XML 26 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.1.900
Fair Value Measurement
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2015
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurement
Fair Value Measurement
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. A three level hierarchy has been established for valuing assets and liabilities based on how transparent (observable) the inputs are that are used to determine fair value, with the inputs considered most observable categorized as Level 1 and those that are the least observable categorized as Level 3. Hierarchy levels are defined as follows:
 
Level 1:
quoted (unadjusted) market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. For ProAssurance, Level 1 inputs are generally quotes for debt or equity securities actively traded in exchange or over-the-counter markets.
 
Level 2:
market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs). For ProAssurance, Level 2 inputs generally include quoted prices in markets that are not active, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, and results from pricing models that use observable inputs such as interest rates and yield curves that are generally available at commonly quoted intervals.
 
Level 3:
the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions based on the best information available in the circumstances (non-observable inputs). For ProAssurance, Level 3 inputs are used in situations where little or no Level 1 or 2 inputs are available or are inappropriate given the particular circumstances. Level 3 inputs include results from pricing models for which some or all of the inputs are not observable, discounted cash flow methodologies, single non-binding broker quotes and adjustments to externally quoted prices that are based on management judgment or estimation.
Fair values of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 are shown in the following tables. Where applicable, the tables also indicate the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized to determine those fair values. For some assets, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. When this is the case, the asset is categorized based on the level of the most significant input to the fair value measurement. Assessments of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement require judgment and consideration of factors specific to the assets being valued.
 
December 31, 2015
 
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
Total
(In thousands)
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Fair Value
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed maturities, available for sale
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury obligations
$

 
$
123,892

 
$

 
$
123,892

U.S. Government-sponsored enterprise obligations

 
26,334

 

 
26,334

State and municipal bonds

 
940,635

 

 
940,635

Corporate debt, multiple observable inputs
2,362

 
1,274,824

 

 
1,277,186

Corporate debt, limited observable inputs

 

 
14,500

 
14,500

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 
238,387

 

 
238,387

Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

 
10,999

 

 
10,999

Other commercial mortgage-backed securities

 
30,134

 

 
30,134

Other asset-backed securities

 
97,463

 
757

 
98,220

Equity securities
 
 
 
 
 
 

Financial
67,764

 

 

 
67,764

Utilities/Energy
41,050

 

 

 
41,050

Consumer oriented
56,470

 

 

 
56,470

Industrial
48,305

 

 

 
48,305

Bond funds
76,316

 

 

 
76,316

All other
18,239

 
14,209

 

 
32,448

Short-term investments
86,271

 
32,965

 

 
119,236

Other investments
3,478

 
27,133

 

 
30,611

Total assets categorized within the fair value hierarchy
$
400,255

 
$
2,816,975

 
$
15,257

 
3,232,487

LP/LLC interests carried at NAV which approximates fair value. These interests, reported as a part of Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries, are not categorized within the fair value hierarchy.
 
 
 
 
 
 
162,624

Total assets at fair value

 

 

 
$
3,395,111



 
December 31, 2014
 
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
Total
(In thousands)
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Fair Value
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed maturities, available for sale
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury obligations
$

 
$
166,512

 
$

 
$
166,512

U.S. Government-sponsored enterprise obligations

 
39,563

 

 
39,563

State and municipal bonds

 
1,057,590

 
5,025

 
1,062,615

Corporate debt, multiple observable inputs

 
1,404,020

 

 
1,404,020

Corporate debt, limited observable inputs

 

 
13,081

 
13,081

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 
276,056

 

 
276,056

Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

 
15,493

 

 
15,493

Other commercial mortgage-backed securities

 
51,063

 

 
51,063

Other asset-backed securities

 
111,855

 
4,769

 
116,624

Equity securities
 
 
 
 
 
 

Financial
79,341

 

 

 
79,341

Utilities/Energy
25,629

 

 

 
25,629

Consumer oriented
65,670

 

 

 
65,670

Industrial
55,460

 

 

 
55,460

Bond funds
55,196

 

 

 
55,196

All other
33,186

 

 

 
33,186

Short-term investments
131,199

 
60

 

 
131,259

Other investments
6,050

 
22,908

 

 
28,958

Total assets categorized within the fair value hierarchy
$
451,731

 
$
3,145,120

 
$
22,875

 
3,619,726

LP/LLC interests carried at NAV which approximates fair value. These interests, reported as a part of Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries, are not categorized within the fair value hierarchy.
 
