XML 40 R21.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.8.0.1

Commitments, Contingencies, and Concentrations of Credit Risk | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Dec. 31, 2017
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract] |
Commitments, Contingencies, and Concentrations of Credit Risk | Note 13. Commitments, Contingencies, and Concentrations of Credit Risk See Note 11 with respect to future obligations under noncancelable operating leases. In the normal course of the Company’s business, there are various outstanding commitments and contingent liabilities such as commitments to extend credit that are not reflected in the financial statements. The following table presents the Company’s outstanding loan commitments at December 31, 2017.
($ in millions) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Type of Commitment |  | Fixed Rate |  |  | Variable Rate |  |  | Total |
Outstanding closed-end loan commitments |  | $ | 225 |  |  |  | 456 |  |  |  | 681 |
Unfunded commitments on revolving lines of credit, credit cards and home equity loans |  |  | 144 |  |  |  | 513 |  |  |  | 657 |
Total |  | $ | 369 |  |  |  | 969 |  |  |  | 1,338 |
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had $15.2 million and $12.7 million, respectively, in standby letters of credit outstanding. The Company has no carrying amount for these standby letters of credit at either of those dates. The nature of the standby letters of credit is a guarantee made on behalf of the Company’s customers to suppliers of the customers to guarantee payments owed to the supplier by the customer. The standby letters of credit are generally for terms for one year, at which time they may be renewed for another year if both parties agree. The payment of the guarantees would generally be triggered by a continued nonpayment of an obligation owed by the customer to the supplier. The maximum potential amount of future payments (undiscounted) the Company could be required to make under the guarantees in the event of nonperformance by the parties to whom credit or financial guarantees have been extended is represented by the contractual amount of the standby letter of credit. In the event that the Company is required to honor a standby letter of credit, a note, already executed with the customer, is triggered which provides repayment terms and any collateral. Over the past two years, the Company has only had to honor a few standby letters of credit, which have been or are being repaid by the borrower without any loss to the Company. Management expects any draws under existing commitments to be funded through normal operations. The Company is not involved in any legal proceedings which, in management’s opinion, could have a material effect on the consolidated financial position of the Company. The Bank grants primarily commercial and installment loans to customers throughout its market area, which consists of Anson, Beaufort, Bladen, Brunswick, Buncombe, Cabarrus, Carteret, Chatham, Columbus, Cumberland, Dare, Davidson, Duplin, Guilford, Harnett, Henderson, Hoke, Iredell, Lee, Madison, McDowell, Mecklenburg, Montgomery, Moore, New Hanover, Onslow, Pitt, Randolph, Richmond, Robeson, Rockingham, Rowan, Scotland, Stanly, Transylvania and Wake Counties in North Carolina, and Chesterfield, Dillon, and Florence Counties in South Carolina. The real estate loan portfolio can be affected by the condition of the local real estate market. The commercial and installment loan portfolios can be affected by local economic conditions. The Company’s loan portfolio is not concentrated in loans to any single borrower or to a relatively small number of borrowers. Additionally, management is not aware of any concentrations of loans to classes of borrowers or industries that would be similarly affected by economic conditions. In addition to monitoring potential concentrations of loans to particular borrowers or groups of borrowers, industries and geographic regions, the Company monitors exposure to credit risk that could arise from potential concentrations of lending products and practices such as loans that subject borrowers to substantial payment increases (e.g. principal deferral periods, loans with initial interest-only periods, etc.), and loans with high loan-to-value ratios. Additionally, there are industry practices that could subject the Company to increased credit risk should economic conditions change over the course of a loan’s life. For example, the Company makes variable rate loans and fixed rate principal-amortizing loans with maturities prior to the loan being fully paid (i.e. balloon payment loans). These loans are underwritten and monitored to manage the associated risks. The Company has determined that there is no concentration of credit risk associated with its lending policies or practices. The Company’s investment portfolio consists principally of obligations of government-sponsored enterprises, mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by government-sponsored enterprises, corporate bonds, and general obligation municipal securities. The Company also holds stock with the Federal Reserve Bank and the Federal Home Loan Bank as a requirement for membership in the system. The following are the fair values at December 31, 2017 of securities to any one issuer/guarantor that exceed $2.0 million, with such amounts representing the maximum amount of credit risk that the Company would incur if the issuer did not repay the obligation.
($ in thousands) Issuer |  | Amortized Cost |  |  | Fair Value |
Fannie Mae – mortgage-backed securities |  | $ | 154,606 |  |  |  | 153,561 |
Freddie Mac – mortgage-backed securities |  |  | 107,712 |  |  |  | 106,722 |
Ginnie Mae – mortgage-backed securities |  |  | 63,812 |  |  |  | 63,030 |
Small Business Administration securities |  |  | 34,821 |  |  |  | 34,378 |
Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta - common stock |  |  | 19,647 |  |  |  | 19,647 |
Federal Reserve Bank - common stock |  |  | 11,691 |  |  |  | 11,691 |
Bank of America corporate bonds |  |  | 7,000 |  |  |  | 7,153 |
Federal Home Loan Bank System - bonds |  |  | 6,500 |  |  |  | 6,440 |
Citigroup, Inc. corporate bonds |  |  | 6,035 |  |  |  | 6,096 |
North Carolina State municipal bonds |  |  | 5,589 |  |  |  | 5,608 |
Goldman Sachs Group Inc. corporate bond |  |  | 5,090 |  |  |  | 5,132 |
JP Morgan Chase corporate bond |  |  | 5,022 |  |  |  | 5,075 |
Fannie Mae – bond |  |  | 5,000 |  |  |  | 4,945 |
Financial Institutions, Inc. corporate bond |  |  | 4,000 |  |  |  | 4,175 |
Spartanburg, South Carolina Sanitary Sewer District municipal bonds |  |  | 3,851 |  |  |  | 3,982 |
Craven County, North Carolina municipal bonds |  |  | 3,532 |  |  |  | 3,623 |
Wells Fargo & Company corporate bond |  |  | 3,096 |  |  |  | 3,124 |
Eagle Bancorp corporate bond |  |  | 2,549 |  |  |  | 2,500 |
Freddie Mac – bond |  |  | 2,500 |  |  |  | 2,482 |
South Carolina State municipal bonds |  |  | 2,179 |  |  |  | 2,312 |
Cary, North Carolina municipal bonds |  |  | 2,023 |  |  |  | 2,049 |
Virginia State Housing Authority municipal bond |  |  | 2,003 |  |  |  | 2,010 |
The Company primarily places its deposits and correspondent accounts with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta, the Federal Reserve Bank, Pacific Coast Bankers Bank (“PCBB”), and Bank of America. At December 31, 2017, the Company had deposits in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta totaling $3.8 million, deposits of $368.4 million in the Federal Reserve Bank, deposits of $0.1 million in PCBB, and deposits of $55.4 million in Bank of America. None of the deposits held at the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta or the Federal Reserve Bank are FDIC-insured, however the Federal Reserve Bank is a government entity and therefore risk of loss is minimal. The deposits held at PCBB and Bank of America are FDIC-insured up to $250,000.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for commitments and contingencies. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 450 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/topic&trid=2127136 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 440 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/topic&trid=2144648 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration