10-K 1 alx10-k123117.htm 10-K
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10‑K

☒ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended: | December 31, 2017

OR

☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from | to |
Commission File Number: | 001-06064 |

| ALEXANDER’S, INC. |
| (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |

Delaware |  | 51-0100517
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |  | (IRS Employer Identification No.)
210 Route 4 East, Paramus, New Jersey |  | 07652
(Address of principal executive offices) |  | (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code | (201) 587-8541

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class |  | Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $1 par value per share |  | New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
YES ☒ NO ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15 (d) of the Act.
YES ☐ NO ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES ☒ NO ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
☒ Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S‑K (section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10‑K or any amendment to this Form 10‑K. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a
smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting
company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

☒ Large Accelerated Filer |  | ☐ Accelerated Filer
☐ Non-Accelerated Filer (Do not check if smaller reporting company) |  | ☐ Smaller Reporting Company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting shares of common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, (i.e., by persons other than officers and directors of Alexander’s, Inc.) was $890,370,000 at June 30, 2017.
As of January 31, 2018, there were 5,107,290 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Part III: Portions of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 17, 2018.

INDEX
|  | Item |  | Financial Information: |  | Page Number
Part I. |  | 1. |  | Business |  | 5
|  | 1A. |  | Risk Factors |  | 7
|  | 1B. |  | Unresolved Staff Comments |  | 17
|  | 2. |  | Properties |  | 18
|  | 3. |  | Legal Proceedings |  | 20
|  | 4. |  | Mine Safety Disclosures |  | 20
Part II. |  | 5. |  | Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |  | 21
|  | 6. |  | Selected Financial Data |  | 23
|  | 7. |  | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |  | 24
|  | 7A. |  | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |  | 34
|  | 8. |  | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |  | 35
|  | 9. |  | Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |  | 56
|  | 9A. |  | Controls and Procedures |  | 56
|  | 9B. |  | Other Information |  | 59
Part III. |  | 10. |  | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance(1) |  | 59
|  | 11. |  | Executive Compensation(1) |  | 60
|  | 12. |  | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters(1) |  | 60
|  | 13. |  | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence(1) |  | 60
|  | 14. |  | Principal Accounting Fees and Services(1) |  | 60
Part IV. |  | 15. |  | Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules |  | 61
|  | 16. |  | Form 10-K Summary |  | 71
Signatures |  |  |  | 72

__________________________
(1) These items are omitted in part or in whole because the registrant will file a definitive Proxy Statement pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after December 31, 2017, portions of which are incorporated by reference herein.
3

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements contained herein constitute forward-looking statements as such term is defined in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. They represent our intentions, plans, expectations and beliefs and are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties. Our future results, financial condition and business may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. You can find many of these statements by looking for words such as “approximates,” “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “plans,” “would,” “may” or other similar expressions in this Annual Report on Form 10‑K. We also note the following forward-looking statements: in the case of our development projects, the estimated completion date, estimated project costs and costs to complete; and estimates of dividends on shares of our common stock. Many of the factors that will determine the outcome of these and our other forward-looking statements are beyond our ability to control or predict. For a further discussion of factors that could materially affect the outcome of our forward-looking statements, see “Item 1A - Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10‑K.
For these statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or the date of any document incorporated by reference. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. We do not undertake any obligation to release publicly, any revisions to our forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
4

PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
GENERAL
Alexander’s, Inc. (NYSE: ALX) is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) incorporated in Delaware, engaged in leasing, managing, developing and redeveloping its properties. All references to “we,” “us,” “our,” “Company” and “Alexander’s” refer to Alexander’s, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. We are managed by, and our properties are leased and developed by, Vornado Realty Trust (“Vornado”) (NYSE: VNO).
We have seven properties in the greater New York City metropolitan area consisting of:
Operating properties

• | 731 Lexington Avenue, a 1,311,000 square foot multi-use building, comprising the entire block bounded by Lexington Avenue, East 59 th Street, Third Avenue and East 58 th Street in Manhattan. The building contains 889,000 and 174,000 of net rentable square feet of office and retail space, respectively, which we own, and 248,000 square feet of residential space consisting of 105 condominium units, which we sold. Bloomberg L.P. (“Bloomberg”) occupies all of the office space. The Home Depot (83,000 square feet), The Container Store (34,000 square feet) and Hennes & Mauritz (27,000 square feet) are the principal retail tenants;

• | Rego Park I, a 343,000 square foot shopping center, located on Queens Boulevard and 63 rd Road in Queens. The center is anchored by a 195,000 square foot Sears department store, a 50,000 square foot Burlington, a 46,000 square foot Bed Bath & Beyond and a 36,000 square foot Marshalls. On April 4, 2017, Sears closed its store at the property. Annual revenue from Sears is approximately $10,600,000, under a lease which expires in March 2021. In its 2016 annual report on Form 10-K, Sears indicated that substantial doubt exists related to its ability to continue as a going concern;

• | Rego Park II, a 609,000 square foot shopping center, adjacent to the Rego Park I shopping center in Queens. The center is anchored by a 145,000 square foot Costco, a 135,000 square foot Century 21 and a 133,000 square foot Kohl’s. In addition, 47,000 square feet is leased to Toys “R” Us/Babies “R” Us (“Toys”), a one-third owned affiliate of Vornado. On September 18, 2017, Toys filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy relief;

• | The Alexander apartment tower, located above our Rego Park II shopping center, contains 312 units aggregating 255,000 square feet and is 94.6% leased as of December 31, 2017;

• | Paramus, located at the intersection of Routes 4 and 17 in Paramus, New Jersey, consists of 30.3 acres of land that is leased to IKEA Property, Inc.; and

• | Flushing, a 167,000 square foot building, located at Roosevelt Avenue and Main Street in Queens, that is sub-leased to New World Mall LLC for the remainder of our ground lease term.

Property to be developed

• | Rego Park III, a 140,000 square foot land parcel adjacent to the Rego Park II shopping center in Queens, at the intersection of Junction Boulevard and the Horace Harding Service Road.

Relationship with Vornado
We are managed by, and our properties are leased and developed by, Vornado, pursuant to various agreements which expire in March of each year and are automatically renewable. Vornado is a fully-integrated REIT with significant experience in managing, leasing, developing, and operating retail and office properties.
As of December 31, 2017, Vornado owned 32.4% of our outstanding common stock. Steven Roth is the Chairman of our Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer, the Managing General Partner of Interstate Properties (“Interstate”), a New Jersey general partnership, and the Chairman of the Board of Trustees and Chief Executive Officer of Vornado. As of December 31, 2017, Mr. Roth, Interstate and its other two general partners, David Mandelbaum and Russell B. Wight, Jr. (who are also directors of the Company and trustees of Vornado) owned, in the aggregate, 26.2% of our outstanding common stock, in addition to the 2.3% they indirectly own through Vornado. Joseph Macnow, our Treasurer, is the Executive Vice President - Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer of Vornado. Matthew Iocco, our Chief Financial Officer, is the Executive Vice President - Chief Accounting Officer of Vornado.
5

Significant Tenant
Bloomberg accounted for revenue of $105,224,000, $104,590,000 and $94,468,000 in the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively, representing approximately 46%, 46% and 45% of our total revenues in each year, respectively. No other tenant accounted for more than 10% of our total revenues. If we were to lose Bloomberg as a tenant, or if Bloomberg were to be unable to fulfill its obligations under its lease, it would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. In order to assist us in our continuing assessment of Bloomberg’s creditworthiness, we receive certain confidential financial information and metrics from Bloomberg. In addition, we access and evaluate financial information regarding Bloomberg from other private sources, as well as publicly available data.
Competition
We operate in a highly competitive environment. All of our properties are located in the greater New York City metropolitan area. We compete with a large number of property owners and developers. Principal factors of competition are the amount of rent charged, attractiveness of location and quality and breadth of services provided. Our success depends upon, among other factors, trends of the global, national and local economies, the financial condition and operating results of current and prospective tenants and customers, the availability and cost of capital, construction and renovation costs, taxes, governmental regulations, legislation, population and employment trends, zoning laws, and our ability to lease, sublease or sell our properties, at profitable levels. Our success is also subject to our ability to refinance existing debt on acceptable terms as it comes due.
Employees
We currently have 77 employees.
Executive Office
Our executive office is located at 210 Route 4 East, Paramus, New Jersey, 07652 and our telephone number is (201) 587-8541.
Available Information
Copies of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, as well as Reports on Forms 3, 4 and 5 regarding officers, directors, and 10% beneficial owners filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a), 15(d) or 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, are available free of charge on our website (www.alx-inc.com) as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Also available on our website are copies of our Audit Committee Charter, Compensation Committee Charter, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Corporate Governance Guidelines. In the event of any changes to these items, revised copies will be made available on our website. Copies of these documents are also available directly from us, free of charge.
In May 2009, Vornado and Interstate each filed with the SEC an amendment to their respective Schedule 13D indicating that they, as a group, own 47.2% of our common stock. This ownership level, together with the shares owned by Messrs. Roth, Mandelbaum and Wight, makes us a “controlled” company for the purposes of the New York Stock Exchange, Inc.’s Corporate Governance Standards (the “NYSE Rules”). This means that we are not required to, among other things, have a majority of the members of our Board of Directors be independent under the NYSE Rules, have all of the members of our Compensation Committee be independent under the NYSE Rules or to have a Nominating Committee. While we have voluntarily complied with a majority of the independence requirements of the NYSE Rules, we are under no obligation to do so and this situation may change at any time.
6

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Material factors that may adversely affect our business, operations and financial condition are summarized below. The risks and uncertainties described herein may not be the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial may also adversely affect our business, operations and financial condition. See “Forward-Looking Statements” contained herein on page 4.
OUR INVESTMENTS ARE CONCENTRATED IN THE GREATER NEW YORK CITY METROPOLITAN AREA. CIRCUMSTANCES AFFECTING THIS AREA GENERALLY COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS.
All of our properties are in the greater New York City metropolitan area and are affected by the economic cycles and risks inherent in that area.
All of our revenues come from properties located in the greater New York City metropolitan area. Real estate markets are subject to economic downturns and we cannot predict how economic conditions will impact this market in either the short or long term. Declines in the economy or declines in the real estate market in this area could hurt our financial performance and the value of our properties. In addition to the factors affecting the national economic condition generally, the factors affecting economic conditions in this area include:

• | financial performance and productivity of the media, advertising, professional services, financial, technology, retail, insurance and real estate industries;

• | business layoffs or downsizing;

• | industry slowdowns;

• | relocations of businesses;

• | changing demographics;

• | increased telecommuting and use of alternative work places;

• | changes in the number of domestic and international tourists to our markets (including, as a result of changes in the relative strengths of world currencies);

• | infrastructure quality;

• | changes in the treatment of the deductibility of state and local taxes; and

• | any oversupply of, or reduced demand for, real estate.

It is impossible for us to assess the future effects of trends in the economic and investment climates of the greater New York City metropolitan region, and more generally of the United States, on the real estate market in this area. Local, national or global economic downturns would negatively affect our business and profitability.
We are subject to risks that affect the general and New York City retail environments.
Certain of our properties are New York City retail properties. As such, these properties are affected by the general and New York City retail environments, including the level of consumer spending and consumer confidence, change in relative strengths of world currencies, the threat of terrorism, increasing competition from discount retailers, outlet malls, retail websites and catalog companies and the impact of technological change upon the retail environment generally. These factors could adversely affect the financial condition of our retail tenants and the willingness of retailers to lease space in our retail locations.
Terrorist attacks, such as those of September 11, 2001 in New York City, may adversely affect the value of our properties and our ability to generate cash flow.
All of our properties are located in the greater New York City metropolitan area, and our most significant property, 731 Lexington Avenue, is located on Lexington Avenue and 59 th Street in Manhattan. In response to a terrorist attack or the perceived threat of terrorism, tenants in this area may choose to relocate their businesses to less populated, lower-profile areas of the United States that may be perceived to be less likely targets of future terrorist activity and fewer customers may choose to patronize businesses in this area. This, in turn, would trigger a decrease in the demand for space in these markets, which could increase vacancies in our properties and force us to lease our properties on less favorable terms. Furthermore, we may experience increased costs for security, equipment and personnel. As a result, the value of our properties and the level of our revenues could decline materially.
7

Natural disasters and the effects of climate change could have a concentrated impact on the area which we operate and could adversely impact our results.
Our investments are in the greater New York City metropolitan area and since they are concentrated along the Eastern Seaboard, natural disasters, including hurricanes, could impact our properties. Potentially adverse consequences of “global warming” could similarly have an impact on our properties. Over time, these conditions could result in declining demand for office space in our buildings or the inability of us to operate the buildings at all. Climate change may also have indirect effects on our business by increasing the cost of (or making unavailable) property insurance on terms we find acceptable, increasing the cost of energy at our properties and requiring us to expend funds as we seek to repair and protect our properties against such risks. The incurrence of these losses, costs or business interruptions may adversely affect our operating and financial results.
REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS’ VALUE AND INCOME FLUCTUATE DUE TO VARIOUS FACTORS.
The value of real estate fluctuates depending on conditions in the general economy and the real estate business. These conditions may also adversely impact our revenues and cash flows.
The factors that affect the value of our real estate include, among other things:

• | global, national, regional and local economic conditions;

• | competition from other available space;

• | local conditions such as an oversupply of space or a reduction in demand for real estate in the area;

• | how well we manage our properties;

• | the development and/or redevelopment of our properties;

• | changes in market rental rates;

• | the timing and costs associated with property improvements and rentals;

• | whether we are able to pass all or portions of any increases in operating costs through to tenants;

• | changes in real estate taxes and other expenses;

• | whether tenants and users such as customers and shoppers consider a property attractive;

• | changes in consumer preferences adversely affecting retailers and retail store values;

• | changes in space utilization by our tenants due to technology, economic conditions and business environment;

• | the financial condition of our tenants, including the extent of tenant bankruptcies or defaults;

• | availability of financing on acceptable terms or at all;

• | inflation or deflation;

• | fluctuations in interest rates;

• | our ability to obtain adequate insurance;

• | changes in zoning laws and taxation;

• | government regulation;

• | consequences of any armed conflict involving, or terrorist attack against, the United States or individual acts of violence in public spaces, including retail centers;

• | potential liability under environmental or other laws or regulations;

• | natural disasters;

• | general competitive factors; and

• | climate changes.

The rents we receive and the occupancy levels at our properties may decline as a result of adverse changes in any of these factors. If our rental revenues and/or occupancy levels decline, we generally would expect to have less cash available to pay our indebtedness and for distribution to our stockholders. In addition, some of our major expenses, including mortgage payments, real estate taxes and maintenance costs generally do not decline when the related rents decline.
8

Capital markets and economic conditions can materially affect our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations as well as the value of an investment in our debt and equity securities.
There are many factors that can affect the value of our equity securities and any debt securities we may issue in the future, including the state of the capital markets and economy. Demand for office and retail space may decline nationwide as it did in 2008 and 2009 due to the economic downturn, bankruptcies, downsizing, layoffs and cost cutting. Government action or inaction may adversely affect the state of the capital markets. The cost and availability of credit may be adversely affected by illiquid credit markets and wider credit spreads, which may adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition, including our results of operations, and the liquidity and financial condition of our tenants. Our inability or the inability of our tenants to timely refinance maturing liabilities and access the capital markets to meet liquidity needs may materially affect our financial condition and results of operations and the value of our equity securities and any debt securities we may issue in the future.
U.S. federal tax reform legislation now and in the future could affect REITs generally, the geographic markets in which we operate, the trading of our shares and our results of operations, both positively and negatively, in ways that are difficult to anticipate.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “2017 Act”) represents sweeping tax reform legislation that makes significant changes to corporate and individual tax rates and the calculation of taxes, as well as international tax rules. As a REIT, we are generally not required to pay federal taxes otherwise applicable to regular corporations if we comply with the various tax regulations governing REITs. Shareholders, however, are generally required to pay taxes on REIT dividends. The 2017 Act and future tax reform legislation could impact our share price or how shareholders and potential investors view an investment in REITs. For example, the decrease in corporate tax rates in the 2017 Act could decrease the attractiveness of the REIT structure relative to companies that are not organized as REITs. In addition, while certain elements of the 2017 Act do not impact us directly as a REIT, they could impact the geographic markets in which we operate as well as our tenants in ways, both positive and negative, that are difficult to anticipate. For example, the limitation in the 2017 Act on the deductibility of certain state and local taxes may make operating in jurisdictions that impose such taxes at higher rates less desirable than operating in jurisdictions imposing such taxes at lower rates. The overall impact of the 2017 Act also depends on the future interpretations and regulations that may be issued by U.S. tax authorities, and it is possible that future guidance could adversely impact us.
Real estate is a competitive business.
We compete with a large number of real estate property owners and developers, some of which may be willing to accept lower returns on their investments. Principal factors of competition are rents charged, attractiveness of location, the quality of the property and the breadth and the quality of services provided. Our success depends upon, among other factors, trends of the global, national and local economies, the financial condition and operating results of current and prospective tenants and customers, availability and cost of capital, construction and renovation costs, taxes, governmental regulations, legislation, population and employment trends, zoning laws, and our ability to lease, sublease or sell our properties, at profitable levels.
We depend on leasing space to tenants on economically favorable terms and collecting rent from tenants who may not be able to pay.
Our financial results depend significantly on leasing space in our properties to tenants on economically favorable terms. In addition, because a majority of our income is derived from renting real property, our income, funds available to pay indebtedness and funds available for distribution to stockholders will decrease if certain of our tenants cannot pay their rent or if we are not able to maintain our occupancy levels on favorable terms. If a tenant does not pay its rent, we might not be able to enforce our rights as landlord without delays and might incur substantial legal and other costs. During periods of economic adversity for retailers or otherwise, there may be an increase in the number of tenants that cannot pay their rent and an increase in vacancy rates.
We may be unable to renew leases or relet space as leases expire.
When our tenants decide not to renew their leases upon their expiration, we may not be able to relet the space. Even if tenants do renew or we can relet the space, the terms of renewal or reletting, taking into account among other things, the cost of improvements to the property and leasing commissions, may be less favorable than the terms in the expired leases. In addition, changes in space utilization by our tenants may impact our ability to renew or relet space without the need to incur substantial costs in renovating or redesigning the internal configuration of the relevant property. If we are unable to promptly renew the leases or relet the space at similar rates or if we incur substantial costs in renewing or reletting the space, our cash flow and ability to service debt obligations and pay dividends and distributions to stockholders could be adversely affected.
9

Bankruptcy or insolvency of tenants may decrease our revenues, net income and available cash.
From time to time, some of our tenants have declared bankruptcy, and other tenants may declare bankruptcy or become insolvent in the future. The bankruptcy or insolvency of a major tenant could cause us to have difficulty leasing the remainder of the affected property. Our leases generally do not contain restrictions designed to ensure the creditworthiness of our tenants. As a result, the bankruptcy or insolvency of a major tenant or multiple tenants could result in a lower level of net income and funds available to pay our indebtedness or make distributions to stockholders.
731 Lexington Avenue accounts for a substantial portion of our revenues. Loss of or damage to the building would adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
731 Lexington Avenue accounted for revenue of $148,324,000, $147,567,000 and $137,411,000 in the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively, representing approximately 64%, 65% and 66% of our total revenues in each year, respectively. Loss of or damage to the building in excess of our insurance coverage, including as a result of a terrorist attack, would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Bloomberg represents a significant portion of our revenues. Loss of Bloomberg as a tenant or deterioration in Bloomberg’s credit quality could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Bloomberg accounted for revenue of $105,224,000, $104,590,000 and $94,468,000 in the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively, representing approximately 46%, 46% and 45% of our total revenues in each year, respectively. No other tenant accounted for more than 10% of our total revenues. If we were to lose Bloomberg as a tenant, or if Bloomberg were to be unable to fulfill its obligations under its lease, it would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
We face risks associated with our tenants being designated “Prohibited Persons” by the Office of Foreign Assets Control and similar requirements.
Pursuant to Executive Order 13224 and other laws, the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the United States Department of the Treasury (“OFAC”) maintains a list of persons designated as terrorists or who are otherwise blocked or banned (“Prohibited Persons”) from conducting business or engaging in transactions in the United States and thereby restricts our doing business with such persons. In addition, our leases, loans and other agreements may require us to comply with OFAC and related requirements, and any failure to do so may result in a breach of such agreements. If a tenant or other party with whom we conduct business is placed on the OFAC list or is otherwise a party with whom we are prohibited from doing business, we may be required to terminate the lease or other agreement. Any such termination could result in a loss of revenue or otherwise negatively affect our financial results and cash flows.
Our business and operations would suffer in the event of system failures.
Despite system redundancy, the implementation of security measures and the existence of a disaster recovery plan for our internal information technology systems, our systems are vulnerable to damages from any number of sources, including computer viruses, unauthorized access, energy blackouts, natural disasters, terrorism, war and telecommunication failures. Any system failure or accident that causes interruptions in our operations could result in a material disruption to our business. We may also incur additional costs to remedy damages caused by such disruptions.
10

