XML 48 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v2.4.0.6

INVESTMENTS | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Mar. 31, 2013
INVESTMENTS [Abstract] |
INVESTMENTS |
3. | INVESTMENTS
We record our investments at fair value as determined in good faith by our Board of Directors in accordance with GAAP. When available, we base the fair value of our investments on directly observable market prices or on market data derived for comparable assets. For all other investments, inputs used to measure fair value reflect management's best estimate of assumptions that would be used by market participants in pricing the investments in a hypothetical transaction. The levels of fair value inputs used to measure our investments are characterized in accordance with the fair value hierarchy established by ASC. We use judgment and consider factors specific to the investment in determining the significance of an input to a fair value measurement. While management believes our valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy and investments that fall into each of the levels are described below:
| · | Level 1: Investments whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. We use Level 1 inputs for publicly traded unrestricted securities. Such investments are valued at the closing price for listed securities and at the lower of the closing bid price or the closing sale price for NASDAQ securities on the valuation date.
| · | Level 2: Investments whose values are based on observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument in non-active markets, quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets and similar data. We did not value any of our investments using Level 2 inputs as of March 31, 2013 and 2012.
| · | Level 3: Investments whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. These inputs reflect management's own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the investment. We used Level 3 inputs for measuring the fair value of approximately 70.8% of our investments as of March 31, 2013. See "Notes to Consolidated Schedule of Investments" (c) on page 47 for the investment policy used to determine the fair value of these investments.
As required by ASC 820, when the inputs used to measure fair value fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the level within the fair value measurement is categorized based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement which may include inputs that are observable (Levels 1 and 2) and unobservable (Level 3). Therefore, gains and losses for such investments categorized within the Level 3 table below may include changes in fair value that are attributable to both observable inputs (Levels 1 and 2) and unobservable (Level 3). We conduct reviews of fair value hierarchy classifications on a quarterly basis. Changes in the observability of valuation inputs may result in a reclassification of certain investments. Unobservable inputs are those inputs for which little or no market data exists and, therefore, require an entity to develop its own assumptions. The fair value determination of each portfolio company requires one or more of the following unobservable inputs:
| · | Financial information obtained from each portfolio company, including audited and unaudited statements of operations and balance sheets for the most recent period available as compared to budgeted numbers;
| · | Current and projected financial condition of the portfolio company;
| · | Current and projected ability of the portfolio company to service its debt obligations;
| · | Projected operating results of the portfolio company;
| · | Current information regarding any offers to purchase the investment or recent private sales transactions;
| · | Current ability of the portfolio company to raise any additional financing as needed;
| · | Change in the economic environment which may have a material impact on the operating results of the portfolio company;
| · | Qualitative assessment of key management;
| · | Contractual rights, obligations or restrictions associated with the investment; and
| · | Other factors deemed relevant.
Preferred Stock and Common Stock The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of our equity securities are EBITDA multiples, revenue multiples, net book values, tangible book value multiples, and the weighted average costs of capital ("WACC"). Generally, increases or decreases in EBITDA or revenue multiple inputs result in a higher or lower fair value measurement, respectively. Generally, increases or decreases in WACC result in a lower or higher fair value measurement, respectively. However, due to the nature of certain investments, fair value measurements may be based on other criteria, such as third party-appraisals. For recent investments, we generally rely on our cost basis to determine the fair value unless fair value is deemed to have departed from this level. Debt Securities The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of our debt securities are risk adjusted discount factors used in the yield valuation technique and probability of principal recovery. Significant increase or decrease in any of these valuation inputs in isolation would result in a significantly lower or higher fair value measurement. However, due to the nature of certain investments, fair value measurements may be based on other criteria, such as third party inputs. Limited Partnership or Limited Liability Company Interests For recent investments, we generally evaluate limited partnership or limited liability company interests at cost, which is deemed to represent market value, unless or until there is substantive evidence that cost does not correspond to fair value. Thereafter, these securities are generally valued at our percentage interest of the fund or company's calculated net asset value, unless there is substantive evidence that the net asset value does not correspond to fair value. All investments of each fund are valued by each fund in accordance with ASC 820. Warrants We generally use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of warrants held in our portfolio. Option pricing models, including the Black-Scholes model, require the use of subjective inputs, including expected volatility, expected life, expected dividend rate, and expected risk-free rate of return. In the Black-Scholes model, variation in the expected volatility or expected term assumptions has a significant impact on fair value. The table below presents the valuation technique and quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs utilized by the Company to value our Level 3 investments as of March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012. Unobservable inputs are those inputs for which little or no market data exists and therefore require an entity to develop its own assumptions. The table is not intended to be all inclusive, but instead captures the significant unobservable inputs relevant to our determination of fair value.
