7. Commitments and Contingencies

Surety Bonds
In the normal course of business, we are required to post bid, performance and garnishment bonds. The majority of the surety bonds posted relate to our aviation and land segments. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, we had outstanding bonds that were arranged in order to satisfy various security requirements of $34.1 million and $34.3 million, respectively. Most of these bonds provide financial security for obligations which have already been recorded as liabilities.

Lease Commitments
As of December 31, 2013, our future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases were as follows (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,


2014	$	31,649
2015		30,406
2016		24,156
2017		18,874
2018		15,385
Thereafter		40,402

	$	160,872

We incurred rental expense for all properties and equipment of $24.7 million, $27.3 million and $21.8 million for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Sales and Purchase Commitments
As of December 31, 2013, fixed sales and purchase commitments under our derivative programs amounted to $265.0 million and $13.9 million, respectively.

Additionally, as of December 31, 2013, we had entered into certain other fixed price sales commitments with corresponding fixed price purchase commitments, the majority of which were satisfied within a two-week period. These sales and purchase commitments were made in the normal course of business.

Agreements with Executive Officers and Key Employees
In March 2008, we entered into agreements with Paul H. Stebbins and Michael J. Kasbar for their continued employment with the Company. In August 2011, each of the agreements was amended to reflect the transition of Mr. Kasbar from President and Chief Operating Officer to President and Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Stebbins from Chairman and Chief Executive Officer to Executive Chairman, effective January 1, 2012. The Kasbar agreement was further amended in April 2012 to eliminate the reference to a specific annual base salary amount. The Kasbar agreement, as amended, provides for an annual base salary as determined by our Compensation Committee in its sole discretion (currently $575,000), termination severance benefits, and such incentives and other compensation and amounts as our Compensation Committee may determine from time to time in its sole discretion. The Kasbar agreement, as amended, expires on December 31, 2016, unless terminated earlier, and will automatically extend for successive one-year terms unless either party provides written notice to the other at least one year prior to the expiration of the term that such party does not want to extend the term. The Stebbins agreement, as amended, provides for an annual base salary of $750,000, which is subject to change from time to time as determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion, termination severance benefits, and such incentives and other compensation and amounts as our Compensation Committee may determine from time to time in its sole discretion. In addition, subject to approval of the Compensation Committee, Mr. Stebbins is eligible to receive annual equity-based awards with a grant-date value targeted at $500,000, 50% in the form of service-based RSUs and 50% in the form of performance-based RSUs. The Stebbins agreement, as amended, provides for an initial term of two years from the effective date, unless terminated earlier, and automatically extends for successive one-year terms unless either party provides written notice to the other at least 6 months prior to the expiration of the term that such party does not want to extend the term.

Pursuant to their amended agreements, Messrs. Kasbar and Stebbins are each entitled to receive cash severance payments if: (a) we terminate the executive's employment without cause following a change of control or for any reason other than death, disability or cause; (b) the executive resigns for good reason (generally a reduction in his responsibilities or compensation, or a breach by us), or resigns following a change of control; or (c) either the executive elects or we elect not to extend the term of the agreement, as amended. The severance payments are equal to $5.0 million for a termination following a change of control and $3.0 million in the other scenarios described above, a portion of which will be payable two years after the termination of the executive's employment. Upon any such termination, we will continue to provide coverage to the executive under our group insurance plans until he is no longer eligible for coverage under COBRA. Thereafter, we will reimburse the executive for the cost of obtaining private health insurance coverage for a certain period of time.

All of Mr. Kasbar's outstanding SSAR Awards, restricted stock and RSUs (collectively, "outstanding equity awards") will immediately vest in each scenario described in (a) and (b) above following a change of control, except for awards assumed or substituted by a successor company, in which case, such awards shall continue to vest in accordance with their applicable terms. In each scenario described in (a), (b) or (c) above where there has not been a change of control, Mr. Kasbar's outstanding equity awards will vest over a two-year period following termination of his employment, with any remaining unvested awards vesting on the last day of such two-year period. For each scenario described above, awards with multiple annual performance conditions must satisfy certain other requirements in order to have their vesting terms accelerated.

