10-Q 1 a14-14042_110q.htm 10-Q

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIRES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 001-33190

MCEWEN MINING INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Colorado |  | 84-0796160
(State or other jurisdiction of |  | (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) |  | Identification No.)

150 King Street West, Suite 2800, Toronto, Ontario Canada M5H 1J9

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

(866) 441-0690

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer | o |  |  | Accelerated filer | x
Non-accelerated filer | o | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 267,344,048 shares outstanding as of August 4, 2014 (and 30,073,043 exchangeable shares).

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.

FORM 10-Q

Index

Part I FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
Item 1. | Financial Statements | 3
| Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (unaudited) | 3
| Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2014 (unaudited) and December 31, 2013 | 4
| Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (unaudited) | 5
| Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (unaudited) | 6
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) | 7
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 19
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk | 43
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures | 45
Part II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 45
Item 6. | Exhibits | 47
SIGNATURES | 48

2

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (UNAUDITED)

(in thousands, except per share)

|  | Three months ended June 30, |  | Six months ended June 30, |
|  | 2014 |  | 2013 |  | 2014 |  | 2013 |
REVENUE: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Gold and silver sales |  | $ | 11,637 |  | $ | 10,459 |  | $ | 22,767 |  | $ | 23,957 |
|  | 11,637 |  | 10,459 |  | 22,767 |  | 23,957 |
COSTS AND EXPENSES: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Production costs applicable to sales |  | 10,900 |  | 8,278 |  | 19,427 |  | 18,871 |
Mine construction costs |  | 217 |  | — |  | 1,156 |  | — |
Mine development costs |  | 155 |  | 98 |  | 1,723 |  | 569 |
Exploration costs |  | 2,637 |  | 4,889 |  | 5,317 |  | 19,489 |
Property holding costs |  | 734 |  | 316 |  | 2,188 |  | 1,693 |
General and administrative |  | 3,213 |  | 4,217 |  | 6,440 |  | 8,409 |
Depreciation |  | 229 |  | 245 |  | 454 |  | 527 |
Accretion of asset retirement obligation (note 3) |  | 108 |  | 121 |  | 209 |  | 234 |
(Income) loss on investment in Minera Santa Cruz S.A., net of amortization (note 4) |  | 2,438 |  | 1,551 |  | (4,591 | ) | 1,788 |
Impairment of investment in MSC (note 4) |  | — |  | 95,878 |  | — |  | 95,878 |
Impairment of mineral property interests and property and equipment (note 3) |  | 120,398 |  | 27,729 |  | 120,398 |  | 27,729 |
(Gain) loss on sale of assets |  | (18 | ) | 6,791 |  | (18 | ) | 6,791 |
Total costs and expenses |  | 141,011 |  | 150,113 |  | 152,703 |  | 181,978 |
Operating loss |  | (129,374 | ) | (139,654 | ) | (129,936 | ) | (158,021 | )
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Interest income |  | 34 |  | 68 |  | 109 |  | 139 |
Gain on litigation settlement |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 560 |
Unrealized loss on gold and silver bullion |  | — |  | (274 | ) | — |  | (274 | )
Foreign currency gain (loss) |  | 284 |  | (1,226 | ) | (299 | ) | (935 | )
Total other income (expense) |  | 318 |  | (1,432 | ) | (190 | ) | (510 | )
Loss before income taxes |  | (129,056 | ) | (141,086 | ) | (130,126 | ) | (158,531 | )
Income tax recovery (note 8) |  | 25,034 |  | 12,405 |  | 43,991 |  | 18,868 |
Net loss |  | (104,022 | ) | (128,681 | ) | (86,135 | ) | (139,663 | )
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes |  | 2 |  | — |  | 3 |  | — |
Comprehensive loss |  | $ | (104,020 | ) | $ | (128,681 | ) | $ | (86,132 | ) | $ | (139,663 | )
Net loss per share (note 9): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic |  | $ | (0.35 | ) | $ | (0.43 | ) | $ | (0.29 | ) | $ | (0.47 | )
Diluted |  | $ | (0.35 | ) | $ | (0.43 | ) | $ | (0.29 | ) | $ | (0.47 | )
Weighted average common shares outstanding (thousands) (note 9): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic |  | 297,164 |  | 297,097 |  | 297,162 |  | 296,938 |
Diluted |  | 297,164 |  | 297,097 |  | 297,162 |  | 296,938 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands)

|  | June 30, 2014 |  | December 31, 2013 |
|  | (Unaudited) |  |  |
ASSETS |  |  |  |  |
Current assets: |  |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents |  | $ | 15,149 |  | $ | 24,321 |
IVA taxes receivable |  | 14,483 |  | 11,591 |
Inventories (note 2) |  | 10,170 |  | 8,800 |
Other current assets |  | 2,279 |  | 2,059 |
Total current assets |  | 42,081 |  | 46,771 |
Mineral property interests (note 3) |  | 521,884 |  | 642,968 |
Restrictive time deposits for reclamation bonding (note 3) |  | 4,817 |  | 5,183 |
Investment in Minera Santa Cruz S.A. (note 4) |  | 210,425 |  | 212,947 |
Property and equipment, net (note 5) |  | 16,972 |  | 15,143 |
Other assets |  | 91 |  | 54 |
TOTAL ASSETS |  | $ | 796,270 |  | $ | 923,066 |
LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY |  |  |  |  |
Current liabilities: |  |  |  |  |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |  | $ | 12,238 |  | $ | 9,797 |
Current portion of asset retirement obligation (note 3) |  | 1,455 |  | 1,392 |
Total current liabilities |  | 13,693 |  | 11,189 |
Asset retirement obligation, less current portion (note 3) |  | 5,940 |  | 5,855 |
Deferred income tax liability (note 8) |  | 114,864 |  | 158,855 |
Other liabilities |  | 400 |  | 400 |
Total liabilities |  | $ | 134,897 |  | $ | 176,299 |
Shareholders’ equity: |  |  |  |  |
Common stock, no par value, 500,000 shares authorized; Common: 266,597 as of June 30, 2014 and 264,913 shares as of December 31, 2013 issued and outstanding |  |  |  |  |
Exchangeable: 30,623 shares as of June 30, 2014 and 32,246 shares as of December 31, 2013 issued and outstanding |  | 1,355,434 |  | 1,354,696 |
Accumulated deficit |  | (693,769 | ) | (607,634 | )
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |  | (292 | ) | (295 | )
Total shareholders’ equity |  | 661,373 |  | 746,767 |
TOTAL LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY |  | $ | 796,270 |  | $ | 923,066 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED)

(in thousands)

|  | Common Stock |  | Accumulated Other Comprehensive |  | Accumulated |  |  |
|  | Shares |  | Amount |  | (Loss) Income |  | Deficit |  | Total |
Balance, December 31, 2012 |  | 296,025 |  | $ | 1,349,777 |  | $ | (294 | ) | $ | (459,892 | ) | $ | 889,591 |
Stock-based compensation |  | — |  | 686 |  | — |  | — |  | 686 |
Exercise of stock options |  | 48 |  | 95 |  | — |  | — |  | 95 |
Shares issued for litigation settlement |  | 1,000 |  | 3,270 |  | — |  | — |  | 3,270 |
Shares issued for Mexico mining concessions |  | 41 |  | 96 |  | — |  | — |  | 96 |
Net loss |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | (139,663 | ) | (139,663 | )
Balance, June 30, 2013 |  | 297,114 |  | $ | 1,353,924 |  | $ | (294 | ) | $ | (599,555 | ) | $ | 754,075 |
Balance, December 31, 2013 |  | 297,159 |  | $ | 1,354,696 |  | $ | (295 | ) | $ | (607,634 | ) | $ | 746,767 |
Stock-based compensation |  | — |  | 609 |  | — |  | — |  | 609 |
Exercise of stock options |  | 60 |  | 129 |  | — |  | — |  | 129 |
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes |  | — |  | — |  | 3 |  | — |  | 3 |
Net loss |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | (86,135 | ) | (86,135 | )
Balance, June 30, 2014 |  | 297,220 |  | $ | 1,355,434 |  | $ | (292 | ) | $ | (693,769 | ) | $ | 661,373 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

(in thousands)

|  | Six months ended June 30, |
|  | 2014 |  | 2013 |
Cash flows from operating activities: |  |  |  |  |
Cash paid to suppliers and employees |  | $ | (37,085 | ) | $ | (58,521 | )
Cash received from gold and silver sales |  | 22,767 |  | 23,197 |
Dividends received from Minera Santa Cruz S.A. |  | 7,113 |  | — |
Proceeds from sale of gold and silver bullion |  | — |  | 510 |
Interest received |  | 109 |  | 139 |
Cash used in operating activities |  | (7,096 | ) | (34,675 | )
Cash flows from investing activities: |  |  |  |  |
Acquisition of mineral property interests |  | — |  | (150 | )
Additions to property and equipment |  | (2,297 | ) | (225 | )
Decrease to restrictive time deposits for reclamation bonding |  | 367 |  | — |
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment |  | 31 |  | — |
Cash used in investing activities |  | (1,899 | ) | (375 | )
Cash flows from financing activities: |  |  |  |  |
Exercise of stock options |  | 129 |  | 95 |
Cash provided by financing activities |  | 129 |  | 95 |
Effect of exchange rate change on cash and cash equivalents |  | (306 | ) | (1,193 | )
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |  | (9,172 | ) | (36,148 | )
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |  | 24,321 |  | 70,921 |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |  | $ | 15,149 |  | $ | 34,773 |
Reconciliation of net loss to cash used in operating activities: |  |  |  |  |
Net loss |  | $ | (86,135 | ) | $ | (139,663 | )
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) from operating activities: |  |  |  |  |
(Income) loss on investment in Minera Santa Cruz S.A., net of amortization |  | (4,591 | ) | 1,788 |
Impairment of investment in MSC |  | — |  | 95,878 |
Impairment of mineral property interests and property and equipment |  | 120,398 |  | 27,729 |
(Gain) loss on sale of assets |  | (18 | ) | 6,791 |
Income tax recovery |  | (43,991 | ) | (18,868 | )
Gain on litigation settlement |  | — |  | (560 | )
Unrealized loss on gold and silver bullion |  | — |  | 274 |
Stock-based compensation |  | 609 |  | 686 |
Depreciation |  | 454 |  | 527 |
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |  | 209 |  | 234 |
Amortization of mineral property interests and asset retirement obligations |  | 626 |  | 956 |
Foreign exchange loss |  | 306 |  | 1,193 |
Change in non-cash working capital items: |  |  |  |  |
Increase in other assets related to operations |  | (4,516 | ) | (1,534 | )
Increase (decrease) in liabilities related to operations |  | 2,440 |  | (10,616 | )
Dividends received from Minera Santa Cruz S.A. |  | 7,113 |  | — |
Cash used in operating activities |  | $ | (7,096 | ) | $ | (35,185 | )

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
June 30, 2014

NOTE 1 NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation

McEwen Mining Inc. (the “Company” or “McEwen Mining”) was organized under the laws of the State of Colorado on July 24, 1979. Since inception, the Company has been engaged in the exploration for, development of, production and sale of gold and silver. On January 24, 2012, the Company changed its name from US Gold Corporation to McEwen Mining Inc. after the completion of the acquisition of Minera Andes Inc. (“Minera Andes”) by way of a statutory plan of arrangement under the laws of the Province of Alberta, Canada.

The Company operates in Argentina, Mexico, and the United States. It owns a 49% interest in Minera Santa Cruz S.A. (“MSC”), owner and operator of the producing San José mine in Santa Cruz, Argentina, which is controlled by the majority owner of the joint venture, Hochschild Mining plc (‘‘Hochschild’’). It also owns the El Gallo 1 mine in Sinaloa, Mexico, where production resumed in September 2012. In addition to its operating properties, the Company also holds interests in numerous exploration stage properties and projects in Argentina, Mexico and the United States.

The interim consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) has been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures included are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.

In management’s opinion, the unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Consolidated Balance Sheets as at June 30, 2014 (unaudited) and December 31, 2013, the unaudited Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, and the unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, contained herein, reflect all adjustments, consisting solely of normal recurring items, which are necessary for the fair presentation of the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows on a basis consistent with that of the Company’s prior audited consolidated financial statements. However, the results of operations for the interim periods may not be indicative of results to be expected for the full fiscal year. Therefore these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto and summary of significant accounting policies included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. Except as noted below, there have been no material changes in the footnotes from those accompanying the audited consolidated financial statements contained in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit: In July 2013, ASC guidance was issued related to the presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss or a tax credit carryforward exists. The updated guidance requires an entity to net its unrecognized tax benefits against the deferred tax assets for the same jurisdiction’s net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or tax credit carryforwards. A gross presentation will be required only if such carryforwards are not available or would not be used by the entity to settle any additional income taxes resulting from disallowance of the uncertain tax position. The update was effective prospectively for the Company’s fiscal year beginning January 1, 2014. The new guidance affects disclosures only and t he adoption had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

7

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
June 30, 2014

NOTE 1 NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Foreign Currency Matters: In March 2013, ASC guidance was issued related to Foreign Currency Matters to clarify the treatment of cumulative translation adjustments when a parent sells a part or all of its investment in a foreign entity or no longer holds a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a business within a foreign entity. The updated guidance also resolves the diversity in practice for the treatment of business combinations achieved in stages in a foreign entity. The update was effective prospectively for the Company’s fiscal year beginning January 1, 2014. The updated guidance had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Presentation of Financial Statements (ASC 205) and Property, Plant and Equipment (ASC 360) — Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Components of an Entity: In April 2014, ASC guidance was amended to change the requirements for reporting discontinued operations in ASC 205-20. A disposal of a component of an entity or a group of components of an entity is required to be reported in discontinued operations only if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has, or will have, a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results when any of the following occurs: (1) the component of an entity or group of components of an entity meets the criteria in ASC 205-20-45-1E to be classified as held for sale; (2) the component of an entity or group of components of an entity is disposed of by sale; (3) the component of an entity or group of components of an entity is disposed of other than by sale. The update is effective prospectively for the Company’s fiscal year beginning January 1, 2015. The new guidance is not expected to have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606): In May 2014, ASC 606 was issued related to revenue from contracts with customers. Under this guidance, revenue is recognized when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received for those goods or services. The updated standard will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP when it becomes effective and permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. Early adoption is not permitted. The standard will be effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning January 1, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that year. The Company is evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

NOTE 2 INVENTORIES

Inventories at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 consist of the following:

|  | June 30, 2014 |  | December 31, 2013 |
|  | (in thousands) |
Ore on leach pads |  | $ | 4,133 |  | $ | 2,749 |
In-process inventory |  | 3,185 |  | 2,681 |
Stockpiles |  | — |  | 778 |
Precious metals |  | 1,438 |  | 1,300 |
Materials and supplies |  | 1,414 |  | 1,292 |
Inventories |  | $ | 10,170 |  | $ | 8,800 |

8

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
June 30, 2014

NOTE 3 MINERAL PROPERTY INTERESTS AND ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS

Mineral Property Interests

During the second quarter of 2014, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $120.4 million relating to its Los Azules copper exploration project (“Los Azules Project”). The Company conducts a review of potential triggering events for all its mineral projects on a quarterly basis. When events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable, the Company carries out a review and evaluation of its long-lived assets for impairment, in accordance with its accounting policy. Such a triggering event was identified in the second quarter of 2014 with respect to the Company’s Los Azules Project. The triggering event identified was a recently announced acquisition of a copper project located in Argentina, which shares similarities with the Los Azules Project due to its scale, location, and stage of development. Based on the announcement day value of the similar project, the estimated market value per pound of copper equivalent mineralized material from this transaction was below the carrying value per pound of copper equivalent mineralized material of the Los Azules Project, indicating a potential significant decrease in the market price of its Los Azules Project, in accordance with ASC 360-35-21-a, and therefore a requirement to test the Los Azules Project for recoverability. To assist in performing a recoverability test, the Company engaged a third-party valuation firm who used the observed market value per pound of copper equivalent mineralized material based on this recent and other comparable transactions to estimate the fair value of the Los Azules Project. The carrying value of the property exceeded its estimated fair value, resulting in an impairment charge of $120.4 million, along with a resulting deferred income tax recovery of $22.5 million, being recorded in the Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.

Impairments recorded in the second quarter of 2013 related to the Company’s exploration properties in Santa Cruz, Argentina. The impairments were primarily due to an unexpected significant decline in gold and silver market prices, continued inflationary pressures and a new tax on mining reserves in the Province, resulting in a depressed market for exploration properties in Argentina. An impairment charge of $27.7 million, along with a resulting reduction in deferred tax liability and recovery of deferred income taxes of $2.3 million, were included in the Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013.

Based on the above, impairment charges were recorded on the following mineral property interests for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

|  |  |  | Three months ended June 30, |  | Six months ended June 30, |
Name of Property/Complex |  | Segment |  | 2014 |  | 2013 |  | 2014 |  | 2013 |
|  |  |  | (in thousands) |
Telken Tenements |  | Argentina |  | $ | — |  | $ | 13,792 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 13,792 |
Este Tenements |  | Argentina |  | — |  | 2,784 |  | — |  | 2,784 |
Piramides Tenements |  | Argentina |  | — |  | 5,079 |  | — |  | 5,079 |
Tobias Tenements |  | Argentina |  | — |  | 6,074 |  | — |  | 6,074 |
Los Azules Copper Project |  | Argentina |  | 120,398 |  | — |  | 120,398 |  | — |
Total impairments |  |  |  | $ | 120,398 |  | $ | 27,729 |  | $ | 120,398 |  | $ | 27,729 |

Asset Retirement Obligations

The Company is responsible for reclamation of certain past and future disturbances at its properties. The two most significant properties subject to these obligations are the historic Tonkin property in Nevada and the El Gallo 1 mine in Mexico.

The current undiscounted estimate of the reclamation costs for existing disturbances on the Tonkin property to the degree required by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) and the Nevada Department of Environmental Protection (“NDEP”) was $2.7 million as of June 30, 2014. Expenses are expected to be incurred between the years 2014 and 2040. The Company submitted a mine closure plan to the NDEP and BLM for the Tonkin property during the fourth quarter of 2010. As at June 30, 2014, the closure plan has already been approved by the NDEP but is still under review by the BLM pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. It is possible that reclamation plan cost estimates and bonding requirements may increase as a result of this review. The Company, however, is unable to meaningfully estimate possible increases at this time.

9

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
June 30, 2014

NOTE 3 MINERAL PROPERTY INTERESTS AND ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS (Continued)

Asset Retirement Obligations (Continued)

For mineral properties in the United States, the Company maintains required reclamation bonding with various governmental agencies. At December 31, 2013, the Company had cash bonding in place of $5.2 million. During the second quarter of 2014, cash bonding requirements were reduced by $0.4 million, to $4.8 million at June 30, 2014. Subsequent to June 30, 2014, the Company replaced its cash bonding with surety bonds of the same amounts. The annual fees are 1.5% of the value of the surety bonds, with an upfront 10% deposit.

The current undiscounted estimate of the reclamation costs for existing disturbances at the El Gallo 1 mine was $4.6 million as of June 30, 2014. Expenses are expected to be incurred between the years 2014 and 2018. Under Mexican regulations, surety bonding of projected reclamation costs is not required.

A reconciliation of the Company’s asset retirement obligations for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and for the year ended December 31, 2013 are as follows:

|  | Six months ended |  | Year Ended |
|  | June 30, 2014 |  | December 31, 2013 |
|  | (in thousands) |
Asset retirement obligation liability, beginning balance |  | $ | 7,247 |  | $ | 6,359 |
Settlements |  | (18 | ) | (60 | )
Accretion of liability |  | 209 |  | 461 |
Adjustment reflecting updated estimates |  | (42 | ) | 487 |
Asset retirement obligation liability, ending balance |  | $ | 7,396 |  | $ | 7,247 |

As at June 30, 2014, the current portion of the asset retirement obligation was $1.5 million (December 31, 2013 - $1.4 million).

Amortization of Mineral Property Interests and Asset Retirement Costs

The definition of proven and probable reserves is set forth in the SEC Industry Guide 7. If proven and probable reserves exist at the Company’s properties, the relevant capitalized mineral property interests and asset retirement costs are to be charged to expense based on the units of production method and upon commencement of production. Since the Company has not completed feasibility or other studies sufficient to characterize the mineralized material at El Gallo 1 as proven or probable reserves, the amortization of the capitalized mineral property interests and asset retirement costs are charged to expense based on the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the mine. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company recorded $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of amortization expense related to El Gallo 1, which is included in Production Costs Applicable to Sales in the Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, of which $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively, related to the amortization of capitalized asset retirement costs.

10

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
June 30, 2014

NOTE 4 INVESTMENT IN MINERA SANTA CRUZ S.A. (“MSC”) — SAN JOSÉ MINE

The Company’s 49% attributable share of earnings from its investment in MSC was a loss of $2.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014, and income of $4.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014. This compares to losses of $1.6 million and $1.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013. These amounts are net of the amortization of the fair value increments arising from the purchase price allocation and related income tax expense. Included in the income tax expense is the impact of fluctuations in the exchange rate between the Argentine peso and the U.S. dollar on the peso-denominated deferred tax liability associated with the investment in MSC recorded as part of the acquisition of Minera Andes. As a devaluation of the Argentine peso relative to the U.S. dollar results in a recovery of deferred income taxes, the impact has been an increase to the Company’s income from its investment in MSC for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.

During the first quarter of 2013, it was determined that the cost of sales reported by MSC under U.S. GAAP for the year and three months ended December 31, 2012 was understated, resulting in an overstatement of MSC’s after-tax net income of $3.9 million. As the error was not material to previously-reported consolidated financial statements, the correction was recorded in the three months ended March 31, 2013. As a result, the income from the Company’s equity investment of 49% in MSC includes an adjustment of $1.9 million, resulting in a reduction of the Company’s Income from Investment in MSC for the six months ended June 30, 2013.

During the second quarter of 2013, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $95.9 million on its investment in MSC, primarily as a result of an unexpected and significant decline in gold and silver market prices, continued inflationary pressures during the year, and amendments to the Santa Cruz Provincial Tax Code and Provincial Tax Law, which imposed a new tax on mining reserves in the Province of Santa Cruz. As the loss in value of the investment was considered other than temporary, an impairment of $95.9 million was recorded in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013.

During the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company entered into a vend-in agreement with MSC and subsidiaries of Hochschild pursuant to which both parties agreed to contribute to MSC the mining rights of certain Santa Cruz exploration properties. The carrying value of the Company’s properties of $35.9 million, net of the related deferred tax liability of $17.3 million, was transferred to the Company’s investment in MSC, with no gain or loss recognized upon transfer.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company received $3.2 million and $7.1 million in dividends from MSC, respectively, compared to $nil during the same period in 2013. The Company received an additional dividend payment of 8.1 million Argentine pesos in July 2014, equivalent to approximately $1.0 million based on foreign exchange rates at the date of the dividend receipt, and expects another payment of 8.1 million pesos in the third quarter of 2014, equivalent to approximately $1.0 million based on foreign exchange rates as at June 30, 2014.

Changes in the Company’s investment in MSC for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and year ended December 31, 2013 are as follows:

|  | Six months ended |  | Year ended |
|  | June 30, 2014 |  | December 31, 2013 |
|  | (in thousands) |
Investment in MSC, beginning balance |  | $ | 212,947 |  | $ | 273,948 |
Income from equity investment |  | 2,838 |  | 2,126 |
Amortization of fair value increments |  | (6,130 | ) | (18,425 | )
Income tax recovery |  | 7,883 |  | 17,145 |
Dividend distribution |  | (7,113 | ) | (1,826 | )
Impairment of investment in MSC |  | — |  | (95,878 | )
Contribution of Santa Cruz exploration properties, net of tax |  | — |  | 35,857 |
Investment in MSC, ending balance |  | $ | 210,425 |  | $ | 212,947 |

11

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
June 30, 2014

NOTE 4 INVESTMENT IN MINERA SANTA CRUZ S.A. (“MSC”) — SAN JOSÉ MINE (Continued)

A summary of the operating results from MSC for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 is as follows:

|  | Three months ended June 30, |  | Six months ended June 30, |
|  | 2014 |  | 2013 |  | 2014 |  | 2013 |
|  | (in thousands) |  | (in thousands) |
Minera Santa Cruz S.A. (100%) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net sales |  | $ | 53,234 |  | $ | 68,556 |  | $ | 110,123 |  | $ | 112,369 |
Production costs applicable to sales |  | (41,847 | ) | (57,606 | ) | (81,484 | ) | (94,409 | )
(Loss) income from operations before extraordinary items |  | (390 | ) | 124 |  | 5,792 |  | 2,564 |
Net (loss) income |  | (390 | ) | 124 |  | 5,792 |  | 2,564 |
Portion attributable to McEwen Mining Inc. (49%) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net (loss) income |  | $ | (191 | ) | $ | 61 |  | $ | 2,838 |  | $ | 1,256 |
Amortization of fair value increments |  | (3,429 | ) | (6,710 | ) | (6,130 | ) | (12,003 | )
Income tax recovery |  | 1,182 |  | 5,098 |  | 7,883 |  | 8,959 |
(Loss) income on investment in MSC, net of amortization |  | $ | (2,438 | ) | $ | (1,551 | ) | $ | 4,591 |  | $ | (1,788 | )

As at June 30, 2014, MSC had current assets of $100.0 million, total assets of $529.5 million, current liabilities of $48.1 million and total liabilities of $140.0 million on an unaudited basis. These balances include the increase in fair value and amortization of the fair value increments arising from the purchase price allocation and are net of the impairment charge of $95.9 million recorded in the second quarter of 2013. Excluding the fair value increments from the purchase price allocation and the impairment charge recorded in the second quarter of 2013, MSC had current assets of $102.7 million, total assets of $312.7 million, current liabilities of $48.1 million, and total liabilities of $89.2 million as at June 30, 2014.

NOTE 5 PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

As at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, property and equipment consisted of the following:

|  | June 30, 2014 |  | December 31, 2013 |
|  | (in thousands) |
Trucks and trailers |  | $ | 1,012 |  | $ | 1,041 |
Office furniture and equipment |  | 1,756 |  | 1,163 |
Drill rigs |  | 998 |  | 998 |
Building |  | 1,469 |  | 1,469 |
Land |  | 8,699 |  | 8,672 |
Mining equipment |  | 1,409 |  | 1,206 |
Construction-in-progress |  | 5,329 |  | 3,894 |
Subtotal |  | $ | 20,672 |  | $ | 18,443 |
Less: accumulated depreciation |  | (3,700 | ) | (3,300 | )
Total |  | $ | 16,972 |  | $ | 15,143 |

The increase in property and equipment from December 31, 2013 to June 30, 2014 was mainly in relation to construction-in-progress assets, which include advances the Company made to a supplier for long-lead items for its El Gallo 2 project, as well as leasehold improvements as a result of the Company’s relocation of its corporate office.

Depreciation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 was $0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively (2013 - $0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively).

12

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
June 30, 2014

NOTE 6 SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

During the six months ended June 30, 2014, 1.2 million exchangeable shares were converted into common stock. At June 30, 2014, total outstanding exchangeable shares not exchanged and not owned by the Company or its subsidiaries totaled 30.6 million.

During the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company issued approximately 60,300 shares of common stock upon exercise of stock options under the Equity Incentive Plan at a weighted average exercise price of $2.14 per share for proceeds of $0.1 million.

In 2013, the Company entered into an agreement with one of its mining contractors to settle parts of its account payables with shares of common stock of the Company, up to a maximum of 2,500,000 shares. The number of shares to be issued is determined monthly, based on the amount payable by the Company for services rendered above a defined tonnage threshold, using the closing price of the common stock quoted on active markets at the end of every month. As at June 30, 2014, the Company was required to issue a cumulative total of approximately 379,400 common shares under this agreement. The fair value of this liability of $1.1 million is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as at June 30, 2014. Approximately 107,400 shares were issued in July 2014, with the remainder to be issued later in 2014.

NOTE 7 STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, no stock options were granted to employees or directors. For the comparable periods in 2013, the Company granted stock options to certain employees and directors for an aggregate of 1.7 million shares of common stock at an exercise of $2.25 per share. The principal assumptions used in applying the Black-Scholes option pricing model for these awards were as follows:

|  | Three months ended June 30, |  | Six months ended June 30, |
|  | 2014 |  | 2013 |  | 2014 |  | 2013 |
Risk-free interest rate |  | — |  | 0.50 | % | — |  | 0.50 | %
Dividend yield |  | — |  | n/a |  | — |  | n/a |
Volatility factor of the expected market price of common stock |  | — |  | 66 | % | — |  | 66 | %
Weighted-average expected life of option |  | — |  | 3.5 years |  | — |  | 3.5 years |
Weighted-average grant date fair value |  | — |  | $ | 1.01 |  | — |  | $ | 1.01 |

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company recorded stock option expense of $0.2 million and $0.6 million, respectively. This compares to $0.3 million and $0.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013.

NOTE 8 INCOME TAXES

The Company’s income tax expense differs from the amount computed by applying the U.S. federal and state statutory corporate income tax rate of 35% primarily as a result of the tax benefit of losses not being recognized and due to changes in the deferred tax liability associated with mineral property interests acquired with the Minera Andes acquisition. This deferred tax liability is impacted by fluctuations in the foreign exchange rate between the Argentine peso and U.S. dollar. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company recorded an income tax recovery of $2.5 million and $21.4 million, respectively, as a result of the Argentine peso devaluation, compared to $7.5 million and $13.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively. Further, the income tax recovery for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 includes $22.5 million associated with the impairment of the Los Azules Project, discussed in Note 3, Mineral Property Interests and Asset Retirement Obligations. This compares to an income tax recovery of $4.8 million related to mineral property interests sold or impaired in the three and six months ended June 30, 2013.

13

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
June 30, 2014

NOTE 9 INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed similarly except that the weighted average number of common shares is increased to reflect all dilutive instruments.

Below is a reconciliation of the basic and diluted weighted average number of common shares and the computations for basic income (loss) per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:

|  | Three months ended June 30, |  | Six months ended June 30, |
|  | 2014 |  | 2013 |  | 2014 |  | 2013 |
|  | (in thousands, except per share) |
Net loss |  | $ | (104,022 | ) | $ | (128,681 | ) | $ | (86,135 | ) | $ | (139,663 | )
Weighted average number of common shares |  | 297,164 |  | 297,097 |  | 297,162 |  | 296,938 |
Loss per common share |  | $ | (0.35 | ) | $ | (0.43 | ) | $ | (0.29 | ) | $ | (0.47 | )

For the three months ended June 30, 2014, options to purchase 2.0 million shares of common stock outstanding at June 30, 2014 (June 30, 2013 — 3.8 million) at an average exercise price of $5.03 per share (June 30, 2013 — $3.90) were not included in the computation of diluted weighted average shares because their exercise price exceeded the average price of the Company’s common stock for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Other outstanding options to purchase 0.9 million (June 30, 2013 — 0.8 million) shares of common stock were not included in the computation of diluted weighted average shares in the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

For the six months ended June 30, 2014, options to purchase 1.4 million shares of common stock outstanding at June 30, 2014 (June 30, 2013 — 1.6 million) at an average exercise price of $5.96 per share (June 30, 2013 — $5.98) were not included in the computation of diluted weighted average shares because their exercise price exceeded the average price of the Company’s common stock for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Other outstanding options to purchase 1.1 million shares of common stock (June 30, 2013 — 1.0 million) were not included in the computation of diluted weighted average shares in the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

NOTE 10 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company incurred and paid $18,038 and $38,518, respectively, to an entity affiliated with the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer for the use of an aircraft, compared to nil and $70,525 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively.

