XML 44 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT ﻿
v2.3.0.11

Allowance for Losses and Credit Quality of Financing Receivables | 9 Months Ended
--- | ---
Jun. 30, 2011
Allowance for Losses and Credit Quality of Financing Receivables [Abstract] |
Allowance for Losses and Credit Quality of Financing Receivables | Note M: Allowance for Losses and Credit Quality of Financing Receivables We offer a variety of loan products and credit services to customers who do not have cash resources or access to credit to meet their short-term cash needs. Our customers are considered to be in a higher risk pool with regard to creditworthiness when compared to those of typical financial institutions. As a result, our receivables do not have a credit risk profile that can easily be measured by the normal credit quality indicators used by financial markets. We manage the risk through closely monitoring the performance of the portfolio and through our underwriting process. This process includes review of customer information, such as making a credit reporting agency inquiry, evaluating and verifying income sources and levels, verifying employment and verifying a telephone number where customers may be contacted. For auto title loans, we additionally inspect the automobile, title and reference to market values of used automobiles. As described in Note B, “Significant Accounting Policies,” we consider a signature loan defaulted if it has not been repaid or renewed by the maturity date. If one payment of an installment loan is delinquent, that one payment is considered defaulted. If more than one installment payment is delinquent at any time, the entire installment loan is considered defaulted. Although defaulted loans may be collected later, we charge the loan principal to signature loan bad debt upon default, leaving only active loans in the reported balance. Accrued fees related to defaulted loans reduce fee revenue upon loan default, and increase fee revenue upon collection. Based on historical collection experience, the age of past-due loans and amounts we expect to receive through the sale of repossessed vehicles, we provide an allowance for losses on auto title loans. The accuracy of our allowance estimates is dependent upon several factors, including our ability to predict future default rates based on historical trends and expected future events. We base our estimates on observable trends and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. The following table presents changes in the allowance for credit losses as well as the recorded investment in our financing receivables by portfolio segment for the periods presented (in thousands):
|  | Allowance |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Allowance |  | Financing
|  | Balance at |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Balance at |  | Receivable
|  | Beginning |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | End of |  | at End of
Description |  | of Period |  | Charge-offs |  | Recoveries |  | Provision |  | Period |  | Period
Allowance for losses on signature loans: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Three-months ended June 30, 2011 |  | $ | 1,110 |  |  | $ | (4,747 | ) |  | $ | 1,505 |  |  | $ | 3,796 |  |  | $ | 1,664 |  |  | $ | 13,753 |
Three-months ended June 30, 2010 |  |  | 503 |  |  |  | (3,733 | ) |  |  | 1,240 |  |  |  | 2,719 |  |  |  | 729 |  |  |  | 9,644 |
Nine-months ended June 30, 2011 |  | $ | 750 |  |  | $ | (12,992 | ) |  | $ | 4,575 |  |  | $ | 9,331 |  |  | $ | 1,664 |  |  | $ | 13,753 |
Nine-months ended June 30, 2010 |  |  | 532 |  |  |  | (10,543 | ) |  |  | 4,174 |  |  |  | 6,566 |  |  |  | 729 |  |  |  | 9,644 |
Allowance for losses on auto title loans: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Three-months ended June 30, 2011 |  | $ | 810 |  |  | $ | (2,800 | ) |  | $ | 2,074 |  |  | $ | 489 |  |  | $ | 573 |  |  | $ | 2,921 |
Three-months ended June 30, 2010 |  |  | 811 |  |  |  | (2,197 | ) |  |  | 1,720 |  |  |  | 902 |  |  |  | 1,236 |  |  |  | 4,038 |
Nine-months ended June 30, 2011 |  | $ | 1,137 |  |  | $ | (9,682 | ) |  | $ | 7,646 |  |  | $ | 1,472 |  |  | $ | 573 |  |  | $ | 2,921 |
Nine-months ended June 30, 2010 |  |  | 291 |  |  |  | (5,493 | ) |  |  | 5,022 |  |  |  | 1,416 |  |  |  | 1,236 |  |  |  | 4,038 |
The provision presented in the table above includes only principal and excludes items such non-sufficient funds fees, late fees, repossession fees, auction fees and interest. In addition, all credit service expenses and fees related to loans made by our unaffiliated lenders are excluded, as we do not own the loans made in connection with our credit services and they are not recorded as assets on our balance sheet. Expected losses on credit services are accrued and reported in “Accounts payable and other accrued expenses” on our balance sheets. Auto title loans are our only loans that remain as recorded investments when in delinquent/nonaccrual status. We consider an auto title loan past due if it has not been repaid or renewed by the maturity date. Based on experience, we establish a reserve on all auto title loans. On auto title loans more than 90 days past due, we reserve the percentage we estimate will not be recoverable through auction and reserve 100% of loans for which we have not yet repossessed the underlying collateral. No fees are accrued on any auto title loans more than 90 days past due. The following table presents an aging analysis of past due financing receivables by portfolio segment for the periods presented (in thousands):
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Recorded
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Investment >
|  | Days Past Due |  | Total |  | Current |  | Total Financing |  | 90 Days &
|  | 1-30 |  | 31-60 |  | 61-90 |  | >90 |  | Past Due |  | Receivable |  | Receivable |  | Accruing
June 30, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Auto title loans |  | $ | 575 |  |  | $ | 382 |  |  | $ | 245 |  |  | $ | 285 |  |  | $ | 1,487 |  |  | $ | 1,434 |  |  | $ | 2,921 |  |  | $ | — |
Reserve |  | $ | 93 |  |  | $ | 94 |  |  | $ | 84 |  |  | $ | 252 |  |  | $ | 523 |  |  | $ | 50 |  |  | $ | 573 |  |  | $ | — |
Reserve % |  |  | 16 | % |  |  | 25 | % |  |  | 34 | % |  |  | 88 | % |  |  | 35 | % |  |  | 3 | % |  |  | 20 | % |  |  |  |
June 30, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Auto title loans |  | $ | 543 |  |  | $ | 422 |  |  | $ | 262 |  |  | $ | 949 |  |  | $ | 2,176 |  |  | $ | 1,862 |  |  | $ | 4,038 |  |  | $ | — |
Reserve |  | $ | 109 |  |  | $ | 104 |  |  | $ | 129 |  |  | $ | 778 |  |  | $ | 1,120 |  |  | $ | 116 |  |  | $ | 1,236 |  |  | $ | — |
Reserve % |  |  | 20 | % |  |  | 25 | % |  |  | 49 | % |  |  | 82 | % |  |  | 51 | % |  |  | 6 | % |  |  | 31 | % |  |  |  |
September 30, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Auto title loans |  | $ | 797 |  |  | $ | 552 |  |  | $ | 432 |  |  | $ | 532 |  |  | $ | 2,313 |  |  | $ | 1,970 |  |  | $ | 4,283 |  |  | $ | — |
Reserve |  | $ | 188 |  |  | $ | 229 |  |  | $ | 256 |  |  | $ | 367 |  |  | $ | 1,040 |  |  | $ | 97 |  |  | $ | 1,137 |  |  | $ | — |
Reserve % |  |  | 24 | % |  |  | 41 | % |  |  | 59 | % |  |  | 69 | % |  |  | 45 | % |  |  | 5 | % |  |  | 27 | % |  |  |  |

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for allowance for credit losses. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_AllowanceForCreditLossesTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Details
Name: | us-gaap_ReceivablesAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration