XML 29 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.6.0.2
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2016
Goodwill And Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

8. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

There were no changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for continuing operations as of December 31, 2016 and 2015. The carrying values of goodwill for CTU and AIU were $45.9 million and $41.4 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

We performed our annual impairment testing of goodwill as of October 1, 2016 and determined that none of our reporting units were at risk of failing the first step of the goodwill impairment test as of October 1, 2016.

In calculating the fair value for CTU and AIU, we performed extensive valuation analyses, utilizing both income and market approaches, in our goodwill assessment process. The following describes the valuation methodologies used to derive the fair value of our reporting units:

 

Income Approach: To determine the estimated fair value of each reporting unit, we discount the expected cash flows which are developed by management. We estimate our future cash flows after considering current economic conditions and trends, estimated future operating results and capital investments, our views of growth rates and anticipated future economic and regulatory conditions. The discount rate used represents the estimated weighted average cost of capital, which reflects the overall level of inherent risk involved in our future expected cash flows and the rate of return an outside investor would expect to earn. To estimate cash flows beyond the final year of our models, we use a Gordon Growth Model and terminal value approach and incorporate the present value of the resulting terminal value into our estimate of fair value.

 

Market-Based Approach: To corroborate the results of the income approach described above, we estimate the fair value of our reporting units using several market-based approaches, including the guideline company method, which focuses on comparing our risk profile and growth prospects to select reasonably similar for-profit postsecondary education publicly traded companies.

The determination of estimated fair value of each reporting unit requires significant estimates and assumptions, and as such, these fair value measurements are categorized as Level 3 per ASC Topic 820. These estimates and assumptions primarily include, but are not limited to, the discount rate, terminal growth rates, operating cash flow projections and capital expenditure forecasts. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in deriving those estimates, actual results could differ from those estimates. We evaluate the merits of each significant assumption used, both individually and in the aggregate, to determine the fair value of each reporting unit for reasonableness.

As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the cost basis, accumulated amortization and net book value of other intangible assets for continuing operations are as follows (dollars in thousands):

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2016

 

 

As of December 31, 2015

 

Non-amortizable intangible assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accreditation, licensing, and Title IV Program participation rights

 

$

1,000

 

 

$

1,000

 

CTU trade name

 

 

6,900

 

 

 

6,900

 

               Net book value, non-amortizable intangible assets:

 

$

7,900

 

 

$

7,900

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortizable intangible assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LCB trade name

 

$

1,400

 

 

$

1,400

 

LCB trade name, accumulated amortization

 

 

(800

)

 

 

-

 

               Net book value, amortizable intangible assets:

 

$

600

 

 

$

1,400

 

 

Amortizable intangible assets are fully amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives as of December 31, 2016. Our definite-lived trade name of $1.4 million has a remaining useful life of nine months. Amortization expense from continuing operations was $0.8 million, $0.1 million and $0.8 million, for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The amortization expense for 2015 and 2014 related to trade names of previously sold campus and courseware intangible assets.

As of December 31, 2016, net intangible assets include certain accreditation, licensing, and Title IV Program participation rights and trade names that are considered to have indefinite useful lives and, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 350—Intangibles—Goodwill and Other, are not subject to amortization but rather reviewed for impairment on at least an annual basis by applying a fair-value-based test.

We performed our annual impairment testing of indefinite-lived intangible asset balances as of October 1, 2016 and concluded that no indicators existed that would suggest that it is more likely than not that the remaining assets would be impaired. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in deriving those estimates, actual results could differ from those estimates. We evaluate the merits of each significant assumption used, both individually and in the aggregate, to test the fair value for reasonableness. Although we believe our projected future operating results and cash flows and related estimates regarding fair value are based on reasonable assumptions, historically projected operating results and cash flows have not always been achieved. We continue to monitor the operating results and revenue projections related to our CTU trade name and accreditation rights on a quarterly basis for signs of possible further declines in estimated fair value.