14

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

June 30, 2014

NOTE 11 SEGMENTED INFORMATION

McEwen Mining is a mining and minerals exploration, development and production company focused on precious metals in Argentina, Mexico and the United States. The Company identifies its reportable segments as those consolidated operations that are currently engaged in the exploration for and production of precious metals. Operations not actively engaged in the exploration for, or production of precious metals, are aggregated at the corporate level for segment reporting purposes.

The financial information relating to the Company’s operating segments as of, and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 is as follows:

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Corporate |  |  |
|  | Argentina |  | Mexico |  | U.S. |  | & Other |  | Total |
|  | (in thousands) |
For the three months ended June 30, 2014 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Gold and silver sales |  | $ | — |  | $ | 11,637 |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 11,637 |
Production costs applicable to sales |  | — |  | (10,900 | ) | — |  | — |  | (10,900 | )
Mine construction costs |  | — |  | (217 | ) | — |  | — |  | (217 | )
Mine development costs |  | — |  | (155 | ) | — |  | — |  | (155 | )
Exploration costs |  | (249 | ) | (1,488 | ) | (831 | ) | (69 | ) | (2,637 | )
Impairment of mineral property interests and property and equipment |  | (120,398 | ) | — |  | — |  | — |  | (120,398 | )
Loss on investment in Minera Santa Cruz S.A. (net of amortization) |  | (2,438 | ) | — |  | — |  | — |  | (2,438 | )
Operating loss |  | (123,817 | ) | (2,150 | ) | (1,025 | ) | (2,382 | ) | (129,374 | )
For the six months ended June 30, 2014 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Gold and silver sales |  | $ | — |  | $ | 22,767 |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 22,767 |
Production costs applicable to sales |  | — |  | (19,427 | ) | — |  | — |  | (19,427 | )
Mine construction costs |  | — |  | (1,156 | ) | — |  | — |  | (1,156 | )
Mine development costs |  | — |  | (1,723 | ) | — |  | — |  | (1,723 | )
Exploration costs |  | (750 | ) | (2,876 | ) | (1,517 | ) | (174 | ) | (5,317 | )
Impairment of mineral property interests and property and equipment |  | (120,398 | ) | — |  | — |  | — |  | (120,398 | )
Income on investment in Minera Santa Cruz S.A. (net of amortization) |  | 4,591 |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 4,591 |
Operating loss |  | (117,559 | ) | (5,198 | ) | (2,454 | ) | (4,725 | ) | (129,936 | )
As at June 30, 2014 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Investment in Minera Santa Cruz S.A. |  | 210,425 |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 210,425 |
Mineral property interests |  | 337,805 |  | 11,341 |  | 172,738 |  | — |  | 521,884 |
Total assets |  | 551,324 |  | 59,649 |  | 176,415 |  | 8,882 |  | 796,270 |

15

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

June 30, 2014

NOTE 11 SEGMENTED INFORMATION (Continued)

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Corporate |  |  |
|  | Argentina |  | Mexico |  | U.S. |  | & Other |  | Total |
|  | (in thousands) |
For the three months ended June 30, 2013 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Gold and silver sales |  | $ | — |  | $ | 10,459 |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 10,459 |
Production costs applicable to sales |  | — |  | (8,278 | ) | — |  | — |  | (8,278 | )
Mine development costs |  | — |  | (98 | ) | — |  | — |  | (98 | )
Exploration costs |  | (2,017 | ) | (1,949 | ) | (870 | ) | (53 | ) | (4,889 | )
Income on investment in Minera Santa Cruz S.A. (net of amortization) |  | (1,551 | ) | — |  | — |  | — |  | (1,551 | )
Impairment of investment in MSC |  | (95,878 | ) | — |  | — |  | — |  | (95,878 | )
Impairment of mineral property interests and property and equipment |  | (27,729 | ) | — |  | — |  | — |  | (27,729 | )
Gain on sale of assets |  | (326 | ) | — |  | (6,468 | ) | 3 |  | (6,791 | )
Operating loss |  | (129,703 | ) | (970 | ) | (6,110 | ) | (2,871 | ) | (139,654 | )
For the six months ended June 30, 2013 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Gold and silver sales |  | $ | — |  | $ | 23,957 |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 23,957 |
Production costs applicable to sales |  | — |  | (18,871 | ) | — |  | — |  | (18,871 | )
Mine development costs |  | — |  | (569 | ) | — |  | — |  | (569 | )
Exploration costs |  | (13,479 | ) | (4,434 | ) | (1,450 | ) | (126 | ) | (19,489 | )
Loss on investment in Minera Santa Cruz S.A. (net of amortization) |  | (1,788 | ) | — |  | — |  | — |  | (1,788 | )
Impairment of investment in MSC |  | (95,878 | ) | — |  | — |  | — |  | (95,878 | )
Impairment of mineral property interests and property and equipment |  | (27,729 | ) | — |  | — |  | — |  | (27,729 | )
Gain on sale of assets |  | (326 | ) | — |  | (6,468 | ) | 3 |  | (6,791 | )
Operating loss |  | (141,615 | ) | (3,020 | ) | (7,055 | ) | (6,331 | ) | (158,021 | )
As at December 31, 2013 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Investment in Minera Santa Cruz S.A. |  | 212,947 |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 212,947 |
Mineral property interests |  | 458,203 |  | 11,984 |  | 172,781 |  | — |  | 642,968 |
Total assets |  | 674,269 |  | 54,131 |  | 177,248 |  | 17,418 |  | 923,066 |

16

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
June 30, 2014

NOTE 12 FAIR VALUE ACCOUNTING

Fair value accounting establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;

Level 2 Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; and

Level 3 Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (supported by little or no market activity).

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis

The following table identifies the fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities as reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 by level within the fair value hierarchy. As required by accounting guidance, assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

|  | Fair Value as at June 30, 2014 |
|  | Total |  | Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3 |
|  | (in thousands) |
Assets: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents |  | $ | 15,149 |  | $ | 15,149 |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |
|  | $ | 15,149 |  | $ | 15,149 |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |
Liabilities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |  | $ | 1,093 |  | $ | 1,093 |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |
|  | $ | 1,093 |  | $ | 1,093 |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |

|  | Fair Value as at December 31, 2013 |
|  | Total |  | Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3 |
|  | (in thousands) |
Assets: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents |  | $ | 24,321 |  | $ | 24,321 |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |
|  | $ | 24,321 |  | $ | 24,321 |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |
Liabilities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |  | 177 |  | 177 |  | — |  | — |
|  | $ | 177 |  | $ | 177 |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |

17

Table of Contents

MCEWEN MINING INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
June 30, 2014

NOTE 12 FAIR VALUE ACCOUNTING (Continued)

The Company’s cash and cash equivalents are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices. The cash equivalent instruments that are valued based on quoted market prices in active markets are primarily money market securities.

As at June 30, 2014, accounts payable included an accrual of $1.1 million for the fair value of approximately 379,400 shares of common stock that are required to be issued as part of the settlement of certain amounts due by the Company to one of its vendors, as discussed in Note 6, Shareholders’ Equity. As the Company’s stock is quoted on an active market, this liability is classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

The fair value of other financial assets and liabilities approximate their carrying values due to their short-term nature and historically negligible credit losses.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis

In the second quarter of 2014, the Company recorded impairment charges related to the Los Azules Project in Argentina, as discussed in Note 3, Mineral Property Interests and Asset Retirement Obligations. The estimated fair value of the Los Azules Project was determined using the observed market value per pound of copper equivalent for recent comparable transactions.

The following table summarizes non-financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as part of the Company’s impairment assessments during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, and for the year ended December 31, 2013.

|  | Date of Fair Value |  | Fair Value Measurements for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 |
|  | Measurement |  | Total |  | Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3 |  | Total Loss |
|  |  |  | (in thousands) |
Mineral property interests |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Los Azules Copper Project |  | June 30, 2014 |  | 310,792 |  | — |  | — |  | 310,792 |  | 120,398 |
|  |  |  | $ | 310,792 |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 310,792 |  | $ | 120,398 |

|  | Date of Fair Value |  | Fair Value Measurements for the Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
|  | Measurement |  | Total |  | Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3 |  | Total Loss |
|  |  |  | (in thousands) |
Mineral property interests |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Telken Tenements |  | June 30, 2013 |  | $ | 26,442 |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 26,442 |  | $ | 13,792 |
Este Tenements |  | June 30, 2013 |  | 5,337 |  | — |  | — |  | 5,337 |  | 2,784 |
Piramides Tenements |  | June 30, 2013 |  | 9,736 |  | — |  | — |  | 9,736 |  | 5,079 |
Tobias Tenements |  | June 30, 2013 |  | 11,645 |  | — |  | — |  | 11,645 |  | 6,074 |
Limo Complex |  | December 31, 2013 |  | 23,438 |  | — |  | — |  | 23,438 |  | 19,450 |
Other United States Properties |  | December 31, 2013 |  | 9,610 |  | — |  | — |  | 9,610 |  | 9,497 |
Investment in MSC |  | June 30, 2013 |  | 176,282 |  | — |  | — |  | 176,282 |  | 95,878 |
|  |  |  | $ | 262,490 |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 262,490 |  | $ | 152,554 |

18

Table of Contents

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

In the following discussion, “McEwen Mining”, the “Company”, “we”, “our”, and “us” refers to McEwen Mining Inc. and as the context requires, its consolidated subsidiaries.

The following discussion updates our plan of operation as of August 6, 2014 for the foreseeable future. It also analyzes our financial condition at June 30, 2014 and compares it to our financial condition at December 31, 2013. Finally, the discussion analyzes our results of our operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and compares those results to the three and six months ended June 30, 2013. With regard to properties or projects that are not in production, we provide some details of our plan of operation. We suggest that you read this discussion in conjunction with MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS contained in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

The discussion also presents certain Non-GAAP financial performance measures, such as earnings from mining operations, adjusted net loss, total cash costs, total cash cost per ounce, all-in sustaining costs, all-in sustaining cost per ounce, all-in costs, all-in cost per ounce, and average realized price per ounce, that are important to management in its evaluation of our operating results and which are used by management to compare our performance to what we perceive to be peer group mining companies and relied on as part of management’s decision-making process. Management believes these measures may also be important to investors in evaluating our performance. For a detailed description of each of the Non-GAAP financial performance measures and certain limitations inherent in such measures, please see the discussion under “Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures” below, beginning on page 35.

Reliability of Information: Minera Santa Cruz S.A. (“MSC”), the owner of the San José mine, is responsible for and has supplied to us all reported results from the San José mine. The financial and technical information contained herein is, with few exceptions as noted, based entirely on information provided to us by MSC. Our joint venture partner, a subsidiary of Hochschild Mining plc, and its affiliates other than MSC do not accept responsibility for the use of project data or the adequacy or accuracy of this information.

19

Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY NOTE TO UNITED STATES INVESTORS — INFORMATION CONCERNING PREPARATION OF RESOURCE AND RESERVE ESTIMATES

We are required to prepare reports under the Canadian Securities Administrators’ National Instrument 43-101 “Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects” (“NI 43-101”), under Canadian securities laws because we are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) and subject to Canadian securities laws. These standards are materially different from the standards generally permitted in reports filed with the SEC.

Definitions of terms under NI 43-101 differ materially from the definitions of those and related terms in Industry Guide 7 (“Guide 7”) promulgated by the SEC. Under U.S. standards, mineralization may not be classified as a “reserve” unless a determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made. Under Guide 7 standards, a “Final” or “Bankable” feasibility or other study is required to report reserves, the three-year historical average precious metals prices are used in any reserve or cash flow analysis to designate reserves and the primary environmental analysis or report must be filed with the appropriate government authority. One consequence of these differences is that “reserves” calculated in accordance with Canadian standards may not be “reserves” under Guide 7 standards. U.S. investors should be aware that McEwen Mining’s properties located in Argentina (with the exception of the San José mine), Mexico and the United States do not have “reserves” as defined by Guide 7 and are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of the disclosed mineralized material will be confirmed or converted into Guide 7 compliant “reserves”.

Under NI 43-101, we report measured, indicated and inferred resources, which are measurements that are generally not permitted in filings made with the SEC. The estimation of measured and indicated resources involve greater uncertainty as to their existence and economic feasibility than the estimation of proven and probable reserves under Guide 7. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that any part of measured or indicated resources will ever be converted into economically mineable reserves. The estimation of inferred resources involves far greater uncertainty as to their existence and economic viability than the estimation of other categories of resources. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of inferred resources will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Therefore, U.S. investors are also cautioned not to assume that all or any part of inferred resources exist, or that they can be mined legally or economically.

Canadian regulations permit the disclosure of resources in terms of “contained ounces” provided that the tonnes and grade for each resource are also disclosed; however, the SEC only permits issuers to report “mineralized material” in tonnage and average grade without reference to contained ounces. Under U.S. regulations, the tonnage and average grade described in our reports, news releases and other various publications would be characterized as mineralized material. We provide such disclosure about our properties to allow a means of comparing our projects to those of other companies in the mining industry, many of which are Canadian and report pursuant to NI 43-101, and to comply with applicable disclosure requirements.

We also note that drill results in one area are not indicative of mineralized material in other areas where we have mining interests. Furthermore, mineralized material identified on our properties does not and may never have demonstrated economic or legal viability.

20

Table of Contents

Overview

McEwen Mining Inc. was organized under the laws of the State of Colorado on July 24, 1979. Since inception, the Company has been engaged in the exploration for, production of, and sale of gold and silver. Our principal assets consists of our 49% interest in the San José mine in Santa Cruz, Argentina; the El Gallo Complex in Sinaloa, Mexico; the Gold Bar Project in Nevada, United States; the Los Azules Project in San Juan, Argentina, and a large portfolio of exploration properties in Argentina, Nevada and Mexico.

In this report, “Au” represents gold; “Ag” represents silver; “oz” represents ounce; “gpt” represents grams per metric tonne; “ft.” represents feet; “m” represents meter; “km” represents kilometer; “sq.” represents square; and C$ refers to Canadian dollars. All of our financial information is reported in United States (U.S.) dollars, unless otherwise noted.

21

Table of Contents

Selected Financial and Operating Results

The following table summarizes selected financial and operating results of our Company for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:

|  | Three months ended June 30, |  | Six months ended June 30, |
|  | 2014 |  | 2013 |  | 2014 |  | 2013 |
|  | (in thousands, unless otherwise indicated) |
Gold and silver sales |  | $ | 11,637 |  | $ | 10,459 |  | $ | 22,767 |  | $ | 23,957 |
(Loss) income on investment in Minera Santa Cruz S.A., net of amortization |  | $ | (2,438 | ) | $ | (1,551 | ) | $ | 4,591 |  | $ | (1,788 | )
Earnings from mining operations (1) (3) |  | $ | 6,639 |  | $ | 7,833 |  | $ | 18,017 |  | $ | 14,843 |
Net loss |  | $ | (104,022 | ) | $ | (128,681 | ) | $ | (86,135 | ) | $ | (139,663 | )
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted |  | $ | (0.35 | ) | $ | (0.43 | ) | $ | (0.29 | ) | $ | (0.47 | )
Adjusted net loss (3) |  | $ | (8,613 | ) | $ | (11,735 | ) | $ | (14,931 | ) | $ | (31,197 | )
Adjusted net loss per common share - basic and diluted (3) |  | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.11 | )
Consolidated gold ounces (1): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Produced |  | 19 |  | 21 |  | 39 |  | 38 |
Sold |  | 19 |  | 24 |  | 39 |  | 38 |
Consolidated silver ounces (1): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Produced |  | 740 |  | 778 |  | 1,465 |  | 1,446 |
Sold |  | 747 |  | 982 |  | 1,480 |  | 1,425 |
Consolidated gold equivalent ounces (1) (2): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Produced |  | 31 |  | 36 |  | 63 |  | 66 |
Sold |  | 32 |  | 42 |  | 63 |  | 65 |
Consolidated average realized price ($/ounce) (1) (3): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Gold |  | $ | 1,278 |  | $ | 1,211 |  | $ | 1,299 |  | $ | 1,357 |
Silver |  | $ | 19.30 |  | $ | 17.76 |  | $ | 19.72 |  | $ | 21.25 |
Consolidated costs per gold equivalent ounce sold ($/ounce) (1) (2): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Total cash costs (3) |  | $ | 840 |  | $ | 744 |  | $ | 815 |  | $ | 817 |
All-in sustaining costs (3) (4) |  | $ | 1,283 |  | $ | 1,111 |  | $ | 1,191 |  | $ | 1,300 |
All-in costs (3) |  | $ | 1,444 |  | $ | 1,202 |  | $ | 1,378 |  | $ | 1,630 |
Silver : gold ratio (2) |  | 60 : 1 |  | 52 : 1 |  | 60 : 1 |  | 52 : 1 |

1. Includes portion attributable to us from our 49% interest in the San José mine.

2. Gold equivalent ounces and costs per gold equivalent ounce for 2014 are calculated using an average silver to gold ratio of 60:1. Prior to 2014, the silver to gold ratio was 52:1.

3. Earnings from mining operations, adjusted net loss, total cash costs, all-in sustaining costs, all-in costs, and average realized prices are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized definition under U.S. GAAP. See “Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures” beginning on page 35 for additional information, including definitions of these terms.

4. In the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company revised its allocation of exploration expenses to all-in sustaining costs. Prior period figures have been adjusted to conform to the current methodology.

22

Table of Contents

Operating and Financial Highlights

· Gold equivalent production in the second quarter of 2014 totaled 31,200 ounces, which includes 23,033 gold equivalent ounces attributable to us from our 49% interest in the San José mine in Argentina, and 8,167 gold equivalent ounces from the El Gallo 1 mine in Mexico.

· Total cash costs, all-in sustaining costs and all-in costs for the second quarter of 2014 for all of our operations on a consolidated basis totaled $840, $1,283 and $1,444 per gold equivalent ounce, respectively. Total cash costs and all-in sustaining costs at the San José mine for the second quarter of 2014 totaled $836 and $1,165 per gold equivalent ounce, respectively. Total cash costs and all-in sustaining cash costs at our El Gallo 1 mine totaled $852 and $1,257 per gold equivalent ounce, respectively.

· Gold equivalent ounces sold in the second quarter of 2014 totaled 31,634 ounces, which includes 22,610 gold equivalent ounces attributable to us from our 49% interest in the San José mine, and 9,024 gold equivalent ounces from El Gallo 1.

· The average realized price for all of our operations on a consolidated basis in the second quarter of 2014 was $1,278 and $19.30 per ounce of gold and silver sold, respectively.

· We reported consolidated net loss of $104.0 million, or $0.35 per share for the second quarter of 2014, compared to $128.7 million, or $0.43 per share for the comparable period in 2013. The net loss for the 2014 period is due in large part to a pre-tax impairment charge of $120.4 million related to the Los Azules Project. We conduct a review of potential triggering events for all our mineral projects on a quarterly basis. When events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable, we carry out a review and evaluation of our long-lived assets for impairment, in accordance with our accounting policy. Such a triggering event was identified in the second quarter of 2014 with respect to the Los Azules Project. The triggering event identified was a recently announced acquisition of a copper project located in Argentina, which shares similarities with the Los Azules Project due to its scale, location, and stage of development. Based on the announcement day value of the similar project, the estimated market value per pound of copper equivalent mineralized material from this transaction was below the carrying value per pound of copper equivalent mineralized material of the Los Azules Project, indicating a potential significant decrease in the market price of the Los Azules Project and therefore a requirement to test the Los Azules Project for recoverability. Based on the results of this impairment assessment, carried out by a third-party valuation firm, we concluded that the carrying value of the property exceeded its estimated fair value, resulting in an impairment charge of $120.4 million, along with a resulting deferred income tax recovery of $22.5 million.

· Removing the impact of the impairment on the Los Azules Project, net of related deferred income taxes, as well as the impact of foreign exchange fluctuations, the adjusted net loss for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 was $8.6 million, compared to $11.7 million for the comparable period in 2013.

· Earnings from mining operations for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 were $6.6 million, compared to $7.8 million for the comparable period in 2013.

· We ended the quarter with $16.6 million in cash and precious metals and no bank debt.

Development and Exploration Activities

El Gallo, Sinaloa, Mexico

El Gallo 1

We completed the construction of the expansion of El Gallo 1 in order to increase capacity from a nominal 3,000 tonnes per day to 4,500 tonnes per day in April 2014. Commissioning has commenced, with the expansion expected to be fully operational during the fourth quarter of 2014. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, we spent $0.2 million and $1.2 million on the expansion, respectively, for a total of $2.5 million spent to that date on the expansion.

23

Table of Contents

El Gallo 2

A final decision to proceed with the construction of El Gallo 2 has not been made. Any decision to proceed would be based on silver price expectations and securing financing on terms that are more favorable than those that were available to us at the time of filing this report. In order to prepare for a possible construction decision later this year, we have been evaluating possible debt financing alternatives and advancing the construction of the ball mill, which is the longest lead time item associated with the mine. The ball mill is 75% complete and would be ready for delivery in the fourth quarter of 2014. We disbursed an additional $1.4 million for the ball mill in the second quarter of 2014, and expect to disburse an additional $1.0 million for the ball mill in the third quarter of 2014.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, we spent $0.2 million and $1.7 million, respectively, on mine development costs, which includes $1.4 million for the Land Use Change permit in January 2014.

One of the two additional permits associated with El Gallo 2 was submitted in the second quarter of 2014. This permit would allow the mining of a satellite deposit, Palmarito. This deposit represents approximately 15% of the projected annual silver production at El Gallo 2. We expect a decision on this permit in the fourth quarter of 2014. The second and final permit is for a right-of-way that will connect the El Gallo 2 operation to the Mexican power grid, and is expected to be submitted in the third quarter of 2014. However, construction of the mine could begin with power provided by generators with the option of later connecting to the grid. Neither the Palmarito or the power line right-of-way permit will prevent construction from proceeding.

Based on on-going cost savings studies, we believe approximately $150 million in financing would be required in order to complete the mine. The El Gallo 2 feasibility study has not been updated to reflect these possible changes.

24

Table of Contents

Exploration

El Gallo, Sinaloa, Mexico

Currently, one core drill is operating in the El Gallo 1 region. A first phase of drilling was completed on a target in the immediate El Gallo 1 mine area called Veta Nueva with the goal of expanding the existing resource. In addition, infill and extensional drilling is taking place at San Jose del Alamo, a satellite deposit located about 14 km north of El Gallo 1. Future plans include additional drilling at Twin Domes, another satellite deposit located 11 miles (17 km) west of El Gallo 1.

Gold Bar Project, Nevada, U.S.

Gold Bar is located primarily on public lands managed by the BLM. We submitted our Plan of Operations (“POO”) permit application during the fourth quarter of 2013. The POO was determined complete and the BLM has determined that an Environmental Impact Statement (“EIS”) is necessary to fulfill the requirements under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”). Upon completion of the EIS, the BLM will be able to proceed with the approval determination of the POO.

A Request for Proposal has been issued to select a third-party contractor to assist the BLM in the preparation of an EIS for the Gold Bar project. Final permit approval is scheduled for first quarter of 2016.

Expenditures for the remainder of 2014 are expected to be approximately $0.8 million.

South Roberts Project, Nevada, U.S.

During the first quarter of 2014, we entered into a Joint Venture Agreement (“JVA”) with partner, Kinetic Gold Inc. (“Kinetic”) for the South Roberts project in Nevada. South Roberts is located in the Cortez trend 10 miles (16 km) south-east of the Gold Bar deposit and has never been drilled. Recent and historical geochemical work had identified a number of potential near surface targets. Drilling has begun on this project. Pursuant to our obligations under the JVA, we completed a four-hole drill program in the second quarter totaling 4,560 ft. (1,390 m) of reverse-circulation drilling with no significant results. We will continue to evaluate this property and are planning additional exploration work in the third quarter at an estimated cost of approximately $0.4 million.

Los Azules Copper Project, Argentina

The 2013-2014 exploration season started in December 2013 and was completed in March 2014. We completed baseline studies regarding flora, fauna, water quality and glaciers. No significant exploration work was conducted during this 2013-2014 season. Expenditures for the remainder of 2014 for the Los Azules Project are budgeted to be approximately $0.7 million.

Santa Cruz Exploration, Argentina

We are continuing with our review of our 100% owned properties in the province of Santa Cruz, Argentina with sampling and mapping taking place. We do not expect to complete any significant drilling in 2014. Expenditures for the remainder of 2014 for the Santa Cruz properties are budgeted to be approximately $0.1 million.

25

Table of Contents

Results of Operations — MSC (on a 100% basis)

Overview

The following discussion relates only to MSC and is disclosed on a 100% basis, of which we indirectly own 49%. We account for our investment in MSC using the equity method. MSC, the entity which owns and operates the San José mine, is responsible for and has supplied to us all reported results and operational updates from the San José mine.

The following table sets out production totals, sales totals, total cash costs and all-in sustaining costs (on a co-product and gold equivalent basis) for the San José mine for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. Also included below are the production figures on a 49% attributable basis.

San José Mine Operating Results (100%)

|  | Three months ended June 30, |  | Six months ended June 30, |
|  | 2014 |  | 2013 |  | 2014 |  | 2013 |
|  | (in thousands, unless otherwise indicated) |
San José Mine - 100% |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Tonnes of ore mined |  | 136 |  | 144 |  | 241 |  | 252 |
Average grade (gpt): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Gold |  | 5.92 |  | 6.33 |  | 6.26 |  | 6.20 |
Silver |  | 425 |  | 459 |  | 434 |  | 451 |
Tonnes of ore processed |  | 142 |  | 141 |  | 277 |  | 249 |
Average grade (gpt): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Gold |  | 5.48 |  | 6.34 |  | 5.60 |  | 6.57 |
Silver |  | 378 |  | 407 |  | 385 |  | 430 |
Average recovery (%): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Gold |  | 87.6 |  | 89.3 |  | 88.1 |  | 88.7 |
Silver |  | 87.1 |  | 85.5 |  | 87.0 |  | 85.0 |
Gold ounces: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Produced |  | 22 |  | 26 |  | 44 |  | 47 |
Sold |  | 21 |  | 32 |  | 43 |  | 45 |
Silver ounces: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Produced |  | 1,504 |  | 1,575 |  | 2,975 |  | 2,926 |
Sold |  | 1,511 |  | 1,991 |  | 3,004 |  | 2,880 |
Gold equivalent ounces (1) : |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Produced |  | 47 |  | 56 |  | 93 |  | 103 |
Sold |  | 46 |  | 70 |  | 93 |  | 100 |
Net sales |  | $ | 53,234 |  | $ | 68,555 |  | $ | 110,123 |  | $ | 112,368 |
Gross average realized price ($/ounce) (2) : |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Gold |  | $ | 1,268 |  | $ | 1,162 |  | $ | 1,303 |  | $ | 1,269 |
Silver |  | $ | 19.30 |  | $ | 17.74 |  | $ | 19.72 |  | $ | 21.21 |
Total cash costs (2) |  | $ | 38,561 |  | $ | 52,758 |  | $ | 77,036 |  | $ | 84,328 |
Total cash costs per ounce sold ($/ounce) (2): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Gold |  | $ | 889 |  | $ | 878 |  | $ | 881 |  | $ | 936 |
Silver |  | $ | 13.19 |  | $ | 12.40 |  | $ | 12.96 |  | $ | 14.73 |
Gold equivalent (1) |  | $ | 836 |  | $ | 751 |  | $ | 826 |  | $ | 842 |
All-in sustaining costs (2) |  | $ | 53,740 |  | $ | 68,327 |  | $ | 100,538 |  | $ | 113,269 |
All-in sustaining costs per ounce sold ($/ounce) (2): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Gold |  | $ | 1,239 |  | $ | 1,137 |  | $ | 1,149 |  | $ | 1,257 |
Silver |  | $ | 18.38 |  | $ | 16.06 |  | $ | 16.92 |  | $ | 19.79 |
Gold equivalent (1) |  | $ | 1,165 |  | $ | 972 |  | $ | 1,077 |  | $ | 1,131 |
Silver : gold ratio (1) |  | 60 : 1 |  | 52 : 1 |  | 60 : 1 |  | 52 : 1 |
McEwen Mining - 49% attributable share |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Ounces produced: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Gold |  | 11 |  | 13 |  | 22 |  | 23 |
Silver |  | 737 |  | 772 |  | 1,458 |  | 1,434 |
Gold equivalent (1) |  | 23 |  | 27 |  | 46 |  | 50 |

(1) Gold equivalent ounces and costs per gold equivalent ounce for 2014 are calculated using an average silver to gold ratio of 60:1. Prior to 2014, the silver to gold ratio was 52:1.

(2) Total cash costs, all-in sustaining costs and average realized prices are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized definition under U.S. GAAP. See “Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures” beginning on page 35 for additional information, including definitions of these terms.

26

Table of Contents

Production

Gold production for the three months ended June 30, 2014 decreased by 14% to 21,938 ounces and silver production by 5% to 1,504,084 ounces of silver, from 25,610 ounces of gold and 1,575,442 ounces of silver in the same period in 2013. Production during the second quarter of 2014 was lower than in 2013 due to a decrease in gold and silver grades, of 14% and 7%, respectively, which was partly offset by a slight increase in the number of tonnes processed.

For the six months ended June 30, 2014, gold production decreased by 6% to 43,912 ounces while silver production increased by 2% to 2,975,165 ounces, compared to 2013. Both grades were lower in the first half of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013, with a decrease of 15% and 10% for gold and silver, respectively. The impact of the lower grades was partly offset by an increase of 11% in tonnes processed, as a result of the expansion in mill throughput capacity which was commissioned at the beginning of 2013. In addition to the increased mill capacity, tonnes processed were higher in 2014 than in 2013 due to fewer days of labour interruptions. In the first quarter of 2013, mining activities were affected by a ten-day stoppage following an outbreak of a food-transmitted illness. Comparatively, labour interruptions at the mine in the first half of 2014 totaled only three days, due to employee travel being affected by a national strike throughout Argentina.

Sales

For the three months ended June 30, 2014, net sales realized by MSC from the sale of gold and silver decreased by 22% to $53.2 million compared to $68.5 million for the same period in 2013. The decrease was a result of fewer ounces sold, partly offset by higher average realized prices. Sales volumes in the quarter were 20,954 ounces of gold and 1,511,314 ounces of silver in the second quarter of 2014, compared to 31,974 ounces of gold and 1,991,030 ounces of silver in the comparable period in 2013. Sales in the second quarter of 2013 were unusually high due to a build up of inventory in the preceding quarter.

The average gross sale price for gold sold, after mark-to-market provisional price adjustments, in the second quarter of 2014 was $1,268 per ounce, an increase of 9% compared to $1,162 per ounce received in the same period in 2013. In comparison, the average London P.M. fix price for gold during the second quarter of 2014 was $1,288 per ounce, compared to $1,415 per ounce for the same period in 2013.

The average gross sale price for silver sold, after mark-to-market provisional price adjustments, in the second quarter of 2014 was $19.30 per ounce, an increase of 9% compared to an average $17.74 per ounce received in the same period in 2013. In comparison, the average London P.M. fix price for silver during the second quarter of 2014 was $19.62 per ounce during the second quarter of 2014, compared to $23.14 per ounce for the same period in 2013.

For the six months ended June 30, 2014, net sales realized by MSC from the sale of gold and silver were slightly lower than in the comparable period in 2013, totaling $110.1 million compared to $112.4 million. Despite an increase in ounces of silver sold and higher average realized gold prices, net sales in the first half of 2014 decreased primarily due to lower average realized silver prices and lower ounces of gold sold. Gold ounces sold decreased by 3%, while silver ounces sold increased by 4% in the 2014 period compared to 2013. Average realized price of gold ounces sold in the six months ended June 30, 2014 increased by 3%, while average realized price of silver sold decreased by 7%.

The difference between the average gross realized sale price per ounce of gold and silver sold by MSC and the average London fix prices noted above is due to negative adjustments of provisionally priced shipments of concentrates as a result of the downward trend of gold and silver prices during 2013. Sales revenue on provisionally priced sales of concentrates is recognized based on estimates of the final pricing receivable based on relevant forward market prices. At each reporting date, provisionally priced metal is marked to market based on the forward selling price for the quotational period of the sales contract.

27

Table of Contents

Total Cash Costs and All-In Sustaining Costs

Total cash costs for the San José mine per gold equivalent ounce sold for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 were $836 per gold equivalent ounce sold based on a 60:1 ratio, compared to $751 per gold equivalent ounce sold for the same period in 2013 based on a silver to gold ratio of 52:1, or $810 based on a 60:1 ratio. On a co-product basis (gold and silver), total cash cost for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 were $889 per ounce of gold and $13.19 per ounce of silver, compared to $878 per ounce of gold and $12.40 per ounce of silver for the same period in 2013. The increase in total cash costs is primarily a reflection of lower gold and silver grades of ore processed in the 2014 period, as well as continuing high inflationary pressures in Argentina which have generally led to rising operating costs. An increase in ground support costs in the mine in response to less favourable ground conditions also contributed to higher cash costs for the quarter.

All-in sustaining cash costs for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 were $1,165 per gold equivalent ounce based on a 60:1 ratio, compared to $972 per gold equivalent ounce in the same period in 2013 based on a silver to gold ratio of 52: 1, or $1,049 based on a 60:1 ratio. On a co-product basis, all-in sustaining costs were $1,239 per ounce of gold and $18.38 per ounce of silver, compared to $1,137 per ounce of gold and $16.06 per ounce of silver for the same period in 2013. The increase in all-in sustaining costs was also due to lower silver and gold grades. Further, all-in sustaining costs on a per ounce basis were lower in 2013 than in 2014 due to a significantly higher number of ounces sold, therefore resulting in a lower cost per ounce. Sales in the second quarter of 2013 were unusually high due to a build up of inventory in the preceding quarter.

For the six months ended June 30, 2014, total cash costs per gold equivalent ounce were $826 based on a 60:1 ratio, compared to $842 based on a silver to gold ratio of 52:1, or $909 based on a silver to gold ratio of 60:1. All-in sustaining costs were $1,077 per gold equivalent ounce for the first half of 2014 based on a 60:1 ratio, compared to $1,131 in 2013 based on a silver to gold ratio of 52:1, or $1,221 based on a silver to gold ratio of 60:1. On a year-to-date basis, the impact of lower grades and general inflationary pressures discussed above were offset by the effect of a sharp devaluation of the Argentine peso in the month of January 2014, resulting in a net decrease in operating costs for the six months ended June 30, 2014.

Investment in MSC

The Company’s 49% attributable share of earnings from its investment in MSC was a loss of $2.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014, and income of $4.6 million for six months ended June 30, 2014. This compares to a loss of $1.6 million and $1.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013. These amounts are net of the amortization of the fair value increments arising from the purchase price allocation and related income tax expense. Included in the income tax expense is the impact of fluctuations in the exchange rate between the Argentine peso and the U.S. dollar on the peso-denominated deferred tax liability associated with the investment in MSC recorded as part of the acquisition of Minera Andes. As a devaluation of the Argentine peso relative to the U.S. dollar results in a recovery of deferred income taxes, the impact has been an increase to the Company’s income from its investment in MSC for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company received $3.2 million and $7.1 million in dividends from MSC, respectively, compared to $nil during the same periods in 2013. The Company received an additional dividend payment of 8.1 million Argentine pesos in July 2014, equivalent to approximately $1.0 million based on foreign exchange rates at the date of the dividend receipt, and expects another payment of 8.1 million Argentine peso in the third quarter of 2014, equivalent to approximately $1.0 million based on foreign exchange rates as at June 30, 2014.

Exploration

In the second quarter of 2014, exploration work at the San José mine included mapping of the Coyi, Nueva Ramona and Rubia veins which identified additional corridors (located to the south of the known resources) which are expected to be explored during future drilling campaigns. In addition, further structures have been identified in the Sigmoide sector (located to the north east of the known resources). Exploration work has also been done to the south east of the mine property in the El Retiro zone.

28

Table of Contents

Results of Operations — El Gallo 1

Overview

The following table sets out production totals, sales totals, total cash costs, and all-in sustaining cash costs (on a gold equivalent basis) for the El Gallo 1 mine for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:

El Gallo 1 Mine Operating Results (100%)

|  | Three months ended June 30, |  | Six months ended June 30, |
|  | 2014 |  | 2013 |  | 2014 |  | 2013 |
|  | (in thousands, unless otherwise indicated) |
Tonnes of ore mined |  | 328 |  | 354 |  | 651 |  | 623 |
Average grade gold (gpt) |  | 1.06 |  | 1.46 |  | 1.10 |  | 1.30 |
Tonnes of ore processed |  | 368 |  | 347 |  | 728 |  | 642 |
Average grade gold (gpt) |  | 1.10 |  | 1.34 |  | 1.13 |  | 1.23 |
Gold ounces: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Produced |  | 8.1 |  | 8.4 |  | 17.4 |  | 15.1 |
Sold |  | 8.9 |  | 7.9 |  | 17.5 |  | 16.0 |
Silver ounces: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Produced |  | 3.3 |  | 6.3 |  | 7.5 |  | 12.0 |
Sold |  | 6.8 |  | 6.4 |  | 8.4 |  | 14.2 |
Gold equivalent ounces (1) : |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Produced |  | 8.2 |  | 8.6 |  | 17.5 |  | 15.3 |
Sold |  | 9.0 |  | 8.0 |  | 17.6 |  | 16.2 |
Net sales |  | $ | 11,637 |  | $ | 10,459 |  | $ | 22,767 |  | $ | 23,957 |
Average realized price ($/ounce) (2) : |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Gold |  | $ | 1,291 |  | $ | 1,308 |  | $ | 1,293 |  | $ | 1,476 |
Silver |  | $ | 19.58 |  | $ | 19.71 |  | $ | 19.71 |  | $ | 25.39 |
Total cash costs (2) |  | $ | 7,691 |  | $ | 5,718 |  | $ | 13,875 |  | $ | 12,063 |
Total cash cost per gold equivalent ounce sold ($/ounce) (1) (2) (3) |  | $ | 852 |  | $ | 713 |  | $ | 788 |  | $ | 742 |
All-in sustaining costs (2) (3) |  | $ | 11,346 |  | $ | 9,634 |  | $ | 20,331 |  | $ | 21,401 |
All-in sustaining cost per gold equivalent ounce sold ($/ounce) (1) (2) (3) |  | $ | 1,257 |  | $ | 1,201 |  | $ | 1,154 |  | $ | 1,317 |
Silver : gold ratio (1) |  | 60 : 1 |  | 52 : 1 |  | 60 : 1 |  | 52 : 1 |

(1) Gold equivalent ounces for 2014 are calculated using an average silver to gold ratio of 60: 1, as determined in our 2014 budget. Prior to 2014, the silver to gold ratio was 52: 1.

(2) Total cash costs, all-in sustaining costs and average realized prices are non-GAAP financial performance measures with no standardized definition under U.S. GAAP. See “Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures”, beginning on page 35 for additional information, including definitions of these terms.

(3) In the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company revised its allocation of exploration expenses to all-in sustaining costs. Prior period figures have been adjusted to conform to the current methodology.

29

Table of Contents

Production

Production at El Gallo 1 for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 decreased by 5% to 8,167 gold equivalent ounces, from 8,561 gold equivalent ounces in the comparable period in 2013. The decrease is primarily a result of lower grades, from an average 1.34 g/t for the second quarter of 2013 to an average 1.10 g/t in 2014, a decrease of 18%, partly offset by a 6% increase in tonnes processed attributable to the higher crusher capacity from the ongoing El Gallo 1 expansion. While tonnes processed increased year-over-year, tonnes mined decreased by 7% compared to 2013. Mining activities were impacted by heavy rains from an earlier than normal onset of the rainy season.

Tonnes mined represent tonnes of ore extracted, while tonnes processed represent tonnes of ore crushed and placed on the leach pads. The difference between tonnes mined of 327,781 and tonnes processed of 368,223 was due to ore crushed from stock pile inventories. Due to long process cycles, actual recoveries from the heap are difficult to measure and may fluctuate significantly based on the timing, quantity and metallurgical attributes of new mineralized material placed on the leach pads, amongst other variables. The cumulative recovery rate for gold production from September 1, 2012 (start of production at the El Gallo 1 mine) to June 30, 2014 is estimated at 63%.

For the six months ended June 30, 2014, production increased by 14% to 17,532 gold equivalent ounces, compared to 15,342 ounces in the first half of 2013. The increase in production was primarily due to 13% more tonnes processed in the first half of 2014 compared to 2013, partly offset by 8% lower grades. Tonnes mined also increased by 4% in 2014 compared to 2013.

Sales

For the three months ended June 30, 2014, sales from El Gallo 1 amounted to $11.6 million, compared to $10.5 million for the same period in 2013, an increase of 11%. While average realized prices remained relatively consistent year-over-year, ounces sold increased by 13%, with 9,024 gold equivalent ounces sold in the second quarter of 2014 compared to 8,020 in 2013.

For the six months ended June 30, 2014, sales decreased by 5% to $22.8 million from $24.0 million in 2013. This decrease is primarily due to lower average realized prices, as average realized prices for gold decreased by 12% from $1,476 per ounce to $1,293 per ounce. These lower prices were partly offset by an increase of 8% in ounces sold, with gold equivalent ounces sold in the first half of 2014 totaling 17,613 ounces, compared to 16,255 ounces in the 2013 period.

Total Cash Costs and All-In Sustaining Costs

Total cash costs for the El Gallo 1 mine per gold equivalent ounce for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 were $852 per gold equivalent ounce sold, compared to $713 per gold equivalent ounce sold for the same period in 2013. The increase in total cash costs is primarily a reflection of a higher strip ratio in the areas being mined in 2014, coupled with lower grades. Further, haulage costs have increased year-over-year, as we are currently mining areas in the pits farther away from the processing plant and waste dumps. We also spent $0.4 million to repair and improve the integrity of the solution pond liners and foundation of the ADR plant, as well as to provide a higher margin of safety in the event of extraordinary rainfall.

All-in sustaining cash costs for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 were $1,257 per gold equivalent ounce, compared to $1,201 per gold equivalent ounce in the same period in 2013. The change is attributable to lower average grades, higher strip ratio, increased haulage costs, and expenditures to repair and improve the liners and ADR plant foundation, as discussed above, partly offset by reduced exploration activities in 2014 compared to 2013.

For the six months ended June 30, 2014, total cash costs per gold equivalent ounce increased year-over-year, with a 6% increase to $788 per gold equivalent ounce, compared to $742 in 2013. All-in sustaining costs per gold equivalent ounce decreased by 12%, to $1,154 per gold equivalent ounce in 2014 compared to $1,317 per ounce in 2013. The decrease in all-in sustaining costs was primarily due to a reduction in exploration activities in 2014 compared to 2013.

30

Table of Contents

Results of Consolidated Operations

Three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to three months ended March 31, 2013

General. For the three months ended June 30, 2014, our net loss was $104.0 million or $0.35 per share, compared to $128.7 million or $0.43 per share for the same period in 2013. Although asset impairments were recorded in both periods, the impairment net of income tax recovery on the Los Azules Project in the second quarter of 2014 was lower than those recorded in the comparable period in 2013 on our investment in MSC and our Santa Cruz exploration properties. In the comparable period in 2013, we also recorded a loss on disposal of $6.4 million on certain claims in Nevada which we sold for less than their carrying value.

Revenue. Gold and silver sales in the three months ended June 30, 2014 totaled $11.6 million. This compares to $10.5 million for the same period in 2013. Ounces of gold and silver sold from our El Gallo 1 mine increased year-over-year, although the benefit from higher sales volume was partly offset by lower average sales prices realized in the three months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the same period in 2013.

Costs and Expenses. Total costs and expenses, excluding impairment charges, in the three months ended June 30, 2014 totaled $20.6 million, compared to $26.5 million in the 2013 period. The decrease was primarily a result of reduced exploration costs and general and administrative expenses. The 2013 period also included a loss of $6.8 million primarily relating to the disposal of certain Nevada properties which we sold for less than their carrying value.

Production costs applicable to sales at El Gallo 1 were $10.9 million in the three months ended June 30, 2014, compared to $8.3 million for the same period in 2013 period. Production costs applicable to sales in the second quarter of 2014 were higher than those in the comparable quarter of 2013 due to a higher average strip ratio, as well as higher haulage costs as we are mining areas in the pits farther away from the processing plant and waste dumps. We also spent $0.4 million to repair and improve the integrity of the solution pond liners and foundation of the ADR plant, as well as to provide a higher margin of safety in the event of extraordinary rainfall. Production costs consist of direct mining costs which include contract mining services, processing costs, personnel costs, certain general and administrative costs, energy costs, operating materials and supplies, repairs and maintenance costs, transport fees, royalty expense and third-party refining costs. Production cost applicable to sales is calculated based on the weighted average cost of ounces sold during the period.

Mine construction costs were $0.2 million in the second quarter of 2014 compared to $nil in the same period in 2013. Mine construction costs in 2014 were incurred in relation to the El Gallo 1 expansion from a nominal 3,000 tonnes per day to 4,500 tonnes per day. As the expansion of El Gallo 1 started in the third quarter of 2013, there were no similar costs in the comparative period of 2013. As noted in our Critical Accounting Policies in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, these costs are expensed rather than capitalized as we have not demonstrated the existence of proven or probable reserves at El Gallo 1 in accordance with SEC Industry Guide 7.

Mine development costs, which are comprised of engineering and development costs for El Gallo 2, were $0.2 million in the three months ended June 30, 2014, compared to $0.1 million in the same period in 2013. As mentioned previously, we continue to advance the construction of the ball mill, even though no final production decision has been made.

