XML 30 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.20.2

Fair Value Measurements (Notes) | 6 Months Ended
--- | ---
Jun. 30, 2020
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract] |
Fair Value Measurements | Fair Value Measurements Topic 820 established a framework for measuring fair value. That framework provides a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under Topic 820 are described below:
Level 1: | Inputs to the valuation methodology are unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the Company has the ability to access.
Level 2: | Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted market prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.
Level 3: | Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
An asset’s or liability’s fair value measurement level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Valuation techniques used need to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis Methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 are based on limited unobservable inputs. These methods may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of the net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while the Company believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date. The following table summarizes the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis within each level of the fair value hierarchy:
(in thousands) |  | June 30, 2020 |  | December 31, 2019
Level 3 |  |  |  |
Contingently returnable consideration |  | $ | 387 |  |  | $ | 70 |
Level 3 Assets |  | $ | 387 |  |  | $ | 70 |
Contingent earnout liabilities |  | $ | 78,535 |  |  | $ | 48,769 |
Level 3 Liabilities |  | $ | 78,535 |  |  | $ | 48,769 |
The Company’s contingently returnable consideration at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 represents a contingent right of return from a Partner to reimburse the Company for a portion of the purchase price as part of the Partnership transaction. The fair value of the contingently returnable consideration is based on sales projections for the acquired entity, which are reassessed each reporting period. Based on the Company’s ongoing assessment of the fair value of contingently returnable consideration, the Company recorded a net increase in the estimated fair value of such asset of $317,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2020. The Company has assessed the maximum refund relating to the contingently returnable consideration to be $1.3 million at June 30, 2020. The fair value of contingent earnout liabilities is based on sales projections for the acquired entities, which are reassessed each reporting period. Based on the Company’s ongoing assessment of the fair value of contingent earnout liability, the Company recorded a net increase in the estimated fair value of such liabilities of $6.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020. The Company has assessed the maximum estimated exposure to the contingent earnout liabilities to be $227.3 million at June 30, 2020. The Company measures contingently returnable consideration and contingent earnout liabilities at fair value at each reporting period using significant unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The Company uses a probability weighted value analysis as a valuation technique to convert future estimated cash flows to a single present value amount. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements are sales projections over the earnout period, and the probability outcome percentages assigned to each scenario. Significant increases or decreases to either of these inputs would result in a significantly higher or lower asset or liability with a higher asset capped by the contractual maximum of the contingently returnable consideration and a higher liability capped by the contractual maximum of the contingent earnout liabilities. Ultimately, the asset and liability will be equivalent to the amount settled, and the difference between the fair value estimate and amount settled will be recorded in earnings for business combinations, or as a reduction of the cost of the assets acquired for asset acquisitions. Refer to Note 3 for additional information regarding contingently returnable consideration and contingent earnout consideration recorded in connection with business acquisitions. The fair value of the contingent earnout liabilities is based on the present value of the expected future payments to be made to Partners in accordance with the provisions outlined in the respective purchase agreements, which is a Level 3 fair value measurement. In determining fair value, the Company estimates the Partner’s future performance using financial projections developed by management for the Partner and market participant assumptions that were derived for revenue growth or profitability based on earnings before income taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”). Revenue and EBITDA growth rates generally ranged from 10% to 20%. The Company estimates future payments using the earnout formula and performance targets specified in each purchase agreement and these financial projections. These payments are discounted to present value using a risk-adjusted rate that takes into consideration market-based rates of return that reflect the ability of the Partner to achieve the targets. These discount rates generally ranged from 6.50% to 18.00%. Changes in financial projections, market participant assumptions for revenue growth and profitability, or the risk-adjusted discount rate, would result in a change in the fair value of contingent consideration. The following table sets forth a summary of the changes in the fair value of the Company’s contingently returnable consideration and contingent earnout liabilities, which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis utilizing Level 3 assumptions in their valuation:
|  | For the Three Months Ended June 30, |  | For the Six Months Ended June 30,
|  | 2020 |  | 2019 |  | 2020 |  | 2019
(in thousands) |  | Contingently Returnable Consideration |  | Contingent Earnout Liabilities |  | Contingent Earnout Liabilities |  | Contingently Returnable Consideration |  | Contingent Earnout Liabilities |  | Contingent Earnout Liabilities
Balance at beginning of period |  | $ | 258 |  |  | $ | 53,855 |  |  | $ | 6,463 |  |  | $ | 70 |  |  | $ | 48,769 |  |  | $ | 9,249 |
Fair value of contingent consideration issuances |  | — |  |  | 21,951 |  |  | 25,619 |  |  | — |  |  | 25,188 |  |  | 25,619 |
Change in fair value of contingent consideration |  | 129 |  |  | 4,710 |  |  | (971 | ) |  | 317 |  |  | 6,559 |  |  | (3,757 | )
Payment of contingent consideration |  | — |  |  | (1,981 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (1,981 | ) |  | — |
Balance at end of period |  | $ | 387 |  |  | $ | 78,535 |  |  | $ | 31,111 |  |  | $ | 387 |  |  | $ | 78,535 |  |  | $ | 31,111 |
The change in fair value of contingent consideration during the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 related entirely to assets and liabilities that were held at the end of the respective periods. Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments The fair value of the Revolving Credit Commitment is classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy. Fair value is based on an estimate using a discounted cash flow analysis based on current borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. The fair value of the Revolving Credit Commitment was approximately $220.9 million at June 30, 2020 compared to a carrying value of $226.0 million. The carrying amount of the Revolving Credit Commitment of $40.4 million approximated fair value at December 31, 2019 as a result of the JPMorgan Credit Agreement having been amended and restated at market terms on December 19, 2019.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_FairValueDisclosuresAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for the fair value of financial instruments (as defined), including financial assets and financial liabilities (collectively, as defined), and the measurements of those instruments as well as disclosures related to the fair value of non-financial assets and liabilities. Such disclosures about the financial instruments, assets, and liabilities would include: (1) the fair value of the required items together with their carrying amounts (as appropriate); (2) for items for which it is not practicable to estimate fair value, disclosure would include: (a) information pertinent to estimating fair value (including, carrying amount, effective interest rate, and maturity, and (b) the reasons why it is not practicable to estimate fair value; (3) significant concentrations of credit risk including: (a) information about the activity, region, or economic characteristics identifying a concentration, (b) the maximum amount of loss the entity is exposed to based on the gross fair value of the related item, (c) policy for requiring collateral or other security and information as to accessing such collateral or security, and (d) the nature and brief description of such collateral or security; (4) quantitative information about market risks and how such risks are managed; (5) for items measured on both a recurring and nonrecurring basis information regarding the inputs used to develop the fair value measurement; and (6) for items presented in the financial statement for which fair value measurement is elected: (a) information necessary to understand the reasons for the election, (b) discussion of the effect of fair value changes on earnings, (c) a description of [similar groups] items for which the election is made and the relation thereof to the balance sheet, the aggregate carrying value of items included in the balance sheet that are not eligible for the election; (7) all other required (as defined) and desired information. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 820 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=117815213&loc=d3e19207-110258 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_FairValueDisclosuresTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration