XML 57 R31.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Retirement And Deferred Compensation Plans (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Retirement And Deferred Compensation Plans [Abstract]  
Reconciliation of changes in benefit obligations and fair value of plan assets and funded status of plans
We sponsor several qualified and nonqualified pension plans covering permanent employees. The reconciliation of the changes in the plans’ benefit obligations and the fair value of plan assets and the funded status of the plans were as follows:
 
       U.S. Plans   Non-U.S. Plans  
Year Ended December 31  2011   2010   2011   2010  
Change in Benefit Obligation                 
Benefit obligation, beginning of year $ 56.2  $ 51.7  $ 244.8  $ 225.6  
 Service cost      9.9   8.6  
 Interest cost  2.8   2.8   12.7   11.7  
 Curtailments      (1.9)   
 Transfers      (0.5)  (0.4)
 Actuarial loss  3.1   5.7   9.4   11.8  
 Plan participant contributions      2.4   2.1  
 Benefits paid  (4.6)  (4.0)  (6.6)  (4.1)
 Currency exchange rate changes      (5.5)  (10.5)
Benefit obligation, end of year $ 57.5  $ 56.2  $ 264.7  $ 244.8  
Change in Plan Assets                 
Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year $ 36.4  $ 35.0  $ 226.1  $ 200.6  
 Actual return on plan assets  (0.4)  2.7   17.4   20.0  
 Curtailments      (1.1)   
 Transfers      (1.1)   
 Plan participant contributions      2.4   2.1  
 Company contributions  3.3   2.7   18.3   16.6  
 Benefits paid  (4.6)  (4.0)  (6.6)  (4.1)
 Currency exchange rate changes      (5.0)  (9.1)
Fair value of plan assets, end of year $ 34.7  $ 36.4  $ 250.4  $ 226.1  
Funded Status at End of Year                 
Funded status, end of year $ (22.8) $ (19.8) $ (14.3) $ (18.7)
Amounts Recognized                 
Noncurrent assets $ 12.2  $ 14.3  $ 29.0  $ 23.7  
Current liabilities  (2.8)  (2.6)  (0.2)  (0.4)
Noncurrent liabilities  (32.2)  (31.5)  (43.1)  (42.0)
Net amount recognized $ (22.8) $ (19.8) $ (14.3) $ (18.7)
 
We provide medical and dental benefits to certain eligible retired employees in the U.S. Due to the nature of the plan, there are no plan assets. The reconciliation of the changes in the plan’s benefit obligation and the statement of the funded status of the plan were as follows:
 
Year Ended December 31  2011   2010  
Change in Benefit Obligation         
Benefit obligation, beginning of year $ 25.5  $ 24.6  
 Service cost  0.1   0.1  
 Interest cost  1.3   1.4  
 Actuarial loss  3.3   1.1  
 Benefits paid  (1.9)   (1.9)  
 Plan participant contributions  0.1    
 Retiree drug subsidy reimbursement  0.1   0.2  
Benefit obligation, end of year $ 28.5  $ 25.5  
Funded Status at End of Year         
Funded status, end of year $ (28.5)  $ (25.5)  
Amounts Recognized         
Current liabilities $ (1.6)  $ (1.6)  
Noncurrent liabilities  (26.9)   (23.9)  
Net amount recognized $ (28.5)  $ (25.5)  
 
Amounts recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), net of tax
Amounts recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, consist of:
 
       U.S. Plans   Non-U.S. Plans  
December 31  2011   2010   2011   2010  
Net loss $ 12.8  $ 9.3  $ 7.0  $ 2.4  
Prior service cost  0.2   0.2   6.5   7.2  
Total $ 13.0  $ 9.5  $ 13.5  $ 9.6  
Plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of fair value of plan assets
The accumulated benefit obligation for certain of our plans exceeded the fair value of plan assets as follows:
 
December 31  2011   2010  
Accumulated benefit obligation $ 6.3  $ 5.8  
Plan assets  6.2   5.7  
 
Plans with projected benefit obligation in excess of fair value of plan assets
The projected benefit obligation for certain of our plans exceeded the fair value of plan assets as follows:
December 31  2011   2010  
Projected benefit obligation $ 41.7  $ 173.7  
Plan assets  35.8   163.8  
 
Components of net periodic benefit cost and other amounts recognized in Other Comprehensive Loss (Income)
The components of the net periodic benefit cost and other amounts recognized in Other comprehensive loss (income) for all plans were as follows:
 
Year Ended December 31  2011   2010   2009  
Service cost $ 9.9  $ 8.6  $ 11.1  
Interest cost  15.5   14.5   14.1  
Expected return on assets  (15.2)  (13.4)  (12.6)
Curtailment and settlement  (1.0)    (4.3)
Net gain  (0.2)  (1.2)  (2.1)
Prior service cost  0.7   0.7   0.5  
Net periodic benefit cost  9.7   9.2   6.7  
Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations             
Recognized in Other Comprehensive Loss (Income)             
Net loss (gain)  11.6   8.5   (9.0)
Amortization of net gain  0.2   1.2   3.0  
Amortization of prior service cost  (0.7)  (0.7)  (0.8)
Total recognized in other comprehensive loss (income)  11.1   9.0   (6.8)
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive loss (income) $ 20.8  $ 18.2  $ (0.1)
 
The components of net periodic benefit cost for this plan were as follows:
 
