The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company and the operating partnership are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) applicable to interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Certain information and footnote disclosures required for annual financial statements have been condensed or excluded pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules and regulations. Accordingly, the interim financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying interim financial statements reflect all adjustments of a normal and recurring nature that are considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. References to number of properties and square feet are not covered by the auditor’s review procedures.

The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2019. The interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements in the 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. and Hudson Pacific Properties, L.P. and the notes thereto.

The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of the Company, the operating partnership and all wholly owned and controlled subsidiaries. The consolidated financial statements of the operating partnership include the accounts of the operating partnership and all wholly owned and controlled subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.

Under the consolidation guidance, the Company first evaluates an entity using the variable interest model, then the voting model. The Company ultimately consolidates all entities that the Company controls through either majority ownership or voting rights, including all variable interest entities (“VIEs”) of which the Company is considered the primary beneficiary. The Company

accounts for all other unconsolidated joint ventures using the equity method of accounting. In addition, the Company continually evaluates each legal entity that is not wholly owned for reconsideration based on changing circumstances.

The entity that consolidates a VIE is known as its primary beneficiary and is generally the entity with both the power to direct the activities that most significantly affect the VIE’s economic performance and the right to receive benefits from the VIE or the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could be significant to the VIE. As of June 30, 2019, the Company has determined its operating partnership and six joint ventures met the definition of a VIE. Four of the joint ventures are consolidated and two of the joint ventures are unconsolidated.

As of June 30, 2019, the Company has determined it is not the primary beneficiary of two joint ventures. Due to its significant influence over the unconsolidated entities, the Company accounts for the entities using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method, the Company initially records the investment at cost and subsequently adjusts for equity in earnings or losses and cash contributions and distributions.

On June 5, 2019, the Company purchased, through a co-ownership agreement with Blackstone, the Bentall Centre property located in Vancouver, Canada. The joint venture property-owning entity is structured as a tenancy in common under applicable tax laws. The Company owns 20% of this joint venture and serves as the operating partner. The Company’s net equity investment of this unconsolidated entity is reflected within investment in unconsolidated real estate entity on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company’s share of net income or loss from the entity is included within loss from unconsolidated real estate investments on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Refer to note 4 for details.

On June 16, 2016, the Company entered into a joint venture to co-originate a loan secured by land in Santa Clara, California. The Company owns 21% of the unconsolidated non-real estate entity. The Company’s net equity investment in the unconsolidated joint venture was $86 thousand as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, which is reflected within prepaid expenses and other assets, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of commitments and contingencies at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to acquiring, developing and assessing the carrying values of its real estate properties, determining the incremental borrowing rate used in the present value calculations of its new or modified operating lessee agreements, its accrued liabilities and its performance-based equity compensation awards. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience, current market conditions and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could materially differ from these estimates.

In February 2016, the FASB issued guidance codified in ASC 842, Leases (“ASC 842”), which amends the guidance in former ASC 840, Leases (“ASC 840”). The standard sets out the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases for both parties to a lease agreement (i.e., lessees and lessors). The new standard increases transparency and comparability most significantly by requiring the recognition by lessees of right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for those leases classified as operating leases. The Company adopted ASC 842 on January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective transition approach that must be applied for leases that exist or are entered into after January 1, 2019.

ASC 842 requires companies to identify lease and non-lease components of a lease agreement. Lease components relate to the right to use the leased asset whereas non-lease components relate to payments for goods or services that are transferred separately from the right to use the underlying asset.

ASC 842 provides transition practical expedients that must be elected together that allows relief from the requirement to (i) reassess whether any expired or existing contracts are considered or contain leases; (ii) reassess the lease classification for any expired or existing leases; and (iii) reassess initial direct costs for any existing leases that are in effect as of the date of adoption. The guidance also permits an entity to elect a practical expedient that provides relief from the requirement to assess whether an existing or expired land easement that was not previously accounted for as a lease under ASC 840 is considered in a lease under ASC 842. For lessors, the guidance provides for a practical expedient, by class of underlying asset, to elect a combined single lease component presentation if (i) the timing and pattern of the transfer of the combined single lease component is the same, and (ii) the related lease component, if accounted for separately, would be classified as an operating lease.

The Company elected the practical expedients above. The lessor practical expedient to combine lease and non-lease components was elected only for the Company’s leases related to the office properties. For the Company’s studio properties, the timing and pattern of the transfer of the lease components and non-lease components for studio properties are not the same and therefore the Company could not elect this practical expedient for the Company’s studio properties. The standalone selling price related to the studio non-lease components is readily available and does not require estimates.

