XML 26 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.25.0.1
Deferred Costs, Acquired Lease Intangibles and Goodwill
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2024
Deferred Costs, Capitalized, Prepaid, and Other Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Deferred Costs, Acquired Lease Intangibles and Goodwill Deferred Costs, Acquired Lease Intangibles and Goodwill
Deferred costs, net, consisted of the following:
(amounts in thousands)December 31, 2024December 31, 2023
Deferred leasing costs$230,836 $224,295 
Acquired in-place lease value, acquired deferred leasing costs and deferred acquisition costs137,580 158,267 
Acquired above-market leases19,636 23,918 
Total deferred costs, excluding deferred financing costs388,052 406,480 
Less: accumulated amortization(212,972)(236,900)
Total deferred costs, net, excluding net deferred financing costs175,080 169,580 
Deferred financing costs associated with the unsecured revolving credit facility, net of accumulated amortization of $7,783 and $5,709, respectively (See Note 5) and other deferred financing costs
8,907 2,877 
Total deferred costs, net$183,987 $172,457 
Acquired below-market ground leases, net, consisted of the following:
(amounts in thousands)December 31, 2024December 31, 2023
Acquired below-market ground leases$396,916 $396,916 
Less: accumulated amortization(83,506)(75,675)
Acquired below-market ground leases, net$313,410 $321,241 
Acquired below-market leases, net, consisted of the following:    
(amounts in thousands)December 31, 2024December 31, 2023
Acquired below-market leases$(56,359)$(55,155)
Less: accumulated amortization36,862 41,405 
Acquired below-market leases, net$(19,497)$(13,750)
The total amortization related to deferred costs and acquired lease intangibles consisted of the following:
Year Ended December 31,
(amounts in thousands)202420232022
Rental revenue:
Amortization of below-market leases, net of above-market leases$2,177 $2,415 $4,759 
Depreciation and amortization:
Amortization of deferred leasing costs and acquired deferred leasing costs22,469 23,612 25,448 
Amortization related to acquired in-place lease value5,196 7,421 11,839 
The remaining weighted-average amortization periods as of December 31, 2024 are:
Weighted-average amortization period
Below-market ground leases
42.6 years
Above-market leases
5.8 years
In-place leases and deferred leasing costs
5.8 years
Below-market leases
6.0 years
We expect to recognize amortization expense and rental revenue from the acquired intangible assets and liabilities as follows (amounts in thousands):
For the year ending:Future Ground Rent AmortizationFuture Amortization ExpenseFuture Rental Revenue
2025$7,831 $8,159 $3,513 
20267,831 6,999 2,110 
20277,831 6,057 1,551 
20287,831 5,265 1,360 
20297,831 3,172 516 
Thereafter274,255 4,395 3,389 
$313,410 $34,047 $12,439 
As of December 31, 2024, we had goodwill of $491.5 million. In 2013, we acquired the interests in Empire State Building Company, L.L.C. and 501 Seventh Avenue Associates, L.L.C. for an amount in excess of their net tangible and identified intangible assets and liabilities and as a result we recorded goodwill related to the transaction. Goodwill was allocated $227.5 million to the Observatory operations of the Empire State Building, $250.8 million to Empire State Building, and $13.2 million to 501 Seventh Avenue.
We performed our annual goodwill testing in October 2024, where we bypassed the optional qualitative goodwill impairment assessment and proceeded directly to a quantitative assessment of the Observatory reportable segment and engaged a third-party valuation consulting firm to perform the valuation process. The quantitative analysis used a combination of the discounted cash flow method (a form of the income approach) utilizing Level 3 unobservable inputs and the guideline company method (a form of the market approach). Significant assumptions under the former included revenue and cost projections, weighted average cost of capital, long-term growth rate and income tax considerations while the latter included guideline company enterprise values, revenue multiples, EBITDA multiples and control premium rates. Our methodology to review goodwill impairment, which included a significant amount of judgment and estimates, provided a reasonable basis to determine whether impairment had occurred. The quantitative analysis performed concluded the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value. Many of the factors employed in determining whether or not goodwill is impaired are outside of our control, and it is reasonably likely that assumptions and estimates will change in future periods.