  | 392.50 |  | 398.50 |  | 6.00 |  | 14.139 |  | 84.837 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.394 |  | 33.850 |  | 203.099
WR-259 |  | 397.00 |  | 403.00 |  | 6.00 |  | 13.381 |  | 80.285 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.381 |  | 31.860 |  | 191.158
WR-421 |  | 391.50 |  | 396.00 |  | 4.50 |  | 12.586 |  | 56.636 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.369 |  | 29.816 |  | 134.171
WR-342 |  | 406.00 |  | 416.00 |  | 10.00 |  | 12.409 |  | 124.085 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.366 |  | 29.359 |  | 293.586
WR-376 |  | 393.00 |  | 401.50 |  | 8.50 |  | 12.309 |  | 104.625 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.365 |  | 29.110 |  | 247.438
WR-405 |  | 391.50 |  | 396.00 |  | 4.50 |  | 12.216 |  | 54.974 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.364 |  | 28.880 |  | 129.959
WR-258 |  | 397.00 |  | 402.50 |  | 5.50 |  | 11.822 |  | 65.021 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.358 |  | 27.876 |  | 153.320
WR-294 |  | 398.05 |  | 399.75 |  | 1.70 |  | 10.459 |  | 17.780 |  | 1.00 |  | 2.34 |  | 24.474 |  | 41.606
WR-291A |  | 392.50 |  | 395.50 |  | 3.00 |  | 10.347 |  | 31.040 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.339 |  | 24.201 |  | 72.602
WR-299 |  | 400.50 |  | 406.00 |  | 5.50 |  | 10.202 |  | 56.111 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.337 |  | 23.842 |  | 131.131
WR-268 |  | 409.50 |  | 414.00 |  | 4.50 |  | 9.259 |  | 41.666 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.327 |  | 21.546 |  | 96.957
WR-269 |  | 408.25 |  | 409.75 |  | 1.50 |  | 9.094 |  | 13.640 |  | 1.00 |  | 2.325 |  | 21.142 |  | 31.714
WR-302 |  | 406.00 |  | 414.50 |  | 8.50 |  | 9.087 |  | 77.244 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.325 |  | 21.128 |  | 179.591
WR-409 |  | 405.00 |  | 414.00 |  | 9.00 |  | 8.309 |  | 74.784 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.318 |  | 19.261 |  | 173.349
WR-478 |  | 400.35 |  | 402.15 |  | 1.80 |  | 7.999 |  | 14.398 |  | 1.00 |  | 2.315 |  | 18.517 |  | 33.330
WR-343 |  | 409.50 |  | 415.50 |  | 6.00 |  | 7.449 |  | 44.696 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.31 |  | 17.208 |  | 103.247
WR-300 |  | 407.50 |  | 423.50 |  | 16.00 |  | 7.288 |  | 116.615 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.309 |  | 16.829 |  | 269.264
WR-311 |  | 402.50 |  | 409.00 |  | 6.50 |  | 6.879 |  | 44.712 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.306 |  | 15.862 |  | 103.106

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 10-18

| www.rpacan.com

Hole No. |  | From |  | To |  | Thickness (m) |  | Grade (% U3 O 8) |  | GT |  | Cut-off (%) |  | Density |  | GxD |  | GxTxD
WR-334 |  | 407.00 |  | 412.50 |  | 5.50 |  | 6.561 |  | 36.085 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.304 |  | 15.116 |  | 83.141
WR-318 |  | 400.40 |  | 413.40 |  | 13.00 |  | 6.249 |  | 81.232 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.302 |  | 14.384 |  | 186.997
WR-351 |  | 387.00 |  | 389.50 |  | 2.50 |  | 6.147 |  | 15.367 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.301 |  | 14.144 |  | 35.360
WR-413 |  | 400.00 |  | 406.50 |  | 6.50 |  | 5.717 |  | 37.162 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.299 |  | 13.144 |  | 85.436
WR-402 |  | 403.85 |  | 405.25 |  | 1.40 |  | 5.502 |  | 7.703 |  | 1.00 |  | 2.298 |  | 12.644 |  | 17.702
WR-347 |  | 398.60 |  | 405.10 |  | 6.50 |  | 5.445 |  | 35.390 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.297 |  | 12.506 |  | 81.291
WR-292 |  | 398.00 |  | 405.50 |  | 7.50 |  | 4.949 |  | 37.116 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.295 |  | 11.357 |  | 85.181
WR-335 |  | 402.00 |  | 404.50 |  | 2.50 |  | 4.914 |  | 12.285 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.295 |  | 11.277 |  | 28.193
WR-348 |  | 389.00 |  | 396.00 |  | 7.00 |  | 4.874 |  | 34.117 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.295 |  | 11.186 |  | 78.299
WR-290 |  | 399.00 |  | 409.00 |  | 10.00 |  | 4.203 |  | 42.027 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.292 |  | 9.633 |  | 96.326
WR-438 |  | 407.85 |  | 408.85 |  | 1.00 |  | 4.194 |  | 4.194 |  | 1.00 |  | 2.292 |  | 9.613 |  | 9.613
WR-404 |  | 414.00 |  | 417.50 |  | 3.50 |  | 4.166 |  | 14.582 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.292 |  | 9.549 |  | 33.422
WR-408 |  | 408.50 |  | 410.00 |  | 1.50 |  | 3.710 |  | 5.566 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.291 |  | 8.500 |  | 12.751
WR-274 |  | 409.70 |  | 420.50 |  | 10.80 |  | 3.516 |  | 37.973 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 8.052 |  | 86.958
WR-272 |  | 411.00 |  | 416.50 |  | 5.50 |  | 3.387 |  | 18.631 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 7.757 |  | 42.664
WR-328 |  | 371.50 |  | 373.00 |  | 1.50 |  | 3.352 |  | 5.029 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.29 |  | 7.677 |  | 11.515
WR-419 |  | 407.50 |  | 409.50 |  | 2.00 |  | 3.056 |  | 6.112 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 6.995 |  | 13.989
WR-383 |  | 393.00 |  | 395.00 |  | 2.00 |  | 3.006 |  | 6.012 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 6.881 |  | 13.762
WR-274 |  | 429.00 |  | 430.50 |  | 1.50 |  | 2.843 |  | 4.264 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 6.507 |  | 9.760
WR-399 |  | 402.55 |  | 405.25 |  | 2.70 |  | 2.655 |  | 7.168 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 6.077 |  | 16.408
WR-345 |  | 409.50 |  | 411.00 |  | 1.50 |  | 2.513 |  | 3.770 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 5.753 |  | 8.630
WR-306 |  | 421.50 |  | 422.50 |  | 1.00 |  | 2.320 |  | 2.320 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 5.310 |  | 5.310
WR-392 |  | 407.00 |  | 408.00 |  | 1.00 |  | 2.190 |  | 2.190 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.288 |  | 5.011 |  | 5.011
WR-308 |  | 404.50 |  | 406.50 |  | 2.00 |  | 2.152 |  | 4.303 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.288 |  | 4.923 |  | 9.845
WR-408 |  | 393.00 |  | 396.00 |  | 3.00 |  | 2.059 |  | 6.178 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.288 |  | 4.712 |  | 14.135
WR-417 |  | 389.50 |  | 406.00 |  | 16.50 |  | 2.051 |  | 33.834 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.288 |  | 4.692 |  | 77.412
WR-405 |  | 405.50 |  | 408.50 |  | 3.00 |  | 1.998 |  | 5.995 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.288 |  | 4.572 |  | 13.716
WR-327 |  | 401.50 |  | 409.00 |  | 7.50 |  | 1.962 |  | 14.712 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.288 |  | 4.488 |  | 33.662
WR-290 |  | 415.00 |  | 416.50 |  | 1.50 |  | 1.944 |  | 2.916 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.288 |  | 4.447 |  | 6.671
WR-301 |  | 405.00 |  | 413.50 |  | 8.50 |  | 1.918 |  | 16.299 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.288 |  | 4.387 |  | 37.292
WR-261 |  | 407.50 |  | 415.00 |  | 7.50 |  | 1.733 |  | 13.000 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.288 |  | 3.966 |  | 29.744
WR-276 |  | 422.00 |  | 424.00 |  | 2.00 |  | 1.572 |  | 3.145 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.288 |  | 3.598 |  | 7.195
WR-268 |  | 417.50 |  | 418.50 |  | 1.00 |  | 1.551 |  | 1.551 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.288 |  | 3.549 |  | 3.549
WR-269 |  | 416.55 |  | 417.55 |  | 1.00 |  | 1.487 |  | 1.487 |  | 1.00 |  | 2.288 |  | 3.402 |  | 3.402
WR-305 |  | 410.50 |  | 416.50 |  | 6.00 |  | 1.444 |  | 8.667 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 3.306 |  | 19.838
WR-344 |  | 400.00 |  | 404.50 |  | 4.50 |  | 1.365 |  | 6.142 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 3.124 |  | 14.059
WR-253 |  | 389.00 |  | 393.20 |  | 4.20 |  | 1.334 |  | 5.604 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 3.054 |  | 12.827
WR-446 |  | 410.20 |  | 411.70 |  | 1.50 |  | 1.316 |  | 1.974 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 3.012 |  | 4.518
WR-458 |  | 411.00 |  | 414.00 |  | 3.00 |  | 1.176 |  | 3.529 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 2.692 |  | 8.077
WR-266 |  | 413.50 |  | 417.00 |  | 3.50 |  | 1.152 |  | 4.033 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 2.637 |  | 9.231
WR-383 |  | 410.00 |  | 412.00 |  | 2.00 |  | 1.111 |  | 2.222 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 2.543 |  | 5.085
WR-295 |  | 391.25 |  | 394.95 |  | 3.70 |  | 1.106 |  | 4.093 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 2.532 |  | 9.370
WR-353 |  | 385.00 |  | 386.50 |  | 1.50 |  | 1.104 |  | 1.656 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 2.526 |  | 3.789
WR-470 |  | 397.80 |  | 399.30 |  | 1.50 |  | 1.094 |  | 1.641 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 2.504 |  | 3.756
WR-330 |  | 402.50 |  | 406.50 |  | 4.00 |  | 1.092 |  | 4.370 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 2.501 |  | 10.002
WR-281 |  | 404.50 |  | 408.50 |  | 4.00 |  | 1.072 |  | 4.288 |  | 0.05 |  | 2.289 |  | 2.454 |  | 9.815