The occurrence of cyber incidents, or a deficiency in our cyber security, could negatively impact our business by causing a disruption to our operations, a compromise or corruption of our confidential information, and/or damage to our business relationships or reputation, all of which could negatively impact our financial results.
We face risks associated with security breaches, whether through cyber attacks or cyber intrusions over the Internet, malware, computer viruses, attachments to e-mails, persons who access our systems from inside or outside our organization, and other significant disruptions of our IT networks and related systems. The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyber attack or cyber intrusion, including by computer hackers, foreign governments and cyber terrorists, has generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. Our IT networks and related systems are essential to the operation of our business and our ability to perform day-to-day operations (including managing our building systems) and, in some cases, may be critical to the operations of certain of our tenants. Although we make efforts to maintain the security and integrity of these types of IT networks and related systems, and we have implemented various measures to manage the risk of a security breach or disruption, there can be no assurance that our security efforts and measures will be effective or that attempted security breaches or disruptions would not be successful or damaging. Even the most well protected information, networks, systems and facilities remain potentially vulnerable because the techniques used in such attempted security breaches evolve and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, and in some cases are designed to not be detected and, in fact, may not be detected. Accordingly, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate security barriers or other preventative measures, and thus it is impossible for us to entirely mitigate this risk.
A security breach or other significant disruption involving our IT networks and related systems could disrupt the proper functioning of our networks and systems and therefore our operations and/or those of certain of our tenants; result in the unauthorized access to, and destruction, loss, theft, misappropriation or release of, proprietary, confidential, sensitive or otherwise valuable information of ours or others, which others could use to compete against us or which could expose us to damage claims by third-parties for disruptive, destructive or otherwise harmful purposes and outcomes; result in our inability to maintain the building systems relied upon by our tenants for the efficient use of their leased space; require significant management attention and resources to remedy any damages that result; subject us to claims for breach of contract, damages, credits, penalties or termination of leases or other agreements; or damage our reputation among our tenants and investors generally. Any or all of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We may incur significant costs to comply with environmental laws and environmental contamination may impair our ability to lease and/or sell real estate.
Our operations and properties are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations concerning the protection of the environment, including air and water quality, hazardous or toxic substances and health and safety. Under some environmental laws, a current or previous owner or operator of real estate may be required to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances released at a property. The owner or operator may also be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage or personal injuries and for investigation and clean-up costs incurred by those parties because of the contamination. These laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of the release of the substances or caused the release. The presence of contamination or the failure to remediate contamination may also impair our ability to sell or lease real estate or to borrow using the real estate as collateral. Other laws and regulations govern indoor and outdoor air quality including those that can require the abatement or removal of asbestos-containing materials in the event of damage, demolition, renovation or remodeling and also govern emissions of and exposure to asbestos fibers in the air. The maintenance and removal of lead paint and certain electrical equipment containing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are also regulated by federal and state laws. We are also subject to risks associated with human exposure to chemical or biological contaminants such as molds, pollens, viruses and bacteria which, above certain levels, can be alleged to be connected to allergic or other health effects and symptoms in susceptible individuals. We could incur fines for environmental compliance and be held liable for the costs of remedial action with respect to the foregoing regulated substances or related claims arising out of environmental contamination or human exposure to contamination at or from our properties.
Each of our properties has been subjected to varying degrees of environmental assessment. To date, these environmental assessments have not revealed any environmental condition material to our business. However, identification of new compliance concerns or undiscovered areas of contamination, changes in the extent or known scope of contamination, human exposure to contamination or changes in clean-up or compliance requirements could result in significant costs to us.
In addition, we may become subject to costs or taxes, or increases therein, associated with natural resource or energy usage (such as a “carbon tax”). These costs or taxes could increase our operating costs and decrease the cash available to pay our obligations or distribute to equity holders.
11

Some of our potential losses may not be covered by insurance.
We maintain general liability insurance with limits of $300,000,000 per occurrence and per property, and all-risk property and rental value insurance coverage with limits of $1.7 billion per occurrence, including coverage for acts of terrorism, with sub-limits for certain perils such as floods and earthquakes on each of our properties.
Fifty Ninth Street Insurance Company, LLC (“FNSIC”), our wholly owned consolidated subsidiary, acts as a direct insurer for coverage for acts of terrorism, including nuclear, biological, chemical and radiological (“NBCR”) acts, as defined by the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act, which expires in December 2020. Coverage for acts of terrorism (including NBCR acts) is up to $1.7 billion per occurrence and in the aggregate. Coverage for acts of terrorism (excluding NBCR acts) is fully reinsured by third party insurance companies and the Federal government with no exposure to FNSIC. For NBCR acts, FNSIC is responsible for a $293,000 deductible ($306,000 effective January 1, 2018) and 17% of the balance (18% effective January 1, 2018) of a covered loss, and the Federal government is responsible for the remaining 83% (82% effective January 1, 2018) of a covered loss. We are ultimately responsible for any loss incurred by FNSIC.
We continue to monitor the state of the insurance market and the scope and costs of coverage for acts of terrorism. However, we cannot anticipate what coverage will be available on commercially reasonable terms in the future. We are responsible for deductibles and losses in excess of our insurance coverage, which could be material.
Our mortgage loans are non-recourse to us and contain customary covenants requiring us to maintain insurance. Although we believe that we have adequate insurance coverage for purposes of these agreements, we may not be able to obtain an equivalent amount of coverage at reasonable costs in the future. Further, if lenders insist on greater coverage than we are able to obtain, it could adversely affect our ability to finance or refinance our properties.
Compliance or failure to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act or other safety regulations and requirements could result in substantial costs.
The Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) generally requires that public buildings, including our properties, meet certain federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. Noncompliance could result in the imposition of fines by the federal government or the award of damages to private litigants and/or legal fees to their counsel. If, under the ADA, we are required to make substantial alterations and capital expenditures in one or more of our properties, including the removal of access barriers, it could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations, as well as the amount of cash available for distribution to stockholders.
Our properties are subject to various federal, state and local regulatory requirements, such as state and local fire and life safety requirements. If we fail to comply with these requirements, we could incur fines or private damage awards. We do not know whether existing requirements will change or whether compliance with future requirements will require significant unanticipated expenditures that will affect our cash flow and results of operations.
Changes in the method pursuant to which the LIBOR rates are determined and potential phasing out of LIBOR after 2021 may affect our financial results.
The chief executive of the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”), which regulates LIBOR, has recently announced that the FCA intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. It is not possible to predict the effect of these changes, other reforms or the establishment of alternative reference rates in the United Kingdom or elsewhere. Furthermore, in the United States, efforts to identify a set of alternative U.S. dollar reference interest rates include proposals by the Alternative Reference Rates Committee of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. On August 24, 2017, the Federal Reserve Board requested public comment on a proposal by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, in cooperation with the Office of Financial Research, to produce three new reference rates intended to serve as alternatives to LIBOR. These alternative rates are based on overnight repurchase agreement transactions secured by U.S. Treasury Securities. The Federal Reserve Bank said that the publication of these alternative rates is targeted to commence by mid-2018.
Any changes announced by the FCA, including the FCA Announcement, other regulators or any other successor governance or oversight body, or future changes adopted by such body, in the method pursuant to which the LIBOR rates are determined may result in a sudden or prolonged increase or decrease in the reported LIBOR rates. If that were to occur, the level of interest payments we incur may change. In addition, although certain of our LIBOR based obligations provide for alternative methods of calculating the interest rate payable on certain of our obligations if LIBOR is not reported, which include requesting certain rates from major reference banks in London or New York, or alternatively using LIBOR for the immediately preceding interest period or using the initial interest rate, as applicable, uncertainty as to the extent and manner of future changes may result in interest rates and/or payments that are higher than, lower than or that do not otherwise correlate over time with the interest rates and/or payments that would have been made on our obligations if LIBOR rate was available in its current form.
12

We depend upon anchor tenants to attract shoppers at our Rego Park I and II retail properties.
Our Rego Park I and II retail properties are anchored by well-known department stores and other tenants who generate shopping traffic. The value of these properties would be adversely affected if our anchor tenants failed to meet their contractual obligations, sought concessions in order to continue operations or ceased their operations, including as a result of bankruptcy. If the sales of stores operating in our properties were to decline significantly due to economic conditions, closing of anchors or for other reasons, tenants may be unable to pay their minimum rents or expense recovery charges. In the event of a default by a tenant or anchor, we may experience delays and costs in enforcing our rights as landlord. On April 4, 2017, Sears closed its 195,000 square foot store at our Rego Park I property. Annual revenue from Sears is approximately $10,600,000, under a lease which expires in March 2021. In its 2016 annual report on Form 10-K, Sears indicated that substantial doubt exists related to its ability to continue as a going concern.
WE MAY ACQUIRE OR SELL ASSETS OR DEVELOP PROPERTIES. OUR FAILURE OR INABILITY TO CONSUMMATE THESE TRANSACTIONS OR MANAGE THE RESULTS OF THESE TRANSACTIONS COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL RESULTS.
We may acquire, develop, or redevelop properties and this may create risks.
Although our stated business strategy is not to engage in acquisitions, we may acquire or develop properties when we believe that an acquisition or development project is otherwise consistent with our business strategy. We may not succeed in (i) developing, redeveloping or acquiring properties; (ii) completing these activities on time or within budget; and (iii) leasing or selling developed, redeveloped or acquired properties at amounts sufficient to cover our costs. Competition in these activities could also significantly increase our costs. Difficulties in integrating acquisitions may prove costly or time-consuming and could divert management’s attention. Acquisitions or developments in new markets or types of properties where we do not have the same level of market knowledge may result in weaker than anticipated performance. We may also abandon acquisition or development opportunities that we have begun pursuing and consequently fail to recover expenses already incurred. Furthermore, we may be exposed to the liabilities of properties acquired, some of which we may not be aware of at the time of acquisition.
It may be difficult to buy and sell real estate quickly, which may limit our flexibility.
Real estate investments are relatively difficult to buy and sell quickly. Consequently, we may have limited ability to vary our portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions. Moreover, our ability to buy, sell, or finance real estate assets may be adversely affected during periods of uncertainty or unfavorable conditions in the credit markets as we, or potential buyers of our assets, may experience difficulty in obtaining financing.
We have an investment in marketable equity securities. The value of this investment may decline as a result of operating performance or economic or market conditions.
We have an investment in Macerich, a retail shopping center company. As of December 31, 2017, this investment had a carrying amount of $35,156,000. A significant decline in the value of this investment due to, among other reasons, Macerich’s operating performance or economic or market conditions, may result in the recognition of an impairment loss, which could be material.
OUR ORGANIZATIONAL AND FINANCIAL STRUCTURE GIVES RISE TO OPERATIONAL AND FINANCIAL RISKS.
Substantially all of our assets are owned by subsidiaries. We depend on dividends and distributions from these subsidiaries. The creditors of these subsidiaries are entitled to amounts payable to them by the subsidiaries before the subsidiaries may pay any dividends or distributions to us.
Substantially all of our properties and assets are held through our subsidiaries. We depend on cash distributions and dividends from our subsidiaries for substantially all of our cash flow. The creditors of each of our direct and indirect subsidiaries are entitled to payment of that subsidiary’s obligations to them when due and payable before that subsidiary may make distributions or dividends to us. Thus, our ability to pay dividends, if any, to our security holders depends on our subsidiaries’ ability to first satisfy their obligations to their creditors and our ability to satisfy our obligations, if any, to our creditors.
In addition, our participation in any distribution of the assets of any of our direct or indirect subsidiaries upon the liquidation, reorganization or insolvency of the subsidiary, is only after the claims of the creditors, including trade creditors, and preferred security holders, if any, of the applicable direct or indirect subsidiaries are satisfied.
13

Our existing financing documents contain covenants and restrictions that may restrict our operational and financial flexibility.
As of December 31, 2017, we had outstanding mortgage indebtedness of $1,252,440,000, secured by four of our properties. These mortgages contain covenants that limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness on these properties, provide for lender approval of tenants’ leases in certain circumstances, and provide for yield maintenance or defeasance premiums to prepay them. These mortgages may significantly restrict our operational and financial flexibility. In addition, if we were to fail to perform our obligations under existing indebtedness or become insolvent or were liquidated, secured creditors would be entitled to payment in full from the proceeds of the sale of the pledged assets prior to any proceeds being paid to other creditors or to any holders of our securities. In such an event, it is possible that we would have insufficient assets remaining to make payments to other creditors or to any holders of our securities.
We have a substantial amount of indebtedness that could affect our future operations.
As of December 31, 2017 total debt outstanding was $1,252,440,000. We are subject to the risks normally associated with debt financing, including the risk that our cash flow from operations will be insufficient to meet required debt service. Our debt service costs generally will not be reduced if developments at the property, such as the entry of new competitors or the loss of major tenants, cause a reduction in the income from the property. Should such events occur, our operations may be adversely affected. If a property is mortgaged to secure payment of indebtedness and income from such property is insufficient to pay that indebtedness, the property could be foreclosed upon by the mortgagee resulting in a loss of income and a decline in our total asset value.
We have outstanding debt, and the amount of debt and its cost may increase and refinancing may not be available on acceptable terms.
As of December 31, 2017, total debt outstanding was $1,252,440,000 and our ratio of total debt to total enterprise value was 42.2%. “Enterprise value” means the market equity value of our common stock, plus debt, less cash and cash equivalents at such date. In addition, we have significant debt service obligations. For the year ended December 31, 2017, our scheduled cash payments for principal and interest were $30,701,000. In the future, we may incur additional debt, and thus increase the ratio of total debt to total enterprise value. If our level of indebtedness increases, there may be an increased risk of default which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, in a rising interest rate environment, the cost of refinancing our existing debt and any new debt or market rate security or instrument may increase. Continued uncertainty in the equity and credit markets may negatively impact our ability to obtain financing on reasonable terms or at all, which may negatively affect our ability to refinance our debt.
We might fail to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT, and may be required to pay income taxes at corporate rates.
Although we believe that we will remain organized and will continue to operate so as to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we might fail to remain qualified. Qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes is governed by highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations and depends on various facts and circumstances that are not entirely within our control. In addition, legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions may significantly change the relevant tax laws and/or the federal income tax consequences of qualifying as a REIT. If, with respect to any taxable year, we fail to maintain our qualification as a REIT and do not qualify under statutory relief provisions, we could not deduct distributions to stockholders in computing our taxable income and would have to pay federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. The federal income tax payable would include any applicable alternative minimum tax. If we had to pay federal income tax, the amount of money available to distribute to stockholders and pay our indebtedness would be reduced for the year or years involved, and we would no longer be required to make distributions to stockholders in that taxable year and in future years until we were able to qualify as a REIT and did so. In addition, we would also be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost, unless we were entitled to relief under the relevant statutory provisions.
We face possible adverse changes in tax laws, which may result in an increase in our tax liability.
From time to time changes in state and local tax laws or regulations are enacted, which may result in an increase in our tax liability. The shortfall in tax revenues for states and municipalities in recent years may lead to an increase in the frequency and size of such changes. If such changes occur, we may be required to pay additional taxes on our assets or income. These increased tax costs could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and the amount of cash available for payment of dividends.
Loss of our key personnel could harm our operations and adversely affect the value of our common stock.
We are dependent on the efforts of Steven Roth, our Chief Executive Officer. Although we believe that we could find a replacement, the loss of his services could harm our operations and adversely affect the value of our common stock.
14

ALEXANDER’S CHARTER DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE LAW MAY HINDER ANY ATTEMPT TO ACQUIRE US.
Provisions in Alexander’s certificate of incorporation and by laws, as well as provisions of the Code and Delaware corporate law, may delay or prevent a change in control of the Company or a tender offer, even if such action might be beneficial to stockholders, and limit the stockholders’ opportunity to receive a potential premium for their shares of common stock over then prevailing market prices.
Primarily to facilitate maintenance of its qualification as a REIT, Alexander’s certificate of incorporation generally prohibits ownership, directly, indirectly or beneficially, by any single stockholder of more than 9.9% of the outstanding shares of preferred stock of any class or 4.9% of outstanding common stock of any class. The Board of Directors may waive or modify these ownership limits with respect to one or more persons if it is satisfied that ownership in excess of these limits will not jeopardize Alexander’s status as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. In addition, the Board of Directors has, subject to certain conditions and limitations, exempted Vornado and certain of its affiliates from these ownership limitations. Stock owned in violation of these ownership limits will be subject to the loss of rights and other restrictions. These ownership limits may have the effect of inhibiting or impeding a change in control.
Alexander’s Board of Directors is divided into three classes of directors. Directors of each class are chosen for three-year staggered terms. Staggered terms of directors may have the effect of delaying or preventing changes in control or management, even though changes in management or a change in control might be in the best interest of our stockholders.
In addition, Alexander’s charter documents authorize the Board of Directors to:

• | cause Alexander’s to issue additional authorized but unissued common stock or preferred stock;

• | classify or reclassify, in one or more series, any unissued preferred stock; and

• | set the preferences, rights and other terms of any classified or reclassified stock that Alexander’s issues.

The Board of Directors could establish a series of preferred stock with terms that could delay, deter or prevent a change in control of Alexander’s or other transaction that might involve a premium price or otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders, although the Board of Directors does not, at present, intend to establish a series of preferred stock of this kind. Alexander’s charter documents contain other provisions that may delay, deter or prevent a change in control of the Company or other transaction that might involve a premium price or otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders.
In addition, Vornado, Interstate and its three general partners (each of whom are both trustees of Vornado and Directors of Alexander’s) together beneficially own approximately 58.6% of our outstanding shares of common stock. This degree of ownership is likely to reduce the possibility of a tender offer or an attempt to change control of the Company by a third party.
We may change our policies without obtaining the approval of our stockholders.
Our operating and financial policies, including our policies with respect to acquisitions of real estate or other assets, growth, operations, indebtedness, capitalization and dividends, are exclusively determined by our Board of Directors. Accordingly, our stockholders do not control these policies.
15

OUR OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE AND RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS MAY GIVE RISE TO CONFLICTS OF INTEREST.
Steven Roth, Vornado and Interstate may exercise substantial influence over us. They and some of our other directors and officers have interests or positions in other entities that may compete with us.
As of December 31, 2017, Interstate and its partners owned approximately 7.2% of the common shares of beneficial interest of Vornado and approximately 26.2% of our outstanding common stock. Steven Roth, David Mandelbaum and Russell B. Wight, Jr. are the partners of Interstate. Mr. Roth is the Chairman of our Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer, the Chairman of the Board of Trustees and Chief Executive Officer of Vornado and the Managing General Partner of Interstate. Mr. Wight and Mr. Mandelbaum are both trustees of Vornado and members of our Board of Directors. In addition, Vornado manages and leases the real estate assets of Interstate.
As of December 31, 2017, Vornado owned 32.4% of our outstanding common stock, in addition to the 26.2% owned by Interstate and its partners. In addition to the relationships described in the immediately preceding paragraph, Dr. Richard West is a trustee of Vornado and a member of our Board of Directors and Joseph Macnow, our Treasurer, is the Executive Vice President - Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer of Vornado. Matthew Iocco is our Chief Financial Officer and the Executive Vice President - Chief Accounting Officer of Vornado.
Because of their overlapping interests, Vornado, Mr. Roth, Interstate and the other individuals noted in the preceding paragraphs may have substantial influence over Alexander’s, and on the outcome of any matters submitted to Alexander’s stockholders for approval. In addition, certain decisions concerning our operations or financial structure may present conflicts of interest among Vornado, Messrs. Roth, Mandelbaum and Wight and Interstate and other security holders. Vornado, Mr. Roth and Interstate may, in the future, engage in a wide variety of activities in the real estate business which may result in conflicts of interest with respect to matters affecting us, such as, which of these entities or persons, if any, may take advantage of potential business opportunities, the business focus of these entities, the types of properties and geographic locations in which these entities make investments, potential competition between business activities conducted, or sought to be conducted, by us, competition for properties and tenants, possible corporate transactions such as acquisitions, and other strategic decisions affecting the future of these entities.
There may be conflicts of interest between Vornado, its affiliates and us.
Vornado manages, develops and leases our properties under agreements that have one-year terms expiring in March of each year, which are automatically renewable. Because we share common senior management with Vornado and because four of the trustees of Vornado are on our Board of Directors, the terms of the foregoing agreements and any future agreements may not be comparable to those we could have negotiated with an unaffiliated third party.
For a description of Interstate’s ownership of Vornado and Alexander’s, see “Steven Roth, Vornado and Interstate may exercise substantial influence over us. They and some of our other directors and officers have interests or positions in other entities that may compete with us.” above.
16

THE NUMBER OF SHARES OF ALEXANDER’S COMMON STOCK AND THE MARKET FOR THOSE SHARES GIVE RISE TO VARIOUS RISKS.
The trading price of our common shares has been volatile and may continue to fluctuate.
The trading price of our common shares has been volatile and may continue to fluctuate widely as a result of a number of factors, many of which are outside of our control. In addition, the stock market is subject to fluctuations in the share prices and trading volumes that affect the market prices of the shares of many companies. These broad market fluctuations have in the past and may in the future adversely affect the market price of our common shares. Among the factors that could affect the price of our common shares are:

• | our financial condition and performance;

• | the financial condition of our tenants, including the extent of tenant bankruptcies or defaults;

• | actual or anticipated quarterly fluctuations in our operating results and financial condition;

• | our dividend policy;

• | the reputation of REITs and real estate investments generally and the attractiveness of REIT equity securities in comparison to other equity securities, including securities issued by other real estate companies, and fixed income securities;

• | uncertainty and volatility in the equity and credit markets;

• | fluctuations in interest rates;

• | changes in revenue or earnings estimates or publication of research reports and recommendations by financial analysts or actions taken by rating agencies with respect to our securities or those of other REITs;

• | failure to meet analysts’ revenue or earnings estimates;

• | speculation in the press or investment community;

• | strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions or restructurings;

• | the extent of institutional investor interest in us;

• | the extent of short-selling of our common shares and the shares of our competitors;

• | fluctuations in the stock price and operating results of our competitors;

• | general financial and economic market conditions and, in particular, developments related to market conditions for REITs and other real estate related companies;

• | domestic and international economic factors unrelated to our performance;

• | changes in tax laws and rules; and

• | all other risk factors addressed elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

A significant decline in our stock price could result in substantial losses for stockholders.
Alexander’s has additional shares of its common stock available for future issuance, which could decrease the market price of the common stock currently outstanding.
The interest of our current stockholders could be diluted if we issue additional equity securities. As of December 31, 2017, we had authorized but unissued 4,826,550 shares of common stock, par value of $1.00 per share and 3,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share; of which 8,692 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance upon redemption of the deferred stock units previously granted to our Board of Directors. In addition, 497,095 shares are available for future grant under the terms of our 2016 Omnibus Stock Plan. These awards may be granted in the form of options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, deferred stock units, or other equity-based interests, and if granted, would reduce that number of shares available for future grants, provided however that an award that may be settled only in cash, would not reduce the number of shares available under the plan. We cannot predict the impact that future issuances of common or preferred stock or any exercise of outstanding options or grants of additional equity-based interests would have on the market price of our common stock.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
There are no unresolved comments from the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
17

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The following table shows the location, ownership, approximate size (excluding parking garages) and occupancy of each of our properties as of December 31, 2017.

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Average |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Annualized |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Lease Expiration (s) |  |
|  |  |  | Land |  | Building |  | Occupancy |  | Rent Per |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Original |  |  |  | Option |  |
Property |  | Acreage |  | Square Feet |  | Rate |  | Square Foot |  | (1) |  | Tenants |  |  |  | Term |  | (2) |  | Term |  | (3)
Operating Properties: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
731 Lexington Avenue |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | New York, New York |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Office |  |  |  | 889,000 |  |  | 100% |  | $ | 115.33 |  |  |  |  | Bloomberg L.P. |  |  |  | 2029 |  |  |  | 2039 |  |
|  | Retail |  |  |  | 83,000 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | The Home Depot |  |  |  | 2025 |  |  |  | 2035 |  |
|  |  |  |  |  | 34,000 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | The Container Store |  |  |  | 2021 |  |  |  | N/A |  |
|  |  |  |  |  | 27,000 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Hennes & Mauritz |  |  |  | 2019 |  |  |  | N/A |  |
|  |  |  |  |  | 30,000 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Various |  |  |  | Various |  |  |  | Various |  |
|  |  |  |  |  | 174,000 |  |  | 99% |  | 181.72 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  | 1.9 |  | 1,063,000 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Rego Park I |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Queens, New York |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  | 195,000 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Sears (4) |  |  |  | 2021 |  |  |  | N/A |  |
|  |  |  |  |  | 50,000 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Burlington |  |  |  | 2022 |  |  |  | 2027 |  |
|  |  |  |  |  | 46,000 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Bed Bath & Beyond |  |  |  | 2021 |  |  |  | N/A |  |
|  |  |  |  |  | 36,000 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Marshalls |  |  |  | 2021 |  |  |  | N/A |  |
|  |  |  |  |  | 16,000 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Old Navy |  |  |  | 2021 |  |  |  | N/A |  |
|  |  |  | 4.8 |  | 343,000 |  |  | 100% |  | 40.78 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Rego Park II |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Queens, New York |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  | 145,000 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Costco |  |  |  | 2034 |  |  |  | 2059 |  |
|  |  |  |  |  | 135,000 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Century 21 |  |  |  | 2030 |  |  |  | 2050 |  |
|  |  |  |  |  | 133,000 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Kohl’s |  |  |  | 2030 |  |  |  | 2050 |  |
|  |  |  |  |  | 47,000 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Toys (5) |  |  |  | 2021 |  |  |  | 2036 |  |
|  |  |  |  |  | 149,000 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Various |  |  |  | Various |  |  |  | Various |  |
|  |  |  | 6.6 |  | 609,000 |  |  | 100% |  | 44.72 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
The Alexander apartment tower, 312 units |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Queens, New York |  | — |  | 255,000 |  |  | 95% |  | 44.82 |  |  | (6) |  | Residential |  |  |  | (7) |  |  |  | N/A |  |
Paramus |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Paramus, New Jersey |  | 30.3 |  | — |  |  | 100% |  | — |  |  |  |  | IKEA (ground lessee) |  |  |  | 2041 |  |  |  | N/A |  |
Flushing |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Queens, New York (ground leased |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | through January 2037) |  | 1 |  | 167,000 |  |  | 100% |  | 17.36 |  |  |  |  | New World Mall LLC |  |  |  | 2027 |  |  |  | 2037 |  |
Property to be Developed: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Rego Park III, adjacent to Rego Park II |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Queens, New York |  | 3.2 |  | — |  |  | — |  | — |  |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |  |  | — |  |
|  |  |  |  |  | 2,437,000 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
(1) |  | Represents the contractual weighted average rent per square foot, which excludes the impact of tenant concessions (such as free rent) and tenant reimbursements, as of December 31, 2017. For a discussion of our leasing activity, see Item 7 - Overview - Square Footage, Occupancy and Leasing Activity.
(2) |  | Represents the year in which the tenant’s lease expires, without consideration of any renewal or extension options. Lease expiration dates are based on noncancellable lease terms and do not extend beyond any early termination rights that tenants may have under their lease.
(3) |  | Represents the year in which the tenant’s lease expires if all renewal or extension options are exercised.
(4) |  | On April 4, 2017, Sears closed its store at the property. In its 2016 annual report on Form 10-K, Sears indicated that substantial doubt exists related to its ability to continue as a going concern.
(5) |  | On September 18, 2017, Toys filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy relief.
(6) |  | Average monthly rent per unit is $3,078.
(7) |  | Residential tenants have one or two year leases.

18

Operating Properties
731 Lexington Avenue
731 Lexington Avenue, a 1,311,000 square foot multi-use building, comprises the entire block bounded by Lexington Avenue, East 59 th Street, Third Avenue and East 58 th Street in Manhattan, New York, and is situated in the heart of one of Manhattan’s busiest business and shopping districts, with convenient access to several subway and bus lines. The property is located across the street from Bloomingdale’s flagship store and only a few blocks away from Fifth Avenue and 57 th Street. The building contains 889,000 and 174,000 of net rentable square feet of office and retail space, respectively, which we own, and 248,000 square feet of residential space consisting of 105 condominium units, which we sold. Bloomberg occupies all of the office space. The Home Depot (83,000 square feet), The Container Store (34,000 square feet) and Hennes & Mauritz (27,000 square feet) are the principal retail tenants.
The office portion of 731 Lexington Avenue is encumbered by a mortgage loan with a balance of $500,000,000 as of December 31, 2017. The interest-only loan is at LIBOR plus 0.90% (2.38% as of December 31, 2017) and matures in June 2020, with four one-year extension options. In connection therewith, we purchased an interest rate cap with a notional amount of $500,000,000 that caps LIBOR at a rate of 6.0%.
The retail portion of 731 Lexington Avenue is encumbered by a mortgage loan with a balance of $350,000,000 as of December 31, 2017. The interest-only loan is at LIBOR plus 1.40% (2.78% as of December 31, 2017) and matures in August 2020, with two one-year extension options.
Rego Park I
Rego Park I, a 343,000 square foot shopping center, located on Queens Boulevard and 63 rd Road in Queens, New York, is anchored by a 195,000 square foot Sears department store, a 50,000 square foot Burlington, a 46,000 square foot Bed Bath & Beyond and a 36,000 square foot Marshalls. On April 4, 2017, Sears closed its store at the property. Annual revenue from Sears is approximately $10,600,000, under a lease which expires in March 2021. In its 2016 annual report on Form 10-K, Sears indicated that substantial doubt exists related to its ability to continue as a going concern. The center contains a parking deck (1,241 spaces) that provides for paid parking.
The center is encumbered by a 100% cash collateralized loan with a balance of $78,246,000 as of December 31, 2017. The loan bears interest at 0.35%, is prepayable at any time without penalty and matures in March 2018.
Rego Park II
Rego Park II, a 609,000 square foot shopping center, adjacent to the Rego Park I shopping center in Queens, New York, is anchored by a 145,000 square foot Costco, a 135,000 square foot Century 21 and a 133,000 square foot Kohl’s. In addition, 47,000 square feet is leased to Toys, a one-third owned affiliate of Vornado. On September 18, 2017, Toys filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy relief. The center contains a parking deck (1,326 spaces) that provides for paid parking.
This center is encumbered by a first mortgage loan with a balance of $256,194,000 as of December 31, 2017. The loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.85% (3.42% as of December 31, 2017) and matures in November 2018. On July 28, 2017, we invested $200,000,000 to participate in the loan and are entitled to interest at LIBOR plus 1.60% (3.17% as of December 31, 2017).
The Alexander Apartment Tower
The Alexander apartment tower, located above our Rego Park II shopping center, contains 312 units aggregating 255,000 square feet and is 94.6% leased as of December 31, 2017.
19

Paramus
We own 30.3 acres of land located at the intersection of Routes 4 and 17 in Paramus, New Jersey. The land is located directly across from the Garden State Plaza regional shopping mall and is within two miles of three other regional shopping malls and ten miles of New York City. The land has been ground leased to IKEA Property, Inc. since 2001. The lease expires in 2041, with a purchase option in 2021 for $75,000,000. The property is encumbered by a $68,000,000 interest-only mortgage loan with a fixed rate of 2.90%, which matures on October 5, 2018. The annual triple-net rent is the sum of $700,000 plus the amount of debt service on the mortgage loan. If the purchase option is exercised, we will receive net cash proceeds of approximately $7,000,000 and recognize a gain on sale of land of approximately $60,000,000. If the purchase option is not exercised, the triple-net rent for the last 20 years would include debt service sufficient to fully amortize $68,000,000 over the remaining 20-year lease term.
Flushing
Flushing is located on Roosevelt Avenue and Main Street in the downtown, commercial section of Flushing, Queens, New York. Roosevelt Avenue and Main Street are active shopping districts and there are many national retailers located in the area. A subway entrance is located directly in front of the property with bus service across the street. The property comprises a four-floor building containing 167,000 square feet and a parking garage, which is sub-leased to New World Mall LLC for the remainder of our ground lease term, which expires in 2027 and has one 10-year extension option.
Property to be Developed
Rego Park III
We own 140,000 square feet of land adjacent to the Rego Park II shopping center in Queens, New York, at the intersection of Junction Boulevard and the Horace Harding Service Road. The land is currently being used for paid public parking. In 2016, the Company began the entitlement process.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are from time to time involved in legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, after consultation with our legal counsel, the outcome of such matters will not have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
In June 2014, Sears Roebuck and Co. (“Sears”) filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court of the State of New York against Vornado and us (and certain of our subsidiaries) with regard to space that Sears leases at our Rego Park I property alleging that the defendants are liable for harm that Sears has suffered as a result of (a) water intrusions into the premises, (b) two fires in February 2014 that caused damages to those premises, and (c) alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act in the premises’ parking garage. Sears asserted various causes of actions for damages and sought to compel compliance with landlord’s obligations to repair the premises and to provide security, and to compel us to abate a nuisance that Sears claims was a cause of the water intrusions into its premises. In addition to injunctive relief, Sears sought, among other things, damages of not less than $4 million and future damages it estimated would not be less than $25 million. In March 2016, Sears withdrew its claim for future damages leaving a remaining claim for property damages, which we estimate to be approximately $650,000 based on information provided by Sears. We intend to defend the remaining claim vigorously. The amount or range of reasonable possible losses, if any, is not expected to be greater than $650,000. On April 4, 2017, Sears closed its store at the property.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
20

PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “ALX.” Set forth below are the high and low sales prices for the shares of our common stock for each full quarterly period within the two most recent years and any dividends paid per share during such periods.

|  | Year Ended December 31,
|  | 2017 |  | 2016
Quarter |  | High |  | Low |  | Dividends |  | High |  | Low |  | Dividends
First |  | $ | 441.54 |  |  | $ | 404.48 |  |  | $ | 4.25 |  |  | $ | 405.89 |  |  | $ | 350.03 |  |  | $ | 4.00 |
Second |  | 440.50 |  |  | 406.51 |  |  | 4.25 |  |  | 411.53 |  |  | 364.01 |  |  | 4.00 |
Third |  | 436.00 |  |  | 408.63 |  |  | 4.25 |  |  | 450.04 |  |  | 405.14 |  |  | 4.00 |
Fourth |  | 436.80 |  |  | 388.60 |  |  | 4.25 |  |  | 451.99 |  |  | 369.33 |  |  | 4.00 |

On January 17, 2018, we increased our regular quarterly dividend to $4.50 per share (a new indicated annual rate of $18.00 per share). As of January 31, 2018, there were approximately 232 holders of record of our common stock.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
During 2017, we did not sell any unregistered securities.
Information relating to compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance is set forth under Part III, Item 12 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and such information is incorporated by reference herein.
Recent Purchases of Equity Securities
During 2017, we did not repurchase any of our equity securities.
21

Performance Graph
The following graph is a comparison of the five-year cumulative return of our common stock, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (the “S&P 500 Index”) and the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts’ (“NAREIT”) All Equity Index, a peer group index. The graph assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 2012 in our common stock, the S&P 500 Index and the NAREIT All Equity Index and that all dividends were reinvested without the payment of any commissions. There can be no assurance that the performance of our stock will continue in line with the same or similar trends depicted in the graph below.

|  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2014 |  | 2015 |  | 2016 |  | 2017
Alexander’s |  | $ | 100 |  |  | $ | 103 |  |  | $ | 142 |  |  | $ | 129 |  |  | $ | 149 |  |  | $ | 144 |
S&P 500 Index |  | 100 |  |  | 132 |  |  | 151 |  |  | 153 |  |  | 171 |  |  | 208 |
The NAREIT All Equity Index |  | 100 |  |  | 103 |  |  | 132 |  |  | 135 |  |  | 147 |  |  | 160 |

22

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial and operating data. This data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This data may not be comparable to, or indicative of, future operating results.

|  | Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts) |  | 2017 |  | 2016 |  | 2015 |  | 2014 |  | 2013
Total revenues |  | $ | 230,574 |  |  | $ | 226,936 |  |  | $ | 207,915 |  |  | $ | 200,814 |  |  | $ | 196,459 |
Income from continuing operations |  | $ | 80,509 |  |  | $ | 86,477 |  |  | $ | 76,907 |  |  | $ | 67,396 |  |  | $ | 54,663 |
Income from discontinued operations |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 529 |  |  | 2,252 |
Net income |  | $ | 80,509 |  |  | $ | 86,477 |  |  | $ | 76,907 |  |  | $ | 67,925 |  |  | $ | 56,915 |
Income per common share: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Income from continuing operations - basic |  | $ | 15.74 |  |  | $ | 16.91 |  |  | $ | 15.04 |  |  | $ | 13.19 |  |  | $ | 10.70 |
Income from continuing operations - diluted |  | 15.74 |  |  | 16.91 |  |  | 15.04 |  |  | 13.19 |  |  | 10.70 |
Net income per common share - basic |  | 15.74 |  |  | 16.91 |  |  | 15.04 |  |  | 13.29 |  |  | 11.14 |
Net income per common share - diluted |  | 15.74 |  |  | 16.91 |  |  | 15.04 |  |  | 13.29 |  |  | 11.14 |
Dividends per common share |  | $ | 17.00 |  |  | $ | 16.00 |  |  | $ | 14.00 |  |  | $ | 13.00 |  |  | $ | 11.00 |
Balance sheet data: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Total assets |  | $ | 1,632,395 |  |  | $ | 1,451,230 |  |  | $ | 1,447,808 |  |  | $ | 1,418,392 |  |  | $ | 1,454,478 |
Real estate, at cost |  | 1,037,368 |  |  | 1,033,551 |  |  | 1,029,472 |  |  | 993,927 |  |  | 919,576 |
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |  | 283,044 |  |  | 252,737 |  |  | 225,533 |  |  | 210,025 |  |  | 185,375 |
Mortgages payable, net of deferred debt issuance costs |  | 1,240,222 |  |  | 1,052,359 |  |  | 1,053,262 |  |  | 1,027,956 |  |  | 1,046,713 |
Total equity |  | 343,955 |  |  | 352,845 |  |  | 352,880 |  |  | 348,399 |  |  | 333,581 |

