XML 47 R32.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.21.2

Fair Value Measurements (Tables) | 6 Months Ended
--- | ---
Jun. 30, 2021
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract] |
Schedule of Debt Securities, Available-for-sale Measured at Fair Value | The following table sets forth information regarding the Company’s AFS securities that were measured at fair value for the six months ended June 30, 2021
AFS Security |  | Amortized Cost (1) |  |  | Allowance for credit losses (2) |  |  | Total unrealized loss |  |  | Fair value as of June 30, 2021 |
U.S. Treasury securities |  | $ | 183,496 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | (6 | ) |  | $ | 183,490 |
(1) | The U.S. Treasury securities have maturities ranging from July 2021 through September 2021.
(2) | U.S Treasury securities have a long history with no credit losses. Additionally, the Company notes that U.S Treasury securities are explicitly fully guaranteed by a sovereign entity that can print its own currency and that the sovereign entity’s currency is routinely held by central banks and other major financial institutions, is used in international commerce, and commonly viewed as a reserve currency, all of which qualitatively indicate that historical credit loss information should be minimally affected by current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Therefore, the Company did not record expected credit losses for its U.S Treasury securities for the six months ended June 30, 2021.
The following table sets forth information regarding the Company’s AFS securities that were measured at fair value for the year ended December 31, 2020:
AFS Security |  | Amortized Cost |  |  | Allowance for credit losses (1) |  |  | Total unrealized gain |  |  | Fair value as of December 31, 2020 |
U.S. Treasury securities |  | $ | 233,053 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 18 |  |  | $ | 233,071 |
(1) | U.S Treasury securities have a long history with no credit losses. Additionally, the Company notes that U.S Treasury securities are explicitly fully guaranteed by a sovereign entity that can print its own currency and that the sovereign entity’s currency is routinely held by central banks and other major financial institutions, is used in international commerce, and commonly viewed as a reserve currency, all of which qualitatively indicate that historical credit loss information should be minimally affected by current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Therefore, the Company did not record expected credit losses for its U.S Treasury securities for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Schedule of Assets Measured at Fair Value on Nonrecurring Basis | The following table sets forth information regarding the Company's assets that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and related impairment charges for the six months ended June 30, 2021:
|  |  |  |  |  | Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using |  |  |  |  |
|  | Total |  |  | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |  |  | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |  |  | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |  |  | Total Loss on Impairment |
2021: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Long-lived assets |  | $ | 38,500 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 38,500 |  |  | $ | 57,182 |
The following table sets forth information regarding the Company's assets that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and related impairment charges for the six months ended June 30, 2020:
|  |  |  |  |  | Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using |  |  |  |  |
|  | Total |  |  | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |  |  | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |  |  | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |  |  | Total Loss on Impairment |
2020: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Long-lived assets |  | $ | 166,900 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 166,900 |  |  | $ | 146,918 |
Schedule of Impairment on Real Estate Properties | During the six months ended June 30, 2021, the Company recognized impairments of real estate of $57,182 related to three malls.
Impairment Date |  | Property |  | Location |  | Segment Classification |  | Loss on Impairment |  |  | Fair Value |  |
March |  | Eastland Mall (1) |  | Bloomington, IL |  | Malls |  | $ | 13,243 |  |  | $ | 10,700 |  |
March |  | Old Hickory Mall (2) |  | Jackson, TN |  | Malls |  |  | 20,149 |  |  |  | 12,400 |  |
March |  | Stroud Mall (3) |  | Stroudsburg, PA |  | Malls |  |  | 23,790 |  |  |  | 15,400 |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 57,182 |  |  | $ | 38,500 |  |
(1) | In accordance with the Company's quarterly impairment process, the Company wrote down the book value of the mall to its estimated fair value of $10,700. The mall had experienced a decline in cash flows due to store closures and rent reductions. Management determined the fair value of Eastland Mall using a discounted cash flow methodology. The discounted cash flow used assumptions including a holding period of nine years, with a sale at the end of the holding period, a capitalization rate of 14.0% and a discount rate of 15.0%.
