XML 62 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2014
Goodwill and Intangible Assets

5. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill — Goodwill by operating segment as of June 30, 2014 and changes for the six months then ended are as follows (in thousands):

 

     Contract
Drilling
     Pressure
Pumping
     Total  

Balance December 31, 2013

   $ 86,234       $ 67,575       $ 153,809   

Changes to goodwill

     —           11,655         11,655   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance June 30, 2014

   $ 86,234       $ 79,230       $ 165,464   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

There were no accumulated impairment losses as of June 30, 2014 or December 31, 2013.

Goodwill is evaluated at least annually on December 31, or when circumstances require, to determine if the fair value of recorded goodwill has decreased below its carrying value. For purposes of impairment testing, goodwill is evaluated at the reporting unit level. The Company’s reporting units for impairment testing have been determined to be its operating segments. The Company first determines whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value after considering qualitative, market and other factors. If so, then goodwill impairment is determined using a two-step impairment test. From time to time, the Company may perform the first step of the quantitative testing for goodwill impairment in lieu of performing the qualitative assessment. The first step is to compare the fair value of an entity’s reporting units to the respective carrying value of those reporting units. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the impairment test is performed whereby the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to its identifiable tangible and intangible assets and liabilities with any remaining fair value representing the fair value of goodwill. If this resulting fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying value of goodwill, an impairment loss would be recognized in the amount of the shortfall.

Intangible Assets — Intangible assets were recorded in the pressure pumping operating segment in connection with the fourth quarter 2010 acquisition of the assets of a pressure pumping business. As a result of the purchase price allocation, the Company recorded intangible assets related to the customer relationships acquired and a non-compete agreement. These intangible assets were recorded at fair value on the date of acquisition.

The value of the customer relationships was estimated using a multi-period excess earnings model to determine the present value of the projected cash flows associated with the customers in place at the time of the acquisition and taking into account a contributory asset charge. The resulting intangible asset is being amortized on a straight-line basis over seven years. Amortization expense of approximately $911,000 was recorded in the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 and amortization expense of approximately $1.8 million was recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 associated with customer relationships.

The following table presents the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of the customer relationships as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (in thousands):

 

     June 30, 2014      December 31, 2013  
     Gross
Carrying

Amount
     Accumulated
Amortization
    Net
Carrying

Amount
     Gross
Carrying

Amount
     Accumulated
Amortization
    Net
Carrying

Amount
 

Customer relationships

   $ 25,500       $ (13,661   $ 11,839       $ 25,500       $ (11,839   $ 13,661   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

The non-compete agreement had a term of three years from October 1, 2010. The value of this agreement was estimated using a with and without scenario where cash flows were projected through the term of the agreement assuming this agreement was in place and compared to cash flows assuming the non-compete agreement was not in place. The intangible asset associated with the non-compete agreement was amortized on a straight-line basis over the three-year term of the agreement and was fully amortized by September 30, 2013. Amortization expense of approximately $117,000 was recorded in the three months ended June 30, 2013 and amortization expense of approximately $233,000 was recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2013 associated with the non-compete agreement.