Commitments and Contingencies	9 Months Ended
Commitments and Contingencies	Sep. 30, 2022
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Commitments and Contingencies	COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES License Agreement. The Company has a license agreement in place with terms that include payment of royalties of 5% of specified product sales. The agreement terminates the later of 2023 or upon expiration of the underlying patents or patent applications, which is expected to occur after 2023. Parties to the license agreement have the right at any time to terminate the agreement immediately for cause. Royalty expense of $804 and $792 was recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021 and $2,474 and $2,356 for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021 as a component of Cost of Revenue in the accompanying Condensed and Consolidated Statement of Operations. Purchase Agreements. The Company enters into standard purchase agreements with vendors in the ordinary course of business, generally with terms that allow cancellation. Legal. The Company may, from time to time, become a party to legal proceedings. Such matters are subject to many uncertainties and to outcomes of which the financial impacts are not predictable with assurance and that may not be known for extended periods of time. A liability is established once management determines a loss is probable and an amount can be reasonably estimated. The Company received a Civil Investigative Demand (CID) from the U.S. Department of Justice (USDOJ) in December 2017 stating that it is investigating the Company to determine whether the Company has violated the False Claims Act, relating to the promotion of certain medical devices related to the treatment of atrial fibrillation for off-label use and submitted or caused to be submitted false claims to certain federal and state health care programs for medically unnecessary healthcare services related to the treatment of atrial fibrillation. The CID covers the period from January 2010 to December 2017 and required the production of documents and answers to written interrogatories. The Company had no knowledge of the investigation prior to receipt of the CID. The Company maintains rigorous policies and procedures to promote compliance with the False Claims Act and other applicable regulatory requirements. The Company provided the USDOJ with documents and answers to the written interrogatories. In March 2021, USDOJ informed the Company that its investigation was based on a lawsuit brought on behalf of the United States and various state and local governments under the qui tam provisions of federal and certain state and local False Claims Acts. Although the USDOJ and all of the state and local governments declined to intervene, the relator continues to pursue the case. During the third quarter, the relator filed a Fourth Amended Complaint, which dropped allegations of off-label promotion and now alleges that the Company paid illegal kickbacks to healthcare providers in exchange for using or referring the Company’s products, in violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and various comparable state and local laws. While the Company is contesting the case, it is not possible to predict when this matter may be resolved or what impact, if any, the outcome of this matter might have on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. On August 23, 2022, the Cleveland Clinic Foundation (“Clinic”) and IDx Medical, Ltd. (“IDX”) filed a Demand for Arbitration against the Company with the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”), alleging that the Company breached certain provisions of the License Agreement dated December 9, 2003 among the Company, Clinic and IDX (“License Agreement”). Clinic and IDX allege the Company did not include the revenues from sales of certain products in its calculation of royalty payments due under the License Agreement. Clinic and IDX also allege that the Company did not provide related notices required under the License Agreement. The Demand for Arbitration requests a declaration that the termination of the License Agreement shall not occur until the expiration of certain patents and that the Company violated the License Agreement’s non-competition provisions. Clinic and IDX claim they are entitled to no less than $6 million plus interest and costs, fees and expenses associated with their claims and future royalties. The Company denies the allegations of Clinic and IDX. The Company filed its Answering Statement and Counterclaims to the allegations in September 2022, denying each claim and counterclaiming for breach of contract, correction of inventorship, declaratory judgment, patent prosecution and legal fees. No dates have been scheduled for this arbitration. While the Company is contesting the case, it is not possible to predict when this matter may be resolved or what impact, if any, the outcome of this matter might have on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.