Year Ended December 31  2011   2010   2009  
Net Periodic Benefit Cost             
Service cost $ 0.1  $ 0.1  $ 0.1  
Interest cost  1.3   1.4   1.4  
Net gain    (0.1)  (0.7)
Net periodic benefit cost  1.4   1.4   0.8  
Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations Recognized in Other Comprehensive Loss          
Net loss  3.3   1.1   1.8  
Amortization of net gain    0.1   0.7  
Total recognized in other comprehensive loss  3.3   1.2   2.5  
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive loss $ 4.7  $ 2.6  $ 3.3  
 
Weighted-average assumptions used in measurement of benefit obligation and net periodic benefit cost
The weighted-average assumptions used in the measurement of the benefit obligation were as follows:
 
       U.S. Plans   Non-U.S. Plans  
Year Ended December 31  2011   2010   2011   2010  
Discount rate  4.6%   5.1%   4.7%   5.1%  
Rate of compensation increase  3.0%   4.0%   4.0%   4.3%  
 
The weighted-average assumptions used in the measurement of the net periodic benefit cost were as follows:
 
   U.S. Plans   Non-U.S. Plans  
Year Ended December 31  2011   2010   2009   2011   2010   2009  
Discount rate  5.1%   5.7%   6.4%   5.1%   5.5%   5.7%  
Expected long-term return on plan assets  7.0%   7.3%   7.3%   5.3%   5.5%   5.7%  
Rate of compensation increase  4.0%   4.0%   4.0%   4.3%   4.5%   4.2%  
 
Fair value of plan assets by asset category
The fair value of our pension plan assets are primarily determined by using market quotes and other relevant information that is generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets. The fair value of our pension plan assets by asset category was as follows:
 
   U.S. Plans   Non-U.S. Plans  
   Fair Value Measurements Using   Fair Value Measurements Using  
       Quoted Prices               Quoted Prices          
       in Active   Significant           in Active   Significant      
       Markets for   Other   Significant       Markets for   Other   Significant  
       Identical   Observable   Unobservable       Identical   Observable   Unobservable  
   December 31,   Assets   Inputs   Inputs   December 31,   Assets   Inputs   Inputs  
   2011   (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3)  2011   (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3)
Asset Category                                 
Cash and cash equivalents(1) $ 1.8  $ 1.8  $ –  $ –  $ 1.5  $ 1.5  $ –  $ –  
Equity securities:                                 
 U.S. companies  15.4   15.4              
 International companies          57.9   57.9      
Fixed income securities:                                 
 Government bonds(2)  17.5     17.5            
 Corporate bonds          59.4     59.4    
 Guaranteed insurance contracts          38.4     38.4    
Other types of investments:                                 
 Unitized funds(3)          87.9   87.9      
 Real estate funds          5.3     5.3     – 
  $ 34.7  $ 17.2  $ 17.5  $ –  $ 250.4  $ 147.3  $ 103.1  $ –  

(1)
This category includes a prime obligations money market portfolio.
(2)
This category includes U.S. Treasury/Federal agency securities and foreign government securities.
(3)
This category includes investments in approximately 80% fixed income securities, 10% equity and 10% cash and cash equivalents.
 
   U.S. Plans   Non-U.S. Plans  
   Fair Value Measurements Using   Fair Value Measurements Using  
       Quoted               Quoted          
       Prices               Prices          
       in Active   Significant           in Active   Significant      
       Markets for   Other   Significant       Markets for   Other   Significant  
       Identical   Observable   Unobservable       Identical   Observable   Unobservable  
   December 31,   Assets   Inputs   Inputs   December 31,   Assets   Inputs   Inputs  
   2010   (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3)  2010   (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3)
Asset Category                                 
Cash and cash equivalents(1) $ 2.5  $ 2.5  $ –  $ –  $ 4.2  $ 4.2  $ –  $ –  
Equity securities:                                 
 U.S. companies  15.9   15.9       2.7   2.2     0.5  
 International companies          61.0   61.0      
Fixed income securities:                                 
 Government bonds(2)  18.0     18.0     13.1     13.1    
 Corporate bonds          49.9     49.9    
 Guaranteed insurance contracts          8.8     8.8    
Other types of investments:                                 
 Unitized funds(3)          75.7   75.7      
 Equity hedge funds          0.9     0.9    
 Real estate funds          9.8     4.8   5.0  
  $ 36.4  $ 18.4  $ 18.0  $ –  $ 226.1  $ 143.1  $ 77.5  $ 5.5  

(1)
This category includes a prime obligations money market portfolio.
(2)
This category includes U.S. Treasury/Federal agency securities and foreign government securities.
(3)
This category includes investments in approximately 80% fixed income securities and 20% equity.
 
Effect of one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates
The health care cost trend rate was assumed to remain flat at 7.5% through 2013, then grading to an ultimate rate of 5.0% in 2020. Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported. A one-percentage point change in the assumed health care cost trend rate would have the following effects:
 
   1% Increase   1% Decrease  
Effect on total of service and interest cost components $ 0.2  $ (0.2)
Effect on benefit obligation  3.7   (3.2)
 
Projected future benefit payments
Projected benefit payments from the plans as of December 31, 2011 were estimated as follows:
 
       Retiree Health  
Year  Pension Plans   Care Plan  
2012 $ 10.2  $ 1.4  
2013  10.6   1.5  
2014  11.3   1.5  
2015  11.9   1.5  
2016  12.6   1.6  
2017–2021  76.8   8.2  
Total projected benefit payments $ 133.4  $ 15.7