XML 44 R29.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2017
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Nature Of Business

Nature of Business



CryoLife, Inc. (“CryoLife,” the “Company,” “we,” or “us”), incorporated in 1984 in Florida, is a leader in the manufacturing, processing, and distribution of medical devices and implantable human tissues used in cardiac and vascular surgical procedures focused on aortic repair.  Our medical devices and processed tissues primarily include four product families:   BioGlue® Surgical Adhesive (“BioGlue”); On-X mechanical heart valves and surgical products; JOTEC endovascular and surgical products; and cardiac and vascular human tissues including the CryoValve® SG pulmonary heart valve (“CryoValve SGPV”) and the CryoPatch® SG pulmonary cardiac patch (“CryoPatch SG”), both of which are processed using our proprietary SynerGraft® technology.

Principles Of Consolidation

Principles of Consolidation



The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and our wholly owned subsidiaries.  All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Translation Of Foreign Currencies

Translation of Foreign Currencies



Our revenues and expenses transacted in foreign currencies are translated as they occur at exchange rates in effect at the time of each transaction.  Realized gains and losses on foreign currency transactions are recorded as a component of other (income) expense, net on our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.  Our assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the exchange rate in effect as of the balance sheet date and are recorded as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the shareholders' equity section of our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Use Of Estimates

Use of Estimates



The preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.  Estimates and assumptions are used when accounting for investments, allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory, deferred preservation costs, acquired assets or businesses, long‑lived tangible and intangible assets, deferred income taxes, commitments and contingencies (including product and tissue processing liability claims, claims incurred but not reported, and amounts recoverable from insurance companies), stock-based compensation, certain accrued liabilities (including accrued procurement fees, income taxes, and financial instruments), contingent consideration liability, and other items as appropriate.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue Recognition



Revenues for products, including: BioGlue, On-X products, JOTEC products, CardioGenesis cardiac laser therapy, PerClot®, PhotoFix TM and other medical devices, are typically recognized at the time the product is shipped, at which time title passes to the customer, and there are no further performance obligations.  Revenues from consignment are recognized when the medical device is implanted.  We recognize revenues for preservation services when services are completed and tissue is shipped to the customer.  Revenues from upfront licensing agreements are recognized ratably over the period we expect to fulfill our obligations.



Revenues from the sale of laser consoles are considered multiple element arrangements, and such revenues are allocated to the elements of the sale.  We allocate revenues based primarily on the revenue these individual elements would generate if sold separately.  Revenues from the sales of domestic laser consoles are typically recognized when the laser is installed at a customer site and all materials for the laser console’s use are delivered.  Revenues from the sales of laser consoles to international distributors are evaluated individually based on the terms of the sale and collectability to determine when revenue has been earned and can be recognized.



Shipping And Handling Charges

Shipping and Handling Charges



Fees charged to customers for shipping and handling of products and tissues are included in product revenues and preservation services revenues, respectively.  The costs for shipping and handling of products and tissues are included as a component of cost of products and cost of preservation services, respectively.

Advertising Costs

Advertising Costs



The costs to develop, produce, and communicate our advertising are expensed as incurred and are classified as general, administrative, and marketing expenses.  We record the cost to print or copy certain sales materials as a prepaid expense and amortize these costs as an advertising expense over the period they are expected to be used, typically six months to one year.  The total amount of advertising expense included in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income was $606,000,  $384,000, and $521,000 for the years ended December 31, 2017,  2016, and 2015, respectively.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock‑Based Compensation



We have stock option and stock incentive plans for employees and non-employee Directors that provide for grants of restricted stock awards (“RSA”s), performance stock awards (“PSA”s), restricted stock units (“RSU”s), performance stock units (“PSU”s), and options to purchase shares of our common stock at exercise prices generally equal to the fair values of such stock at the dates of grant.  We also maintain a shareholder approved Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”) for the benefit of our employees.  The ESPP allows eligible employees the right to purchase common stock on a regular basis at the lower of 85% of the market price at the beginning or end of each offering period.  The RSAs, PSAs, RSUs, PSUs, and stock options granted by us typically vest over a one to three-year period.  The stock options granted by us typically expire within seven years of the grant date.