All of Mr. Stebbins' outstanding equity awards (except for RSUs having performance-based vesting criteria issued to him commencing in 2012 (the "New Performance RSUs") will vest in accordance with the same terms and conditions as described above for Mr. Kasbar's outstanding equity awards. In the case of the New Performance RSUs where a change of control has occurred: (i) if the New Performance RSUs were not assumed or substituted, then all such RSUs shall immediately vest, or (ii) if the New Performance RSUs were assumed or substituted, then all such RSUs will no longer be subject to performance-based vesting criteria but will remain subject to service-based vesting criteria. If certain termination events occur prior to a change of control and the New Performance RSUs remain outstanding, the number of RSUs that Mr. Stebbins will receive will be determined following the last day of the applicable performance period based on the Company's actual performance during such period.

The Kasbar and Stebbins agreements, as amended, also provide that in the event that any amount or benefit payable under the agreements, taken together with any amounts or benefits otherwise payable to the executive by us or any affiliated company, are subject to excise tax payments or parachute payments under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, such amounts or benefits will be reduced but only if and to the extent that the after-tax present value of such amounts or benefits as so reduced would exceed the after-tax present value received by the executive before such reduction.

We have also entered into employment agreements or separation agreements with certain of our other executive officers and key employees. These agreements provide for minimum salary levels, and, in most cases, bonuses which are payable if specified performance goals are attained. Some executive officers and key employees are also entitled to severance benefits upon termination or non-renewal of their contracts under certain circumstances.

As of December 31, 2013, the approximate future minimum commitments under these agreements, excluding discretionary and performance bonuses, are as follows (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,


2014	$	8,188
2015		6,090
2016		1,365

	$	15,643

Named Executive Officer Annual Incentive Awards
In 2013, Paul H. Stebbins, Michael J. Kasbar, Ira M. Birns and Michael S. Clementi, referred to collectively in this 2013 10-K Report as the Named Executive Officers (or "NEOs"), were eligible to receive annual share-based incentive awards (the "share-based awards"), which are specified as dollar amounts, and, in the case of Messrs. Kasbar, Birns and Clementi, annual cash incentive awards (the "cash awards"), each upon the achievement of certain annual performance targets. The performance targets for the NEOs were generally based on the growth of our net income except that the performance targets for Mr. Clementi were generally based on achieving certain levels of aviation net operating income.

Earned cash awards are generally paid in the year immediately following the performance year, and we would record the earned cash awards as compensation expense during the performance year. Earned share-based awards will be converted to the appropriate number of equity shares (in the form of RSUs) at the prevailing fair value amount on the grant date, which will occur in the year following the performance year. The equity shares will be granted under our 2006 Plan and will fully vest between 3-5 years. For accounting purposes, the share-based awards are accounted for as liability awards during the performance year until granted, when the share-based payment awards will be accounted for as equity awards. We would record compensation expense for the share-based awards proportionately at the start of the performance period until the end of the equity grant's service vesting period, and we would record a corresponding liability amount until the equity shares are granted. When the equity shares are granted, we will reclassify the outstanding liability amount to capital in excess of par value and record the amortization of the equity shares to capital in excess of par value.

The following table sets forth the cash and share-based awards earned by our NEOs, subject to future vesting terms, and the compensation expense recorded for these awards for the periods presented (in thousands):

	2013		2011


Cash awards earned	$	2,249	$	9,275
Share-based awards earned		1,646		9,604

Total earned	$	3,895	$	18,879

Compensation expense recorded*	$	2,636	$	11,535

*: The remaining compensation expense will be recorded in future periods corresponding with the share-based awards' vesting terms.

There were no cash or share-based awards earned by our NEOs in 2012. Cash and share-based awards earned by our former Chief Risk and Administration Officer, an NEO during 2011, are included in the above table.

