RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS	12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2018
New Accounting Pronouncements and Changes in Accounting Principles [Abstract]
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS	Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Adopted as of December 31, 2018 In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) and subsequently issued clarifications and corrections to the update by issuing ASU 2018-10 in July 2018. This update requires lessees to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet for those leases classified as operating leases under previous authoritative guidance. Upon adoption, the lease liability will be equal to the present value of future lease payments and a right-of-use, or ROU, asset will be based on the lease liability, subject to adjustment for items such as initial direct costs. For income statement purposes, the new standard retains a dual model similar to ASC 840, requiring leases to be classified as either operating or financing. Operating leases will continue to result in straight-line expense while financing leases will result in a front-loaded expense pattern (similar to current accounting guidance by lessees for operating and capital leases, respectively, under ASC 840). There are a number of practical expedients available to the Company at transition. The transition practical expedients are that the Company may elect to not re-assess: (i) whether its contracts contain a lease under the new definition, (ii) the classification of those leases and (iii) the accounting for any initial direct costs previously incurred. In addition, the Company may apply hindsight in determining the lease terms and in assessing a purchase option on its existing leases and any potential impairments that may exist on the ROU assets to be recognized at adoption. The Company may also elect to not recognize an ROU asset and lease liability for those leases with a remaining lease term of 12 months or less. The Company will apply these practical expedients upon adoption. Upon adoption, ROU assets and lease liabilities are being recognized on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The lease liability recognized upon adoption is based upon the present value of the sum of the remaining minimum lease payments (as previously identified under ASC 840) and any amounts probable of being owed under a residual value guarantee (if applicable), to be determined using the discount rate then in effect. The interest rate is based on the Company’s ability to borrow on a collateralized basis over a similar remaining term and in a similar economic environment. The ROU asset to be recorded is based on the lease liability and adjusted for any prepaid or accrued lease payments, the remaining balance of any lease incentives, initial indirect costs and impairments (if applicable). The standard is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2019. The Company elected to adopt the new standard at the beginning of the period of adoption through a cumulative-effect adjustment. The Company will reflect its ROU assets, lease liabilities and any cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings in its consolidated financial statements beginning on January 1, 2019. The Company continues to evaluate the impact of ASU 2016-02 on its consolidated financial statements. The recognition of lease liabilities and corresponding ROU assets is expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. The Company estimates that it will record approximately $35.0 million to $38.0 million of lease liabilities and $26.0 million to $29.0 million of ROU assets as of January 1, 2019, the difference representing previously recorded lease-related assets and liabilities. The Company does not believe the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on its consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity or cash flows. Refer to Note 18, Commitments and Contingencies, for further information on the Company’s existing leases. In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which requires entities to measure all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Entities will now use forward-looking information to better form their credit loss estimates. This update also requires enhanced disclosures to help financial statement users better understand significant estimates and judgments used in estimating credit losses, as well as the credit quality and underwriting standards of an entity’s portfolio. This standard will become effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2016-13 on its consolidated financial statements. In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework. The purpose of the update is to improve the effectiveness of the fair value measurement disclosures that allows for clear communication of information that is most important to the users of financial statements. There were certain required disclosures that have been removed or modified. In addition, the update added the following disclosures: (i) changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income (loss) for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period and (ii) the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. The standard will become effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2018-13 on its consolidated financial statements. In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40: Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That is a Service Contract, which aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. The update provides guidance to determine which implementation costs to capitalize as they relate to the service contract and which costs to expense. In addition, the update further defines the term of the hosting arrangement to include the non-cancelable period of the arrangement plus periods covered by (i) an option to extend the arrangement if the customer is reasonably certain to exercise that option; (ii) an option to terminate the arrangement if the customer is reasonably certain not to exercise the termination option and (iii) an option to extend (or not to terminate) the arrangement in which exercise of the option is in the control of the vendor. Any expense related to the capitalized implementation costs should be recorded in the same financial statement line item in the consolidated statements of operations as the fees associated with the hosting element of the arrangement, and the payments for capitalized implementation costs should be classified in the same manner as payments made for fees associated with the hosting element in the consolidated statements of cash flows. This standard will become effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2020. The amendments may be applied either retrospectively or prospectively to all implementation costs incurred after the date of adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2018-15 on its consolidated financial statements. Other pronouncements issued by the FASB or other authoritative accounting standards groups with future effective dates are either not applicable or not significant to the consolidated financial statements of the Company.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Adopted as of December 31, 2018

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) and subsequently issued clarifications and corrections to the update by issuing ASU 2018-10 in July 2018. This update requires lessees to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet for those leases classified as operating leases under previous authoritative guidance. Upon adoption, the lease liability will be equal to the present value of future lease payments and a right-of-use, or ROU, asset will be based on the lease liability, subject to adjustment for items such as initial direct costs. For income statement purposes, the new standard retains a dual model similar to ASC 840, requiring leases to be classified as either operating or financing. Operating leases will continue to result in straight-line expense while financing leases will result in a front-loaded expense pattern (similar to current accounting guidance by lessees for operating and capital leases, respectively, under ASC 840).

There are a number of practical expedients available to the Company at transition. The transition practical expedients are that the Company may elect to not re-assess: (i) whether its contracts contain a lease under the new definition, (ii) the classification of those leases and (iii) the accounting for any initial direct costs previously incurred. In addition, the Company may apply hindsight in determining the lease terms and in assessing a purchase option on its existing leases and any potential impairments that may exist on the ROU assets to be recognized at adoption. The Company may also elect to not recognize an ROU asset and lease liability for those leases with a remaining lease term of 12 months or less. The Company will apply these practical expedients upon adoption.

Upon adoption, ROU assets and lease liabilities are being recognized on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The lease liability recognized upon adoption is based upon the present value of the sum of the remaining minimum lease payments (as previously identified under ASC 840) and any amounts probable of being owed under a residual value guarantee (if applicable), to be determined using the discount rate then in effect. The interest rate is based on the Company’s ability to borrow on a collateralized basis over a similar remaining term and in a similar economic environment. The ROU asset to be recorded is based on the lease liability and adjusted for any prepaid or accrued lease payments, the remaining balance of any lease incentives, initial indirect costs and impairments (if applicable).

The standard is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2019. The Company elected to adopt the new standard at the beginning of the period of adoption through a cumulative-effect adjustment. The Company will reflect its ROU assets, lease liabilities and any cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings in its consolidated financial statements beginning on January 1, 2019.

The Company continues to evaluate the impact of ASU 2016-02 on its consolidated financial statements. The recognition of lease liabilities and corresponding ROU assets is expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. The Company estimates that it will record approximately $35.0 million to $38.0 million of lease liabilities and $26.0 million to $29.0 million of ROU assets as of January 1, 2019, the difference representing previously recorded lease-related assets and liabilities. The Company does not believe the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on its consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity or cash flows. Refer to Note 18, Commitments and Contingencies, for further information on the Company’s existing leases.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which requires entities to measure all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Entities will now use forward-looking information to better form their credit loss estimates. This update also requires enhanced disclosures to help financial statement users better understand significant estimates and judgments used in estimating credit losses, as well as the credit quality and underwriting standards of an entity’s portfolio. This standard will become effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2016-13 on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework. The purpose of the update is to improve the effectiveness of the fair value measurement disclosures that allows for clear communication of information that is most important to the users of financial statements. There were certain required disclosures that have been removed or modified. In addition, the update added the following disclosures: (i) changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income (loss) for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period and (ii) the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. The standard will become effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2018-13 on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40: Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That is a Service Contract, which aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. The update provides guidance to determine which implementation costs to capitalize as they relate to the service contract and which costs to expense. In addition, the update further defines the term of the hosting arrangement to include the non-cancelable period of the arrangement plus periods covered by (i) an option to extend the arrangement if the customer is reasonably certain to exercise that option; (ii) an option to terminate the arrangement if the customer is reasonably certain not to exercise the termination option and (iii) an option to extend (or not to terminate) the arrangement in which exercise of the option is in the control of the vendor. Any expense related to the capitalized implementation costs should be recorded in the same financial statement line item in the consolidated statements of operations as the fees associated with the hosting element of the arrangement, and the payments for capitalized implementation costs should be classified in the same manner as payments made for fees associated with the hosting element in the consolidated statements of cash flows. This standard will become effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2020. The amendments may be applied either retrospectively or prospectively to all implementation costs incurred after the date of adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2018-15 on its consolidated financial statements.

Other pronouncements issued by the FASB or other authoritative accounting standards groups with future effective dates are either not applicable or not significant to the consolidated financial statements of the Company.