We value our RSAs, PSAs, RSUs, and PSUs based on the stock price on the date of grant.  We expense the related compensation cost of RSAs, PSAs, and RSUs using the straight-line method over the vesting period.  We expense the related compensation cost of PSUs based on the number of shares expected to be issued, if achievement of the performance component is probable, using a straight-line method over each vesting tranche of the award.  The amount of compensation costs expensed related to PSUs is adjusted as needed if we deem that achievement of the performance component is no longer probable, or if our expectation of the number of shares to be issued changes.  We use a Black-Scholes model to value our stock option grants and expense the related compensation cost using the straight-line method over the vesting period.  The fair value of our ESPP options is also determined using a Black-Scholes model and is expensed over the vesting period. 



The fair value of stock options and ESPP options is determined on the grant date using assumptions for the expected term, volatility, dividend yield, and the risk-free interest rate.  The expected term is primarily based on the contractual term of the option and our data related to historic exercise and post-vesting forfeiture patterns, which is adjusted based on our expectations of future results.  Our anticipated volatility level is primarily based on the historic volatility of our common stock, adjusted to remove the effects of certain periods of unusual volatility not expected to recur, and adjusted based on our expectations of future volatility, for the life of the option or option group.  Our model was updated to include a zero dividend yield assumption when our quarterly dividends were discontinued after the fourth quarter of 2015.  The risk-free interest rate is based on recent U.S. Treasury note auction results with a similar life to that of the option.  Our model does not include a discount for post-vesting restrictions, as we have not issued awards with such restrictions.



The period expense for our stock compensation is determined based on the valuations discussed above and forfeitures are accounted for in the period awards are forfeited.



Change in Accounting for Employee Share-Based Payments



As of January 1, 2017 we made an entity-wide accounting policy election in accordance with ASU 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, (“ASU 2016-09”) to change our accounting policy to account for stock compensation forfeitures in the period awards are forfeited rather than estimating the effect of forfeitures.  We elected to make this accounting policy change to simplify the accounting for share-based compensation and believe this method provides a more accurate reflection of periodic share-based compensation cost from the grant date forward.  We used the modified retrospective transition method to record a net $238,000 cumulative-effect adjustment decrease to retained earnings for the accounting policy change, which included a $379,000 increase to additional paid-in capital and a $141,000 increase in deferred tax assets. 



Additionally, as of January 1, 2017 and in accordance with the guidance in ASU 2016-09, we made a change to account for excess tax benefits and deficiencies resulting from the settlement or vesting of share-based awards in income tax expense on our Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income instead of accounting for these effects through additional paid in-capital on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.  We applied this amendment prospectively and prior periods have not been adjusted.

Income Per Common Share

Income Per Common Share



Income per common share is computed using the two class method, which requires us to include unvested RSAs and PSAs that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends (whether paid or unpaid) as participating securities in the income per common share calculation. 



Under the two class method, net income is allocated to the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period and the weighted-average participating securities outstanding during the period.  The portion of net income that is allocated to the participating securities is excluded from basic and dilutive net income per common share.  Diluted net income per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding plus the dilutive effects of outstanding stock options and awards and other dilutive instruments as appropriate.

Dividends

Dividends

 

Cash dividends approved by our Board of Directors were paid every three months in the amount of $0.03 per share in 2015.  In December 2015 the Board of Directors undertook a review of our dividend policy and determined that it would be in the best interest of the shareholders to discontinue dividend payments for the foreseeable future.  We did not pay quarterly dividends in 2016 or 2017 and do not currently anticipate paying out further quarterly dividends.

Financial Instruments

Financial Instruments



Our financial instruments include cash equivalents, marketable securities, restricted securities, accounts receivable, notes receivable, accounts payable, debt obligations, contingent consideration, and derivatives.  We typically value financial assets and liabilities such as receivables, accounts payable, and debt obligations at their carrying values, which approximate fair value due to their generally short-term duration.  Other financial instruments are recorded as discussed in the sections below.



