XML 65 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.0.814
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2015
Goodwill And Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Intangible Assets

5. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill — Goodwill by operating segment as of September 30, 2015 and changes for the nine months then ended are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Contract

 

 

Pressure

 

 

 

 

 

 

Drilling

 

 

Pumping

 

 

Total

 

Balance, December 31, 2014

$

86,234

 

 

$

124,561

 

 

$

210,795

 

Changes to goodwill

 

 

 

(124,561

)

 

 

(124,561

)

Balance, September 30, 2015

$

86,234

 

 

$

 

 

$

86,234

 

 

There were no accumulated impairment losses related to the goodwill in the contract drilling operating segment as of September 30, 2015 or December 31, 2014.

Goodwill is evaluated at least annually as of December 31, or when circumstances require, to determine if the fair value of recorded goodwill has decreased below its carrying value.  For purposes of impairment testing, goodwill is evaluated at the reporting unit level.  The Company’s reporting units for impairment testing have been determined to be its operating segments.  The Company first determines whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value after considering qualitative, market and other factors.  If so, then goodwill impairment is determined using a two-step impairment test.  From time to time, the Company may perform the first step of the quantitative testing for goodwill impairment in lieu of performing the qualitative assessment.  The first step is to compare the fair value of an entity’s reporting units to the respective carrying value of those reporting units.  If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the impairment test is performed whereby the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to its identifiable tangible and intangible assets and liabilities with any remaining fair value representing the fair value of goodwill.  If this resulting fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying value of goodwill, an impairment loss would be recognized in the amount of the shortfall.

 

During the first quarter of 2015, oil prices averaged $48.54 per barrel and reached a low of $43.39 per barrel on March 17, 2015.  Oil prices improved during the second quarter of 2015 and averaged $57.85 per barrel.  Although the price improvement was earlier than the Company projected, this improvement was generally consistent with the Company’s assumption at December 31, 2014, that oil prices would improve in late 2015 and continue to improve in 2016, resulting in improved activity levels for both the contract drilling and pressure pumping businesses.  During the second quarter of 2015 as oil prices increased, the Company received requests from customers to reactivate drilling rigs to resume operations in the third quarter of 2015.  The Company believed this was an indication that future activity levels would be improving for both the contract drilling and pressure pumping businesses.  During the third quarter of 2015, however, oil prices declined and averaged $46.42 per barrel and reached a new low for 2015 of $38.22 per barrel on August 24, 2015.  With lower oil prices in August, the Company lowered its expectations with respect to future activity levels in both the contract drilling and pressure pumping businesses.  In light of the Company’s revised expectations of the duration of the lower oil and natural gas commodity price environment and the related deterioration of the markets for contract drilling and pressure pumping services during the third quarter of 2015, the Company performed a goodwill impairment test as of September 30, 2015.  In completing the first step of the analysis, the fair value of each reporting unit was estimated using both the income and market valuation methods. The estimate of the fair value of each reporting unit required the use of significant unobservable inputs, representative of a Level 3 fair value measurement.  The inputs included assumptions related to the future performance of the Company’s contract drilling and pressure pumping reporting units, such as future oil and natural gas prices and projected demand for the Company’s services, and assumptions related to discount rates, long-term growth rates and control premiums.

 

Based on the results of the first step of the goodwill impairment test as of September 30, 2015, management concluded that no impairment was indicated in its contract drilling reporting unit; however, impairment was indicated in its pressure pumping reporting unit.  In the three months ended September 30, 2015, the Company recognized an impairment charge of $125 million associated with the impairment of the goodwill of the pressure pumping reporting unit.   The implied fair value of goodwill was estimated using a variety of valuation methods, including the income and market approaches.  The estimate of fair value required the use of significant unobservable inputs, representative of a Level 3 fair value measurement. The inputs included assumptions related to the future performance of the Company’s pressure pumping reporting unit, such as future oil and natural gas prices and projected demand for the Company’s services, and assumptions related to discount rates, long-term growth rates and control premiums.  

Intangible Assets — Intangible assets were recorded in the pressure pumping operating segment in connection with the fourth quarter 2010 acquisition of the assets of a pressure pumping business. As a result of the purchase price allocation, the Company recorded an intangible asset related to the customer relationships acquired. The intangible asset was recorded at fair value on the date of acquisition.

The value of the customer relationships was estimated using a multi-period excess earnings model to determine the present value of the projected cash flows associated with the customers in place at the time of the acquisition and taking into account a contributory asset charge. The resulting intangible asset is being amortized on a straight-line basis over seven years. Amortization expense of approximately $911,000 was recorded in the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, and amortization expense of approximately $2.7 million was recorded in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 associated with customer relationships.  The assessment of the recoverability of the pressure pumping asset group included the customer relationship intangible asset and no impairment was indicated.

The following table presents the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of the customer relationships as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (in thousands):

 

 

September 30, 2015

 

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

Gross

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net

 

 

Gross

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net

 

 

Carrying

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Carrying

 

 

Carrying

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Carrying

 

 

Amount

 

 

Amortization

 

 

Amount

 

 

Amount

 

 

Amortization

 

 

Amount

 

Customer relationships

$

25,500

 

 

$

(18,214

)

 

$

7,286

 

 

$

25,500

 

 

$

(15,482

)

 

$

10,018