 
 
 
 
 
133,250

Total assets at fair value

 

 

 
$
3,752,976


The fair values for securities included in the Level 2 category, with the few exceptions described below, were developed by one of several third party, nationally recognized pricing services, including services that price only certain types of securities. Each service uses complex methodologies to determine values for securities and subject the values they develop to quality control reviews. Management selected a primary source for each type of security in the portfolio and reviewed the values provided for reasonableness by comparing data to alternate pricing services and to available market and trade data. Values that appeared inconsistent were further reviewed for appropriateness. Any value that did not appear reasonable was discussed with the service that provided the value and would have been adjusted, if necessary. No such adjustments were necessary in 2015 or 2014.
Level 2 Valuations
Below is a summary description of the valuation methodologies primarily used by the pricing services for securities in the Level 2 category, by security type:
U.S. Treasury obligations were valued based on quoted prices for identical assets, or, in markets that are not active, quotes for similar assets, taking into consideration adjustments for variations in contractual cash flows and yields to maturity.
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprise obligations were valued using pricing models that consider current and historical market data, normal trading conventions, credit ratings, and the particular structure and characteristics of the security being valued, such as yield to maturity, redemption options, and contractual cash flows. Adjustments to model inputs or model results were included in the valuation process when necessary to reflect recent regulatory, government or corporate actions or significant economic, industry or geographic events affecting the security’s fair value.
State and municipal bonds were valued using a series of matrices that considered credit ratings, the structure of the security, the sector in which the security falls, yields, and contractual cash flows. Valuations were further adjusted, when necessary, to reflect the expected effect on fair value of recent significant economic or geographic events or ratings changes.
Corporate debt with multiple observable inputs consisted primarily of corporate bonds, but also included a small number of bank loans. The methodology used to value Level 2 corporate bonds was the same as the methodology previously described for U.S. Government-sponsored enterprise obligations. Bank loans were valued based on an average of broker quotes for the loans in question, if available. If quotes were not available, the loans were valued based on quoted prices for comparable loans or, if the loan was newly issued, by comparison to similar seasoned issues. Broker quotes were compared to actual trade prices on a regular basis to permit assessment of the reliability of the quotes; unreliable quotes were not considered in quoted averages.
Residential and commercial mortgage backed securities. Agency pass-through securities were valued using a pricing matrix which considers the issuer type, coupon rate and longest cash flows outstanding. The matrix used was based on the most recently available market information. Agency and non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations were both valued using models that consider the structure of the security, current and historical information regarding prepayment speeds, ratings and ratings updates, and current and historical interest rate and interest rate spread data.
Other asset-backed securities were valued using models that consider the structure of the security, monthly payment information, current and historical information regarding prepayment speeds, ratings and ratings updates, and current and historical interest rate and interest rate spread data. Spreads and prepayment speeds consider collateral type.
Equity securities were securities not traded on an exchange on the valuation date. The securities were valued using the most recently available quotes for the securities.
Short-term investments are securities maturing within one year, carried at cost which approximated the fair value of the security due to the short term to maturity.
 Other investments consisted primarily of convertible bonds valued using a pricing model that incorporated selected dealer quotes as well as current market data regarding equity prices and risk free rates. If dealer quotes were unavailable for the security being valued, quotes for securities with similar terms and credit status were used in the pricing model. Dealer quotes selected for use were those considered most accurate based on parameters such as underwriter status and historical reliability.
Level 3 Valuations
Below is a summary description of the valuation processes and methodologies used as well as quantitative information regarding securities in the Level 3 category.
Level 3 Valuation Processes
Level 3 securities are priced by the Chief Investment Officer.
Level 3 valuations are computed quarterly. Prices are evaluated quarterly against prior period prices and the expected change in price.
ProAssurance Level 3 securities are primarily NRSRO rated debt instruments for which comparable market inputs are commonly available for evaluating the securities in question. Valuation of these debt instruments is not overly sensitive to changes in the unobservable inputs used.

Level 3 Valuation Methodologies
State and municipal bonds consisted of auction rate municipal bonds valued internally using either published quotes for similar securities or values produced by discounted cash flow models using yields currently available on fixed rate securities with a similar term and collateral, adjusted to consider the effect of a floating rate and a premium for illiquidity.
Corporate debt with limited observable inputs consisted of corporate bonds valued using dealer quotes for similar securities or discounted cash flow models using yields currently available for similar securities. Similar securities are defined as securities of comparable credit quality that have like terms and payment features. Assessments of credit quality were based on NRSRO ratings, if available, or were subjectively determined by Management if not available. At December 31, 2015, 83% of the securities were rated; the average rating was A-. At December 31, 2014, 80% of the securities were rated; the average rating was A-.
Other asset-backed securities consisted of securitizations of receivables valued using dealer quotes for similar securities or discounted cash flow models using yields currently available for similar securities.
Quantitative Information Regarding Level 3 Valuations
 
 
Fair Value at
 
 
 
 
 
 
(In millions)
 
December 31, 2015
 
December 31, 2014
 
Valuation Technique
 
Unobservable Input
 
Range
(Weighted Average)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
State and municipal bonds
 
