-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----
Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR
Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov
Originator-Key-Asymmetric:
 MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen
 TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB
MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA,
 LJLvimuonwr7wRtE8wa0adgjN+Lgvd3s0CxdROINYX5hbBk1MIRNcIiI3eI7d8me
 QwIdCe5Y/4YqoRNc8ll0fA==

<SEC-DOCUMENT>0000899681-05-000313.txt : 20050415
<SEC-HEADER>0000899681-05-000313.hdr.sgml : 20050415
<ACCEPTANCE-DATETIME>20050415163149
ACCESSION NUMBER:		0000899681-05-000313
CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE:	10-K
PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT:		7
CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT:	20041231
FILED AS OF DATE:		20050415
DATE AS OF CHANGE:		20050415

FILER:

	COMPANY DATA:	
		COMPANY CONFORMED NAME:			SYSTEMAX INC
		CENTRAL INDEX KEY:			0000945114
		STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION:	RETAIL-CATALOG & MAIL-ORDER HOUSES [5961]
		IRS NUMBER:				113262067
		STATE OF INCORPORATION:			DE
		FISCAL YEAR END:			1231

	FILING VALUES:
		FORM TYPE:		10-K
		SEC ACT:		1934 Act
		SEC FILE NUMBER:	001-13792
		FILM NUMBER:		05754043

	BUSINESS ADDRESS:	
		STREET 1:		22 HARBOR PARK DR
		CITY:			PORT WASHINGTON
		STATE:			NY
		ZIP:			11050
		BUSINESS PHONE:		5166087000

	MAIL ADDRESS:	
		STREET 1:		22 HARBOR PARK DRIVE
		CITY:			PORT WASHINGTON
		STATE:			NY
		ZIP:			11050

	FORMER COMPANY:	
		FORMER CONFORMED NAME:	GLOBAL DIRECTMAIL CORP
		DATE OF NAME CHANGE:	19950509
</SEC-HEADER>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>10-K
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>systemax-10k_041405.htm
<TEXT>
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>FORM 10-K</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<HR SIZE=1 NOSHADE>
<HR SIZE=1 NOSHADE>

<P ALIGN=CENTER><FONT SIZE=5><B>SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION</B></FONT><BR>
<FONT SIZE=3><B><U>WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549</U></B></FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=CENTER><FONT SIZE=4><B>FORM 10-K</B></FONT></P>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=100%>(Mark One)</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>[ <B>X</B> ]</TD>
<TD WIDTH=90% ALIGN=CENTER>
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE<BR>
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934<BR>
<B>For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004</B>
</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<P ALIGN=CENTER><FONT SIZE=3>or</FONT></P>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;]</TD>
<TD WIDTH=90% ALIGN=CENTER>
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE<BR>
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934<BR>
For the transition period from&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;to
</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<P ALIGN=CENTER><FONT SIZE=3>Commission File Number:<BR>
1-13792</FONT></P>

<HR SIZE=1 NOSHADE WIDTH=25% ALIGN=CENTER>

<P ALIGN=CENTER><FONT SIZE=4><B>Systemax Inc.</B></FONT><BR>
<FONT SIZE=3>(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)</FONT></P>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=50% ALIGN=CENTER>
<B>Delaware</B><BR>
(State or other jurisdiction of<BR>
incorporation or organization)
</TD>
<TD WIDTH=50% ALIGN=CENTER>
<B>11-3262067</B><BR>
(I.R.S. Employer<BR>
Identification No.)
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=50% ALIGN=CENTER>
<B>11 Harbor Park Drive<BR>
Port Washington, New York</B><BR>
(Address of principal executive offices)
</TD>
<TD WIDTH=50% ALIGN=CENTER>
<BR>
<B>11050</B><BR>
(Zip Code)
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<P ALIGN=CENTER><FONT SIZE=3><B>Registrant's telephone number, including area
code: (516) 608-7000</B></FONT></P>

<HR SIZE=1 NOSHADE WIDTH=25% ALIGN=CENTER>

<P ALIGN=CENTER><FONT SIZE=3><B>Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b)
of the Act:</B></FONT></P>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=50% ALIGN=CENTER>
<BR>
<B><U>Title of each class</U></B><BR>
Common Stock, par value $ .01 per share
</TD>
<TD WIDTH=50% ALIGN=CENTER>
<B>Name of each exchange on<BR>
<U>which registered</U></B><BR>
New York Stock Exchange
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<P ALIGN=CENTER><FONT SIZE=3><B>Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g)
of the Act: NONE</B></FONT></P>

<HR SIZE=1 NOSHADE WIDTH=25% ALIGN=CENTER>


<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ] </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best knowledge of the registrant, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment of this
Form 10-K. [X]</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes [ ] No [X]</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
registrant as of June 30, 2004, which is the last business day of the
registrant&#146;s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was
approximately $64,416,000. For purposes of this computation, all executive
officers and directors of the Registrant and all parties to the Stockholders
Agreement dated as of June 15, 1995 have been deemed to be affiliates. Such
determination should not be deemed to be an admission that such persons are, in
fact, affiliates of the Registrant.</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant's common stock as of March
31, 2005 was 34,682,718 shares.</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Documents incorporated by reference: Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement
of Systemax Inc. relating to the 2005 annual meeting of stockholders are
incorporated by reference in Part III hereof. </FONT></P>

<HR SIZE=1 NOSHADE>
<HR SIZE=1 NOSHADE>


<PAGE>

<P ALIGN=CENTER><FONT SIZE=3><B><U>TABLE OF CONTENTS</U></B></FONT></P>

<PRE>
Part I
  Item 1.  Business........................................................................2
               General.....................................................................2
               Available Information ......................................................2
               Recent Developments.........................................................3
               Products....................................................................4
               Sales and Marketing.........................................................5
               Customer Service and Support................................................6
               Sales and Distribution Centers..............................................7
               Suppliers...................................................................7
               Research and Development....................................................7
               Competition and Other Market Factors........................................7
               Employees...................................................................8
               Environmental Matters.......................................................8
               Financial Information About Foreign and Domestic Operations.................9

  Item 2.  Properties.....................................................................10
  Item 3.  Legal Proceedings..............................................................10
  Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders............................10

Part II
  Item 5.  Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters..........11
  Item 6.  Selected Financial Data........................................................12
  Item 7.  Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
           Operations.....................................................................13
  Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.....................27
  Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data ...................................28
  Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial
           Disclosure.....................................................................28
  Item 9A. Controls and Procedures........................................................28

Part III
  Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.............................30
  Item 11. Executive Compensation.........................................................30
  Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
           Stockholder Matters............................................................30
  Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.................................30
  Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.........................................31

Part IV
  Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K................31

           Signatures.....................................................................35

</PRE>

<PAGE>

<P ALIGN=CENTER><FONT SIZE=3><B>PART I</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
<I>Unless otherwise indicated, all references herein to Systemax Inc. (sometimes
referred to as &quot;Systemax&quot;, the &quot;Company&quot; or &#147;we&#148;)
include its subsidiaries.</I></FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3><B><I>Forward Looking Statements</I></B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
<I>This report contains forward looking statements within the meaning of that
term in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).
Additional written or oral forward looking statements may be made by the Company
from time to time, in filings with the Securities Exchange Commission or
otherwise. Statements contained in this report that are not historical facts are
forward looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward looking statements may
include, but are not limited to, projections of revenue, income or loss and
capital expenditures, statements regarding future operations, financing needs,
compliance with financial covenants in loan agreements, plans for acquisition or
sale of assets or businesses and consolidation of operations of newly acquired
businesses, and plans relating to products or services of the Company,
assessments of materiality, predictions of future events and the effects of
pending and possible litigation, as well as assumptions relating to the
foregoing. In addition, when used in this discussion, the words
&#147;anticipates,&#148; &#147;believes,&#148; &#147;estimates,&#148;
&#147;expects,&#148; &#147;intends,&#148; &#147;plans&#148; and variations
thereof and similar expressions are intended to identify forward looking
statements.</I></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
<I>Forward looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties,
some of which cannot be predicted or quantified based on current expectations.
Consequently, future events and results could differ materially from those set
forth in, contemplated by, or underlying the forward looking statements
contained in this report. Statements in this report, particularly in &#147;Item
1. Business,&#148; &#147;Item 3. Legal Proceedings,&#148; &#147;Item 7.
Management&#146;s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations,&#148; and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements describe
certain factors, among others, that could contribute to or cause such
differences.</I> </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Item 1. Business.</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>General</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Systemax is a direct marketer of brand name and private label products,
including personal desktop computers (&#147;PCs&#148;), notebook computers,
computer related products and industrial products, in North America and Europe.
We assemble our own PCs and sell them under the trademarks
<I>Systemax&#153;</I>, <I>Tiger&#174;</I> and
<I>Ultra&#153;</I>. In addition, we market and sell computers manufactured by
other leading companies. We offer our customers a broad selection of products,
prompt order fulfillment and extensive customer service. During 2004 we also
began to market our ProfitCenter Software<I>&#153;</I> suite of on-demand,
web-based software applications. Computers and computer related products
accounted for 92% of our net sales in 2004. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
The Company was incorporated in Delaware in 1995. Certain predecessor businesses
which now constitute part of the Company have been in business since 1955. Our
headquarters office is located at 11 Harbor Park Drive, Port Washington, New
York. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Available Information</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
We maintain an internet web site at <U>www.systemax.com</U>. We file reports
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (&#147;SEC&#148;) and make available
free of charge on or through this web site our annual reports on Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, including all
amendments to those reports. These are available as soon as is reasonably
practicable after they are filed with the SEC. All reports mentioned above are
also available from the SEC&#146;s web site (<U>www.sec.gov</U>). The
information on our web site is not part of this or any other report we file
with, or furnish to, the SEC. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Our Board of Directors has adopted the following corporate governance documents
with respect to the Company (the &#147;Corporate Governance Documents&#148;):
</FONT></P>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&#149;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=90%>Corporate Ethics Policy for officers, directors and employees</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&#149;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=90%>Charter for the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&#149;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=90%>Charter for the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&#149;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=90%>Charter for the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee of the
Board of Directors</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
In accordance with the corporate governance rules of the New York Stock
Exchange, each of the Corporate Governance Documents is available on our Company
web site (www.systemax.com) or can be obtained by writing to Systemax Inc.,
Attention: Board of Directors (Corporate Governance), 11 Harbor Park Drive, Port
Washington, NY 11050. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Recent Developments</B></FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3><I>Company Extends United States Credit Facility</I></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
On March 17, 2005, we extended the maturity date of our $70 million revolving
credit facility agreement with JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and other lenders from
March 31, 2005 to September 30, 2006 under substantially the same terms and
conditions. </FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3><I>Restatement of Financial Statements</I></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
On February 21, 2004, we announced that we would restate our previously issued
consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003 and the
first three quarters of fiscal 2004, following the discovery of certain errors
in accounting for inventory at our United Kingdom subsidiary. In connection with
this restatement, the Company filed an amended Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003 with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2005.
The consolidated financial statements included herein and all related
information for the periods affected have been restated to reflect the
corrections. </FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3><I>Employment and Restricted Stock Unit Agreements</I></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
On October 12, 2004, we entered into an employment agreement with Gilbert
Fiorentino, the Chief Executive Officer of our subsidiary, Tiger Direct, Inc.,
and a director of the Company. The agreement became effective as of June 1, 2004
and expires on December 31, 2013 unless terminated sooner under the terms of the
agreement. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
The agreement provides for annual compensation and bonus payments. The agreement
also accelerates the vesting schedule of certain options previously granted to
Mr. Fiorentino. In addition, new options were granted under the Company's 1999
Long-term Stock Incentive Plan (the &#147;1999 Plan&#148;) for 166,667 shares,
and the agreement obligates the Company to issue additional options of 166,667
shares in each of August 2005 and 2006, at the then fair market value. Options
will vest in five annual cumulative installments of 20% each. </FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Mr. Fiorentino also was granted, pursuant to a restricted stock unit agreement,
restricted stock units under the 1999 Plan representing the right to receive a
total of 1,000,000 shares of restricted stock of the Company. The grant is
conditioned upon shareholder approval at the 2005 annual meeting and
satisfaction of certain performance conditions based on earnings before
interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization expense in fiscal 2004, which
have been met. Such restricted stock units generally vest at the rate of 20% on
May 31, 2005 and 10% per year on April 1, 2006 and each year thereafter.</FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3><I>Restructuring Activities</I></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
We continue to address the pressures of a competitive market with the
identification of opportunities for cost savings. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
In February 2004 we announced a plan to streamline the back office and warehouse
operations of our computer businesses in the United States. The streamlining,
which resulted in the elimination of approximately 200 jobs resulted in
approximately $3.7 million (pre-tax) of severance and other restructuring costs
which were reflected in our first quarter 2004 results. We expect that this
streamlining plan will result in annual savings of approximately $8 million,
excluding the severance and other restructuring costs recognized in fiscal 2004.
</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
During 2004 we implemented several cost reduction plans in Europe, including a
consolidation of our United Kingdom sales offices in the first quarter of 2004,
resulting in the elimination of 50 jobs. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
In early 2005, we announced that we are taking steps to increase the efficiency
and profitability of our European operations, including combining certain back
office operations in the United Kingdom to provide better customer service and
reduce costs. These actions will result in the elimination of approximately 185
positions, which is expected to result in approximately $8.0 million in annual
savings. </FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3><I>Rebate Program Use Investigated</I></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
On August 10, 2004 we announced that we were cooperating in an investigation by
the United States Attorney&#146;s Office for the Southern District of Florida of
one or more government employees and certain former employees of the Company of
possible misuse of certain previously terminated rebate programs offered by the
Company&#146;s Dartek subsidiary. The Government has informed the Company that
it is not a subject of the investigation at this time. The Audit Committee
conducted a review of the aforementioned terminated rebate programs, including
their potential violations of Company policies, and has reviewed other similar
programs offered by the Company. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Products</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
We offer more than 100,000 brand name and private label products. We endeavor to
expand and keep current the breadth of our product offerings in order to fulfill
the increasingly wide range of product needs of our customers. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Computer sales include Systemax PCs complemented by offerings of other brand
name PCs and notebook computers. Our computer related products include supplies
such as laser printer toner cartridges and ink jet printer cartridges; media
such as recordable disks and magnetic tape cartridges; peripherals such as hard
disks, CD-ROM and DVD drives, printers and scanners; memory upgrades; data
communication and networking equipment; monitors; digital cameras; plasma TVs
and packaged software. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
We assemble our Systemax brand PCs in our 297,000 square foot,
ISO-9000-certified facility in Fletcher, Ohio. We purchase components and
subassemblies from suppliers in the United States as well as overseas. Certain
parts and components for our PCs are obtained from a limited group of suppliers.
We also utilize licensed technology and computer software in the assembly of our
PCs. For a discussion of risks associated with these licenses and suppliers, see
Item 7, &#147;Management&#146;s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations &#150; Factors That May Affect Future Results and
Financial Condition.&#148; </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Our industrial products include storage equipment such as metal shelving, bins
and lockers; light material handling equipment such as hand carts and hand
trucks; furniture, small office machines and related supplies; and consumable
industrial products such as first aid items, safety items, protective clothing
and OSHA compliance items. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
We began to market our ProfitCenter Software<I>&#153;</I> suite of applications
in 2004. ProfitCenter Software<I>&#153; </I>is a web-based application which is
delivered as an on-demand service over the internet. The product helps companies
automate and manage their entire customer life-cycle across multiple sales
channels (internet, call center, outside salespersons, etc.). </FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
The table below summarizes our mix of sales by product category:</FONT></P>


<PRE>
     <U>Product Type - Years Ended December 31 <I>(Percentage of net sales)</I></U>

                                                                      <B>2004</B>    2003     2002
                                                                      ----    ----     ----
     Computer and Computer Related Products  ....................      <B>92%</B>     91%      90%
     Industrial Products ........................................       <B>8</B>       9%      10%
                                                                        -      --       --
     Total  .....................................................     <B>100%</B>    100%     100%
                                                                      ===     ===      ===
</PRE>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Sales and Marketing</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;We
market our products to both business customers and individual consumers. Our
business customers include large businesses (customers with more than 1,000
employees), small and mid-sized businesses (customers with 20 to 1,000
employees), educational organizations and government entities. We have invested
consistently and aggressively in developing a proprietary customer and prospect
database. We consider our business customers to be the various individuals who
work within an organization rather than the business location itself. The
business customer and prospect database includes detailed information, including
company size, number of employees, industry, various demographic and geographic
characteristics and purchasing history. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
We have established an integrated three-pronged system of direct marketing to
business customers, consisting of relationship marketers, catalog mailings and
propriety internet web sites, designed to maximize sales. Our relationship
marketers focus their efforts on our business customers by establishing a
personal relationship between such customers and a Systemax account manager. The
goal of the relationship marketing sales force is to increase the purchasing
productivity of current customers and to actively solicit newly targeted
prospects to become customers. With access to the records we maintain of
historical purchasing patterns, our relationship marketers are prompted with
product suggestions to expand customer order values. In the United States, we
also have the ability to provide such customers with electronic data interchange
(&#147;EDI&#148;) ordering and customized billing services, customer savings
reports and stocking of specialty items specifically requested by these
customers. Our relationship marketers&#146; efforts are supported by frequent
catalog mailings and e-mail campaigns designed to generate inbound telephone
sales, and our interactive websites, which allow customers to purchase products
directly over the Internet. We believe that the integration of these three
marketing methods enables us to more thoroughly penetrate our business and
government customer base. Increased internet exposure can lead to more
internet&#150;related sales and can also generate more inbound telephone sales;
just as catalog mailings which feature our websites can result in greater
internet-related sales. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Our sales growth continues to be supported by strong growth in sales to
individual consumers, particularly through e-commerce means. To reach our
consumer audience, we use methods such as website campaigns, banner ads and
e-mail campaigns. We are able to monitor and evaluate the results of our various
advertising campaigns to enable us to execute them in a cost-effective manner.
We combine our use of e-commerce initiatives with catalog mailings, which
generate calls to inbound sales representatives. These sales representatives use
our information systems to fulfill orders and explore additional customer
product needs. Sales to consumers are generally fulfilled from our own stock,
requiring us to carry more inventory than we would for our business customers.
We also periodically take advantage of attractive product pricing by making
opportunistic bulk inventory purchases with the objective of turning them
quickly into sales. We have also successfully increased our sales to individual
consumers by using retail outlet stores. We currently have six such retail
locations in North America, which are located in or near one of our existing
sales and distribution centers, thereby minimizing our operating costs. We
presently plan to add two more in 2005. </FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
<B><I>Catalogs</I></B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
We currently produce a total of 22 full-line and targeted specialty catalogs in
North America and Europe under distinct titles. Our portfolio of catalogs
includes such established brand names as <I>TigerDirect.com&#153;, Global
Computer Supplies&#153;, Misco&#174;, HCS Misco&#153;, Global Industrial,
ArrowStar&#153; and 06&#153;.</I> Full-line computer product catalogs offer
products such as PCs, notebooks, peripherals, computer components, magnetic
media, data communication, networking and power protection equipment, ergonomic
accessories, furniture and software. Full-line industrial product catalogs offer
products such as material handling products and industrial supplies. Specialty
catalogs contain more focused product offerings and are targeted to individuals
most likely to purchase from such catalogs. We mail catalogs to both businesses
and consumers. In the case of business mailings, we mail our catalogs to many
individuals at a single business location, providing us with multiple
points-of-entry. Our in-house staff designs all of our catalogs. In-house
catalog production helps reduce overall catalog expense and shortens catalog
production time. This allows us the flexibility to alter our product offerings
and pricing and to refine our catalog formats more quickly. Our catalogs are
printed by third parties under fixed pricing arrangements. The commonality of
certain core pages of our catalogs also allows for economies in catalog
production. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
During 2004, we distributed approximately 88 million catalogs, which was 9%
fewer than in the prior year. We mailed approximately 50 million catalogs in
North America and approximately 38 million catalogs were distributed in Europe.
</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
<B><I>E-commerce</I></B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
The worldwide growth in active internet users has made e-commerce a significant
opportunity for growth. In 2004 we had approximately $515 million in
internet-related sales, an increase of $131 million, or 34%, from 2003.
E-commerce sales now represent 26.7% of total revenue, compared to 23.2% in
2003. The increase in our internet sales enables us to leverage our advertising
spending, allowing us to reduce our printed catalog costs while maintaining
customer contact. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
We currently operate multiple e-commerce sites, including
<I><U>www.systemaxpc.com</U></I>,
<I><U>www.tigerdirect.com, www.globalcomputer.com</U></I>,
<I><U>www.misco.co.uk</U></I>, <I><U>www.hcsmisco.fr</U>,
www.misco.de</I> and <I><U>www.globalindustrial.com</U></I> and we continually
upgrade the capabilities and performance of these web sites. Our internet sites
feature on-line catalogs of thousands of products, allowing us to offer a wider
variety of computer and industrial products than our printed catalogs. Our
customers have around-the-clock, on-line access to purchase products and we have
the ability to create targeted promotions for our customers&#146; interests.
Many of our internet sites also permit customers to purchase &#147;build to
order&#148; PCs configured to their own specifications. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Customer Service and Support</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
We generally provide toll-free telephone number access to our customers. Certain
of our domestic call centers are linked to provide telephone backup in the event
of a disruption in phone service. In addition to telephone orders, we also
receive orders by mail, fax, electronic data interchange and on the internet.
</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Orders are fulfilled on a timely basis and are generally shipped by United
Parcel Service in the United States and by similar national small package
delivery services in Europe, as well as by various freight lines and local
carriers. Many customers receive their orders (other than custom items, large
furniture and large industrial items shipped directly by the vendor) within one
or two business days of the order date as a result of the locations of our
distribution centers. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
We provide extensive technical telephone support to our Systemax brand PC
customers. We maintain a database of commonly asked questions for our technical
support representatives, enabling them to respond quickly to similar questions.
We conduct regular on-site training seminars for our sales representatives to
help ensure that they are well trained and informed regarding our latest product
offerings. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Sales and Distribution Centers</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
A large number of our products are carried in stock, and orders for such
products are fulfilled directly from our distribution centers, typically on the
day the order is received. We operate out of multiple sales and distribution
facilities in North America and Europe. The locations of our distribution
centers allow next day or second day delivery via low cost ground carriers
throughout most of the United States, Canada and Western Europe. The locations
of our distribution centers in Europe have enabled us to market into four
additional countries with limited incremental investment. We maintain
relationships with a number of large distributors in the North America and
Europe that also deliver products directly to our customers. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Suppliers</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
We purchase the majority of our products and components directly from
manufacturers and large wholesale distributors. For the year ended December 31,
2004, Tech Data Corporation accounted for 12.2% and Ingram Micro Inc. accounted
for 10.4% of our purchases. For the year ended December 31, 2003, Tech Data
Corporation accounted for 14.7% and Ingram Micro Inc. accounted for 10.3% of our
purchases. For the year ended December 31, 2002, Tech Data Corporation accounted
for 14.7% of our purchases. The loss of either of these vendors, or any other
key vendors, could have an adverse effect on us. </FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Certain private label products are manufactured by third parties to our
specifications. Many of these private label products have been designed or
developed by our in-house research and development teams. See "Research and
Development."</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Research and Development</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Our research and development teams design and develop products for our private
label offerings. The individuals responsible for research and development have
backgrounds in engineering and industrial design. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
This in-house capability provides important support to the private label
offerings. Products designed include PCs, servers, furniture, ergonomic monitor
support arms, printer and monitor stands, power supplies and other durable
computer related products, storage racks and shelving systems, various stock and
storage carts, work benches, plastic bins and shop furniture. We own the tooling
for many of these products, including plastic bins, computer accessories,
furniture and metal alloy monitor arms. See &#147;Research and Development
Costs&#148; in Footnote 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further
information. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Competition and Other Market Factors</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
<I><B>Personal Computers and Computer Related Products</B></I></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
The North American and European computer markets are highly competitive, with
many U.S., Asian and European companies vying for market share. There are few
barriers of entry to the PC market, with PCs being sold through the direct
market channel, mass merchants, over the internet and by computer and office
supply superstores. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Timely introduction of new products or product features are critical elements to
remaining competitive in the PC market. Other competitive factors include
product performance, quality and reliability, technical support and customer
service, marketing and distribution and price. Some of our competitors have
stronger brand-recognition, broader product lines and greater financial,
marketing, manufacturing and technological resources than us. Additionally, our
results could also be adversely affected should we be unable to maintain our
technological and marketing arrangements with other companies, such as
Microsoft&#174;, Intel&#174; and Advanced Micro Devices&#174;. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
The North American computer related products market is highly fragmented and
characterized by multiple channels of distribution including direct marketers,
local and national retail computer stores, computer resellers, mass merchants,
computer and office supply &quot;superstores&quot; and internet-based resellers.
In Europe, our major competitors are regional or country-specific retail and
direct-mail distribution companies and internet-based resellers. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
With conditions in the market for computer related products remaining highly
competitive, continued reductions in retail prices may adversely affect our
revenues and profits. Additionally, we rely in part upon the introduction of new
technologies and products by other manufacturers in order to sustain long-term
sales growth and profitability. There is no assurance that the rapid rate of
such technological advances and product development will continue. </FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
<B><I>Industrial Products</I></B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
The market for the sale of industrial products in North America is highly
fragmented and is characterized by multiple distribution channels such as retail
outlets, small dealerships, direct mail distribution, internet-based resellers
and large warehouse stores. We also face competition from manufacturers' own
sales representatives, who sell industrial equipment directly to customers, and
from regional or local distributors. Many high volume purchasers, however,
utilize catalog distributors as their first source of product. In the industrial
products market, customer purchasing decisions are primarily based on price,
product selection, product availability, level of service and convenience. We
believe that direct marketing via catalog, the internet and sales
representatives is an effective and convenient distribution method to reach
mid-sized facilities that place many small orders and require a wide selection
of products. In addition, because the industrial products market is highly
fragmented and generally less brand oriented, it is well suited to private label
products. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Employees</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
As of December 31, 2004, we employed a total of 3,070 employees, including 2,960
full-time and 110 part-time employees, of whom 1,760 were in North America and
1,310 were in Europe. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Environmental Matters</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Under various national, state and local environmental laws and regulations in
North America and Europe, a current or previous owner or operator (including the
lessee) of real property may become liable for the costs of removal or
remediation of hazardous substances at such real property. Such laws and
regulations often impose liability without regard to fault. We lease most of our
facilities. In connection with such leases, we could be held liable for the
costs of removal or remedial actions with respect to hazardous substances.
Although we have not been notified of, and are not otherwise aware of, any
material environmental liability, claim or non-compliance, there can be no
assurance that we will not be required to incur remediation or other costs in
connection with environmental matters in the future. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Financial Information About Foreign and Domestic
Operations</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>We conduct our business in North America (the United States and
Canada) and Europe. The following sets forth our operations in those two
geographic markets (in thousands): </FONT></P>

<PRE>
                                            <B>Europe              North America       Total</B>
     <B>2004
     -----
     Net sales                              $696,249            $1,231,586          $1,927,835
     Income (loss) from operations          $(12,489)              $35,405             $22,916
     Identifiable assets                    $170,218              $314,082            $484,300</B>

     2003
     -----
     Net sales                              $631,545            $1,026,233          $1,657,778
     Income (loss) from operations          $(5,243)               $14,530              $9,287
     Identifiable assets                    $140,126              $306,593            $446,719

     2002
     -----
     Net sales                              $587,712              $963,805          $1,551,517
     Income (loss) from operations            $7,823             $(15,604)            $(7,781)
     Identifiable assets                    $130,651              $307,253            $437,904

</PRE>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Item 2. Properties.</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Our primary facilities, which are leased except where otherwise
indicated, are as follows: </FONT></P>

<PRE><FONT SIZE=1>
<B>                                                                                Approximate    Expiration
Facility                                          Location                      Square Feet     of Lease
- --------                                          --------                      -----------     --------</B>

Headquarters, Sales and Distribution Center (1)   Port Washington, NY                86,000        2007
Sales and Distribution Center                     Suwanee, GA                       361,000       Owned
Sales and Distribution Center                     Naperville, IL                    241,000        2010
PC Assembly, Sales and Distribution Center        Fletcher, OH                      297,000       Owned
Sales and Administrative Center                   Miami, FL                          71,000        2010
Distribution Center                               Las Vegas, NV                      90,000        2010
Sales and Distribution Center                     Markham, Ontario                   22,000        2013
Sales and Distribution Center                     Verrieres le Buisson, France       48,000        2007
Sales and Distribution Center                     Frankfurt, Germany                 92,000        2013
Sales and Distribution Center                     Madrid, Spain                      38,000        (2)
Sales and Distribution Center                     Milan, Italy                      102,000        2009
Sales and Distribution Center                     Greenock, Scotland                 78,000       Owned
European Headquarters and Sales Center            Wellingborough, England            75,000       Owned
Sales Center                                      Amstelveen, Netherlands            21,000        2007
Sales and Distribution Center                     Lidkoping, Sweden                  20,000        2005
</FONT>
</PRE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>(1)</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>For information about this facility, leased from related parties,
see Item 13 --"Certain Relationships and Related Transactions"</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5% ALIGN=LEFT>(2)</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>Terminable upon two months prior written notice.</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;We
also lease space for other, smaller offices and retail stores in the United
States, Canada and Europe and certain additional facilities leased by the
Company are subleased to others. For further information regarding our lease
obligations, see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Item 3. Legal Proceedings.</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Systemax is a party to various pending legal proceedings and disputes arising in
the normal course of business, including those involving commercial, employment,
tax and intellectual property related claims, none of which, in
management&#146;s opinion, is anticipated to have a material adverse effect on
our consolidated financial statements. </FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3><B>Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of
Security Holders.</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
During the quarter ended December 31, 2004, there were no matters submitted to a
vote of the Company's security holders. </FONT></P>

<PAGE>

<P ALIGN=CENTER><FONT SIZE=3><B>PART II</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related
Stockholder Matters.</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Systemax common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
&quot;SYX&quot;. The following table sets forth the high and low closing sales
price of our common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange for the
periods indicated. </FONT></P>

<PRE>
<FONT SIZE=1>
<B>     2004                                                         High       Low
     ----                                                         ----       ---

     First quarter.............................................  $7.95    $ 4.88
     Second quarter............................................   6.70      5.01
     Third quarter.............................................   6.68      5.32
     Fourth quarter............................................   7.34      5.65</B>

     2003                                                         High       Low
     ----                                                         ----       ---
     First quarter.............................................  $1.99    $ 1.29
     Second quarter............................................   4.28      1.95
     Third quarter.............................................   8.45      3.47
     Fourth quarter............................................   7.78      6.49
</FONT>
</PRE>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
On April 14, 2005, the last reported sale price of our common stock on the New
York Stock Exchange was $6.92 per share. As of April 14, 2005, we had 240
shareholders of record. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
We have not paid any dividends since our initial public offering and anticipate
that all of our cash provided by operations in the foreseeable future will be
retained for the development and expansion of our business, and therefore do not
anticipate paying dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.
</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Item 6. Selected Financial Data.</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
The following selected financial information is qualified by reference to, and
should be read in conjunction with, the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements and the notes thereto, and &quot;Management's Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations&quot; contained elsewhere in
this report. The selected statement of operations data for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and the selected balance sheet data as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003 is derived from the audited consolidated financial
statements which are included elsewhere in this report. The selected balance
sheet data as of December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 and the selected statement of
operations data for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 is derived from
the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company which are not
included in this report. </FONT></P>

<PRE>
<FONT SIZE=1>
                                                <B>Years Ended December 31
                                                -----------------------</B>
                             (In  millions, except per common share data and number of catalog titles)

                                                             --------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                <B>2004</B>         2003         2002         2001        2000
                                                             --------------------------------------------------------------
<B>Statement of Operations Data:
- ----------------------------</B>
Net sales                                                     <B>$1,927.8</B>     $1,657.8     $1,551.5     $1,547.0    $1,686.1
Gross profit                                                    <B>$290.4</B>       $265.0       $265.6       $276.9      $209.9
Selling, general &amp; administrative expenses                      <B>$260.1</B>       $251.5       $256.1       $271.6      $270.9
Restructuring and other charges                                   <B>$7.4</B>         $1.7        $17.3         $2.8
Income (loss) from operations                                    <B>$22.9</B>         $9.3       $(7.8)         $2.5     $(61.0)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes                              <B>$7.9</B>         $4.4       $(1.0)          $.4     $(24.5)
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in
   accounting principle, net of tax                              <B>$12.6</B>         $3.3       $(8.0)          $.7     $(40.8)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net
   of tax                                                                                $(51.0)
Net income (loss)                                                <B>$12.6</B>         $3.3      $(58.9)          $.7     $(40.8)
Net income (loss) per common share, basic:
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in
   accounting principle, net of tax                               <B>$.37</B>         $.10       $(.23)         $.02     $(1.19)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net
   of tax                                                                                $(1.50)
Net income (loss) per common share                                <B>$.37</B>         $.10      $(1.73)         $.02     $(1.19)
Net income (loss) per common share, diluted:
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in
   accounting principle, net of tax                               <B>$.35</B>         $.10       $(.23)         $.02     $(1.19)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net
   of tax                                                                                $(1.50)
Net income (loss) per common share                                <B>$.35</B>         $.10      $(1.73)         $.02     $(1.19)
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic                                                             <B>34.4</B>         34.2         34.1         34.1        34.3
Diluted                                                           <B>35.5</B>         34.9         34.1         34.1        34.3
<B>Selected Operating Data:</B>
- -----------------------
Orders entered                                                     <B>5.2</B>          4.4          4.0          4.0         3.9
Number of catalogs distributed                                      <B>88</B>           97          106          126         157
Number of catalog titles                                            <B>22</B>           30           37           38          37
<B>Balance Sheet Data</B>:
- ------------------
Working capital                                                 <B>$160.7</B>       $145.5       $133.3       $103.3      $106.7
Total assets                                                    <B>$484.3</B>       $446.7       $437.9       $454.4      $538.0
Short-term debt                                                  <B>$16.6</B>        $20.8        $21.2         $2.8       $48.6
Long-term debt, excluding current portion                        <B>$17.1</B>        $18.4        $17.5
Shareholders' equity                                            <B>$226.5</B>       $210.1       $201.9       $254.9      $255.7

</FONT>
</PRE>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.</B> </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Overview</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
We are a direct marketer of brand name and private label products, including
personal desktop computers, notebook computers, computer related products and
industrial products in North America and Europe. We assemble our own PCs and
sell them under our own trademarks, which we believe gives us a competitive
advantage. We also sell personal computers manufactured by other leading
companies, such as IBM and Hewlett Packard. We offer more than 100,000 products
and continuously update our product offerings to address the needs of our
customers, which include large, mid-sized and small businesses, educational and
government entities as well as individual consumers. Computers and computer
related products account for more than 90% of our net sales, and, as a result,
we are dependent on the general demand for information technology products.
</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
The market for computer products is subject to intense price competition and is
characterized by narrow gross profit margins. Distribution of information
technology products is working capital intensive, requiring us to incur
significant costs associated with the warehousing of many products, including
the costs of leasing warehouse space, maintaining inventory and inventory
management systems, and employing personnel to perform the associated tasks. We
supplement our product availability by maintaining relationships with major
distributors, utilizing a combination of stocking and drop-ship fulfillment.
</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
After poor economic and market conditions in the prior two fiscal years, we
experienced improved economic conditions and increased sales and profitability
in North America in the year just ended. In response to the economic conditions
over those past two years, we implemented a plan in the first quarter of 2004 to
streamline our United States computer business. This plan consolidated
duplicative back office and warehouse operations, which we expect will result in
annual savings of approximately $8 million excluding severance and other
restructuring costs of approximately $3 million recognized in fiscal 2004.
Economic conditions in Europe have not yet recovered and performance in those
markets continues to be negatively impacted with cautious information technology
spending. With evidence of a prolonged economic downturn, we took measures to
align our cost structure with lower revenues and decreasing gross margins. We
implemented several cost reduction plans in Europe during 2004 and, in January
2005, we announced additional actions to increase efficiency and profitability
in our United Kingdom operation. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
The primary component of our operating expenses historically has been employee
related costs, which includes items such as wages, commissions, bonuses, and
benefits.<B> </B>We have made substantial reductions in our workforce and closed
or consolidated several facilities over the past several years, reducing
selling, general and administrative expenses from 16.5% of net sales in 2002 to
13.5% of net sales in 2004. We will continue to monitor our costs and evaluate
the need for additional actions. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
The discussion of our results of operations and financial condition that follows
will provide information that will assist in understanding our financial
statements, the factors that we believe may affect our future results and
financial condition as well as information about how certain accounting
principles and estimates affect the consolidated financial statements. This
discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements included herein. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Results of Operations</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
We had net income of $12.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 and $3.3
million for the year ended December 31, 2003. For the year ended December 31,
2002, we had a net loss of $58.9 million, after recording a cumulative effect of
a change in accounting principle of $51 million, net of tax, to reflect the
impairment of the entire carrying amount of goodwill. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
The following table represents our consolidated statement of operations data
expressed as a percentage of net sales for our three most recent fiscal years:
</FONT></P>

<PRE>
                                                             <B>2004</B>       2003       2002
                                                             ----       ----       ----
     Net sales                                              <B>100.0%</B>     100.0%     100.0%
     Gross profit                                            <B>15.1%</B>      16.0%      17.1%
     Selling, general and administrative expenses            <B>13.5%</B>      15.2%      16.5%
     Restructuring and other charges                          <B>0.4%</B>       0.1%       1.1%
     Goodwill impairment                                                 0.2%
     Income (loss) from operations                            <B>1.2%</B>       0.6%     (0.5)%
     Interest expense                                         <B>0.2%</B>       0.1%       0.1%
     Provision (benefit) for income taxes                     <B>0.4%</B>       0.3%     (0.1)%
     Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change
       in accounting  principle, net of tax                   <B>0.7%</B>       0.2%     (0.5)%
     Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle,
      net of tax                                                                  (3.3)%
     Net income (loss)                                        <B>0.7%</B>       0.2%     (3.8)%

</PRE>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3><I>NET SALES</I></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Net sales were $1.93 billion for the year ended December 31, 2004, an increase
of 16.3% from $1.66 billion for the year ended December 31, 2003. Net sales in
2004 included approximately $515 million of internet-related sales, an increase
of $131 million, or 34%, from 2003. North American sales increased to $1.23
billion, a 20.0% increase from last year&#146;s $1.03 billion. The increase in
North American sales resulted primarily from continued growth in our consumer
business, as reflected by the substantial increase in our internet-related
sales. With the United States economy improving after several years of softness,
we also had strong growth in our industrial product sales in 2004. European
sales, stated in US dollars, increased 10.2% to $696.2 million for 2004
(representing 36.1% of worldwide sales) compared to $631.5 million (representing
38.1% of worldwide sales) in the year-ago period. Movements in foreign exchange
rates positively impacted European sales for 2004 by approximately $70.0
million. If currency exchange rates for 2003 had prevailed in 2004, European
sales would have decreased 0.8% from the prior year. Continued weakness in
demand for information technology products from corporate customers in Europe
and the effect of exchange rate movements on product pricing in certain European
markets resulted in decreased local currency denominated sales. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2003 were $1.66 billion, an increase
of 6.8% from $1.55 billion for the year ended December 31, 2002. North American
sales were $1.03 billion, a 6.5% increase from last year&#146;s $963.8 million.
The increase in North American sales was a result of growth in our consumer
business. Continued weakness in demand for information technology products from
corporate customers resulted in lower sales to those customers. European sales,
in US dollars, increased 7.5% to $631.5 million for 2003 (representing 38.1% of
worldwide sales) compared to $587.7 million (representing 37.9% of worldwide
sales) in the year-ago period. Movements in foreign exchange rates positively
impacted European sales for 2003 by approximately $81.0 million. If currency
exchange rates for 2002 had prevailed in 2003, European sales would have
decreased 6.3% from the prior year. Lower demand and the effect of exchange rate
movements on product pricing in certain European markets resulted in decreased
local currency denominated sales. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
European economies continued to weaken during 2004, which is reflected in our
results. The table below reflects European sales for the three reported years as
reported herein at constant (2002) exchange rates (in millions): </FONT></P>

<PRE>
                                                  2004         2003          2002
                                                  ----         ----          ----
     European sales as reported                  $696.2       $631.5       $587.7
     European sales at 2002 exchange rates       $545.5       $550.6       $587.7
</PRE>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3><I>GROSS PROFIT</I></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Gross profit, which consists of net sales less product cost, shipping, assembly
and certain distribution center costs, was $290.4 million, or 15.1% of net
sales, for the year ended December 31, 2004, compared to $265.0 million or 16.0%
of net sales in 2003. Our gross profit ratio declined in 2004 as a result of
increased pricing pressures on our computer business both in North America and
Europe. The decline was partially offset by improved margins on industrial
products. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Gross profit was $265.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, or 16.0%
of net sales, compared to $265.6 million, or 17.1% of net sales, in
2002.&#160;&#160;As a result of adopting Emerging Issues Task Force
(&#147;EITF&#148;) Issue No. 02-16, &#147;Accounting by a Customer (including a
Reseller) for Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor&#148;, $14.5 million
of vendor consideration was recorded as a reduction of cost of sales in 2003.
Excluding the impact of EITF 02-16, and therefore on a non-GAAP basis, the gross
profit margin would have been 15.1% in 2003 compared to 17.1% in 2002. (The
non-GAAP gross profit margin has been included here to provide comparability to
the prior year.) The decline in the gross profit margin was due to continued
pricing pressure resulting from weak market demand and response to competition
and changes in the mix of products sold, as customers continue to shift to
lower-priced solutions. </FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3><I>SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES</I></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Selling, general and administrative expenses totaled $260.1 million, or 13.5% of
net sales, in 2004, an increase of $8.7 million, or 3.4%, compared to $251.5
million, or 15.2% of net sales, in 2003. This increase resulted from
approximately $10 million of increased costs in Europe resulting from the
effects of changes in foreign exchange rates and $4 million of higher credit
card processing fees from the higher sales volume in 2004. The increase was
partially offset through restructuring actions taken, reducing our employee
count in the United States and lowering salary expense and related benefit costs
by $6 million in 2004. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Selling, general and administrative expenses for 2003 were $251.5 million
compared to $256.1 million in 2002, a net decrease of $4.6 million or 1.8%. The
decrease was realized in our North American operations and included decreased
television advertising spending related to sales of the Company&#146;s PCs. In
addition, as a result of increased internet sales, we were able to leverage our
total advertising spending and reduce our other advertising expenses by reducing
the number of catalogs we mailed. These decreases were partially offset by
approximately $13 million of increased costs in Europe resulting from the
effects of changes in foreign exchange rates and the effects of the adoption of
EITF 02-16. The adoption of EITF 02-16 resulted in the reclassification of
$14.5&#160;million of vendor consideration as a reduction of cost of sales,
which would previously have been recorded as a reduction of advertising expense.
As a percentage of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses were
15.2% (14.3% on a non-GAAP basis before the adoption of EITF 02-16) compared to
16.5% in the year-ago period. </FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3><I>RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER CHARGES</I></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
We incurred $7.4 million of restructuring and other charges in 2004. In the
first quarter of 2004 we implemented a plan to streamline the activities of our
United States computer businesses&#146; back office and warehouse operations,
resulting in the elimination of approximately 200 jobs. We incurred $3.7 million
of restructuring costs associated with this plan, including $3.2 million for
staff severance and benefits for terminated employees and $0.5 million of
non-cash costs for impairment of the carrying value of fixed assets. We recorded
$0.6 million of additional costs in 2004 related to facility exit costs for our
2003 plan to consolidate United States warehouse locations. We also implemented
several cost reduction plans in Europe during 2004, including a consolidation of
United Kingdom sales offices which resulted in the elimination of 50 jobs. We
incurred $2.5 million of restructuring charges for facility exit costs and
workforce reductions in connection with these actions and $0.5 million of
additional costs resulting from adjustments to our estimates of lease and
contract termination costs for our 2002 plan to consolidate our United Kingdom
operations. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
In 2003, we had $1.7 million of restructuring and other charges. In the fourth
quarter of 2003 we implemented a plan to consolidate the warehousing facilities
in our United States computer business. We recorded $713,000 of costs related to
this plan in the fourth quarter, including $233,000 of non-cash costs for
impairment of the carrying value of fixed assets and $480,000 of charges for
other exit costs. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 we recorded $2.2
million of additional costs, net of reductions, as a charge to operations for
our 2002 United Kingdom consolidation plan. These charges consisted of $1.6
million of other restructuring activities as we adjusted the original estimates
of lease and contract termination costs and $600,000 of additional non-cash
asset impairments, related to buildings vacated. The restructuring costs
incurred in 2003 were partially offset by a $1.3 million reversal of a
previously recorded liability which was no longer required as a result of our
settlement of litigation with a software developer in August 2003. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
During the second quarter of 2003, we purchased the minority ownership of our
Netherlands subsidiary for approximately $2.6 million, pursuant to the terms of
the original purchase agreement. All of the purchase price was attributable to
goodwill and, as a result of an impairment analysis, was written off in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 142, &#147;Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets.&quot; </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
We recorded $17.3 million of restructuring and other charges during 2002. We
implemented a plan to consolidate the activities of our three United Kingdom
locations into a new facility we had constructed. We incurred $4.1 million of
costs associated with the plan, including $1.9 million for recruitment, staff
relocation and severance and benefits for approximately 150 terminated
employees, $1.7 million of charges for other exit costs, primarily facilities
closing and lease terminations, and $0.5 million of non-cash costs for
impairment of the carrying value of fixed assets. During the second quarter of
2002 we recorded a non-recurring write-off of $13.2 million resulting from our
decision to discontinue development of internal-use computer software.
</FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3><I>INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS</I></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
We had income from operations of $22.9 million in 2004 and $9.3 million in 2003.
We had a loss from operations of $7.8 million in 2002. For the year ended
December 31, 2004, restructuring charges of $7.4 million were included in income
from operations. Results in 2003 include restructuring and other charges of $1.7
million and a goodwill impairment charge of $2.6 million. The loss from
operations in 2002 includes $17.3 million of restructuring and other charges.
</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
We had losses from operations in Europe for the year ended December 31, 2004 of
$12.5 million and in 2003 of $5.2 million, compared to income from operations of
$7.8 million in Europe in 2002. European results continued to decline as a
result of decreased gross profit and increased selling, general and
administrative expenses. As a result of the decline in our European
profitability, in early 2005 we announced additional plans to reduce costs and
increase efficiency through the elimination of approximately 185 positions in
Europe, which is expected to result in approximately $8 million in annual
savings. </FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3><I>INTEREST AND OTHER INCOME AND INTEREST EXPENSE</I></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Interest expense was $3.1 million in 2004, $2.3 million in 2003 and $1.7 million
in 2002. Interest expense increased in 2004 as a result of increased short-term
borrowings in the United Kingdom. The increased expense in 2003 resulted from
increased short-term borrowings under our United Kingdom facility and a full
year of interest expense on long-term obligations incurred in 2002. Interest and
other income, net was $0.6 million in 2004, $0.8 million in 2003 and $0.4
million in 2002. </FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3><I>INCOME TAXES</I></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Our income tax provision was $7.9 million in 2004 and $4.4 million in 2003 and
we had an income tax benefit of $1.0 million in 2002. The effective rates were
38.7% in 2004, 56.5% in 2003 and 11.5% in 2002. The tax rate in 2004 was higher
than the United States statutory rate of 35% primarily due to losses in foreign
jurisdictions for which we recognized no tax benefit and losses in a foreign
jurisdiction where the benefit rate is lower than the rate in the United States.
The effective tax rate in 2003 was adversely affected by the goodwill impairment
write-off, which is not tax deducible. The mix in taxable income and losses
between our U. S. and foreign operations and the expected utilization of our
deferred tax assets significantly impacted the recording of the 2002 tax
benefit. In 2002, we also incurred additional tax expense in connection with
audit assessments in two of our foreign subsidiaries. For the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, we have not recognized certain foreign tax
credits, certain state tax benefits on losses in the United States and certain
benefits on losses in foreign tax jurisdictions due to our inability to carry
such credits and losses back to prior years. Accordingly, valuation allowances
were recorded against the deferred tax assets associated with those tax credits
and net operating loss carryforwards. </FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3><I>CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE</I></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
During the first half of 2002, we completed the transitional review for goodwill
impairment required by SFAS 142. The review indicated that the entire carrying
value of the goodwill recorded on our consolidated balance sheet was impaired as
of January 1, 2002. Accordingly, we recorded a transitional impairment loss of
$68 million ($51 million net of tax or a net loss per share of $1.50) as a
cumulative effect of change in accounting principle in our statements of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2002. </FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3><I>NET INCOME (LOSS)</I></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
As a result of the above, net income for 2004 was $12.6 million, or $.37 per
basic share and $.35 per diluted share, and for 2003 was $3.3 million, or $.10
per basic and diluted share. The net loss for 2002 was $58.9 million, or $1.73
per basic and diluted share. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Seasonality</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Net sales have historically been modestly weaker during the second and third
quarter as a result of lower business activity during those months. The
following table sets forth the net sales, gross profit and income (loss) from
operations for each of the quarters since January 1, 2003 <I>(amounts in
millions)</I>. </FONT></P>

<PRE><FONT SIZE=1>
<B>     2003                                                 March 31      June 30      September 30      December 31
     ----                                                 --------      -------      ------------      -----------
     Net sales                                              $486         $431           $460              $551
     Percentage of year's net sales                         25.2%        22.4%          23.9%             28.5%
     Gross profit, as restated (1)                           $74          $67            $72               $77
     Income from  operations,  as restated(1)                 $5           $2             $5               $11</B>

     2003
     ----
     Net sales                                              $426         $389           $405              $438
     Percentage of year's net sales                         25.7%        23.5%          24.4%            26.4%
     Gross profit                                            $72          $63            $66               $64
     Income (loss) from operations                            $8          $(1)            $3                $-

     (1) See Note 12 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements
</FONT>
</PRE>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3><B>Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources</B></FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Liquidity is the ability to generate sufficient cash flows to meet obligations
and commitments from operating activities and the ability to obtain appropriate
financing and to convert into cash those assets that are no longer required to
meet existing strategic and financing objectives. Therefore, liquidity cannot be
considered separately from capital resources that consist of current and
potentially available funds for use in achieving long-range business objectives
and meeting debt service commitments. Currently, our liquidity needs arise
primarily from working capital requirements and capital expenditures.</FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Our working capital was $161 million at December 31, 2004, an increase of $15
million from $146 million at the end of 2003. This was due principally to a $42
million increase in inventories, a $1 million increase in accounts receivable
and a $4 million decrease in short-term borrowings offset by a $17 million
increase in accounts payable, an $8 million increase in taxes payable, a $2
million increase in accrued expense and other current liabilities, a $2 million
decrease in cash and a $3 million decrease in prepaid expenses and other current
assets. We increased our inventories in the United States to meet the needs of
our growing consumer base, as increased stock levels facilitate such sales. The
inventory increase in the U.S. was partially offset by a reduction in our
European inventories in response to the weakness in these markets. The increase
in our accounts receivable as a percentage was less than the increase in our
sales. Our North American accounts receivable decreased, as our sales growth
there came primarily from consumer accounts, which are generally paid by credit
card in a 2-3 day shipment-to-cash cycle. The increase in accounts receivable
was attributable to Europe, as the accounts receivable stated in U.S. dollars
increased as a result of changes in exchange rates. We expect that future
accounts receivable and inventory balances will fluctuate with the mix of our
net sales between consumer and business customers, as well as geographic
regions.</FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
We maintain our cash and cash equivalents primarily in money market funds or
their equivalent. As of December 31, 2004, all of our investments mature in less
than three months. Accordingly, we do not believe that our investments have
significant exposure to interest rate risk.</FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Our cash balance decreased $2.4 million to $36.3 million during the year ended
December 31, 2004. Net cash provided by operating activities was $12.6 million
for the year ended December 31, 2004, compared with net cash used in operating
activities of $6.6 million in 2003 and net cash provided by operating activities
of $4.9 million in 2002. The $19.2 million increase in cash provided by
operating activities in 2004 resulted from an increase in cash provided by net
income adjusted by other non-cash items, such as depreciation expense, and a
decrease in cash used for changes in our working capital accounts. Cash provided
by net income and other non-cash items was $30.4 million in 2004, compared to
$21.9 million in 2003, and was primarily attributable to our increase in net
income. The cash used for changes in our working capital accounts, which was
discussed previously, was $17.8 million in 2004 compared to $28.5 million in
2003. The decrease of $11.5 million in cash provided by operations for the year
ended December 31, 2003 compared to 2002 resulted from changes in our working
capital accounts, which used $28.5 million in cash compared to using $16.8
million in 2002, and resulted primarily from the increase in our inventories and
a decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses. Cash provided from our net
income and other non-cash items was $21.9 million in 2003, which was
substantially unchanged compared to $21.6 million provided by these items in
2002.</FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
In 2004, $8.3 million of cash was used in investing activities, principally for
the purchase of property, plant and equipment. Capital expenditures in 2004
included upgrades and enhancements to our information and communications systems
hardware and facilities costs for the opening of two additional retail outlet
stores in the United States. During 2003, $11.2 million of cash was used in
investing activities, principally $8.7 million for the purchase of property,
plant and equipment, and $2.6 million for the acquisition of the minority
interest in our Netherlands subsidiary. The capital expenditures in 2003
included upgrades and enhancements to our information and communications systems
hardware and facilities costs for the opening of several retail outlet stores.
Cash of $14.7 million was used in investing activities in 2002. This included
$15.4 million of additions to property, plant and equipment, primarily for the
completion of a new facility for our United Kingdom operations. We anticipate no
major capital expenditures in 2005 and will fund any capital expenditures out of
cash from operations and borrowings under our credit lines.</FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Net cash of $6.7 million was used in financing activities in 2004, primarily for
the repayment of short and long-term borrowings. Net cash of $2.3 million was
used in financing activities in 2003. Cash of $4.2 million was used to repay
short and long-term obligations, which was partially offset by $1.5 million of
cash provided by the issuance of capital leases and $419,000 provided by the
exercise of stock options. Cash of $33.8 million was provided by financing
activities in 2002 from bank borrowings and the mortgaging of our Georgia
distribution facility and new United Kingdom facility.</FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Under our $70 million United States secured revolving credit agreement, which
expires on September 30, 2006, availability as of December 31, 2004 was $54.6
million. The revolving credit agreement contains certain financial and other
covenants, including restrictions on capital expenditures and payments of
dividends. We were in compliance with all of the covenants as of December 31,
2004. There were outstanding letters of credit of $9.1 million and there were no
outstanding advances as of December 31, 2004.</FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
We also maintain a(pound)15 million ($28.5 million at the December 31, 2004
exchange rate, which exchange rate applies to all the other Sterling denominated
amounts below) multi-currency credit facility with a financial institution in
the United Kingdom, which is available to our United Kingdom subsidiaries. The
facility does not have a termination date, but may be canceled by either party
on six months notice. Borrowings under the facility are secured by certain
assets of our United Kingdom subsidiaries. At December 31, 2004 there
were(pound)5.3 million ($10.0 million) of borrowings outstanding under this line
with interest payable at a rate of 5.87%.</FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Our Netherlands subsidiary has a(euro)5 million ($6.7 million at the December
31, 2004 exchange rate, which exchange rate applies to all the other Euro
denominated amounts below) credit facility. Borrowings under the facility are
secured by the subsidiary's accounts receivable and are subject to a borrowing
base limitation of 85% of the eligible accounts. At December 31, 2004 there
were(euro)3.5 million ($4.8 million) of borrowings outstanding under this line
with interest payable at a rate of 5.0%. The facility expires in November 2005.</FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
In 2002 we entered into a(pound)6.6 million ($12.5 million), 11 1/2year term
loan agreement with a United Kingdom bank, to finance the construction of a new
United Kingdom facility. The borrowings are secured by the land and building and
are repayable in 40 quarterly installments of(pound)165,000 ($313,000) through
August 2012. The outstanding borrowings bear interest at LIBOR plus 160 basis
points (5.25% at December 31, 2004). In connection with this term loan, we also
entered into an interest rate collar agreement to reduce our exposure to market
rate fluctuations. At December 31, 2004, the notional amount of the interest
rate collar was(pound)5,115,000 ($9,713,000) with an interest rate cap of 6.0%
and a floor of 4.5%. The interest rate collar expires on April 30, 2005. As of
December 31, 2004, the collar was in a neutral position. The change in the fair
value of this derivative for the year ended December 31, 2004 has been
recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Operations as this hedge was
determined to be ineffective. The term loan agreement contains certain financial
and other covenants related to our United Kingdom subsidiaries. As of December
31, 2004, the Company was not in compliance with the financial covenants.
The Company has received the lender's agreement to issue a waiver with
respect to these covenants.</FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
In April 2002 we entered into a ten year, $8.4 million mortgage loan on our
Suwanee, Georgia distribution facility. The mortgage has monthly principal and
interest payments of $62,000 through May 2012, with a final additional principal
payment of $6.4 million at maturity in May 2012. The mortgage loan bears
interest at 7.04% and is collateralized by the underlying land and building.</FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
We are obligated under non-cancelable operating leases for the rental of most of
our facilities and certain of our equipment which expire at various dates
through 2014. We currently lease our New York facility from an entity owned by
Richard Leeds, Robert Leeds and Bruce Leeds, the Company's three principal
shareholders and senior executive officers. The annual rental totals $612,000
and the lease expires in 2007. We have sublease agreements for leased space in
Compton, California and Markham, Ontario. In the event the sublessees are unable
to fulfill their obligations, we would be responsible for rent due under the
leases. However, we expect the sublessees will fulfill their obligations under
these leases.</FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Following is a summary of our contractual obligations for future principal
payments on our debt, minimum rental payments on our non-cancelable operating
leases and minimum payments on our other commitments at December 31, 2004 (in
thousands):</FONT></P>

<PRE><FONT SIZE=1>
                                                                                     After
                                         2005     2006     2007     2008     2009     2009
                                         ----     ----     ----     ----     ----     ----
<I>Contractual Obligations:</I>
Maturities of long-term debt           $1,811   $1,817   $1,747   $1,587   $1,482  $10,466
Payments on non-cancelable
   operating leases, net of
   subleases                            8,097    7,633    7,092    5,691    5,326    6,924
Purchase commitments                    1,040      727      316       75        -        -
                                      --------  -------   ------   ------   -----    ------
Total contractual obligations         $10,948  $10,177   $9,155   $7,353   $6,808  $17,390
                                      =======   ======   ======   ======   ======  =======

<I>Other Commitments:</I>
  Letters of credit                    $9,102      N/A      N/A      N/A      N/A      N/A
                                       ======
</FONT>
</PRE>


<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Our operating results have generated cash flow which, together with borrowings
under our debt agreements, have provided sufficient capital resources to finance
working capital and cash operating requirements, fund capital expenditures, and
fund the payment of interest on outstanding debt. Our primary ongoing cash
requirements will be to finance working capital, fund the payment of principal
and interest on indebtedness and fund capital expenditures. We believe future
cash flows from operations and availability of borrowings under our lines of
credit will be sufficient to fund ongoing cash requirements. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
We are party to certain litigation, the outcome of which we believe, based on
discussions with legal counsel, will not have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated financial statements. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Off-balance Sheet Arrangements</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
We have not created, and are not party to, any special-purpose or off-balance
sheet entities for the purpose of raising capital, incurring debt or operating
our business. We do not have any arrangements or relationships with entities
that are not consolidated into the financial statements that are reasonably
likely to materially affect our liquidity or the availability of capital
resources. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Factors That May Affect Future Results and Financial
Condition</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
There are a number of factors and variables that affect our results of
operations and financial condition. Following is a description of some of the
important factors that may affect future results. </FONT></P>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&#149;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=90%>
<I>Economic conditions have affected and could continue to adversely affect our
revenues and profits.</I><BR>
<BR>
Both we and our business customers are subject to global political, economic and
market conditions, including military action and the threat of terrorism.
Economic conditions in the United States have improved after several years of
adverse conditions. Economic conditions in Europe continue to be unsettled. If
the strengthening of general economic conditions does not continue and if
conditions in Europe remain weak, our results could continue to be adversely
affected. We may experience a decline in sales as a result of poor economic
conditions and the lack of visibility relating to future orders. Our
consolidated results of operations depend upon, among other things, our ability
to maintain and increase sales volumes with existing customers, our ability to
attract new customers and the financial condition of our customers. A decline in
the economy that adversely affects our customers, causing them to limit or defer
their spending, would likely adversely affect us as well. We cannot predict with
any certainty whether we will be able to maintain or improve upon historical
sales volumes with existing customers, or whether we will be able to attract new
customers.<BR>
<BR>
In response to economic and market conditions, from time to time we have
undertaken initiatives to reduce our cost structure where appropriate. The
initiatives already implemented as well as any future workforce and facilities
reductions undertaken may not be sufficient to meet the changes in economic and
market conditions and to achieve future profitability. In addition, costs
actually incurred in connection with our restructuring actions may be higher
than our estimates of such costs and/or may not lead to the anticipated cost
savings.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&#149;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=90%>
<I>Competitive pressures could harm our revenue and gross margin.</I><BR>
<BR>
We may not be able to compete effectively with current or future competitors.
The market for our products and services is intensely competitive and subject to
constant technological change. We expect this competition to further intensify
in the future. Competitive factors include price, availability, service and
support. We compete with a wide variety of other resellers and retailers, as
well as manufacturers. Some of our competitors are larger companies with greater
financial, marketing and product development resources than ours. In addition,
new competitors may enter our markets. This may place us at a disadvantage in
responding to competitors' pricing strategies, technological advances and other
initiatives, resulting in our inability to increase our revenues or maintain our
gross margins in the future.<BR>
<BR>
In many cases our products compete directly with those offered by other
manufacturers and distributors. If any of our competitors were to develop
products or services that are more cost-effective or technically superior,
demand for our product offerings could decrease.<BR>
<BR>
Our margins are also dependent on the mix of products we sell and could be
adversely affected by a continuation of our customers&#146; shift to
lower-priced products.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&#149;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=90%>
<I>We are dependent on third-party suppliers.</I><BR>
<BR>
We purchase a significant portion of our computer products from major
distributors such as Tech Data Corporation and Ingram Micro&#160;Inc. and
directly from large manufacturers such as IBM and Hewlett Packard, who deliver
those products directly to our customers. These relationships enable us to make
available to our customers a wide selection of products without having to
maintaining large amounts of inventory. The termination or interruption of our
relationships with any of these suppliers could materially adversely affect our
business.<BR>
<BR>
Our PC products contain electronic components, subassemblies and software that
in some cases are supplied through sole or limited source third-party suppliers,
some of which are located outside of the U.S. Although we do not anticipate any
problems procuring supplies in the near-term, there can never be any assurance
that parts and supplies will be available in a timely manner and at reasonable
prices. Any loss of, or interruption of supply from key suppliers may require us
to find new suppliers. This could result in production or development delays
while new suppliers are located, which could substantially impair operating
results. If the availability of these or other components used in the
manufacture of our products was to decrease, or if the prices for these
components were to increase significantly, operating costs and expenses could be
adversely affected.<BR>
<BR>
A portion of our revenue is derived from the sale of products manufactured using
licensed patents, software and/or technology. Failure to renew these licenses on
favorable terms or at all could force us to stop manufacturing and distributing
these products and our financial condition could be adversely affected.<BR>
<BR>
Many product suppliers provide us with co-op advertising support in exchange for
featuring their products in our catalogs and on our internet sites. Certain
suppliers provide us with other incentives such as rebates, reimbursements,
payment discounts, price protection and other similar arrangements. These
incentives are offset against cost of goods sold or selling, general and
administrative expenses, as applicable. The level of co-op advertising support
and other incentives received from suppliers may decline in the future, which
could increase our cost of goods sold or selling, general and administrative
expenses and have an adverse effect on results of operations and cash
flows.</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&#149;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=90%>
<I>We are exposed to inventory risks.</I><BR>
<BR>
A substantial portion of our inventory is subject to risk due to technological
change and changes in market demand for particular products. Certain of our
suppliers offer limited price protection from the loss in value of inventory and
we have limited rights to return purchases to certain suppliers. The decrease or
elimination of price protection or purchase returns could lower our gross margin
or result in inventory write-downs. We also take advantage of attractive product
pricing by making opportunistic bulk inventory purchases; any resulting excess
and/or obsolete inventory that we are not able to re-sell could have an adverse
impact on our results of operations. Any inability to make such bulk inventory
purchases may significantly impact our sales and profitability.</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&#149;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=90%>
<I>State and local sales tax collection may affect demand for our products.</I><BR>
<BR>
Our United States subsidiaries collect and remit sales tax in states in which
the subsidiaries have physical presence or in which we believe nexus exists
which obligates us to collect sales tax. Other states may, from time to time,
claim that we have state-related activities constituting a sufficient nexus to
require such collection. Additionally, many other states seek to impose sales
tax collection obligations on companies that sell goods to customers in their
state, or directly to the state and its political subdivisions, even without a
physical presence. Such efforts by states have increased recently, as states
seek to raise revenues without increasing the tax burden on residents. We rely,
as do other direct mail retailers, on United States Supreme Court decisions
which hold that, without Congressional authority, a state may not enforce a
sales tax collection obligation on a company that has no physical presence in
the state and whose only contacts with the state are through the use of
interstate commerce such as the mailing of catalogs into the state and the
delivery of goods by mail or common carrier. We cannot predict whether the
nature or level of contacts we have with a particular state will be deemed
enough to require us to collect sales tax in that state nor can we be assured
that Congress or individual states will not approve legislation authorizing
states to impose tax collection obligations on all direct mail and/or e-commerce
transactions. A successful assertion by one or more states that we should
collect sales tax on the sale of merchandise could result in substantial tax
liabilities related to past sales and would result in considerable
administrative burdens and costs for us and may reduce demand for our products
from customers in such states when we charge customers for such
taxes.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>


<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&#149;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=90%>
<I>We have substantial international operations and we are exposed to
fluctuations in currency exchange rates and political uncertainties.</I><BR>
<BR>
We currently have operations located in nine countries outside the United
States, and non-U.S. sales (Europe and Canada) accounted for 40% of our revenue
during 2004. Our future results could be materially adversely affected by a
variety of factors, including changes in foreign currency exchange rates,
changes in a country&#146;s economic or political conditions and unexpected
changes in regulatory requirements.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&#149;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=90%>
<I>Our income tax rate and the value of our deferred tax assets are subject to
change.</I><BR>
<BR>
Changes in our income tax expense due to changes in the mix of U.S. and non-U.S.
revenues and profitability, changes in tax rates or exposure to additional
income tax liabilities could affect our profitability. We are subject to income
taxes in the United States and various foreign jurisdictions. Our effective tax
rate could be adversely affected by changes in the mix of earnings in countries
with differing statutory tax rates, changes in the valuation of deferred tax
assets and liabilities, changes in tax laws or by material audit assessments.
The carrying value of our deferred tax assets, which are primarily in the United
States and the United Kingdom, is dependent on our ability to generate future
taxable income in those jurisdictions. In addition, the amount of income taxes
we pay is subject to ongoing audits in various jurisdictions and a material
assessment by a tax authority could affect our profitability.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&#149;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=90%>
<I>Business disruptions could adversely impact our revenue and financial
condition.</I><BR>
<BR>
It is our policy to insure for certain property and casualty risks consisting
primarily of physical loss to property, business interruptions resulting from
property losses, workers' compensation, comprehensive general liability, and
auto liability. Insurance coverage is obtained for catastrophic property and
casualty exposures as well as those risks required to be insured by law or
contract. Although we believe that our insurance coverage is reasonable,
significant events such as acts of war and terrorism, economic conditions,
judicial decisions, legislation, natural disasters and large losses could
materially affect our insurance obligations and future expense.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&#149;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=90%>
<I>Reliance on technology</I><BR>
<BR>
We rely on a variety of information and telecommunications systems in our
operations. Our success is dependent in large part on the accuracy and proper
use of our information systems, including our telecommunications systems. To
manage our growth, we continually evaluate the adequacy of our existing systems
and procedures. We anticipate that we will regularly need to make capital
expenditures to upgrade and modify our management information systems, including
software and hardware, as we grow and the needs of our business change. The
occurrence of a significant system failure or our failure to expand or
successfully implement our systems could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations.<BR>
<BR>
Our information systems networks, including our web sites, and applications
could be adversely affected by viruses or worms and may be vulnerable to
malicious acts such as hacking. Although we take preventive measures, these
procedures may not be sufficient to avoid harm to our operations, which could
have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&#149;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=90%>
<I>Availability of credit and financing.</I><BR>
<BR>
We require significant levels of capital in our business to finance accounts
receivable and inventory. We maintain credit facilities in the United States and
in Europe to finance increases in our working capital if available cash is
insufficient. The amount of credit available to us at any point in time may be
adversely affected by the quality or value of the assets collateralizing these
credit lines. Such agreements require that we satisfy certain financial and
other covenants. In addition, if we are unable to renew or replace these
facilities at maturity, or if we are in breach of covenants, our liquidity and
capital resources may be adversely affected. However, we have no reason to
believe that we will not be able to renew or replace our facilities when they
reach maturity.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&#149;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=90%>
<I>Sales to individual consumers exposes us to credit card fraud, which could
adversely affect our business.</I><BR>
<BR>
Failure to adequately control fraudulent credit card transactions could increase
our expenses. Increased sales to individual consumers, which are more likely to
be paid for using a credit card, increases our exposure to fraud. We employ
technology solutions to help us detect the fraudulent use of credit card
information. However, if we are unable to detect or control credit card fraud,
we may in the future suffer losses as a result of orders placed with fraudulent
credit card data, which could adversely affect our business.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&#149;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=90%>
<I>We may encounter risks in connection with sales of our new web-hosted software
application</I><BR>
<BR>
In 2004 we successfully introduced our web-based and hosted, on-demand software
suite of products, marketed as ProfitCenter Software. We have a limited
operating history with this type of product offering and may encounter risks
inherent in the software industry, including but not limited to:
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&#149;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=80%>Errors or security flaws in our product</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&#149;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=80%>Technical difficulties which we can not resolve on a timely or
cost-effective basis,</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&#149;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=80%>Inability to provide the level of service we commit to</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&#149;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=80%>Inability to deliver product upgrades and enhancements</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&#149;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=80%>Delays in development</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&#149;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=80%>Inability to hire and retain qualified technical personnel</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&#149;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=80%>Impact of privacy laws on the use of our product</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&#149;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=80%>Exposure to claims of infringement of intellectual property
rights</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&#149;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=90%>
<I>Increased costs associated with corporate governance compliance may impact
our results of operations.</I><BR>
<BR>
As a public company, we incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses
that we would not incur as a private company. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, as well as rules subsequently implemented by the Securities and
Exchange Commission and listing requirements subsequently adopted by the New
York Stock Exchange in response to Sarbanes-Oxley, have required changes in
corporate governance practices of public companies. We expect these
developments, especially the impact of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, to
increase our legal compliance and financial reporting costs and make some
activities more costly and time consuming. These developments may make it more
difficult and more expensive for us to obtain directors&#146; and officers&#146;
liability insurance and we may be required to accept reduced coverage or incur
substantially higher costs to obtain coverage, possibly making it more difficult
for us to attract and retain qualified members of our board of directors,
particularly to serve on our audit committee. We presently cannot estimate the
timing or magnitude of additional costs we may incur as a result; however, to
the extent these costs are significant, our general and administrative expenses
are likely to increase as a percentage of revenue and our results of operations
will be negatively impacted.</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&#149;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=90%>
<I>In the event we are unable to satisfy regulatory requirements requiring
companies to evaluate internal contros under Section&#160;404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or if these internal controls are not effective, our
business could suffer.</I><BR>
<BR>
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 will require that we evaluate and
report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and
have our independent registered public accounting firm attest to such
evaluation. Based on current SEC implementing regulations and assuming that we
will be considered an accelerated filer in 2005 (which will be determined based
on our public float at the end of our second fiscal quarter of 2005), we will be
required to satisfy the Section 404 requirements beginning with our annual
report for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005. We have prepared a plan of
action for compliance and we are in the process of documenting and testing our
systems of internal control over financial reporting. Due to the ongoing
evaluation and testing of our internal control over financial reporting we
cannot be assured that significant deficiencies or material weaknesses would not be
required to be reported in the future. We have already identified a number of
deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting. We are working to
implement remedial measures which include enhancements to eliminate these
deficiencies. If we are not able to implement the requirements of
Section&#160;404 in a timely manner or with adequate compliance, we might be
subject to regulatory sanctions and we might suffer a loss of public confidence
in our reported financial information. Any such action could adversely affect
our business and financial results.</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Other factors that could contribute to or cause such differences include, but
are not limited to, unanticipated developments in any one or more of the
following areas: (i) the effect on us of volatility in the price of paper and
periodic increases in postage rates, (ii) the operation of our management
information systems, (iii) significant changes in the computer products retail
industry, especially relating to the distribution and sale of such products,
(iv) timely availability of existing and new products, (v) risks involved with
e-commerce, including possible loss of business and customer dissatisfaction if
outages or other computer-related problems should preclude customer access to
us, (vi) risks associated with delivery of merchandise to customers by utilizing
common delivery services such as the United States Postal Service and United
Parcel Service, including possible strikes and contamination, (vii) borrowing
costs or availability, (viii) pending or threatened litigation and
investigations and (ix) the availability of key personnel, as well as other risk
factors which may be detailed from time to time in our Securities and Exchange
Commission filings. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward looking
statements contained in this report, which speak only as of the date of this
report. We undertake no obligation to publicly release the result of any
revisions to these forward looking statements that may be made to reflect events
or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of
unexpected events. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the consolidated
financial statements. The policies below have been identified as critical to our
business operations and understanding the results of operations. Certain
accounting policies require the application of significant judgment by
management in selecting the appropriate assumptions for calculating financial
estimates. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of
uncertainty, and as a result, actual results could differ from those estimates.
These judgments are based on historical experience<I>, </I>observation of trends
in the industry, information provided by customers and information available
from other outside sources, as appropriate. Management believes that full
consideration has been given to all relevant circumstances that we may be
subject to, and the consolidated financial statements of the Company accurately
reflect management's best estimate of the consolidated results of operations,
financial position and cash flows of the Company for the years presented. Actual
results may differ from these estimates under different conditions or
assumptions. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><I>Revenue Recognition.</I> We recognize product sales when
persuasive evidence of an order arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the
sales price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured.
Generally, these criteria are met at the time of product shipment under FOB
shipping terms. Sales are shown net of returns and allowances, rebates and sales
incentives. Reserves for estimated returns and allowances are provided when
sales are recorded, based on historical experience and current trends. We
recognize revenue for our software sales in accordance with Emerging Issues Task
Force (EITF) Issue No. 00-21, &#147;Revenue Arrangements with Multiple
Deliverables.&#148; Hosting and service revenues will be recognized on a monthly
basis over the terms of the contracts. Professional services and other revenues,
when sold with hosting services, are recognized as the services are rendered.
</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><I>Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts</I>.
We record an allowance for doubtful accounts to reflect our estimate of the
collectibility of our trade accounts receivable. We evaluate the collectibility
of accounts receivable based on a combination of factors, including an analysis
of the age of customer accounts and our historical experience with accounts
receivable write-offs. The analysis also includes the financial condition of a
specific customer or industry, and general economic conditions. In circumstances
where we are aware of customer charge-backs or a specific customer's inability
to meet its financial obligations, a specific reserve for bad debts applicable
to amounts due to reduce the net recognized receivable to the amount management
reasonably believes will be collected is recorded. In those situations with
ongoing discussions, the amount of bad debt recognized is based on the status of
the discussions. While bad debt allowances have been within expectations and the
provisions established, there can be no guarantee that we will continue to
experience the same allowance rate we have in the past. </FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3><I>Inventories</I>. We value our inventories at the
lower of cost or market, cost being determined on the first-in, first-out
method. Reserves for excess and obsolete or unmarketable merchandise are
provided based on historical experience, assumptions about future product demand
and market conditions. The adequacy of these reserves are evaluated quarterly.
If market conditions are less favorable than projected or if technological
developments result in accelerated obsolescence, additional write-downs may be
required. While obsolescence and resultant markdowns have been within
expectations, there can be no guarantee that we will continue to experience the
same level of markdowns we have in the past.</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><I>Long-lived Assets.</I> Management exercises judgment in
evaluating our long-lived assets for impairment. We believe we will generate
sufficient undiscounted cash flow to more than recover the investments made in
property, plant and equipment. While we believe that our estimates of future
cash flows are reasonable, different assumptions regarding such cash flows could
materially affect our evaluations </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><I>Income Taxes.</I> We are subject to taxation from federal,
state and foreign jurisdictions and the determination of our tax provision is
complex and requires significant management judgment. Management judgment is
also applied in the determination of deferred tax assets and liabilities and any
valuation allowances that might be required in connection with our ability to
realize deferred tax assets. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>Since we conduct operations internationally, our effective tax
rate has and will continue to depend upon the geographic distribution of our
pre-tax income or losses among locations with varying tax rates and rules. As
the geographic mix of our pre-tax results among various tax jurisdictions
changes, the effective tax rate may vary from period to period. We are also
subject to periodic examination from domestic and foreign tax authorities
regarding the amount of taxes due. These examinations include questions
regarding the timing and amount of deductions and the allocation of income among
various tax jurisdictions. We have established, and periodically reevaluate, an
estimated income tax reserve on our consolidated balance sheet to provide for
the possibility of adverse outcomes in income tax proceedings. While management
believes that we have identified all reasonably identifiable exposures and that
the reserve we have established for identifiable exposures is appropriate under
the circumstances, it is possible that additional exposures exist and that
exposures may be settled at amounts different than the amounts reserved.
</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>We account for income taxes in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards 109, &#147;Accounting for Income Taxes&#148;,
which requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be recognized for the
effect of temporary differences between the book and tax bases of recorded
assets and liabilities. The realization of net deferred tax assets is dependent
upon our ability to generate sufficient future taxable income. Where it is more
likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be
realized, we have provided a valuation allowance. If the realization of those
deferred tax assets in the future is considered more likely than not, an
adjustment to the deferred tax assets would increase net income in the period
such determination is made. In the event that actual results differ from these
estimates or we adjust these estimates in future periods, an adjustment to the
valuation allowance may be required, which could materially affect our
consolidated financial position and results of operations. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><I>Restructuring charges.</I> We have taken restructuring
actions, and may commence further restructuring activities which requires
management to utilize significant estimates related to expenses for severance
and other employee separation costs, lease cancellations, asset impairments and
other exit costs. Should the actual amounts differ from our estimates, the
amount of the restructuring charges could be impacted, which could materially
affect our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Recent Accounting Developments</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(&#147;FASB&#148;) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(&#147;SFAS&#148;) 151, &#147;Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43,
Chapter 4.&#148; SFAS 151 clarifies that abnormal inventory costs such as costs
of idle facilities, excess freight and handling costs, and wasted materials
(spoilage) are required to be recognized as current period charges. SFAS 151
also requires that the allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of
conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facility. The
provisions of SFAS 151 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after June
15, 2005. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of SFAS 151 and
does not expect that the adoption will have a material impact on the
Company&#146;s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards 123 (revised 2004) (SFAS 123R), &#147;Share-Based
Payment&#148;. SFAS 123R replaced SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation (SFAS 123), and superseded Accounting Principles Board Opinion 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS 123R will require the Company to
expense share-based payments, including employee stock options, based on their
fair value. The Company is required to adopt the provisions of SFAS 123R
effective as of the beginning of its first quarter in 2006. SFAS 123R provides
alternative methods of adoption which include prospective application and a
modified retroactive application. The Company is currently evaluating the
available alternatives of adoption, of SFAS 123R. The Company believes the
adoption of SFAS 123R will have a financial statement impact which could be
significant. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP)
109-1, &#147;Application of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes,
to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the American
Jobs Creation Act of 2004.&#148; FSP 109-1 states that qualified domestic
production activities should be accounted for as a special deduction under SFAS
109, &#147;Accounting for Income Taxes,&#148; and not be treated as a rate
reduction. Accordingly, any benefit from the deduction should be reported in the
period in which the deduction is claimed on the tax return. The company is
currently evaluating the effect that the deduction, if any, will have in
subsequent years. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>In December 2004, the FASB also issued FSP 109-2,
&#147;Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation
Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004.&#148; FSP 109-2
provides guidance under SFAS 109, &#147;Accounting for Income Taxes&#148;, with
respect to recording the potential impact of the repatriation provisions of the
American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (&#147;Jobs Act&#148;). FSP 109-2 temporarily
allows companies that are evaluating whether to repatriate foreign earnings
under the Jobs Act to delay recognizing any related taxes until that decision is
made. This pronouncement also requires companies that are considering
repatriating earnings to disclose the status of their evaluation and the
potential amounts being considered for repatriation. The Company has completed
its evaluation of this legislation and FSP 109-2 and will not repatriate any
foreign earnings </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market
Risk.</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
We are exposed to market risks, which include changes in U.S. and international
interest rates as well as changes in currency exchange rates (principally
Sterling, Euros and Canadian dollars) as measured against the U.S. dollar and
each other. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
We have limited involvement with derivative financial instruments and do not use
them for trading purposes. Changes in currency exchange rates as measured
against the U.S. dollar may positively or negatively affect sales, gross
margins, operating expenses and retained earnings as expressed in U.S. dollars.
We may enter into foreign currency options or forward exchange contracts aimed
at limiting in part the impact of certain currency fluctuations, but as of
December 31, 2004 we had no outstanding forward exchange contracts. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to
our variable rate debt. In connection with our United Kingdom term loan
agreement, effective April 30, 2002 we entered into an interest rate collar
agreement to reduce our exposure to market rate fluctuations. At December 31,
2004 the notional amount of the interest rate collar was &#163;5.1 million ($9.7
million at the December 31, 2004 exchange rate) with an interest rate cap of
6.0% and a floor of 4.5%. The interest rate collar expires on April 30, 2005.
</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
The information required by Item 8 of Part II is incorporated herein by
reference to the Consolidated Financial Statements filed with this report; see
Item 15 of Part IV. </FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3><B>Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements with
Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.</B></FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
None.</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.</B></FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting.</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Disclosure Controls and Procedures</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an
evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and the operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
As previously disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K, which we filed on
February 21, 2005, we announced that we would restate previously filed
consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003 and the
first three quarters of 2004 to correct errors in accounting for inventory at
our United Kingdom subsidiary. Management has concluded that the internal
control deficiencies that made the restatements necessary indicate the existence
of a material weakness, as defined by the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board&#146;s Auditing Standard No. 2. Based on this evaluation and due to
existence of the internal control deficiencies described below, our Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2004.
The design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures did not
reduce to a relatively low level of risk the chance or chances that a material
misstatement would occur and not be detected. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
As a result of a review of the subsidiary&#146;s inventory activities for the
fiscal years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, the Company determined that
the errors requiring this restatement were principally a result of changes in
the way certain inventory transactions were processed and recorded and an
inaccurate recording of a period end cut-off. These errors were undetected or
unrecognized as a result of the following weaknesses and deficiencies in the
subsidiary&#146;s controls: </FONT></P>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&#149;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=90%>
Lack of local management review procedures</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&#149;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=90%>Rapid turnover of accounting personnel together with little or no
training as to manual detection procedures necessary to properly close the
books</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&#149;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=90%>Deficiencies in the subsidiary's month-end closing process</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&#149;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=90%>Insufficient formalized procedures to ensure that all relevant
transactions were accounted for</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&#149;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=90%>Breakdown in communication between accounting and operations
personnel</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&#149;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=90%>Insufficient staffing of the accounting function at the
subsidiary</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&#149;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=90%>Inadequate information technology general controls with respect to
inventory movements</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Subsequent to the quarter ended December 31, 2004, we began implementing
remedial measures to address the identified material weakness described above in
connection with the preparation of our financial statements included in our
Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 and in this
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. We have modified our internal
procedures to more accurately identify the types of inventory transactions
processed. This has been combined with additional system reporting to provide
more details to enhance the inventory reconciliation process. This
reconciliation process is also supported by additional management review.
Additional review procedures have been implemented to test cut-off accuracy. We
are continuing to monitor these processes to further improve our procedures as
may be necessary. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Our independent registered public accounting firm has issued a material weakness
letter to the Company which addresses the weaknesses identified above at the
Company&#146;s United Kingdom subsidiary and, as well, addresses inadequate
oversight and control activities on the part of senior management of the Company
over its remote subsidiaries. These matters have been discussed in detail among
management, the audit committee and our independent registered public
accountants. We are in the process of addressing the latter of the items
identified on an immediate and longer-term basis. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Internal Control Over Financial Reporting</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Based on current SEC implementing regulations and assuming that we will be
considered an accelerated filer in 2005 (which will be determined based on our
public float at the end of our second fiscal quarter of 2005), at the end of
fiscal year 2005, Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 will require
that management provide an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company&#146;s
internal control over financial reporting and that the Company&#146;s
independent registered public accounting firm will be required to audit that
assessment. We are taking actions to permit timely compliance with Section 404.
We are in the process of performing the system and procedures documentation,
evaluation and testing for compliance with the requirements of Section 404. We
have dedicated substantial time and resources to the review of our control
processes and procedures, including the engagement of another independent
accounting firm to assist us. We have not completed this process or its
assessment, due to the complexities of our decentralized structure and the
number of accounting systems in use. We have not completed our assessment of our
internal control over financial reporting. We have already identified a number
of weaknesses which, individually or in the aggregate, may be a material
weakness or weaknesses. They are as follows: </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
We have identified a number of internal control deficiencies that may affect the
timeliness and accuracy of recording transactions. The disparate operating and
financial information systems used at certain of our locations have inherent
limitations resulting in a control environment heavily reliant upon manual
review procedures and adjustments. These deficiencies include inadequate or lack
of systems interfaces and the preparation of numerous manual journal entries.
</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
We have identified internal control deficiencies in the information technology
area, including, among others, the lack of program change and project management
controls, inadequate segregation of duties between information technology
department development and production functions, the need for formal information
technology strategic planning, the need for formal documentation of information
security procedures, the need for security around user rights to certain
application systems and the need to implement formal help desk procedures.
</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
We have identified internal control deficiencies related to subsidiary ledger
postings and account reconciliation processes. These deficiencies include
differences between control accounts and subsidiary ledgers which require
extensive manual research to reconcile, some of which can not be resolved on a
timely basis. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
We have identified internal control deficiencies relating to the processing and
reconciliation of intercompany transactions, including the elimination of
intercompany account balances in our financial statement consolidation process.
</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
We have a significant amount of work to do to remediate the items we have
identified. In the course of completing our evaluation and testing we may
identify further deficiencies and weaknesses that will need to be addressed and
remediated. We cannot be assured that we will be able to correct all such
internal control deficiencies in a timely manner and may find that a material
weakness or weaknesses continues to exist. As a result, management may not be
able to issue a positive opinion on the effectiveness of the Company&#146;s
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that our disclosure
controls and procedures will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system,
no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not
absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further,
the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource
constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their
costs. Because of the inherent limitations in control systems, misstatements due
to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. These limitations include the
circumstances that breakdowns can occur as a result of error or mistake, the
exercise of judgment by individuals or that controls can be circumvented by acts
of misconduct. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Our management is not aware of any changes in internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2004 that
materially affected, or were reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting. </FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=CENTER><FONT SIZE=3><B>PART III</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
The information required by Item 10 of Part III is hereby incorporated by
reference from the Company's Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders (the &quot;Proxy Statement&quot;). </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Item 11. Executive Compensation.</B></FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
The information required by Item 11 of Part III is hereby incorporated by
reference from the Proxy Statement.</FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3><B>Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.</B></FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
The information required by Item 12 of Part III is hereby incorporated by
reference from the Proxy Statement.</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions.</B></FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
The information required by Item 13 of Part III is hereby incorporated by
reference from the Proxy Statement.</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.</B></FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
The information required by Item 14 of Part III is hereby incorporated by
reference from the Proxy Statement.</FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=CENTER><FONT SIZE=3><B>PART IV</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B>Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statements, Schedules and Reports
on Form 8-K.</B></FONT></P>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>(a)</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>1.</TD>
<TD WIDTH=50%>The Consolidated Financial Statements of Systemax Inc.</TD>
<TD WIDTH=35%><U>Reference</U></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=15%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=50%>Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm</TD>
<TD WIDTH=35%>36</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=15%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=50%>Consolidated Balance Sheets</TD>
<TD WIDTH=35%>37</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=15%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=50%>Consolidated Statements of Operations</TD>
<TD WIDTH=35%>38</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=15%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=50%>Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity</TD>
<TD WIDTH=35%>39</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=15%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=50%>Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows</TD>
<TD WIDTH=35%>40</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=15%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=50%>Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements</TD>
<TD WIDTH=35%>41 - 52</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>
<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=10%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>2.</TD>
<TD WIDTH=85%>
Financial Statement Schedules:<BR>
<BR>
Schedules not included with this additional financial data have been omitted
because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the
Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes thereto.</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=10%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>3.</TD>
<TD WIDTH=85%>
Exhibits.</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<PRE>
<FONT SIZE=1>
               <B>Exhibit
               No.                      Description
               -------                  -----------</B>
                   3.1              Composite Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant, as amended <SUP>9</SUP>
                   3.2              By-laws of Registrant <SUP>1</SUP>
                   4.1              Stockholders Agreement <SUP>2</SUP>
                  10.1              Form of 1995 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan <SUP>3*</SUP>
                  10.2              Form of 1999 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan as amended <SUP>13*</SUP>
                  10.3              Lease  Agreement dated September 20, 1988 between the Company and Addwin Realty
                                    Associates (Port Washington facility)<SUP>1</SUP>
                  10.4              Amendment to Lease Agreement dated September 29, 1998 between the Company and
                                    Addwin Realty Associates (Port Washington facility)<SUP>6</SUP>
                  10.5              Lease  Agreement  dated as of July 17,  1997  between the Company and South Bay
                                    Industrials Company (Compton facility)<SUP>4</SUP>
                  10.6              Build-to-Suit  Lease  Agreement dated April,  1995 among the Company,  American
                                    National  Bank and  Trust  Company  of  Chicago  and  Walsh,  Higgins &amp; Company
                                    (Naperville facility)<SUP>1</SUP>
                  10.7              Lease  Agreement  dated  September  17, 1998  between  Tiger  Direct,  Inc. and
                                    Keystone Miami Property Holding Corp. (Miami facility)<SUP>5</SUP>
                  10.8              Royalty  Agreement  dated June 30, 1986 between the Company and Richard  Leeds,
                                    Bruce Leeds and Robert Leeds, and Addendum thereto<SUP>1</SUP>
                  10.9              Form of 1995 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors <SUP>3*</SUP>
                 10.10              Consulting  Agreement  dated as of  January 1, 1996  between  the  Company  and
                                    Gilbert Rothenberg <SUP>3*</SUP>
                 10.11              Separation  Agreement  and  General  Release  between  the  Company  and Robert
                                    Dooley, dated March 5, 2004<SUP>*</SUP>
                 10.12              Employment  Agreement  dated as of December  12,  1997  between the Company and
                                    Steven M. Goldschein <SUP>4*</SUP>
                 10.13              Loan and Security Agreement, dated June 13, 2001, between The Chase Manhattan
                                    Bank (as Lender and Agent) and TransAmerica Business Capital Corporation (as
                                    Lender and Co-Agent) with the Company and certain subsidiaries of the Company
                                    (as Borrowers), as amended, the &#147;Chase Loan Agreement&#148;)<SUP> 7</SUP>
                 10.14              Amendment No. 1, dated as of September 1, 2001, to the Chase Loan Agreement <SUP>8</SUP>
                 10.15              Amendment No. 2, dated as of December 13, 2001, to the Chase Loan Agreement <SUP>9</SUP>
                 10.16              Amendment No. 3, dated as of December 20, 2001, to the Chase Loan Agreement <SUP>9</SUP>
                 10.17              Amendment No. 4, dated as of April 18, 2002, to the Chase Loan Agreement <SUP>10</SUP>
                 10.18              Amendment No. 5, dated as of June 30, 2002, to the Chase Loan Agreement <SUP>11</SUP>
                 10.19              Amendment No. 6, dated as of September 22, 2003, to the Chase Loan Agreement <SUP>14</SUP>
                 10.20              Amendment No. 7, dated as of November 17, 2003, to the Chase Loan Agreement <SUP>15</SUP>
                 10.21              Amendment No. 8, dated as of May 10, 2004, to the Chase Loan Agreement <SUP>15</SUP>
                 10.22              Amendment No. 9, dated as of July 2, 2004, to the Chase Loan Agreement <SUP>16</SUP>
                 10.23              Amendment No. 10, dated as of December 9, 2004, to the Chase Loan Agreement <SUP>18</SUP>
                 10.24              Amendment No. 11, dated as of March 8, 2005, to the Chase Loan Agreement <SUP>19</SUP>
                 10.25              Promissory Note of Systemax Suwanee LLC, dated as of April 18, 2002
                                    payable to the order of New York Life Insurance Company in the original
                                    principal sum of $8,400,000 <SUP>10</SUP>
                 10.26              Deed to Secure Debt, Assignment of Leases and Rents and Security Agreement,
                                    dated as of April 18, 2002 from Systemax Suwanee LLC to New York Life
                                    Insurance Company <SUP>10</SUP>
                 10.27              Employment Agreement entered into on October 12, 2004 but effective as of June
                                    1, 2004 between the Company and Gilbert Fiorentino <SUP>17*</SUP>
                 10.28              Restricted Stock Unit Agreement entered into on October 12, 2004 but effective
                                    as of June 1, 2004 between the Company and Gilbert Fiorentino <SUP>17*</SUP>
                    14              Corporate Ethics Policy for Officers, Directors and Employees (revised as of
                                    March 30, 2005) <SUP>20</SUP>
                    19              Specimen stock certificate of Registrant <SUP>9</SUP>
                    21              Subsidiaries of the Registrant
                    23              Consent of experts and counsel: Consent of Independent Public Accountants
                  31.1              Certification  of the Chief  Executive  Officer  pursuant to Section 302 of the
                                    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                  31.2              Certification  of the Chief  Financial  Officer  pursuant to Section 302 of the
                                    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                  32.1              Certification  of the Chief  Executive  Officer  pursuant to Section 906 of the
                                    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                  32.2              Certification  of the Chief  Financial  Officer  pursuant to Section 906 of the
                                    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                  99.1              Charter of the Audit Committee of the Company's Board of Directors,  as revised
                                    February 28, 20031<SUP>2</SUP>
                  99.2              Charter of the Compensation  Committee of the Company's Board of Directors,  as
                                    approved February 28, 2003<SUP>12</SUP>
                  99.3              Charter  of the  Nominating/Corporate  Governance  Committee  of the  Company's
                                    Board of Directors, as approved February 28, 2003<SUP>12</SUP>
                  99.4              Annual CEO Certification to the New York Stock Exchange, dated March 26, 2004<SUP>14</SUP>
</FONT>
</PRE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>*</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>
<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>1</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's registration
statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-92052).</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>2</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's quarterly report
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 1995.</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>3</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's registration
statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-1852).</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>4</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>5</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>Incorporated herein by reference to the Company&#146;s quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 1998.</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>6</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>Incorporated herein by reference to the Company&#146;s annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>7</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>Incorporated herein by reference to the Company&#146;s report on
Form 8-K dated June 13, 2001</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>8</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>Incorporated herein by reference to the Company&#146;s quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2001.</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>9</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>Incorporated herein by reference to the Company&#146;s annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>10</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>Incorporated herein by reference to the Company&#146;s quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2002.</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>11</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>Incorporated herein by reference to the Company&#146;s quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002.</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>12</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>Incorporated herein by reference to the Company&#146;s annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>13</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>Incorporated herein by reference to the Company&#146;s report on
Form 8-K dated May 20, 2003.</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>14</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>Incorporated herein by reference to the Company&#146;s annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>15</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>Incorporated herein by reference to the Company&#146;s quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004.</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>16</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>Incorporated herein by reference to the Company&#146;s quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004.</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>17</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's report on Form
8-K dated October 12, 2004.</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>18</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's report on Form
8-K dated December 9, 2004.</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>19</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's report on Form
8-K dated March 17, 2005.</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>20</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's report on Form
8-K dated March 30, 2005.</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;(b)
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Reports on Form 8-K.</FONT></P>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5% ALIGN=LEFT>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=90%>A report on Form 8-K was filed by the Company on October 18, 2004
regarding the Company&#146;s entry an employment agreement and restricted stock
unit agreement with Gilbert Fiorentino, the Chief Executive Officer of the
Company&#146;s Tiger Direct, Inc. subsidiary and a director of the Company.</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5% ALIGN=LEFT>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=90%>A report on Form 8-K was filed by the Company on November 9, 2004
regarding the Company&#146;s financial results for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2004 and other matters.</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5% ALIGN=LEFT>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=90%>A report on Form 8-K was filed by the Company on December 10, 2004
regarding an amendment to the Company&#146;s Loan and Security Agreement with JP
Morgan Chase Bank and other lenders.</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<PAGE>