23

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
Alexander’s, Inc. (NYSE: ALX) is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”), incorporated in Delaware, engaged in leasing, managing, developing and redeveloping its properties. All references to “we,” “us,” “our,” “Company” and “Alexander’s” refer to Alexander’s, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. We are managed by, and our properties are leased and developed by, Vornado Realty Trust (“Vornado”) (NYSE: VNO). We have seven properties in the greater New York City metropolitan area.
We compete with a large number of property owners and developers. Our success depends upon, among other factors, trends of the global, national and local economies, the financial condition and operating results of current and prospective tenants and customers, the availability and cost of capital, construction and renovation costs, taxes, governmental regulations, legislation, population and employment trends, zoning laws, and our ability to lease, sublease or sell our properties, at profitable levels. Our success is also subject to our ability to refinance existing debt on acceptable terms as it comes due.
Year Ended December 31, 2017 Financial Results Summary
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $80,509,000, or $15.74 per diluted share, compared to $86,477,000, or $16.91 per diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2016. Funds from operations (“FFO”) (non-GAAP) for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $114,908,000, or $22.46 per diluted share, compared to $119,780,000, or $23.42 per diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2016. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2017 included additional depreciation and amortization of tenant improvements and deferred leasing costs of $2,444,000, or $0.48 per diluted share, resulting from a tenant lease termination at our 731 Lexington Avenue property. Net income and FFO (non-GAAP) for the year ended December 31, 2016 included rental income of $2,257,000, or $0.44 per diluted share, resulting from a tenant lease termination at our Rego Park II property. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2016 also included additional depreciation and amortization of tenant improvements and deferred leasing costs of $1,077,000, or $0.21 per diluted share, related to the tenant lease termination at our Rego Park II property.
Quarter Ended December 31, 2017 Financial Results Summary
Net income for the quarter ended December 31, 2017 was $17,883,000, or $3.50 per diluted share, compared to $21,655,000, or $4.23 per diluted share for the quarter ended December 31, 2016. FFO (non-GAAP) for the quarter ended December 31, 2017 was $28,062,000, or $5.49 per diluted share, compared to $29,582,000, or $5.78 per diluted share for the quarter ended December 31, 2016. Net income for the quarter ended December 31, 2017 included additional depreciation and amortization of tenant improvements and deferred leasing costs of $2,184,000, or $0.43 per diluted share, resulting from a tenant lease termination at our 731 Lexington Avenue property.
Square Footage, Occupancy and Leasing Activity
As of December 31, 2017 our portfolio was comprised of seven properties aggregating 2,437,000 square feet. As of December 31, 2017, our properties had an occupancy rate of 99.3%.
Tenant Matters
On April 4, 2017, Sears closed its 195,000 square foot store at our Rego Park I property. Annual revenue from Sears is approximately $10,600,000, under a lease which expires in March 2021. In its 2016 annual report on Form 10-K, Sears indicated that substantial doubt exists related to its ability to continue as a going concern. There are $3,865,000 of receivables arising from the straight-lining of rent and $406,000 of unamortized deferred leasing costs on our consolidated balance sheet related to the Sears lease as of December 31, 2017 which we will continue to assess for recoverability.
On September 18, 2017, Toys, which leases 47,000 square feet of retail space at our Rego Park II shopping center ($2,600,000 of annual revenue) filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy relief. There are $694,000 of tenant improvements, $257,000 of unamortized deferred leasing costs and $544,000 of receivables arising from the straight-lining of rent on our consolidated balance sheet related to the Toys lease as of December 31, 2017.
24

Overview - continued
On September 19, 2017, the bankruptcy court approved the terms of an order stipulation between Le Cirque, a restaurant operator which leases 13,000 square feet at our 731 Lexington Avenue property (approximately $1,200,000 of annual revenue), and the Company which terminated the lease on January 5, 2018 (original lease expiration was May 2021). As a result, we began accelerating depreciation and amortization of approximately $2,780,000 of tenant improvements and deferred leasing costs over the new lease term, of which approximately $2,650,000 was recognized in the year ended December 31, 2017 and approximately $130,000 will be recognized in the quarter ending March 31, 2018.
Rego Park II Loan Participation
On July 28, 2017, we entered into a participation and servicing agreement with the lender on our Rego Park II shopping center loan, which matures on November 30, 2018. We invested $200,000,000 to participate in the loan and are entitled to interest at LIBOR plus 1.60% (3.17% as of December 31, 2017).
Financing
On June 1, 2017, we completed a $500,000,000 refinancing of the office portion of 731 Lexington Avenue. The interest-only loan is at LIBOR plus 0.90% (2.38% as of December 31, 2017) and matures in June 2020, with four one-year extension options. In connection therewith, we purchased an interest rate cap with a notional amount of $500,000,000 that caps LIBOR at a rate of 6.0%. The property was previously encumbered by a $300,000,000 interest-only mortgage at LIBOR plus 0.95% which was scheduled to mature in March 2021.
Significant Tenant
Bloomberg accounted for revenue of $105,224,000, $104,590,000 and $94,468,000 in the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, representing approximately 46%, 46% and 45% of our total revenues in each year, respectively. No other tenant accounted for more than 10% of our total revenues. If we were to lose Bloomberg as a tenant, or if Bloomberg were to be unable to fulfill its obligations under its lease, it would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. In order to assist us in our continuing assessment of Bloomberg’s creditworthiness, we receive certain confidential financial information and metrics from Bloomberg. In addition, we access and evaluate financial information regarding Bloomberg from other private sources, as well as publicly available data.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), which requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Set forth below is a summary of our accounting policies that we believe are critical to the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. This summary should be read in conjunction with a more complete discussion of our accounting policies included in Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Real Estate
Real estate is carried at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the carrying amount of our real estate, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization, was $754,324,000 and $780,814,000, respectively. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Depreciation requires an estimate by management of the useful life of each property and improvement as well as an allocation of the costs associated with a property to its various components. If we do not allocate these costs appropriately or incorrectly estimate the useful lives of our real estate, depreciation expense may be misstated. We capitalize all property operating expenses directly associated with and attributable to, the development and construction of a project, including interest expense. The capitalization period begins when development activities are underway and ends when it is determined that the asset is substantially complete and ready for its intended use, which is typically evidenced by the receipt of a temporary certificate of occupancy. General and administrative costs are expensed as incurred.
25

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates - continued
Our properties and related intangible assets, including properties to be developed in the future, are individually reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. An impairment exists when the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. Estimates of future cash flows are based on our current plans, intended holding periods and available market information at the time the analyses are prepared. For our development properties, estimates of future cash flows also include all future expenditures necessary to develop the asset, including interest payments that will be capitalized as part of the cost of the asset. An impairment loss is recognized only if the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable and is measured based on the excess of the property’s carrying amount over its estimated fair value. If our estimates of future cash flows, anticipated holding periods, or fair values change, based on market conditions or otherwise, our evaluation of impairment charges may be different and such differences could be material to our consolidated financial statements. Estimates of future cash flows are subjective and are based, in part, on assumptions regarding future occupancy, rental rates and capital requirements that could differ materially from actual results. Plans to hold properties over longer periods decrease the likelihood of recording impairment losses.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We periodically evaluate the collectibility of amounts due from tenants, including the receivable arising from the straight-lining of rents, and maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts ($1,501,000 and $1,473,000 as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively) for estimated losses resulting from the inability of tenants to make required payments under the lease agreements. We exercise judgment in establishing these allowances and consider payment history and current credit status in developing these estimates. These estimates may differ from actual results, which could be material to our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
We have the following revenue sources and revenue recognition policies:

• | Base Rent – revenue arising from tenant leases. These rents are recognized over the non-cancelable term of the related leases on a straight-line basis, which includes the effects of rent steps and free rent abatements under the leases. We commence rental revenue recognition when the tenant takes possession of the leased space and the leased space is substantially ready for its intended use. In addition, in circumstances where we provide a tenant improvement allowance for improvements that are owned by the tenant, we recognize the allowance as a reduction of rental revenue on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease;

• | Percentage Rent – revenue arising from retail tenant leases that is contingent upon the sales of tenants exceeding defined thresholds. These rents are recognized only after the contingency has been removed (i.e., when tenant sales thresholds have been achieved);

• | Expense Reimbursements – revenue arising from tenant leases which provide for the recovery of all or a portion of the operating expenses and real estate taxes of the respective properties. This revenue is recognized in the same periods as the expenses are incurred;

• | Parking income – revenue arising from the rental of parking space at our properties. This income is recognized as the service is provided.

Before we recognize revenue, we assess, among other things, its collectibility. If our assessment of the collectibility of revenue changes, the impact on our consolidated financial statements could be material.
Income Taxes
We operate in a manner intended to enable us to continue to qualify as a REIT under Sections 856 – 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT under the Code, we must distribute at least 90% of our taxable income to stockholders each year. We distribute to our stockholders 100% of our taxable income and therefore, no provision for Federal income taxes is required. If we fail to distribute the required amount of income to our stockholders, or fail to meet other REIT requirements, we may fail to qualify as a REIT, which may result in substantial adverse tax consequences.
26

Results of Operations – Year Ended December 31, 2017 compared to December 31, 2016
Property Rentals
Property rentals were $152,857,000 in the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $151,444,000 in the prior year, an increase of $1,413,000. This increase was primarily due to higher rental income of $3,730,000 from The Alexander apartment tower, which was placed in service in phases beginning July 2015 and leased up to stabilization in September 2016, partially offset by income of $2,257,000 in 2016 resulting from a tenant lease termination at our Rego Park II property.
Expense Reimbursements
Tenant expense reimbursements were $77,717,000 in the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $75,492,000 in the prior year, an increase of $2,225,000. This increase was primarily due to higher reimbursable real estate taxes and higher reimbursable operating expenses.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses were $85,127,000 in the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $82,232,000 in the prior year, an increase of $2,895,000. This increase was primarily due to (i) higher real estate taxes of $3,267,000 and (ii) higher reimbursable operating expenses of $903,000, partially offset by (iii) lower marketing costs for The Alexander apartment tower of $1,098,000 and (iv) lower bad debt expense of $504,000.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization was $34,925,000 in the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $33,807,000 in the prior year, an increase of $1,118,000. This increase was primarily due to additional depreciation and amortization of tenant improvements and deferred leasing costs of $2,444,000 related to a tenant lease termination at our 731 Lexington Avenue property in September 2017, partially offset by additional depreciation and amortization of tenant improvements and deferred leasing costs of $1,077,000 in 2016 related to a tenant lease termination at our Rego Park II property.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses were $5,252,000 in the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $5,436,000 in the prior year, a decrease of $184,000. This decrease was primarily due to lower director’s fees and stock-based compensation expense as a result of having one less member on our Board of Directors in 2017.
Interest and Other Income, net
Interest and other income, net was $6,716,000 in the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $3,305,000 in the prior year, an increase of $3,411,000. This increase was primarily due to higher interest income of (i) $2,453,000 from the Rego Park II loan participation, (ii) $1,418,000 from an increase in the average interest rates and (iii) $216,000 from an increase in the average investment balances, partially offset by (iv) lower income of $429,000 in connection with bankruptcy recoveries and (v) income of $367,000 in the prior year from a cost reimbursement settlement with a retail tenant at our 731 Lexington Avenue property.
Interest and Debt Expense
Interest and debt expense was $31,474,000 in the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $22,241,000 in the prior year, an increase of $9,233,000. This increase was primarily due to higher interest expense of (i) $5,289,000 due to an increase in average LIBOR, (ii) $2,658,000 resulting from the refinancing of the office portion of 731 Lexington Avenue on June 1, 2017 for $500,000,000 at LIBOR plus 0.90% (previously a $300,000,000 loan at LIBOR plus 0.95%) and (iii) $1,188,000 of higher amortization of debt issuance costs.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense was $3,000 in the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $48,000 in the prior year.
27

Results of Operations – Year Ended December 31, 2016 compared to December 31, 2015
Property Rentals
Property rentals were $151,444,000 in the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to $138,688,000 in the prior year, an increase of $12,756,000. This increase was primarily due to (i) rental income of $7,271,000 from The Alexander apartment tower, which was placed in service in phases beginning July 2015 and leased up to stabilization in September 2016, (ii) higher rental income of $3,366,000 from the January 2016 lease amendment with Bloomberg at 731 Lexington Avenue and (iii) income of $2,257,000 resulting from a tenant lease termination at our Rego Park II property in June 2016.
Expense Reimbursements
Tenant expense reimbursements were $75,492,000 in the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to $69,227,000 in the prior year, an increase of $6,265,000. This increase was primarily due to (i) higher recoveries of real estate taxes and operating expenses from Bloomberg at 731 Lexington Avenue as a result of the January 2016 lease amendment, which converted 192,000 square feet from a gross basis to a net rent basis and (ii) higher reimbursable real estate taxes, partially offset by (iii) lower reimbursable operating expenses.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses were $82,232,000 in the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to $76,218,000 in the prior year, an increase of $6,014,000. This increase was primarily due to (i) higher operating expenses of $2,494,000 related to The Alexander apartment tower, which was placed in service in phases beginning July 2015 and leased up to stabilization in September 2016, (ii) higher reimbursable real estate taxes of $3,703,000 and (iii) higher bad debt expense of $871,000, partially offset by (iv) lower reimbursable operating expenses of $1,068,000.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization was $33,807,000 in the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to $31,086,000 in the prior year, an increase of $2,721,000. This increase was primarily due to additional depreciation related to The Alexander apartment tower, which was placed in service in phases beginning July 2015.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses were $5,436,000 in the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to $5,406,000 in the prior year, an increase of $30,000.
Interest and Other Income, net
Interest and other income, net was $3,305,000 in the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to $5,949,000 in the prior year, a decrease of $2,644,000. This decrease was primarily due to $2,141,000 from a special dividend from our investment in common shares of Macerich in 2015 and lower income of $1,275,000 in connection with bankruptcy recoveries.
Interest and Debt Expense
Interest and debt expense was $22,241,000 in the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to $24,239,000 in the prior year, a decrease of $1,998,000. This decrease was primarily due to savings of $5,631,000 resulting from the refinancing of the retail portion of 731 Lexington Avenue on August 5, 2015 at LIBOR plus 1.40%, or 2.05% as of December 31, 2016 (the prior loan had a fixed rate of 4.93%); partially offset by lower capitalized interest of $1,486,000 as a result of completing the development of The Alexander apartment tower, which was placed in service in phases beginning July 2015 and $2,066,000 due to an increase in average LIBOR.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense was $48,000 in the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to $8,000 in the prior year.
28

Related Party Transactions
Vornado
Steven Roth is the Chairman of our Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer, the Managing General Partner of Interstate Properties (“Interstate”), a New Jersey general partnership, and the Chairman of the Board of Trustees and Chief Executive Officer of Vornado. As of December 31, 2017, Mr. Roth, Interstate and its other two general partners, David Mandelbaum and Russell B. Wight, Jr. (who are also directors of the Company and trustees of Vornado) owned, in the aggregate, 26.2% of our outstanding common stock, in addition to the 2.3% they indirectly own through Vornado. Joseph Macnow, our Treasurer, is the Executive Vice President - Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer of Vornado. Matthew Iocco, our Chief Financial Officer, is the Executive Vice President - Chief Accounting Officer of Vornado.
As of December 31, 2017, Vornado owned 32.4% of our outstanding common stock. We are managed by, and our properties are leased and developed by, Vornado, pursuant to various agreements, which expire in March of each year and are automatically renewable. These agreements are described in Note 4 – Related Party Transactions, to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Toys
Our affiliate, Vornado, owns 32.5% of Toys. Joseph Macnow, Vornado’s Executive Vice President - Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer and Wendy A. Silverstein, a member of our Board of Directors, represent Vornado as members of Toys’ Board of Directors. Toys leases 47,000 square feet of retail space at our Rego Park II shopping center ($2,600,000 of annual revenue). On September 18, 2017, Toys filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy relief. There are $694,000 of tenant improvements, $257,000 of unamortized deferred leasing costs and $544,000 of receivables arising from the straight-lining of rent on our consolidated balance sheet related to the Toys lease as of December 31, 2017.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Property rental income is our primary source of cash flow and is dependent on a number of factors including the occupancy level and rental rates of our properties, as well as our tenants’ ability to pay their rents. Our properties provide us with a relatively consistent stream of cash flow that enables us to pay our operating expenses, interest expense, recurring capital expenditures and cash dividends to stockholders. Other sources of liquidity to fund cash requirements include our existing cash, proceeds from financings, including mortgage or construction loans secured by our properties and proceeds from asset sales. We anticipate that cash flows from continuing operations over the next twelve months, together with existing cash balances, will be adequate to fund our business operations, cash dividends to stockholders, debt amortization and capital expenditures.
Dividends
On January 17, 2018, we increased our regular quarterly dividend to $4.50 per share (a new indicated annual rate of $18.00 per share). The new dividend, when declared by the Board of Directors for all of 2018, will require us to pay out approximately $92,100,000.
Rego Park II Loan Participation
On July 28, 2017, we entered into a participation and servicing agreement with the lender on our Rego Park II shopping center loan, which matures on November 30, 2018. We invested $200,000,000 to participate in the loan and are entitled to interest at LIBOR plus 1.60% (3.17% as of December 31, 2017).
Financing Activities and Contractual Obligations
On June 1, 2017, we completed a $500,000,000 refinancing of the office portion of 731 Lexington Avenue. The interest-only loan is at LIBOR plus 0.90% and matures in June 2020, with four one-year extension options. In connection therewith, we purchased an interest rate cap with a notional amount of $500,000,000 that caps LIBOR at a rate of 6.0%. The property was previously encumbered by a $300,000,000 interest-only mortgage at LIBOR plus 0.95% which was scheduled to mature in March 2021.
29

Liquidity and Capital Resources - continued
Below is a summary of our outstanding debt and maturities as of December 31, 2017. We may refinance our maturing debt as it comes due or choose to repay it.

|  | Balance |  | Interest Rate |  | Maturity (1)
(Amounts in thousands) |  |  |
Rego Park I shopping center (100% cash collateralized) |  | $ | 78,246 |  |  | 0.35 | % |  | Mar. 2018
Paramus |  | 68,000 |  |  | 2.90 | % |  | Oct. 2018
Rego Park II shopping center(2) |  | 256,194 |  |  | 3.42 | % |  | Nov. 2018
731 Lexington Avenue, retail space(3) |  | 350,000 |  |  | 2.78 | % |  | Aug. 2022
731 Lexington Avenue, office space(4) |  | 500,000 |  |  | 2.38 | % |  | Jun. 2024
Total |  | 1,252,440 |  |  |  |  |
Deferred debt issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization of $6,315 |  | (12,218 | ) |  |  |  |
Total, net |  | $ | 1,240,222 |  |  |  |  |
(1) Represents the extended maturity where we have the unilateral right to extend.
(2) This loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.85%. See page 29 for details of our Rego Park II loan participation.
(3) This loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.40%.
(4) This loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 0.90%.

Below is a summary of our contractual obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2017.

|  |  |  |  |  | Less than |  | One to |  | Three to |  | More than
(Amounts in thousands) |  | Total |  | One Year |  | Three Years |  | Five Years |  | Five Years
Contractual obligations (principal and interest)(1): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Long-term debt obligations |  | $ | 1,385,231 |  |  | $ | 433,997 |  |  | $ | 43,921 |  |  | $ | 389,861 |  |  | $ | 517,452 |
|  | Operating lease obligations |  | 7,267 |  |  | 800 |  |  | 1,600 |  |  | 1,600 |  |  | 3,267 |
|  |  |  | $ | 1,392,498 |  |  | $ | 434,797 |  |  | $ | 45,521 |  |  | $ | 391,461 |  |  | $ | 520,719 |
Commitments: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Standby letters of credit |  | $ | 1,474 |  |  | $ | 1,474 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |
(1) |  | Interest on variable rate debt is computed using rates in effect as of December 31, 2017.

Commitments and Contingencies
Insurance
We maintain general liability insurance with limits of $300,000,000 per occurrence and per property, and all-risk property and rental value insurance coverage with limits of $1.7 billion per occurrence, including coverage for acts of terrorism, with sub-limits for certain perils such as floods and earthquakes on each of our properties.
Fifty Ninth Street Insurance Company, LLC (“FNSIC”), our wholly owned consolidated subsidiary, acts as a direct insurer for coverage for acts of terrorism, including nuclear, biological, chemical and radiological (“NBCR”) acts, as defined by the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act, which expires in December 2020. Coverage for acts of terrorism (including NBCR acts) is up to $1.7 billion per occurrence and in the aggregate. Coverage for acts of terrorism (excluding NBCR acts) is fully reinsured by third party insurance companies and the Federal government with no exposure to FNSIC. For NBCR acts, FNSIC is responsible for a $293,000 deductible ($306,000 effective January 1, 2018) and 17% of the balance (18% effective January 1, 2018) of a covered loss, and the Federal government is responsible for the remaining 83% (82% effective January 1, 2018) of a covered loss. We are ultimately responsible for any loss incurred by FNSIC.
30

Liquidity and Capital Resources - continued
We continue to monitor the state of the insurance market and the scope and costs of coverage for acts of terrorism. However, we cannot anticipate what coverage will be available on commercially reasonable terms in the future. We are responsible for deductibles and losses in excess of our insurance coverage, which could be material.
Our mortgage loans are non-recourse to us and contain customary covenants requiring us to maintain insurance. Although we believe that we have adequate insurance coverage for purposes of these agreements, we may not be able to obtain an equivalent amount of coverage at reasonable costs in the future. Further, if lenders insist on greater coverage than we are able to obtain, it could adversely affect our ability to finance our properties.
Rego Park I Litigation
In June 2014, Sears filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court of the State of New York against Vornado and us (and certain of our subsidiaries) with regard to space that Sears leases at our Rego Park I property alleging that the defendants are liable for harm that Sears has suffered as a result of (a) water intrusions into the premises, (b) two fires in February 2014 that caused damages to those premises, and (c) alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act in the premises’ parking garage. Sears asserted various causes of actions for damages and sought to compel compliance with landlord’s obligations to repair the premises and to provide security, and to compel us to abate a nuisance that Sears claims was a cause of the water intrusions into its premises. In addition to injunctive relief, Sears sought, among other things, damages of not less than $4 million and future damages it estimated would not be less than $25 million. In March 2016, Sears withdrew its claim for future damages leaving a remaining claim for property damages, which we estimate to be approximately $650,000 based on information provided by Sears. We intend to defend the remaining claim vigorously. The amount or range of reasonable possible losses, if any, is not expected to be greater than $650,000.
Paramus
In 2001, we leased 30.3 acres of land located in Paramus, New Jersey to IKEA Property, Inc. The lease has a purchase option in 2021 for $75,000,000. The property is encumbered by a $68,000,000 interest-only mortgage loan with a fixed rate of 2.90%, which matures on October 5, 2018. The annual triple-net rent is the sum of $700,000 plus the amount of debt service on the mortgage loan. If the purchase option is exercised, we will receive net cash proceeds of approximately $7,000,000 and recognize a gain on sale of land of approximately $60,000,000. If the purchase option is not exercised, the triple-net rent for the last 20 years would include debt service sufficient to fully amortize $68,000,000 over the remaining 20-year lease term.
Letters of Credit
Approximately $1,474,000 of standby letters of credit were outstanding as of December 31, 2017.
Other
In October 2015, the New York City Department of Finance (“NYC DOF”) issued a Notice of Determination to us assessing an additional $22,910,000 of transfer taxes (including interest and penalties as of December 31, 2017) in connection with the sale of Kings Plaza Regional Shopping Center in November 2012. We believe that the NYC DOF’s claim is without merit and intend to vigorously contest this assessment. We have determined that the likelihood of a loss related to this issue is not probable and, after consultation with legal counsel, that the outcome of this assessment is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
We received approximately $396,000, $825,000 and $2,100,000 from bankruptcy recoveries during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which is included as “interest and other income, net” in our consolidated statements of income.
There are various other legal actions against us in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, the outcome of such matters in the aggregate will not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
31

Liquidity and Capital Resources - continued
Cash Flows for the Year Ended December 31, 2017
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash were $393,279,000 at December 31, 2017, compared to $374,678,000 at December 31, 2016, an increase of $18,601,000. This increase resulted from (i) $123,426,000 of net cash provided by operating activities, and (ii) $97,146,000 of net cash provided by financing activities, partially offset by (iii) $201,971,000 of net cash used in investing activities.
Net cash provided by operating activities of $123,426,000 was comprised of net income of $80,509,000 and adjustments for non-cash items of $43,372,000, partially offset by the net change in operating assets and liabilities of $455,000. The adjustments for non-cash items were primarily comprised of depreciation and amortization (including amortization of debt issuance costs) of $38,681,000 and straight-lining of rental income of $4,297,000.
Net cash provided by financing activities of $97,146,000 was primarily comprised of (i) $500,000,000 of proceeds from the refinancing of the office portion of 731 Lexington Avenue, partially offset by (ii) debt repayments of $303,707,000 (primarily the repayment of the former loan on the office portion of 731 Lexington Avenue) and (iii) dividends paid of $86,961,000.
Net cash used in investing activities of $201,971,000 was primarily comprised of the Rego Park II loan participation payment of $200,000,000 and construction in progress and real estate additions of $3,434,000.
Cash Flows for the Year Ended December 31, 2016
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash were $374,678,000 at December 31, 2016, compared to $344,656,000 at December 31, 2015, an increase of $30,022,000. This increase resulted from (i) $130,820,000 of net cash provided by operating activities, partially offset by (ii) $85,292,000 of net cash used in financing activities and (iii) $15,506,000 of net cash used in investing activities.
Net cash provided by operating activities of $130,820,000 was comprised of net income of $86,477,000, adjustments for non-cash items of $39,171,000, and the net change in operating assets and liabilities of $5,172,000. The adjustments for non-cash items were primarily comprised of depreciation and amortization (including amortization of debt issuance costs) of $36,374,000 and straight-lining of rental income of $2,347,000.
Net cash used in financing activities of $85,292,000 was primarily comprised of dividends paid of $81,822,000.
Net cash used in investing activities of $15,506,000 was comprised of construction in progress and real estate additions of $15,506,000 (primarily related to The Alexander apartment tower), including the payment of a development fee to Vornado of $5,784,000.
Cash Flows for the Year Ended December 31, 2015
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash were $344,656,000 at December 31, 2015, compared to $312,417,000 at December 31, 2014, an increase of $32,239,000. This increase resulted from (i) $106,201,000 of net cash provided by operating activities, partially offset by (ii) $48,839,000 of net cash used in financing activities and (iii) $25,123,000 of net cash used in investing activities.
Net cash provided by operating activities of $106,201,000 was comprised of net income of $76,907,000 and adjustments for non-cash items of $32,853,000, partially offset by the net change in operating assets and liabilities of $3,559,000. The adjustments for non-cash items were primarily comprised of depreciation and amortization of $33,671,000, partially offset by straight-lining of rental income of $1,418,000.
Net cash used in financing activities of $48,839,000 was primarily comprised of (i) debt repayments of $323,193,000 (primarily repayment of the prior loan on the retail portion of 731 Lexington Avenue) and (ii) dividends paid of $71,571,000, partially offset by (iii) $350,000,000 of proceeds from the refinancing of the retail portion of 731 Lexington Avenue in August 2015.
Net cash used in investing activities of $25,123,000 was comprised of construction in progress and real estate additions of $50,121,000 (primarily related to The Alexander apartment tower) partially offset by proceeds of $24,998,000 from short-term investments that matured during the second quarter of 2015.
32

Funds from Operations (“FFO”) (non-GAAP)
FFO is computed in accordance with the definition adopted by the Board of Governors of NAREIT. NAREIT defines FFO as GAAP net income or loss adjusted to exclude net gains from sales of depreciated real estate assets, real estate impairment losses, depreciation and amortization expense from real estate assets and other specified non-cash items, including the pro rata share of such adjustments of unconsolidated subsidiaries. FFO and FFO per diluted share are used by management, investors and analysts to facilitate meaningful comparisons of operating performance between periods and among our peers because it excludes the effect of real estate depreciation and amortization and net gains on sales, which are based on historical costs and implicitly assume that the value of real estate diminishes predictably over time, rather than fluctuating based on existing market conditions. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities and is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash requirements and should not be considered as an alternative to net income as a performance measure or cash flow as a liquidity measure. FFO may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies.
The following table reconciles our net income to FFO (non-GAAP):

|  | For the Year Ended |  | For the Three Months Ended
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts) |  | December 31, |  | December 31,
|  | 2017 |  | 2016 |  | 2017 |  | 2016
Net income |  | $ | 80,509 |  |  | $ | 86,477 |  |  | $ | 17,883 |  |  | $ | 21,655 |
Depreciation and amortization of real property |  | 34,399 |  |  | 33,303 |  |  | 10,179 |  |  | 7,927 |
FFO (non-GAAP) |  | $ | 114,908 |  |  | $ | 119,780 |  |  | $ | 28,062 |  |  | $ | 29,582 |
FFO per diluted share (non-GAAP) |  | $ | 22.46 |  |  | $ | 23.42 |  |  | $ | 5.49 |  |  | $ | 5.78 |
Weighted average shares used in computing FFO per diluted share |  | 5,115,501 |  |  | 5,114,084 |  |  | 5,115,982 |  |  | 5,114,701 |

33

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We have exposure to fluctuations in interest rates, which are sensitive to many factors that are beyond our control. Our exposure to a change in interest rates is summarized in the table below.

|  | 2017 |  | 2016
|  | December 31, Balance |  | Weighted Average Interest Rate |  | Effect of 1% Change in Base Rates |  | December 31, Balance |  | Weighted Average Interest Rate
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts) |  |  |  |  |
Variable rate |  | $ | 1,106,194 |  |  | 2.75% |  | $ | 11,062 |  |  | $ | 909,901 |  |  | 2.08%
Fixed rate |  | 146,246 |  |  | 1.54% |  | — |  |  | 146,246 |  |  | 1.54%
|  | $ | 1,252,440 |  |  | 2.61% |  | $ | 11,062 |  |  | $ | 1,056,147 |  |  | 2.01%
Total effect on diluted earnings per share |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 2.16 |  |  |  |  |

As of December 31, 2017 we had an interest rate cap with a notional amount of $500,000,000 that caps LIBOR at a rate of 6.0%.
Fair Value of Debt
The fair value of our consolidated debt is calculated by discounting the future contractual cash flows of these instruments using current risk-adjusted rates available to borrowers with similar credit ratings, which are provided by a third-party specialist. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the estimated fair value of our consolidated debt was $1,239,000,000 and $1,045,000,000, respectively. Our fair value estimates, which are made at the end of the reporting period, may be different from the amounts that may ultimately be realized upon the disposition of our financial instruments.
34

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

| Index to Consolidated Financial Statements | Page Number
| Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | 36
| Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 | 37
| Consolidated Statements of Income for the |
| Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 | 38
| Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the |
| Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 | 39
| Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the |
| Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 | 40
| Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the |
| Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 | 41
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | 42

35

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of
Alexander’s, Inc.
Paramus, New Jersey
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Alexander’s, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes and the schedules listed in the Index at Item 15 (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 12, 2018, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
February 12, 2018
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1969.
36

ALEXANDER’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
| December 31,
ASSETS | 2017 |  | 2016
Real estate, at cost: |  |  |  |
Land | $ | 44,971 |  |  | $ | 44,971 |
Buildings and leasehold improvements | 988,846 |  |  | 985,800 |
Development and construction in progress | 3,551 |  |  | 2,780 |
Total | 1,037,368 |  |  | 1,033,551 |
Accumulated depreciation and amortization | (283,044 | ) |  | (252,737 | )
Real estate, net | 754,324 |  |  | 780,814 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 307,536 |  |  | 288,926 |
Restricted cash | 85,743 |  |  | 85,752 |
Rego Park II loan participation | 198,537 |  |  | — |
Marketable securities | 35,156 |  |  | 37,918 |
Tenant and other receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,501 and $1,473, respectively | 2,693 |  |  | 3,056 |
Receivable arising from the straight-lining of rents | 174,713 |  |  | 179,010 |
Deferred lease and other property costs, net, including unamortized leasing fees to Vornado of |  |  |
$35,152 and $36,960, respectively | 45,790 |  |  | 48,387 |
Other assets | 27,903 |  |  | 27,367 |
| $ | 1,632,395 |  |  | $ | 1,451,230 |
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |  |  |
Mortgages payable, net of deferred debt issuance costs | $ | 1,240,222 |  |  | $ | 1,052,359 |
Amounts due to Vornado | 2,490 |  |  | 897 |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 42,827 |  |  | 42,200 |
Other liabilities | 2,901 |  |  | 2,929 |
Total liabilities | 1,288,440 |  |  | 1,098,385 |
Commitments and contingencies |  |  |  |  |
Preferred stock: $1.00 par value per share; authorized, 3,000,000 shares; |  |  |
issued and outstanding, none | — |  |  | — |
Common stock: $1.00 par value per share; authorized, 10,000,000 shares; issued, 5,173,450 shares; |  |  |
outstanding, 5,107,290 and 5,106,196 shares, respectively | 5,173 |  |  | 5,173 |
Additional capital | 31,577 |  |  | 31,189 |
Retained earnings | 302,543 |  |  | 308,995 |
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 5,030 |  |  | 7,862 |
| 344,323 |  |  | 353,219 |
Treasury stock: 66,160 and 67,254 shares, respectively, at cost | (368 | ) |  | (374 | )
Total equity | 343,955 |  |  | 352,845 |
| $ | 1,632,395 |  |  | $ | 1,451,230 |

See notes to consolidated financial statements.
37

ALEXANDER’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
| Year Ended December 31,
| 2017 |  | 2016 |  | 2015
REVENUES |  |  |  |  |  |
Property rentals | $ | 152,857 |  |  | $ | 151,444 |  |  | $ | 138,688 |
Expense reimbursements | 77,717 |  |  | 75,492 |  |  | 69,227 |
Total revenues | 230,574 |  |  | 226,936 |  |  | 207,915 |
EXPENSES |  |  |  |  |
Operating, including fees to Vornado of $4,671, $4,590, and $4,476, respectively | 85,127 |  |  | 82,232 |  |  | 76,218 |
Depreciation and amortization | 34,925 |  |  | 33,807 |  |  | 31,086 |
General and administrative, including management fees to Vornado of $2,380 |  |  |  |  |
in each year | 5,252 |  |  | 5,436 |  |  | 5,406 |
Total expenses | 125,304 |  |  | 121,475 |  |  | 112,710 |
OPERATING INCOME | 105,270 |  |  | 105,461 |  |  | 95,205 |
Interest and other income, net | 6,716 |  |  | 3,305 |  |  | 5,949 |
Interest and debt expense | (31,474 | ) |  | (22,241 | ) |  | (24,239 | )
Income before income taxes | 80,512 |  |  | 86,525 |  |  | 76,915 |
Income tax expense | (3 | ) |  | (48 | ) |  | (8 | )
Net income | $ | 80,509 |  |  | $ | 86,477 |  |  | $ | 76,907 |
Net income per common share - basic and diluted | $ | 15.74 |  |  | $ | 16.91 |  |  | $ | 15.04 |
Weighted average shares outstanding- basic and diluted | 5,115,501 |  |  | 5,114,084 |  |  | 5,112,352 |

See notes to consolidated financial statements.
38

ALEXANDER’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Amounts in thousands)
| Year Ended December 31,
| 2017 |  | 2016 |  | 2015
Net income | $ | 80,509 |  |  | $ | 86,477 |  |  | $ | 76,907 |
Other comprehensive (loss) income: |  |  |  |  |
Change in unrealized net gain on available-for-sale securities | (2,762 | ) |  | (5,273 | ) |  | (1,455 | )
Change in value of interest rate cap | (70 | ) |  | 133 |  |  | — |
Comprehensive income | $ | 77,677 |  |  | $ | 81,337 |  |  | $ | 75,452 |

See notes to consolidated financial statements.
39

ALEXANDER’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(Amounts in thousands)
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |  |  |  |
| Common Stock |  | Additional Capital |  | Retained Earnings |  |  | Treasury Stock |  | Total Equity
| Shares |  | Amount |  |  |  |  |
Balance, December 31, 2014 | 5,173 |  |  | $ | 5,173 |  |  | $ | 30,139 |  |  | $ | 299,004 |  |  | $ | 14,457 |  |  | $ | (374 | ) |  | $ | 348,399 |
Net income | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 76,907 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 76,907 |
Dividends paid | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (71,571 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (71,571 | )
Change in unrealized net gain |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
on available-for-sale securities | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (1,455 | ) |  | — |  |  | (1,455 | )
Deferred stock unit grant | — |  |  | — |  |  | 600 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 600 |
Balance, December 31, 2015 | 5,173 |  |  | 5,173 |  |  | 30,739 |  |  | 304,340 |  |  | 13,002 |  |  | (374 | ) |  | 352,880 |
Net income | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 86,477 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 86,477 |
Dividends paid | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (81,822 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (81,822 | )
Change in unrealized net gain |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
on available-for-sale securities | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (5,273 | ) |  | — |  |  | (5,273 | )
Change in value of interest rate cap | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 133 |  |  |  |  | 133 |
Deferred stock unit grant | — |  |  | — |  |  | 450 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 450 |
Balance, December 31, 2016 | 5,173 |  |  | 5,173 |  |  | 31,189 |  |  | 308,995 |  |  | 7,862 |  |  | (374 | ) |  | 352,845 |
Net income | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 80,509 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 80,509 |
Dividends paid | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (86,961 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (86,961 | )
Change in unrealized net gain |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
on available-for-sale securities | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (2,762 | ) |  | — |  |  | (2,762 | )
Change in value of interest rate cap | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (70 | ) |  | — |  |  | (70 | )
Deferred stock unit grant | — |  |  | — |  |  | 394 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 394 |
Other | — |  |  | — |  |  | (6 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 6 |  |  | — |
Balance, December 31, 2017 | 5,173 |  |  | $ | 5,173 |  |  | $ | 31,577 |  |  | $ | 302,543 |  |  | $ | 5,030 |  |  | $ | (368 | ) |  | $ | 343,955 |

See notes to consolidated financial statements.
40

ALEXANDER’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in thousands)
| Year Ended December 31,
| 2017 |  | 2016 |  | 2015
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |  |  |  |  |  |
Net income | $ | 80,509 |  |  | $ | 86,477 |  |  | $ | 76,907 |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |  |  |  |  |
Depreciation and amortization, including amortization of debt issuance costs | 38,681 |  |  | 36,374 |  |  | 33,671 |
Straight-lining of rental income | 4,297 |  |  | 2,347 |  |  | (1,418 | )
Stock-based compensation expense | 394 |  |  | 450 |  |  | 600 |
Change in operating assets and liabilities: |  |  |  |  |
Tenant and other receivables, net | 363 |  |  | 958 |  |  | (1,801 | )
Other assets | (2,627 | ) |  | (9,894 | ) |  | (4,777 | )
Amounts due to Vornado | 1,626 |  |  | (1,913 | ) |  | 2,228 |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 211 |  |  | 16,049 |  |  | 822 |
Other liabilities | (28 | ) |  | (28 | ) |  | (31 | )
Net cash provided by operating activities | 123,426 |  |  | 130,820 |  |  | 106,201 |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |  |  |  |  |
Construction in progress and real estate additions | (3,434 | ) |  | (15,506 | ) |  | (50,121 | )
Rego Park II loan participation payment | (200,000 | ) |  | — |  |  | — |
Proceeds from maturing short-term investments | — |  |  | — |  |  | 24,998 |
Principal repayment proceeds from Rego Park II loan participation | 1,463 |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Net cash used in investing activities | (201,971 | ) |  | (15,506 | ) |  | (25,123 | )
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |  |  |  |  |
Debt repayments | (303,707 | ) |  | (3,440 | ) |  | (323,193 | )
Proceeds from borrowing | 500,000 |  |  | — |  |  | 350,000 |
Dividends paid | (86,961 | ) |  | (81,822 | ) |  | (71,571 | )
Debt issuance costs | (12,186 | ) |  | (30 | ) |  | (4,075 | )
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 97,146 |  |  | (85,292 | ) |  | (48,839 | )
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash | 18,601 |  |  | 30,022 |  |  | 32,239 |
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year | 374,678 |  |  | 344,656 |  |  | 312,417 |
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year | $ | 393,279 |  |  | $ | 374,678 |  |  | $ | 344,656 |
RECONCILIATION OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH |  |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 288,926 |  |  | 259,349 |  |  | 227,815 |
Restricted cash at beginning of year | 85,752 |  |  | 85,307 |  |  | 84,602 |
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year | 374,678 |  |  | 344,656 |  |  | 312,417 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | 307,536 |  |  | 288,926 |  |  | 259,349 |
Restricted cash at end of year | 85,743 |  |  | 85,752 |  |  | 85,307 |
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year | 393,279 |  |  | 374,678 |  |  | 344,656 |
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION |  |  |  |  |
Cash payments for interest, excluding capitalized interest of $1,486 in 2015 | $ | 26,994 |  |  | $ | 19,517 |  |  | $ | 22,354 |
NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS |  |  |  |  |
Liability for real estate additions, including $21, $54 and $5,795 due to Vornado |  |  |  |  |
in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively | $ | 705 |  |  | $ | 322 |  |  | $ | 10,139 |
Write-off of fully amortized and/or depreciated assets | 4,265 |  |  | 1,691 |  |  | 20,786 |
Change in unrealized net gain on available-for-sale securities | (2,762 | ) |  | (5,273 | ) |  | (1,455 | )

See notes to consolidated financial statements.
41

ALEXANDER’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ORGANIZATION
Alexander’s, Inc. (NYSE: ALX) is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”), incorporated in Delaware, engaged in leasing, managing, developing and redeveloping its properties. All references to “we,” “us,” “our,” “Company” and “Alexander’s” refer to Alexander’s, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. We are managed by, and our properties are leased and developed by, Vornado Realty Trust (“Vornado”) (NYSE: VNO).
We have seven properties in the greater New York City metropolitan area consisting of:
Operating properties

• | 731 Lexington Avenue, a 1,311,000 square foot multi-use building, comprising the entire block bounded by Lexington Avenue, East 59 th Street, Third Avenue and East 58 th Street in Manhattan. The building contains 889,000 and 174,000 of net rentable square feet of office and retail space, respectively, which we own, and 248,000 square feet of residential space consisting of 105 condominium units, which we sold. Bloomberg L.P. (“Bloomberg”) occupies all of the office space. The Home Depot (83,000 square feet), The Container Store (34,000 square feet) and Hennes & Mauritz (27,000 square feet) are the principal retail tenants;

• | Rego Park I, a 343,000 square foot shopping center, located on Queens Boulevard and 63 rd Road in Queens. The center is anchored by a 195,000 square foot Sears department store, a 50,000 square foot Burlington, a 46,000 square foot Bed Bath & Beyond and a 36,000 square foot Marshalls. On April 4, 2017, Sears closed its store at the property. Annual revenue from Sears is approximately $10,600,000, under a lease which expires in March 2021. In its 2016 annual report on Form 10-K, Sears indicated that substantial doubt exists related to its ability to continue as a going concern;

• | Rego Park II, a 609,000 square foot shopping center, adjacent to the Rego Park I shopping center in Queens. The center is anchored by a 145,000 square foot Costco, a 135,000 square foot Century 21 and a 133,000 square foot Kohl’s. In addition, 47,000 square feet is leased to Toys “R” Us/Babies “R” Us (“Toys”), a one-third owned affiliate of Vornado. On September 18, 2017, Toys filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy relief;

• | The Alexander apartment tower, located above our Rego Park II shopping center, contains 312 units aggregating 255,000 square feet and is 94.6% leased as of December 31, 2017;

• | Paramus, located at the intersection of Routes 4 and 17 in Paramus, New Jersey, consists of 30.3 acres of land that is leased to IKEA Property, Inc.; and

• | Flushing, a 167,000 square foot building, located at Roosevelt Avenue and Main Street in Queens, that is sub-leased to New World Mall LLC for the remainder of our ground lease term.

Property to be developed

• | Rego Park III, a 140,000 square foot land parcel adjacent to the Rego Park II shopping center in Queens, at the intersection of Junction Boulevard and the Horace Harding Service Road.

We have determined that our properties have similar economic characteristics and meet the criteria that permit the properties to be aggregated into one reportable segment (the leasing, management, development and redeveloping of properties in the greater New York City metropolitan area). Our chief operating decision-maker assesses and measures segment operating results based on a performance measure referred to as net operating income at the individual operating segment. Net operating income for each property represents net rental revenues less operating expenses.
42

ALEXANDER’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation – The accompanying consolidated financial statements include our accounts and those of our consolidated subsidiaries. All intercompany amounts have been eliminated. Our financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), which requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain prior year balances have been reclassified in order to conform to current year presentation.
Recently Issued Accounting Literature – In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an update (“ASU 2014-09”) establishing Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”). ASU 2014-09, as amended by subsequent ASUs on the topic, establishes a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most of the existing revenue recognition guidance. This standard, which is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2017, requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services and also requires certain additional disclosures. We adopted this standard effective January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective approach, which requires applying the new standard to all existing contracts not yet completed as of the effective date and recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. We have completed our evaluation of the standard’s impact on our revenue streams. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2016, the FASB issued an update (“ASU 2016-01”) Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities to ASC Topic 825, Financial Instruments (“ASC 825”). ASU 2016-01 amends certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments. ASU 2016-01 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. We adopted this standard effective January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective approach. While the adoption of this standard requires us to continue to measure “marketable securities” at fair value at each reporting date, the changes in fair value will be recognized in current period earnings as opposed to “other comprehensive (loss) income.” As a result, on January 1, 2018 we recorded an increase to retained earnings of $5,156,000 to recognize the unrealized gains previously recorded within “accumulated other comprehensive income.” Subsequent changes in the fair value of our marketable securities will be recorded to “interest and other income, net.”
In February 2016, the FASB issued an update (“ASU 2016-02”) establishing ASC Topic 842, Leases, which sets out the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases for both lessees and lessors. ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed purchase. Lessees are required to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term greater than 12 months. Leases with a term of 12 months or less will be accounted for similar to existing guidance for operating leases. Lessees will recognize expense based on the effective interest method for finance leases or on a straight-line basis for operating leases. The accounting applied by the lessor is largely unchanged from that applied under the existing lease standard. We are currently evaluating the overall impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on our consolidated financial statements and believe that the standard will more significantly impact the accounting for leases in which we are a lessee. We will be required to record a right-of-use asset and lease liability for our Flushing property ground lease, equal to the present value of the remaining minimum lease payments, and will continue to recognize expense on a straight-line basis upon adoption of this standard. ASU 2016-02 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. We will adopt this standard effective January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective approach and will elect to use the practical expedients provided by this standard.
In March 2016, the FASB issued an update (“ASU 2016-09”) Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting to ASC Topic 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”). ASU 2016-09 amends several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 was effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The adoption of this update as of January 1, 2017 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
43

ALEXANDER’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - continued
In August 2016, the FASB issued an update (“ASU 2016-15”) Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments to ASC Topic 230, Statement of Cash Flows. ASU 2016-15 clarifies guidance on the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows to reduce diversity in practice with respect to (i) debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs, (ii) settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relation to the effective interest rate of the borrowing, (iii) contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, (iv) proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims, (v) proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies, including bank-owned life insurance policies, (vi) distributions received from equity method investees, (vii) beneficial interests in securitization transactions, and (viii) separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle. ASU 2016-15 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. We elected to early adopt ASU 2016-15 effective January 1, 2017. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In November 2016, the FASB issued an update (“ASU 2016-18”) Restricted Cash to ASC Topic 230, Statement of Cash Flows. ASU 2016-18 requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents will be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning of period and end of period balances on the statement of cash flows upon adoption of this standard. ASU 2016-18 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. We elected to early adopt ASU 2016-18 effective January 1, 2017, with retrospective application to our consolidated statements of cash flows. Accordingly, the consolidated statements of cash flows present a reconciliation of the changes in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash. Restricted cash primarily consists of cash held in a non-interest bearing escrow account in connection with our Rego Park I 100% cash collateralized mortgage, as well as security deposits and other cash escrowed under loan agreements for debt service, real estate taxes, property insurance and capital improvements.
In February 2017, the FASB issued an update (“ASU 2017-05”) Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets to ASC Subtopic 610-20, Other Income-Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets. ASU 2017-05 clarifies the scope of recently established guidance on nonfinancial asset derecognition, as well as the accounting for partial sales of nonfinancial assets. This update conforms the derecognition guidance on nonfinancial assets with the model for transactions in ASC 606. ASU 2017-05 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The adoption of this standard on January 1, 2018 is not expected to have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2017, the FASB issued an update (“ASU 2017-12”) Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities to ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”). ASU 2017-12 amends the hedge accounting recognition and presentation requirements in ASC 815. The update is intended to more closely align hedge accounting with companies’ risk management strategies, simplify the application of hedge accounting and increase transparency as to the scope and results of hedge programs. ASU 2017-12 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this standard on January 1, 2019 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Real Estate – Real estate is carried at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the carrying amount of our real estate, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization, was $754,324,000 and $780,814,000, respectively. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Depreciation requires an estimate by management of the useful life of each property and improvement as well as an allocation of the costs associated with a property to its various components. We capitalize all property operating expenses directly associated with and attributable to, the development and construction of a project, including interest expense. The capitalization period begins when development activities are underway and ends when it is determined that the asset is substantially complete and ready for its intended use, which is typically evidenced by the receipt of a temporary certificate of occupancy. General and administrative costs are expensed as incurred.
44

ALEXANDER’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - continued
Our properties and related intangible assets, including properties to be developed in the future, are individually reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. An impairment exists when the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. Estimates of future cash flows are based on our current plans, intended holding periods and available market information at the time the analyses are prepared. For our development properties, estimates of future cash flows also include all future expenditures necessary to develop the asset, including interest payments that will be capitalized as part of the cost of the asset. An impairment loss is recognized only if the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable and is measured based on the excess of the property’s carrying amount over its estimated fair value. If our estimates of future cash flows, anticipated holding periods, or fair values change, based on market conditions or otherwise, our evaluation of impairment charges may be different and such differences could be material to our consolidated financial statements. Estimates of future cash flows are subjective and are based, in part, on assumptions regarding future occupancy, rental rates and capital requirements that could differ materially from actual results. Plans to hold properties over longer periods decrease the likelihood of recording impairment losses.
Cash and Cash Equivalents – Cash and cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less and are carried at cost, which approximates fair value, due to their short-term maturities. The majority of our cash and cash equivalents consist of (i) deposits at major commercial banks, which may at times exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation limit, (ii) United States Treasury Bills, (iii) money market funds, which invest in United States Treasury Bills and (iv) certificates of deposit placed through an account registry service (“CDARS”). To date we have not experienced any losses on our invested cash.
Short-term Investments – Short-term investments consist of United States Treasury Bills with original maturities greater than three but less than six months. These highly liquid investments are classified as available-for-sale and are presented at fair value on our consolidated balance sheets. Prior to January 1, 2018, unrealized gains and losses resulting from these investments were included in “other comprehensive (loss) income.” Effective January 1, 2018, changes in the fair value of these investments are recognized in current period earnings in accordance with ASC 825.
Restricted Cash – Restricted cash primarily consists of cash held in a non-interest bearing escrow account in connection with our Rego Park I 100% cash collateralized mortgage, as well as security deposits and other cash escrowed under loan agreements for debt service, real estate taxes, property insurance and capital improvements.
Marketable Securities – Our marketable securities consist of common shares of The Macerich Company (NYSE: MAC) (“Macerich”), which are classified as available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities are presented at fair value on our consolidated balance sheets. Prior to January 1, 2018, unrealized gains and losses resulting from the mark-to-market of these securities were included in “other comprehensive (loss) income.” Effective January 1, 2018, changes in the fair value of these securities are recognized in current period earnings in accordance with ASC 825. We evaluate our marketable securities for impairment at the end of each reporting period. If investments have unrealized losses, we evaluate the underlying cause of the decline in value and the estimated recovery period, as well as the severity and duration of the decline. In our evaluation, we consider our ability and intent to hold our investment for a reasonable period of time sufficient for us to recover our cost basis, as well as the near-term prospects for the investment in relation to the severity and duration of the decline.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts – We periodically evaluate the collectibility of amounts due from tenants, including the receivable arising from the straight-lining of rents, and maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts ($1,501,000 and $1,473,000 as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively) for estimated losses resulting from the inability of tenants to make required payments under the lease agreements. We exercise judgment in establishing these allowances and consider payment history and current credit status in developing these estimates.
45

ALEXANDER’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - continued
Deferred Charges – Direct financing costs are deferred and amortized over the terms of the related agreements as a component of interest and debt expense. Direct costs related to leasing activities are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the lives of the related leases. All other deferred charges are amortized on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest rate method, in accordance with the terms of the agreements to which they relate.
Revenue Recognition – We have the following revenue sources and revenue recognition policies:
Base Rent – revenue arising from tenant leases. These rents are recognized over the non-cancelable term of the related leases on a straight-line basis, which includes the effects of rent steps and free rent abatements under the leases. We commence rental revenue recognition when the tenant takes possession of the leased space and the leased space is substantially ready for its intended use. In addition, in circumstances where we provide a tenant improvement allowance for improvements that are owned by the tenant, we recognize the allowance as a reduction of rental revenue on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.
Percentage Rent – revenue arising from retail tenant leases that is contingent upon the sales of tenants exceeding defined thresholds. These rents are recognized only after the contingency has been removed (i.e., when tenant sales thresholds have been achieved).
Expense Reimbursements – revenue arising from tenant leases which provide for the recovery of all or a portion of the operating expenses and real estate taxes of the respective properties. This revenue is recognized in the same periods as the expenses are incurred.
Parking Income – revenue arising from the rental of parking space at our properties. This income is recognized as the service is provided.
Income Taxes – We operate in a manner intended to enable us to continue to qualify as a REIT under Sections 856 – 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT under the Code, we must distribute at least 90% of our taxable income to stockholders each year. We distribute to our stockholders 100% of our taxable income and therefore, no provision for Federal income taxes is required. Dividends distributed for the year ended December 31, 2017 were characterized, for federal income taxes, as 99.5% ordinary income and 0.5% long-term capital gain income. Dividends distributed for the year ended December 31, 2016 were characterized, for federal income taxes, as 97.7% ordinary income and 2.3% long-term capital gain income. Dividends distributed for the year ended December 31, 2015 were categorized, for federal income tax purposes, as 97.3% ordinary income and 2.7% long-term capital gain income.
The following table reconciles our net income to estimated taxable income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

(Unaudited and in thousands) | Year Ended December 31,
| 2017 |  | 2016 |  | 2015
Net income | $ | 80,509 |  |  | $ | 86,477 |  |  | $ | 76,907 |
Straight-line rent adjustments | 4,250 |  |  | 2,347 |  |  | (1,418 | )
Depreciation and amortization timing differences | 3,084 |  |  | (14,534 | ) |  | 2,477 |
Other | (343 | ) |  | 2,975 |  |  | 751 |
Estimated taxable income | $ | 87,500 |  |  | $ | 77,265 |  |  | $ | 78,717 |

As of December 31, 2017, the net basis of our assets and liabilities for tax purposes are approximately $199,268,000 lower than the amount reported for financial statement purposes.
46

ALEXANDER’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
3. REGO PARK II LOAN PARTICIPATION
On July 28, 2017, we entered into a participation and servicing agreement with the lender on our Rego Park II shopping center loan, which matures on November 30, 2018. We invested $200,000,000 to participate in the loan and are entitled to interest at LIBOR plus 1.60% (3.17% as of December 31, 2017). The investment is presented as “Rego Park II loan participation” on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2017 and interest earned is recognized as “interest and other income, net” in our consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2017.
4. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Vornado
As of December 31, 2017, Vornado owned 32.4% of our outstanding common stock. We are managed by, and our properties are leased and developed by, Vornado, pursuant to the agreements described below, which expire in March of each year and are automatically renewable.
Steven Roth is the Chairman of our Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer, the Managing General Partner of Interstate Properties (“Interstate”), a New Jersey general partnership, and the Chairman of the Board of Trustees and Chief Executive Officer of Vornado. As of December 31, 2017, Mr. Roth, Interstate and its other two general partners, David Mandelbaum and Russell B. Wight, Jr. (who are also directors of the Company and trustees of Vornado) owned, in the aggregate, 26.2% of our outstanding common stock, in addition to the 2.3% they indirectly own through Vornado. Joseph Macnow, our Treasurer, is the Executive Vice President - Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer of Vornado. Matthew Iocco, our Chief Financial Officer, is the Executive Vice President - Chief Accounting Officer of Vornado.
Management and Development Agreements
We pay Vornado an annual management fee equal to the sum of (i) $2,800,000, (ii) 2% of gross revenue from the Rego Park II shopping center, (iii) $0.50 per square foot of the tenant-occupied office and retail space at 731 Lexington Avenue, and (iv) $306,000, escalating at 3% per annum, for managing the common area of 731 Lexington Avenue. Vornado is also entitled to a development fee equal to 6% of development costs, as defined.
Leasing and Other Agreements
Vornado also provides us with leasing services for a fee of 3% of rent for the first ten years of a lease term, 2% of rent for the eleventh through the twentieth year of a lease term, and 1% of rent for the twenty-first through thirtieth year of a lease term, subject to the payment of rents by tenants. In the event third-party real estate brokers are used, the fees to Vornado increase by 1% and Vornado is responsible for the fees to the third-party real estate brokers.
Vornado is also entitled to a commission upon the sale of any of our assets equal to 3% of gross proceeds, as defined, for asset sales less than $50,000,000 and 1% of gross proceeds, as defined, for asset sales of $50,000,000 or more.
We also have agreements with Building Maintenance Services, a wholly owned subsidiary of Vornado, to supervise (i) cleaning, engineering and security services at our Lexington Avenue property and (ii) security services at our Rego Park I and Rego Park II properties and The Alexander apartment tower.
47

ALEXANDER’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
4. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS - continued
The following is a summary of fees to Vornado under the various agreements discussed above.

| Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands) | 2017 |  | 2016 |  | 2015
Company management fees | $ | 2,800 |  |  | $ | 2,800 |  |  | $ | 2,800 |
Development fees | 29 |  |  | 194 |  |  | 2,435 |
Leasing fees | 1,829 |  |  | 7,401 |  |  | 2,950 |
Property management, cleaning, engineering |  |  |  |  |
and security fees | 4,114 |  |  | 4,033 |  |  | 3,614 |
| $ | 8,772 |  |  | $ | 14,428 |  |  | $ | 11,799 |

As of December 31, 2017, the amounts due to Vornado were $1,811,000 for leasing fees; $658,000 for management, property management, cleaning, engineering and security fees; and $21,000 for development fees. As of December 31, 2016, the amounts due to Vornado were $428,000 for management, property management, cleaning, engineering and security fees; $415,000 for leasing fees; and $54,000 for development fees. In January 2016, we paid an $8,916,000 leasing commission related to a lease amendment signed with Bloomberg, of which $7,200,000 was to a third party broker and $1,716,000 was to Vornado. In March 2016, we paid Vornado a development fee of $5,784,000 related to The Alexander apartment tower.
Toys
Our affiliate, Vornado, owns 32.5% of Toys. Joseph Macnow, Vornado’s Executive Vice President - Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer and Wendy A. Silverstein, a member of our Board of Directors, represent Vornado as members of Toys’ Board of Directors. Toys leases 47,000 square feet of retail space at our Rego Park II shopping center ($2,600,000 of annual revenue). On September 18, 2017, Toys filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy relief. There are $694,000 of tenant improvements, $257,000 of unamortized deferred leasing costs and $544,000 of receivables arising from the straight-lining of rent on our consolidated balance sheet related to the Toys lease as of December 31, 2017.
5. MARKETABLE SECURITIES
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, we owned 535,265 common shares of Macerich. These shares have an economic cost of $56.05 per share, or $30,000,000 in the aggregate. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the fair value of these shares was $35,156,000 and $37,918,000, respectively, based on Macerich’s closing share price of $65.68 per share and $70.84 per share, respectively. These shares are included in “marketable securities” on our consolidated balance sheets and are classified as available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities are presented at fair value on our consolidated balance sheets. Prior to January 1, 2018, unrealized gains and losses resulting from the mark-to-market of these securities were included in “other comprehensive (loss) income.” Effective January 1, 2018, changes in the fair value of these securities are recognized in current period earnings in accordance with ASC 825. Other comprehensive (loss) income includes unrealized losses of $2,762,000, $5,273,000 and $1,455,000 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
In October 2015, we recognized $2,141,000 of dividend income as a result of a special dividend declared by Macerich, which is included as a component of “interest and other income, net,” in our consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2015.
48

ALEXANDER’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
6. MORTGAGES PAYABLE
On June 1, 2017, we completed a $500,000,000 refinancing of the office portion of 731 Lexington Avenue. The interest-only loan is at LIBOR plus 0.90% and matures in June 2020, with four one-year extension options. In connection therewith, we purchased an interest rate cap with a notional amount of $500,000,000 that caps LIBOR at a rate of 6.0%. The property was previously encumbered by a $300,000,000 interest-only mortgage at LIBOR plus 0.95% which was scheduled to mature in March 2021.
The following is a summary of our outstanding mortgages payable. We may refinance our maturing debt as it comes due or choose to repay it.

|  |  |  |  | Interest Rate at December 31, 2017 |  | Balance at December 31,
(Amounts in thousands) | Maturity(1) |  |  | 2017 |  | 2016
First mortgages secured by: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Rego Park I shopping center (100% cash | Mar. 2018 |  | 0.35% |  | $ | 78,246 |  |  | $ | 78,246 |
|  | collateralized) |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Paramus | Oct. 2018 |  | 2.90% |  | 68,000 |  |  | 68,000 |
|  | Rego Park II shopping center(2) | Nov. 2018 |  | 3.42% |  | 256,194 |  |  | 259,901 |
|  | 731 Lexington Avenue, retail space(3) | Aug. 2022 |  | 2.78% |  | 350,000 |  |  | 350,000 |
|  | 731 Lexington Avenue, office space(4) | Jun. 2024 |  | 2.38% |  | 500,000 |  |  | 300,000 |
|  | Total |  |  |  |  | 1,252,440 |  |  | 1,056,147 |
|  | Deferred debt issuance costs, net of accumulated |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | amortization of $6,315 and $6,824, respectively |  |  |  |  | (12,218 | ) |  | (3,788 | )
|  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 1,240,222 |  |  | $ | 1,052,359 |
(1) |  | Represents the extended maturity where we have the unilateral right to extend.
(2) |  | This loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.85%. See page 47 for details of our Rego Park II loan participation.
(3) |  | This loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.40%.
(4) |  | This loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 0.90%. |  |  |  |  |  |  |

All of our debt is secured by mortgages and/or pledges of the stock of the subsidiaries holding the properties. The net carrying value of real estate collateralizing the debt amounted to $640,025,000 as of December 31, 2017. Our existing financing documents contain covenants that limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness on these properties, and in certain circumstances, provide for lender approval of tenants’ leases and yield maintenance to prepay them. As of December 31, 2017, the principal repayments for the next five years and thereafter are as follows:

(Amounts in thousands) |  |
Year Ending December 31, |  | Amount
2018 |  | $ | 402,440 |
2019 |  | — |
2020 |  | — |
2021 |  | — |
2022 |  | 350,000 |
Thereafter |  | 500,000 |

49

ALEXANDER’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
7. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures defines fair value and establishes a framework for measuring fair value. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three levels: Level 1 – quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities; Level 2 – observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted in active markets, but corroborated by market data; and Level 3 – unobservable inputs that are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs and the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs. In determining fair value, we utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible as well as consider counterparty credit risk in our assessment of fair value.
Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value
Financial assets measured at fair value on our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 consist of marketable securities, which are presented in the table below based on their level in the fair value hierarchy, and an interest rate cap, which fair value was insignificant as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. There were no financial liabilities measured at fair value as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.

| As of December 31, 2017
(Amounts in thousands) | Total |  | Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3
Marketable securities | $ | 35,156 |  |  | $ | 35,156 |  |  | — |  |  | — |
| As of December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands) | Total |  | Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3
Marketable securities | $ | 37,918 |  |  | $ | 37,918 |  |  | — |  |  | — |

Financial Assets and Liabilities not Measured at Fair Value
Financial assets and liabilities that are not measured at fair value on our consolidated balance sheets include cash equivalents, the Rego Park II loan participation and mortgages payable. Cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value due to their short-term maturities and are classified as Level 1. The fair values of the Rego Park II loan participation and our mortgages payable are calculated by discounting the future contractual cash flows of these instruments using current risk-adjusted rates available to borrowers with similar credit ratings, which are provided by a third-party specialist, and are classified as Level 2. The table below summarizes the carrying amount and fair value of these financial instruments as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.

| As of December 31, 2017 |  | As of December 31, 2016
| Carrying |  | Fair |  | Carrying |  | Fair
(Amounts in thousands) | Amount |  | Value |  | Amount |  | Value
Assets: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash equivalents | $ | 273,914 |  |  | $ | 273,914 |  |  | $ | 256,370 |  |  | $ | 256,370 |
Rego Park II loan participation | 198,537 |  |  | 198,000 |  |  | — |  |  | — |
| 472,451 |  |  | 471,914 |  |  | 256,370 |  |  | 256,370 |
Liabilities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Mortgages payable (excluding deferred debt issuance costs, net) | $ | 1,252,440 |  |  | $ | 1,239,000 |  |  | $ | 1,056,147 |  |  | $ | 1,045,000 |

50

ALEXANDER’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
8. LEASES
As Lessor
We lease space to tenants in an office building and in retail centers. The rental terms range from approximately 5 to 25 years. The leases provide for the payment of fixed base rents payable monthly in advance as well as reimbursements of real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance costs. Retail leases may also provide for the payment by the lessee of additional rents based on a percentage of their sales. We also lease residential space at The Alexander apartment tower with 1 or 2 year lease terms.
Future base rental revenue under these non-cancelable operating leases is as follows:

(Amounts in thousands) |  |
Year Ending December 31, |  | Amount
2018 |  | $ | 144,712 |
2019 |  | 138,649 |
2020 |  | 136,536 |
2021 |  | 119,962 |
2022 |  | 111,533 |
Thereafter |  | 783,019 |

These future minimum amounts do not include additional rents based on a percentage of retail tenants’ sales. These rents were $174,000, $182,000 and $94,000, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.
Bloomberg accounted for revenue of $105,224,000, $104,590,000 and $94,468,000, in the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, representing approximately 46%, 46% and 45% of our total revenues in each year, respectively. No other tenant accounted for more than 10% of our total revenues. If we were to lose Bloomberg as a tenant, or if Bloomberg were to be unable to fulfill its obligations under its lease, it would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. In order to assist us in our continuing assessment of Bloomberg’s creditworthiness, we receive certain confidential financial information and metrics from Bloomberg. In addition, we access and evaluate financial information regarding Bloomberg from other private sources, as well as publicly available data.
As Lessee
We are a tenant under a long-term ground lease at our Flushing property, which expires in 2027 and has one 10-year extension option. Future lease payments under this operating lease, excluding the extension option, are as follows:

(Amounts in thousands) |  |
Year Ending December 31, |  | Amount
2018 |  | $ | 800 |
2019 |  | 800 |
2020 |  | 800 |
2021 |  | 800 |
2022 |  | 800 |
Thereafter |  | 3,267 |

Rent expense was $746,000 in each of the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.
51

ALEXANDER’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
9. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718. Our 2016 Omnibus Stock Plan (the “Plan”) provides for grants of incentive and non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, deferred stock units (“DSUs”) and performance shares, as defined, to the directors, officers and employees of the Company and Vornado.
On May 18, 2017, we granted each of the members of our Board of Directors 183 DSUs with a grant date fair value of $56,250 per grant, or $394,000 in the aggregate. The DSUs entitle the holders to receive shares of the Company’s common stock without the payment of any consideration. The DSUs vested immediately and accordingly, were expensed on the date of grant, but the shares of common stock underlying the DSUs are not deliverable to the grantee until the grantee is no longer serving on the Company’s Board of Directors. As of December 31, 2017, there were 8,692 DSUs outstanding and 497,095 shares were available for future grant under the Plan.
10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Insurance
We maintain general liability insurance with limits of $300,000,000 per occurrence and per property, and all-risk property and rental value insurance coverage with limits of $1.7 billion per occurrence, including coverage for acts of terrorism, with sub-limits for certain perils such as floods and earthquakes on each of our properties.
Fifty Ninth Street Insurance Company, LLC (“FNSIC”), our wholly owned consolidated subsidiary, acts as a direct insurer for coverage for acts of terrorism, including nuclear, biological, chemical and radiological (“NBCR”) acts, as defined by the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act, which expires in December 2020. Coverage for acts of terrorism (including NBCR acts) is up to $1.7 billion per occurrence and in the aggregate. Coverage for acts of terrorism (excluding NBCR acts) is fully reinsured by third party insurance companies and the Federal government with no exposure to FNSIC. For NBCR acts, FNSIC is responsible for a $293,000 deductible ($306,000 effective January 1, 2018) and 17% of the balance (18% effective January 1, 2018) of a covered loss, and the Federal government is responsible for the remaining 83% (82% effective January 1, 2018) of a covered loss. We are ultimately responsible for any loss incurred by FNSIC.
We continue to monitor the state of the insurance market and the scope and costs of coverage for acts of terrorism. However, we cannot anticipate what coverage will be available on commercially reasonable terms in the future. We are responsible for deductibles and losses in excess of our insurance coverage, which could be material.
Our mortgage loans are non-recourse to us and contain customary covenants requiring us to maintain insurance. Although we believe that we have adequate insurance coverage for purposes of these agreements, we may not be able to obtain an equivalent amount of coverage at reasonable costs in the future. Further, if lenders insist on greater coverage than we are able to obtain, it could adversely affect our ability to finance our properties.
Tenant Matters
On April 4, 2017, Sears closed its 195,000 square foot store at our Rego Park I property. Annual revenue from Sears is approximately $10,600,000, under a lease which expires in March 2021. In its 2016 annual report on Form 10-K, Sears indicated that substantial doubt exists related to its ability to continue as a going concern. There are $3,865,000 of receivables arising from the straight-lining of rent and $406,000 of unamortized deferred leasing costs on our consolidated balance sheet related to the Sears lease as of December 31, 2017 which we will continue to assess for recoverability.
On September 19, 2017, the bankruptcy court approved the terms of an order stipulation between Le Cirque, a restaurant operator which leases 13,000 square feet at our 731 Lexington Avenue property (approximately $1,200,000 of annual revenue), and the Company which terminated the lease on January 5, 2018 (original lease expiration was May 2021). As a result, we began accelerating depreciation and amortization of approximately $2,780,000 of tenant improvements and deferred leasing costs over the new lease term, of which approximately $2,650,000 was recognized in the year ended December 31, 2017 and approximately $130,000 will be recognized in the quarter ending March 31, 2018.
52

ALEXANDER’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES - continued
Rego Park I Litigation
In June 2014, Sears Roebuck and Co. (“Sears”) filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court of the State of New York against Vornado and us (and certain of our subsidiaries) with regard to space that Sears leases at our Rego Park I property alleging that the defendants are liable for harm that Sears has suffered as a result of (a) water intrusions into the premises, (b) two fires in February 2014 that caused damages to those premises, and (c) alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act in the premises’ parking garage. Sears asserted various causes of actions for damages and sought to compel compliance with landlord’s obligations to repair the premises and to provide security, and to compel us to abate a nuisance that Sears claims was a cause of the water intrusions into its premises. In addition to injunctive relief, Sears sought, among other things, damages of not less than $4 million and future damages it estimated would not be less than $25 million. In March 2016, Sears withdrew its claim for future damages leaving a remaining claim for property damages, which we estimate to be approximately $650,000 based on information provided by Sears. We intend to defend the remaining claim vigorously. The amount or range of reasonably possible losses, if any, is not expected to be greater than $650,000.
Paramus
In 2001, we leased 30.3 acres of land located in Paramus, New Jersey to IKEA Property, Inc. The lease has a purchase option in 2021 for $75,000,000. The property is encumbered by a $68,000,000 interest-only mortgage loan with a fixed rate of 2.90%, which matures on October 5, 2018. The annual triple-net rent is the sum of $700,000 plus the amount of debt service on the mortgage loan. If the purchase option is exercised, we will receive net cash proceeds of approximately $7,000,000 and recognize a gain on sale of land of approximately $60,000,000. If the purchase option is not exercised, the triple-net rent for the last 20 years would include debt service sufficient to fully amortize $68,000,000 over the remaining 20 years lease term.
Letters of Credit
Approximately $1,474,000 of standby letters of credit were issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017.
Other
In October 2015, the New York City Department of Finance (“NYC DOF”) issued a Notice of Determination to us assessing an additional $22,910,000 of transfer taxes (including interest and penalties as of December 31, 2017) in connection with the sale of Kings Plaza Regional Shopping Center in November 2012. We believe that the NYC DOF’s claim is without merit and intend to vigorously contest this assessment. We have determined that the likelihood of a loss related to this issue is not probable and, after consultation with legal counsel, that the outcome of this assessment is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
We received approximately $396,000, $825,000 and $2,100,000 from bankruptcy recoveries during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which is included as “interest and other income, net” in our consolidated statements of income.
There are various other legal actions against us in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, the outcome of such matters in the aggregate will not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
11. MULTIEMPLOYER BENEFIT PLANS
Our subsidiaries make contributions to certain multiemployer defined benefit plans (“Multiemployer Pension Plans”) and health plans (“Multiemployer Health Plans”) for our union represented employees, pursuant to the respective collective bargaining agreements.
53

ALEXANDER’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
11. MULTIEMPLOYER BENEFIT PLANS - continued
Multiemployer Pension Plans
Multiemployer Pension Plans differ from single-employer pension plans in that (i) contributions to multiemployer plans may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers and (ii) if other participating employers fail to make their contributions, each of our subsidiaries may be required to bear their pro rata share of unfunded obligations. If a participating subsidiary withdraws from a plan in which it participates, it may be subject to a withdrawal liability. As of December 31, 2017, our subsidiaries’ participation in these plans were not significant to our consolidated financial statements.
In the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 our subsidiaries contributed $162,000, $147,000 and $144,000, respectively, towards Multiemployer Pension Plans. Our subsidiaries’ contributions did not represent more than 5% of total employer contributions in any of these plans for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.
Multiemployer Health Plans
Multiemployer Health Plans in which our subsidiaries participate provide health benefits to eligible active and retired employees. In the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 our subsidiaries contributed $619,000, $539,000 and $554,000, respectively, towards these plans.
12. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted income per share, including a reconciliation of net income and the number of shares used in computing basic and diluted income per share. Basic income per share is determined using the weighted average shares of common stock (including DSUs) outstanding during the period. Diluted income per share is determined using the weighted average shares of common stock (including DSUs) outstanding during the period, and assumes all potentially dilutive securities were converted into common shares at the earliest date possible. There were no potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

| For the Year Ended December 31,
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts) | 2017 |  | 2016 |  | 2015
Net income | $ | 80,509 |  |  | $ | 86,477 |  |  | $ | 76,907 |
Weighted average shares outstanding – basic and diluted | 5,115,501 |  |  | 5,114,084 |  |  | 5,112,352 |
Net income per common share – basic and diluted | $ | 15.74 |  |  | $ | 16.91 |  |  | $ | 15.04 |

54

ALEXANDER’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
13. SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS (UNAUDITED)

|  |  |  |  |  | Net Income Per Common Share(1)
| (Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts) | Revenues |  | Net Income |  | Basic |  | Diluted
| 2017 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| December 31 | $ | 58,061 |  |  | $ | 17,883 |  |  | $ | 3.50 |  |  | $ | 3.50 |
| September 30 | 58,094 |  |  | 20,299 |  |  | 3.97 |  |  | 3.97 |
| June 30 | 57,190 |  |  | 20,660 |  |  | 4.04 |  |  | 4.04 |
| March 31 | 57,229 |  |  | 21,667 |  |  | 4.24 |  |  | 4.24 |
| 2016 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| December 31 | $ | 57,253 |  |  | $ | 21,655 |  |  | $ | 4.23 |  |  | $ | 4.23 |
| September 30 | 57,120 |  |  | 21,036 |  |  | 4.11 |  |  | 4.11 |
| June 30 | 57,005 |  |  | 21,767 |  |  | 4.26 |  |  | 4.26 |
| March 31 | 55,558 |  |  | 22,019 |  |  | 4.31 |  |  | 4.31 |
_______________________ |  |  |  |  |  |  |
(1) | The total for the year may differ from the sum of the quarters as a result of weighting.

55

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures – Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting – There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
56

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER
FINANCIAL REPORTING
The management of Alexander’s, Inc., together with its consolidated subsidiaries (the “Company”), is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company’s financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
As of December 31, 2017, management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the framework established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management has determined that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 is effective.
The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurances that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the directors of the Company; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.
The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing on page 58 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which expresses an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017.
57

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of
Alexander’s, Inc.
Paramus, New Jersey
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Alexander’s, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017, of the Company and our report dated February 12, 2018, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
February 12, 2018
58

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Information relating to our directors, including our audit committee and audit committee financial expert, will be contained in a definitive Proxy Statement involving the election of directors pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We will file the Proxy Statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after December 31, 2017. Such information is incorporated by reference herein. Also incorporated herein by reference is the information under the caption “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” of the Proxy Statement.
The following is a list of the names, ages, principal occupations and positions with us of our executive officers and the positions held by such officers during the past five years.

|  |  |  | PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION, POSITION AND OFFICE
Name |  | Age |  | (Current and during past five years with the Company unless otherwise stated)
Steven Roth |  | 76 |  | Chairman of the Board since May 2004 and Chief Executive Officer since March 1995; Chairman of the Board of Vornado Realty Trust since May 1989; Chief Executive Officer of Vornado Realty Trust since April 2013 and from May 1989 to May 2009; a Trustee of Vornado Realty Trust since 1979; and Managing General Partner of Interstate Properties.
Matthew Iocco |  | 47 |  | Chief Financial Officer since April 2017; Executive Vice President - Chief Accounting Officer of Vornado Realty Trust since May 2015; and Senior Vice President - Chief Accounting Officer of Vornado Realty Trust from May 2012 to May 2015.

We have a code of business conduct and ethics that applies to, among others, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The code is posted on our website at www.alx-inc.com. We intend to satisfy our disclosure obligation regarding amendments and waivers of this code applicable to our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer by posting such information on our website.
59

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information relating to executive compensation will be contained in the Proxy Statement referred to in “Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Such information is incorporated by reference herein.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Information relating to security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters, except as set forth below, will be contained in the Proxy Statement referred to in “Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Such information is incorporated by reference herein.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2017, regarding our equity compensation.

Plan Category |  | (a) Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights |  | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights |  | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |  | 8,692 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | 497,095 |
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |  | N/A |  |  | N/A |  |  | N/A |
Total |  | 8,692 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | 497,095 |

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Information relating to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be contained in the Proxy Statement referred to in “Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Such information is incorporated by reference herein.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Information relating to principal accounting fees and services will be contained in the Proxy Statement referred to in “Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Such information is incorporated by reference herein.
60

PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
1. The consolidated financial statements are set forth in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
2. The following financial statement schedules should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

| Pages in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts – years ended |
December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 | 62
Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation as of |
December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 | 63

All other financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, not required, or the information is included elsewhere in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.
61

ALEXANDER’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(Amounts in thousands)
Column A |  | Column B |  | Column C |  | Column D |  | Column E
Description |  | Balance at Beginning of Year |  | Additions: Charged Against Operations |  | Deductions: Uncollectible Accounts Written Off |  | Balance
Allowance for doubtful accounts: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Year Ended December 31, 2017 |  | $ | 1,473 |  |  | $ | 53 |  |  | $ | (25 | ) |  | $ | 1,501 |
Year Ended December 31, 2016 |  | $ | 918 |  |  | $ | 557 |  |  | $ | (2 | ) |  | $ | 1,473 |
Year Ended December 31, 2015 |  | $ | 1,544 |  |  | $ | (314 | ) |  | $ | (312 | ) |  | $ | 918 |

62

ALEXANDER’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 2017
(Amounts in thousands)
COLUMN A | COLUMN B |  | COLUMN C |  | COLUMN D |  | COLUMN E |  | COLUMN F |  | COLUMN G |  | COLUMN H |  | COLUMN I
|  |  |  |  |  |  | Gross Amount at Which |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Life on which Depreciation in Latest Income Statement is Computed
|  |  | Initial Cost to Company(2) |  | Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition |  | Carried at Close of Period |  | Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  | Buildings and Leasehold Improvements |  |  |  |  | Buildings and Leasehold Improvements |  | Development and Construction In Progress |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Date of Construction |  | Date Acquired(2) |
Description | Encumbrances(1) |  | Land |  |  |  | Land |  |  |  | Total(3) |  |  |  |
New York, NY |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Rego Park I | $ | 78,246 |  |  | $ | 1,647 |  |  | $ | 8,953 |  |  | $ | 53,390 |  |  | $ | 1,647 |  |  | $ | 62,268 |  |  | $ | 75 |  |  | $ | 63,990 |  |  | $ | 33,073 |  |  | 1959 |  | 1992 |  | 3-39 years
Rego Park II | 256,194 |  |  | 3,127 |  |  | 1,467 |  |  | 388,890 |  |  | 3,127 |  |  | 390,118 |  |  | 239 |  |  | 393,484 |  |  | 83,963 |  |  | 2009 |  | 1992 |  | 3-40 years
The Alexander apartment tower | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 119,112 |  |  | — |  |  | 119,112 |  |  | — |  |  | 119,112 |  |  | 9,856 |  |  | 2016 |  | 1992 |  | 3-39 years
Rego Park III | — |  |  | 779 |  |  | — |  |  | 3,740 |  |  | 779 |  |  | 503 |  |  | 3,237 |  |  | 4,519 |  |  | 228 |  |  | N/A |  | 1992 |  | 5-15 years
Flushing | — |  |  | — |  |  | 1,660 |  |  | (107 | ) |  | — |  |  | 1,553 |  |  | — |  |  | 1,553 |  |  | 968 |  |  | 1975(4) |  | 1992 |  | N/A
Lexington Avenue | 850,000 |  |  | 14,432 |  |  | 12,355 |  |  | 416,002 |  |  | 27,497 |  |  | 415,292 |  |  | — |  |  | 442,789 |  |  | 154,956 |  |  | 2003 |  | 1992 |  | 9-39 years
Paramus, NJ | 68,000 |  |  | 1,441 |  |  | — |  |  | 10,313 |  |  | 11,754 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 11,754 |  |  | — |  |  | N/A |  | 1992 |  | N/A
Other Properties | — |  |  | 167 |  |  | 1,804 |  |  | (1,804 | ) |  | 167 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 167 |  |  | — |  |  | N/A |  | 1992 |  | N/A
TOTAL | $ | 1,252,440 |  |  | $ | 21,593 |  |  | $ | 26,239 |  |  | $ | 989,536 |  |  | $ | 44,971 |  |  | $ | 988,846 |  |  | $ | 3,551 |  |  | $ | 1,037,368 |  |  | $ | 283,044 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
(1) Excludes deferred debt issuance costs, net of $12,218.
(2) Initial cost is as of May 15, 1992 (the date on which the Company commenced its real estate operations).
(3) The net basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities for tax purposes is approximately $199,268 lower than the amount reported for financial statement purposes.
(4) Represents the date the lease was acquired.