$—
 
$5.0
 
Market Comparable
Securities
 
Comparability Adjustment
 
0% - 10% (5%)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discounted Cash Flows
 
Comparability Adjustment
 
0% - 10% (5%)
Corporate debt with limited observable inputs
 
$14.5
 
$13.1
 
Market Comparable
Securities
 
Comparability Adjustment
 
0% - 5% (2.5%)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discounted Cash Flows
 
Comparability Adjustment
 
0% - 5% (2.5%)
Other asset-backed securities
 
$0.8
 
$4.8
 
Market Comparable
Securities
 
Comparability Adjustment
 
0% - 5% (2.5%)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discounted Cash Flows
 
Comparability Adjustment
 
0% - 5% (2.5%)

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the above listed securities were the valuations of comparable securities with similar issuers, credit quality and maturity. Changes in the availability of comparable securities could result in changes in the fair value measurements.
Fair Value Measurements - Level 3 Assets
The following tables (the Level 3 Tables) present summary information regarding changes in the fair value of assets measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs.
 
December 31, 2015
 
Level 3 Fair Value Measurements – Assets
(In thousands)
U.S. Government-sponsored Enterprise Obligations
 
State and Municipal Bonds
 
Corporate Debt
 
Asset-backed Securities
 
Equity Securities and Other Investments
 
Total
Balance December 31, 2014
$

 
$
5,025

 
$
13,081

 
$
4,769

 
$

 
$
22,875

Total gains (losses) realized and unrealized:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Included in earnings, as a part of:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net investment income

 

 
18

 

 

 
18

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries

 

 

 

 
(83
)
 
(83
)
Net realized investment gains (losses)

 

 
(363
)
 
(11
)
 
(156
)
 
(530
)
Included in other comprehensive income

 
(459
)
 
73

 
(7
)
 

 
(393
)
Purchases

 

 
1,996

 
1,500

 
1,700

 
5,196

Sales

 

 
(1,896
)
 
(4,000
)
 

 
(5,896
)
Transfers in

 

 
6,640

 

 

 
6,640

Transfers out

 
(4,566
)
 
(5,049
)
 
(1,494
)
 
(1,461
)
 
(12,570
)
Balance December 31, 2015
$

 
$

 
$
14,500

 
$
757

 
$

 
$
15,257

Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings for the above period for Level 3 assets held at period-end
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$


 
December 31, 2014
 
Level 3 Fair Value Measurements – Assets
(In thousands)
U.S. Government-sponsored Enterprise Obligations
 
State and Municipal Bonds
 
Corporate Debt
 
Asset-backed Securities
 
Equity Securities and Other Investments
 
Total
Balance December 31, 2013
$

 
$
7,338

 
$
14,176

 
$
6,814

 
$

 
$
28,328

Total gains (losses) realized and unrealized:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Included in earnings, as a part of:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net investment income

 
(14
)
 
65

 

 

 
51

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries

 

 

 

 

 

Net realized investment gains (losses)

 
(95
)
 
3

 

 

 
(92
)
Included in other comprehensive income
1

 
(29
)
 
688

 
59

 

 
719

Purchases
1,000

 
1,861

 
2,000

 
3,340

 

 
8,201

Sales

 
(1,731
)
 
(1,826
)
 
(61
)
 

 
(3,618
)
Transfers in

 
2,119

 

 
305

 

 
2,424

Transfers out
(1,001
)
 
(4,424
)
 
(2,025
)
 
(5,688
)
 

 
(13,138
)
Balance December 31, 2014
$

 
$
5,025

 
$
13,081

 
$
4,769

 
$

 
$
22,875

Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings for the above period for Level 3 assets held at period-end
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$



Transfers
There were no transfers between the Level 1 and Level 2 categories during 2015 or 2014.
Transfers shown in the preceding Level 3 tables were as of the end of the quarter in which the transfer occurred. All transfers were to or from Level 2.
All transfers during 2015 and 2014 related to securities held for which the level of market activity for identical or nearly identical securities varies from period to period. The securities were valued using multiple observable inputs when those inputs were available; otherwise the securities were valued using limited observable inputs.
Fair Values Not Categorized
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries at both December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 included interests in investment fund LPs/LLCs that measure fund assets at fair value on a recurring basis and that provide a NAV for the interest. The carrying value of these interests is based on the NAV provided, and was considered to approximate the fair value of the interests. In accordance with GAAP, the fair value of these investments was not classified within the fair value hierarchy. Additional information regarding these investments is as follows:
 
Unfunded
Commitments
 
Fair Value
(In thousands)
December 31,
2015
 
December 31,
2015
 
December 31,
2014
Investments in LPs/LLCs:
 