Exploration costs in 2014 decreased from the 2013 period from $4.9 million to $2.6 million, reflecting a reduction in expenditures and drilling activities across all exploration projects in 2014. During the 2014 period, we spent $0.2 million in exploration expenditures in Argentina primarily relating to basic geological work on the Los Azules Project. This compares to $2.0 million in exploration expenditures in the comparable period in 2013. For Mexico, during the 2014 period, we spent $1.5 million in exploration expenditures, including approximately 6,500 ft. (1,980 m) of drilling primarily at the El Gallo 1 mine, compared to $1.9 million in 2013 for 7,500 ft. (2,290 m). For Nevada, we spent during the 2014 period $0.8 million in exploration expenditures, which include drilling of approximately 4,550 ft. (1,390 m) at the South Roberts project, compared to $0.9 million in the comparable period in 2013.

31

Table of Contents

Property holding costs increased slightly year-over-year, at $0.7 million in the 2014 period, compared to $0.3 million in the 2013 period.

General and administrative costs decreased in the 2014 period to $3.2 million compared to $4.2 million in 2013, reflecting our focus on cutting overhead in 2014 to conserve working capital.

Loss on investment in MSC, net of amortization, during the three months ended June 30, 2014 was $2.4 million, compared to $1.6 million in the 2013 period. The increase in net loss is primarily a result of fewer ounces sold in the second quarter of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013, as well as lower grades which have increased production costs.

Impairment of mineral property interests of $120.4 million relate to our Los Azules Project. As previously highlighted, As previously highlighted, we recorded an impairment charge of $120.4 million relating to the Los Azules Project. We conduct a review of potential triggering events for all our mineral projects on a quarterly basis. When events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable, we carry out a review and evaluation of our long-lived assets for impairment, in accordance with our accounting policy. Such a triggering event was identified in the second quarter of 2014 with respect to the Los Azules Project. The triggering event identified was a recently announced acquisition of a copper project located in Argentina, which shares similarities with the Los Azules Project due to its scale, location, and stage of development. Based on the announcement day value of the similar project, the estimated market value per pound of copper equivalent mineralized material from this transaction was below the carrying value per pound of copper equivalent mineralized material of the Los Azules Project, indicating a potential significant decrease in the market price of the Los Azules Project, and therefore a requirement to test the Los Azules Project for recoverability. To assist in performing a recoverability test, we engaged a third-party valuation firm who used the observed market value per pound of copper equivalent mineralized material based on this recent and other comparable transactions to estimate the fair value of the Los Azules Project. The carrying value of the property exceeded its estimated fair value, resulting in an impairment charge of $120.4 million, along with a resulting deferred income tax recovery of $22.5 million.

For the three months ended June 30, 2013, the impairment of $27.7 million, along with a recovery of deferred income taxes of $2.3 million, related to exploration properties in Santa Cruz, Argentina. The 2013 period also included a $95.9 million impairment charge on our investment in MSC. The impairments were primarily due to an unexpected and significant decline in gold and silver market prices, continued inflationary pressures and a new tax on mining reserves in Santa Cruz, resulting in a depressed market for exploration properties in Argentina.

Recovery of income taxes. Recovery of income taxes was $25.0 million in the 2014 period, compared to $12.4 million in the 2013 period. The income tax recovery in the second quarter of 2014 includes a $22.5 million tax recovery as a result of the impairment of the Los Azules Project.

Six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to six months ended June 30, 2013

General. For the six months ended June 30, 2014, our net loss was $86.1 million or $0.29 per share, compared to $139.7 million or $0.47 per share for the same period in 2013. Although asset impairments were recorded in both periods, the impairment net of income tax recovery on the Los Azules Project in the second quarter of 2014 was lower than those recorded in the comparable period in 2013 on our investment in MSC and our Santa Cruz exploration properties. In the comparable period in 2013, we also recorded a loss on disposal of $6.4 million on certain claims in Nevada which we sold for less than their carrying value.

Revenue. Gold and silver sales in the six months ended June 30, 2014 totaled $22.8 million. This compares to $24.0 million for the same period in 2013. Ounces of gold and silver sold from our El Gallo 1 mine increased year-over-year, although the benefit from higher sales volume was offset by lower average sales prices realized in the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the same period in 2013.

Costs and Expenses. Total costs and expenses, excluding impairment charges, in the six months ended June 30, 2014 totaled $32.3 million, compared to $58.4 million in the 2013 period. The decrease was largely a result of reduced exploration costs, as well as an increase in our attributable share of income on our investment in MSC. The 2013 period also included a loss on disposal of $6.8 million relating to the sale of certain Nevada properties at a loss.

32

Table of Contents

Production costs applicable to sales at El Gallo 1 were $19.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2014, compared to $18.9 million for the same period in 2013 period. Although fewer ounces were sold during the period, increased mining costs due to a higher average strip ratio and higher haulage cost resulted in a net increase in Production costs applicable to sales. We also spent $0.4 million to repair and improve the integrity of the excess pond liners and foundation of the ADR plant, as well as to provide a higher margin of safety in the event of extraordinary rainfall. Production costs consist of direct mining costs which include contract mining services, processing costs, personnel costs, certain general and administrative costs, energy costs, operating materials and supplies, repairs and maintenance costs, transport fees, royalty expense and third-party refining costs. Production cost applicable to sales is calculated based on the weighted average cost of ounces sold during the period.

Mine construction costs were $1.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to $nil in the same period in 2013. Mine construction costs in 2014 were incurred in relation to the El Gallo 1 expansion from a nominal 3,000 tonnes per day to 4,500 tonnes per day. As the expansion of El Gallo 1 started in the third quarter of 2013, there were no similar costs in the comparative period of 2013. As noted in our Critical Accounting Policies in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, these costs are expensed rather than capitalized as we have not demonstrated the existence of proven or probable reserves at El Gallo 1 in accordance with SEC Industry Guide 7.

Mine development costs, which are comprised of engineering and development costs for El Gallo 2, were $1.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2014, compared to $0.6 million in the same period in 2013, and included a payment of $1.4 million for the Land Use Change permit in January 2014. As mentioned previously, we continue to pursue long-term items for a new mill, even though no final production decision has been made.

Exploration costs in 2014 decreased from the 2013 period from $19.5 million to $5.3 million, reflecting a reduction in expenditures and drilling activities across all exploration projects in 2014. During the 2014 period, we spent $0.8 million in exploration expenditures in Argentina primarily relating to basic geological work on the Los Azules Project. This compares to $13.5 million in exploration expenditures in the comparable period in 2013. For Mexico, during the 2014 period, we spent $2.9 million in exploration expenditures, including approximately 24,400 ft. (7,450 m) of drilling primarily at the El Gallo 1 mine, compared to $4.4 million in 2013 for 50,200 ft. (15,290 m). For Nevada, we spent during the 2014 period $1.5 million in exploration expenditures in the U.S., which include drilling of approximately 4,550 ft. (1,390 m) at the South Roberts project and 2,670 ft. (810 m) at the Grass Valley project, compared to $1.5 million in the comparable period in 2013.

Property holding costs increased year-over-year, at $2.2 million in the 2014 period, compared to $1.7 million in the 2013 period.

General and administrative costs decreased in the 2014 period to $6.4 million compared to $8.4 million in 2013, reflecting our focus on cutting overhead in 2014 to conserve working capital.

Income on investment in MSC, net of amortization, during the six months ended June 30, 2014 was $4.6 million, compared to a loss of $1.8 million in the 2013 period. The improvement is primarily a result the impact of the devaluation of the Argentine peso relative to the U.S. dollar on operating costs, which partly offset lower grades and fewer ounces sold in the 2014 period.

Impairment of mineral property interests of $120.4 million relate to our Los Azules Project, which, as discussed above, was triggered by a recently announced acquisition of a copper project located in Argentina, which the Company believes shares similarities with the Los Azules Project. The carrying value of the property exceeded its estimated fair value, resulting in an impairment charge of $120.4 million, along with a resulting deferred income tax recovery of $22.5 million, for a net impairment charge of $97.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014.

For the six months ended June 30, 2013, the impairment of $27.7 million, along with a recovery of deferred income taxes of $2.3 million, related to certain exploration properties in the Province of Santa Cruz, Argentina. The 2013 period also included a $95.9 million impairment on our investment in MSC.

Recovery of income taxes. Recovery of income taxes was $44.0 million in the 2014 period, compared to $18.9 million in the 2013 period. The income tax recovery in the first half of 2014 includes a $22.5 million tax recovery as a result of the impairment of the Los Azules Project, as well as a recovery of $21.3 million due to the impact of the devaluating Argentine peso on peso-denominated deferred income tax liabilities.

33

Table of Contents

Total Cash Costs, All-In Sustaining Costs and All-In Costs

Total cash costs for all of our operating properties on a consolidated basis for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 were $840 per gold equivalent ounce sold, based on a silver to gold ratio of 60:1, compared to $744 per gold equivalent ounce in the same period in 2013, based on a silver to gold ratio of 52:1. Using a 60:1 conversion ratio, total cash costs per gold equivalent ounce for the second quarter of 2013 would have been $817. The increase in total cash costs was a result of lower grades at both the San José and El Gallo 1 mines. Also affecting costs at the San José mine were an increase in ground support costs in response to less favourable ground conditions, while costs at El Gallo 1 were impacted by higher haulage costs as we are currently mining areas in the pits farther away from the processing plant and waste dumps, as well as expenditures on the repair and improvement of excess pond liners and foundation of the ADR plant and to provide a higher margin of safety in the event of extraordinary rainfall.

Consolidated all-in sustaining costs for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 were $1,283 per gold equivalent ounce, compared to $1,111 per gold equivalent ounce in the same period in 2013, based on a silver to gold ratio of 52:1. Using a 60:1 conversion ratio, all-in sustaining costs per gold equivalent ounce for the second quarter of 2013 would have been $1,182. All-in sustaining costs were impacted by lower exploration expenses, both at the San José and the El Gallo 1 mine, although these benefits were offset by higher operating costs as discussed above, as well as fewer ounces being sold in 2014 compared to 2013 at the San José mine, reducing the number of ounces over which these costs are spread. Higher pre-stripping costs at the El Gallo 1 mine also contributed to the increase in all-in sustaining costs.

Consolidated all-in costs for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 were $1,444 per gold equivalent ounce sold, compared to $1,202 per gold equivalent ounce for the quarter ended June 30, 2013, based on a silver to gold ratio of 52:1. Using a 60:1 conversion ratio, all-in costs per gold equivalent ounce for the second quarter of 2013 would have been $1,274. In addition to those mentioned above, factors contributing to the increase in all-in costs include higher mine development costs relating to advances for the ball mill for the El Gallo 2 project, and higher mine construction costs for the El Gallo 1 expansion. Capital expenditures also include leasehold improvements for the relocation of our corporate office.

Consolidated total cash costs for the six months ended June 30, 2014 were $815 per gold equivalent ounce sold, based on a silver to gold ratio of 60:1, consistent with the 2013 period, based on a silver to gold ratio of 52:1, or a 6% decrease when based on a silver to gold ratio of 60:1. Consolidated all-in sustaining costs for the six months ended June 30, 2014 were $1,191 per gold equivalent ounce sold, based on a silver to gold ratio of 60:1, a decrease of 7% from the 2013 period, based on a silver to gold ratio of 52:1, or 14% when based on a silver to gold ratio of 60:1. Consolidated all-in costs for the six months ended June 30, 2014 were $1,378 per gold equivalent ounce sold, based on a silver to gold ratio of 60:1, a decrease of 15% from the 2013 period, based on a silver to gold ratio of 52:1, or 20% when based on a silver to gold ratio of 60:1. The decrease in costs in 2014 compared to 2013 were primarily due to the impact of the devaluation of the Argentine peso on operating costs at the San José mine and lower exploration expenditures. These partly offset lower grades at both mines, and higher mine construction and development costs related to the El Gallo 1 expansion and the El Gallo 2 ball mill construction.

34

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of June 30, 2014, we had working capital of $28.4 million, comprised of current assets of $42.1 million and current liabilities of $13.7 million. This represents a decrease of approximately $7.2 million from the working capital balance of $35.6 million at of December 31, 2013.

We believe our working capital at June 30, 2014 is sufficient to fund ongoing exploration and corporate activities over the next 12 months. Given current sources of capital and our liquidity needs, we anticipate needing to raise additional capital sometime in 2015. Our sources of working capital at June 30, 2014 include cash on hand, other current assets, cash flows from El Gallo 1 and any distributions from the San José mine. However, in order to fund the development of El Gallo 2, we would need to raise additional of approximately $150 million, given the estimated capital cost significantly exceeds our available working capital. In such case, we would explore several financing methods to complete the development and construction of El Gallo 2, which may include incurring debt, issuing additional equity, equipment leasing and other forms of capital. Our ability to build El Gallo 2 is dependent on one or several of the alternatives being completed.

Net cash used in operations for six months ended June 30, 2014 decreased to $7.1 million from $34.7 million in 2013. Our El Gallo 1 mine contributed $22.8 million in gold and silver sales to operating cash flows in the first half of 2014 compared to $23.2 million in 2013. We also received $7.1 million in dividends from our investment in MSC, compared to $nil in the first half of 2013. These cash inflows were more than offset by cash paid to suppliers and employees of $37.1 million in the first half of 2014 and $58.5 million in 2013. Cash paid to suppliers and employees decreased year-over-year primarily due to a lower level of exploration activities in the 2014 period than in 2013.

Cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2014 was $1.9 million compared to $0.4 million in same period in 2013, primarily relating to additions to property, plant and equipment such as the advances for the El Gallo 2 ball mill, and leasehold improvements for the relocation of our corporate office.

Cash provided by financing activities for six months ended June 30, 2014 was $0.1 million, consistent with the comparable period in 2013, and related to issuances of common stock as part of our Equity Incentive Plan.

Overall, cash decreased by $9.2 million from December 31, 2013 to June 30, 2014.

In an effort to manage our liquidity, during the third quarter of 2013, we entered into an agreement with one of our mining contractors to settle parts of our expected future account payable with shares of our common stock, up to a maximum of 2,500,000 shares. The initial term of the agreement was six months, but we have recently renewed the agreement until July 31, 2014 under substantially similar terms and conditions. The number of shares to be issued will be determined monthly, based on the amount payable by the Company for services rendered above a defined tonnage threshold, using the closing price quoted of the common stock on active markets at the end of every month. As at June 30, 2014, the Company was required to issue approximately 379,400 shares under this agreement. The fair value of this liability is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet as at June 30, 2014. Approximately 107,400 shares were issued in July 2014, with the remained to be issued later in 2014.

In July 2014, we replaced our cash collateral provided to various governmental agencies to cover projected reclamation costs at our Tonkin property with surety bonds, thereby releasing $4.8 million in restricted cash. The annual fees on the surety bonds are 1.5% of their value, and required an upfront 10% deposit.

Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures

In this report, we have provided information prepared or calculated according to U.S. GAAP, as well as provided some Non-U.S. GAAP (“Non-GAAP”) financial performance measures. Because the Non-GAAP performance measures do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by U.S. GAAP, they may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. These measures should not be considered in isolation or as substitutes for measures of performance prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. There are material limitations associated with the use of such Non-GAAP measures. Since these measures do not incorporate revenues, changes in working capital and non-operating cash costs, they are not necessarily indicative of operating profit or loss, or cash flow from operations as determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

35

Table of Contents

Earnings from Mining Operations

The term Earnings from Mining Operations used in this report is a non-GAAP financial measure. We use and report this measure because we believe it provides investors and analysts with a useful measure of the underlying earnings from our mining operations.

We define Earnings from Mining Operations as Gold and Silver Revenues from our El Gallo 1 mine and our 49% attributable share of the San José mine’s Net Sales, less their respective Production Costs Applicable to Sales. To the extent that Production Costs Applicable to Sales may include depreciation and amortization expense related to the fair value increments on historical business acquisitions (fair value paid in excess of the carrying value of the underlying assets and liabilities assumed on the date of acquisition), we deduct this expense in order to arrive at Production Costs Applicable to Sales that only include depreciation and amortization expense incurred at the mine-site level. The San José mine Net Sales and Production Costs Applicable to Sales are presented, on a 100% basis, in Note 4 of the accompanying financial statements.

The following table presents a reconciliation of Earnings from Mining Operations to Gross Profit, a GAAP financial measure.

|  | Three months ended June 30, |  | Six months ended June 30, |
|  | 2014 |  | 2013 |  | 2014 |  | 2013 |
El Gallo 1 earnings from mining operations |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Gold and silver sales |  | $ | 11,637 |  | $ | 10,459 |  | $ | 22,767 |  | $ | 23,957 |
Production costs applicable to sales |  | (10,900 | ) | (8,278 | ) | (19,427 | ) | (18,871 | )
Gross profit |  | 737 |  | 2,181 |  | 3,340 |  | 5,086 |
Less: Amortization related to fair value increments on historical acquisitions included in Production Costs Applicable to Sales |  | 322 |  | 287 |  | 644 |  | 956 |
El Gallo 1 earnings from mining operations |  | 1,059 |  | 2,468 |  | 3,984 |  | 6,042 |
San José earnings from mining operations (49% attributable basis) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net sales |  | 26,085 |  | 33,592 |  | 53,960 |  | 55,061 |
Production costs applicable to sales |  | (20,505 | ) | (28,227 | ) | (39,927 | ) | (46,260 | )
Gross profit |  | 5,580 |  | 5,365 |  | 14,033 |  | 8,801 |
Less: Amortization related to fair value increments on historical acquisitions included in Production Costs Applicable to Sales |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | — |
San José earnings from mining operations |  | 5,580 |  | 5,365 |  | 14,033 |  | 8,801 |
Consolidated earnings from mining operations |  | 6,639 |  | 7,833 |  | 18,017 |  | 14,843 |

36

Table of Contents

Adjusted Net loss, and Adjusted Net Loss Per Share

The term adjusted net loss and adjusted net loss per share used in this report are non-GAAP financial measure. We use and report these measures because we believe it provides investors and analysts with a useful measure of the underlying operating performance of our core mining business.

Adjusted net income (loss) excludes the following items from net income (loss):

· impairment charges (including inventory and VAT receivable write-downs, and impairments of long-lived assets), and the related income tax recovery;

· foreign currency gains and losses, including the impact of foreign currency fluctuations on our deferred income tax liabilities denominated in Argentine peso; and

· other non-recurring items, if applicable.

The following table presents a reconciliation of Adjusted Net Loss to Net Loss, a GAAP financial measure.

|  | Three months ended June 30, |  | Six months ended June 30, |
|  | 2014 |  | 2013 |  | 2014 |  | 2013 |
Net loss |  | $ | (104,022 | ) | $ | (128,681 | ) | $ | (86,135 | ) | $ | (139,663 | )
Write-down of VAT receivable |  | 340 |  | — |  | 340 |  | — |
Impairment of investment in MSC |  | — |  | 95,878 |  | — |  | 95,878 |
Impairment of mineral property interests, net of income taxes |  | 97,941 |  | 25,420 |  | 97,941 |  | 25,420 |
(Gain) loss on sale of assets, net of income taxes |  | 18 |  | 4,539 |  | (18 | ) | 4,539 |
Foreign currency loss (gain) |  | (284 | ) | 1,226 |  | 299 |  | 935 |
Portion of income on investment in MSC resulting from foreign currency fluctuations |  | (122 | ) | (2,637 | ) | (6,010 | ) | (4,580 | )
Portion of income tax recovery resulting from foreign currency fluctuations |  | (2,484 | ) | (7,480 | ) | (21,348 | ) | (13,726 | )
Adjusted net loss |  | (8,613 | ) | (11,735 | ) | (14,931 | ) | (31,197 | )
Adjusted net loss per share - basic |  | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.11 | )
Weighted average common shares outstanding (thousands) - basic |  | 297,164 |  | 297,097 |  | 297,162 |  | 296,938 |

37

Table of Contents

Total Cash Costs, All-In Sustaining Costs and All-In Costs

The terms total cash costs, total cash cost per ounce, all-in sustaining costs, all-in sustaining cost per ounce, all-in costs and all-in cost per ounce used in this report are non-GAAP financial measures. We report these measures to provide additional information regarding operational efficiencies both on a consolidated and an individual mine basis (San José mine and El Gallo 1 mine), and believe these measures provide investors and analysts with useful information about our underlying costs of operations. For the San José mine, where we hold a 49% share in the production through our 49% interest in MSC, we exclude the share of gold or silver production attributable to the controlling interest.

The measure total cash costs and total cash cost per ounce are calculated in accordance with the Production Cost Standard developed by The Gold Institute, which was a worldwide association of suppliers of gold and gold products and included leading North American gold producers. The Gold Institute ceased operations in 2002, but we believe the standard is still the accepted standard of reporting cash costs of production in North America. Adoption of the standard is voluntary and the cost measures presented may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies.

The measures all-in sustaining costs, all-in sustaining costs per ounce, all-in costs and all-in costs per ounce were adopted in 2013, as we believe that the these measures better represents the total costs associated with producing gold. We have adopted this reporting methodology based on the standard from the World Gold Council (as promulgated in their June 27, 2013 press release, World Gold Council’s Guidance Note on Non-GAAP Metrics — All-In Sustaining Costs and All-In Costs). There is no assurance that these measures are necessarily comparable to our industry peers.

Total cash costs consists of mining, processing, on-site general and administrative costs, community and permitting costs related to current operations, royalty costs, refining and treatment charges (for both doré and concentrate products), sales costs, export taxes and operational stripping costs, and exclude depreciation and amortization. In order to arrive at our consolidated total cash costs, we also include our attributable share of total cash costs from operations where we hold less than a 100% economic share in the production, such as MSC where we hold a 49% interest. The sum of these costs is divided by the corresponding gold equivalent ounces sold to determine a per ounce amount.

All-in sustaining costs consists of total cash costs (as described above), plus environmental rehabilitation costs and amortization of the asset retirement costs related to operating sites, sustaining exploration and development costs, and sustaining capital expenditures. In order to arrive at our consolidated all-in sustaining costs, we also include our attributable share of all-in sustaining costs from operations where we hold less than a 100% economic share in the production, as well as attributable corporate general and administrative expenses. The sum of these costs is divided by the corresponding gold equivalent ounces sold to determine a per ounce amount.

All-in costs include community, permitting and reclamation and remediation costs not related to current operations, non-sustaining exploration and development costs and non-sustaining capital expenditures. As these costs do not relate to any particular producing operation, we divide the sum of these costs by the consolidated gold equivalent ounces sold, including our attributable share of any operation where we hold less than a 100% interest, and do not provide this measure on a per mine basis.

Costs excluded from total cash costs, sustaining all-in sustaining costs and all-in costs are income tax expense, all financing charges, costs related to business combinations, asset acquisitions and asset disposal, and any items that are deducted for the purpose of normalising items, as described in Adjusted Net loss, and Adjusted Net Loss Per Share above.

For MSC, co-product total cash costs and all-in sustaining costs are calculated by dividing the respective proportionate share of the total cash costs, all-in sustaining costs, and all-in costs for each metal sold for the period by the ounces of each respective metal sold. The respective proportionate share of each metal sold is calculated based on their pro-rated sales value. Approximately 48% of the value of the sales in the second quarter of 2014 was derived from gold and 52% was derived from silver. This compares to 43% and 57% for gold and silver, respectively, for the same period in 2013. For the six months ended June 30, 2014, approximately 49% of the value of the sales was derived from gold and 51% from silver, compared to 48% and 52% for the comparable period in 2013, respectively.

38

Table of Contents

The following tables reconcile these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, Production Costs Applicable to Sales. Total cash costs, all-in sustaining costs, all-in costs and ounces of gold and silver sold for the San José mine are provided to us by MSC.

Reconciliation of Total Cash Costs to Production Costs Applicable to Sales

|  | Three months ended June 30, |  | Six months ended June 30, |
|  | 2014 |  | 2013 |  | 2014 |  | 2013 |
|  | (in thousands, except per ounce) |  | (in thousands, except per ounce) |
Production costs applicable to sales |  | $ | 10,900 |  | $ | 8,278 |  | $ | 19,427 |  | $ | 18,871 |
Less: Depreciation |  | (322 | ) | (287 | ) | (644 | ) | (956 | )
Less: Pre-stripping costs for future pit access |  | (2,860 | ) | (2,422 | ) | (5,148 | ) | (6,235 | )
On-site general and administrative expenses |  | 313 |  | 149 |  | 567 |  | 369 |
Property holding costs |  | — |  | — |  | 13 |  | 14 |
Other non-cash adjustments |  | (340 | ) | — |  | (340 | ) | — |
Total cash costs (El Gallo 1 Mine) |  | $ | 7,691 |  | $ | 5,718 |  | $ | 13,875 |  | $ | 12,063 |
McEwen’s share of MSC total cash costs (49%) |  | 18,895 |  | 25,851 |  | 37,748 |  | 41,321 |
Consolidated total cash costs |  | $ | 26,586 |  | $ | 31,569 |  | $ | 51,623 |  | $ | 53,384 |
Per gold equivalent ounce sold: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Total cash costs (El Gallo 1 Mine) |  | $ | 852 |  | $ | 713 |  | $ | 788 |  | $ | 742 |
McEwen’s share of MSC total cash costs (49%) |  | 836 |  | 751 |  | 826 |  | 842 |
Consolidated total cash costs (including McEwen’s share of MSC) |  | 840 |  | 744 |  | 815 |  | 817 |

Reconciliation of All-In Sustaining Costs to Total Cash Costs

|  | Three months ended June 30, |  | Six months ended June 30, |
|  | 2014 |  | 2013 |  | 2014 |  | 2013 |
|  | (in thousands, except per ounce) |  | (in thousands, except per ounce) |
Total cash costs (excluding McEwen’s share of MSC) |  | $ | 7,691 |  | $ | 5,718 |  | $ | 13,875 |  | $ | 12,063 |
Operating site reclamation accretion and amortization |  | 200 |  | 153 |  | 401 |  | 432 |
On-site exploration expenses |  | 595 |  | 1,341 |  | 907 |  | 2,671 |
Pre-stripping costs for future pit access |  | 2,860 |  | 2,422 |  | 5,148 |  | 6,235 |
All-in sustaining costs (El Gallo 1 Mine) |  | $ | 11,346 |  | $ | 9,634 |  | $ | 20,331 |  | $ | 21,401 |
McEwen’s share of MSC all-in sustaining costs (49%) |  | 26,333 |  | 33,480 |  | 49,264 |  | 55,502 |
Corporate general and administrative expenses |  | 2,899 |  | 4,068 |  | 5,873 |  | 8,040 |
Consolidated all-in sustaining costs (including McEwen’s share of MSC) |  | $ | 40,578 |  | $ | 47,182 |  | $ | 75,467 |  | $ | 84,943 |
Per gold equivalent ounce sold: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
All-in sustaining costs (El Gallo 1 Mine) |  | $ | 1,257 |  | $ | 1,201 |  | $ | 1,154 |  | $ | 1,317 |
McEwen’s share of MSC all-in sustaining costs (49%) |  | 1,165 |  | 972 |  | 1,077 |  | 1,131 |
Consolidated all-in sustaining costs (including McEwen’s share of MSC) |  | 1,283 |  | 1,111 |  | 1,191 |  | 1,300 |

Reconciliation of All-In Costs to All-In Sustaining Costs

|  | Three months ended June 30, |  | Six months ended June 30, |
|  | 2014 |  | 2013 |  | 2014 |  | 2013 |
|  | (in thousands, except per ounce) |  | (in thousands, except per ounce) |
Consolidated all-in sustaining costs (including McEwen’s share of MSC) |  | $ | 40,578 |  | $ | 47,182 |  | $ | 75,467 |  | $ | 84,943 |
Property holding costs (non-sustaining) |  | 734 |  | 316 |  | 2,175 |  | 1,679 |
Reclamation accretion and amortization (non-operating sites) |  | 38 |  | 63 |  | 68 |  | 118 |
Exploration expenses (non-sustaining) |  | 2,042 |  | 3,548 |  | 4,410 |  | 16,968 |
Mine development (non-sustaining) |  | 1,590 |  | 98 |  | 3,158 |  | 2,797 |
Mine construction and capital expenditures (non-sustaining) |  | 708 |  | (175 | ) | 2,018 |  | — |
Consolidated all-in costs (including McEwen’s share of MSC) |  | $ | 45,691 |  | $ | 51,032 |  | $ | 87,297 |  | $ | 106,505 |
Per gold equivalent ounce sold: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Consolidated all-in costs (including McEwen’s share of MSC) |  | $ | 1,444 |  | $ | 1,202 |  | $ | 1,378 |  | $ | 1,630 |

39

Table of Contents

Average realized prices

The term average realized price per ounce used in this report is also a non-GAAP financial measure. We report this measure to better understand the price realized in each reporting period for gold and silver.

Average realized price is calculated as sales of gold and silver (excluding commercial deductions) over the number of ounces sold in the period.

