XML 41 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.20.1

Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries - Fair Value Measurements | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Dec. 31, 2019
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Condensed Financial Statements Captions [Line Items] |
Fair Value Measurements | Note 5 – Fair Value Measurements The Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries have categorized financial assets and financial liabilities that are recorded at fair value into a hierarchy in accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure , ("ASC 820") based on whether the inputs to valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. The fair value hierarchy contains three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value as follows:
Level 1 – | Inputs represent quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities as of the measurement date.
Level 2 – | Inputs, other than those included in Level 1, represent observable measurements for similar instruments in active markets, or identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and observable measurements or market data for instruments with substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
Level 3 – | Inputs represent unobservable measurements, supported by little, if any, market activity, and require considerable assumptions that are significant to the fair value of the asset or liability. Market valuations must often be determined using discounted cash flow methodologies, pricing models or similar techniques based on the Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries' assumptions and best judgment.
The asset or liability's fair value within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Under ASC 820, fair value measurements are determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability in an orderly transaction at the measurement date and under current market conditions. Valuation techniques used maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs and consider assumptions such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions and risk of nonperformance. Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities are reasonable estimates of their fair values because of the short-term nature of these financial instruments. Based on the interest rates for similar financial instruments, the carrying value of the mortgage and other notes receivable is a reasonable estimate of fair value. The estimated fair value of mortgage notes payable was $ 202,772 and $ 319,222 at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The fair value was calculated using Level 2 inputs by discounting future cash flows for mortgage notes payable using estimated market rates at which similar loans would be made currently. Fair Value Measurements on a Nonrecurring Basis The Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries measure the fair value of certain long-lived assets on a nonrecurring basis, through quarterly impairment testing or when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. The Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries consider both quantitative and qualitative factors in its impairment analysis of long-lived assets. Significant quantitative factors include historical and forecasted information for each property such as net operating income ("NOI"), occupancy statistics and sales levels. Significant qualitative factors used include market conditions, age and condition of the property and tenant mix. Due to the significant unobservable estimates and assumptions used in the valuation of long-lived assets that experience impairment, the Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries classify such long-lived assets under Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. Level 3 inputs primarily consist of sales and market data, independent valuations and discounted cash flow models. See below for a description of the estimates and assumptions the Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries used in its impairment analysis. See Note 2 for additional information describing the Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries’ impairment review process. Long-lived Assets Measured at Fair Value in 2019 The following table sets forth information regarding the Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries' assets that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and related impairment charges for the year ended December 31, 2019:
|  |  |  |  |  | Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using |  |  |  |  |
|  | Total |  |  | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |  |  | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |  |  | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |  |  | Total Loss on Impairment |
Long-lived assets |  | $ | 95,300 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 95,300 |  |  | $ | 60,170 |
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries recognized an impairment of $ 60,170 related to two malls.
Impairment Date |  | Property |  | Location |  | Segment Classification |  | Loss on Impairment |  |  | Fair Value |
March |  | Greenbrier Mall (1) |  | Chesapeake, VA |  | Malls |  | $ | 22,770 |  |  | $ | 56,300 |
December |  | Park Plaza Mall (2) |  | Little Rock, AR |  | Malls |  |  | 37,400 |  |  |  | 39,000 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 60,170 |  |  | $ | 95,300 |
(1) | In accordance with the Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries' impairment process, the Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries wrote down the book value of the mall to its estimated fair value of $ 56,300. The mall has experienced a decline of NOI due to store closures and rent reductions. These factors resulted in a reduction of the expected hold period for this asset based on management’s assessment that there was an increased likelihood that the loan secured by the mall may not be successfully restructured or refinanced. Additionally, one anchor was vacant as of the date of impairment. Management determined the fair value of Greenbrier Mall using a discounted cash flow methodology. The discounted cash flow used assumptions including a holding period of ten years, with a sale at the end of the holding period, a capitalization rate of 11.0% and a discount rate 11.5%.
(2) | In accordance with the Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries' impairment process, the Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries wrote down the book value of the mall to its estimated fair value of $ 39,000. The mall has experienced a decline of NOI due to store closures and rent reductions. These factors resulted in a reduction of the expected hold period for this asset based on management’s assessment that there was an increased likelihood that the loan secured by the mall may not be successfully restructured or refinanced. Management determined the fair value of Park Plaza Mall using a discounted cash flow methodology. The discounted cash flow used assumptions including a holding period of ten years, with a sale at the end of the holding period, a capitalization rate of 15.0% and a discount rate 14.0%.
Long-lived Asset Measured at Fair Value in 201 7 The following table sets forth information regarding the Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries' asset that is measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and related impairment charges for the year ended December 31, 2017:
|  |  |  |  |  | Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using |  |  |  |  |
|  | Total |  |  | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |  |  | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |  |  | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |  |  | Total Loss on Impairment |
Long-lived asset |  | $ | 67,300 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 67,300 |  |  | $ | 43,007 |
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries recognized an impairment of $ 43,007 related to one mall.
Impairment Date |  | Property |  | Location |  | Segment Classification |  | Loss on Impairment |  |  | Fair Value |
June |  | Acadiana Mall (1) |  | Lafayette, LA |  | Malls |  | $ | 43,007 |  |  | $ | 67,300 |
(1) | In accordance with the Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries' impairment process, the Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries wrote down the book value of the mall to its estimated fair value of $ 67,300. The mall had experienced declining tenant sales and cash flows as a result of the downturn of the economy in its market area and an anchor announced in the second quarter of 2017 that it would close its store later in 2017. Management determined the fair value of Acadiana Mall using a discounted cash flow methodology. The discounted cash flow used assumptions including a holding period of ten years, with a sale at the end of the holding period, a capitalization rate of 15.5% and a discount rate 15.75%.

X
- Definition Line items represent financial concepts included in a table. These concepts are used to disclose reportable information associated with domain members defined in one or many axes to the table. + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | srt_CondensedFinancialStatementsCaptionsLineItems
Namespace Prefix: | srt_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for the fair value of financial instruments (as defined), including financial assets and financial liabilities (collectively, as defined), and the measurements of those instruments as well as disclosures related to the fair value of non-financial assets and liabilities. Such disclosures about the financial instruments, assets, and liabilities would include: (1) the fair value of the required items together with their carrying amounts (as appropriate); (2) for items for which it is not practicable to estimate fair value, disclosure would include: (a) information pertinent to estimating fair value (including, carrying amount, effective interest rate, and maturity, and (b) the reasons why it is not practicable to estimate fair value; (3) significant concentrations of credit risk including: (a) information about the activity, region, or economic characteristics identifying a concentration, (b) the maximum amount of loss the entity is exposed to based on the gross fair value of the related item, (c) policy for requiring collateral or other security and information as to accessing such collateral or security, and (d) the nature and brief description of such collateral or security; (4) quantitative information about market risks and how such risks are managed; (5) for items measured on both a recurring and nonrecurring basis information regarding the inputs used to develop the fair value measurement; and (6) for items presented in the financial statement for which fair value measurement is elected: (a) information necessary to understand the reasons for the election, (b) discussion of the effect of fair value changes on earnings, (c) a description of [similar groups] items for which the election is made and the relation thereof to the balance sheet, the aggregate carrying value of items included in the balance sheet that are not eligible for the election; (7) all other required (as defined) and desired information. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 820 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=117815213&loc=d3e19207-110258 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_FairValueDisclosuresTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Details
Name: | srt_ConsolidatedEntitiesAxis=srt_GuarantorSubsidiariesMember
Namespace Prefix: |
Data Type: | na
Balance Type: |
Period Type: |