XML 58 R37.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.22.4
Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2022
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments The following tables set forth the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments (Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy) (in millions):

 

 

 

December 31, 2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

Carrying Amount

 

 

Significant

Unobservable

Inputs (Level 3)

 

 

Total Fair Value

 

Financial liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior convertible notes(1)

 

$

225.4

 

 

$

253.9

 

 

$

253.9

 

MidCap credit facility(2)

 

 

39.3

 

 

 

41.1

 

 

 

41.1

 

Mann Group convertible note(3)

 

 

8.8

 

 

 

20.8

 

 

 

20.8

 

Milestone rights(4)

 

 

4.8

 

 

 

12.6

 

 

 

12.6

 

Contingent milestone liability (4)

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

1.0

 

_________________________

(1)

Fair value determined by applying a discounted cash flow analysis to the straight note with a hypothetical yield of 13%, volatility of 75.8% and a Monte Carlo simulation for the value of the conversion feature. A change in yield of + or – 2% would result in a fair value of $245.0 million and $263.4 million, respectively.

(2)

Fair value determined by applying a discounted cash flow analysis with a hypothetical yield of 12%. A change in yield of + or – 2% would result in a fair value of $40.0 million and $42.4 million, respectively.

(3)

The April 2021 amendment to the Mann Group convertible note resulted in a substantial premium of $22.1 million based on the fair value post modification which was recognized as additional paid-in capital in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2021. The accounting for the $22.1 million loss on extinguishment did not result in a change in the financial position of the Company. The fair value assessed as of December 31, 2022 was determined by applying a discounted cash flow analysis with a hypothetical yield of 13% and volatility of 77.8% to the straight note and a binomial option pricing model for the value of the conversion feature. A change in yield of + or – 2% would result in a fair value of $20.5 million and $21.2 million, respectively.

(4)

Fair value determined by applying a Monte Carlo simulation.

 

 

 

December 31, 2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

Carrying Value

 

 

Significant

Unobservable

Inputs (Level 3)

 

 

Total Fair Value

 

Financial liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior convertible notes (1)

 

$

223.9

 

 

$

237.5

 

 

$

237.5

 

MidCap credit facility (2)

 

 

38.8

 

 

 

40.8

 

 

 

40.8

 

Mann Group convertible note(3)

 

 

18.4

 

 

 

37.8

 

 

 

37.8

 

Milestone Rights (4)

 

 

5.9

 

 

 

18.1

 

 

 

18.1

 

__________________________

(1)

Fair value determined by applying a discounted cash flow analysis to the straight note with a hypothetical yield of 12%, volatility of 90% and a Monte Carlo simulation for the value of the conversion feature. A change in yield of + or – 2% would result in a fair value of $226.6 million and $249.4 million, respectively.

(2)

Fair value determined by applying a discounted cash flow analysis with a hypothetical yield of 10%. A change in yield of + or – 2% would result in a fair value of $39.1 million and $42.7 million, respectively.

(3)

The April 2021 amendment to the Mann Group convertible note resulted in a substantial premium of $22.1 million based on the fair value post modification which was recognized as additional paid-in capital in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2021. The accounting for the $22.1 million loss on extinguishment did not result in a change in the financial position of the Company. The fair value assessed as of December 31, 2021 was determined by applying a discounted cash flow analysis with a hypothetical yield of 12% and volatility of 85% to the straight note and a binomial option pricing model for the value of the conversion feature. A change in yield of + or – 2% would result in a fair value of $36.9 million and $38.8 million, respectively.

(4)

Fair value determined by applying a Monte Carlo simulation.