(2) | In accordance with the Company's quarterly impairment process, the Company wrote down the book value of the mall to its estimated fair value of $12,400. The mall had experienced a decline in cash flows due to store closures and rent reductions. Management determined the fair value of Old Hickory Mall using a discounted cash flow methodology. The discounted cash flow used assumptions including a holding period of nine years, with a sale at the end of the holding period, a capitalization rate of 13.0% and a discount rate of 14.0%.
(3) | In accordance with the Company's quarterly impairment process, the Company wrote down the book value of the mall to its estimated fair value of $15,400. The mall had experienced a decline in cash flows due to store closures and rent reductions. Management determined the fair value of Stroud Mall using a discounted cash flow methodology. The discounted cash flow used assumptions including a holding period of nine years, with a sale at the end of the holding period, a capitalization rate of 11.75% and a discount rate of 12.5%.
During the six months ended June 30, 2020, the Company recognized impairments of real estate of $146,918 related to three malls:
Impairment Date |  | Property |  | Location |  | Segment Classification |  | Loss on Impairment |  |  | Fair Value |  |
March |  | Burnsville Center (1) |  | Burnsville, MN |  | Malls |  | $ | 26,562 |  |  | $ | 47,300 |  |
March |  | Monroeville Mall (2) |  | Pittsburgh, PA |  | Malls |  |  | 107,082 |  |  |  | 67,000 |  |
June |  | Asheville Mall (3) |  | Asheville, NC |  | Malls |  |  | 13,274 |  |  |  | 52,600 |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 146,918 |  |  | $ | 166,900 |  |
(1) | In accordance with the Company's quarterly impairment process, the Company wrote down the book value of the mall to its estimated fair value of $47,300. The mall had experienced a decline in cash flows due to store closures and rent reductions. These factors resulted in a reduction of the expected hold period for this asset based on Management’s assessment that there was an increased likelihood that the loan secured by the mall may not be successfully restructured or refinanced. Management determined the fair value of Burnsville Center using a discounted cash flow methodology. The discounted cash flow used assumptions including a holding period of ten years, with a sale at the end of the holding period, a capitalization rate of 14.5% and a discount rate of 15.5%.
(2) | In accordance with the Company’s quarterly impairment process, the Company wrote down the book value of the mall to its estimated fair value of $67,000. The mall had experienced a decline in cash flows due to store closures and rent reductions. Management determined the fair value of Monroeville Mall using a discounted cash flow methodology. The discounted cash flow used assumptions including a holding period of ten years, with a sale at the end of the holding period, a capitalization rate of 14.0% and a discount rate of 14.5%.
(3) | In accordance with the Company’s quarterly impairment process, the Company wrote down the book value of the mall to its estimated fair value of $52,600. The mall had experienced a decline in cash flows due to store closures and rent reductions. These factors resulted in a reduction of the expected hold period for this asset based on Management’s assessment that there was an increased likelihood that the loan secured by the mall may not be successfully restructured or refinanced. Management determined the fair value of Asheville Mall using a discounted cash flow methodology. The discounted cash flow used assumptions including a holding period of ten years, with a sale at the end of the holding period, a capitalization rate of 13.25% and a discount rate of 14.0%.

X
- Definition Schedule of Impairment on Real Estate Properties [Table Text Block] + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | cbl_ScheduleofImpairmentonRealEstatePropertiesTableTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | cbl_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition Tabular disclosure of investment in debt security measured at fair value with change in fair value recognized in other comprehensive income (available-for-sale). + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/commonPracticeRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 320 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/topic&trid=2196928 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_DebtSecuritiesAvailableForSaleTableTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition Tabular disclosure of assets and liabilities by class, including financial instruments measured at fair value that are classified in shareholders' equity, if any, that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in periods after initial recognition (for example, impaired assets). Disclosures may include, but are not limited to: (a) the fair value measurements recorded and the reasons for the measurements and (b) the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements are categorized in their entirety (levels 1, 2, 3). + References Reference 1: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 820 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -Subparagraph (b) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=117815213&loc=d3e19207-110258 Reference 2: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 820 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -Subparagraph (bbb) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=117815213&loc=d3e19207-110258 Reference 3: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 820 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -Subparagraph (a) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=117815213&loc=d3e19207-110258 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_FairValueAssetsMeasuredOnNonrecurringBasisTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_FairValueDisclosuresAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration