XML 27 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.25.4

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Dec. 31, 2025
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Principles of Consolidation The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, including the Operating Parnership and its wholly owned subsidiaries, and its equity investment in an unconsolidated joint venture. The Company presents the portion of any equity it does not own but controls (and thus consolidates) as noncontrolling interest. Noncontrolling interest in the Company includes the LTIP Units that have been granted to directors, officers and affiliates of the Company and the OP Units held by third parties. Refer to Note 5 – “Equity” and Note 7 – “Stock-Based Compensation” for additional information regarding the OP Units and LTIP Units. The Company classifies noncontrolling interest as a component of consolidated equity on its Consolidated Balance Sheets, separate from the Company’s total equity. The Company’s net income or loss is allocated to noncontrolling interests based on the respective ownership or voting percentage in the Operating Partnership associated with such noncontrolling interests and is removed from consolidated income or loss on the Consolidated Statements of Operations in order to derive net income or loss attributable to common stockholders. The noncontrolling ownership percentage is calculated by dividing the aggregate number of LTIP Units and OP Units by the total number of units and shares outstanding. Reverse Stock Split In August 2025, the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”) approved a reverse stock split of the Company’s outstanding and authorized shares of common stock at a ratio of one-for-five (the “Reverse Stock Split”). The Reverse Stock Split was completed on September 19, 2025. As a result of the Reverse Stock Split, on September 19, 2025, every five issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock was converted into one share of its common stock, with a corresponding reverse split of the LTIP Units and OP Units. The par value of each share of the Company’s common stock remained unchanged. All common share, unit and per common share and per unit amounts in these consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and applicable disclosures have been retrospectively adjusted for all periods presented to reflect the Reverse Stock Split. Refer to Note 5 – “Equity” and Note 7 – “Stock Based Compensation” for additional details on the Reverse Stock Split. Use of Estimates The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and footnotes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Investment in Real Estate The Company determines when an acquisition meets the definition of a business or alternatively should be accounted for as an asset acquisition in accordance with Accounting Standard Codification ("ASC") Topic 805 "Business Combinations" ("ASC Topic 805"), which requires that, when substantially all of the fair value of an acquisition is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the asset or group of similar identifiable assets does not meet the definition of a business and therefore is required to be accounted for as an asset acquisition. Transaction costs are capitalized for asset acquisitions and expensed as incurred for business combinations. For asset acquisitions that are “owner occupied” (meaning that the seller either is the tenant or controls the tenant), the purchase price, including capitalized acquisition costs, will be allocated to land and building based on their relative fair values with no value allocated to intangible assets or liabilities. For asset acquisitions where there is a lease in place but not “owner occupied,” the Company will allocate the purchase price to tangible assets and any intangible assets acquired or liabilities assumed based on their relative fair values. Fair value is determined based upon the guidance of ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” and generally are determined using Level 2 inputs, such as rent comparables, sales comparables, and broker indications. Although Level 3 Inputs are utilized, they are minor in comparison to the Level 2 data used for the primary assumptions. The determination of fair value involves the use of significant judgment and estimates. We make estimates to determine the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed using information obtained from multiple sources, including pre-acquisition due diligence, and we routinely utilize the assistance of a third-party appraiser. Valuation of tangible assets: The fair value of land is determined using the sales comparison approach whereby recent comparable land sales and listings are gathered and summarized. The available market data is analyzed and compared to the land being valued and adjustments are made for dissimilar characteristics such as market conditions, size, and location. The Company estimates the fair value of buildings acquired on an as-if-vacant basis and depreciates the building value over its estimated remaining life. Fair value is primarily based on estimated cash flow projections that utilize discount and/or capitalization rates as well as available market information. The Company determines the fair value of site improvements (non-building improvements that include paving and other) using the cost approach, with a deduction for depreciation, and depreciates the site improvements over their estimated remaining useful lives. Tenant improvements represent fixed improvements to tenant spaces, the fair value of which is estimated using prevailing market tenant improvement allowances. Tenant improvements are amortized over the remaining term of the lease. Valuation of intangible assets: In determining the fair value of in-place leases (the avoided cost associated with existing in-place leases) management considers current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases in arriving at an