The following table reconciles this non-GAAP measure to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, Gold and Silver Sales. O unces of gold and silver sold for the San José mine are provided to us by MSC.

|  | Three months ended June 30, |
|  | 2014 |  | 2013 |
|  | (in thousands, except ounce and per ounce) |
|  | El Gallo Phase 1 |  | MSC (49% interest) |  | Total |  | El Gallo Phase 1 |  | MSC (49% interest) |  | Total |
Gold sales |  | $ | 11,504 |  | $ | 13,016 |  | $ | 24,520 |  | $ | 10,332 |  | $ | 18,211 |  | $ | 28,543 |
Silver sales |  | 133 |  | 14,291 |  | 14,424 |  | 126 |  | 17,312 |  | 17,438 |
Gold and silver sales |  | $ | 11,637 |  | $ | 27,307 |  | $ | 38,944 |  | $ | 10,458 |  | $ | 35,523 |  | $ | 45,981 |
Gold ounces sold |  | 8,911 |  | 10,267 |  | 19,179 |  | 7,897 |  | 15,668 |  | 23,565 |
Silver ounces sold |  | 6,760 |  | 740,543 |  | 747,303 |  | 6,400 |  | 975,605 |  | 982,005 |
Gold equivalent ounces sold |  | 9,024 |  | 22,610 |  | 31,634 |  | 8,020 |  | 34,430 |  | 42,449 |
Average realized price per gold ounce sold |  | $ | 1,291 |  | $ | 1,268 |  | $ | 1,278 |  | $ | 1,308 |  | $ | 1,162 |  | $ | 1,211 |
Average realized price per silver ounce sold |  | $ | 19.58 |  | $ | 19.30 |  | $ | 19.30 |  | $ | 19.71 |  | $ | 17.74 |  | $ | 17.76 |
Average realized price per gold equivalent ounce sold |  | $ | 1,289 |  | $ | 1,208 |  | $ | 1,231 |  | $ | 1,304 |  | $ | 1,032 |  | $ | 1,083 |

|  | Six months ended June 30, |
|  | 2014 |  | 2013 |
|  | (in thousands, except ounce and per ounce) |
|  | El Gallo Phase 1 |  | MSC (49% interest) |  | Total |  | El Gallo Phase 1 |  | MSC (49% interest) |  | Total |
Gold sales |  | $ | 22,602 |  | $ | 27,625 |  | $ | 50,227 |  | $ | 23,596 |  | $ | 27,860 |  | $ | 51,456 |
Silver sales |  | 165 |  | 29,028 |  | 29,193 |  | 361 |  | 29,933 |  | $ | 30,294 |
Gold and silver sales |  | $ | 22,767 |  | $ | 56,653 |  | $ | 79,420 |  | $ | 23,957 |  | $ | 57,793 |  | $ | 81,750 |
Gold ounces sold |  | 17,474 |  | 21,193 |  | 38,667 |  | 15,982 |  | 21,947 |  | 37,929 |
Silver ounces sold |  | 8,360 |  | 1,471,960 |  | 1,480,320 |  | 14,200 |  | 1,411,253 |  | 1,425,453 |
Gold equivalent ounces sold |  | 17,613 |  | 45,726 |  | 63,339 |  | 16,255 |  | 49,087 |  | 65,342 |
Average realized price per gold ounce sold |  | $ | 1,293 |  | $ | 1,303 |  | $ | 1,299 |  | $ | 1,476 |  | $ | 1,269 |  | $ | 1,357 |
Average realized price per silver ounce sold |  | $ | 19.71 |  | $ | 19.72 |  | $ | 19.72 |  | $ | 25.39 |  | $ | 21.21 |  | $ | 21.25 |
Average realized price per gold equivalent ounce sold |  | $ | 1,293 |  | $ | 1,239 |  | $ | 1,254 |  | $ | 1,474 |  | $ | 1,177 |  | $ | 1,251 |

40

Table of Contents

Gold equivalent ounces

The following table summarizes the consolidated number of gold equivalent ounces sold used to calculate total cash costs, all-in sustaining costs, all-in costs, and average realized prices, discussed above, on a per ounce basis. Gold equivalent ounces are calculated using an average silver to gold ratio of 60:1, as determined in our 2014 budget. Prior to 2014, the silver to gold ratio was 52:1.

Consolidated gold equivalent ounces sold

|  | Three months ended June 30, |  | Six months ended June 30, |
|  | 2014 |  | 2013 |  | 2014 |  | 2013 |
Gold equivalent ounces sold (El Gallo 1 Mine) |  | 9,024 |  | 8,020 |  | 17,613 |  | 16,255 |
McEwen’s share of MSC gold equivalent ounces sold |  | 22,610 |  | 34,429 |  | 45,726 |  | 49,087 |
Consolidated gold equivalent ounces sold (including McEwen’s share of MSC) |  | 31,634 |  | 42,449 |  | 63,339 |  | 65,342 |
Silver : gold ratio |  | 60 : 1 |  | 52 : 1 |  | 60 : 1 |  | 52 : 1 |

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of June 30, 2014, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements (as that phrase is defined by SEC rules applicable to this report) which have or are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Critical Accounting Policies

Critical accounting policies and estimates used to prepare the financial statements are discussed with our Audit Committee as they are implemented and on an annual basis.

There have been no significant changes in our Critical Accounting Policies since December 31, 2013.

41

Table of Contents

Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains or incorporates by reference “forward-looking statements,” as that term is used in federal securities laws, about our financial condition, results of operations and business. These statements include, among others:

· statements about our anticipated exploration results, cost and feasibility of production, receipt of permits or other regulatory or government approvals and plans for the development of our properties;

· statements concerning the benefits or outcomes that we expect will result from our business activities and certain transactions that we contemplate or have completed, such as receipt of proceeds, increased revenues, decreased expenses and avoided expenses and expenditures; and

· statements of our expectations, beliefs, future plans and strategies, anticipated developments and other matters that are not historical facts.

These statements may be made expressly in this document or may be incorporated by reference to other documents that we will file with the SEC. You can find many of these statements by looking for words such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates” or similar expressions used in this report or incorporated by reference in this report.

Forward-looking statements and information are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by management, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties, risks and contingencies, and there can be no assurance that such statements and information will prove to be accurate. Therefore, actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements and information. We caution you not to put undue reliance on these statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. Further, the information contained in this document or incorporated herein by reference is a statement of our present intention and is based on present facts and assumptions, and may change at any time and without notice, based on changes in such facts or assumptions. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

Risk Factors Impacting Forward-Looking Statements

The important factors that could prevent us from achieving our stated goals and objectives include, but are not limited to, those set forth in other reports we have filed with the SEC and the following:

· our ability to raise funds required for the execution of our business strategy;

· our ability to secure permits or other regulatory and government approvals needed to operate, develop or explore our mineral properties and projects;

· decisions of foreign countries and banks within those countries;

· unexpected changes in business, economic, and political conditions;

· results of MSC;

· fluctuations in interest rates, currency exchange rates, or commodity prices;

· timing and amount of mine production;

· our ability to retain and attract key personnel;

· technological changes in the mining industry;

· changes in operating, exploration or overhead costs;

· access and availability of materials, equipment, supplies, labor and supervision, power and water;

· results of current and future exploration activities;

· results of pending and future feasibility studies or the expansion or commencement of mining operations without feasibility studies having been completed;

· changes in our business strategy;

· interpretation of drill hole results and the geology, grade and continuity of mineralization;

· the uncertainty of reserve and resource estimates and timing of development expenditures;

· litigation or regulatory investigations and procedures affecting us;

· local and community impacts and issues including criminal activity and violent crimes; and

· accidents, public health issues, and labor disputes.

We undertake no responsibility or obligation to update publicly these forward-looking statements, except as required by law and may update these statements in the future in written or oral statements. Investors should take note of any future statements made by or on our behalf.

42

Table of Contents

Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

Our exposure to market risks includes, but is not limited to, the following risks: changes in foreign currency exchange rates, changes in interest rates, equity price risks, commodity price fluctuations and country risk. We do not use derivative financial instruments as part of an overall strategy to manage market risk.

Foreign Currency Risk

While we transact most of our business in U.S. dollars, some expenses, labor, operating supplies and property and equipment are denominated in Canadian dollars, Mexican pesos or Argentine pesos. As a result, currency exchange fluctuations may impact our operating costs. The appreciation of non-U.S. dollar currencies against the U.S. dollar increases costs and the cost of purchasing property and equipment in U.S. dollar terms in Canada, Mexico and Argentina, which can adversely impact our operating results and cash flows. Conversely, a depreciation of non-U.S. dollar currencies usually decreases operating costs and property and equipment purchases in U.S. dollar terms in foreign countries.

Since 2008, the Argentine peso has been steadily devaluing against the U.S. dollar by 10-30% on an annual basis. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Argentine peso devalued by 29%. The Argentine peso devalued further, with a devaluation of 25% during the six months ended June 30, 2014. Due to restrictions in holding other currencies, MSC holds all of their local cash balances in Argentine pesos and are therefore exposed to the effects of this continued devaluation and also the risk that there may be a sudden severe devaluation of the Argentine peso. A severe devaluation could result in material foreign exchange losses as reported in U.S. dollars.

The value of cash and cash equivalents denominated in foreign currencies also fluctuates with changes in currency exchange rates. Appreciation of non-U.S. dollar currencies results in a foreign currency gain on such investments and a depreciation in non-U.S. dollar currencies results in a loss. We have not utilized material market risk-sensitive instruments to manage our exposure to foreign currency exchange rates but may in the future actively manage our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk. We hold portions of our cash reserves in non-U.S. dollar currencies. Based on our Canadian cash balance of $3.5 million (C$ 3.7 million) at June 30, 2014, a 1% change in the Canadian dollar would result in a gain/loss of $0.03 million in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. We also hold negligible portions of our cash reserves in Mexican and Argentine peso.

43

Table of Contents

Interest Rate Risk

We have no bank debt outstanding nor do we have any investment in debt instruments other than highly liquid short-term investments. Accordingly, we consider our interest rate risk exposure to be insignificant at this time.

Equity Price Risk

We have in the past sought and will likely in the future seek to acquire additional funding by sale of common stock. Movements in the price of our common stock have been volatile in the past and may also be volatile in the future. As a result, there is a risk that we may not be able to sell common stock at an acceptable price to meet future funding requirements.

Commodity Price Risk

Changes in the price of gold and silver could significantly affect our results of operations and cash flows in the future. We have in the past and may in the future hold a portion of our treasury in gold and silver bullion, which is recorded at the lower of cost or market. Gold and silver prices may fluctuate widely from time to time. Based on our revenues from gold and silver sales of $22.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 (exclusive of our investment in MSC), a 10% change in the price of gold and silver would have had an impact of approximately $2.8 million on our revenues.

Credit Risk

We may be exposed to credit loss through our precious metals and doré sales agreements with Canadian financial institutions if these institutions are unable to make payment in accordance with the terms of the agreement. However, based on the history and financial condition of our counterparties, we do not anticipate any of the financial institutions to default on their obligation. As of June 30, 2014, we do not believe we have any significant credit exposure associated with precious metals and our doré sales agreements.

In Mexico, we are exposed to credit loss regarding our IVA taxes receivable, if the Mexican tax authorities are unable to make payments in accordance with our monthly filings. Collection timing on IVA receivables is uncertain. The risk is mitigated to the extent that the IVA receivable balance can be applied against future income taxes payable. However, at this time we are uncertain when, if ever, our Mexican operations will generate sufficient taxable operating profits to offset this receivable against taxes payable. As at June 30, 2014, we continue to face credit risk on the collection of our IVA receivables.

In Nevada, we are required to provide security to cover our projected reclamation costs. We have surety bonds of $4.8 million in place to satisfy bonding requirements for this purpose. The bonds have an annual fee of 1.5% of their value, with an upfront deposit of 10%. Although we do not believe we have any significant credit exposure associated with these bonds, we are exposed to credit loss regarding our deposit if the surety bond underwriter defaults on its coverage of the bond. There is also the risk the surety bonds may no longer be accepted by the governmental agencies as satisfactory reclamation coverage, in which case we would be required to replace the surety bonding with cash.

44

Table of Contents

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) We maintain a system of controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. As of June 30, 2014, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, management has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

(b) Changes in Internal Controls. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2014 that materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

Certain factors may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. You should consider carefully the risks and uncertainties described below, in addition to other information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes, and in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 and the other reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The following risk factors update and supplement the risk factors previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are unaware of, or that we currently believe are not material, may also become important factors that adversely affect our business. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects could be materially and adversely affected. In that event, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you could lose part or all of your investment.

We are currently the subject of a voluntary inquiry by the SEC with respect to the accounting treatment of our Los Azules Project.

We are currently the subject of an inquiry by the Financial Reporting and Audit Task Force of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement requesting certain information from us on a voluntary basis (the “Inquiry”). The Inquiry commenced in late November 2013. The SEC has stated that the Inquiry should not be construed as an indication by the SEC or its staff that any violation of law has occurred, nor should it be considered a reflection on any person, entity or security. Based on our assessment of the questions asked and documents requested by the SEC, we believe the Inquiry concerns the accounting treatment of the Company’s Los Azules Project for the period ending June 30, 2013 (“Q2 2013”) and specifically why the Los Azules Project was not classified as “held for sale” pursuant to ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment, and why we did not record an impairment relating to the Los Azules Project during Q2 2013, at which time the Company’s precious metals assets in Argentina were impaired and during which time the Company was engaging in a sales process for the Los Azules Project.

45

Table of Contents

The Company conducts a review of potential impairment triggers for all its mineral projects on a quarterly basis. The impairment analysis and valuation is carried out by a third-party international valuation and corporate finance advisory firm. The Company found no indicators for impairment in Q1 2013. In Q2 2013 there were adverse changes in the economic environment for mining companies, which was considered to be an indicator of impairment under ASC 360-10-35-21a. Consequently, the Company, using our external consultants, performed impairment tests for all its Argentine assets, including the Los Azules Project. The results of the impairment tests conducted by our external consultants indicated that, although certain of our precious metal assets in Argentina were impaired, there was no impairment for the Los Azules Project. In Q3 2013 no indicators of impairment were identified for the Los Azules Project. For Q4 2013, annual impairment testing was performed on all assets and no impairment of the Project was recorded. In Q1 2014, no indicators of impairment were identified for the Los Azules Project. As set out in Note 3 of the accompanying financial statements in this Form 10-Q, indicators of impairment for the Los Azules Project were identified for Q2 2014 due to the sale of Lumina Copper Corp.’s Taca Taca copper project to First Quantum Minerals Ltd. The Company consequently recorded an impairment charge of $120.4 million relating to the Los Azules Project during Q2 2014. The Company believes that the “asset held for sale” criteria under ASC 360 were never satisfied for the Los Azules Project in any of the periods presented above. In addition, our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013 were audited by our independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, who issued an unqualified opinion on our 2013 annual consolidated financial statements.

We have cooperated fully and intend to continue to cooperate fully with the SEC. Following a meeting with the SEC in Washington, DC on April 7, 2014, we delivered our responses to the SEC’s third request for documents in late April 2014. There have been no additional requests by the SEC for information since that time. At this point, we are unable to predict what, if any, consequences the Inquiry may have on us. However, the Inquiry may continue to result in considerable legal expenses and divert management’s attention from other business concerns. If the SEC were to commence legal action, we could be required to pay significant penalties or other amounts and could become subject to injunctions, an administrative cease and desist order or other equitable remedies. The resolution of the Inquiry could require the filing of restatements of our prior financial statements or require that we take other actions not presently contemplated. We can provide no assurances as to the outcome of the Inquiry, and the outcome could have a material adverse impact on our business.

Our operations in Argentina and Mexico are subject to changes in political conditions, regulations and crime.

Although all of our operations are subject to changes in political conditions, regulations and crime, the Company has substantial investments in Argentina and is therefore subject to risks normally associated with the conduct of business in foreign countries. Argentina has undergone significant government regulations with respect to, but not limited to, restrictions on production, price controls, export controls, currency remittance, importation of parts and supplies, income and other taxes, expropriation of property, foreign investment, maintenance of claims, environmental legislation, land use, land claims of local people, water use and mine safety. These changes and changes, if any, in mining or investment policies or shifts in political attitude in any of the other jurisdictions in which the Company operates may adversely affect the Company’s operations or profitability. There also is the risk of political violence and increased social tension in Argentina as the country has experienced periods of crime, and civil and labor unrest. Certain political and economic events such as acts, or failures to act, by government authorities in Argentina, and acts of political violence could have a material adverse effect on our ability to operate in the country.

In 2014, there continues to be a high level of economic instability. In July 2014, Argentina failed to reach an agreement to avert its second bond default in 12 years. The full consequences of the default on Argentina’s political and economic landscape, and on the Company, are still unclear.

46

Table of Contents

Item 6. EXHIBITS

The following exhibits are filed or furnished with this report:

31.1 |  | Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Robert R. McEwen.
31.2 |  | Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Perry Y. Ing.
32 |  | Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Robert R. McEwen and Perry Y. Ing.
101 |  | The following materials from McEwen Mining Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 are furnished herewith, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2014 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2013, (iii) the Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholder’s Equity for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, (iv) the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, and (v) the Unaudited Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

47

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

| MCEWEN MINING INC.
| /s/ Robert R. McEwen
Date: August 6, 2014 | By Robert R. McEwen,
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
| /s/ Perry Y. Ing
Date: August 6, 2014 | By Perry Y. Ing,
| Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

48