Deferred Compensation Plans
We maintain a 401(k) defined contribution plan which covers all U.S. employees who meet minimum requirements and elect to participate. Additionally, certain of our foreign subsidiaries have defined contribution plans, which allow for voluntary contributions by the employees. The expenses for our contributions under these plans were not significant during each of the years presented on the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.

Environmental and Other Liabilities; Uninsured Risks
We provide various services to customers, including into-plane fueling at airports, fueling of vessels in-port and at-sea, and transloading, transportation and storage of fuel and fuel products. We are therefore subject to possible claims by customers, regulators and others who may be injured by a fuel spill or other accident. In addition, we may be held liable for damages to the environment arising out of such events. Although we generally maintain liability insurance for these types of events, such insurance may be inadequate. If we are held liable for any damages, and the liability is not adequately covered by insurance and is of sufficient magnitude, our financial position and results of operations will be adversely affected.

We have exited several businesses which handled hazardous and non-hazardous waste. We treated and/or transported this waste to various disposal facilities. We may be held liable as a potentially responsible party for the clean-up of such disposal facilities or be required to clean up facilities previously operated by us, pursuant to current U.S. federal and state laws and regulation. In addition, compliance with existing and future environmental laws regulating underground storage tanks located at the retail gasoline stations that we operate may require significant capital expenditures and increased operating and maintenance costs. The remediation costs and other costs required to clean up or treat contaminated sites could be substantial. We pay tank registration fees and other taxes to state trust funds established in our operating areas and maintain private insurance coverage in support of future remediation obligations. These state trust funds or other responsible third parties including insurers are expected to pay or reimburse us for remediation expenses less a deductible. To the extent third parties do not pay for remediation as we anticipate, we will be obligated to make these payments. These payments could materially adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Reimbursements from state trust funds will be dependent on the maintenance and continued solvency of the various funds.

Although we continuously review the adequacy of our insurance coverage, we may lack adequate coverage for various risks, including environmental claims. Furthermore, our ability to obtain and maintain adequate insurance and the cost of such insurance may be affected by significant claims, such as the Lac-Mégantic derailment described below, and conditions in the insurance market over which we have no control. An uninsured or under-insured claim arising out of our activities, if successful and of sufficient magnitude, will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Legal Matters

Lac-Mégantic, Quebec
We, on behalf of DPTS Marketing LLC ("DPM"), a crude oil marketing joint venture in which we own a 50% membership interest, purchased crude oil from various producers in the Bakken region of North Dakota. Dakota Petroleum Transport Solutions, LLC ("DPTS"), a crude oil transloading joint venture in which we also own a 50% membership interest, arranged for the transloading of the crude oil for DPM into tank cars at the joint venture's facility in New Town, North Dakota. We leased the tank cars used in the transloading from a number of third party lessors and subleased these tank cars to DPM. We, on behalf of DPM, contracted with Canadian Pacific Railway ("CPR") for the transportation of the tank cars and the crude oil from New Town, North Dakota to a customer in New Brunswick, Canada. CPR subcontracted a portion of that route to Montreal, Maine and Atlantic Railway ("MMA"). On July 6, 2013, the freight train operated by MMA with tank cars carrying approximately 50,000 barrels of the crude oil derailed in Lac-Mégantic, Quebec. The derailment resulted in significant loss of life, damage to the environment from spilled crude oil and extensive property damage.

In 2013, we, certain of our subsidiaries, DPM and DPTS, along with a number of third parties, including MMA and certain of its affiliates, as well as several manufacturers and lessors of tank cars, were named as defendants in twenty complaints filed in Illinois. The complaints generally allege wrongful death and negligence in the failure to provide for the proper and safe transportation of crude oil and seek economic and compensatory damages, as well as costs. In addition, in 2013, we, certain of our subsidiaries, DPM and DPTS, along with a number of other third parties, including CPR, MMA and certain of its affiliates, several manufacturers and lessors of tank cars, as well as the intended purchaser and certain suppliers of the crude oil, were named as defendants in a motion filed in Quebec Superior Court to authorize the bringing of a class-action lawsuit seeking economic, compensatory and punitive damages, as well as costs. The motion generally alleges wrongful death and negligence in the failure to provide for the proper and safe transportation of crude oil.

Furthermore, in 2013, an order was issued by the government of Quebec against MMA and us, which was subsequently modified and added CPR as a party. The orders require MMA, CPR and us to recover the spilled crude oil caused by the incident and to otherwise fully remediate the impact of the incident on the environment. We have filed a contestation of these orders before the Tribunal administratif du Québec, an administrative body responsible for hearing such proceedings, challenging the legality and validity of the orders on various grounds.

In addition to these proceedings, we have received demands for indemnification from certain tank car lessors pursuant to our lease agreements with such parties. We are currently assessing the merits of these demands as well as of the underlying claims for which such indemnification is sought. Additional claims, lawsuits, proceedings, investigations and orders may be filed, commenced or issued with respect to the incident, which may involve civil claims for damages or governmental investigative, regulatory or enforcement actions against us.

While we and our joint ventures, DPM and DPTS, maintain insurance to mitigate the costs of environmental releases as well as other results of unexpected events, including loss of life, property damage and defense costs, there can be no guarantee that our insurance will be adequate to cover all liabilities that may be incurred as a result of this incident.

We are separately evaluating potential claims that we, DPM or DPTS may assert against third parties to recover costs and other liabilities that may be incurred as a result of this incident. We can provide no guarantee that any such claims, if brought by us, will be successful or, if successful, that the responsible parties will have the financial resources to address any such claims.

We are currently unable to determine the probability of loss, or reasonably estimate a range of potential losses related to the above proceedings. Accordingly, we have not made any provision for these potential losses in our consolidated financial statements.

We have recorded total liabilities of $21.0 million based on estimated losses related to the value of the tank cars involved in the incident, as well as legal costs incurred in connection with the incident, which we believe are probable and for which a reasonable estimate can be made. We believe that a substantial portion of these liabilities are covered by insurance and have recorded total receivables of $20.9 million. As of December 31, 2013, the remaining unpaid liabilities of $9.9 million are included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities and the remaining uncollected receivable of $14.7 million is included in other current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Cathay Pacific Litigation
As of April 2012, one of our subsidiaries, World Fuel Services (Singapore) Pte Ltd. ("WFSS") was involved in litigation with Cathay Pacific Airways Limited ("Cathay") arising out of the emergency landing of a Cathay aircraft in Hong Kong in 2010, which Cathay alleged was caused by contaminated fuel supplied by WFSS. Cathay claimed damages relating to the incident of approximately $34.0 million. Effective December 24, 2013, Cathay, WFSS and the party that supplied the subject fuel to WFSS, PT Pertamina (Persero) ("Pertamina"), entered into a settlement agreement whereby Cathay, in consideration of payments from each of WFSS and Pertamina, agreed to release and forever discharge any and all claims Cathay may have against WFSS and Pertamina arising out of the incident without any admission of liability by WFSS or Pertamina. The amount paid to Cathay by WFSS under the settlement agreement was not significant and fully covered by insurance.

Other Matters
We are a party to various claims, complaints and proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business including, but not limited to, environmental claims, commercial and governmental contract claims, such as property damage, demurrage, billing and fuel quality claims, as well as bankruptcy preference claims. We have established loss provisions for these ordinary course claims as well as other matters in which losses are probable and can be reasonably estimated. As of December 31, 2013, we had recorded certain reserves which were not significant. For those matters where a reserve has not been established and for which we believe a loss is reasonably possible, as well as for matters where a reserve has been recorded but for which an exposure to loss in excess of the amount accrued is reasonably possible, we believe that such losses will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements. However, any adverse resolution of one or more such claims, complaints or proceedings during a particular period could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements or disclosures for that period.

Our estimates regarding potential losses and materiality are based on our judgment and assessment of the claims utilizing currently available information. Although we will continue to reassess our reserves and estimates based on future developments, our objective assessment of the legal merits of such claims may not always be predictive of the outcome and actual results may vary from our current estimates.