Type | Valuation Technique |  | Fair Value at 3/31/2013 (in millions) |  | Unobservable Input |  | Range |  |  | Weighted Average |
Preferred & Common Equity | Market Approach |  | $ | 342.2 |  | EBITDA Multiple |  |  | 3.25x – 7.00x |  |  |  | 6.45 | x
| Market Approach |  | $ | 11.1 |  | Revenue Multiple |  |  | 0.25x – 1.82x |  |  |  | 0.97 | x
| Market Approach |  | $ | 7.9 |  | Cash and Asset Value |  | NA |  |  | NA |
| Discounted Cash Flow |  | $ | 0.7 |  | Discount Rate |  |  | 1.75 | % |  |  | 1.75 | %
| Market Approach |  | $ | 3.0 |  | Multiple of Tangible Book Value |  |  | 1.22 | x |  |  | 1.22 | x
| Market Approach |  | $ | 22.6 |  | Recent Transaction Price |  | NA |  |  | NA |
| Market Approach |  | $ | 0.2 |  | Market Value of Held Securities |  | NA |  |  | NA |
|  |  | $ | 387.7 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Debt | Discounted Cash Flow |  | $ | 3.1 |  | Discount Rate |  |  | 10.02% -12.00 | % |  |  | 10.77 | %
| Recent Transaction Price |  | $ | 3.5 |  | Recent Transaction Price |  | NA |  |  | NA |
|  |  | $ | 6.6 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Partnership Interests | Net Asset Value* |  | $ | 12.2 |  | Fund Value |  | NA |  |  | NA |
| Total |  | $ | 406.5 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Type | Valuation Technique |  | Fair Value at 3/31/2012 (in millions) |  | Unobservable Input |  | Range |  |  | Weighted Average |
Preferred & Common Equity | Market Approach |  | $ | 270.2 |  | EBITDA Multiple |  |  | 3.25x - 6.50x |  |  |  | 5.71 | x
| Market Approach |  | $ | 11.7 |  | Revenue Multiple |  |  | 1.10x – 1.97x |  |  |  | 1.48 | x
| Market Approach |  | $ | 5.5 |  | Cash and Asset Value |  | NA |  |  | NA |
| Discounted Cash Flow |  | $ | 0.8 |  | Discount Rate |  |  | 3.56 | % |  |  | 3.56 | %
| Market Approach |  | $ | 2.3 |  | Multiple of Tangible Book Value |  |  | 1.00 | x |  |  | 1.00 | x
| Market Approach |  | $ | 5.0 |  | Recent Transaction Price |  | NA |  |  | NA |
| Market Approach |  | $ | 0.1 |  | Market Value of Held Securities |  | NA |  |  | NA |
|  |  | $ | 295.6 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Debt | Discounted Cash Flow |  | $ | 8.0 |  | Discount Rate |  |  | 10.31%-16.22 | % |  |  | 14.74 | %
| Recent Transaction Price |  | $ | 3.2 |  | Recent Transaction Price |  | NA |  |  | NA |
|  |  | $ | 11.2 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Partnership Interests | Net Asset Value* |  | $ | 11.0 |  | Fund Value |  | NA |  |  | NA |
| Total |  | $ | 317.8 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
As of March 31, 2013 and 2012, 70.8% and 56.9%, respectively, of our portfolio investments were categorized as Level 3. The following fair value hierarchy tables set forth our investment portfolio by level as of March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012 (in millions):
|  |  |  |  | Fair Value Measurements at 3/31/13 Using |
Asset Category |  | Total |  |  | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |  |  | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |  |  | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
Debt |  | $ | 6.6 |  |  | $ | − |  |  | $ | − |  |  | $ | 6.6 |
Partnership Interests |  |  | 12.2 |  |  |  | − |  |  |  | − |  |  |  | 12.2 |
Preferred Equity |  |  | 44.6 |  |  |  | − |  |  |  | − |  |  |  | 44.6 |
Common Equity |  |  | 510.8 |  |  |  | 167.7 |  |  |  | − |  |  |  | 343.1 |
Total Investments |  | $ | 574.2 |  |  | $ | 167.7 |  |  | $ | − |  |  | $ | 406.5 |
|  |  |  |  | Fair Value Measurements at 3/31/12 Using |
Asset Category |  | Total |  |  | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |  |  | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |  |  | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
Debt |  | $ | 11.2 |  |  | $ | − |  |  | $ | − |  |  | $ | 11.2 |
Partnership Interests |  |  | 11.0 |  |  |  | − |  |  |  | − |  |  |  | 11.0 |
Preferred Equity |  |  | 33.9 |  |  |  | − |  |  |  | − |  |  |  | 33.9 |
Common Equity |  |  | 502.4 |  |  |  | 240.7 |  |  |  | − |  |  |  | 261.7 |
Total Investments |  | $ | 558.5 |  |  | $ | 240.7 |  |  | $ | − |  |  | $ | 317.8 |
Changes in Fair Value Levels We monitor the availability of observable market data to assess the appropriate classification of financial instruments within the fair value hierarchy. Changes in economic conditions or model based valuation techniques may require the transfer of financial instruments from one fair value to another. The following table provides a summary of changes in the fair value of investments measured using Level 3 inputs during the years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 (in millions):
|  | Fair Value 3/31/12 |  |  | Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |  |  | New Investments |  |  | Divestitures |  |  | Net Changes from Unrealized to Realized |  |  | Conversion of Security from Debt to Equity |  |  | Transfer out of Level 3 |  |  | Fair Value at 3/31/13 |
Debt |  | $ | 11.2 |  |  | $ | (5.4 | ) |  | $ | 4.0 |  |  | $ | − |  |  | $ | − |  |  | $ | (3.2 | ) |  | $ | − |  |  | $ | 6.6 |
Partnership Interest |  |  | 11.0 |  |  |  | 1.5 |  |  |  | 0.5 |  |  |  | − |  |  |  | (0.8 | ) |  |  | − |  |  |  | − |  |  |  | 12.2 |
Preferred Equity |  |  | 33.9 |  |  |  | 12.3 |  |  |  | − |  |  |  | (9.8 | ) |  |  | 5 |  |  |  | 3.2 |  |  |  | − |  |  |  | 44.6 |
Common Equity |  |  | 261.7 |  |  |  | 82.1 |  |  |  | − |  |  |  | − |  |  |  | (0.7 | ) |  |  | − |  |  |  | − |  |  |  | 343.1 |
Total Investments |  | $ | 317.8 |  |  | $ | 90.5 |  |  | $ | 4.5 |  |  | $ | (9.8 | ) |  | $ | 3.5 |  |  | $ | − |  |  | $ | − |  |  | $ | 406.5 |
|  | Fair Value 3/31/11 |  |  | Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |  |  | New Investments |  |  | Divestitures |  |  | Net Changes from Unrealized to Realized |  |  | Conversion of Security from Debt to Equity |  |  | Transfer out of Level 3 |  |  | Fair Value at 3/31/12 |
Debt |  | $ | 12.7 |  |  | $ | (4.6 | ) |  | $ | 6.6 |  |  | $ | (1.0 | ) |  | $ | (2.5 | ) |  |  | − |  |  | $ | − |  |  | $ | 11.2 |
Partnership Interest |  |  | 9.5 |  |  |  | 0.2 |  |  |  | 1.3 |  |  |  | − |  |  |  | − |  |  |  | − |  |  |  | − |  |  |  | 11.0 |
Preferred Equity |  |  | 45.8 |  |  |  | (2.9 | ) |  |  | 6.3 |  |  |  | (6.1 | ) |  |  | (9.2 | ) |  |  | − |  |  |  | − |  |  |  | 33.9 |
Common Equity |  |  | 394.5 |  |  |  | 87.0 |  |  |  | 0.0 |  |  |  | − |  |  |  | 7.3 |  |  |  | − |  |  |  | 227.1 |  |  |  | 261.7 |
Total Investments |  | $ | 462.5 |  |  | $ | 79.7 |  |  | $ | 14.2 |  |  | $ | (7.1 | ) |  | $ | (4.4 | ) |  |  | − |  |  | $ | 227.1 |  |  | $ | 317.8 |
The total unrealized gains included in earnings that related to assets still held at the report date for the years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 were $120,777,969 and $96,949,860, respectively.

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for the fair value of financial instruments (as defined), including financial assets and financial liabilities (collectively, as defined), and the measurements of those instruments as well as disclosures related to the fair value of non-financial assets and liabilities. Such disclosures about the financial instruments, assets, and liabilities would include: (1) the fair value of the required items together with their carrying amounts (as appropriate); (2) for items for which it is not practicable to estimate fair value, disclosure would include: (a) information pertinent to estimating fair value (including, carrying amount, effective interest rate, and maturity, and (b) the reasons why it is not practicable to estimate fair value; (3) significant concentrations of credit risk including: (a) information about the activity, region, or economic characteristics identifying a concentration, (b) the maximum amount of loss the entity is exposed to based on the gross fair value of the related item, (c) policy for requiring collateral or other security and information as to accessing such collateral or security, and (d) the nature and brief description of such collateral or security; (4) quantitative information about market risks and how such risks are managed; (5) for items measured on both a recurring and nonrecurring basis information regarding the inputs used to develop the fair value measurement; and (6) for items presented in the financial statement for which fair value measurement is elected: (a) information necessary to understand the reasons for the election, (b) discussion of the effect of fair value changes on earnings, (c) a description of [similar groups] items for which the election is made and the relation thereof to the balance sheet, the aggregate carrying value of items included in the balance sheet that are not eligible for the election; (7) all other required (as defined) and desired information. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 825 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 16 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=7491637&loc=d3e13504-108611 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 107 -Paragraph 15C, 15D -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 133 -Paragraph 44A, 44B -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 107 -Paragraph 15A -Subparagraph a-d -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 107 -Paragraph 3, 10, 14, 15 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 825 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 10 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=7491637&loc=d3e13433-108611 Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 159 -Paragraph 17-22, 27, 28 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 825 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 21 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=7491637&loc=d3e13537-108611 Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 107 -Paragraph 15B -Subparagraph a, b -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 10: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 157 -Paragraph 32, 33, 34 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 11: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 820 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=7578670&loc=d3e19207-110258 Reference 12: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 825 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 28 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6957238&loc=d3e14064-108612 Reference 13: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 825 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 30 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6957238&loc=d3e14172-108612 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_FairValueDisclosuresTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Details
Name: | us-gaap_InvestmentsAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration