XML 29 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Variable Interest Entities
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2017
Organization Consolidation And Presentation Of Financial Statements [Abstract]  
Variable Interest Entities

NOTE 8 — VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

Collateralized Loan Obligation Funds - Closed

The Company, through its subsidiary TCA, acted as the asset manager or provided certain middle and back office staffing and services to the asset manager of various CLO funds. TCA earned asset management fees in accordance with the terms of its asset management or staffing and services agreements associated with the CLO funds. TCA earned asset management fees totaling $1,717,000, $6,574,000, and $5,646,000 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015. On March 31, 2017, the Company sold its membership interests in TCA as discussed in Note 2 – Business Combinations and Divestitures. As a result of the TCA sale, as of March 31, 2017 the Company no longer acts as asset manager or staffing and services provider for any CLO funds.

The Company holds investments in the subordinated notes of the following closed CLO funds:

 

Offering

 

Offering

 

(Dollars in thousands)

Date

 

Amount

 

Trinitas CLO IV, LTD (Trinitas IV)

June 2, 2016

 

$

406,650

 

Trinitas CLO V, LTD (Trinitas V)

September 22, 2016

 

$

409,000

 

Trinitas CLO VI, LTD (Trinitas VI)

June 20, 2017

 

$

717,100

 

 

The carrying amounts of the Company’s investments in the subordinated notes of the CLO funds, which represent the Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with the CLO funds, totaled $8,557,000 and $3,380,000 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and are classified as held to maturity securities within the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

The Company performed a consolidation analysis to confirm whether the Company was required to consolidate the assets, liabilities, equity or operations of the closed CLO funds in its financial statements. The Company concluded that the closed CLO funds are variable interest entities and that the Company holds variable interests in the entities in the form of its investments in the subordinated notes of the entities. However, the Company also concluded that the Company does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entities’ economic performance. As a result, the Company is not the primary beneficiary and therefore is not required to consolidate the assets, liabilities, equity or operations of the CLO funds in the Company’s financial statements.

Collateralized Loan Obligation Funds – Warehouse Phase

From time to time, the Company may invest in the subordinated debt of entities formed to be the issuers of CLO offerings during their warehouse phases. The Company’s investments in these CLO funds are repaid when the CLO funds’ warehouse phases are closed and the CLO offerings are issued. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with these CLO funds is limited to the carrying amount of its investments in the subordinated debt of the CLO funds.

At December 31, 2017, the Company did not hold any investments in the subordinated debt of CLO funds during their warehouse phase. At December 31, 2016, the Company held an investment of $21,217,000 in the subordinated debt of a CLO fund during its warehouse phase, which was classified as other assets within the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. Income from the Company’s investments in CLO warehouse entities totaled $2,226,000, $3,184,000, and $1,151,000 during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively, and is included in other noninterest income within the Company’s consolidated statements of income.

The Company performed a consolidation analysis of CLO funds during their warehouse phases and concluded that the CLO funds were variable interest entities and that the Company held a variable interest in the entities that could potentially be significant to the entities in the form of its investments in the subordinated notes of the entities. However, the Company also concluded that the Company did not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entities’ economic performance.  As a result, the Company was not the primary beneficiary and therefore was not required to consolidate the assets, liabilities, equity, or operations of the entities in the Company’s financial statements.