XML 31 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.2
Investments in associates and joint ventures
12 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2020
Investments In Associates and Joint Ventures [Abstract]  
Investments in associates and joint ventures
8.Investments in associates and joint ventures

 

Changes of the Group’s investments in associates and joint ventures for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 were as follows:

 

 

   June 30, 2020   June 30, 2019 
Beginning of the year   35,780    52,177 
Adjustment as of previous periods (IFRS 9 and IAS 28)   (1,979)   (153)
Increase in equity interest in associates and joint ventures   3,342    697 
Capital contributions   2,702    131 
Capital reduction   (106)   (672)
Decrease of interest in associate   -    (7,178)
Deconsolidation (i)   29,176    - 
Share of profit / (loss)   8,667    (7,200)
Currency translation adjustment   53    (404)
Dividends   (1,820)   (1,718)
Other comprehensive income   (1,244)   - 
Reclassification to held-for-sale   (2,070)   - 
Others   (3)   (112)
Incorporation by business combination   1,879    212 
End of the year (ii)   74,377    35,780 

 

(i)See Note 4.
(ii)Includes Ps. (17) and Ps. (8,659) reflecting interests in companies with negative equity as of June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively, which are disclosed in “Provisions” (see Note 19).

 

Below is a detail of the investments and the values of the stake held by the Group in associates and joint ventures for the years ended as of June 30, 2020 and 2019, as well as the Group’s share of the comprehensive results of these companies for the years ended on June 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018:

 

   % ownership interest   Value of Group’s interest in equity   Group’s interest in comprehensive income / (loss) 
Name of the entity  June 30, 2020   June 30, 2019   June 30, 2018   June 30, 2020   June 30, 2019   June 30, 2020   June 30, 2019   June 30, 2018 
Associates                                
New Lipstick   49.96%   49.96%   49.90%   467    (8,659)   7,633    (3,199)   (5,292)
BHSA (1)   29.91%   29.91%   29.91%   4,073    4,451    (380)   (2,411)   416 
Condor (2)   18.89%   18.89%   28.10%   1,481    1,392    120    39    596 
PBEL   45.00%   45.40%   45.40%   -    1,979    -    (117)   416 
Shufersal (4)   26.02%   26.02%   33.56%   28,111    23,013    5,215    297    - 
Mehadrin   N/A    45.41%   45.41%   -    4,845    -    (111)   1,276 
Gav-Yam   34.90%   N/A    N/A    27,277    0,00%   (786)   -    - 
Quality (3)   50.00%   50.00%   50.00%   2,101    1,869    185    (583)   876 
La Rural SA   50.00%   50.00%   50.00%   203    101    102    144    (44)
TGLT   30.50%   N/A    N/A    2,059    -    (116)   -    - 
Other associates and joint ventures   N/A    N/A    N/A    8,605    6,789    (3,253)   (1,663)   1,281 
Total associates and joint ventures                  74,377    35,780    8,720    (7,604)   (475)

 

 

            Latest financial statements issued
Name of the entity  Place of business / Country of incorporation  Main activity  Common shares 1 vote  Share capital (nominal value)  Profit / (loss) for the period  Shareholders’ equity
Associates                  
New Lipstick  U.S.  Real estate  N/A  -  (*) 179  (*) (31)
BHSA (1)  Argentina  Financial  448,689,072  (***) 1,500  (***) (1,272)  (***) 13,186
Condor (2)  EE.UU.  Hotel  2,245,100  (*) 232  (*) (9)  (*) 86
PBEL  India  Real estate  (**) 1  (**) (2)  (**) -  (**) (2)
Shufersal (4)  Israel  Retail  123,917,650  (**) 1,399  (**) 310  (**) 1,930
Mehadrin  Israel  Agropecuaria  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A
Gav-Yam  Israel  Inmobiliaria  639,727  (**) 1,356  (**) 411  (**) 3,496
Quality (3)  Argentina  Real estate  163,039,244  326  370  4,140
La Rural SA  Argentina  Organization of events  714,498  1  224  327
TGLT  Argentina  Real estate  279,502,813  925  (311)  6,004
Other associates and joint ventures        -  N/A  N/A  N/A

 

 

(1)BHSA is a commercial bank of comprehensive services that offers a variety of banking and financial services for individuals, small and medium businesses and large companies. The market price of the share is 17.15 pesos per share. The effect of the treasury shares in the BHSA portfolio is considered for the calculation.
(2)Condor is an investment company focused on US hotels. The price of its shares as of June 30, 2020 is US$ 4.10 per share.
(3)Quality is dedicated to the exploitation of the San Martín property (former property of Nobleza Piccardo S.A.I.C. and F.).
(4)Shufersal is a company that has supermarkets and pharmacies in Israel, the market price of the share is NIS 22,59 as of June 30, 2020.

 

(*)Amounts in millions of US Dollars under USGAAP. Condor’s year-end falls on December 31, so the Group estimates their interest with a three-month lag, including material adjustments, if any.
(**)Amounts in millions of NIS.
(***)The balances as of June 30, 2020 correspond to the Financial Statements of BHSA prepared in accordance with BCRA standards.

 

New Lipstick:

 

On August 7, 2020, as a consequence of negotiations conducted in the context of an increased lease price effective as of May 2020, as set forth in the lease (hereinafter, “Ground Lease”), Metropolitan (a company where IRSA holds, indirectly, a 49.96% interest) executed an agreement with the Ground Lease lessor to conclude the relationship and terminate the ground lease, abandoning the administration of the building. As a consequence of the foregoing, Metropolitan derecognised the liability associated to the ground lease, as well as all assets and liabilities associated to the building and the administration. Pursuant to such agreement, Metropolitan was fully released from liability except for (i) claims for liabilities prior to June 1, 2020, from those persons who performed works or rendered services in the Building or for Metropolitan and (ii) claims from persons who had an accident in the property after August 7, 2020.

 

Gav-Yam

 

Considering that, on June 30, 2020, the market value of Gav-Yam was lower than its carrying value, PBC management considered whether there may be signs of impairment of the investment in such company. Based on the management´s review, with the assistance of external advisors, PBC considered that there was no evidence of investment impairment. Some of the factors considered are listed below:

 

The price of Gav-Yam shares has been significantly volatile since mid-March 2020; therefore, the fact that the market cap of the company was lower than the carrying value as of June 30, 2020 has not been considered as tantamount to a significant or sustained decrease;
On August 4, 2020, Aharon Frenkel purchased approximately 8.6% of Gav-Yam´s capital stock at a value of NIS 2,091/share, which circumstance reinforces the management´s conclusions;
Gav-Yam income as of March 31, 2020 and June 30, 2020 show that Gav-Yam is a stable company with a high quality and wide-ranging client portfolio.

 

Set out below is summarized financial information of the associates and joint ventures considered to be material to the Group:

 

   Current Assets   Non-current Assets   Current Liabilities   Non-current Liabilities   Net assets   % of ownership interest held   Interest in associate and joint venture   Goodwill and others   Book value 
As of 06.30.20                                    
Associates                                    
BHSA   76,869    43,610    102,290    4,629    13,560    29.91%   4,056    17    4,073 
Gav-Yam   41,963    165,878    19,791    117,752    70,298    34.90%   24,534    2,743    27,277 
Shufersal   73,348    187,032    91,899    129,224    39,257    26.02%   10,213    17,898    28,111 
Joint ventures                                             
Quality Invest (ii)   4    5,525    87    1,302    4,140    50.00%   2,070    31    2,101 
As of 06.30.19                                             
Associates                                             
BHSA   87,189    30,774    89,514    15,288    13,161    29.91%   3,936    515    4,451 
PBEL   3,173    853    632    12,128    (8,734)   45.00%   (3,930)   5,909    1,979 
Shufersal   51,741    89,475    54,708    54,794    31,714    26.02%   8,252    14,761    23,013 
Joint ventures                                             
Quality Invest (ii)   25    4,922    119    1,153    3,675    50.00%   1,838    31    1,869 
Mehadrin   11,890    15,318    13,067    3,719    10,422    45.41%   4,733    112    4,845 

 

   Revenues   Net income / (loss)   Total comprehensive income / (loss)   Dividend distribution   Cash of operating activities   Cash of investing activities   Cash of financing activities   Changes in cash and cash equivalents 
As of 06.30.20 (i)                                
Associates                                
BHSA   13,033    (1,272)   (1,272)   -    4,656    37    (3,465)   1,228 
Gav-Yam   11,551    6,765    5,456    3,587    5,086    (5,723)   15,869    15,232 
Shufersal   218,000    5,046    4,500    1,435    21,874    (2,709)   (13,793)   5,372 
Joint ventures                                        
Quality Invest (ii)   18    370    370    -    (89)   -    89    - 
As of 06.30.19 (i)                                        
Associates                                        
BHSA   17,451    879    879    286    167    (70)   (1,922)   (1,825)
PBEL   13    (260)   (319)   -    57    239    (306)   (10)
Shufersal   165,639    3,164    3,147    2,448    4,458    (11,530)   1,396    (5,676)
Joint ventures                                        
Quality Invest (ii)   36    (1,167)   (1,167)   -    (124)   -    124    - 
Mehadrin   17,329    775    819    -    672    (277)   (1,262)   (867)

 

(i)Information under GAAP applicable in the associate and joint ventures´ jurisdiction.
(ii)In March 2011, Quality acquired an industrial plant located in San Martín, Province of Buenos Aires. The facilities are suitable for multiple uses. On January 20, 2015, Quality agreed with the Municipality of San Martin on certain re zoning and other urban planning matters (“the Agreement”) to surrender a non-significant portion of the land and a monetary consideration of Ps. 40 million, payable in two installments of Ps. 20 each, the first of which was actually paid on June 30, 2015. In July 2017, the Agreement was amended as follows: 1) a revised zoning plan must be submitted within 120 days as from the amendment date, and 2) the second installment of the monetary considerations was increased to Ps. 71 million payables in 18 equal monthly installments. On March 8, 2018, it was agreed with the well-known Gehl Study (Denmark) - Urban Quality Consultant - the elaboration of a Master Plan, generating a modern concept of New Urban District of Mixed Uses.

 

BHSA

 

BHSA is subject to certain restrictions on the distribution of profits, as required by BCRA regulations.

 

As of June 30, 2020, BHSA has a remnant of 35.2 million Class C treasury shares of a par value of Ps. 1 received in 2009 as a result of certain financial transactions. The Annual Shareholders’ Meeting decided to allocate 35.1 million of such shares to an employee compensation plan pursuant to Section 67 of Law 26,831. The remaining shares belong to third party holders of Stock Appreciation Rights, who have failed to produce the documentation required for redemption purposes. As of June 30, 2020, considering the effect of such treasury shares, the Group’s interest in BHSA amounts to 29.91%.

 

The Group estimated that the value in use of its investment in BHSA as of June 30, 2020 and 2019 amounted to Ps. 5,933, Ps. 5,521, respectively. The value in use was estimated based on the present value of future business cash flows. The main assumptions used were the following:

 

The Group considered 7 years as the horizon for the projection of BHSA cash flows.
The “Private BADLAR” interest rate was projected based on internal data and information gathered from external advisors.
The projected exchange rate was estimated in accordance with internal data and external information provided by independent consultants.
The discount rate used to discount actual dividend flows was 13.82% in 2020 and 14.37% in 2019.
The sensitivity to a 1% increase in the discount rate would be a reduction in the value in use of Ps. 536 for 2020 and of Ps.503 for 2019.

 

Puerto Retiro (joint venture):

 

At present, this 8.3-hectare plot of land, is affected by a zoning regulation defined as U.P. which prevents the property from being used for any purposes other than strictly port activities.

 

Puerto Retiro was involved in a judicial bankruptcy action brought by the National Government. The current Board of Directors would not be held personally liable with regard to this action. Management and legal counsel of the Company believe that there are sufficient legal and technical arguments to consider that the petition for extension of the bankruptcy case will be dismissed by the court. However, in view of the current status of the action, its result cannot be predicted.

 

Moreover, Tandanor filed a civil action against Puerto Retiro S.A. and the other defendants in the criminal case for violation of Section 174 (5) based on Section 173 (7) of the Criminal Code of Argentina. Such action seeks -on the basis of the nullity of the decree that approved the bidding process involving the Dársena Norte property- the restitution of the property and a reimbursement in favor of Tandanor for all such amounts it has allegedly lost as a result of a suspected fraudulent transaction involving the sale of the property. Puerto Retiro has presented the allegation on the merit of the evidence, highlighting that the current shareholders of Puerto Retiro did not participate in any of the suspected acts in the criminal case since they acquired the shares for consideration and in good faith several years after the facts told in the process. Likewise, it was emphasized that the company Puerto Retiro is foreign to the bidding / privatization carried out for the sale of Tandanor shares. On September 7, 2018, the Oral Federal Criminal Court No. 5 rendered a decision. According to the sentence read by the president of the Court, Puerto Retiro won the preliminary objection of limitation filed in the civil action. However, in the criminal case, where Puerto Retiro is not a party, it was ordered, among other issues, the confiscation (“decomiso”) of the property owned by Puerto Retiro known as Planta I. The grounds of the Court`s judgment were read on November 11, 2018. From that moment, all the parties were able to present the appeals. Given this fact, an extraordinary appeal was filed, which was rejected, and as a result, a complaint was filed for a rejected appeal, which was granted. Consequently, the appeal is under study in the Argentine Supreme Court of Justice.

 

In the criminal action, the claimant reported the violation by Puerto Retiro of the injunction ordered by the criminal court consisting in an order to stay (“prohibición de innovar”) and not to contract with respect to the property disputed in the civil action. As a result of this complaint, the Federal Oral Court No. 5 formed an incident and ordered and executed the closure of the property where the lease agreements were being executed (a heliport and a mooring), in order to enforce compliance with the measure before mentioned. As a result of this circumstance, it was learned that the proceedings were turned over to the Criminal Chamber for the allocation of the court to investigate the possible commission of a crime of disobedience. As of the date of issuance of these financial statements there has been no news about the progress of this cause.

 

Faced with the evolution of the legal cases that affect it and based on the reports of its legal advisors, Puerto Retiro Management has decided to register in fiscal year 2019 an allowance equivalent to 100% of the book value of its investment property, without prejudice to reverse it when a favorable ruling is obtained in the interposed actions.