XML 59 R27.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.25.0.1
Risk Management and Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Notes)
 12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2024
Risk Management and Fair Value of Financial Instruments [Abstract]  
Risk Management and Fair Value of Financial Instruments RISK MANAGEMENT AND FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
RISK MANAGEMENT
The following is a description of the Company’s risk management policies.
Interest Rate Risk
The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates primarily through senior secured debt. At December 31, 2024, the Company's primary interest rate exposure was to interest rate fluctuations, specifically SOFR, due to its impact on our borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility.
As of December 31, 2024, the Company had variable interest rate debt from outstanding amounts under Revolving Credit Facility of $490 million, which was based on Term SOFR, excluding $140 million of securitization obligations.
Credit Risk and Exposure
The Company is exposed to counterparty credit risk in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to various agreements and sales transactions. The Company manages such risk by evaluating the financial position and creditworthiness of such counterparties and by requiring collateral in instances in which financing is provided. The Company mitigates counterparty credit risk associated with its derivative contracts by monitoring the amounts at risk with each counterparty to such contracts, periodically evaluating counterparty creditworthiness and financial position, and where possible, dispersing its risk among multiple counterparties.
As of December 31, 2024, there were no significant concentrations of credit risk with any individual counterparty or a group of counterparties. The Company actively monitors the credit risk associated with the Company’s receivables.
Market Risk Exposure
Owned Brokerage Group operates real estate brokerage offices located in and around large metropolitan areas in the U.S. Owned Brokerage Group has more offices and realizes more of its revenues in California, Florida and the New York metropolitan area than any other regions of the country. For the year ended December 31, 2024, Owned Brokerage Group generated approximately 23% of its revenues from California, 21% from the New York metropolitan area and 13% from Florida. For the year ended December 31, 2023, Owned Brokerage Group generated approximately 22% of its revenues from California, 21% from the New York metropolitan area and 14% from Florida. For the year ended December 31, 2022, Owned Brokerage Group generated approximately 23% of its revenues from California, 21% from the New York metropolitan area and 13% from Florida.
Fair Value Measurements
The following tables present the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and are categorized using the fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy has three levels based on the reliability of the inputs used to determine fair value.
Level Input:Input Definitions:
Level I
Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets at the measurement date.
Level II
Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level I that are observable for the asset or liability through corroboration with market data at the measurement date.
Level III
Unobservable inputs that reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date.
The availability of observable inputs can vary from asset to asset and is affected by a wide variety of factors including, for example, the type of asset, whether the asset is new and not yet established in the marketplace, and other characteristics particular to the transaction. To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised by the Company in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized in Level III. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.
The fair value of financial instruments is generally determined by reference to quoted market values. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques, as appropriate. The fair value of interest rate swaps is determined based upon a discounted cash flow approach.
The Company measures financial instruments at fair value on a recurring basis and recognizes transfers within the fair value hierarchy at the end of the fiscal quarter in which the change in circumstances that caused the transfer occurred.
The following table summarizes fair value measurements by level at December 31, 2024 for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Level ILevel IILevel IIITotal
Deferred compensation plan assets (included in other non-current assets)$1 $— $— $1 
Contingent consideration for acquisitions (included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities and other non-current liabilities)
— — 2 2 
The following table summarizes fair value measurements by level at December 31, 2023 for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Level ILevel IILevel IIITotal
Deferred compensation plan assets (included in other non-current assets)$1 $— $— $1 
Contingent consideration for acquisitions (included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities and other non-current liabilities)
— — 4 4 
The fair value of the Company’s contingent consideration for acquisitions is measured using a probability weighted-average discount rate to estimate future cash flows based upon the likelihood of achieving future operating results for individual acquisitions. These assumptions are deemed to be unobservable inputs and as such the Company’s contingent consideration is classified within Level III of the valuation hierarchy. The Company reassesses the fair value of the contingent consideration liabilities on a quarterly basis.
The following table presents changes in Level III financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Level III
Fair value of contingent consideration at December 31, 2023$4 
Additions: contingent consideration related to acquisitions completed during the period— 
Reductions: payments of contingent consideration
(2)
Changes in fair value (reflected in general and administrative expenses)— 
Fair value of contingent consideration at December 31, 2024$2 
The following table summarizes the principal amount of the Company’s indebtedness compared to the estimated fair value, primarily determined by quoted market values, at:
 December 31, 2024December 31, 2023
DebtPrincipal AmountEstimated
Fair Value (a)		Principal AmountEstimated
Fair Value (a)
Revolving Credit Facility$490 $490 $285 $285 
Term Loan A Facility
— — 206 205 
7.00% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes
640 564 640 590 
5.75% Senior Notes558 442 576 448 
5.25% Senior Notes449 337 457 336 
0.25% Exchangeable Senior Notes403 359 403 314 
_______________
(a)The fair value of the Company's indebtedness is categorized as Level II.