XML 28 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.19.2

Commitments and Contingencies | 6 Months Ended
--- | ---
Jun. 30, 2019
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract] |
Commitments and Contingencies | Commitments and Contingencies Lessee Arrangements — Ground Leases The Company leases land under ground leases for eight of its properties with lease durations ranging from 16 to 85 years as of June 30, 2019. On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASU 2016- 02 and recorded ROU assets and lease liabilities related to these ground leases, which are all considered operating leases under the new standard (see Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Polices for additional information on the impact of adopting the new standard). As of June 30, 2019, the Company’s balance sheet includes ROU assets and liabilities of $51.6 million and $24.6 million, respectively, which are included in prepaid expenses and other assets and accounts payable and accrued expenses, respectively. In determining operating ROU assets and lease liabilities for the Company’s existing operating leases upon the adoption of the new lease guidance as well as for new operating leases in the current period, the Company was required to estimate an appropriate incremental borrowing rate on a fully-collateralized basis for the terms of the leases. Since the terms of the Company’s ground leases are significantly longer than the terms of borrowings available to the Company on a fully-collateralized basis, the Company’s estimate of this rate required significant judgment. The Company’s ground operating leases have a weighted-average remaining lease term of approximately 34.0 years and a weighted-average discount rate of 4.33% as of June 30, 2019. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company paid cash of approximately $0.3 million and $0.7 million for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities and recorded expense of $0.3 million and $0.7 million, respectively, on a straight-line basis in accordance with the standard. The lease expense is recorded in property operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The Company entered one additional ground lease during the quarter ended June 30, 2019. The Company incurred rent expense on ground leases of $0.3 million and $0.7 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018. The following table reflects the base cash rental payments due from the Company as of June 30, 2019:
(In thousands) |  | Future Base Rent Payments (1)
2019 (remainder) |  | $ | 1,038 |
2020 |  | 1,385 |
2021 |  | 1,385 |
2022 |  | 1,385 |
2023 |  | 1,385 |
2024 |  | 1,390 |
Thereafter |  | 40,189 |
Total minimum lease payments (2) |  | 48,157 |
Less: Effects of discounting |  | (23,516 | )
Total present value of lease payments |  | $ | 24,641 |
(1) | Assumes exchange rates of £1.00 to $1.27 for GBP and €1.00 to $1.14 for EUR as of June 30, 2019 for illustrative purposes, as applicable.
(2) | Ground lease rental payments due for the Company’s ING Amsterdam lease are not included in the table above as the Company’s ground for this property is prepaid through 2050.
The following table reflects the base cash rental payments due from the Company as of December 31, 2018:
(In thousands) |  | Future Base Rent Payments (1)
2019 |  | $ | 1,371 |
2020 |  | 1,371 |
2021 |  | 1,371 |
2022 |  | 1,371 |
2023 |  | 1,371 |
Thereafter |  | 40,519 |
Total minimum lease payments (2) |  | 47,374 |
Less: Effects of discounting |  | (23,370 | )
Total present value of lease payments |  | $ | 24,004 |
(1) | Assumes exchange rates of £1.00 to $1.27 for GBP and €1.00 to $1.14 for EUR as of December 31, 2018 for illustrative purposes, as applicable.
(2) | Ground lease rental payments due for the Company’s ING Amsterdam lease are not included in the table above as the Company’s ground for this property is prepaid through 2050.
Litigation and Regulatory Matters In the ordinary course of business, the Company may become subject to litigation, claims and regulatory matters. There are no material legal or regulatory proceedings pending or known to be contemplated against the Company. On January 25, 2018, the Former Service Provider filed a complaint against (i) the Company and the OP; (ii) the Property Manager, Global Net Lease Special Limited Partner, LLC, an affiliate of AR Global that directly owns the Advisor and the Property Manager, and the Advisor (collectively, the “GNL Advisor Defendants”); and (iii) AR Capital Global Holdings, LLC, and AR Global (together, the “AR Defendants”), in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York (“New York Supreme Court”). The complaint alleged that the notice sent to the Former Service Provider by the Company on January 15, 2018, terminating the Former Service Provider Agreement, was a pretext to enable the AR Defendants to seize the Former Service Provider’s business. The complaint alleged breach of contract against the Company, the OP and the GNL Advisor Defendants, and tortious interference against the AR Defendants. The complaint sought: (i) monetary damages against the defendants, (ii) to enjoin the termination of the Service Provider Agreement, and (iii) judgment declaring the termination to be void. On March 4, 2019, the parties entered into a settlement agreement pursuant to which the lawsuit was dismissed. The Company paid $7.4 million to the Former Service Provider pursuant to the settlement agreement. The Company recorded a reserve of $7.4 million related to the then anticipated settlement payment during the fourth quarter of 2018 and subsequently paid the settlement amount during the first quarter of 2019. During the six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company incurred approximately $1.0 million in additional legal expenses related to this litigation. These costs are included in acquisition, transaction and other costs in the consolidated statement of operations. Environmental Matters In connection with the ownership and operation of real estate, the Company may potentially be liable for costs and damages related to environmental matters. As of June 30, 2019, the Company had not been notified by any governmental authority of any non-compliance, liability or other claim, and is not aware of any other environmental condition that it believes will have a material adverse effect on the results of operations.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for commitments and contingencies. + References Reference 1: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 450 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/topic&trid=2127136 Reference 2: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 440 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/topic&trid=2144648 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration