XML 38 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT

Regulation

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

10.

Regulation

The Company and the University are subject to significant federal, state and regulatory oversight. The U.S. Department of Education (the “Department”) previously attempted to define “an eligible program of training to prepare students for gainful employment in a recognized occupation.” After a federal court invalidated the Department’s regulation, the Department established a negotiated rulemaking committee to consider the issue of gainful employment. The negotiations did not result in the required consensus. On March 25, 2014, the Department issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for public comment, and on October 31, 2014, the Department published the final regulation which became effective on July 1, 2015.

The new requirements include two debt-to-earnings measures, consisting of an annual earnings rate and a discretionary income rate. The annual earnings rate measures student debt payments in relation to earnings, and the discretionary income rate measures student debt payments in relation to discretionary income. Under the new gainful employment regulation, a program would pass if the program’s graduates:

●

have an annual earnings rate that does not exceed 8%; or

●

have a discretionary income rate that does not exceed 20%.

In addition, a program that does not pass either of the debt-to-earnings metrics, and that has an annual earnings rate between 8% and 12%, or a discretionary income rate between 20% and 30%, would be considered to be in a warning zone. A program would fail if the program’s graduates have an annual earnings rate of 12% or greater and a discretionary income rate of 30% or greater. A program would become Title IV-ineligible for three years if it fails both metrics for two out of three consecutive years, or fails to pass at least one metric for four consecutive award years.

If an institution is notified by the Secretary of Education that a program could become ineligible, based on its final rates, for the next award year:

●

the institution must provide a warning with respect to the program to students and prospective students indicating, among other things, that students may not be able to use Title IV funds to attend or continue in the program; and

●

the institution must not enroll, register or enter into a financial commitment with a prospective student until a specified time after providing the warning to the prospective student.

The new regulation also requires institutions to report student and program level data to the Department, and comply with additional disclosure requirements, beginning in January 2017.

The University timely submitted the required reporting in July and September 2015. On October 9, 2015, the Department of Education notified the University that it was not in full compliance with reporting requirements for gainful employment programs and thus no decisions on new programs or locations will be issued. Although the University had timely reported all information for gainful employment programs, the Department did not recognize the submissions as complete due to erroneous academic program codes in the Common Origination and Disbursement system. The University has remediated the errors.

In addition, the gainful employment regulation requires institutions to certify by December 31, 2015, among other things, that each eligible gainful employment program is programmatically accredited if required by a federal governmental entity or a state governmental entity in the state in which it is located or is otherwise required to obtain state approval. The institution must also certify that each eligible program satisfies the applicable educational prerequisites for professional licensure or certification requirements in each state in which it is located or is otherwise required to obtain state approval, so that a student who completes the program and seeks employment in that state qualifies to take any licensure or certification exam that is needed for the student to practice or find employment in an occupation that the program prepares students to enter.

The requirements associated with the gainful employment regulations will substantially increase the Company’s administrative burdens and could affect the University’s student enrollment, persistence and retention. Further, although the regulations provide opportunities for an institution to correct any potential deficiencies in a program prior to the loss of Title IV eligibility, the continuing eligibility of the University’s academic programs will be affected by factors beyond management’s control such as changes in graduates’ income levels, changes in student borrowing levels, increases in interest rates, changes in the percentage of former students who are current in the repayment of their student loans, and various other factors. Even if the Company were able to correct any deficiency in the gainful employment metrics in a timely manner, the disclosure requirements associated with a program’s failure to pass at least one metric may adversely affect student enrollments in that program and may adversely affect the reputation of the University.

In November 2014, two organizations filed separate lawsuits against the Department in federal courts seeking to have the new regulation invalidated. Both suits alleged that the Department exceeded its statutory authority in promulgating the regulation, that the regulation violates the institutions’ constitutional rights, and that the regulation is arbitrary and capricious. In both cases, the courts dismissed the lawsuits, upholding the regulation.

The University must comply with the campus safety and security reporting requirements as well as other requirements in the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act, or Clery Act, including recent changes made to the Clery Act by the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013, and the Department subsequently promulgated regulations implementing the recent amendments to the Clery Act. In addition, the Department has interpreted Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, or Title IX, to categorize sexual violence as a form of prohibited sex discrimination and to require institutions to follow certain disciplinary procedures with respect to such offenses. Failure to comply with the Clery Act or Title IX requirements or regulations thereunder could result in action by the Department to require corrective action, fine the Company or limit or suspend its participation in Title IV programs, could lead to litigation, and could harm the Company’s reputation.

The University is subject to announced and unannounced compliance reviews and audits by various external agencies, including the Department, its Office of Inspector General, state licensing agencies, and accrediting agencies. The Department conducted four campus-based program reviews of University campuses in three states and the District of Columbia during the third quarter of 2014, and two of the reviews also covered compliance with the Clery Act, the Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act, and regulations related thereto. The Department issued an Expedited Final Program Review Determination Letter for one of the program reviews, closing the program review with no further action required by the Company. The Company received a Program Review Report for another program review and provided a response to the Department, following which the Company received a Final Program Review Determination letter, closing the review with no further action required by the Company. On March 24, 2015, the Company received a Program Review Report for another program review, and provided a response to the Department on April 21, 2015. On April 29, 2015, the Company received a Final Program Review Determination Letter closing the review and identifying a payment of less than $500 due to the Department of Education based on an underpayment on a return to Title IV calculation. The Company remitted payment, and received a letter from the Department on May 26, 2015, indicating that no further action was required and that the matter was closed. On September 15, 2015, the Company received a Program Review report for the final program review, and provided a response to the Department on October 5, 2015. The Company has yet to receive a Final Program Review Determination letter.

Each institution participating in Title IV programs must enter into a Program Participation Agreement with the Department. Under the agreement, the institution agrees to follow the Department’s rules and regulations governing Title IV programs. On October 1, 2014, the University received an executed provisional Program Participation Agreement from the Department allowing it to participate in Title IV programs until June 30, 2017. The Program Participation Agreement was issued on a provisional basis because of the Department’s open program reviews. Under the provisional agreement, the only material additional condition with which the University must comply is obtaining Department approval for substantial changes, including the addition of any new location, level of academic offering, non-degree program, or degree program.