Commitments and Contingencies	6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2015
Commitments and Contingencies	Commitments and Contingencies There were no significant changes to the contractual obligations reported in the 2014 Form 10-K other than those which occur in the normal course of business. In connection with various contracts and agreements, the Company has agreed to indemnify counterparties against certain third party claims relating to the infringement of intellectual property rights and other items. Generally, such indemnification obligations do not apply in situations in which the counterparties are grossly negligent, engage in willful misconduct, or act in bad faith. Based on the Company’s historical experience and the estimated probability of future loss, the Company has determined that the fair value of such indemnifications is not material to its consolidated financial position or results of operations. From time to time, the Company is involved in litigation and other proceedings, including matters related to commercial and intellectual property disputes, as well as trade, regulatory and other claims related to its business. Other than as described below, the Company believes that all current proceedings are routine in nature and incidental to the conduct of its business, and that the ultimate resolution of any such proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Following the Company’s announcement of the creation of a new class of common stock, referred to as the Class C common stock, par value $0.0003 1/3 per share, three purported class action lawsuits were brought against the Company and the members of the Company’s Board of Directors on behalf of the stockholders of the Company, the first of which was filed on June 18, 2015. These lawsuits were filed in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland, and have been consolidated into one action, In re: Under Armour Shareholder Litigation, Case No. 24-C-15-003240. The lawsuits generally allege that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties in connection with approving the creation of the Class C common stock, as well as in connection with recommending that certain governance related changes to the Company’s charter be submitted to stockholders for approval at a special meeting to be held on August 26, 2015. Among other remedies, these lawsuits seek to enjoin any further actions from being taken with respect to both the issuance of any shares of Class C common stock and the matters being voted upon by stockholders at the special meeting. The lawsuits also seek unspecified money damages, costs and attorneys’ fees. The Company believes that the claims are without merit and intends to defend the lawsuit vigorously. However, because of the inherent uncertainty as to the outcome of this proceeding, the Company is unable at this time to estimate the possible impact of this matter.

Commitments and Contingencies

There were no significant changes to the contractual obligations reported in the 2014 Form 10-K other than those which occur in the normal course of business.

In connection with various contracts and agreements, the Company has agreed to indemnify counterparties against certain third party claims relating to the infringement of intellectual property rights and other items. Generally, such indemnification obligations do not apply in situations in which the counterparties are grossly negligent, engage in willful misconduct, or act in bad faith. Based on the Company’s historical experience and the estimated probability of future loss, the Company has determined that the fair value of such indemnifications is not material to its consolidated financial position or results of operations.

From time to time, the Company is involved in litigation and other proceedings, including matters related to commercial and intellectual property disputes, as well as trade, regulatory and other claims related to its business. Other than as described below, the Company believes that all current proceedings are routine in nature and incidental to the conduct of its business, and that the ultimate resolution of any such proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Following the Company’s announcement of the creation of a new class of common stock, referred to as the Class C common stock, par value $0.0003 1/3 per share, three purported class action lawsuits were brought against the Company and the members of the Company’s Board of Directors on behalf of the stockholders of the Company, the first of which was filed on June 18, 2015. These lawsuits were filed in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland, and have been consolidated into one action, In re: Under Armour Shareholder Litigation, Case No. 24-C-15-003240. The lawsuits generally allege that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties in connection with approving the creation of the Class C common stock, as well as in connection with recommending that certain governance related changes to the Company’s charter be submitted to stockholders for approval at a special meeting to be held on August 26, 2015. Among other remedies, these lawsuits seek to enjoin any further actions from being taken with respect to both the issuance of any shares of Class C common stock and the matters being voted upon by stockholders at the special meeting. The lawsuits also seek unspecified money damages, costs and attorneys’ fees. The Company believes that the claims are without merit and intends to defend the lawsuit vigorously. However, because of the inherent uncertainty as to the outcome of this proceeding, the Company is unable at this time to estimate the possible impact of this matter.