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 10-19

| www.rpacan.com

11 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY

As described in Section 10 Drilling, core from the Phoenix Deposits is photographed, logged, marked for sampling, split, bagged, and sealed for shipment by Denison personnel at their field logging facility. All samples for assay or geochemical analyses are sent to the Saskatchewan Research Council Geoanalytical Laboratories (SRC) in Saskatoon, SK. Samples for clay analyses are sent to Rekasa Rocks Inc., in Saskatoon. All samples for geochemical or clay analyses are shipped to Saskatoon by airfreight or ground transport. All samples for U 3 O 8 assays are transported by land to the SRC lab by Denison personnel. SRC performs sample preparation on all samples submitted to them. There is no sample preparation involved for the samples sent for clay analyses.

The following sections are copied or paraphrased from the September 22, 2010 SRC Sample Report to Denison and from SRC 2009 documentation.

SAMPLE PREPARATION AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

SAMPLE RECEIVING

Samples are received at the site as either dangerous goods (qualified Transport of Dangerous goods (TDG) personnel required) or as exclusive use only samples (no radioactivity documentation attached). On arrival, samples are assigned an SRC group number and are entered into the Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS).

All received sample information is verified by sample receiving personnel: sample numbers, number of pails, sample type/matrix, condition of samples, request for analysis, etc. The samples are then sorted by radioactivity level. A sample receipt and sample list is then generated and e-mailed to the appropriate authorized personnel at Denison. Denison is notified if there are any discrepancies between the paperwork and samples received.

SAMPLE SORTING

To ensure that there is no cross contamination between sandstone and basement, non-mineralized, low level, and high-level mineralized samples, they are sorted by their matrix and radioactivity level. Samples are firstly sorted in their group into matrix type (sandstone and basement/mineralized).

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 11-1

| www.rpacan.com

Then the samples are checked for their radioactivity levels. Using a Radioactivity Detector System, the samples are classified into one of the following levels:

| • | “Red Line” (minimal radioactivity) <500 counts/second

| • | “1 Dot” 500 – 1,999 counts/second

| • | “2 Dots” 2000 – 2,999 counts/second

| • | “3 Dots” 3000 – 3,999 counts/second

| • | “4 Dots” 4000 – 4,999 counts/second

| • | “UR” (unreadable) >5,000 counts/second

The samples are then sorted into ascending sample numerical order and transferred to their matrix designated drying oven.

SAMPLE PREPARATION

After the drying process is complete, “Red line” and “1 dot” samples are sent for further processing (crushing and grinding) in the main SRC laboratory. This is done in the Basement preparation area. All radioactive samples at “2 dots” or higher are sent to a secure radioactive facility at SRC for the same sample preparation. Plastic snap top vials are labelled according to sample numbers and sent with the samples to the appropriate crushing room. All highly radioactive materials are kept in a radioactive bunker until they can be transported by TDG trained individuals to the radioactivity facility for processing.

Rock samples are jaw crushed to 60% passing -2 mm, Samples are placed into the crusher (one at a time) and the crushed material is put through a splitter. The operator ensures that the distribution of the material is even so there is no bias in the sampling. One portion of the material is placed into the plastic snap top vial and the other is put in the sample bag (reject). The first sample from each group will be checked for crushing efficiency by screening the vial of rock through a 2 mm screen. A calculation is then carried out to ensure that 60% of the material is -2 mm. If the quality control (QC) check fails the crushing is redone and checked for crushing efficiency; if it still fails the QC department is notified and corrective action is taken.

The crusher, crusher catch pan, splitter, and splitter catch pan is cleaned between each sample using compressed air.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 11-2

| www.rpacan.com

The reject material is returned to its original sample bag and archived in a plastic pail with the appropriate group number marked on the outside of the pail. The vials of material are then sent to grinding; each vial of material is placed in pots (six pots per grind) and ground for two minutes. The material is then returned to the vials. The operator then shakes the vial to check the fineness of the material by looking for visible grains and listening for rattling. The sample is then screened through a 106 µm sieve, using water. The sample is then dried and weighed, to pass the grinding efficiency QC there must be over 90% of the material at -106 µm. The material is then transferred to a labelled plastic snap top vial.

The pots are cleaned out with silica sand and blown out with compressed air at the start of each group. In the radioactive facility the pots are cleaned with water. Once sample pulps are generated they are then returned to the main laboratory to be chemically processed prior to analysis. All containers are identified with sample information and their radioactivity status at all times. When the preparation is completed the radioactive pulps are then returned to a secure radioactive bunker, until they can be transported back to the radioactive facility. All rejected sample material not involved in the grinding process is returned to the original sample container. All highly radioactive materials are stored in secure radioactive designated areas.

Sample preparation methods for the samples used in the Phoenix Mineral Resource estimate meet or exceed industry standards.

ANALYTICAL METHODS

METHOD: ICP1-URANIUM MULTI-ELEMENT EXPLORATION ANALYSIS BY ICP-OES

Method Summary: In ICP-OES analysis, the atomized sample material is ionized and the ions then emit light (photons) of a characteristic wavelength for each element, which is recorded by optical spectrometers. Calibrations against standard materials allow this technique to provide a quantitative geochemical analysis.

The analytical package includes 62 analytes (46 total digestion, 16 partial digestion), with nine analytes being analyzed for both partial and total digestions (Ag, Co, Cu, Mo, Ni, Pb, U, V, and Zn) plus boron. These samples are also sometimes analyzed for Au by fire assay means.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 11-3

| www.rpacan.com

Partial Digestion: An aliquot of pulp is digested in a digestion tube in a mixture of HNO 3:HCl, in a hot water bath for approximately one hour, then diluted to 15 mL using deionized water.

Total Digestion: An aliquot of pulp is digested to dryness in a hot block digestor system using a mixture of concentrated HF:HNO 3:HClO 4. The residue is dissolved in 15 ml of dilute HNO 3.

METHOD: U3 O 8 WT% ASSAY—THE DETERMINATION OF U3O8 WT% IN SOLID SAMPLES BY ICP-OES

Method Summary: When ICP1 U values are >=1000 ppm sample pulps are re-assayed for U 3 O 8 using SRC’s ISO/IEC 17025:2005-accredited U 3 O 8 (wt%) method. In the case of uranium assay by ICP-OES, a pulp is already generated from the first phase of preparation and assaying (discussed above).

Figure 11-1 shows a plot of Phoenix analyses by the Wt% Method against analyses by the Partial Method. It can be seen that the correlation is excellent.

Aqua Regia Digestion: An aliquot of sample pulp is digested in a 100 mL volumetric flask in a mixture of 3:1 HCl:HNO 3, on a hot plate for approximately one hour, then diluted to volume using de-ionized water. Samples are diluted prior to analysis by ICP-OES.

Instrument Analysis: Instruments in the analysis are calibrated using certified commercial solutions. The instruments used were PerkinElmer Optima 300DV, Optima 4300DV or Optima 5300DV.

Detection Limits: 0.001% U 3 O 8

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 11-4

| www.rpacan.com

11-5

| www.rpacan.com

METHOD: ICPMS1—THE MULTI-ELEMENT DETERMINATION OF SANDSTONE SAMPLES BY ICP-MS

Method Summary: In ICP-MS analysis, the ions are separated in a mass spectrometer on the basis of their mass-to-charge ratio, allowing determination of ions with atomic masses from 7 to 250. A series of detectors produce signals proportional to the concentration of the individual ions with analytical detection limits in the parts per billion range. Perkin-Elmer instruments (models Optima 300DV, Optima 4300DV, and Optima 5300DV) are currently in use. The samples generally analyzed by this package are non-radioactive, non-mineralized sandstones and basement rocks.

Total Digestion: An aliquot of pulp is digested to dryness in a hot block digestor system using a mixture of ultra pure concentrated acids HF:HNO 3:HClO 4. The residue is dissolved in 15 mL of 5% HNO 3 and made to volume using de-ionized water prior to analysis.

Partial Digestion: An aliquot of pulp is digested in a mixture of ultra pure concentrated nitric and hydrochloric acids (HNO 3:HCl) in a digestion tube in a hot water bath then diluted to 15 mL using de-ionized water prior to analysis.

Geochemical Analysis: ICP-OES: Multi element total digestion:

The ICP MS detection limits for total analysis include all elements except those noted below:

Al 2 O 3 , CaO, Fe 2 O 3, K 2 O, MgO, MnO, Na 2 O, P 2 O 5 , TiO 2, Ba, Ce, Cr, La, Li, Sr and Zr.

These elements are analyzed only by ICP for total digestion leaching. Instruments are calibrated using certified commercial solutions. The instruments used were PerkinElmer Optima 300DV, Optima 4300DV or Optima 5300DV.

Partial digestions by ICP MS: As, Ge, Hg, Sb, Se and Te are done on the partial digestion only, these elements are not suited to the total digestion analysis. The ICP-MS instruments used were Perkin Elmer Elan DRC II.

ANALYTICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL

The SRC laboratory has a Quality Assurance program dedicated to active evaluation and continual improvement in the internal quality management system. The laboratory is accredited by the Standards Council of Canada as an ISO/IEC 17025 Laboratory for Mineral Analysis Testing and is also accredited ISO/IEC 17025:2005 for the analysis of U 3 O 8. The laboratory is licensed by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) for possession, transfer, import, export, use, and storage of designated nuclear substances by CNSC License Number 01784-1-09.3. As such, the laboratory is closely monitored and inspected by the CNSC for compliance.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 11-6

| www.rpacan.com

SRC is an independent laboratory, and no associate, employee, officer or director of Denison is, or ever has been, involved in any aspect of sample preparation or analysis on samples from the Phoenix Deposits.

The SRC uses a Laboratory Management System (LMS) for Quality Assurance. The LMS operates in accordance with ISO/IEC 17025:2005 (CAN-P-4E) “General Requirements for the Competence of Mineral Testing and Calibration laboratories” and is also compliant to CAN-P-1579 “Guidelines for Mineral Analysis Testing Laboratories”. The laboratory continues to participate in proficiency testing programs organized by CANMET (CCRMP/PTP-MAL). All analyses are conducted by SRC, a Standards Council of Canada (CCRMP) certified analytical laboratory, which has specialized in the field of uranium research and analysis for over 30 years.

All instruments are calibrated using certified materials. Within each batch of 40 samples, two quality control samples are inserted (e.g. CG515 or LS4). One in every 40 samples is analyzed in duplicate; the reproducibility of this is 5%. Before the results leave the laboratory the standards, blanks, and split replicates are checked for accuracy, only when the senior scientist is fully satisfied with the results will they be issued. If for any reason there is a failure in an analysis the subgroup affected will be reanalyzed, and checked again. A Corrective Action Report will be issued and the problem is investigated fully to ensure that any measures to prevent the reoccurrence can and will be taken. All human and analytical errors are, where possible, eliminated. If the laboratory suspects any bias, the samples are reanalyzed and corrective measures are taken.

Quality control samples (reference materials, blanks and duplicates) are included with each analytical run, based on the rack sizes associated with the method. The rack size is the number of samples (including QC samples) within a batch. Blanks are inserted at the beginning, standards are inserted at random positions, and duplicates are analysed at the end of the batch. Quality control samples are inserted based on the following rack sizes specific to the method (Table 11-1):

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 11-7

| www.rpacan.com

TABLE 11-1 QUALITY CONTROL SAMPLE ALLOCATIONS

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits

Rack Size |  | Methods |  | Quality Control Sample Allocation
20 |  | Specialty methods including specific gravity, bulk density, and acid insolubility |  | 2 standards, 1 duplicate, 1 blank
28 |  | Specialty fire assay, assay-grade, umpire and concentrate methods |  | 1 standard, 1 duplicate, 1 blank
40 |  | Regular AAS, ICP-AES and ICP-MS methods |  | 2 standards, 1 duplicate, 1 blank
84 |  | Regular fire assay methods |  | 2 standards, 3 duplicates, 1 blank

SECURITY AND CONFIDENTIALITY

SRC considers customer confidentially and security of utmost importance and takes appropriate steps to protect the integrity of sample processing at all stages from sample storage and handling to transmission of results. All electronic information is password protected and backed up on a daily basis. Electronic results are transmitted with additional security features. Access to SRC Geoanalytical laboratories’ premises is restricted by an electronic security system. The facilities at the main lab are regularly patrolled by security guards 24 hours a day.

After the analyses described above are completed, analytical data are securely sent using electronic transmission of the results, by SRC to Denison. The electronic results are secured using WINZIP encryption and password protection. These results are provided as a series of Adobe PDF files containing the official analytical results and a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet file containing only the analytical results.

In RPA’s opinion sample preparation, security, and analytical procedures meet industry standards.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 11-8

| www.rpacan.com

12 DATA VERIFICATION

In order to verify that the data in the Phoenix Deposits database is acceptable for Mineral Resource estimation purposes, a review of the transfer of data from logging through to the final database was completed. The data files supplied by Denison comprised 229 drill holes for the Phoenix Deposits that included:

| • |  | Drill hole collar position data (electronic format)

| • |  | Down hole survey data (electronic format)

| • |  | Sample assays (electronic format)

| • |  | Borehole natural gamma data (electronic format)

| • |  | Lithology data (electronic format)

| • |  | Structure interpretation (electronic format)

| • |  | Property location maps (electronic format)

The data was supplied in .xls, .csv, .txt, .jpg or .dxf formatted files.

QA/QC PROGRAM

Denison has developed Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) procedures and protocols for all exploration projects operated by Denison, as described in Section 11 Sample Preparation, Analyses and Security. RPA reviewed Denison’s procedures and protocols and considers them to be reasonable and acceptable.

DRILL HOLE DATABASE CHECK

Denison conducted audits of historic records to assure that the grade, thickness, elevation, and location of uranium mineralization used in preparing the current uranium resource estimate correspond to mineralization. The quality control measures and the data verification procedures included the following:

| • |  | Surveyed drill hole collar coordinates and drill hole deviations were entered in the database, displayed in plan views and sections and visually compared to relative locations of the holes.

| • |  | Core logging information was visually validated on plan views and sections and verified against photographs of the core or the core itself when questions were raised during the geological interpretation process.

| • |  | Downhole radiometric probing results were compared with radioactivity measurements made on the core and drilling depth measurements.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 12-1

| www.rpacan.com

| • |  | The uranium grade based on radiometric probing was validated with sample assay results.

| • |  | The information in the database was compared against assay certificates and original probing data files.

The Phoenix Deposits drill hole database has been verified on multiple occasions by Denison geologists and external consultants. The resource database is considered adequate by RPA to prepare a Mineral Resource estimate.

EXTERNAL LABORATORY CHECK ANALYSIS

In addition to the QA/QC described above, Denison sends one in every 25 samples to the SRC’s Delayed Neutron Counting (DNC) laboratory, a separate lab facility located at SRC Analytical Laboratories in Saskatoon to compare the values using two different methods, by two separate labs.

The DNC method is specific for uranium and no other elements are analyzed by this technique. The DNC system detects neutrons emitted by the fission of U-235 in the sample, and the instrument response is compared to the response from known reference materials to determine the concentration of uranium in the sample. In order for the analysis to work, the uranium must be in its natural isotopic ratio. Enriched or depleted U cannot be analyzed accurately by DNC.

Per SRC (2009) documents the method summary for the DNC technique is as follows. Samples previously prepared as pulps for ICP Total Digestion are used for the DNC analysis. The pulps are irradiated in a Slowpoke 2 nuclear reactor for a given period of time. After irradiation, the samples are pneumatically transferred to a counting system equipped with six helium-3 detectors. After a suitable delay period, neutrons emanating from the sample are counted. The proportion of delayed neutrons emitted is related to the uranium concentration. For low concentrations of uranium, a minimum of one gram of sample is preferred, and larger sample sizes (two to five grams) will improve precision. Several blanks and certified uranium standards are analyzed to establish the instrument calibration. In addition, control samples are analyzed with each batch of samples to monitor the stability of the calibration. At least one in every ten samples is analyzed in duplicate. The results of the instrument calibration, blanks, control samples and duplicates must be within specified limits otherwise corrective action is required.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 12-2

| www.rpacan.com

Analysis for U by DNC incorporates four separate flux/site conditions of varying sensitivity to produce an effective range of analysis from zero to 150,000 µg U per capsule (samples of up to 90% U can be analyzed by weighing a fraction of a gram to ensure that there is no more than 150000 µg U in the capsule). Each condition is calibrated using between three and seven reference materials. For each condition, one of these materials is designated as a calibration check sample. As well, there is an independent control sample for each condition.

There are 48 assay pairs that used both ICP-OES Total Digestion and the DNC assay technique. Figure 12-1 shows the correlation between the SRC Geoanalytical Lab, and the SRC Analytical Lab. It can be seen that correlation is excellent. Uranium Grades obtained with the DNC technique were used only as check assays and were not directly used for Mineral Resource estimation

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 12-3

| www.rpacan.com

12-4

| www.rpacan.com

SAMPLE STANDARDS, BLANKS AND FIELD DUPLICATES

FIELD ASSAY STANDARDS

Analytical standards are used to monitor analytical precision and accuracy, and field standards are used as an independent monitor of laboratory performance. Six uranium assay standards have been prepared for use in monitoring the accuracy of uranium assays received from the laboratory. Due to the radioactive nature of the standard material, insertion of the standard materials is preferable at the SRC Geoanalytical Laboratory instead of in the field. During sample processing, the appropriate standard grade is determined, and an aliquot of the appropriate standard is inserted into the analytical stream for each batch of materials assayed.

Denison uses standards provided by its Wheeler River JV partner Cameco for uranium assays. Cameco standards are added to the sample groups by SRC personnel, using the standards appropriate for each group. As well, for each assay group, an aliquot of Cameco’s blank material is also included in the sample run. In a run of forty samples, at least one will consist of a Cameco Standard and one will consist of a Cameco Blank. Accuracy of the analyses and values obtained relative to the standard values, based on the analytical results of the six reference standards used, is acceptable for Mineral Resource estimates. Chronological plots for the six standards are shown in Figures 12-2 to 12-7 with upper limit (UL) and lower limit (LL) being equal to the mean + or – three standard deviations respectively.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 12-5

| www.rpacan.com

12-6

| www.rpacan.com

12-7

| www.rpacan.com

12-8

| www.rpacan.com

Denison employs a lithological blank composed of quartzite to monitor the potential for contamination during sampling, processing and analysis. The selected blank consists of a material that contains lower contents of U 3 O 8 than the sample material but is still above the detection limit of the analytical process. Due to the sorting of the samples submitted for assay by SRC based on radioactivity, the blanks employed must be inserted by the SRC after this sorting takes place, in order to ensure that these materials are ubiquitous throughout the range of analytical grades. In effect, if the individual geologists were to submit these samples, they would invariably be relegated to the minimum radioactive grade level, preventing their inclusion in the higher radioactive grade analyses performed by SRC. Figure 12-8 shows results of analyses of blank samples. It can be seen that most are below the upper limit of 0.013% U 3 O 8, with a maximum analysis of 0.024% U 3 O 8.

Analyses of duplicate samples are a mandatory component of quality control. Duplicates are used to evaluate the field precision of analyses received, and are typically controlled by rock heterogeneity and sampling practices. Core duplicates are prepared by collecting a second sample of the same interval, through splitting the original sample, or other similar technique, and are submitted as an independent sample. Duplicates are typically submitted at a minimum rate of one per 20 samples in order to obtain a collection rate 5%. The collection may be further tailored to reflect field variation in specific rock types or horizons. Figure 12-9 shows results of analyses of field core duplicates plotted against original analyses. It can be seen that results are satisfactory with a correlation coefficient of 98%.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 12-9

| www.rpacan.com

12-10

| www.rpacan.com

12-11

| www.rpacan.com

LABORATORY ASSAY DATABASE CHECKS

Denison carried out a check of the digital database used for resource estimation by verifying the resource database against original assay data received from the assay laboratory. The entire digital assay database was verified and only few minor errors due to data rounding were noted. RPA checked five of 28 drill holes in the A Deposit high grade domain and one of eight drill holes in the B Deposit high grade domain in the assay database against the SRK assay data and found no discrepancies. Based on the data validation by Denison and RPA and the results of the standard, blank, and duplicate analyses, RPA is of the opinion that the assay database is of sufficient quality for Mineral Resource estimation.

DISEQUILIBRIUM

Radioactive isotopes lose energy by emitting radiation and transition to different isotopes in a ‘decay series’ or ‘decay chain’ until they eventually reach a stable non-radioactive state. Decay chain isotopes are referred to as ‘daughters’ of the ‘parent’ isotope. When all the decay products are maintained in close association with uranium-238 for the order of a million years, the daughter isotopes will be in equilibrium with the parent. Disequilibrium occurs when one or more decay products is dispersed as a result of differences in solubility between uranium and its daughters, and/or escape of radon gas.

Knowledge of, and correction for, disequilibrium is important for deposits whose grade is measured by gamma-ray probes. Disequilibrium is considered positive when there is a higher proportion of uranium present compared to daughters. This is the case where decay products have been transported elsewhere or uranium has been added by, for example, secondary enrichment. Positive disequilibrium has a disequilibrium factor which is greater than 1.0. Disequilibrium is considered negative where daughters are accumulated and uranium is depleted. This so called ‘negative’ disequilibrium has a disequilibrium factor of less than 1.0 but not less than zero.

Disequilibrium is determined by comparing uranium grades measured by chemical analyses with the ‘gamma only’ radiometric grade of the same samples measured in a laboratory. There are practical difficulties in comparing chemical analyses of uranium from drill hole samples with corresponding values from borehole gamma logging, because of the difference in sample size between drill core (average grades in core or chip samples) and radiometric probe measurements (gamma response from spheres of influence up to one metre in diameter). Also, any probe calibration (and/or assay) error can be misinterpreted as disequilibrium. If the gamma radiation emitted by the daughter products of uranium is in balance with the actual uranium content of the measured interval (assay), then uranium grade can be calculated solely from the gamma intensity measurement.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 12-12

| www.rpacan.com

Denison routinely compares borehole natural gamma data to chemical assays as part of its QA/QC program as exampled in Figures 12-10 to 12-13. The downhole depths for gamma results in Figures 12-10 to 12-13 have not been corrected for depth so they do not correspond exactly to the chemical assay depths. Reasonable uranium grades can be calculated from the triple gamma probe (Geiger Mueller or GM tube) empirical data up to 80%. Above that the counts (the maximum count rate is about 3,500 cps) increase very little with increased grades due to the physical characteristics of the GM tube for two reasons (Sweet and Petrie 2010): Figure 12-14 plots radiometric grades against chemical assay grades for mineralized intervals in 30 drill holes with core recovery over 80% in A and B deposits. In general, radiometric grades are somewhat lower than chemical assay grades because:

| • |  | The Geiger-Mueller tube can become saturated at very high grades and it cannot count any higher.

| • |  | Some gamma rays are captured by the uranium, converted to photons, and absorbed (self-absorption), i.e. they are not available to the detector.

Denison and RPA carried out a check of the digital probe database used for resource estimation by verifying the resource database against original assay data. Denison and RPA concluded that in instances where core recovery was less than 80% radiometric data could be substituted for chemical assays and that the assay database was of sufficient quality for resource estimation.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 12-13

| www.rpacan.com

12-14

| www.rpacan.com

12-15

| www.rpacan.com

12-16

| www.rpacan.com

13 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING

No representative mineral processing or metallurgical testing studies have been carried out on the Phoenix Deposits. Mineralization in the Phoenix Deposits has very similar mineralogical and paragenetic characteristics to mineralization in other deposits in the region, including McArthur River, which is currently being mined.

The Phoenix Deposits are located approximately 40 km from the Key Lake Mill.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 13-1

| www.rpacan.com

14 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE

GENERAL STATEMENT

Denison has estimated Mineral Resources for the Phoenix A and B Deposits based on results of several surface diamond drilling campaigns from 2008 to 2012. The Denison drill hole database and Mineral Resource estimate have been audited by RPA with modifications made where necessary. Table 14-1 summarizes the Phoenix Deposits Mineral Resource estimate, of which Denison’s share is 60%. The effective date of the Mineral Resource estimate is December 31, 2012. Details of the resource estimation are given in the following sections.

TABLE 14-1MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE FOR THE PHOENIX DEPOSITS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2012 (100% BASIS)

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits

Category |  | Deposit |  |  | Tonnes |  |  | Grade (% U3 O 8 ) |  |  | Million lbs U3 O 8 |
Indicated |  |  | A Deposit |  |  |  | 133,500 |  |  |  | 15.8 |  |  |  | 46.5 |
Indicated |  |  | B Deposit |  |  |  | 19,000 |  |  |  | 14.1 |  |  |  | 5.9 |
Total Indicated |  |  |  |  |  |  | 152,400 |  |  |  | 15.6 |  |  |  | 52.3 |
Inferred |  |  | A Deposit |  |  |  | 6,300 |  |  |  | 51.7 |  |  |  | 7.2 |
Inferred |  |  | B Deposit |  |  |  | 5,300 |  |  |  | 3.5 |  |  |  | 0.4 |
Total Inferred |  |  |  |  |  |  | 11,600 |  |  |  | 29.8 |  |  |  | 7.6 |

Notes:

1. | CIM Definitions were followed for classification of Mineral Resources.

2. | Mineral Resources are reported above a cut-off grade of 0.8% U3O8, which is based on internal Denison studies and a price of $50 per lb U3O8.

3. | High grade composites are subjected to a high grade search restriction.

4. | Bulk density is derived from grade using a formula based on 165 measurements.

5. | Numbers may not add due to rounding.

DRILL HOLE DATABASE

The Wheeler River Project includes drilling results from 2008 to 2012, which comprise 229 diamond drill holes totalling 107,906 m, of which 168 drill holes totalling 77,939 m have delineated the Phoenix A and B Deposits. Phoenix A is the northeastern lens and strikes N52°E. Phoenix B consists of two subzones, B1 and B2 which form the southwestern part of the Phoenix Deposits.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 14-1

| www.rpacan.com

Upon completion of the initial data processing, the borehole data as well as radiometric logging information was uploaded into third party interpretation software (VULCAN, Surfer, Rockworks). These software packages allow geological and calculated uranium grade information to be added to the database. Table 14-2 lists details of the VULCAN database used for the Phoenix Deposits resource estimate. RPA has reviewed the database with Denison and agrees that it is suitable for Mineral Resource estimation.

TABLE 14-2 VULCAN DATABASE RECORDS

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits

Table Name |  | Number of Records
Collar |  | 239
Survey |  | 2,421
Stratigraphy |  | 2,263
U3O8 Assay Values |  | 1,589
eU3O8 Values |  | 164,339
A Deposit UC – Composites (Total / In Blkmdl) |  | 17,306 / 358
B Deposit UC – Composites (Total / In Blkmdl) |  | 17,301 / 103
A Deposit Basement – Composites (Total / In Blkmdl) |  | 17,297 / 87

Drill holes were completed on northwest-southeast oriented sections spaced at approximately 25 m intervals along strike with a drill hole spacing of approximately 10 m along the sections. Earlier holes were drilled at steep angles to the northwest and later holes were collared vertically. Figure 14-1 shows the A and B Deposits with locations of drill holes.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 14-2

| www.rpacan.com

14-3

| www.rpacan.com

GEOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION AND 3D SOLIDS

Denison has interpreted the geology, structure, and mineralized zones of the Phoenix Deposits using data from 168 diamond drill holes that penetrate the basal unconformity of the Athabasca sandstone. Uranium mineralization occurs at the unconformity surface and in the sandstone adjacent above and in the graphitic pelite basement rocks adjacent below.Both the A and B Deposits strike approximately N52°E and plunge at -2.5° to the northeast.

A regional fault, the WS Fault, is spatially associated with mineralization in the Phoenix Deposits. The WS Fault trends northeasterly parallel to the mineralization and dips moderately to the southeast. It appears to be a steep angle reverse fault, displacing the unconformity in the order of five metres or more upward to the southeast. Uranium mineralization extends outward to the southeast from the WS fault, suggesting that the primary controls on the Phoenix Deposits are the linear intersection of the WS Fault with the unconformity and graphitic pelite in the basement. Some uranium mineralization occurs on the northwest side of the WS Fault along the unconformity which is at lower elevation, but it is limited in extent to the northwest. Other faults are present in the Phoenix Deposits subparallel to the WS Fault but with lesser vertical displacements. Some cross faults with easterly or southeasterly trends are interpreted, with displacements in the order of five metres or more.

Denison developed three dimensional (3D) wireframe models for the A and B Deposits which represent 0.05% U 3 O 8 grade envelopes using the geological interpretation described above as guidance. The wireframe was reviewed by RPA and then modified to create a higher grade (HG) domain within each of the original wireframes. Those portions of the original wireframes that are not within the HG domains are designated lower grade (LG) domains. For Phoenix A, the threshold grade for inclusion in the HG domain was approximately 20% U 3 O 8, although lower grades were incorporated in places to maintain continuity and to maintain a minimum thickness of two metres. For Phoenix B, the minimum threshold for the HG domain was approximately 10% U 3 O 8 over a minimum distance of two metres. Figure 14-2 is a typical cross section of Phoenix A showing drill holes with one metre composite grades and the outlines of the HG and LG domains. Figure 14-3 shows the same for Phoenix B.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 14-4

| www.rpacan.com

The wireframe model developed for Phoenix A is approximately 330 m long, averages 30 m wide and is four metres thick. The Phoenix B wireframe model measures approximately 180 m long, averages 20 m wide and is approximately three meters thick. The wireframes were used to assign domain codes to the blocks in the block model and for generating and coding composited assays.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 14-5

| www.rpacan.com

14-6

| www.rpacan.com

14-7

| www.rpacan.com

DRY BULK DENSITY

Bulk density is used to convert volume to tonnage. In high grade uranium deposits such as Phoenix, bulk density varies with grade due to the very high density of pitchblende/uraninite compared to host lithologies. Bulk density also varies with clay alteration and in situ rock porosity. For Mineral Resource estimates it is important to estimate bulk density values throughout the deposit and to weight grade values by density since small volumes of high grade material can contain large masses of uranium oxide.

Bulk density is being estimated with specific gravity (SG) measurements on drill core. SG is calculated as: weight in air/(weight in air – weight in water). Under all reasonable conditions, SG (a unitless ratio) is equivalent to density in t/m 3.

During 2012, Denison completed a program of dry bulk density sampling from diamond drill core in order to establish the relationship between bulk density and grade for the Phoenix A and B Deposits. Dry bulk density samples were selected from the main mineralized zones to represent local major lithologic units, mineralization styles, and alteration types. Samples were collected from half split core, which had been previously retained in the core box after geochemical sampling. Samples were tagged and placed in sample bags on site, then shipped to the SRC in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. In total, SRC has performed SG measurements utilizing the wax immersion method on a total of 165 samples; 131 from A Deposit and 34 from B Deposit.

Correlation analyses by Denison of the bulk density values against uranium grades indicate a strong relationship between density and uranium grade (%U 3 O 8) (Figure 14-4). The relationship can be represented by the following polynomial formula which is based on a regression fit.

y = 0.0007x 2 - 0.0026x + 2.2908

where Y is dry bulk density (g/cm 3) and X is the uranium grade in %U 3 O 8 .

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 14-8

| www.rpacan.com

14-9

| www.rpacan.com

The regression curve is relatively flat below 10% U 3 O 8, with density relatively constant at 2.29 g/cm 3. At grades greater than 20%, dry bulk density increases with higher uranium grades. There are a number of strongly mineralized samples that have low dry bulk densities and vice versa which results in significant scatter in dry bulk density values. The lower bulk density values associated with strongly mineralized samples may be attributed to the amount of clay alteration in the samples. Generally, clay alteration causes decomposition of feldspar and mafic minerals with resultant replacement by lighter clay minerals as well as loss of silica from feldspar that lowers the dry bulk density of the rock.

Denison has estimated a dry bulk density value for each grade value in the drill hole database by using the polynomial formula shown above. In RPA’s opinion, the SG sampling methods and resulting data are suitable for Mineral Resource estimation at Phoenix.

RPA recommends that Denison take more density measurements to validate the Phoenix A Deposit points between 0.3% and 10%, and that Denison investigate multi-component regression incorporation uranium and Al 2 O 3.

STATISTICS

COMPOSITES

As discussed in Section 10 Drilling and Section 11 Sample Preparation, Analyses and Security, all drill core samples with chemical assays are 0.5 m long and all radiometric assays are 0.1 m long. Radiometric assays are used in lieu of chemical assays where core recovery is less than 80%. Approximately 20% of the drill holes used for the A Deposit resource estimate have radiometric assays and approximately 25% of those used for the B Deposit resource estimate have radiometric assays.

Denison has composited grade (G), bulk density (D), and grade multiplied by density (GxD) values over one metre run-length intervals to create a composite database for statistical analysis and block estimation purposes. As discussed below, block estimation was done by interpolating GxD and density and dividing them to obtain a weighted grade estimate for each block.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 14-10

| www.rpacan.com

Compositing was restricted to the wireframe models and separate composite files were prepared for A Deposit HG domain, A Deposit LG domain, B Deposit HG domain and B Deposit LG domain. Table 14-3 lists basic statistics of grade and GxD for each of these domains. Grades are weighted by density. Figure 14-5 shows histograms of grade for each of these domains. Composites begin in one meter intervals where a drill hole pierces a wireframe. This results in residual short composites at the bottom of the wireframes. These short composites were retained if they were between 0.5 m and 1.0 m long, but were added to the previous full length composite if they were less than 0.5 m long.

TABLE 14-3 BASIC STATISTICS OF GRADE AND GXD COMPOSITES FOR A AND B

DEPOSITS HG AND LG DOMAINS

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits

|  | A Deposit Grade |  |  | B Deposit Grade |  |  | A Deposit GxD |  |  | B Deposit GxD |
Statistic |  | HG |  |  | LG |  |  | HG |  |  | LG |  |  | HG |  |  | LG |  |  | HG |  |  | LG |
N |  |  | 79 |  |  |  | 261 |  |  |  | 18 |  |  |  | 73 |  |  |  | 79 |  |  |  | 261 |  |  |  | 18 |  |  |  | 73 |
Mean |  |  | 46.26 |  |  |  | 1.76 |  |  |  | 27.05 |  |  |  | 1.61 |  |  |  | 165.79 |  |  |  | 4.05 |  |  |  | 76.73 |  |  |  | 3.70 |
Median |  |  | 36.20 |  |  |  | 0.61 |  |  |  | 17.14 |  |  |  | 0.53 |  |  |  | 122.06 |  |  |  | 1.39 |  |  |  | 43.88 |  |  |  | 1.22 |
Minimum |  |  | 2.70 |  |  |  | 0.01 |  |  |  | 1.46 |  |  |  | 0.01 |  |  |  | 6.26 |  |  |  | 0.02 |  |  |  | 3.38 |  |  |  | 0.02 |
Maximum |  |  | 82.60 |  |  |  | 20.14 |  |  |  | 50.69 |  |  |  | 10.87 |  |  |  | 570.21 |  |  |  | 57.69 |  |  |  | 212.78 |  |  |  | 27.66 |
Std Dev |  |  | 24.67 |  |  |  | 2.93 |  |  |  | 16.37 |  |  |  | 2.64 |  |  |  | 151.81 |  |  |  | 7.45 |  |  |  | 70.41 |  |  |  | 6.43 |
CV |  |  | 0.53 |  |  |  | 1.66 |  |  |  | 0.61 |  |  |  | 1.64 |  |  |  | 0.92 |  |  |  | 1.84 |  |  |  | 0.92 |  |  |  | 1.74 |

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 14-11

| www.rpacan.com

Figure 14-5 Denison Mines Corp. Phoenix Deposits Northern Saskatchewan, Canada Grade Composite Histograms forAand B Deposits HG and LG Domains December 2012

14-12

| www.rpacan.com

TREATMENT OF HIGH GRADE VALUES

Capping or cutting of high grade samples is sometimes warranted for Mineral Resource estimation for scenarios when high grade outliers may have an undue influence on the estimation process producing an overestimation of the Mineral Resource. Although the Phoenix deposit is a high grade uranium deposit, adequate sample support, the use of high grade domains, and lack of apparent high grade outliers made high grade capping unnecessary. However, the influence of high grade values was restricted during the block estimation process as discussed below.

VARIOGRAPHY

For the Phoenix A Deposit, Denison prepared variograms of grade and GxD for the HG domain composite data and grade for the LG domain composite data. Variograms were prepared in the downhole direction, along a northeasterly strike direction, and horizontally across the strike direction. Variograms were of fair quality considering the limited number of composite data with a nugget effect of approximately 10% of the sill. The GxD variograms were similar to those of grade. The variograms suggested approximate ranges for the A Deposit HG domain of 2.4 m downhole, 35 m along strike, and 10 m or less across strike; and for the A Deposit LG domain 2.1 m downhole, 25 m or less along strike, and 25 m across strike. These ranges were used to derive search ellipse dimensions for block interpolations.

BLOCK MODEL INTERPOLATION

Three dimensional block models were constructed using Vulcan version 8.0.3 Mine Modelling Software. The variables for uranium grade, density and grade times density were interpolated using an inverse distance squared (ID2) algorithm for each mineralized domain. .Hard boundaries were employed at domain contacts so that composites from within a given domain could not influence block grades in other domains.

Blocks were five metres long along the main northeast trend, two metres wide across the main trend and one metre high. A whole block approach was used whereby the block was assigned to the domain where its centroid was located.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 14-13

| www.rpacan.com

The interpolation strategy involved setting up search parameters in two passes for each domain. Search ellipses were oriented with the major axis oriented parallel to the dominant northeasterly trend of the zones. The semi-major axis was oriented horizontally, normal to the major axis (across strike) and the minor axis was vertical.

GxD and density were interpolated into the model using the first pass. Blocks which did not receive an interpolated grade were then interpolated in the second pass which resulted in all blocks being populated. Block grade was derived from the interpolated GxD value by dividing that value by the interpolated density value for each block. Unweighted grades were also interpolated as a check.

In order to reduce the influence of very high grade composites, grades greater than a designated threshold level for each domain were restricted to shorter search ellipse dimensions. If the search ellipse contained a composite greater than the specified grade, it was used for interpolation only if it fell within the restricted search ellipse. The threshold grade levels were chosen from the basic statistics and from visual inspection of the apparent continuity of very high grades within each domain.

Search parameters are listed in Table 14-4 for the A and B Deposits HG and LG domains. Major axis is horizontal along the main mineralized trend of N52°E, semi-major axis is horizontal normal to the main trend, and the minor axis is vertical.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 14-14

| www.rpacan.com

TABLE 14-4 BLOCK MODEL INTERPOLATION PARAMETERS

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits

|  |  |  | Search Radii (m) |  |  | Composites |
Deposit and |  |  |  |  |  |  | Semi- |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Max per |
Domain |  | Pass |  | Major |  |  | major |  |  | Minor |  |  | Min |  |  | Max |  |  | DH |
A Deposit HG |  | First |  |  | 35 |  |  |  | 15 |  |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 2 |
|  | Second |  |  | 50 |  |  |  | 25 |  |  |  | 10 |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 2 |
|  | Restricted >60% U 3 O 8 |  |  | 15 |  |  |  | 6 |  |  |  | 4 |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 2 |
A Deposit LG |  | First |  |  | 35 |  |  |  | 15 |  |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 2 |
|  | Second |  |  | 50 |  |  |  | 25 |  |  |  | 10 |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 2 |
|  | Restricted >6% U 3 O 8 |  |  | 15 |  |  |  | 6 |  |  |  | 4 |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 2 |
B Deposit HG |  | First |  |  | 35 |  |  |  | 15 |  |  |  | 6 |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 2 |
|  | Second |  |  | 50 |  |  |  | 25 |  |  |  | 10 |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 2 |
|  | Restricted >40% U 3 O 8 |  |  | 15 |  |  |  | 5 |  |  |  | 4 |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 2 |
B Deposit LG |  | First |  |  | 35 |  |  |  | 15 |  |  |  | 6 |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 2 |
|  | Second |  |  | 50 |  |  |  | 25 |  |  |  | 10 |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 2 |
|  | Restricted >4% U 3 O 8 |  |  | 15 |  |  |  | 5 |  |  |  | 4 |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 2 |

Figure 14-6 is an isometric view looking north_ of the Phoenix A Deposit block model with colour coded grades. The blocks shown are mostly in the LG domain. Figure 14-7 is an isometric view looking north of the HG domain of the Phoenix A Deposit block model with colour coded grades.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 14-15

| www.rpacan.com

14-16

| www.rpacan.com

14-17

| www.rpacan.com

MINERAL RESOURCE CLASSIFICATION

The Mineral Resources for the Phoenix Deposits are classified as Indicated and Inferred based on drill hole spacing and apparent continuity of mineralization.

At the Phoenix A Deposit, the drill hole spacing is approximately 10 m on sections spaced 25 m apart and classification as Indicated is appropriate in RPA’s opinion for all of the LG domain and most of the HG domain. There is an area in the southwest-central part of Phoenix A where spacing between sections is approximately 35 m to 40 m and more drilling is required to increase the confidence in the HG domain. A strip 10 m wide between these sections is assigned to the Inferred category for the HG domain because of some uncertainty in the interpolated grades in this area of very high grades. At the southwest part of the HG domain, drill hole spacing between two sections is also approximately 35 m to 40 m and very high grade mineralization in drill hole WR-306 does not correlate well spatially with adjacent drill holes because its elevation is five meters lower than the others. This part of the HG domain is assigned to the Inferred category because of some uncertainty in the grade continuity in this area. Figure 14-8 shows these two areas of Inferred Mineral Resources along with Indicated Mineral Resources in the A Deposit HG domain.

At the Phoenix B Deposit, the drill hole spacing is approximately 10 m on sections spaced 25 m apart and classification as Indicated is appropriate in RPA’s opinion for most of the LG and HG domains. In the northeastern part of Phoenix B, drill hole sections are spaced at approximately 35 m and the most northeasterly drill hole does not correlate well spatially with other drill holes because its elevation is slightly lower than the others. This part of Phoenix B is classified as Inferred because there is some uncertainty in the continuity of grade in both the HG and LG domains. Figure 14-9 shows the area of Inferred resource along with Indicated resource at Phoenix B.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 14-18

| www.rpacan.com

14-19

| www.rpacan.com

14-20

| www.rpacan.com

BLOCK MODEL VALIDATION

The block models were validated by the following checks:

| • |  | Comparison of domain wireframe volumes with block volumes.

| • |  | Visual comparison of composite grades with block grades.

| • |  | Comparison of block grades with composite grades used to interpolate grades.

| • |  | Comparison with estimation by a different method.

In RPA’s opinion, the Mineral Resource estimate is reasonable and acceptable.

VOLUME COMPARISON

Wireframe volumes were compared to block volumes for each domain. This comparison is summarized in Table 14-5 and results show that the differences between the wireframe volumes and block model volume are less than 1%, except for the B Deposit HG domain where the difference is 4.2% due to the small volume of the wireframe combined with the whole block approach.

TABLE 14-5 VOLUME COMPARISON FOR WIREFRAME AND BLOCKS BY

DOMAIN

Denison Mines Corp. –Phoenix Deposits

|  | Wireframe |  |  | Block Model |  |  |  |
Deposit |  | Volume (m3) |  |  | Blocks |  |  | Volume (m3) |  |  | % Difference |
A Deposit HG |  |  | 14,781 |  |  |  | 1,479 |  |  |  | 14,790 |  |  |  | 0.06 | %
A Deposit LG |  |  | 56,936 |  |  |  | 5,703 |  |  |  | 57,030 |  |  |  | 0.17 | %
B Deposit HG |  |  | 3,109 |  |  |  | 324 |  |  |  | 3,240 |  |  |  | 4.21 | %
B Deposit LG |  |  | 15,142 |  |  |  | 1,506 |  |  |  | 15,060 |  |  |  | 0.54 | %

VISUAL COMPARISON

Block grades were visually compared with drill hole composites on cross sections, longitudinal sections and plan views. The block grades and composite grades correlate very well visually within the HG and LG domains of A Deposit and B Deposit.

STATISTICAL COMPARISON

Statistics of the block grades are compared with statistics of composite grades in Table 14-6 for all blocks and composites within the A Deposit and B Deposit HG and LG domains. Grades are weighted by density for the composites and tonnage for the blocks.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 14-21

| www.rpacan.com

TABLE 14-6 STATISTICS OF BLOCK GRADES COMPARED TO COMPOSITE

GRADES BY DOMAIN

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits

|  | A Deposit HG |  |  | A Deposit LG |  |  | B Deposit HG |  |  | B Deposit LG |
Statistic |  | Blocks |  |  | Comps |  |  | Blocks |  |  | Comps |  |  | Blocks |  |  | Comps |  |  | Blocks |  |  | Comps |
N |  |  | 1,479 |  |  |  | 79 |  |  |  | 5703 |  |  |  | 261 |  |  |  | 324 |  |  |  | 18 |  |  |  | 1506 |  |  |  | 73 |
Mean |  |  | 43.83 |  |  |  | 46.26 |  |  |  | 1.59 |  |  |  | 1.76 |  |  |  | 26.89 |  |  |  | 27.05 |  |  |  | 1.39 |  |  |  | 1.61 |
Median |  |  | 37.03 |  |  |  | 36.20 |  |  |  | 1.15 |  |  |  | 0.61 |  |  |  | 26.54 |  |  |  | 17.14 |  |  |  | 0.70 |  |  |  | 0.53 |
Minimum |  |  | 5.06 |  |  |  | 2.70 |  |  |  | 0.07 |  |  |  | 0.01 |  |  |  | 3.49 |  |  |  | 1.46 |  |  |  | 0.02 |  |  |  | 0.01 |
Maximum |  |  | 82.34 |  |  |  | 82.60 |  |  |  | 19.97 |  |  |  | 20.14 |  |  |  | 48.21 |  |  |  | 50.69 |  |  |  | 10.67 |  |  |  | 10.87 |
Std Dev |  |  | 15.41 |  |  |  | 24.67 |  |  |  | 1.59 |  |  |  | 2.93 |  |  |  | 10.57 |  |  |  | 16.37 |  |  |  | 1.74 |  |  |  | 2.64 |
CV |  |  | 0.39 |  |  |  | 0.53 |  |  |  | 1.01 |  |  |  | 1.66 |  |  |  | 0.41 |  |  |  | 0.61 |  |  |  | 1.26 |  |  |  | 1.64 |

In all cases the average block grades are lower than the average composite grades.

CHECK BY DIFFERENT ESTIMATION METHODS

RPA has carried out check estimates of the Denison ID2 block models of the Phoenix Deposits using two different methods: kriging and the contour method.

Kriging parameters were those discussed under Variography above and search parameters were the same as for the ID2 block model interpolation. For the kriging estimate, the tonnes, grade and contained pounds of U 3 O 8 correspond well for all domains.

For the contour method (Agnerian and Roscoe, 2002), grade times thickness times density (GxTxD) values for each drill hole intercept were plotted on plans and contoured. The areas between the contours were measured and multiplied by the average value in the contour interval. The GxTxD values are proportional to pounds of U 3 O 8 per square metre and the sum of these values times area are converted to total pounds of U 3 O 8 for each domain. Thickness times density (TxD) values were also plotted on plans and contoured. The areas between the contours were measured and multiplied by the average value in the contour interval. The sum of the TxD values multiplied by the area represents tonnage for each of the domains. The tonnes, grade and contained pounds of U 3 O 8 estimated by the contour method are within 5% overall of the Denison ID2 block model estimate and mostly within 10% for each domain with no cut-off grade applied.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 14-22

| www.rpacan.com

MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE

Table 14-7 lists the Mineral Resource estimate for the Phoenix Deposits by domain and resource category. The effective date of the resource estimate is December 31, 2012 and the cut-off grade is 0.8% U 3 O 8.

The cut-off grade of 0.8% U 3 O 8 is based on internal conceptual studies by Denison and a price of US$50/lb U 3 O 8 . The cut-off grade is consistent with the previous Phoenix Mineral Resource estimate reported in 2010. The HG domains are not sensitive to cut-off grades less than 5% U 3 O 8 but the LG domains are quite sensitive to cut-off grade.

TABLE 14-7 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE FOR THE PHOENIX DEPOSITS

AT A CUT-OFF GRADE OF 0.8% U3 O 8 AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2012

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits

|  | Deposit and |  |  |  |  | Grade |  |  | Million lb |
Category |  | Domain |  | Tonnes |  |  | (% U3 O 8 ) |  |  | U3 O 8 |
Indicated |  | A Deposit HG |  |  | 45,000 |  |  |  | 42.7 |  |  |  | 42.3 |
Indicated |  | A Deposit LG |  |  | 88,500 |  |  |  | 2.11 |  |  |  | 4.1 |
Indicated |  | B Deposit HG |  |  | 8,400 |  |  |  | 27.9 |  |  |  | 5.2 |
Indicated |  | B Deposit LG |  |  | 10,500 |  |  |  | 3.0 |  |  |  | 0.7 |
Subtotal Indicated |  | A Deposit |  |  | 133,500 |  |  |  | 15.8 |  |  |  | 46.5 |
Subtotal Indicated |  | B Deposit |  |  | 19,000 |  |  |  | 14.1 |  |  |  | 5.9 |
Total Indicated |  |  |  |  | 152,400 |  |  |  | 15.6 |  |  |  | 52.3 |
Inferred |  | A Deposit HG |  |  | 6,300 |  |  |  | 51.7 |  |  |  | 7.2 |
Inferred |  | B Deposit HG |  |  | 700 |  |  |  | 14.6 |  |  |  | 0.2 |
Inferred |  | B Deposit LG |  |  | 4,500 |  |  |  | 1.8 |  |  |  | 0.2 |
Subtotal Inferred |  | A Deposit |  |  | 6,300 |  |  |  | 51.7 |  |  |  | 7.2 |
Subtotal Inferred |  | B Deposit |  |  | 5,300 |  |  |  | 3.5 |  |  |  | 0.4 |
Total Inferred |  |  |  |  | 11,600 |  |  |  | 29.8 |  |  |  | 7.6 |

Notes:

1. | CIM Definitions were followed for classification of Mineral Resources.

2. | Mineral Resources are reported above a cut-off grade of 0.8% U 3 O 8 , which is based on internal Denison studies and a price of $50 per lb U 3 O 8 .

3. | High grade composites are subjected to a high grade search restriction.

4. | Bulk density is derived from grade using a formula based on 165 measurements.

5. | Numbers may not add due to rounding.

In RPA’s opinion, the estimation methodology is consistent with standard industry practice and the Phoenix Deposit Mineral Resource estimate is considered to be reasonable and acceptable.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 14-23

| www.rpacan.com

15 MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATE

This section is not applicable.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 15-1

| www.rpacan.com

16 MINING METHODS

This section is not applicable.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 16-1

| www.rpacan.com

17 RECOVERY METHODS

This section is not applicable.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 17-1

| www.rpacan.com

18 PROJECT INFRASTRUCTURE

This section is not applicable.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 18-1

| www.rpacan.com

19 MARKET STUDIES AND CONTRACTS

This section is not applicable.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 19-1

| www.rpacan.com

20 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, PERMITTING, AND SOCIAL OR COMMUNITY IMPACT

This section is not applicable.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 20-1

| www.rpacan.com

21 CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS

This section is not applicable.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 21-1

| www.rpacan.com

22 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

This section is not applicable.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 22-1

| www.rpacan.com

23 ADJACENT PROPERTIES

This section is not applicable.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 23-1

| www.rpacan.com

24 OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION

No additional information or explanation is necessary to make this Technical Report understandable and not misleading.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 24-1

| www.rpacan.com

25 INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS

Drilling at the Wheeler River Property from 2008 to 2012 has discovered and delineated the Phoenix uranium deposits at the linear intersection of the Athabasca sandstone basal unconformity with a regional fault zone, the WS Fault, and graphitic pelite basement rocks.

The Phoenix Deposits consist of the Phoenix A and Phoenix B deposits located approximately 400 m below surface within a one kilometre long, northeast trending, mineralized corridor. Both deposits contain a higher grade core within a lower grade mineralized envelope and extend southeastward from the WS Fault along the unconformity. Some mineralization also occurs on the northwest side of the WS fault but commonly at a slightly lower elevation.

Some uranium mineralization occurs in basement rocks below and adjacent to the Phoenix Deposits which suggests some potential for more of the same.

Mineral resources of the A and B Deposits have been estimated by Denison and audited by RPA based on 168 diamond drill holes totalling 77,939 m. Indicated resources total 152,400 t at 15.6% U 3 O 8 containing 52.3 million lbs U 3 O 8 . Inferred resources total 11,600 t at 29.8% U 3 O 8 containing 7.6 million lbs U 3 O 8.

More diamond drilling is warranted in the Inferred areas of the A and B Deposits, particularly in the vicinity of very high grade drill holes WR-401 and WR-306 in A Deposit. The Mineral Resource estimate should be updated after this drilling is completed to upgrade the Inferred resources to the Indicated category if justified by results.

In RPA’s opinion, a Preliminary Economic Assessment should be carried out on the Phoenix Deposits.

More diamond drilling is warranted to test other exploration targets on the Wheeler River Joint Venture, particularly along strike to the northeast and southwest of the Phoenix Deposits.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 25-1

| www.rpacan.com

26 RECOMMENDATIONS

The Wheeler River Joint Venture has a planned 2013 exploration program consisting of an approximately 48 hole diamond drill program with two rigs beginning in the first quarter of 2013. The budget for this program is C$6.8 million. Emphasis will be on exploration, particularly to the northeast of the Phoenix A Deposit, as well as other targets on the Wheeler River Property. RPA has reviewed the Wheeler River Joint Venture 2013 exploration program and concurs with the objectives and budget.

In addition to this work, RPA recommends six infill drill holes in the Phoenix A Deposit and four infill drill holes in the Phoenix B Deposit. The cost of this additional drilling would be approximately $1.2 million. RPA also recommends a Mineral Resource estimate update after the infill drilling and a Preliminary Economic Assessment on the Phoenix Deposits at an estimated cost of approximately $200,000.

RPA recommends that Denison continue to collect additional core density data to increase the confidence in densities of the entire grade range.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 26-1

| www.rpacan.com

27 REFERENCES

Agnerian, H., and W. E. Roscoe. “The Contour Method of Estimating Mineral Resources.” CIM Bulletin, v. 95, 2002: pp. 100-107.

Arseneau, G., and C. Revering.”Technical Report on the Phoenix Deposit (zones A & B) -Wheeler River project, Eastern Athabasca Basin, Northern Saskatchewan, Canada”. NI 43-101 Report for Denison Mines Corp., SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc., November 17, 2010.

Bosman, S.A., and J. Korness. “Building Athabasca Stratigraphy, Revising, redefining, and Repositioning.” in Summary of INvestigations, Volume2, Saskatchewan Geolgical Survey, Saskatchewan Ministry of Energy and Resources, Miscellaneouse Report 2007-4.2, CD-ROM, Paper A-8, 2007: 29.

Campbell, J.E. “Quaternary geology of the eastern Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan.” in EXTECH IV: Geology and Uranium Exploration Technology of the Proterozoic Athabasca Basin, Saskatchwean and Alberta, edited by Jefferson, C.W and Delaney, G., Geolgoical Survey of Canada Bulletin 588, 2007: 211-228.

Dahlkamp, F.J., and B. Tan. “Geology and mineralogy of the Key Lake U-Ni deposits, norther Saskatchewan, Canada.” in Geology, Mining, and Extractive Processing of Uranium: Institue of Mining and Metallurgy, edited by Jones, M.J., London, 1977: 145-157.

Jefferson, C.W., D.J. Thomas, S.S. Gandhi, P. Ramaekers, and et. al. “Unconformity-associated uranium deposits of the Athabasca Basin, Saskatchwan and Alberta.” in EXTECH IV: Geology and Uranium Exploration Technology of the Proterzoic Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan and Alberta, edited by Jefferson, C.W. and Delaney, G., Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin 588, 2007: 23-67.

Liu, Y., K. Bodnarchuk, L. Petrie, and R. Basnett. Wheeler River Project. Denison Mines Corp, 2011, 87.

Ramaekers, P., et al. “Revised gelogical map and stratigraphy of the Athabasca Group, Saskatchean and Alberta.” in EXTECH IV: Geology and Uranium Exploration Technology of the Proterozoic Athaasca Basin, Sakatchewan and Alberta, edited by Jefferson, C.W. and Delaney, G., Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin 588, 2007: 151-191.

Sweet, K., and T. McEwan. Discussion of probe quality and grade evaluation Dibwe-Mutanga Project. KenCo Minerals internal report for Denison Mines Zambia Limted, 2011.

Yeo, G.M., and G. Delaney. “The Wollaston Supergroup, stratigraphy and metallogeny of a paleoproterozoic Wilson cycle in the Tryans-Hudson Orogeyn, Sakatchewan.” in EXTECH IV: Geology and Uranium Exploration Technology of the Proterozoic Athabasca Basin, Saskatchwan and Alberta, edited by Jeffeson C.W. and Delaney, G., Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin 588, 2007: 89-117.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 27-1

| www.rpacan.com

28 DATE AND SIGNATURE PAGE

This report titled Technical Report on a Mineral Resource Estimate Update for the Phoenix Uranium Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Eastern Athabasca Basin, Northern Saskatchewan, Canada and dated December 31, 2012 was prepared and signed by the following authors:

|  | (Signed & Sealed) “William E. Roscoe”
Dated at Toronto, ON |  |
December 31, 2012 |  | William E. Roscoe, Ph.D., P.Eng.
|  | Principal Geologist

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 28-1

| www.rpacan.com

29 CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON

WILLIAM E. ROSCOE

I, William E. Roscoe, Ph.D., P.Eng., as an author of this report entitled “Technical Report on a Mineral Resource Estimate Update for the Phoenix Uranium Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Eastern Athabasca Basin, Northern Saskatchewan, Canada”, prepared for Denison Mines Corp., and dated December 31, 2012, do hereby certify that:

| 1. | I am a Principal Geologist with Roscoe Postle Associates Inc. of Suite 501, 55 University Ave Toronto, ON, M5J 2H7.

| 2. | I am a graduate of Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, in 1966 with a Bachelor of Science degree in Geological Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, in 1969 with a Master of Science degree in Geological Sciences and in 1973 a Ph.D. degree in Geological Sciences.

| 3. | I am registered as a Professional Engineer (No. 39633011) and designated as a Consulting Engineer in the Province of Ontario. I have worked as a geologist for a total of 46 years since my graduation. My relevant experience for the purpose of the Technical Report is:

| • | Thirty-one years of experience as a Consulting Geologist across Canada and in many other countries

| • | Preparation of numerous reviews and technical reports on exploration and mining projects around the world for due diligence and regulatory requirements

| • | Senior Geologist in charge of mineral exploration in southern Ontario and Québec

| • | Exploration Geologist with a major Canadian mining company in charge of exploration projects in New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and Newfoundland

| 4. | I have read the definition of “qualified person” set out in National Instrument 43-101 (NI43-101) and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as defined in NI43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a “qualified person” for the purposes of NI 43-101.

| 5. | I visited the Wheeler River Project on October 30, 2012.

| 6. | I am responsible for all Sections of the Technical Report.

| 7. | I am independent of the Issuer applying the test set out in Section 1.5 of NI 43-101.

| 8. | I have had no prior involvement with the property that is the subject of the Technical Report.

| 9. | I have read NI 43-101, and the Technical Report has been prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 and Form 43-101F1.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 29-1

| www.rpacan.com

| 10. | At the effective date of the Technical Report, to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, the Technical Report contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.

Dated this 31 st day of December, 2012

(Signed & Sealed) “William E. Roscoe”

William E. Roscoe, Ph.D., P.Eng.

Denison Mines Corp. – Phoenix Deposits, Wheeler River Project, Project #1997 |  |
Technical Report NI 43-101 – December 31, 2012 |  | Page 29-2