estimate of the carrying costs during the expected lease-up period from vacant to existing occupancy. In estimating carrying costs, management includes reimbursable (based on market lease terms) real estate taxes, insurance, other operating expenses, as well as estimates of lost market rental revenue during the expected lease-up periods. The values assigned to in-place leases are amortized over the remaining term of the lease. The fair value of above-or-below market leases is estimated based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflected the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between contractual amounts to be received pursuant to the leases and management’s estimate of market lease rates measured over a period equal to the estimated remaining term of the lease. An above market lease is classified as an intangible asset and a below market lease is classified as an intangible liability. The capitalized above-market or below-market lease intangibles are amortized as a reduction of, or an addition to, rental income over the estimated remaining term of the respective leases. Intangible assets related to leasing costs consist of leasing commissions and legal fees. Leasing commissions are estimated by multiplying the remaining contract rent associated with each lease by a market leasing commission. Legal fees represent legal costs associated with writing, reviewing, and sometimes negotiating various lease terms. Leasing costs are amortized over the remaining useful life of the respective leases. Revenue Recognition The Company’s operations primarily consist of rental revenue earned from tenants under leasing arrangements which provide for minimum rent and escalations. The leases have been accounted for as operating leases. For operating leases with contingent rental escalators, revenue is recorded based on the contractual cash rental payments due during the period. Revenue from leases with fixed annual rental escalators are recognized on a straight-line basis over the initial lease term, subject to a collectability assessment, with the difference between the contractual rental receipts and the straight-line amounts recorded as a “deferred rent receivable.” Additionally, the Company recognizes as a component of rental revenue, “expense recoveries” revenue, which represents revenue recognized related to tenant reimbursement of real estate taxes, insurance, and certain other operating expenses (“tenant reimbursements”). The Company recognizes these reimbursements and related expenses on a gross basis in its Consolidated Statements of Operations. Assets Held for Sale and Sales of Real Estate The Company classifies a property as held for sale when the following criteria are met: (i) management, having the authority to approve action, commits to a plan to sell the property in its present condition, (ii) the sale of the property is at a price reasonable in relation to its current fair value and (iii) the sale is probable and expected to be completed within one year. At that time, the Company presents the assets and obligations associated with the real estate held for sale separately in its Consolidated Balance Sheets and ceases recording depreciation and amortization expense related to that asset. Real estate held for sale is reported at the lower of its carrying amount or its estimated fair value less estimated costs to sell. None of the Company’s properties were classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2025 or 2024. Upon the disposition of a property, the Company recognizes a gain or loss at a point in time when the Company determines control of the underlying asset has been transferred to the buyer. The Company’s performance obligation is generally satisfied at the closing of the transaction. Any continuing involvement is analyzed as a separate performance obligation in the contract, and a portion of the sales price is allocated to each performance obligation. There is significant judgment applied to estimate the amount of variable consideration, if any, identified within the sales price and assess its probability of occurrence based on current market information, historical transactions, and forecasted information that is reasonably available. For sales of real estate (or assets classified as held for sale), the Company evaluates whether the disposition is a strategic shift that will have a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results, and, if so, it will be classified as discontinued operations in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for all periods presented. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets The Company evaluates its real estate assets for impairment at each reporting date or whenever events or circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. If an impairment indicator exists, the Company compares the expected future undiscounted cash flows against the carrying amount of the asset. If the sum of the estimated undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset, the Company would record an impairment loss for the difference between the estimated fair value and the carrying amount of the asset. Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash The Company considers all demand deposits, cashier’s checks, money market accounts, and certificates of deposit with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Amounts included in restricted cash represent certain security deposits received from tenants at the inception of their leases and funds held by the Company related to certain tenant reimbursements. The following table provides a reconciliation of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash that sums to the total of those amounts at the end of the periods presented on the Company’s accompanying Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows: ​ ​
​ | ​ | ​ | ​ | ​ | ​ | ​
​ | ​ | As of December 31,
​ | ​ ​ ​ | 2025 | ​ ​ ​ | 2024
Cash and cash equivalents |  | $ | 9,084 |  | $ | 6,815