Fair Value Measurements

Fair Value Measurements



We record certain financial instruments at fair value, including: cash equivalents, certain marketable securities, certain restricted securities, contingent consideration, and derivative instruments.  We may make an irrevocable election to measure other financial instruments at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis, although as of December 31, 2017 we have not chosen to make any such elections.  Fair value financial instruments are recorded in accordance with the fair value measurement framework.



We also measure certain non-financial assets at fair value on a non-recurring basis.  These non-recurring valuations include evaluating assets such as cost method investments, long‑lived assets, and non-amortizing intangible assets for impairment; allocating value to assets in an acquired asset group; applying accounting for business combinations; and allocating goodwill to divested components of a business.  We use the fair value measurement framework to value these assets and report these fair values in the periods in which they are recorded or written down.  



The fair value measurement framework includes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair values in their broad levels.  These levels from highest to lowest priority are as follows:



·

Level 1:  Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities;

·

Level 2:  Quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities or observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data; and

·

Level 3:  Unobservable inputs or valuation techniques that are used when little or no market data is available.

 

The determination of fair value and the assessment of a measurement’s placement within the hierarchy requires judgment.  Level 3 valuations often involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity.  Level 3 valuations may require the use of various cost, market, or income valuation methodologies applied to our unobservable estimates and assumptions.  Our assumptions could vary depending on the asset or liability valued and the valuation method used.  Such assumptions could include: estimates of prices, earnings, costs, actions of market participants, market factors, or the weighting of various valuation methods.  We may also engage external advisors to assist in determining fair value, as appropriate.



Although we believe that the recorded fair values of our financial instruments are appropriate, these fair values may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values.

Cash And Cash Equivalents

Cash and Cash Equivalents



Cash equivalents consist primarily of highly liquid investments with maturity dates of three months or less at the time of acquisition.  The carrying value of cash equivalents approximates fair value.  We maintain depository accounts with certain financial institutions.  Although these depository accounts may exceed government insured depository limits, we have evaluated the credit worthiness of these applicable financial institutions, and determined the risk of material financial loss due to the exposure of such credit risk to be minimal.

Cash Flow Supplemental Disclosures

Cash Flow Supplemental Disclosures



Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



2017

 

2016

 

2015

Cash paid during the year for:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

$

2,561 

 

$

2,446 

 

$

Income taxes

 

3,358 

 

 

2,501 

 

 

145 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-cash investing and financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock for acquisition of JOTEC intangible assets

$

53,119 

 

$

--

 

$

--

Issuance of common stock for acquisition of On-X intangible assets

 

--

 

 

34,593 

 

 

--



Marketable Securities And Other Investments

Marketable Securities and Other Investments



We typically invest our excess cash for short-term periods in large, well‑capitalized financial institutions, and our policy excludes investment in any securities rated less than "investment‑grade" by national rating services, unless specifically approved by the Board of Directors.  We sometimes make longer term strategic investments in medical device companies, and these investments must be approved by the Board of Directors.



We determine the classification of our investments as trading, available-for-sale, or held-to-maturity at the time of purchase and reevaluate such designations quarterly.  Trading securities are securities that are acquired principally for the purpose of generating a profit from short-term fluctuations in price.  Debt securities are classified as held‑to‑maturity when we have the intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity.  Any securities not designated as trading or held‑to‑maturity are considered available-for-sale.  We typically state our investments at their fair values; however, for held‑to‑maturity securities or when current fair value information is not readily available, investments are recorded using the cost method.  The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method.



Under the fair value method, we adjust each investment to its market price and record the unrealized gains or losses in other (income) expense, net for trading securities, or accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), for available-for-sale securities.  Interest, dividends, realized gains and losses, and declines in value judged to be other than temporary are included in other (income) expense, net.  Under the cost method, investments are recorded at cost, with subsequent dividends received recognized as income.  Cost method investments are reviewed for impairment if factors indicate that a decrease in the value of the investment has occurred.



We review our contracts to determine if they require any restrictions to cash or investments.  If there is a contractual agreement restricting the availability of our cash or investments, we will classify these amounts as current or long-term restricted cash or investments.

Accounts And Notes Receivable And Allowance For Doubtful Accounts

Accounts and Notes Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts



Our accounts receivable are primarily from hospitals and distributors that either use or distribute our products and tissues.  We assess the likelihood of collection based on a number of factors, including past transaction history and the credit worthiness of the customer, as well as the increased risks related to international customers and large distributors.  We determine the allowance for doubtful accounts based upon specific reserves for known collection issues, as well as a non-specific reserve based upon aging buckets.  We charge off uncollectable amounts against the reserve in the period in which we determine they are uncollectible.  Our accounts receivable balances are reported net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $697,000 and $503,000 as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.



We may lend money from time-to-time through a note receivable, which may be made in conjunction with a longer term strategic investment in a medical device company, as approved by the Board of Directors.  We assess the likelihood of collection of our notes receivable based on a number of factors, including past transaction history, credit worthiness, and the liquidity position of the recipient as well as the expected value of any collateral.  Our notes receivable balance was zero as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively

Inventories

Inventories



Inventories are comprised of finished goods for our major product lines including:  BioGlue; On-X products; JOTEC products; CardioGenesis cardiac laser therapy laser consoles, handpieces, and accessories; PerClot; PhotoFix; other medical devices; work-in-process; and raw materials.  Inventories for finished goods are valued at the lower of cost or market on a first‑in, first‑out basis and raw materials are valued on a moving average cost basis.  Typically, upon shipment, or upon implant of a medical device on consignment, revenue is recognized and the related inventory costs are expensed as cost of products.  Cost of products also includes, as applicable, lower of cost or market write-downs and impairments for products not deemed to be recoverable and, as incurred, idle facility expense, excessive spoilage, extra freight, and rehandling costs.



Inventory costs for manufactured products consist primarily of direct labor and materials (including salary and fringe benefits, raw materials, and supplies) and indirect costs (including allocations of costs from departments that support manufacturing activities and facility allocations).  The allocation of fixed production overhead costs is based on actual production levels, to the extent that they are within the range of the facility’s normal capacity.  Inventory costs for products purchased for resale or manufactured under contract consist primarily of the purchase cost, freight-in charges, and indirect costs as appropriate.



We regularly evaluate our inventory to determine if the costs are appropriately recorded at the lower of cost or market value. We also evaluate our inventory for costs not deemed to be recoverable, including inventory not expected to ship prior to its expiration.  Lower of cost or market value write-downs are recorded if the book value exceeds the estimated net realizable value of the inventory, based on recent sales prices at the time of the evaluation.  Impairment write-downs are recorded based on the book value of inventory deemed to be impaired.  Actual results may differ from these estimates.  Write-downs of inventory are expensed as cost of products, and these write-downs are permanent impairments that create a new cost basis, which cannot be restored to its previous levels if our estimates change.



We recorded write-downs to our inventory totaling $1.2 million, $467,000, and $858,000 for the years ended December 31, 2017,  2016, and 2015, respectively.  The 2017 write-down is primarily related to the write-down of our On-X ascending aortic prosthesis (“AAP”) as a result of inventory not expected to ship prior to the expiration date of the packaging and continued delay in obtaining European re-certification.  The 2016 write-down is primarily related to the write-down of PerClot inventory as a result of inventory not expected to ship prior to the expiration date.  The 2015 write-down is primarily related to the write-down of PerClot Topical inventory following our cessation of marketing, sales, and distribution of PerClot Topical in the U.S.  See Note 8 for further discussion of PerClot Topical.

Deferred Preservation Costs

Deferred Preservation Costs



Deferred preservation costs includes costs of cardiac and vascular tissues available for shipment, tissues currently in active processing, and tissues held in quarantine pending release to implantable status.  By federal law, human tissues cannot be bought or sold; therefore, the tissues we preserve are not held as inventory.  The costs we incur to procure and process cardiac and vascular tissues are instead accumulated and deferred.  Deferred preservation costs are stated at the lower of cost or market value on a first‑in, first‑out basis and are deferred until revenue is recognized.  Upon shipment of tissue to an implanting facility, revenue is recognized and the related deferred preservation costs are expensed as cost of preservation services.  Cost of preservation services also includes, as applicable, lower of cost or market write-downs and impairments for tissues not deemed to be recoverable, and includes, as incurred, idle facility expense, excessive spoilage, extra freight, and rehandling costs.