63

ALEXANDER’S, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
(Amounts in thousands)
|  | December 31,
|  | 2017 |  | 2016 |  | 2015
REAL ESTATE: |  |  |  |  |  |
Balance at beginning of period |  | $ | 1,033,551 |  |  | $ | 1,029,472 |  |  | $ | 993,927 |
Changes during the period: |  |  |  |  |  |
Land |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Buildings and leasehold improvements |  | 3,046 |  |  | 12,464 |  |  | 112,538 |
Development and construction in progress |  | 771 |  |  | (6,706 | ) |  | (65,803 | )
|  | 1,037,368 |  |  | 1,035,230 |  |  | 1,040,662 |
Less: Fully depreciated assets |  | — |  |  | (1,679 | ) |  | (11,190 | )
Balance at end of period |  | $ | 1,037,368 |  |  | $ | 1,033,551 |  |  | $ | 1,029,472 |
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION: |  |  |  |  |  |
Balance at beginning of period |  | $ | 252,737 |  |  | $ | 225,533 |  |  | $ | 210,025 |
Additions charged to operating expenses |  | 30,307 |  |  | 28,883 |  |  | 26,698 |
|  | 283,044 |  |  | 254,416 |  |  | 236,723 |
Less: Fully depreciated assets |  | — |  |  | (1,679 | ) |  | (11,190 | )
Balance at end of period |  | $ | 283,044 |  |  | $ | 252,737 |  |  | $ | 225,533 |

64

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES - continued
(b) Exhibits

Exhibit No. |  |  |  |  |
3.1 |  | - | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on September 20, 1995 | * |
3.2 |  | - | By-laws, as amended. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3(ii) to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000 | * |
10.1 |  | - | Real Estate Retention Agreement dated as of July 20, 1992, between Vornado Realty Trust and Keen Realty Consultants, Inc., each as special real estate consultants, and the Company. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10(i)(O) to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 25, 1992 | * |
10.2 |  | - | Extension Agreement to the Real Estate Retention Agreement, dated as of February 6, 1995, between the Company and Vornado Realty Trust. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10(i)(G)(2) to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994 | * |
10.3 |  | - | Agreement of Lease dated as of April 30, 2001 between Seven Thirty One Limited Partnership, landlord, and Bloomberg L.P., tenant. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10(v) B to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2001, filed on August 2, 2001 | * |
10.4 |  | - | Lease dated as of October 2, 2001 by and between ALX of Paramus LLC, as Landlord, and IKEA Property, Inc. as Tenant. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10(v)(C)(4) to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, filed on March 13, 2002 | * |
10.5 |  | - | First Amendment to Real Estate Retention Agreement, dated as of July 3, 2002, by and between Alexander’s, Inc. and Vornado Realty, L.P. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10(i)(E)(3) to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, filed on August 7, 2002 | * |
10.6 |  | - | 59th Street Real Estate Retention Agreement, dated as of July 3, 2002, by and between Vornado Realty, L.P., 731 Residential LLC and 731 Commercial LLC. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10(i)(E)(4) to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, filed on August 7, 2002 | * |
10.7 |  | - | Amended and Restated Management and Development Agreement, dated as of July 3, 2002, by and between Alexander’s, Inc., the subsidiaries party thereto and Vornado Management Corp. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10(i)(F)(1) to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, filed on August 7, 2002 | * |
10.8 |  | - | Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement of 731 Residential LLC, dated as of July 3, 2002, among 731 Residential Holding LLC, as the sole member, Domenic A. Borriello, as an Independent Manager and Kim Lutthang, as an Independent Manager. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10(i)(A)(1) to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, filed on August 7, 2002 | * |
10.9 |  | - | Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement of 731 Commercial LLC, dated as of July 3, 2002, among 731 Commercial Holding LLC, as the sole member, Domenic A. Borriello, as an Independent Manager and Kim Lutthang, as an Independent Manager. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10(i)(A)(2) to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, filed on August 7, 2002 | * |
10.10 |  | - | Reimbursement Agreement, dated as of July 3, 2002, by and between Alexander’s, Inc., 731 Commercial LLC, 731 Residential LLC and Vornado Realty, L.P. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10(i)(C)(8) to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, filed on August 7, 2002 | * |
|  |  | ___________________ |  |
| * |  | Incorporated by reference. |  |

65

10.11 |  | - | First Amendment of Lease, dated as of April 19, 2002, between Seven Thirty One Limited Partnership, landlord and Bloomberg L.P., tenant. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10(v)(B)(2) to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2002, filed on August 7, 2002 | * |
10.12 |  | - | Second Amendment to Real Estate Retention Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2007, by and between Alexander’s, Inc. and Vornado Realty L.P. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.64 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed on February 26, 2007 | * |
10.13 |  | - | Amendment to 59th Street Real Estate Retention agreement, dated as of January 1, 2007, by and among Vornado Realty L.P., 731 Retail One LLC, 731 Restaurant LLC, 731 Office One LLC and 731 Office Two LLC. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.65 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed on February 26, 2007 | * |
10.14 |  | - | First Amendment to Amended and Restated Management and Development Agreement, dated as of July 6, 2005, by and between Alexander’s, Inc., the subsidiaries party thereto and Vornado Management Corp. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.52 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed on February 25, 2008 | * |
10.15 |  | - | Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Management and Development Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2007, by and between Alexander’s, Inc., the subsidiaries party thereto and Vornado Management Corp. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.53 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed on February 25, 2008 | * |
10.16 |  | - | Third Amendment to Real Estate Retention Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2007, by and between Alexander’s, Inc., and Vornado Realty L.P. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.55 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed on February 25, 2008 | * |
10.17 |  | - | Loan Agreement dated as of March 10, 2009 between Alexander’s Rego Park Shopping Center Inc., as Borrower and U.S. Bank National Association, as Lender. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.55 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, filed on May 4, 2009 | * |
10.18 |  | - | Amended and Restated Mortgage, Security Agreement, Fixture Filing and Assignment of Leases and Rentals by and between Alexander’s Rego Shopping Center, Inc. as Borrower and U.S. Bank National Association as Lender, dated as of March 10, 2009. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.56 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, filed on May 4, 2009 | * |
10.19 |  | - | Amended and Restated Promissory Note dated as of March 10, 2009, by Alexander’s Rego Shopping Center Inc., in favor of U.S. Bank National Association. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.57 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, filed on May 4, 2009 | * |
10.20 |  | - | Cash Pledge Agreement dated as of March 10, 2009, executed by Alexander’s Rego Shopping Center Inc. to and for the benefit of U.S. Bank National Association. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.58 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, filed on May 4, 2009 | * |
10.21 |  | - | Lease dated as of February 7, 2005, by and between 731 Office One LLC, as Landlord, and Citibank, N.A., as Tenant. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.59 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, filed on May 4, 2009 | * |
10.22 |  | - | Assignment and Assumption and Consent Agreement, dated as of March 25, 2009, by and between 731 Office One LLC, as Landlord, Citicorp North America, Inc., as Assignor, and Bloomberg L.P., as Assignee. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.60 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, filed on May 4, 2009 | * |
|  |  | __________________ |  |
| * |  | Incorporated by reference. |  |

66

10.23 |  | - | Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Management and Development Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2011, by and between Alexander’s, Inc., the subsidiaries party thereto and Vornado Management Corp. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.49 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, filed on February 27, 2012 | * |
10.24 |  | - | Loan and Security Agreement, dated November 30, 2011, by and between Rego II Borrower LLC, as Borrower, and the Lender. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.50 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, filed on February 27, 2012 | * |
10.25 |  | - | Consolidated, Amended and Restated Promissory Note, dated November 30, 2011, by and between Rego II Borrower LLC, as Maker, and the Lender. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.51 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, filed on February 27, 2012 | * |
10.26 |  | - | Consolidated, Amended and Restated Mortgage, Assignment of Leases and Rents and Security Agreement, dated November 30, 2011, by and between Rego II Borrower LLC, as Mortgagor, and the Mortgagee. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.52 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, filed on February 27, 2012 | * |
10.27 |  | - | Guarantee of Recourse Carveouts, dated November 30, 2011, by Alexander’s, Inc., as Guarantor, to and for the benefit of the Lender. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.53 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, filed on February 27, 2012 | * |
10.28 |  | - | Environmental Indemnity Agreement, dated November 30, 2011, among Rego II Borrower LLC and Alexander’s, Inc., individually or collectively as Indemnitor, in favor of the Lender. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.54 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, filed on February 27, 2012 | * |
10.29 |  | - | First Omnibus Loan Modification and Extension Agreement dated March 12, 2012 by and between Alexander’s Rego Shopping Center, Inc., as Borrower and U.S. Bank National Association, as Lender. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.55 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, filed on May 7, 2012 | * |
10.30 |  | - | Mortgage Modification Agreement dated March 12, 2012 by and between Alexander’s Rego Shopping Center, Inc., as Mortgagor and U.S. Bank National Association, as Mortgagee. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.56 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, filed on May 7, 2012 | * |
10.31 |  | - | First Amendment and Modification of Loan and Security Agreement and Other Loan Documents, dated as of June 20, 2012 by and between Rego II Borrower LLC, as Borrower, and the Lender. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, filed on August 6, 2012 | * |
10.32 |  | - | Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Management and Development Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2012, by and between Alexander’s, Inc., the subsidiaries party thereto and Vornado Management Corp. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012, filed on November 1, 2012 | * |
10.33 |  | - | Contribution Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions, dated as of October 21, 2012, by and between Alexander’s Kings Plaza LLC, Alexander’s of Kings LLC and Kings Parking LLC, and Brooklyn Kings Plaza LLC. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.53 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, filed on February 26, 2013 | * |
|  |  | __________________ |  |
| * |  | Incorporated by reference. |  |

67

10.34 |  | - | Fifth Amendment to Amended and Restated Management and Development Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2012, by and between Alexander’s, Inc., the subsidiaries party thereto and Vornado Management Corp. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.54 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, filed on February 26, 2013 | * |
10.35 |  | - | Second Omnibus Loan Modification and Extension Agreement, dated March 8, 2013, by and between Alexander’s Rego Shopping Center, Inc., as Borrower and U.S. Bank National Association, as Lender. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013, filed on May 6, 2013 | * |
10.36 |  | - | Second Mortgage Modification Agreement, dated March 8, 2013, by and between Alexander’s Rego Shopping Center, Inc., as Mortgator and U.S. Bank National Association, as Mortgagee. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013, filed on May 6, 2013 | * |
10.37 |  | - | Second Amendment and Modification of Loan Agreement and Other Loan Documents and Ratification of Guarantor, dated November 15, 2013, by and between Rego II Borrower LLC, as Borrower, and the Lender. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.60 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed on February 24, 2014 | * |
10.38 |  | - | Partial Release of Mortgage, dated November 15, 2013, by and between Rego II Borrower LLC, as Mortgagor, and the Mortgagee. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.61 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed on February 24, 2014 | * |
10.39 |  | - | Partial Release of Assignment of Leases and Rents, dated November 15, 2013, by and between Rego II Borrower LLC, as Assignor, and the Assignee. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.62 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed on February 24, 2014 | * |
10.40 |  | - | Loan Agreement, date as of February 28, 2014, by and between 731 Office One LLC, as Borrower, and German American Capital Corporation, as Lender. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, filed on May 5, 2014 | * |
10.41 |  | - | Consolidated, Amended and Restated Promissory Note, dated as of February 28, 2014, by and between 731 Office One LLC, as Borrower, and German American Capital Corporation, as Lender. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, filed on May 5, 2014 | * |
10.42 |  | - | Amended and Restated Mortgage, Assignment of Leases and Rents and Security Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2014, by and between 731 Office One LLC, as Mortgagor, and German American Capital Corporation, as Mortgagee. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, filed on May 5, 2014 | * |
10.43 |  | - | Assignment of Leases and Rents dated as of February 28, 2014, by and between 731 Office One LLC, as Assignor, and German American Capital Corporation, as Assignee. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, filed on May 5, 2014 | * |
10.44 |  | - | Guaranty of Recourse Obligations dated as of February 28, 2014, by and between Alexander’s, Inc., as Guarantor, and German American Capital Corporation, as Lender. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.5 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, filed on May 5, 2014 | * |
10.45 |  | - | Environmental Indemnity Agreement dated as of February 28, 2014, by and between 731 Office One LLC, as Indemnitor, and German American Capital Corporation, as Indemnitee. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.6 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, filed on May 5, 2014 | * |
|  |  | __________________ |  |
| * |  | Incorporated by reference. |  |

68

10.46 |  | - | Termination Agreement dated as of February 28, 2014, by and among 731 Office One LLC, Alexander’s Management LLC, Vornado Realty L.P., 731 Office Two LLC, 731 Residential LLC, 731 Commercial LLC, 731 Retail One LLC and 731 Restaurant LLC. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.7 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, filed on May 5, 2014 | * |
10.47 |  | - | Real Estate Sub-Retention Agreement dated as of February 28, 2014, by and between Alexander’s Management LLC, as Agent, and Vornado Realty L.P., as Sub-Agent. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.8 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, filed on May 5, 2014 | * |
10.48 |  | - | Sixth Amendment to Amended and Restated Management and Development Agreement, dated as of March 21, 2014, by and between Alexander’s, Inc., the subsidiaries party thereto and Vornado Management Corp. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.9 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, filed on May 5, 2014 | * |
10.49 |  | - | Rego Park II Residential Management and Development Agreement, dated as of March 21, 2014 by and between Alexander’s of Rego Residential LLC and Vornado Management Corp. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.10 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, filed on May 5, 2014 | * |
10.50 |  | - | Fourth Amendment to Real Estate Retention Agreement, dated December 22, 2014 by and between Alexander’s, Inc. and Vornado Realty, L.P. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.56 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed on February 17, 2015 | * |
10.51 |  | - | Second Amendment to 59th Street Real Estate Retention Agreement, dated December 22, 2014 by and between 731 Retail One LLC, 731 Restaurant LLC, 731 Office Two LLC and Vornado Realty, L.P. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.57 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed on February 17, 2015 | * |
10.52 |  | - | First Amendment to Rego II Real Estate Sub-Rentention Agreement, dated December 22, 2014 by and between Alexander’s, Inc. and Vornado Realty L.P. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.58 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed on February 17, 2015 | * |
10.53 |  | - | First Amendment to Real-Estate Sub-Retention Agreement, dated December 22, 2014 by and between Alexander’s Management LLC and Vornado Realty, L.P. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.59 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed on February 17, 2015 | * |
10.54 |  | - | Third Omnibus Loan Modification and Extension Agreement, dated March 10, 2015, by and between Alexander’s Rego Shopping Center, Inc., as Borrower and U.S. Bank National Association, as Lender. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, filed on May 4, 2015 | * |
10.55 |  | - | Third Mortgage Modification Agreement, dated March 10, 2015, by and between Alexander’s Rego Shopping Center, Inc., as Mortgator and U. S. Bank National Association, as Mortgagee. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, filed on May 4, 2015 | * |
10.56 |  | - | Loan Agreement, dated as of August 5, 2015, by and between 731 Retail One LLC and 731 Commercial LLC, as Borrower, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and Landesbank Baden-Württemberg, New York Branch, as Lenders. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015, filed on November 2, 2015 | * |
10.57 | + | - | Second Amendment of Lease, dated as of the 12th of January 2016 between 731 Office One LLC and Bloomberg L.P. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016, filed on May 2, 2016 | * |
|  |  | __________________ |  |
| * |  | Incorporated by reference. |  |
| + |  | Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission under Rule 24b-2. The omitted confidential material has been filed separately. The location of the redacted confidential information is indicated in the exhibit as “redacted.” |  |

69

10.58 |  | - | Four Omnibus Loan Modification and Extension Agreement, dated and made effective as of March 8, 2016, by and between Alexanders Rego Shopping Center and U.S. Bank National Association. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016, filed on May 2, 2016 | * |
10.59 |  | - | Fourth Mortgage Modification Agreement, dated and made effective as of March 8, 2016, by and between Alexander’s Rego Shopping Center and U.S. Bank National Association. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016, filed on May 2, 2016 | * |
10.60 | ** | - | Form of Alexander’s Inc. 2016 Omnibus Stock Plan Deferred Stock Unit Grant Agreement between the Company and certain employees. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2016, filed on August 1, 2016 | * |
10.61 |  | - | Loan Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2017, between 731 Office One LLC, as Borrower, and Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch and Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. collectively, as Lender. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, filed on July 31, 2017 | * |
10.62 |  | - | Participation and Servicing Agreement for Loan and Security Agreement, dated July 28, 2017, between Bank of China, New York Branch, individually as Lender, Initial A-1 Holder and as the Agent for the Holders, and Alexander’s of Rego Park II Participating Lender LLC, individually as Initial A-2 Holder. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017, filed on October 30, 2017 | * |
12 |  | - | Computation of Ratios | *** |
21 |  | - | Subsidiaries of Registrant | *** |
23 |  | - | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | *** |
31.1 |  | - | Rule 13a-14 (a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer | *** |
31.2 |  | - | Rule 13a-14 (a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer | *** |
32.1 |  | - | Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer | *** |
32.2 |  | - | Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer | *** |
101.INS |  | - | XBRL Instance Document | *** |
101.SCH |  | - | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema | *** |
101.CAL |  | - | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase | *** |
101.DEF |  | - | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase | *** |
101.LAB |  | - | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase | *** |
101.PRE |  | - | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase | *** |
|  |  | __________________ |  |
| * |  | Incorporated by reference. |  |
| ** |  | Management contract or compensatory agreement. |  |
| *** |  | Filed herewith. |  |

70

ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.
71

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

|  |  | ALEXANDER’S, INC. |
|  |  |  | (Registrant) |
| Date: February 12, 2018 | By: |  | /s/ Matthew Iocco |
|  |  |  | Matthew Iocco, Chief Financial Officer |

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

| Signature |  | Title |  | Date
By: | /s/Steven Roth |  | Chairman of the Board of Directors and |  | February 12, 2018
|  | (Steven Roth) |  |  | Chief Executive Officer |  |
|  |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer) |  |
By: | /s/Matthew Iocco |  | Chief Financial Officer |  | February 12, 2018
|  | (Matthew Iocco) |  |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |  |
By: | /s/Thomas R. DiBenedetto |  | Director |  | February 12, 2018
|  | (Thomas R. DiBenedetto) |  |  |  |  |  |
By: | /s/David Mandelbaum |  | Director |  | February 12, 2018
|  | (David Mandelbaum) |  |  |  |  |  |
By: | /s/Wendy Silverstein |  | Director |  | February 12, 2018
|  | (Wendy Silverstein) |  |  |  |  |  |
By: | /s/Arthur Sonnenblick |  | Director |  | February 12, 2018
|  | (Arthur Sonnenblick) |  |  |  |  |  |
By: | /s/Richard R. West |  | Director |  | February 12, 2018
|  | (Richard R. West) |  |  |  |  |  |
By: | /s/Russell B. Wight Jr. |  | Director |  | February 12, 2018
|  | (Russell B. Wight Jr) |  |  |  |  |  |

72