XML 21 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
Fair Value Measurement
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurement

NOTE 5.

Fair Value Measurement

The carrying value of cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximated fair value as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.  At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 the fair value of the Company’s fixed-rate borrowings was $3.6 million and $2.4 million less than the historical carrying value of $266.2 million and $247.1 million.  The fair value of the fixed-rate borrowings was estimated using an income approach based on current interest rates available to the Company for borrowings on similar terms and maturities.

We consider as cash equivalents all highly liquid instruments with an original maturity of three months or less.  As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, our cash and temporary investments were with high quality financial institutions in Demand Deposit Accounts (DDAs) and Savings Accounts.

Restricted investments, as of June 30, 2018 of $24.1 million and December 31, 2017 of $24.2 million, consisted of mutual funds which are reported at fair value and are related to the liabilities of our nonqualified deferred compensation plan.  

The fair value of the contingent consideration related to the 2017 acquisition of Estenson was $1.1 million at June 30, 2018.  This valuation was based on significant inputs that are not observable in the market, which are referred to as Level 3 inputs. Key assumptions include the likelihood of the acquired business achieving target levels of EBITDA using a probability-weighted expected return method (“PWERM”).  The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration:

Balance at December 31, 2017

$

4,703

 

Change in fair value (1)

 

(3,571

)

Balance at June 30, 2018

$

1,132

 

 

(1)

We recorded an adjustment to the contingent consideration liability in the second quarter of 2018, resulting in an increase in income from operations.  The income was recorded under “General and Administrative” in the Consolidated Statement of Income.  The adjustment was the result of a change in the fair value of the contingent liability, which reflected two year EBITDA targets established prior to the close of the acquisition.

Our assets and liabilities measured at fair value are based on valuation techniques which consider prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets and liabilities. These valuation methods are based on either quoted market prices (Level 1) inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly (Level 2), or unobservable inputs (Level 3). Cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable are defined as “Level 1”, long term debt is defined as “Level 2”, and the Estenson contingent consideration is defined as “Level 3” of the fair value hierarchy in the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the Codification.