XML 22 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2017
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS  
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

NOTE B – FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

 

Financial Instruments

 

The following table presents the components of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, and restricted funds:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

March 31

    

December 31

 

 

 

2017

 

2016

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash deposits(1)

 

$

61,067

 

$

92,520

 

Variable rate demand notes(1)(2)

 

 

578

 

 

16,057

 

Money market funds(3)

 

 

20,608

 

 

5,703

 

Total cash and cash equivalents

 

$

82,253

 

$

114,280

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term investments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Certificates of deposit(1)

 

$

56,984

 

$

56,838

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restricted cash(4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash deposits(1)

 

$

962

 

$

962

 

 


(1)

Recorded at cost plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value.

(2)

Amounts may be redeemed on a daily basis with the original issuer.

(3)

Recorded at fair value as determined by quoted market prices (see amounts presented in the table of financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value within this Note).

(4)

Amounts restricted for use are subject to change based on the requirements of the Company’s collateralized facilities (see Note E).

 

The Company’s long-term investment financial instruments are presented in the table of financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value within this Note.

 

Concentrations of Credit Risk of Financial Instruments

The Company is potentially subject to concentrations of credit risk related to its cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments. The Company reduces credit risk by maintaining its cash deposits primarily in FDIC-insured accounts and placing its unrestricted short-term investments primarily in FDIC-insured certificates of deposit. However, certain cash deposits and certificates of deposit may exceed federally insured limits. At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, cash and cash equivalents totaling $32.6 million and $39.9 million, respectively, were not FDIC insured.

 

Fair Value Disclosure of Financial Instruments

Fair value disclosures are made in accordance with the following hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs of market data and market assumptions used to measure fair value are observable or unobservable:

 

·

Level 1 — Quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in active markets.

·

Level 2 — Quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

·

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs (Company’s market assumptions) that are significant to the valuation model. 

 

Fair value and carrying value disclosures of financial instruments are presented in the following table:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31

 

December 31

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

  

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

Carrying

    

 

Fair

    

 

Carrying

    

 

Fair

 

 

 

 

Value

 

 

Value

 

 

Value

 

 

Value

 

Credit Facility(1)

 

$

70,000

 

$

70,000

 

$

70,000

 

$

70,000

 

Accounts receivable securitization borrowings(2)

 

 

35,000

 

 

35,000

 

 

35,000

 

 

35,000

 

Notes payable(3)

 

 

121,444

 

 

120,775

 

 

138,032

 

 

137,503

 

 

 

$

226,444

 

$

225,775

 

$

243,032

 

$

242,503

 

 


(1)

The revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) carries a variable interest rate based on LIBOR, plus a margin, that is considered to be priced at market for debt instruments having similar terms and collateral requirements (Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy).

(2)

Borrowings under the Company’s accounts receivable securitization program carry a variable interest rate based on LIBOR, plus a margin. The borrowings are considered to be priced at market for debt instruments having similar terms and collateral requirements (Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy).

(3)

Fair value of the notes payable was determined using a present value income approach based on quoted interest rates from lending institutions with which the Company would enter into similar transactions (Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy).

 

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on Recurring Basis

 

The following table presents the assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements Using

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices

    

Significant

    

Significant

 

 

    

 

 

 

In Active

 

Observable

 

Unobservable

 

 

 

 

 

 

Markets

 

Inputs

 

Inputs

 

 

 

Total

    

(Level 1)

    

(Level 2)

    

(Level 3)

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Money market funds(1)

 

$

20,608

 

$

20,608

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

Equity, bond, and money market mutual funds held in trust related to the Voluntary Savings Plan(2)

 

 

2,271

 

 

2,271

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

$

22,879

 

$

22,879

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contingent consideration(3)

 

$

6,790

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

6,790

 

Interest rate swap(4)

 

 

319

 

 

 —

 

 

319

 

 

 —

 

 

 

$

7,109

 

$

 —

 

$

319

 

$

6,790

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements Using

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices

    

Significant

    

Significant

 

 

    

 

 

 

In Active

 

Observable

 

Unobservable

 

 

 

 

 

 

Markets

 

Inputs

 

Inputs

 

 

 

Total

    

(Level 1)

    

(Level 2)

    

(Level 3)

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Money market funds(1)

 

$

5,703

 

$

5,703

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

Equity, bond, and money market mutual funds held in trust related to the Voluntary Savings Plan(2)

 

 

2,220

 

 

2,220

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

$

7,923

 

$

7,923

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contingent consideration(3)

 

$

6,775

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

6,775

 

Interest rate swap(4)

 

 

542

 

 

 —

 

 

542

 

 

 —

 

 

 

$

7,317

 

$

 —

 

$

542

 

$

6,775

 

 


(1)

Included in cash and cash equivalents.

(2)

Nonqualified deferred compensation plan investments consist of U.S. and international equity mutual funds, government and corporate bond mutual funds, and money market funds which are held in a trust with a third-party brokerage firm. Included in other long-term assets, with a corresponding liability reported within other long-term liabilities.

(3)

Included in accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities, based on when expected payouts become due. The estimated fair value of contingent consideration for an earn-out agreement related to the September 2016 acquisition of LDS was determined by assessing Level 3 inputs with a discounted cash flow approach using various probability-weighted scenarios. The Level 3 assessments utilize a Monte Carlo simulation with inputs including scenarios of estimated revenues and gross margins to be achieved for the applicable performance periods, probability weightings assigned to the performance scenarios, and the discount rate applied, which was 12.3% as of March 31, 2017. Subsequent changes to the fair value as a result of recurring assessments will be recognized in operating income. 

(4)

Included in other long-term liabilities. The interest rate swap fair value was determined by discounting future cash flows and receipts based on expected interest rates observed in market interest rate curves adjusted for estimated credit valuation considerations reflecting nonperformance risk of the Company and the counterparty, which are considered to be in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The Company assessed Level 3 inputs as insignificant to the valuation at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and considers the interest rate swap valuation in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

The following table provides the changes in fair value of the liabilities measured at fair value using inputs categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contingent Consideration

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

Balances at December 31, 2016

 

$

6,775

 

Change in fair value included in operating expenses

 

 

15

 

Balances at March 31, 2017

 

$

6,790