The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. The Company’s operating lease agreements relate to ground lease assets and are reflected in operating lease ROU assets and operating lease liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

ROU assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent its obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at the commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. Variable lease payments are excluded from the ROU assets and lease liabilities and are recognized in the period in which the obligation for those payments is incurred. As the Company’s leases do not provide an implicit rate, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date, or the date of the ASC 842 adoption, in determining the present value of lease payments. The weighted average incremental borrowing rate used to calculate the ROU assets and liabilities was 5.7%. ROU assets also include any lease payments made and exclude lease incentives. Many of the Company’s lessee agreements include options to extend the lease, which we do not include in its minimum lease terms unless the option is reasonably certain to be exercised. Rental expense for lease

As a lessor, the Company’s recognition of revenue remained consistent with previous guidance, apart from the narrower definition of initial direct costs that can be capitalized. With the election of the lessor practical expedient, the presentation of revenues on the Consolidated Statement of Operations has changed to reflect a single lease component that combines rental, tenant recoveries, and other tenant-related revenues for the office portfolio. For the Company’s rentals at the studio properties, total lease consideration is allocated to lease and non-lease components on a relative standalone basis. The recognition of revenues related to lease components is governed by ASC 842, while revenue related to non-lease components is be subject to ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”).

The new standard defines initial direct costs as only the incremental costs of signing a lease. Internal direct compensation costs and external legal fees related to the execution of successful lease agreements that no longer meet the definition of initial direct costs under ASC 842 are accounted for as office operating expense or studio operating expense in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. Additionally, the Company may elect the practical expedients only for leases that have commenced before the effective date of the adoption of ASC 842. As a result of the adoption, the Company recognized $1.8 million as a cumulative adjustment to accumulated deficit for costs associated with leases that have not commenced as of January 1, 2019, that were previously capitalized and no longer meet the definition of initial direct costs in accordance with ASC 842. The Company recognized $0.3 million as cumulative adjustments to accumulated deficit related to other transition adjustments.

The Company has compiled an inventory of its sources of revenues and has identified the following material revenue streams: (i) rental revenues (ii) tenant recoveries and other tenant-related revenues (iii) ancillary revenues (iv) guest parking revenues and (v) sale of real estate.

Revenue Stream

Components

Financial Statement Location⁽¹⁾

Rental revenues

Office rentals, stage rentals and storage rentals

Office and studio segments: rental

Tenant recoveries and other tenant-related revenues

Reimbursement of real estate taxes, insurance, repairs and maintenance, other operating expenses and must-take parking revenues

Office segment: rental
Studio segment: rental and service revenue and other

Ancillary revenues

Revenues derived from tenants’ use of lighting, equipment rental, power, HVAC and telecommunications (i.e., telephone and internet)

Studio segment: service revenue and other

Guest parking revenues

Parking revenue that is not associated with lease agreements

Office segment: service revenue
Studio segment: service revenue and other

Sale of real estate

Gains on sales derived from cash consideration less cost basis

Gains on sale of real estate

The Company’s 2018 rental revenues are accounted for under ASC 840. The Company continues to recognize rental revenue from tenants on a straight-line basis over the lease term when collectability is probable and the tenant has taken possession of or controls the physical use of the leased asset.

The Company recognizes tenant recoveries related to reimbursement of real estate taxes, insurance, repairs and maintenance, and other operating expenses are recognized as revenue in the period during which the applicable expenses are incurred. The reimbursements are recognized and presented gross, as the Company is generally the primary obligor with respect to purchasing goods and services from third-party suppliers, has discretion in selecting the supplier and bears the associated credit risk.

Ancillary revenues and guest parking revenues have been accounted for under ASC 606 since the Company adopted this standard on January 1, 2018. These revenues have single performance obligations and are recognized at the point in time when services are rendered.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Month Ended June 30,
	2019		2018		2019		2018
Ancillary revenues	$	3,882	$	4,086	$	11,968	$	9,406
Guest parking revenues	$	5,267	$	5,861	$	11,714	$	11,274
Studio related tenant recoveries⁽¹⁾	$	720	N/A		$	995	N/A

In regards to sale of real estate, the Company applies certain recognition and measurement principles in accordance with ASC 606. The Company is required to evaluate the sales of real estate based on transfer of control. If a real estate sale contract includes ongoing involvement by the seller with the sold property, the seller must evaluate each promised good or service under the contract to determine whether it represents a performance obligation, constitutes a guarantee or prevents the transfer of control. The timing and pattern of revenue recognition might change as it relates to gains on sale of real estate if the sale includes continued involvement that represents a separate performance obligation.