XML 20 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
Significant Accounting Policies
9 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Organization Consolidation And Presentation Of Financial Statements [Abstract]  
Significant Accounting Policies

NOTE A – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of presentation

The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial reporting and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulations.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.  Additionally, certain prior period data, primarily related to discontinued operations, have been reclassified in the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes to conform to the current period presentation, as further described in this section.  These statements omit certain information and footnote disclosures required for complete annual financial statements and, therefore, should be read in conjunction with Ashland’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017.  Results of operations for the period ended June 30, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the expected results for the remaining quarter in the fiscal year.

On May 12, 2017, Ashland completed the distribution of its remaining 170 million shares of common stock of Valvoline Inc. which represented approximately 83% of the total outstanding shares of Valvoline Inc.'s common stock.  This separation from Valvoline represented a strategic shift in Ashland's business and qualified as a discontinued operation.  Accordingly, Valvoline's operating results and cash flows for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2017 have been classified as discontinued operations within the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.  See Note B for additional information on the separation of Valvoline Inc.

Subsequent to completing the separation from Valvoline Inc., Ashland's operations are managed within the following three reportable segments:  Specialty Ingredients, Composites and Intermediates and Solvents.

Use of estimates, risks and uncertainties

The preparation of Ashland’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities.  Significant items that are subject to such estimates and assumptions include, but are not limited to, long-lived assets (including goodwill and other intangible assets), income taxes and liabilities and receivables associated with asbestos litigation and environmental remediation.  Although management bases its estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, actual results could differ significantly from the estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Ashland’s results are affected by domestic and international economic, political, legislative, regulatory and legal actions.  Economic conditions, such as recessionary trends, inflation, interest and monetary exchange rates, government fiscal policies and changes in the prices of certain key raw materials, can have a significant effect on operations.  While Ashland maintains reserves for anticipated liabilities and carries various levels of insurance, Ashland could be affected by civil, criminal, regulatory or administrative actions, claims or proceedings relating to asbestos, environmental remediation or other matters.

New accounting standards

A description of new U.S. GAAP accounting standards issued or adopted during the current year is required in interim financial reporting.  A detailed listing of new accounting standards relevant to Ashland is included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017.  The following standards relevant to Ashland were either issued or adopted in the current period, or will become effective in a subsequent period.

In May 2014, the FASB issued accounting guidance outlining a single comprehensive five step model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers (ASC 606 Revenue from Contracts with Customers).  The new guidance supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, in an effort to converge the revenue recognition principles within U.S. GAAP.  This new guidance also requires entities to disclose certain quantitative and qualitative information regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of qualifying revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers.  Ashland has formed an implementation team that is continuing to evaluate the impact of the new standard on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the adoption method options available, as well as the overall impact the new guidance will have on the organization.  The assessment process consists of categorizing Ashland’s revenue streams and reviewing the current internal accounting policies and practices to determine potential differences that would result from applying the requirements of the new standard to revenue contracts.  Additional discussions and meetings with each revenue stream team have occurred to solicit input and to identify potential impacts and appropriate changes to Ashland’s business processes, systems and controls to support the revenue recognition and disclosure requirements under the new standard.  Based on various preliminary assessments conducted to date, Ashland has identified agreements with distributors and customers that are subject to rebate and incentive programs that could contain elements of material rights and/or variable consideration.  Ashland does not currently believe that these elements would result in a material change to how revenue would be recognized for these agreements.  Ashland is currently completing the last phase of its implementation, which includes final assessment documentation and internal control design for the new standard.  Ashland intends to adopt this standard using the modified retrospective approach and does not believe the impact will be material to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements but does expect there to be significant additional disclosures within the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.  This guidance becomes effective for Ashland on October 1, 2018.

In February 2018, the FASB issued guidance which permits entities to reclassify tax effects stranded in accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) as a result of U.S. tax reform legislation to retained earnings.  Additionally, this guidance requires entities to disclose whether they made an election to reclassify the tax effects and to disclose their accounting policy for releasing income tax effects from AOCI. This guidance becomes effective for Ashland on October 1, 2019.  Ashland is currently evaluating the impact this guidance may have on Ashland’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In March 2017, the FASB issued accounting guidance that will change how employers who sponsor defined benefit pension and/or postretirement benefit plans present the net periodic benefit cost in the Statement of Consolidated Comprehensive Income (Loss).  This guidance requires employers to present the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost in the same caption within the Statement of Consolidated Comprehensive Income (Loss) as other employee compensation costs from services rendered during the period.  All other components of the net periodic benefit cost will be presented separately outside of the operating income caption.  This guidance must be applied retrospectively.  Ashland elected to early adopt this guidance on October 1, 2017, which resulted in a reclassification of $3 million in income from the selling, general and administrative expense and cost of sales captions to the other net periodic benefit income caption in the Statement of Consolidated Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the nine months ended June 30, 2017.  The components of net periodic benefits income (costs) reclassified primarily relate to interest cost, expected return on assets, curtailments, settlements and actuarial gains and losses.  Ashland did not have to adjust the classification of service cost since it previously was recorded within the caption required by the new guidance.  See Note J for additional information on net periodic benefit costs.

In March 2016, the FASB issued new accounting guidance for certain aspects of share-based payments to employees.  This guidance requires all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies related to share-based payments to be recognized as income tax expense in the Statements of Consolidated Comprehensive Income (Loss) instead of additional paid-in capital, and changes the classification of excess tax benefits from a financing activity to an operating activity within the Statements of Condensed Consolidated Cash Flows.  This guidance also allows entities to make an accounting policy election to either estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest or account for forfeitures when they occur.  In addition, this guidance increases the amount an employer can withhold to cover income taxes on awards and still qualify for equity classification and requires that cash paid by an employer when directly withholding shares for tax-withholding purposes be classified as a financing activity within the Statements of Condensed Consolidated Cash Flows.  The guidance became effective for Ashland and was adopted on October 1, 2017.  The guidance specifically related to the Statements of Consolidated Comprehensive Income (Loss) was adopted prospectively while the guidance related to the Statements of Condensed Consolidated Cash Flows was adopted retrospectively, as required by the guidance.  Additionally, Ashland made a policy election to account for forfeitures when they occur across all share-based awards.  Upon adoption, the overall impact on Ashland's Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements was not significant.