XML 60 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2012
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
6. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill — Goodwill by operating segment as of March 31, 2012 and changes for the three months then ended are as follows (in thousands):

 

     Contract
Drilling
     Pressure
Pumping
     Total  

Balance December 31, 2011

   $ 86,234       $ 67,575       $ 153,809   

Changes to goodwill

     —           —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance March 31, 2012

   $ 86,234       $ 67,575       $ 153,809   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

There were no accumulated impairment losses as of March 31, 2012 or December 31, 2011.

Goodwill is evaluated at least annually on December 31 to determine if the fair value of recorded goodwill has decreased below its carrying value. For purposes of impairment testing, goodwill is evaluated at the reporting unit level. The Company’s reporting units for impairment testing have been determined to be its operating segments. Goodwill impairment is measured using a two-step impairment test. The first step is to compare the fair value of an entity’s reporting units to the respective carrying value of those reporting units. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value the second step of the impairment test is performed whereby the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to its identifiable tangible and intangible assets and liabilities with any remaining fair value representing the fair value of goodwill. If the resulting fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying value of goodwill, an impairment loss would be recognized in the amount of the shortfall.

Intangible Assets — Intangible assets were recorded in the pressure pumping operating segment in connection with the fourth quarter 2010 acquisition of the assets of a pressure pumping business. As a result of the purchase price allocation, the Company recorded intangible assets related to a non-compete agreement and the customer relationships acquired. These intangible assets were recorded at fair value on the date of acquisition.

The non-compete agreement has a term of three years from October 1, 2010. The value of this agreement was estimated using a with and without scenario where cash flows were projected through the term of the agreement assuming the agreement is in place and compared to cash flows assuming the non-compete agreement was not in place. The intangible asset associated with the non-compete agreement is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the three-year term of the agreement. Amortization expense of $117,000 was recorded in the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 associated with the non-compete agreement.

The value of the customer relationships was estimated using a multi-period excess earnings model to determine the present value of the projected cash flows associated with the customers in place at the time of the acquisition and taking into account a contributory asset charge. The resulting intangible asset is being amortized on a straight-line basis over seven years. Amortization expense of $911,000 was recorded in the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 associated with customer relationships.

The following table presents the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of intangible assets as of March 31, 2012 (in thousands):

 

     Gross
Carrying

Amount
     Accumulated
Amortization
    Net Carrying
Amount
 

Non-compete agreement

   $ 1,400       $ (700   $ 700   

Customer relationships

     25,500         (5,463     20,037   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total intangible assets

   $ 26,900       $ (6,163   $ 20,737