<P ALIGN=CENTER><FONT SIZE=3><B>SIGNATURES</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. </FONT></P>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=50%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=50%>
SYSTEMAX INC.<BR>
<BR>
By: <U>/s/ RICHARD LEEDS</U><BR>
<BR>
Richard Leeds<BR>
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer<BR>
<BR>
Date: April 15, 2005
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report
has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and
in the capacities and on the dates indicated. </FONT></P>

<PRE>
    <B>Signature                           Title                              Date
    ---------                           -----                              ----</B>

/s/ RICHARD LEEDS         Chairman and Chief Executive Officer        April 15, 2005
- -----------------            (Principal Executive Officer)
    Richard Leeds

/s/ BRUCE LEEDS                     Vice Chairman                     April 15, 2005
- ---------------
    Bruce Leeds

/s/ ROBERT LEEDS                    Vice Chairman                     April 15, 2005
- ----------------
    Robert Leeds

/s/ STEVEN M. GOLDSCHEIN    Senior Vice President and Chief           April 15, 2005
- ------------------------           Financial Officer
    Steven Goldschein        (Principal Financial Officer)

/s/ MICHAEL J. SPEILLER      Vice President and Controller            April 15, 2005
- -----------------------      (Principal Accounting Officer)
    Michael J. Speiller

/s/ GILBERT FIORENTINO                 Director                       April 15, 2005
- ----------------------
    Gilbert Fiorentino

/s/ ROBERT D. ROSENTHAL                Director                       April 15, 2005
- -----------------------
    Robert D. Rosenthal

/s/ STACY DICK                         Director                       April 15, 2005
- --------------
    Stacy Dick

/s/ ANN R. LEVEN                       Director                       April 15, 2005
- ----------------
    Ann R. Leven
</PRE>

<P ALIGN=CENTER><FONT SIZE=3><B>REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>The Shareholders and Board of Directors of<BR>
SYSTEMAX INC.: </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Systemax Inc. and subsidiaries (the &#147;Company&#148;) as of December 31, 2004
and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders&#146; equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2004. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company&#146;s management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company
is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its
internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of
internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company&#146;s internal
control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Systemax Inc. and
subsidiaries at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations
and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 2004, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements,
the Company changed its method for accounting for goodwill and other intangible
assets in 2002 to conform to the Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement
No. 142, &#147;Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets&#148;. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>/s/ DELOITTE &amp; TOUCHE LLP<BR>
New York, New York<BR>
April 13, 2005</FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=CENTER><FONT SIZE=3><B>SYSTEMAX INC.<BR>
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS<BR>
DECEMBER 31, 2004 AND 2003<BR>
(IN THOUSANDS, except for share data)</B></FONT></P>

<PRE><FONT SIZE=1>
                                                                                        <B>2004</B>            2003
                                                                                        ----            ----
ASSETS:
   CURRENT ASSETS:
      Cash and cash equivalents                                                      <B>$36,257</B>         $38,702
      Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $11,318 (2004) and $10,000 (2003)    <B>153,724</B>         152,435
      Inventories                                                                    <B>176,227</B>         133,905
      Prepaid expenses and other current assets                                       <B>24,888</B>          26,849
     Deferred income tax assets, net                                                   <B>8,812</B>          10,132
                                                                                    --------        --------
           Total current assets                                                      <B>399,908</B>         362,023

   PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net                                                 <B>65,563</B>          68,647
   DEFERRED INCOME TAX ASSETS, net                                                    <B>18,268</B>          15,673
   OTHER ASSETS                                                                          <B>561</B>             376
                                                                                    --------        --------

              TOTAL                                                                 <B>$484,300</B>        $446,719
                                                                                    ========        ========

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:
   CURRENT LIABILITIES:
      Short-term borrowings, including current portions of long-term debt            <B>$16,560</B>         $20,814
       Accounts payable                                                              <B>161,864</B>         144,662
       Accrued expenses and other current liabilities                                 <B>60,756</B>          51,037
                                                                                    --------        --------
          Total current liabilities                                                  <B>239,180</B>         216,513
                                                                                    --------        --------

   LONG-TERM DEBT                                                                     <B>17,099</B>          18,353
   OTHER LIABILITIES                                                                   <B>1,505</B>           1,768

   COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

   SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:
   Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share, authorized 25 million shares, issued none
   Common stock, par value $.01 per share, authorized 150 million shares, issued
       38,231,990 shares; outstanding 34,432,799 (2004) and 34,288,068 (2003) shares     <B>382</B>             382
   Additional paid-in capital                                                        <B>180,530</B>         175,343
   Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax                                  <B>4,093</B>           1,933
   Retained earnings                                                                  <B>91,307</B>          78,757
   Common stock in treasury at cost - 3,799,191 (2004) and 3,943,922 (2003) shares   <B>(44,630)</B>        (46,330)

   Unearned restricted stock compensation                                             <B>(5,166)</B>              -
                                                                                    --------        --------
                        Total shareholders' equity                                   <B>226,516</B>         210,085
                                                                                    --------        --------

                TOTAL                                                               <B>$484,300</B>        $446,719
                                                                                    ========        ========

See notes to consolidated financial statements.
</FONT></PRE>

<PAGE>

<P ALIGN=CENTER><FONT SIZE=3><B>SYSTEMAX INC.<BR>
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS<BR>
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2003 AND 2002<BR>
(IN THOUSANDS, except per common share amounts)</B></FONT></P>

<PRE><FONT SIZE=1>
                                                                               <B>2004</B>             2003             2002
                                                                               ----             ----             ----
Net sales                                                                <B>$1,927,835</B>       $1,657,778       $1,551,517
Cost of sales                                                             <B>1,637,452</B>        1,392,745        1,285,929
                                                                     ---------------  ---------------  ---------------
Gross profit                                                                <B>290,383</B>          265,033          265,588
Selling, general and administrative expenses                                <B>260,111</B>          251,460          256,075
Restructuring and other charges                                               <B>7,356</B>            1,726           17,294
Goodwill impairment                                                                            2,560
                                                                     ---------------  ---------------  ---------------
Income (loss) from operations                                                <B>22,916</B>            9,287           (7,781)
Interest and other income, net                                                 <B>(630)</B>            (755)            (427)
Interest expense                                                              <B>3,073</B>            2,344            1,653
                                                                     ---------------  ---------------  ---------------
Income (loss) before income taxes                                            <B>20,473</B>            7,698           (9,007)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes                                          <B>7,923</B>            4,352           (1,039)
                                                                     ---------------  ---------------  ---------------
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting
    principle, net of tax                                                    <B>12,550</B>            3,346           (7,968)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax                                               (50,971)
                                                                     ---------------  ---------------  ---------------
Net income (loss)                                                           <B>$12,550</B>           $3,346         $(58,939)
                                                                     ===============  ===============  ===============

Net income (loss) per common share, basic:
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting
    principle, net of tax                                                      <B>$.37</B>             $.10            $(.23)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax                                                 (1.50)
                                                                     ---------------  ---------------  ---------------
Net income (loss)                                                              <B>$.37</B>             $.10           $(1.73)
                                                                     ===============  ===============  ===============

Net income (loss) per common share, diluted:
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle, net of tax                                                          <B>$.35</B>             $.10            $(.23)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax                                                 (1.50)
                                                                     ---------------  ---------------  ---------------
Net income (loss)                                                              <B>$.35</B>             $.10           $(1.73)
                                                                     ===============  ===============  ===============

Weighted average common and common equivalent shares:
   Basic                                                                     <B>34,373</B>           34,164           34,104
                                                                     ===============  ===============  ===============
   Diluted                                                                   <B>35,489</B>           34,880           34,104
                                                                     ===============  ===============  ===============

See notes to consolidated financial statements.
</FONT></PRE>

<PAGE>

<P ALIGN=CENTER><FONT SIZE=3><B>SYSTEMAX INC.<BR>
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY<BR>
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2003 AND 2002<BR>
(IN THOUSANDS)</B></FONT></P>

<PRE><FONT SIZE=1>
                               Common Stock
                              ---------------
                               Number                              Accumulated
                                 of                                   Other                  Unearned
                               Shares         Additional          Comprehensive   Treasury  Restricted  Comprehensive
                              Outstand         Paid-in   Retained Income (Loss),   Stock,     Stock     Income (Loss),
                                ing    Amount  Capital   Earnings   Net of Tax     At Cost Compensation   Net of Tax
                              -------- ------ ---------- -------- --------------  -------- ------------ --------------

Balances, January 1, 2002       34,104   $382   $176,743 $134,350        $(8,038) $(48,489)

Change in cumulative
    translation adjustment                                                 5,908                                $5,908
Net loss                                                  (58,939)                                             (58,939)
                              -------- ------ ---------- -------- --------------  -------- ------------ --------------

Total comprehensive loss                                                                                      $(53,031)
                                                                                                        ==============

Balances, December 31, 2002     34,104    382    176,743   75,411         (2,130)  (48,489)

Change in cumulative
    translation adjustment                                                 4,063                                $4,063
Exercise of stock options          184            (1,740)                            2,159
Tax benefit of employee
    stock plans                                      340
Net income                                                  3,346                                                3,346
                              -------- ------ ---------- -------- --------------  -------- ------------ --------------

Total comprehensive income                                                                                      $7,409
                                                                                                        ==============

Balances, December 31, 2003     34,288    382    175,343   78,757          1,933   (46,330)

Change in cumulative
    translation adjustment                                                 <B>2,160                                $2,160</B>
Exercise of stock options          <B>145              (741)                            1,700</B>
Tax benefit of employee
    stock plans                                      <B>188</B>
Grant of restricted stock
    units                                          <B>5,740                                        $(5,740)</B>
Amortization of unearned
    restricted stock
    compensation                                                                                    <B>574</B>
Net income                                                 <B>12,550                                               12,550</B>
                              -------- ------ ---------- -------- --------------  -------- ------------ --------------

Total comprehensive income                                                                                     <B>$14,170</B>
                                                                                                        ==============
Balances, December 31, 2004     <B>34,433   $382   $180,530  $91,307         $4,093  $(44,630)     $(5,166)</B>
                              ======== ====== ========== ======== ==============  ======== ============

See notes to consolidated financial statements.
</FONT></PRE>

<PAGE>

<P ALIGN=CENTER><FONT SIZE=3><B>SYSTEMAX INC.<BR>
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS<BR>
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2003 AND 2002<BR>
(IN THOUSANDS)</B></FONT></P>

<PRE><FONT SIZE=1>
                                                                                <B>2004</B>            2003           2002
                                                                                ----            ----           ----
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
   Net income (loss)                                                         <B>$12,550</B>          $3,346       $(58,939)
   Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by
   (used in) operating activities:
       Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax                                       50,971
       Goodwill impairment                                                                     2,560
       Loss on dispositions and abandonment                                    <B>1,444</B>             595         14,843
       Depreciation and amortization, net                                     <B>11,314</B>          13,938         13,652
       Provision for deferred income taxes                                    <B>(3,585)</B>         (2,818)        (3,475)
       Tax benefit of employee stock plans                                       <B>188</B>             340
       Provision for returns and doubtful accounts                             <B>7,159</B>           3,906          4,581
       Compensation expense related to equity compensation plans               <B>1,374</B>
   Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
       Accounts receivable                                                    <B>(2,230)</B>          6,182         (5,922)
       Inventories                                                           <B>(39,936)</B>        (30,089)        (2,644)
       Prepaid expenses and other current assets                               <B>2,507</B>           7,972         (8,422)
       Income taxes payable/receivable                                         <B>8,966</B>          (3,915)         7,755
       Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities       <B>12,873</B>          (8,624)        (7,532)
                                                                          -----------     -----------   ------------
           Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities                <B>12,624</B>          (6,607)         4,868
                                                                          -----------     -----------   ------------

CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
   Investments in property, plant and equipment                               <B>(8,583)</B>         (8,699)       (15,367)
   Proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment                      <B>247</B>              11            635
   Purchase of minority interest                                                              (2,560)
                                                                          -----------     -----------   ------------
           Net cash used in investing activities                              <B>(8,336)</B>        (11,248)       (14,732)
                                                                          -----------     -----------   ------------

CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
   Issuance of long-term borrowings and capital lease obligations                              1,534         18,879
   Proceeds (repayments) of borrowings from banks                             <B>(5,254)</B>         (2,951)        15,253
   Repayments of long-term debt and capital lease obligations                 <B>(1,768)</B>         (1,257)          (348)
   Issuance of common stock                                                      <B>331</B>             419
                                                                          -----------     -----------   ------------
           Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities                <B>(6,691)</B>         (2,255)        33,784
                                                                          -----------     -----------   ------------

EFFECTS OF EXCHANGE RATES ON CASH                                                <B>(42)</B>         (4,183)         2,611
                                                                          -----------     -----------   ------------

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS                          <B>(2,445)</B>        (24,293)        26,531
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - BEGINNING OF YEAR                                 <B>38,702</B>          62,995         36,464
                                                                          -----------     -----------   ------------

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - END OF YEAR                                      <B>$36,257</B>         $38,702        $62,995
                                                                          ===========     ===========   ============

Supplemental disclosures:
       Interest paid                                                          <B>$3,385</B>          $2,697         $1,375
                                                                          ===========     ===========   ============
       Income taxes paid                                                      <B>$4,676</B>         $13,840         $5,397
                                                                          ===========     ===========   ============

Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing activities:
       Deferred stock-based compensation related to restricted unit stock
       granted                                                                <B>$5,740</B>               -              -
                                                                          ===========     ===========  =============

See notes to consolidated financial statements
</FONT></PRE>

<PAGE>

<P ALIGN=CENTER><FONT SIZE=3><B>SYSTEMAX INC.<BR>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS<BR>
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2003 AND 2002</B></FONT></P>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%><B>1.</B></TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%><B>SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES</B></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
<I><U>Principles of Consolidation</U></I> - The accompanying consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of Systemax Inc. and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries (collectively, the &#147;Company&#148; or &#147;Systemax&#148;).
All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation. The Company began consolidating a 50%-owned joint venture in the
first quarter of 2004 in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board
Interpretation 46 (Revised) (&#147;FIN 46R&#148;), &quot;Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities (see &#147;Recent Accounting Pronouncements&#148;,
below). The Company previously used the equity method of accounting for this
investment. The results of operations of this investee are not material to the
results of operations of the Company.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
Certain items in the consolidated financial statements of prior years have been
reclassified to conform to the current year&#146;s presentation.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
<I><U>Use of Estimates In Financial Statements</U></I> - The preparation of
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
<I><U>Fiscal Year</U></I> - The Company&#146;s fiscal year ends on December 31.
The Company&#146;s North American computer business has a 52 or 53 week fiscal
year that ends on the last Saturday of the calendar year. Fiscal years 2004,
2003 and 2002 consisted of 52 weeks for this business.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
<I><U>Foreign Currency Translation</U></I> - The financial statements of the
Company&#146;s foreign entities are translated into U.S. dollars, the reporting
currency, using year-end exchange rates for balance sheet items and average
exchange rates for the statement of operations items. The translation
differences are recorded as a separate component of shareholders'
equity.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
<I><U>Cash and Cash Equivalents</U></I> - The Company considers amounts held in
money market accounts and other short-term investments with an original maturity
date of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company&#146;s
investments in cash equivalents are classified as debt securities
available-for-sale and are stated at fair market value. Unrealized holding gains
and losses are not significant for any of the years presented.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
<I><U>Inventories</U></I> - Inventories consist primarily of finished goods and
are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is determined by using the
first-in, first-out method.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
<I><U>Property, Plant and Equipment</U></I> - Property, plant and equipment is
stated at cost. Depreciation of furniture, fixtures and equipment is on the
straight-line or accelerated method over their estimated useful lives ranging
from three to ten years. Depreciation of buildings is on the straight-line
method over estimated useful lives of 30 to 50 years. Leasehold improvements are
amortized over the lesser of the useful lives or the term of the respective
leases.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
<I><U>Capitalized Software Costs</U></I> - The Company capitalizes purchased
software ready for service and capitalizes software development costs incurred
on significant projects from the time that the preliminary project stage is
completed and management commits to funding a project until the project is
substantially complete and the software is ready for its intended use.
Capitalized costs include materials and service costs and payroll and
payroll-related costs. Capitalized software costs are amortized using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the underlying system,
generally five years.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
<I><U>Goodwill</U></I> - The cost in excess of fair value of net assets of
businesses acquired is recorded in the consolidated balance sheets as
&#147;Goodwill.&#148; In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (&#147;SFAS&#148;) No. 142, &#147;Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets&#148;, the Company ceased amortization of goodwill effective January 1,
2002. The Company completed the transitional impairment analysis required under
SFAS 142 during 2002, which resulted in an implied fair value of goodwill of
zero. See Note 2 for the impact of the adoption of SFAS 142 on the consolidated
financial statements
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
<I><U>Evaluation of Long-lived Assets</U></I> - Long-lived assets are evaluated
for recoverability in accordance with SFAS 144, &#147;Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets&#148;, whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that an asset may have been impaired. In evaluating an
asset for recoverability, the Company estimates the future cash flows expected
to result from the use of the asset and eventual disposition. If the sum of the
expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less
than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss, equal to the excess
of the carrying amount over the fair market value of the asset is
recognized.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
<I><U>Product Warranties</U></I> - Provisions for estimated future expenses
relating to product warranties for the Company&#146;s assembled PCs are recorded
as cost of sales when revenue is recognized. Liability estimates are determined
based on management judgment considering such factors as the number of units
sold, historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims and the likely current
cost of corrective action.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
<I><U>Income Taxes</U></I> - Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized
for the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between financial
reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using enacted
tax laws and rates. Valuation allowances are provided for deferred tax assets to
the extent it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets will not be
recoverable against future taxable income.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
<I><U>Revenue Recognition and Accounts Receivable</U></I> - The Company
recognizes sales of products, including shipping revenue, when persuasive
evidence of an order arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the sales price
is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. Generally,
these criteria are met at the time the product is shipped under FOB shipping
terms. Allowances for estimated subsequent customer returns, rebates and sales
incentives are provided when revenues are recorded. Costs incurred for the
shipping and handling of its products are recorded as cost of sales. Revenue
from extended warranty and support contracts on the Company&#146;s assembled PCs
is deferred and recognized over the contract period.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
We recognize revenue for our software sales in accordance with Emerging Issues
Task Force (&#147;EITF&#148;) Issue No. 00-21, &#147;Revenue Arrangements with
Multiple Deliverables&#148;. Hosting and service revenues are recognized on a
monthly basis over the terms of the contracts. Professional services and other
revenues, when sold with hosting services, are recognized as the services are
rendered.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
Accounts receivable are shown in the consolidated balance sheets net of
allowances for doubtful collections and subsequent customer returns. The changes
in these allowance accounts are summarized as follows (in
thousands):
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<PRE>
                                                         Years ended December 31,
                                                     <B>2004</B>          2003          2002
                                                     ----          ----          ----
          Balance, beginning of year              <B>$10,000</B>       $11,275       $11,120
          Charged to expense                        <B>7,159</B>         3,906         4,581
          Deductions                               <B>(5,841)</B>       (5,181)       (4,426)
                                                   ------        ------        ------
          Balance, end of year                    <B>$11,318</B>       $10,000       $11,275
                                                  =======       =======       =======
</PRE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
<I><U>Advertising Costs</U></I> - Advertising costs, consisting primarily of
catalog preparation, printing and postage expenditures are amortized over the
period of catalog distribution during which the benefits are expected.
Advertising expenditures relating to the Company's national advertising campaign
and other television advertising costs are expensed in the period the
advertising takes place.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
Advertising costs, net of rebates from vendors, of $43.8 million in 2004, $43.7
million in 2003 and $44.1 million in 2002 are included in the accompanying
Consolidated Statements of Operations. Effective January 1, 2003 the Company
adopted EITF Issue No. 02-16, &#147;Accounting by a Customer (Including a
Reseller) for Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor.&#148; EITF 02-16
requires that consideration received from vendors, such as advertising support
funds, be accounted for as a reduction of cost of sales unless certain
conditions are met showing that the funds are used for a specific program
entirely funded by an individual vendor. If these specific requirements related
to individual vendors are met, the consideration is accounted for as a reduction
in the related expense category, such as advertising expense. EITF 02-16 applies
to all agreements modified or entered into on or after January&#160;1, 2003. The
Company utilizes advertising programs to support vendors, including catalogs,
internet and magazine advertising, and receives payments and credits from
vendors, including consideration pursuant to volume incentive programs and
cooperative marketing programs. As a result of prospectively adopting EITF
02-16, the Company has recorded $19.2 million for the year ended December 31,
2004 and $14.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 of vendor
consideration as a reduction of cost of sales. Adopting EITF 02-16 had no impact
on income (loss) from operations, as the vendor consideration recorded as a
reduction of cost of sales would previously have been recorded as a reduction of
advertising expense.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
Prepaid expenses at December 31, 2004 and 2003 include deferred advertising
costs of $5.6 million and $4.2 million, respectively, which are reflected as an
expense during the periods benefited, typically the subsequent fiscal quarter.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
<I><U>Research and Development Costs</U></I> - Costs incurred in connection with
research and development are expensed as incurred. Such expenses were
approximately $411,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004, $800,000 for the
year ended December 31, 2003 and $1,036,000 for the year ended December 31,
2002.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
<I><U>Derivative Financial Instruments</U></I> - In accordance with the
provisions of SFAS 133, &quot;Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities&quot;, as amended, all of the Company&#146;s derivative financial
instruments are recognized as either assets or liabilities in the consolidated
balance sheets based on their fair values. Changes in the fair values are
reported in earnings or other comprehensive income depending on the use of the
derivative and whether it qualifies for hedge accounting. Derivative instruments
are designated and accounted for as either a hedge of a recognized asset or
liability (fair value hedge) or a hedge of a forecasted transaction (cash flow
hedge). For derivatives designated as effective cash flow hedges, changes in
fair values are recognized in other comprehensive income. Changes in fair values
related to fair value hedges as well as the ineffective portion of cash flow
hedges are recognized in earnings (see Note 6).
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
The Company does not use derivative instruments for speculative or trading
purposes. Derivative instruments may be used to manage exposures related to
changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rate risk on variable
rate indebtedness.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
<I><U>Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share</U></I> - The Company calculates net
income (loss) per share in accordance with SFAS 128, &#147;Earnings Per
Share&#148;. Net income (loss) per common share-basic was calculated based upon
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the respective
periods presented. Net income (loss) per common share-diluted was calculated
based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and included
the equivalent shares for dilutive securities outstanding during the respective
periods except in loss periods, where the effect is anti-dilutive. The dilutive
effect of outstanding options issued by the Company are reflected in net income
per share &#150; diluted using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury
stock method, options will only have a dilutive effect when the average market
price of common stock during the period exceeds the exercise price of the
options. In 2004, 1,116,000 of equivalent common shares and in 2003, 715,000 of
equivalent common shares were included for the diluted calculation. The weighted
average number of stock options outstanding excluded from the computation of
diluted earnings per share was 587,000 in 2004, 697,000 in 2003 and 1,149,000 in
2002 due to their antidilutive effect.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
<I><U>Comprehensive Income (Loss)</U></I> - Comprehensive income (loss) consists
of net income (loss) and foreign currency translation adjustments and is
included in the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders&#146; Equity.
Comprehensive income (loss) was $14,170,000 in 2004, $7,409,000 in 2003 and
$(53,031,000) in 2002, net of tax effects on foreign currency translation
adjustments of $(1,180,000) in 2004, $(3,030,000) in 2003 and $3,483,000 in
2002.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
<I><U>Stock-based Compensation</U></I> - The Company has three stock-based
compensation plans, two of which are for employees, consultants and advisors and
the third of which is for non-employee directors, which are more fully described
in Note 8. The Company has elected to follow the accounting provisions of
Accounting Principles Board (&#147;APB&#148;) Opinion 25, &#147;Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees&#148; for stock-based compensation and to provide the
pro forma disclosures required under SFAS 148, &#147;Accounting for Stock-based
Compensation &#150; Transition and Disclosure&#148;. No stock-based employee
compensation cost is reflected in net income (loss), as all options granted
under the plans have an exercise price equal to the market value of the
underlying stock on the date of grant. The following table illustrates the
effect on net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share had compensation costs
of the plans been determined under a fair value alternative method as stated in
SFAS 123, &#147;Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation&#148; (in thousands,
except per share data):
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<PRE><FONT SIZE=1>
                                                                         <B>2004</B>            2003             2002
                                                                         ----            ----             ----
     Net income (loss) - as reported                                  <B>$12,550</B>          $3,346         $(58,939)
     Stock-based employee compensation expense determined under
         fair value based method, net of related tax effects              <B>409</B>             544              713
                                                                       ------           -----           ------
     Pro forma net income (loss)                                      <B>$12,141</B>          $2,802         $(59,652)
                                                                      =======          ======         ========

     Basic net income (loss) per common share:
     Net income (loss) - as reported                                     <B>$.37</B>           $ .10           $(1.73)
                                                                         ====           =====           ======
     Net income (loss) - pro forma                                       <B>$.35</B>           $ .08           $(1.75)
                                                                         ====           =====           ======

