Commitments and Contingencies	6 Months Ended
Commitments and Contingencies	Jun. 30, 2022
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Commitments and Contingencies	Commitments and Contingencies Purchase Obligations In the ordinary course of business, the Company issues purchase orders based on its current manufacturing needs. As of June 30, 2022, the Company had non-cancelable purchase commitments of $226.5 million, of which $175.8 million are expected to be paid within the year ending December 31, 2022. Ransomware Incident On May 4, 2022, the Company determined that certain of its information technology systems were affected by ransomware impacting certain internal systems. Upon detecting the security event, the Company took immediate steps designed to contain the incident and implement its business continuity plans to restore and support continued operations. The Company has contained the incident and restored substantially all of its critical information technology systems. During the three months ended June 30, 2022, the Company incurred $12.5 million of expenses related to the ransomware incident, partially offset by $11.1 million of expected insurance recoveries. Expenses include costs to investigate and remediate the ransomware incident, as well as legal and other professional services, all of which were expensed as incurred. For the three months ended June 30, 2022, the Company included net expenses of $0.2 million in cost of revenues and $1.2 million in selling, general, and administrative expenses in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Legal Proceedings The Company is currently involved in various legal proceedings. A class action lawsuit was filed against the Company, on June 5, 2019, in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, Chancery Division, captioned Corey Heard, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Omnicell, Inc., Case No. 2019-CH-06817 (the “Heard Action”). The complaint seeks class certification, monetary damages in the form of statutory damages for willful and/or reckless or, in the alternative, negligent violation of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (“BIPA”), and certain declaratory, injunctive, and other relief based on causes of action directed to allegations of violation of BIPA by the Company. The complaint was served on the Company on June 13, 2019. On July 31, 2019, the Company filed a motion to stay or consolidate the case with the action Yana Mazya, et al. v. Northwestern Lake Forest Hospital, et al., Case No. 2018-CH-07161, pending in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, Chancery Division (the “Mazya Action”). The Court subsequently, on October 10, 2019, denied the motion, without prejudice, as being moot in view of the dismissal of the claims against the Company in the Mazya Action. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint in the Heard Action on October 31, 2019. The hearing on the Company’s motion to dismiss was held on September 2, 2020. The Court ruled from the bench and dismissed the complaint without prejudice giving plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint by September 30, 2020. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on September 30, 2020 and the Company subsequently filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on October 28, 2020, which was fully briefed, but the Court had not heard oral argument on the motion. The parties entered into a settlement agreement on January 25, 2022. On February 1, 2022, the Court granted preliminary approval of the settlement. The Court has scheduled an interim status conference for September 2, 2022. Subject to final approval of the settlement, the Company intends to defend the lawsuit vigorously. On December 21, 2020, Becton, Dickinson and Company (“BD”) filed a complaint against the Company in the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, asserting claims of misappropriation under the Defend Trade Secrets Act, misappropriation under the North Carolina Trade Secrets Protection Act, unfair competition, and unfair/deceptive trade practices in violation of North Carolina law (the “BD Complaint”). This action (the “BD Action”) was commenced in relation to another action brought by BD, in the same Court (the “Related Matter”) against a former BD employee who is also a former Company employee (the “Former Employee”) alleging that the Former Employee had violated the Former Employee’s legal obligations to BD regarding BD’s confidential and trade secret information when the Former Employee allegedly downloaded certain documents from BD’s information technology system following the end of the Former Employee’s employment with BD. In connection with the Related Matter, BD, the Former Employee, and the Company entered into a protocol with the purpose of facilitating the return to BD of any BD documents that may have been resident, as a result of the Former Employee’s actions, on any devices belonging to the Former Employee or the Company. The BD Complaint seeks injunctive relief and monetary damages in the form of compensatory, punitive, and exemplary damages, attorneys’ fees and costs, and pre-judgment and post-judgment interest. On March 8, 2022, the parties entered into a confidential settlement agreement. On May 23, 2022, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss the case with prejudice. On May 24, 2022, the case was dismissed with prejudice. As required under ASC 450, Contingencies, the Company accrues for contingencies when it believes that a loss is probable and that it can reasonably estimate the amount of any such loss. The Company has not recorded any material accrual for contingent liabilities associated with the legal proceedings described above based on its belief that any potential material loss, while reasonably possible, is not probable. Further, any possible range of loss in these matters cannot be reasonably estimated at this time or is not deemed material. The Company believes that it has valid defenses with respect to these legal proceedings pending against it. However, litigation is inherently unpredictable, and it is possible that cash flows or results of operations could be materially affected in any particular period by the unfavorable resolution of any of these legal proceedings or because of the diversion of management’s attention and the creation of significant expenses.