XML 29 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2017
Goodwill And Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Intangible Assets

5. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill — Goodwill by operating segment as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 and changes for the years then ended are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

Contract

 

 

Pressure

 

 

Directional

 

 

Oilfield

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Drilling

 

 

Pumping

 

 

Drilling

 

 

Rental

 

 

Total

 

Balance December 31, 2015 and 2016

 

$

86,234

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

86,234

 

Goodwill acquired

 

 

308,826

 

 

 

121,444

 

 

 

88,685

 

 

 

6,284

 

 

 

525,239

 

Balance December 31, 2017

 

$

395,060

 

 

$

121,444

 

 

$

88,685

 

 

$

6,284

 

 

$

611,473

 

 

There were no accumulated impairment losses related to goodwill as of December 31, 2017 or 2016.  

Goodwill is evaluated at least annually as of December 31, or when circumstances require, to determine if the fair value of recorded goodwill has decreased below its carrying value.  For purposes of impairment testing, goodwill is evaluated at the reporting unit level.  The Company’s reporting units for impairment testing have been determined to be its operating segments.  The Company determines whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value after considering qualitative, market and other factors, and if this is the case, any necessary goodwill impairment is determined using a quantitative impairment test.  From time to time, the Company may perform quantitative testing for goodwill impairment in lieu of performing the qualitative assessment.  If this resulting fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying value of goodwill, an impairment loss would be recognized in the amount of such shortfall.

In January 2017, the FASB issued an accounting standards update to eliminate Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test.  An entity will now perform its annual or interim goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount.  An entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, but the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.  The Company adopted this update in 2017. Prior to adoption the Company first determined whether it was more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit was less than its carrying value after considering qualitative, market and other factors, and if so, the resulting goodwill impairment was determined using a two-step quantitative impairment test.  The first step of the quantitative testing was to compare the fair value of an entity’s reporting units to the respective carrying value of those reporting units.  If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeded its fair value, the second step of the quantitative testing was performed whereby the fair value of the reporting unit was allocated to its identifiable tangible and intangible assets and liabilities, with any remaining fair value representing the fair value of goodwill.  If this resulting fair value of goodwill was less than the carrying value of goodwill, an impairment loss was recognized in the amount of such shortfall.

In connection with its annual goodwill impairment assessment as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company determined based on an assessment of qualitative factors that it was more likely than not that the fair values of its reporting units were greater than the respective carrying amount.  In making this determination, the Company considered the current and expected levels of commodity prices for oil and natural gas, which influence the overall level of business activity in its reporting units, as well as the Company’s operating results for 2017 and 2016 and forecasted operating results for the respective succeeding year.  Management also considered the Company’s overall market capitalization at December 31, 2017 and 2016.

During the third quarter of 2015, oil prices declined and averaged $46.42 per barrel, reaching a new low for 2015 of $38.22 per barrel in August 2015.  In light of these lower oil prices in August, the Company lowered its expectations with respect to future activity levels in both the contract drilling and pressure pumping businesses.  As a result of the Company’s revised expectations of the duration of the lower oil and natural gas commodity price environment and the related deterioration of the markets for its contract drilling and pressure pumping services, the Company performed a quantitative Step 1 impairment assessment of its goodwill as of September 30, 2015.  In completing the Step 1 assessment, the fair value of each reporting unit was estimated using both the income and market valuation methods.  The estimate of fair value for each reporting unit required the use of significant unobservable inputs, representative of a Level 3 fair value measurement.  The inputs included assumptions related to the future performance of the Company’s contract drilling and pressure pumping reporting units, such as future oil and natural gas prices and projected demand for the Company’s services, and assumptions related to discount rates, long-term growth rates and control premiums.

Based on the results of the Step 1 goodwill impairment test as of September 30, 2015, the fair value of the contract drilling reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by approximately 15%, and management concluded that no impairment was indicated in its contract drilling reporting unit; however, impairment was indicated in its pressure pumping reporting unit.  In the third quarter of 2015, the Company recognized an impairment charge of $125 million associated with the impairment of all of the goodwill in its pressure pumping reporting unit.     

In connection with its annual impairment asset at December 31, 2015, the Company performed a quantitative Step 1 impairment assessment of the goodwill in its contract drilling reporting unit.  In completing the Step 1 assessment, the fair value of the contract drilling reporting unit was estimated using both the income and market valuation methods.  The estimate of the fair value of the reporting unit required the use of significant unobservable inputs, representative of a Level 3 fair value measurement.  The inputs included assumptions related to the future performance of the Company’s contract drilling reporting unit, such as future oil and natural gas prices and projected demand for the Company’s services, and assumptions related to discount rates, long-term growth rates and control premiums.  Based on the results of the quantitative Step 1 impairment assessment of its goodwill as of December 31, 2015, the fair value of the contract drilling reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by approximately 16%, and management concluded that no impairment was indicated in its contract drilling reporting unit.

Intangible Assets — In 2017, intangible assets were recorded in the Company’s directional drilling operating segment with the acquisition of MS Directional and in the contract drilling operating segment with the SSE merger (See Note 2).  In addition, intangible assets were recorded in the pressure pumping operating segment in connection with the 2010 acquisition of the assets of a pressure pumping business.  The Company’s intangible assets were recorded at fair value on the date of acquisition and are amortized on a straight line basis.  The following table identifies the segment and weighted average useful life of each of the Company’s intangible assets:

 

 

 

 

Weighted Average

 

 

Segment

 

Useful Life

 

 

 

 

(in years)

Customer relationships

 

Pressure pumping

 

7.00

Customer relationships

 

Directional drilling

 

3.00

Developed technology

 

Directional drilling

 

10.00

Favorable drilling contracts

 

Contract drilling

 

0.83

Internal use software

 

Directional drilling

 

5.00

 

The Company concluded that no triggering events necessitating an impairment assessment of the intangible assets had occurred in 2017, 2016 or 2015.  The assessment of the recoverability of the respective operating segments asset group included the respective intangible assets, and no impairment was indicated.

The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of intangible assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

Gross Carrying

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Net Carrying

 

 

Gross Carrying

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Net Carrying

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

Amortization

 

 

Amount

 

 

Amount

 

 

Amortization

 

 

Amount

 

Customer relationships

 

$

26,200

 

 

$

(1,943

)

 

$

24,257

 

 

$

25,500

 

 

$

(22,768

)

 

$

2,732

 

Developed technology

 

 

48,000

 

 

 

(1,137

)

 

 

46,863

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Favorable drilling contracts

 

 

22,500

 

 

 

(18,482

)

 

 

4,018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Internal use software

 

 

482

 

 

 

(21

)

 

 

461

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

97,182

 

 

$

(21,583

)

 

$

75,599

 

 

$

25,500

 

 

$

(22,768

)

 

$

2,732

 

 

Amortization expense on intangible assets of approximately $24.3 million, $3.6 million and $3.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.  The remaining amortization expense associated with finite-lived intangible assets is expected to be as follows (in thousands):

Year ending December 31,

 

 

 

 

2018

 

$

17,580

 

2019

 

 

13,630

 

2020

 

 

11,686

 

2021

 

 

4,896

 

2022

 

 

4,875

 

Thereafter

 

 

22,932

 

Total

 

$

75,599