     Diluted net income (loss) per common share:
     Net income (loss) - as reported                                     <B>$.35</B>           $ .10           $(1.73)
                                                                         ====           =====           ======
     Net income (loss) - pro forma                                       <B>$.34</B>           $ .08           $(1.75)
                                                                         ====           =====           ======
</FONT></PRE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
The fair value of options granted was estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<PRE><FONT SIZE=1>
                                                          <B>2004</B>          2003          2002
                                                          ----          ----          ----
     Expected dividend yield                                <B>0%</B>            0%            0%
     Risk-free interest rate                              <B>5.5%</B>          5.9%          5.6%
     Expected volatility                                 <B>46.0%</B>         76.0%         71.0%
     Expected life in years                               <B>2.36</B>          2.41          2.52
</FONT></PRE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
The weighted average contractual life of the stock options outstanding was 7.4
years at December 31, 2004, 7.7 years at December 31, 2003 and 7.8 years at
December 31, 2002.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%><I><U>Recent Accounting Pronouncements</U></I></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
In January&#160;2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(&#147;FASB&#148;) issued Interpretation 46 (&#147;FIN 46&#148;),
&quot;Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,&#148; which requires the
consolidation of variable interest entities (&#147;VIE&#148;), as defined, by
their primary beneficiaries if the entities do not effectively disperse risks
among parties involved. In December&#160;2003, the FASB issued FIN 46-R to
address certain FIN 46 implementation issues. This interpretation clarifies the
application of Accounting Research Bulletin 51, &#147;Consolidated Financial
Statements&#148;, for companies that have interests in entities that are VIEs as
defined under FIN&#160;46. According to this interpretation, if a company has an
interest in a VIE and is at risk for a majority of the VIE's expected losses or
receives a majority of the VIE's expected gains it shall consolidate the VIE.
The Company has adopted FIN 46R and began consolidating a 50%-owned joint
venture in the first quarter of 2004. This consolidation did not have a material
impact on the Company&#146;s consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 151, &#147;Inventory Costs, an amendment
of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4.&#148; SFAS 151 clarifies that abnormal inventory costs
such as costs of idle facilities, excess freight and handling costs, and wasted
materials (spoilage) are required to be recognized as current period charges.
SFAS 151 also requires that the allocation of fixed production overheads to the
costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facility.
The provisions of SFAS 151 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after
June 15, 2005. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of SFAS 151
and does not expect that the adoption will have a material impact on the
Company&#146;s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 123 (revised 2004) (SFAS 123R),
&#147;Share-Based Payment.&#148; SFAS 123R replaced SFAS 123 and superseded APB
25. SFAS 123R will require the Company to expense share-based payments,
including employee stock options, based on their fair value. The Company is
required to adopt the provisions of SFAS 123R effective as of the beginning of
its first quarter in 2006. SFAS 123R provides alternative methods of adoption
which include prospective application and a modified retroactive application.
The Company is evaluating the available alternatives of adoption of SFAS 123R.
The Company believes the adoption of SFAS 123R will have a financial statement
impact which could be significant.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) 109-1,
&#147;Application of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, to the
Tax Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004.&#148; FSP 109-1 states that qualified domestic production
activities should be accounted for as a special deduction under SFAS 109,
&#147;Accounting for Income Taxes,&#148; and not be treated as a rate reduction.
Accordingly, any benefit from the deduction should be reported in the period in
which the deduction is claimed on the tax return. The Company is currently
evaluating the effect that the deduction will have, if any, in subsequent years.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
In December 2004, the FASB also issued FSP 109-2, &#147;Accounting and
Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision within the
American Jobs Creation Act of 2004.&#148; FSP 109-2 provides guidance under SFAS
109 with respect to recording the potential impact of the repatriation
provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (&#147;Jobs Act&#148;). FSP
109-2 temporarily allows companies that are evaluating whether to repatriate
foreign earnings under the Jobs Act to delay recognizing any related taxes until
that decision is made. This pronouncement also requires companies that are
considering repatriating earnings to disclose the status of their evaluation and
the potential amounts being considered for repatriation. The Company has
completed its evaluation of this legislation and FSP 109-2 and will not
repatriate any foreign earnings.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%><B>2.</B></TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%><B>BUSINESS COMBINATIONS AND GOODWILL</B></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
Effective January&#160;1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS&#160;142 which
established new accounting and reporting requirements for goodwill and other
intangible assets. SFAS 142 requires that goodwill amortization be discontinued
and replaced with periodic tests of impairment. With the adoption of SFAS 142,
management determined that the carrying value of the Company was impaired in an
amount greater than the carrying value of goodwill at the date of adoption. As
required by SFAS 142, the entire carrying value of goodwill was written off.
This write-off, $68&#160;million ($51&#160;million or $1.50 per share, net of
tax), was reported as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle,
on a net of tax basis, in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Operations for
the year ended December 31, 2002. The adoption of SFAS 142 had no cash flow
impact on the Company.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
During the second quarter of 2003, the Company purchased the minority ownership
of its Netherlands subsidiary pursuant to the terms of the original purchase
agreement for approximately $2.6 million. All of the purchase price was
attributable to goodwill and, as a result of an impairment analysis, was written
off in accordance with SFAS 142.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%><B>3.</B></TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%><B>PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT</B></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
Property, plant and equipment, net consists of the following (in thousands):
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<PRE>
                                                                                    <B>2004</B>      2003
                                                                                    ----      ----
     Land and buildings                                                          <B>$48,580</B>   $46,898
     Furniture and  fixtures, office, computer and other equipment and software   <B>71,653</B>    78,327
     Leasehold improvements                                                       <B>11,187</B>    14,010
                                                                                  ------    ------
                                                                                 <B>131,420</B>   139,235
     Less accumulated depreciation and amortization                               <B>65,857</B>    70,588
                                                                                  ------    ------
     Property, plant and equipment, net                                          <B>$65,563</B>   $68,647
                                                                                 =======   =======
</PRE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%><B>4.</B></TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%><B>RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS</B></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
The Company leased one warehouse and office facility from affiliates during the
year ended December 31, 2004 (see Note 10) and vacated a second warehouse and
office facility leased from affiliates during 2002. Rent expense under those
leases aggregated approximately $612,000 (2004), $612,000 (2003) and $1,071,000
(2002).
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%><B>5.</B></TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%><B>CREDIT FACILITIES</B></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
The Company maintains a $70,000,000 revolving credit agreement with a group of
financial institutions which provides for borrowings in the United States. The
borrowings are secured by all of the domestic accounts receivable and
inventories of the Company and the Company&#146;s shares of stock in its
domestic subsidiaries. The credit facility expires and outstanding borrowings
thereunder are due on September 30, 2006. The borrowings under the agreement are
subject to borrowing base limitations of up to 75% of eligible accounts
receivable and up to 25% of qualified inventories. The interest on outstanding
advances is payable monthly, at the Company&#146;s option, at the agent
bank&#146;s base rate (5.25% at December 31, 2004) plus 0.25% to 0.75% or the
bank's daily LIBOR rate (4.15% at December 31, 2004) plus 2.25% to 3%. The
facility also calls for a commitment fee payable quarterly in arrears of 0.5% of
the average daily unused portion of the facility. The revolving credit agreement
contains certain financial and other covenants, including restrictions on
capital expenditures and payments of dividends. The Company was in compliance
with all of the covenants as of December 31, 2004. As of December 31, 2004,
availability under the agreement was $54.6 million and there were outstanding
letters of credit of $9.1 million. As of December 31, 2003, availability under
the agreement was $49.0 million and there were outstanding letters of credit of
$8.0 million. There were no outstanding advances as of December 31, 2004 and
December 31, 2003.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
The Company also has a &#163;15,000,000 ($28,484,000 at the December 31, 2004
exchange rate) multi-currency credit facility with a United Kingdom financial
institution, which is available to its United Kingdom subsidiaries. Drawings
under the facility may be made by overdraft, trade acceptance or loan. The
facility does not have a termination date, but may be canceled with six months
notice. Borrowings under the facility are secured by certain assets of the
Company&#146;s United Kingdom subsidiaries and a portion of the line is subject
to a borrowing base limitation of 70% of eligible accounts receivable. At
December 31, 2004 there were &#163;5.3 million ($10.0 million) of borrowings
outstanding under this line with interest payable at a rate of 5.87%. At
December 31, 2003 there were &#163;7.5 million ($13.3 million at the December
31, 2003 exchange rate) of borrowings outstanding under this line with interest
payable at a rate of 5.85%.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
The Company&#146;s Netherlands subsidiary maintains a &#128;5 million ($6.7
million at the December 31, 2004 exchange rate) credit facility with a local
financial institution. Borrowings under the facility are secured by the
subsidiary&#146;s accounts receivable and are subject to a borrowing base
limitation of 85% of the eligible accounts. At December 31, 2004 there were
&#128;3.5 million ($4.8 million) of borrowings outstanding under this line with
interest payable at a rate of 5.0%. At December 31, 2003 there were &#128;4.5
million ($5.7 million at the December 31, 2003 exchange rate) of borrowings
outstanding under this line with interest payable at a rate of 5.0%. The
facility expires in November 2005.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
The weighted average interest rate on short-term borrowings was 6.0% in 2004,
5.2% in 2003 and 6.3% in 2002.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%><B>6.</B></TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%><B>LONG-TERM DEBT</B></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
Long-term debt consists of (in thousands):
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<PRE>
                                                                <B>2004</B>          2003
                                                                ----          ----
     Mortgage note payable (a)                               <B>$ 8,012</B>       $ 8,170
     Term loan payable (b)                                     <B>9,713</B>        10,338
     Capitalized equipment lease obligations                   <B>1,185</B>         1,591
                                                               -----         -----
                                                              <B>18,910</B>        20,099
     Less: current portion                                     <B>1,811</B>         1,746
                                                               -----         -----
                                                             <B>$17,099</B>       $18,353
                                                             =======       =======
</PRE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>(a)</TD>
<TD WIDTH=90%>
Mortgage note payable. The Company has a ten year, $8.4 million mortgage loan on
its Georgia distribution facility. The mortgage has monthly principal and
interest payments of $62,000 through May 2012, with a final additional principal
payment of $6.4 million at maturity in May 2012. The mortgage bears interest at
7.04% and is collateralized by the underlying land and building.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=5%>(b)</TD>
<TD WIDTH=90%>
Term loan payable. The Company has a term loan agreement which was used to
finance the construction of its United Kingdom facility and which is secured by
the underlying land and building. The loan matures in August 2012 and is
repayable in quarterly installments of(pound)165,000 ($313,000) plus interest.
The outstanding borrowing bears interest at LIBOR plus 160 basis points (5.25%
at December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003). The term loan agreement also
contains certain financial and other covenants related to the Company's United
Kingdom subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2004, the Company was not in compliance
with the financial covenants. The Company has received the lender's agreement to
issue a waiver with respect to these covenants.<BR>
<BR>
In connection with this term loan, the Company also entered into an interest
rate collar agreement to reduce its exposure to market rate fluctuations. The
collar agreement covers a period of three years, matures in the same amounts and
over the same periods as the related debt and has a cap of 6.0% and a floor of
4.5%. This derivative has been designated as a cash flow hedge for accounting
purposes. As of December 31, 2004, the notional amount of the interest rate
collar was &#163;5,115,000 ($9,713,000). The collar was in a neutral position as
of December 31, 2004 and in a loss position of approximately $39,000 as of
December 31, 2003, and, accordingly, the aggregate fair value of the collar was
recorded as a liability. The changes in the fair value of this derivative for
the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 have been recognized in the
Consolidated Statement of Operations as this hedge was determined to be
ineffective. The Company considers the credit risk related to the interest rate
collar to be low because such instrument was entered into with a financial
institution having a high credit rating and is generally settled on a net
basis.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
The aggregate maturities of long-term debt outstanding at December 31, 2004 are
as follows (in thousands):
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<PRE><FONT SIZE=1>
                               2005         2006         2007         2008         2009     After 2009
                               ----         ----         ----         ----         ----     ----------
         Maturities          $1,811       $1,817       $1,747       $1,587       $1,482        $10,466
</FONT></PRE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%><B>7.</B></TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%><B>RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER CHARGES</B></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
The Company periodically assesses its operations to ensure that they are
efficient, aligned with market conditions and responsive to customer needs.
During the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, management approved and
implemented restructuring actions which included workforce reductions and
facility consolidations. The following table summarizes the amounts recognized
by the Company as restructuring and other charges for the periods presented (in
thousands):
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<PRE>
     Years ended December 31,                                 <B>2004</B>          2003          2002
     ------------------------                                 ----          ----          ----
     2004 United States Streamlining Plan                   <B>$3,743</B>
     2003 United States Warehouse Consolidation Plan           <B>642</B>          $713
     2002 United Kingdom Consolidation Plan                    <B>467</B>         2,173        $4,051
     Software development write-off                                                     13,243
     Litigation settlement on software development                        (1,272)
     Other severance and exit costs                          <B>2,504</B>           112             -
                                                             -----           ---        ------
     Total restructuring and other charges                  <B>$7,356</B>        $1,726       $17,294
                                                            ======        ======       =======
</PRE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%><I>2004 United States Streamlining Plan</I></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>

In the first quarter of 2004, the Company implemented a plan to streamline the
back office and warehousing operations in its United States computer businesses.
The Company recorded $3.7 million of costs related to this plan, including $3.2
million for severance and benefits for approximately 200 terminated employees
and $483,000 of non-cash costs for impairment of the carrying value of fixed
assets.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
The following table summarizes the components of the restructuring charges, the
cash payments, non-cash activities, and the remaining accrual as of December 31,
2004 (in thousands):
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<PRE>
                                          Severance and          Asset           Other
                                        Personnel Costs    Write-downs      Exit Costs        Total
                                        ---------------    -----------      ----------        -----
     Charged to expense in 2004                  $3,153           $483            $107       $3,743
     Amounts utilized                            (2,520)          (483)            (95)      (3,098)
                                                 ------           ----             ---       ------
     Accrued at December 31, 2004                  $633           $  -             $12         $645
                                                   ====           ====             ===         ====
</PRE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
<I>2003 United States Warehouse Consolidation Plan</I><BR>
In the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company implemented a plan to consolidate the
warehousing facilities in its United States computer supplies business. In 2004
the Company recorded $642,000 of additional exit costs related to this plan. The
table below displays the activity and liability balance of the reserve for this
initiative (in thousands):
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<PRE>
                                          Severance and          Other
                                        Personnel Costs     Exit Costs        Total
                                        ---------------     ----------        -----
     Accrued at December 31, 2003                  $ 63           $650         $713
     Charged to expense in 2004                                    642          642
     Amounts utilized                               (63)          (659)        (722)
                                                    ---           ----         ----
     Accrued at December 31, 2004                   $ -           $633         $633
                                                    ===           ====         ====
</PRE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
<I>2002 United Kingdom Consolidation Plan</I><BR>
In 2002 the Company implemented a restructuring plan to consolidate the
activities of three United Kingdom locations into a new facility constructed for
the Company. In the third quarter of 2004, the Company recorded additional costs
related to this plan. The table below displays the activity and liability
balance of the reserve for this initiative (in thousands):
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<PRE>
                                            Other Exit Costs
                                            ----------------
       Accrued at December 31, 2003                   $2,312
       Charged to expense in 2004                        467
       Amounts utilized                               (2,028)
                                                      ------
       Accrued at December 31, 2004                     $751
                                                        ====
</PRE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
<I>Other severance and exit costs</I><BR>
During 2004, the Company recorded $2.5 million of restructuring costs in Europe
in connection with facility exit costs and workforce reductions, including a
consolidation of United Kingdom sales offices in the first quarter of 2004,
resulting in the elimination of 50 jobs. These costs were comprised of $1.4
million of employee severance costs and $0.7 million of other exit costs,
primarily asset write-downs.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
During the second quarter of 2002 the Company recorded a non-recurring write-off
of $13.2 million resulting from its decision to discontinue the development of
internal-use computer software.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
In August 2003, the Company settled its litigation with a software developer and
reversed a previously recorded liability of $1.3 million which was no longer
needed (See Note 10).
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%><B>8.</B></TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%><B>SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY</B></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
As required by law, certain foreign subsidiaries must retain a percentage of
shareholders' capital in the respective company. Accordingly, a portion of
retained earnings is restricted and not available for distribution to
shareholders. Such amount at December 31, 2004 and 2003 was not material.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
<I><U>Stock Option Plans</U></I> - The Company has three fixed option plans
which reserve shares of common stock for issuance to key employees, directors,
consultants and advisors to the Company. The following is a description of these
plans:
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
<I><U>The 1995 Long-term Stock Incentive Plan</U></I> - This plan allows the
Company to issue qualified, non-qualified and deferred compensation stock
options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and restricted unit grants,
performance unit grants and other stock based awards authorized by the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Options issued under this plan
expire ten years after the options are granted and generally become exercisable
ratably on the third, fourth, and fifth anniversary of the grant date. A maximum
total number of 2.0 million shares may be granted under this plan of which a
maximum of 800,000 shares may be of restricted stock and restricted stock units.
No award shall be granted under this plan after December 31, 2005. A total of
1,590,474 options were outstanding under this plan as of December 31, 2004.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
<I><U>The 1995 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors</U></I> - This plan
provides for automatic awards of non-qualified options to directors of the
Company who are not employees of the Company or its affiliates. All options
granted under this plan will have a ten year term from grant date and are
immediately exercisable. A maximum of 100,000 shares may be granted for awards
under this plan. This plan will terminate the day following the tenth annual
shareholders meeting. A total of 52,000 options were outstanding under this plan
as of December 31, 2004.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
<I><U>The 1999 Long-term Stock Incentive Plan, as amended("1999 Plan")</U></I> -
This plan was adopted on October 25, 1999 with substantially the same terms and
provisions as the 1995 Long-term Stock Incentive Plan. A maximum of 5.0 million
shares may be granted under this plan. The maximum number of shares granted per
type of award to any individual may not exceed 1,500,000 in any calendar year
and 3,000,000 in total. No award shall be granted under this plan after December
31, 2009. Restricted stock grants and common stock awards reduce stock options
otherwise available for future grant. A total of 1,598,777 options were
outstanding under this plan as of December 31, 2004.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
The following table reflects the plan activity for the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002:
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<PRE>
                                                    For Shares        Option Prices
                                                    ----------        -------------
               Outstanding, January 1, 2002          1,675,491      $  1.95 to $39.06
               Granted                                 591,375      $  3.05 to $ 3.39
               Cancelled                              (175,551)     $  1.95 to $18.41
                                                      --------      -----------------
               Outstanding, December 31, 2002        2,091,315      $  1.95 to $39.06
               Granted                               1,072,700      $  1.76 to $ 3.36
               Exercised                              (184,341)     $  1.76 to $ 3.05
               Cancelled                              (158,372)     $  1.76 to $39.06
                                                      --------      -----------------
               Outstanding, December 31, 2003        2,821,302      $  1.76 to $18.41
               Granted                                 780,267      $  5.30 to $ 6.34
               Exercised                              (144,168)     $  1.76 to $ 3.05
               Cancelled                              (216,150)     $  1.76 to $18.41
                                                      --------      -----------------
               Outstanding, December 31, 2004        3,241,251      $  1.76 to $18.41
                                                     =========
</PRE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
The following table summarizes information for the three years ended December
31, 2004 concerning currently outstanding and exercisable options:
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<PRE><FONT SIZE=1>
                                                   <B>2004</B>                         2003                        2002
                                         ------------------------     ------------------------    ------------------------
                                                 <B>Weighted-Average</B>             Weighted Average            Weighted Average
                                         <B>Shares   Exercise Price</B>      Shares   Exercise Price     Shares   Exercise Price
                                         ------   --------------      ------   --------------     ------   --------------
     Outstanding at beginning of year. <B>2,821,302     $ 3.70</B>         2,091,315     $ 5.01        1,675,491     $ 6.05
     Granted..........................   <B>780,267     $ 5.38</B>         1,072,700     $ 1.80          591,375     $ 3.05
     Exercised........................  <B>(144,168)    $ 2.28</B>          (184,341)    $ 2.27
     Cancelled........................  <B>(216,150)    $ 6.82</B>          (158,372)    $ 9.68         (175,551)    $ 8.36
                                       ---------                     --------                    --------
     Outstanding at end of year....... <B>3,241,251     $ 3.96</B>         2,821,302     $ 3.70        2,091,315     $ 5.01
                                       =========                    =========                   =========

     Options exercisable at year end.. <B>1,756,517</B>                    1,483,287                   1,093,294
     Weighted average fair value per
        option granted during the year     <B>$1.61</B>                        $0.81                       $0.67
</FONT></PRE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
As of December 31, 2004:
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<PRE><FONT SIZE=1>
     Range of                             Weighted-Average  Weighted-Average               Weighted-Average
     Exercise                   Number        Remaining         Exercise         Number        Exercise
      Price                  Outstanding  Contractual Life        Price       Exercisable        Price
     --------                -----------  ----------------  ----------------  -----------  ----------------
     $  1.76 to $  5.00        1,934,184        7.44            $  2.14        1,159,633        $  2.37
     $  5.01 to $ 15.00        1,248,967        7.68            $  6.15          538,784        $  7.17
     $ 15.01 to $ 18.41           58,100        1.46            $ 17.63           58,100        $ 17.63
                               ---------                                       ---------
     $  1.76 to $ 18.41        3,241,251        7.42            $  3.96        1,756,517        $  4.35
                               =========                                       =========
</FONT></PRE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company granted 1,000,000
restricted stock units under the 1999 Plan to a key employee. A restricted stock
unit represents the right to receive a share of the Company&#146;s common stock.
The grant is conditioned upon shareholder approval at the next annual meeting
and satisfaction of certain performance conditions based on earnings before
interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization expense in fiscal 2004, which
have been met. The restricted stock units vest at the rate of 20% on May 31,
2005 and 10% per year on April 6, 2006 and each year thereafter. The restricted
stock units have none of the rights as other shares of common stock until common
stock is distributed, other than rights to cash dividends. Compensation expense
for restricted stock awards is recognized based on the intrinsic value method
defined by APB 25. The total market value of the shares granted has been
recorded as &#147;Unearned Restricted Stock Compensation&#148; and is reported
as a separate component in the consolidated statements of shareholders&#146;
equity and is being expensed over the vesting period.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%><B>9.</B></TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%><B>INCOME TAXES</B></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
The components of income (loss) before income taxes are as follows (in
thousands):
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<PRE>
     Years Ended December 31                    <B>2004</B>          2003          2002
     -----------------------                    ----          ----          ----
     United States                           <B>$37,275</B>       $18,359       $(6,731)
     Foreign                                 <B>(16,802)</B>      (10,661)       (2,276)
                                             -------       -------       -------
     Total                                   <B>$20,473</B>        $7,698       $(9,007)
                                             =======       =======       =======
</PRE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
The provision (benefit) for income taxes consists of the following (in
thousands):
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<PRE>
     Years Ended December 31                    <B>2004</B>          2003          2002
     -----------------------                    ----          ----          ----
     Current:
          Federal                             <B>$9,793</B>        $5,247       $(3,037)
          State                                  <B>571</B>           709           758
          Foreign                              <B> (442)</B>        1,214         4,715
                                               -----         -----         -----
          Total current                        <B>9,922</B>         7,170         2,436
                                              ------         -----         -----
     Deferred:
          Federal                                <B>868</B>         1,932        (3,800)
          State                                 <B>(639)</B>         (864)         (604)
          Foreign                             <B>(2,228)</B>       (3,886)          929
                                              ------        ------           ---
          Total deferred                      <B>(1,999)</B>       (2,818)       (3,475)
                                              ------        ------        ------

     TOTAL                                    <B>$7,923</B>        $4,352       $(1,039)
                                              ======        ======       =======
</PRE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
Income taxes are accrued and paid by each foreign entity in accordance with
applicable local regulations.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
A reconciliation of the difference between the income tax expense (benefit) and
the computed income tax expense based on the Federal statutory corporate rate is
as follows (in thousands):
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<PRE>
     Years Ended December 31                               <B>2004</B>        2003        2002
     -----------------------                               ----        ----        ----
     Income tax (benefit) at Federal statutory rate      <B>$7,165</B>      $2,694     $(3,152)
     State and local income taxes (benefits), net of
         federal tax benefit                                <B>(67)</B>       (100)        100
     Foreign taxes in excess of U.S. rate and foreign
         losses with no benefit recognized, net           <B>2,392</B>         384       2,620
     Non-deductible goodwill impairment                                 900
     Tax credits                                           <B>(599)</B>       (660)       (906)
     Adjustment for prior year taxes                       <B>(588)</B>      1,311
     Other items, net                                      <B>(380)</B>       (177)        299
                                                           ----        ----         ---
                                                         <B>$7,923</B>      $4,352     $(1,039)
                                                         ======      ======     =======
</PRE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
The deferred tax assets (liabilities) are comprised of the following (in
thousands):
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<PRE>
                                                                 <B>2004</B>           2003
                                                                 ----           ----
     Current:
           Deductible assets                                    <B>$(699)</B>         $(640)
           Accrued expenses and other liabilities               <B>9,143</B>         11,069
           Non-deductible assets                                <B>1,125</B>            837
           Other                                                 <B>(358)</B>          (436)
           Valuation allowances                                  <B>(399)</B>          (698)
                                                                 ----           ----
               Total current                                    <B>8,812</B>         10,132
                                                                -----         ------

     Non-current:
           Net operating loss and credit carryforwards         <B>17,176</B>         18,170
           Foreign currency translation adjustments            <B>(2,816)</B>        (1,635)
           Accelerated depreciation                             <B>1,622</B>         (1,539)
           Intangible and other assets                         <B>12,042</B>         13,630
           Other                                                  <B>766</B>
           Valuation allowances                               <B>(10,522)</B>       (12,953)
                                                              -------        -------
               Total non-current                               <B>18,268</B>         15,673
                                                               ------         ------

     TOTAL                                                    <B>$27,080</B>        $25,805
                                                              =======        =======
</PRE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
The Company has not provided for federal income taxes applicable to the
undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries of $11.1 million as of
December 31, 2004, since these earnings are indefinitely reinvested. The Company
has foreign net operating loss carryforwards which expire from 2005 through 2019
except for carryforwards in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, which have
no expiration. In accordance with SFAS 109 &#147;Accounting for Income
Taxes&#148;, the Company records these benefits as assets to the extent that
utilization of such assets is more likely than not; otherwise, a valuation
allowance has been recorded. The Company has also provided valuation allowances
for certain state net operating loss carryforwards where it is not likely they
will be realized. During the year ended December 31, 2004 valuation allowances
increased $1,240,000 as a result of additional losses incurred and decreased
$3,970,000 for carryforward losses and tax credits utilized for which valuation
allowances had been previously provided.</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
The Company&#146;s federal income tax returns for fiscal years 2000 through 2002
are currently being audited by the Internal Revenue Service. Although proposed
adjustments have not been received for these years and the outcome of tax audits
is always uncertain, management believes the ultimate outcome of the audit will
not have a material adverse impact on the Company&#146;s consolidated financial
statements.</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%><B>10.</B></TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%><B>COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND OTHER MATTERS</B></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
<I><U>Leases</U></I> - The Company is obligated under operating lease agreements
for the rental of certain office and warehouse facilities and equipment which
expire at various dates through February 2014. The Company currently leases one
facility in New York from an entity owned by the Company&#146;s three principal
shareholders and senior executive officers (see Note 4).</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
At December 31, 2004, the future minimum annual lease payments for related and
third-party leases were as follows (in thousands):
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<PRE>
                                                            Third Party   Related Party
                                              Capitalized    Operating      Operating
                                                 Leases        Leases         Lease      Total
                                                 ------        ------         -----      -----
     2005                                          $403        $8,170          $612     $9,185
     2006                                           388         7,597           612      8,597
     2007                                           299         6,960           612      7,871
     2008                                           125         5,691                    5,816
     2009                                                       5,326                    5,326
     2010-2014                                                  6,924                    6,924
                                                 ------         -----         -----      -----

     Total minimum lease payments                 1,215        40,668        $1,836     43,719
     Less: sublease rental income                               1,741        ======      1,741
                                                               ------                   ------
     Lease obligation net of subleases                        $38,927                  $41,978
                                                              =======                  =======
     Less amount representing interest               30
                                                 ------
     Present value of minimum capitalized
     lease payments (including current
     portion of $387)                            $1,185
                                                 ======
</PRE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
Assets recorded under capital leases are included in Property, Plant and
Equipment as follows (in thousands):
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<PRE>
                                                              December 31,
                                                              ------------
                                                            <B>2004</B>        2003
                                                            ----        ----
        Furniture and fixtures,  office, computer
            and other equipment                           <B>$1,680</B>      $1,680
        Accumulated amortization                             <B>503</B>         123
                                                           -----       -----
                                                          <B>$1,177</B>      $1,557
                                                          ======      ======
</PRE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
Annual rent expense aggregated approximately $7,887,000, including $612,000 to
related parties, for 2004, $7,693,000, including $612,000 to related parties,
for 2003 and $8,164,000, including $1,071,000 to related parties, for
2002.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
<I><U>Litigation</U></I> - In August 2003 the Company entered into a settlement
agreement with a software developer of a new customer order management software
system that was being written for the Company&#146;s internal use. The specific
terms of the settlement agreement are confidential; however, none of the terms
had a material effect on the business or the consolidated financial statements
of the Company.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
The Company has also been named as a defendant in other lawsuits in the normal
course of its business, including those involving commercial, tax, employment
and intellectual property related claims. Based on discussions with legal
counsel, management believes the ultimate resolution of these lawsuits will not
have a material effect on the Company&#146;s consolidated financial statements.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
<I><U>Contingency</U></I> - The Company is required to collect sales tax on
certain of its sales. In accordance with current laws, approximately 17% of the
Company&#146;s 2004 domestic sales and 16% of the 2003 and 2002 domestic sales
were subject to sales tax. Changes in law could require the Company to collect
sales tax in additional states and subject the Company to liabilities related to
past sales.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
<I><U>Employee Benefit Plans</U></I> - The Company&#146;s U.S. subsidiaries
participate in a defined contribution 401(k) plan covering substantially all
U.S. employees. Employees may invest 1% or more of their eligible compensation,
limited to maximum amounts as determined by the Internal Revenue Service. The
Company provides a matching contribution to the plan, determined as a percentage
of the employees&#146; contributions. Aggregate expense to the Company for
contributions to such plans was approximately $436,000 in 2004, $408,000 in 2003
and $442,000 in 2002.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
Liabilities accrued by certain foreign entities for employee termination
indemnities, determined in accordance with labor laws and labor agreements in
effect in the respective country, were not material.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
<I><U>Foreign Exchange Risk Management</U></I> - The Company has no involvement
with derivative financial instruments and does not use them for trading
purposes. The Company may enter into foreign currency options or forward
exchange contracts to hedge certain foreign currency transactions. The intent of
this practice would be to minimize the impact of foreign exchange rate movements
on the Company&#146;s operating results. As of December 31, 2004, the Company
had no outstanding forward exchange contracts.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
<I><U>Fair Value of Financial Instruments</U></I> - Financial instruments
consist primarily of investments in cash and cash equivalents, trade account
receivables, accounts payable and debt obligations. The Company estimates the
fair value of financial instruments based on interest rates available to the
Company and by comparison to quoted market prices. At December 31, 2004 and
2003, the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable,
income taxes receivable and accounts payable are considered to be representative
of their respective fair values due to their short-term nature. The carrying
amounts of the notes payable to banks and the term loan payable are considered
to be representative of their respective fair values as their interest rates are
based on market rates. The estimated fair value of the Company&#146;s mortgage
loan payable was $9.0 million at December 31, 2004 and $8.8 million at December
31, 2003.</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
<I><U>Concentration of Credit Risk</U></I> - Financial instruments that
potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist of
cash, cash equivalents and accounts receivable. Concentrations of credit risk
with respect to accounts receivable are limited due to the large number of
customers and their geographic dispersion comprising the Company&#146;s customer
base.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%><B>11.</B></TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%><B>SEGMENT AND RELATED INFORMATION</B></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
Pursuant to SFAS 131 &#147;Disclosure About Segments of an Enterprise and
Related Information&#148;, the Company determined that it is engaged in a single
reportable segment which markets and sells various business products. The
Company&#146;s product offerings include personal computers (PCs), computer
related products, industrial products and office products and are monitored for
sales trends and profitability in these sub-categories. Products are marketed
through an integrated system of direct mail catalogs, a network of major account
sales representatives and proprietary e-commerce Internet web-sites.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
Financial information relating to the Company's operations by geographic area
was as follows (in thousands):
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<PRE>
                                                    Net Sales
                                   ----------------------------------------------
                                          <B>2004</B>         2003           2002
                                          ----         ----           ----

     North America                 <B>$ 1,231,586</B>   $ 1,026,233   $   963,805
     Europe                            <B>696,249</B>       631,545       587,712
                                       -------       -------       -------
     Consolidated                  <B>$ 1,927,835</B>   $ 1,657,778   $ 1,551,517
                                   ===========   ===========   ===========
          Revenues are attributed to countries based on location of selling subsidiary.

                                          Long-Lived Assets
                                          -----------------
                                          <B>2004</B>         2003
                                          ----         ----
     North America                    <B>$ 34,654</B>     $ 36,571
     Europe                             <B>30,909</B>       32,076
                                        ------       ------
     Consolidated                     <B>$ 65,563</B>     $ 68,647
                                      ========     ========
</PRE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%><B>12.</B></TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%><B>QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)</B></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
Subsequent to the issuance of the Company&#146;s financial statements in its
Forms 10-Q for the periods ended March 31, 2004, June 30, 2004 and September 30,
2004, the Company discovered errors related to accounting for inventory at a
subsidiary company. These errors, which related to inventories, were the result
of recording errors, which had the effect of overstating inventories and income
for the three months and year to date periods ended March 31, 2004, June 30,
2004 and September 30, 2004.
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
As a result, the condensed consolidated financial statements for the periods
ended March 31, 2004, June 30, 2004 and September 30, 2004 have been restated
from the amounts previously reported to properly reflect these items. A summary
of the effects of the restatement is as follows (in thousands, except per share
data):
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<PRE><FONT SIZE=1>
Three months ended:                March 31, 2004                   June 30, 2004                  September 30, 2004
                                   --------------                   -------------                  ------------------
                            As Previously                    As Previously                    As Previously
                              Reported       As Restated       Reported       As Restated       Reported       As Restated
                              --------       -----------       --------       -----------       --------       -----------
Cost of sales                 $410,916         $411,597        $363,172         $363,854        $387,047         $387,786
Gross profit                   $74,820          $74,139         $67,818          $67,136         $73,224          $72,485
Income from operations          $5,203           $4,522          $2,744           $2,062          $5,782           $5,043
Income before income taxes      $4,556           $3,875          $2,318           $1,636          $5,067           $4,328
Provision for income taxes      $2,144           $1,940          $1,647           $1,441          $2,375           $2,155
Net income                      $2,412           $1,935            $671             $195          $2,692           $2,173

Net income per common share:
Basic                             $.07             $.06            $.02             $.01            $.08             $.06
Diluted                           $.07             $.05            $.02             $.01            $.08             $.06
</FONT></PRE>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>&nbsp;</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>
Quarterly financial data is as follows (in thousands, except for per share
amounts):
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<PRE><FONT SIZE=1>
                                             First Quarter     Second Quarter    Third Quarter  Fourth Quarter
<B>     2004:                                      (As restated)     (As restated)  (As restated)
     Net Sales                                       $485,736          $430,990       $460,271         $550,838
     Gross profit                                     $74,139           $67,136        $72,485          $76,623
     Net income                                        $1,935              $195         $2,173           $8,247
     Net income per common share:
           Basic                                         $.06              $.01           $.06             $.24
           Diluted                                       $.05              $.01           $.06             $.23</B>

     2003:
     Net Sales                                       $426,461          $388,798       $405,011         $437,508
     Gross profit                                     $71,851           $62,919        $66,064          $64,199
     Net income (loss)                                 $4,597           $(2,288)        $1,174            $(137)
     Net income (loss) per common share:
           Basic                                         $.13             $(.07)          $.03             $.--
           Diluted                                       $.13             $(.07)          $.03             $.--
</FONT></PRE>

<P ALIGN=CENTER><FONT SIZE=3><B>EXHIBIT INDEX</B></FONT></P>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%></TD>
<TD WIDTH=15%><B>Exhibit<BR>
<U>No.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</U></B></TD>
<TD WIDTH=80%><B><U>Description</U></B></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%></TD>
<TD WIDTH=15%>21</TD>
<TD WIDTH=80%>Subsidiaries of the Registrant</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%></TD>
<TD WIDTH=15%>23</TD>
<TD WIDTH=80%>Consent of experts and counsel: Consent of Independent Public Accountants</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%></TD>
<TD WIDTH=15%>31.1</TD>
<TD WIDTH=80%>Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%></TD>
<TD WIDTH=15%>31.2</TD>
<TD WIDTH=80%>Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%></TD>
<TD WIDTH=15%>32.1</TD>
<TD WIDTH=80%>Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%></TD>
<TD WIDTH=15%>32.2</TD>
<TD WIDTH=80%>Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>


</BODY>
</HTML>
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-21
<SEQUENCE>2
<FILENAME>systemax-exh21_041405.htm
<TEXT>
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Exhibit 21</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<P ALIGN=RIGHT><FONT SIZE=3>Exhibit 21</FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=CENTER><FONT SIZE=3>SUBSIDIARIES OF SYSTEMAX INC.</FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3>DOMESTIC SUBSIDIARIES</FONT></P>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>1.<BR>
2.<BR>
3.<BR>
4.<BR>
5.<BR>
6.<BR>
7.<BR>
8.<BR>
9.</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>Global Computer Supplies Inc. (a New York corporation)<BR>
Global Equipment Company Inc. (a New York corporation)<BR>
Dartek Corporation (a Delaware corporation)<BR>
Nexel Industries Inc. (a New York corporation)<BR>
Tiger Direct Inc. (a Florida corporation)<BR>
Systemax Manufacturing Inc. (a Delaware corporation)<BR>
SYX Distribution Inc. (a Delaware corporation)<BR>
Systemax Services Inc. (a New York corporation)</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3>FOREIGN SUBSIDIARIES</FONT></P>

<TABLE WIDTH=100% CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0>
<TR VALIGN=TOP>
<TD WIDTH=5%>1.<BR>
2.<BR>
3.<BR>
4.<BR>
5.<BR>
6.<BR>
7.</TD>
<TD WIDTH=95%>Misco Germany Inc. (a New York corporation)<BR>
Misco Italy Computer Supplies S.P.A. (an Italian corporation)<BR>
H C S Global SA (a French corporation)<BR>
Systemax Europe Ltd. (a U.K. corporation)<BR>
Global Computer Products BV (a Dutch corporation)<BR>
Dabus Dataproducktor AB (a Swedish corporation)<BR>
Misco Iberia Computer Supplies S.A. (a Spanish corporation)</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<BR>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3><I>Note: the list excludes subsidiaries which, if
considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a
significant subsidiary as defined in Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X as of
December 31, 2004.</I></FONT></P>


</BODY>
</HTML>
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-23
<SEQUENCE>3
<FILENAME>systemax-exh23_041405.htm
<TEXT>
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Exhibit 23</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<P ALIGN=RIGHT><FONT SIZE=3>Exhibit 23</FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=CENTER><FONT SIZE=3>CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM</FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3>We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-21489, 333-21491, and 333-111618 of Systemax Inc. on Form S-8 of our
report dated April 13, 2005 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and
includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company's change in method
of accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets in 2002 to conform to
Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 142 "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets"), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Systemax
Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004.</FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3>/s/ Deloitte &amp; Touche LLP</FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=LEFT><FONT SIZE=3>New York, NY<BR>
April 13, 2005</FONT></P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-31
<SEQUENCE>4
<FILENAME>systemax-exh311_041405.htm
<DESCRIPTION>EXHIBIT 31.1
<TEXT>
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Exhibit 31.1</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<P ALIGN=RIGHT><FONT SIZE=3>Exhibit 31.1</FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=CENTER><FONT SIZE=3><B>CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE<BR>
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B><I>CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER</I></B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>I, Richard Leeds, Chief Executive Officer of Systemax Inc.,
certify that:</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Systemax
Inc. (the &#147;registrant&#148;);</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report;</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>4. The registrant&#146;s other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and (except as disclosed in Item 9A of this annual report on Form 10-K) we
have:</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
reasonably ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
these entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
being prepared;</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant&#146;s
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant&#146;s
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant&#146;s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant&#146;s control over
financial reporting.</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>5. The registrant&#146;s other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant&#146;s auditors and the audit committee
of the registrant&#146;s board of directors:</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting known to me
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant&#146;s ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant&#146;s internal
controls over financial reporting.</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>Date: April 15, 2005</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><U>/s/ RICHARD LEEDS</U><BR>
Richard Leeds, Chief Executive Officer</FONT></P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-31
<SEQUENCE>5
<FILENAME>systemax-exh312_041405.htm
<DESCRIPTION>EXHIBIT 31.2
<TEXT>
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Exhibit 31.2</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<P ALIGN=RIGHT><FONT SIZE=3>Exhibit 31.2</FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=CENTER><FONT SIZE=3><B>CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE<BR>
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><B><I>CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER</I></B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>I, Steven M. Goldschein, Chief Financial Officer of Systemax
Inc., certify that:</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Systemax
Inc. (the &#147;registrant&#148;);</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report;</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>4. The registrant&#146;s other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and (except as disclosed in Item 9A of this annual report on Form 10-K) we
have:</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
reasonably ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
these entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
being prepared;</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant&#146;s
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant&#146;s
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant&#146;s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant&#146;s control over
financial reporting.</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>5. The registrant&#146;s other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant&#146;s auditors and the audit committee
of the registrant&#146;s board of directors:</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting known to me
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant&#146;s ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant&#146;s internal
controls over financial reporting.</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>Date: April 15, 2005</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3><U>/s/ STEVEN M. GOLDSCHEIN</U><BR>
Steven M. Goldschein, Chief Financial Officer</FONT></P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-32
<SEQUENCE>6
<FILENAME>systemax-exh321_041405.htm
<DESCRIPTION>EXHIBIT 32.1
<TEXT>
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Exhibit 32.1</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<P ALIGN=RIGHT><FONT SIZE=3>Exhibit 32.1</FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=CENTER><FONT SIZE=3><B>CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE<BR>
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Systemax Inc.,
hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge, Systemax Inc.&#145;s Form
10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78m or 78 (o)(d)) and that the information contained in such Form 10-K
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Systemax Inc. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>Dated: April 15, 2005<BR>
<BR>
<U>/s/ RICHARD LEEDS</U><BR>
Richard Leeds, Chief Executive Officer</FONT></P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-32
<SEQUENCE>7
<FILENAME>systemax-exh322_041405.htm
<DESCRIPTION>EXHIBIT 32.2
<TEXT>
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Exhibit 32.2</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<P ALIGN=RIGHT><FONT SIZE=3>Exhibit 32.2</FONT></P>

<P ALIGN=CENTER><FONT SIZE=3><B>CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE<BR>
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002</B></FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Systemax Inc.,
hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge, Systemax Inc.&#145;s Form
10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78m or 78 (o)(d)) and that the information contained in such Form 10-K
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Systemax Inc. </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3>Dated: April 15, 2005<BR>
<BR>
<U>/s/ STEVEN M. GOLDSCHEIN</U><BR>
Steven M. Goldschein, Chief Financial Officer</FONT></P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
</SEC-DOCUMENT>
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----
