XML 32 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.21.1

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND CONTINGENCIES | 3 Months Ended
--- | ---
Mar. 31, 2021
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract] |
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND CONTINGENCIES | 12. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND CONTINGENCIES: From time to time in the ordinary course of business, the Company becomes involved in lawsuits, or customers and distributors may make claims against the Company. In accordance with ASC 450-10, Contingencies, the Company makes a provision for a liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. On April 1, 2016, Opticurrent, LLC filed a complaint against the Company in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging that the Company infringed one patent pertaining to transistor switch devices and seeking damages for the alleged infringement. The Company filed a motion to transfer the case to the Northern District of California, which the Court granted, and the case was assigned to a new judge in San Francisco following the transfer. On December 21, 2018, the Court granted the Company’s challenge to Opticurrent’s damages expert but denied the Company’s motion for summary judgment. Following a trial in February 2019, a jury issued a finding of direct infringement by the Company but found that the Company did not induce infringement, and awarded Opticurrent damages of $6.7 million. The Company challenged those findings in post-trial proceedings, and the Court granted one of the Company’s post-trial motions, reducing the damages award to $1.2 million. The Court of Appeals affirmed the original findings and the reduced damages award, but the Company believes Opticurrent made key disclaimers during reexamination proceedings after the original trial, giving rise to a motion to set aside the original judgment in view of a disclaimer, an issue that is currently on appeal to the Federal Circuit. Briefing on the Company’s appeal is expected to take place over the coming months, with oral argument and a ruling thereafter. The District Court has issued an order staying execution on the original judgment pending the Company’s appeal. As such, the Company continues to believe it has strong defenses, and intends to continue to vigorously defend itself against Opticurrent’s claims. On June 19, 2019, Opticurrent, LLC filed a follow-on lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California accusing more of the Company’s products of infringement and seeking damages for the alleged infringement of the same claim of the same patent asserted in the parties’ prior litigation, as described above. Limited discovery has taken place, but proceedings are currently stayed, and no schedule has yet been set for expert discovery, dispositive motions, or trial. The Company believes it has strong defenses, independent of the issue on appeal in the first case, and intends to vigorously defend itself against Opticurrent’s claims, with appeals to follow if necessary. On January 6, 2020, the Company filed a complaint against CogniPower LLC in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware for infringement of two of the Company’s patents and seeking a declaration of non-infringement with respect to patents that CogniPower had charged the Company’s customers with infringing, based on customer use of the Company’s products. In response, CogniPower filed a motion to dismiss the Company’s declaratory judgment claims on the basis that CogniPower had not threatened the Company directly with suit. That motion was granted, so CogniPower’s claims for infringement initially went forward separately in their lawsuit against the Company’s customers in the District of Delaware, but the Company filed a motion to intervene in that lawsuit and received a ruling allowing the Company to intervene in CogniPower’s customer lawsuit on February 1, 2021. Fact discovery is now under way, but the Company believes it has strong claims and defenses, and intends to vigorously defend itself against CogniPower’s claims against the Company’s technology, with appeals to follow if necessary. The Company is unable to predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty, and there can be no assurance that the Company will prevail in the above-mentioned unsettled litigations. These litigations, whether or not determined in the Company’s favor or settled, will be costly and will divert the efforts and attention of the Company’s management and technical personnel from normal business operations, potentially causing a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition and operating results. Currently, the Company is not able to estimate a loss or a range of loss for the ongoing litigation disclosed above, however adverse determinations in litigation could result in monetary losses, the loss of proprietary rights, subject the Company to significant liabilities, require the Company to seek licenses from third parties or prevent the Company from licensing the technology, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and operating results.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for legal proceedings, legal contingencies, litigation, regulatory and environmental matters and other contingencies. + References Reference 1: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 450 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/topic&trid=2127136 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_LegalMattersAndContingenciesTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration