XML 39 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Fair Value Measurement
12 Months Ended
Apr. 29, 2017
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurement
Note 15. Fair Value Measurement

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement, defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  It also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.  The fair value hierarchy within ASC 820 distinguishes between the following three levels of inputs which may be utilized when measuring fair value.

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Observable inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 for the assets or liabilities, either directly or indirectly (for example, quoted market prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets not considered to be active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, or market-corroborated input).

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs supported by little or no market activity based on our own assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities.

The fair values for fixed-rate contracts receivable are estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on interest rates currently being offered for contracts with similar terms to customers with similar credit quality. The carrying amounts reported on our consolidated balance sheets for contracts receivable approximate fair value and have been categorized as a Level 2 fair value measurement.  Fair values for fixed-rate long-term marketing obligations are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation applying interest rates currently being offered for debt with similar terms and underlying collateral.  The total carrying value of long-term marketing obligations as reported on our consolidated balance sheets within other long-term obligations approximates fair value and has been categorized as a Level 2 fair value measurement.

The following table sets forth by Level within the fair value hierarchy our financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis at April 29, 2017 and April 30, 2016 according to the valuation techniques we used to determine their fair values. There have been no transfers of assets or liabilities among the fair value hierarchies presented.
 
Fair Value Measurements
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Balance as of April 29, 2017:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
32,623

 
$

 
$

 
$
32,623

Restricted cash
216

 

 

 
216

Available-for-sale securities:
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
Certificates of deposit

 
12,487

 

 
12,487

U.S. Government securities
400

 

 

 
400

U.S. Government sponsored entities

 
12,238

 

 
12,238

Municipal obligations

 
7,588

 

 
7,588

Derivatives - asset position

 
64

 

 
64

Derivatives - liability position

 
(277
)
 

 
(277
)
Contingent liability

 

 
(1,891
)
 
(1,891
)
 
$
33,239

 
$
32,100

 
$
(1,891
)
 
$
63,448

Balance as of April 30, 2016:
 

 
 

 
 
 
 

Cash and cash equivalents
$
28,328

 
$

 
$

 
$
28,328

Restricted cash
198

 

 

 
198

Available-for-sale securities:
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
Certificates of deposit

 
14,927

 

 
14,927

U.S. Government sponsored entities

 
8,522

 

 
8,522

Municipal obligations

 
1,223

 

 
1,223

Derivatives - liability position

 
(453
)
 

 
(453
)
Contingent liability

 

 
(1,955
)
 
(1,955
)
 
$
28,526

 
$
24,219

 
$
(1,955
)
 
$
50,790



A roll forward of the Level 3 contingent liability, both short and long-term, for the year ended April 29, 2017 is as follows:
Contingent liability as of April 30, 2016
 
$
1,955

Fair value adjustments
 
31

Interest accretion
 
53

Foreign currency translation
 
(148
)
Contingent liability as of April 29, 2017
 
$
1,891



The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument.  There have been no changes in the valuation techniques used by us to value our financial instruments.

Cash and cash equivalents: Consists of cash on hand in bank deposits and highly liquid investments, primarily money market accounts.  The fair value was measured using quoted market prices in active markets.  The carrying amount approximates fair value.

Restricted cash: Consists of cash and cash equivalents held in bank deposit accounts to secure issuances of foreign bank guarantees.  The fair value of restricted cash was measured using quoted market prices in active markets.  The carrying amount approximates fair value.

Certificates of deposit: Consists of time deposit accounts with original maturities of less than three years and various yields.  The fair value of these securities was measured based on valuations observed in less active markets than Level 1 investments from a third-party financial institution.  The carrying amount approximates fair value.

U.S. Government securities:  Consists of U.S. Government treasury bills, notes, and bonds with original maturities of less than three years and various yields. The fair value of these securities was measured using quoted market prices in active markets.

U.S. Government sponsored entities: Consist of Fannie Mae and Federal Home Loan Bank investment grade debt securities trading with sufficient frequency and volume to enable us to obtain pricing information on an ongoing basis.  The fair value of these securities was measured based on valuations observed in less active markets than Level 1 investments.  The contractual maturities of these investments vary from one month to three years.

Municipal obligations: Consist of investment grade municipal bonds trading with sufficient frequency and volume to enable us to obtain pricing information on an ongoing basis.  The contractual maturities of these investments vary from two to three years. The fair value of these bonds was measured based on valuations observed in less active markets than Level 1 investments.

Derivatives – currency forward contracts: Consists of currency forward contracts trading with sufficient frequency and volume to enable us to obtain pricing information on an ongoing basis.  The fair value of these securities was measured based on a valuation from a third-party bank. See "Note 16. Derivative Financial Instruments" for more information regarding our derivatives.

Contingent liability: Consists of the fair value of a liability measured on expected future payments relating to a business acquisition if future financial performance measures are achieved.  The contingent liability was calculated by estimating the discounted present value of expected future payments for estimated performance measure attainment.  To estimate future performance measure attainment, we utilized significant unobservable inputs as of April 29, 2017 and April 30, 2016.  The unobservable inputs included management expectations and forecasts for business performance and an estimated discount rate based on current borrowing interest rates. To the extent that these assumptions changed or actual results differed from these estimates, the fair value of the contingent consideration liabilities could change.  The contingent liability is presented in other long-term obligations in our consolidated balance sheets.
 
Non-recurring measurements: The fair value measurement standard also applies to certain non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.  Certain long-lived assets such as goodwill, intangible assets and property, plant and equipment are measured at fair value in connection with business combinations or when an impairment is recognized and the related assets are written down to fair value.  We did not have any business combinations during the year ended April 29, 2017 and used Level 3 inputs to value the assets and liabilities for business combinations during fiscal 2016. See "Note 4. Business Combinations" for more information. We used Level 3 inputs to measure and record a technology and customer list intangible asset impairment of $830 during fiscal 2017. See "Note 5. Goodwill and Intangible Assets" for more information.

Other measurements using fair value: Some of our financial instruments, such as accounts receivable, long-term receivables, prepaid expense and other assets, costs and earnings in excess of billings and billings in excess of costs, accounts payable, warranty obligations, customer deposits, deferred revenue, and other long-term obligations, are reflected in the balance sheet at carrying value, which approximates fair value due to their short-term nature.