 
 
 
 
Private debt funds (1)
$14,267
 
$
50,268

 
$
37,296

Long equity fund (2)
None
 
6,407

 
6,747

Long/short equity funds (3)
None
 
28,030

 
25,301

Non-public equity funds (4)
$48,381
 
65,722

 
51,811

Multi-strategy fund of funds (5)
None
 
8,252

 
8,271

Structured credit fund (6)
None
 
3,945

 
3,824

 
 
 
$
162,624

 
$
133,250

(1)
Comprised of interests in two unrelated LP funds that are structured to provide interest distributions primarily through diversified portfolios of private debt instruments. One LP allows redemption by special consent; the other does not permit redemption. Income and capital are to be periodically distributed at the discretion of the LPs over an anticipated time frame that spans from 3 to 8 years.
(2)
The fund is an LP that holds long equities of public international companies. Redemptions are allowed at the end of any calendar month with a prior notice requirement of 15 days and are paid within 10 days of the end of the calendar month of the redemption request.
(3)
Comprised of interests in multiple unrelated LP funds. The funds hold primarily long and short North American equities, and target absolute returns using strategies designed to take advantage of event-driven market opportunities. The funds generally permit quarterly or semi-annual capital redemptions subject to notice requirements of 30 to 90 days. For some funds, redemptions above specified thresholds (lowest threshold is 90%) may be only partially payable until after a fund audit is completed and are then payable within 30 days.
(4)
Comprised of interests in three unrelated LP funds, each structured to provide capital appreciation through diversified investments in private equity, which can include investments in buyout, venture capital, mezzanine debt, distressed debt and other private equity-oriented LPs. One LP allows redemption by special consent; the others do not permit redemption. Income and capital are to be periodically distributed at the discretion of the LP over time frames that are anticipated to span up to 9 years.
(5)
This fund is an LLC structured to build and manage low volatility, multi-manager portfolios that have little or no correlation to the broader fixed income and equity security markets. Redemptions are not permitted but offers to repurchase units of the LLC may be extended periodically.
(6)
This fund is an LP seeking to obtain superior risk-adjusted absolute returns by acquiring and actively managing a diversified portfolio of debt securities, including bonds, loans and other asset-backed instruments. Redemptions are allowed at any quarter-end with a prior notice requirement of 90 days.
ProAssurance may not sell, transfer or assign its interest in any of the above LPs/LLCs without special consent from the LP/LLC.
Financial Instruments - Methodologies Other Than Fair Value
The following table provides the estimated fair value of our financial instruments that, in accordance with GAAP for the type of investment, are measured using a methodology other than fair value. All fair values provided fall within the Level 3 fair value category.
 
December 31, 2015
 
December 31, 2014
(In thousands)
Carrying
Value
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Value
 
Fair
Value
Financial assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BOLI
$
57,213

 
$
57,213

 
$
56,381

 
$
56,381

Other investments
48,522

 
51,646

 
57,099

 
57,994

Other assets
24,215

 
24,193

 
22,440

 
22,399

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Senior notes due 2023
$
250,000

 
$
261,308

 
$
250,000

 
$
276,503

Revolving credit agreement
100,000

 
100,000

 

 

Other liabilities
14,897

 
14,893

 
14,656

 
14,645


The fair value of the BOLI was equal to the cash surrender value associated with the policies on the valuation date.
Other investments listed in the table above include interests in certain investment fund LPs/LLCs accounted for using the cost method, investments in FHLB common stock carried at cost, and an annuity investment carried at amortized cost. The estimated fair value of the LP/LLC interests was based on the equity value of the interest provided by the LP/LLC managers for the most recent quarter, which approximates the fair value of the interest. The estimated fair value of the FHLB common stock was based on the amount ProAssurance would receive if its membership were canceled, as the membership cannot be sold. The fair value of the annuity represents the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted using a rate available in active markets for similarly structured instruments.
Other assets and Other liabilities primarily consisted of related investment assets and liabilities associated with funded deferred compensation agreements. Fair values of the funded deferred compensation assets and liabilities were based on the NAVs provided by the underlying funds. Other assets also included a secured note receivable and an unsecured receivable under a revolving credit agreement. Fair value of these receivables was based on the present value of expected cash flows from the receivables, discounted at market rates on the valuation date for receivables with similar credit standings and similar payment structures. Other liabilities also included contractual liabilities related to prior business combinations. The fair values of the business combination liabilities were based on the present value of the expected future cash outflows, discounted at ProAssurance’s assumed incremental borrowing rate on the valuation date for unsecured liabilities with similar repayment structures.
The fair value of the long-term debt was estimated based on the present value of expected future cash outflows, discounted at rates available on the valuation date for similar debt issued by entities with a similar credit standing to ProAssurance.