The calculation of deferred preservation costs involves judgment and complexity and uses the same principles as inventory costing.  Donated human tissue is procured from deceased human donors by organ and tissue procurement organizations (“OTPOs”), which consign the tissue to us for processing, preservation, and distribution.  Deferred preservation costs consist primarily of the procurement fees charged by the OTPOs, direct labor and materials (including salary and fringe benefits, laboratory supplies and expenses, and freight‑in charges), and indirect costs (including allocations of costs from support departments and facility allocations).  Fixed production overhead costs are allocated based on actual tissue processing levels, to the extent that they are within the range of the facility’s normal capacity. 



These costs are then allocated among the tissues processed during the period based on cost drivers, such as the number of donors or number of tissues processed.  We apply a yield estimate to all tissues in process and in quarantine to estimate the portion of tissues that will ultimately become implantable.  We estimate quarantine yields based on our experience and reevaluate these estimates periodically.  Actual yields could differ significantly from our estimates, which could result in a change in tissues available for shipment, and could increase or decrease the balance of deferred preservation costs.  These changes could result in additional cost of preservation services expense or could increase per tissue preservation costs, which would impact gross margins on tissue preservation services in future periods. 



We regularly evaluate our deferred preservation costs to determine if the costs are appropriately recorded at the lower of cost or market value.  We also evaluate our deferred preservation costs for costs not deemed to be recoverable, including tissues not expected to ship prior to the expiration date of their packaging.  Lower of cost or market value write-downs are recorded if the tissue processing costs incurred exceed the estimated market value of the tissue services, based on recent average service fees at the time of the evaluation.  Impairment write-downs are recorded based on the book value of tissues deemed to be impaired.  Actual results may differ from these estimates.  Write-downs of deferred preservation costs are expensed as cost of preservation services, and these write-downs are permanent impairments that create a new cost basis, which cannot be restored to its previous levels if our estimates change.



We recorded write-downs to our deferred preservation costs totaling $922,000,  $897,000, and $483,000 for the years ended December 31, 2017,  2016, and 2015, respectively, due primarily to tissues not expected to ship prior to the expiration date of the packaging.

Property And Equipment

Property and Equipment



Property and equipment is stated at cost.  Depreciation is provided over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally three to ten years, on a straight‑line basis.  Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight‑line basis over the remaining lease term at the time the assets are capitalized or the estimated useful lives of the assets, whichever is shorter.



Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31 is as follows (in thousands):



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



2017

 

2016

 

2015

Depreciation expense

$

4,648 

 

$

3,958 

 

$

3,728 



Goodwill And Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets



Our intangible assets consist of goodwill, patents, trademarks, and other intangible assets, as discussed in Note 11.  Our goodwill is attributable to a segment or segments of our business, as appropriate, as the related acquired business that generated the goodwill is integrated into our operations.  Upon divestiture of a component of our business, the goodwill related to the operating segment is allocated to the divested business using the relative fair value allocation method.



We amortize our definite lived intangible assets over their expected useful lives using the straight-line method, which we believe approximates the period of economic benefits of the related assets.  Our indefinite lived intangible assets do not amortize, but are instead subject to periodic impairment testing as discussed in “Impairments of Long-Lived Assets and Non-Amortizing Intangible Assets” below.

Impairments Of Long-Lived Assets And Non-Amortizing Intangible Assets

Impairments of Long‑Lived Assets and Non-Amortizing Intangible Assets



We assess the potential impairment of our long-lived assets to be held and used whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.  Factors that could trigger an impairment review include, but are not limited to, the following:



·

Significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results;

·

Significant negative industry or economic trends;

·

Significant decline in our stock price for a sustained period; or

·

Significant decline in our market capitalization relative to net book value. 



If we determine that an impairment review is necessary, we will evaluate the assets or asset groups by comparing their carrying values to the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from their use and eventual disposition.  If the carrying values exceed the future cash flows, then the asset or asset group is considered impaired, and we will write down the value of the asset or asset group.  For the years ended December 31, 2017,  2016, and 2015 we did not experience any factors that indicated that an impairment review of our long-lived assets was warranted.



We evaluate our goodwill and other non-amortizing intangible assets for impairment on an annual basis as of October 31 and, if necessary, during interim periods if factors indicate that an impairment review is warranted.  As of October 31, 2017 our non-amortizing intangible assets consisted of goodwill, acquired procurement contracts and agreements, trademarks, and other acquired technology.  We performed an analysis of our non-amortizing intangible assets as of October 31, 2017 and 2016, and determined that the fair value of the assets and the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded their associated carrying values and were, therefore, not impaired.  We will continue to evaluate the recoverability of these non-amortizing intangible assets.

Accrued Procurement Fees

Accrued Procurement Fees



Donated tissue is procured from deceased human donors by OTPOs, which consign the tissue to us for processing, preservation, and distribution.  We reimburse the OTPOs for their costs to recover the tissue and include these costs as part of deferred preservation costs, as discussed above.  We accrue estimated procurement fees due to the OTPOs at the time tissues are received based on contractual agreements between us and the OTPOs.



Leases

Leases



We have operating and capital lease obligations resulting from the lease of land and buildings that comprise our corporate headquarters and various manufacturing facilities; leases related to additional manufacturing, office, and warehouse space; leases on Company vehicles; and leases on a variety of office and other equipment, as discussed in Note 14.  Certain of our leases contain escalation clauses, rent concessions, and renewal options for additional periods.  Rent expense is computed on the straight‑line method over the lease term and the related liability is recorded as deferred rent obligations on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Debt Issuance Costs

Debt Issuance Costs



Debt issuance costs related to our term loan and line of credit are capitalized and reported net of the current and long-term debt or as a prepaid asset when there are no outstanding borrowings.  If there is unamortized debt issuance costs related to our line of credit but only borrowings on the term loan, these debt issuance costs will be combined with the debt issuance costs related to the term loan and reported net of the current and long-term debt for the term loan.  We amortize debt issuance costs to interest expense on our term loan using the effective interest method over the life of the debt agreement.  We amortize debt issuance costs to interest expense on our line of credit on a straight-line basis over the life of the debt agreement.

Liability Claims

Liability Claims



In the normal course of business, we are made aware of adverse events involving our products and tissues.  Future adverse events could ultimately give rise to a lawsuit against us, and liability claims may be asserted against us in the future based on past events we are not aware of at the present time.  We maintain claims‑made insurance policies to mitigate our financial exposure to product and tissue processing liability claims.  Claims‑made insurance policies generally cover only those asserted claims and incidents that are reported to the insurance carrier while the policy is in effect.  Thus, a claims‑made policy does not generally represent a transfer of risk for claims and incidents that have been incurred but not reported to the insurance carrier during the policy period.  Any punitive damage components of claims are uninsured.



We engage external advisors to assist us in estimating our liability and any related amount recoverable under our insurance policies as of each balance sheet date.  We use a frequency‑severity approach to estimate our unreported product and tissue processing liability claims, whereby projected losses are calculated by multiplying the estimated number of claims by the estimated average cost per claim.  The estimated claims are determined based on the reported claim development method and the Bornhuetter‑Ferguson method using a blend of our historical claim experience and industry data.  The estimated cost per claim is calculated using a lognormal claims model blending our historical average cost per claim with industry claims data.  We use a number of assumptions in order to estimate the unreported loss liability including: the future claim reporting time lag, the frequency of reported claims, the average cost per claim, and the maximum liability per claim.  We believe that the assumptions we use provide a reasonable basis for our calculation.  However, the accuracy of the estimates is limited by various factors, including, but not limited to, our specific conditions, uncertainties surrounding the assumptions used, and the scarcity of industry data directly relevant to our business activities.  Due to these factors, actual results may differ significantly from our assumptions and from the amounts accrued.



We accrue our estimate of unreported product and tissue processing liability claims as a component of other long‑term liabilities and record the related recoverable insurance amounts as a component of other long‑term assets.  The amounts recorded represent our estimate of the probable losses and anticipated recoveries for unreported claims related to products sold and services performed prior to the balance sheet date.

Legal Contingencies

Legal Contingencies



We accrue losses from a legal contingency when the loss is both probable and reasonably estimable.  The accuracy of our estimates of losses for legal contingencies is limited by uncertainties surrounding litigation.  Therefore, actual results may differ significantly from the amounts accrued, if any.  We accrue for legal contingencies as a component of accrued expenses and/or other long‑term liabilities.  Gains from legal contingencies are recorded when the contingency is resolved. 

Legal Fees

Legal Fees



We expense the costs of legal services, including legal services related to product and tissue processing liability claims and legal contingencies, as they are incurred.  Reimbursement of legal fees by an insurance company or other third party is recorded as a reduction to legal expense.



Uncertain Tax Positions

Uncertain Tax Positions



We periodically assess our uncertain tax positions and recognize tax benefits if they are “more-likely-than-not” to be upheld upon review by the appropriate taxing authority.  We measure the tax benefit by determining the maximum amount that has a “greater than 50 percent likelihood” of ultimately being realized.  We reverse previously accrued liabilities for uncertain tax positions when audits are concluded, statutes expire, administrative practices dictate that a liability is no longer warranted, or in other circumstances as deemed necessary.  These assessments can be complex and we often obtain assistance from external advisors to make these assessments.  We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in other (income) expense, net on our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.  See Note 12 for further discussion of our liabilities for uncertain tax positions. 

Deferred Income Taxes

Deferred Income Taxes



Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and tax return purposes.  We periodically assess the recoverability of our deferred tax assets, as necessary, when we experience changes that could materially affect our determination of the recoverability of our deferred tax assets.  We provide a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets when, as a result of this analysis, we believe it is more likely than not that some portion or all of our deferred tax assets will not be realized.



Assessing the recoverability of deferred tax assets involves judgment and complexity in conjunction with prudent and feasible tax planning.  Estimates and judgments used in the determination of the need for a valuation allowance and in calculating the amount of a needed valuation allowance include, but are not limited to, the following:



·

Projected future operating results;

·

Anticipated future state tax apportionment;

·

Timing and amounts of anticipated future taxable income;

·

Timing of the anticipated reversal of book/tax temporary differences;

·

Evaluation of statutory limits regarding usage of certain tax assets; and

·

Evaluation of the statutory periods over which certain tax assets can be utilized. 



Significant changes in the factors above, or other factors, could affect our ability to use our deferred tax assets.  Such changes could have a material, adverse impact on our profitability, financial position, and cash flows.  We will continue to assess the recoverability of our deferred tax assets, as necessary, when we experience changes that could materially affect our prior determination of the recoverability of our deferred tax assets. 



We believe that the realizability of our acquired net operating loss carryforwards will be limited in future periods due to a change in control of our former subsidiaries Hemosphere, Inc. (“Hemosphere”) and Cardiogenesis Corporation (“Cardiogenesis”), as mandated by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.  We believe that our acquisitions of these companies each constituted a change in control as defined in Section 382 and that, prior to our acquisition, Hemosphere had experienced other equity ownership changes that should be considered such a change in control.  We acquired net operating loss carryforwards in the acquisition of On-X, the majority of which have been realized.    We also acquired net operating loss carryforwards in certain foreign jurisdictions in our recent acquisition of JOTEC.  While our analysis is still on-going, we believe these loss carryforwards will be fully realizable.  The deferred tax assets recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets exclude amounts that we expect will not be realizable due to changes in control.  A portion of the acquired net operating loss carryforwards is related to state income taxes for which we believe it is more likely than not, that some will not be realized.  Therefore, we recorded a valuation allowance against these state net operating loss carryforwards.



Valuation Of Acquired Assets Or Businesses

Valuation of Acquired Assets or Businesses



As part of our corporate strategy, we are seeking to identify and capitalize upon acquisition opportunities of complementary product lines and companies.  We evaluate and account for acquired patents, licenses, distribution rights, and other tangible or intangible assets as the purchase of an asset or asset group, or as a business combination, as appropriate.  The determination of whether the purchase of a group of assets should be accounted for as an asset group or as a business combination requires judgment based on the weight of available evidence.



For the purchase of an asset group, we allocate the cost of the asset group, including transaction costs, to the individual assets purchased based on their relative estimated fair values.  In-process research and development acquired as part of an asset group is expensed upon acquisition.  We account for business combinations using the acquisition method.  Under this method, the allocation of the purchase price is based on the fair value of the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and the liabilities assumed as of the date of the acquisition.  The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the tangible net assets and identifiable intangible assets is recorded as goodwill.  Transaction costs related to business combinations are expensed as incurred.  In-process research and development acquired as part of a business combination is accounted for as an indefinite-lived intangible asset until the related research and development project gains regulatory approval or is discontinued.



We typically engage external advisors to assist us in determining the fair value of acquired asset groups or business combinations, using valuation methodologies such as: the excess earnings, the discounted cash flow, or the relief from royalty methods.  The determination of fair value in accordance with the fair value measurement framework requires significant judgments and estimates, including, but not limited to: timing of product life cycles, estimates of future revenues, estimates of profitability for new or acquired products, cost estimates for new or changed manufacturing processes, estimates of the cost or timing of obtaining regulatory approvals, estimates of the success of competitive products, and discount rates and represent level 3 measurements.  We, in consultation with our advisors, make these estimates based on our prior experiences and industry knowledge.  We believe that our estimates are reasonable, but actual results could differ significantly from our estimates.  A significant change in our estimates used to value acquired asset groups or business combinations could result in future write-downs of tangible or intangible assets acquired by us and, therefore, could materially impact our financial position and profitability.  If the value of the liabilities assumed by us, including contingent liabilities, is determined to be significantly different from the amounts previously recorded in purchase accounting, we may need to record additional expenses or write-downs in future periods, which could materially impact our financial position and profitability.

Derivative Instruments

Derivative Instruments



We determine the fair value of our stand-alone and embedded derivative instruments at issuance and record any resulting asset or liability on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.  Changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments are recognized in other (income) expense on our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income. 

New Accounting Pronouncements

New Accounting Pronouncements



In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) amended its Accounting Standards Codification and created a new Topic 842, Leases.  The final guidance requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date and recognize expenses on their income statements similar to the current Topic 840, Leases.  It is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is permitted.  We are evaluating the impact the adoption of this standard will have on our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.



In May 2014 the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Since ASU 2014-09 was issued, several additional ASUs have been issued to clarify various elements of the guidance.  These standards provide guidance on recognizing revenue, including a five-step model to determine when revenue recognition is appropriate.  The standard requires that an entity recognize revenue to depict the transfer of control of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. As required, we have adopted the new standard effective January 1, 2018.  We are using the modified retrospective method and under this method we will have a cumulative catch up adjustment and will be providing additional disclosures in future filings including a comparison of results under the new standard to the previous standard.  We have completed an initial evaluation of the potential impact from adopting the new standard, including a detailed review of performance obligations for all material revenue streams.  We currently believe the most significant impacts may include the following items:



·

Certain distributor agreements included inventory buyback provisions under defined change of business conditions which, under the new standard, would not qualify as a completed revenue transaction because these provisions could prevent us from transferring control to the distributor and would, therefore, result in a reversal of revenue and recording of deferred revenue until the proper criteria are met.  We have modified most of our agreements to remove the buyback provisions effective on or before January 1, 2018.  As of January 1, 2018, there were certain remaining agreements with buyback provisions that had not been modified.  We expect to record a cumulative effect adjustment upon adoption of the new standard to record the deferred revenue associated with these agreements.  The deferred revenue will be recognized over future periods as the medical devices are implanted during the remaining term of the agreement.

·

Certain JOTEC products are manufactured to order, have no alternative use, and contain an enforceable right to payment for the performance completed. The revenue impact of these agreements is not material, but it is anticipated the sale of these products will increase over time. We expect to record a cumulative effect adjustment upon adoption of the new standard to record the deferred revenue associated with these agreements.



Based on the procedures and calculations completed to date, we do not expect that the combined cumulative effect adjustments will be material to our financial statements.  In addition, we have not identified other matters related to the adoption of the standard that we believe would have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.