Restricted cash | ​ | ​ | 2,805 | ​ | ​ | 2,127
Total cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash |  | $ | 11,889 |  | $ | 8,942
​ Tenant Receivables, Net The tenant receivable balance as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 was $7,225 and $7,424, respectively. The balance as of December 31, 2025 consisted of $2,650 in funds owed from the Company’s tenants for rent that the Company had earned but had not yet received, $4,012 of tenant reimbursements, $107 for a loan that was made to one of the Company’s tenants, and $456 of miscellaneous receivables. The balance as of December 31, 2024 consisted of $2,838 in funds owed from the Company’s tenants for rent that the Company had earned but had not yet received, $4,014 of tenant reimbursements, $119 for a loan that was made to one of the Company’s tenants, and $453 of miscellaneous receivables. Receivables arising from operating leases are accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic 842 “Leases” (“ASC Topic 842”). The Company assesses the likelihood of losses resulting from tenant defaults, or the inability of tenants to make contractual rent and tenant reimbursements at each reporting date. The Company also monitors the liquidity and creditworthiness of its tenants and operators on a continuous basis. If the likelihood of a tenant paying its lease payments is determined to no longer be probable, all tenant receivables, including deferred rent, are written off against revenue and any future revenue for that tenant is recognized only upon receipt of cash. In addition, as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company had a portfolio level reserve of $350 on those leases that were probable of collection to ensure that the tenant lease receivables were not overstated. Escrow Deposits The escrow balance as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 was $556 and $711, respectively. Escrow deposits include funds held in escrow to be used for the acquisition of properties in the future and for the payment of taxes and insurance. Deferred Assets The deferred assets balance as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 was $28,907 and $28,208, respectively. The balance as of December 31, 2025 consisted of $28,681 in deferred rent receivables resulting from the recognition of revenue from leases with fixed annual rental escalations on a straight-line basis and $226 of other deferred costs. The balance as of December 31, 2024 consisted of $28,009 in deferred rent receivables resulting from the recognition of revenue from leases with fixed annual rental escalations on a straight-line basis and $199 of other deferred costs. Other Assets The other assets balance as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 was $25,284 and $22,354, respectively. The balance as of December 31, 2025 consisted of $13,102 for right of use assets, $7,784 in net capitalized leasing commissions, $2,551 in capitalized construction in process costs, $1,539 in prepaid assets, and $308 for net capitalized software costs and miscellaneous assets. The balance as of December 31, 2024 consisted of $7,271 for right of use assets, $6,729 in capitalized construction in process costs, $1,451 in prepaid assets, $6,535 in net capitalized leasing commissions, and $368 for net capitalized software costs and miscellaneous assets. Refer to Note 8 – “Leases” for additional details on right of use assets. Derivative Instruments - Interest Rate Swaps The derivative assets balance as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 was $6,102 and $18,613, respectively. In accordance with the Company’s risk management strategy, the purpose of the interest rate swaps is to manage interest rate risk for certain of the Company’s variable-rate debt. The interest rate swaps involve the Company’s receipt of variable-rate amounts from the counterparties in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements. The Company accounts for derivative instruments in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” Refer to Note 4 – “Credit Facility, Notes Payable and Derivative Instruments” for additional details. Other Liabilities The other liabilities balance as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 was $19,410 and $14,191 respectively. The balance as of December 31, 2025 consisted of $13,438 for right of use liabilities and $5,972 of prepaid rent. The balance as of December 31, 2024 consisted of $7,461 for right of use liabilities and $6,730 of prepaid rent. Refer to Note 8 – “Leases” for additional details on right of use liabilities. Net Income Attributable to Common Stockholders Per Share The Company uses the treasury stock method to compute diluted net income or loss attributable to common stockholders per share. Basic net income or loss per share of common stock is computed by dividing net income or loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted net income or loss per share of common stock is computed by dividing net income or loss attributable to common stockholders by the sum of the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding plus any potential dilutive shares for the period. OP Units and LTIP Units are not reflected in the diluted per share calculation because the exchange of OP Units and LTIP Units into common stock is on a one-for-one basis, and both are allocated net income on a per share basis equal to the common stock. Accordingly, any exchange would not have any effect on diluted net income available to common stockholders per share. The Company considered the requirements of the two-class method when computing earnings per share and determined that there would be no difference in its reported results if that method was utilized. Debt Issuance Costs Debt issuance costs include amounts paid to lenders and other third parties to obtain both fixed term and revolving debt and are amortized to interest expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the related debt. Refer to Note 4 – “Credit Facility, