XML 42 R26.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.25.0.1
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2024
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair Value Measurements
We measure our financial assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis using a hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. Authoritative guidance establishes three levels of the fair value hierarchy as follows:
Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2: Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and
Level 3: Fair value measurements derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, money market funds, accounts receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses, revolving credit facilities, and other current liabilities approximate fair value due to their short-term nature, and are therefore categorized within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
Our money market funds accrue dividends, which are reinvested in the funds, and are reflected in their carrying value of the funds. As of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, the carrying value of our money market funds was $304.1 million and $196.5 million, respectively, which is included in cash and cash equivalents on our consolidated balance sheets. During years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, we recognized $8.7 million, $3.5 million, and a nominal amount, respectively, of dividend income on our money market funds. Dividend income is included in other income, net in our consolidated statements of operations.
Hedging instruments are re-measured on a recurring basis using broker quotes, daily market foreign currency rates, and interest rate curves as applicable (see Note 18) and are therefore categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The following table summarizes the valuation of our foreign currency forward contracts and interest rate hedge agreements (see Note 18) that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, and are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy as of the periods presented below (in millions):
Level 2 Fair Value
December 31, 2024
Foreign currency forward contracts—asset position$5.7 
Foreign currency forward contracts—liability position(1.0)
Interest rate hedge agreements—asset position7.8 
Interest rate hedge agreements—liability position— 
Total$12.5 
December 31, 2023
Foreign currency forward contracts—asset position$0.2 
Foreign currency forward contracts—liability position(4.5)
Interest rate hedge agreements—asset position5.2 
Interest rate hedge agreements—liability position(2.6)
Total$(1.7)
There were no transfers of financial instruments between the levels of the fair value hierarchy during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.
Disclosures about the Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The table below presents information about the fair value of our financial liabilities whose value were derived using Level 2 inputs of the fair value hierarchy, and is provided for comparative purposes only, relative to the carrying values of our financial instruments recognized in the consolidated balance sheets for the periods presented below (in millions):
 December 31, 2024December 31, 2023
Carrying
Value		Fair
Value		Carrying
Value		Fair 
Value
2023 ABL Credit Facility$— $— $26.3 $26.3 
2022 Japan ABL Credit Facility$25.4 $25.4 $28.4 $28.4 
2023 Term Loan B$1,178.1 $1,175.2 $1,240.6 $1,242.2 
Convertible Notes$258.3 $250.1 $258.3 $277.0 
Equipment Notes$11.7 $10.7 $19.2 $17.0 
Mortgage Loans$44.3 $53.0 $45.4 $54.8 
Non-recurring Fair Value Measurements
We measure certain assets at fair value on a non-recurring basis at least annually or more frequently if it is determined that impairment indicators are present. These assets include long-lived assets, goodwill, non-amortizing intangible assets and investments, which are written down to fair value when they are classified as held for sale or determined to be impaired.
During the year ended December 31, 2024, we recognized $1,459.4 million of total impairment charges, of which $1,452.0 million was related to the impairment of Topgolf’s goodwill and trade name (see Note 9), $3.4 million was related to the abandonment of our Shankstars online digital game in our Topgolf segment, and $3.3 million was recognized as a result of an assessment of retail locations of our Jack Wolfskin business in connection with our restructuring and reorganization initiatives within our Active Lifestyle segment (see Note 21). In relation to our Jack Wolfskin business, we determined that certain operating ROU and fixed assets related to certain retail stores may not be fully recoverable based on the estimated cash flows for these stores over the remaining lease terms and asset lives, therefore we reduced the carrying values of these assets. The impairment losses related to Topgolf’s goodwill and trade name and the retail locations at Jack Wolfskin reduced the carrying values of these assets to their fair values which are categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, and were recognized within selling, general and administrative expense within our consolidated statement of operations. The impairment loss related to the abandonment of Shankstars was recognized within research and development costs within our consolidated statement of operations.
During the year ended December 31, 2023, we recognized $11.7 million of impairment losses related to the abandonment of our Shankstars online digital game, which were included within research and development costs on our consolidated statements of operations.
During the year ended December 31, 2022, we recognized $5.5 million of total impairment losses, of which $4.8 million was related to the impairment of property, plant and equipment at an underperforming premerger Topgolf concept location, and was included in other venue expenses in our consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of the location was determined using the cost approach for similar assets, which considers the highest and best use of these assets, and was categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.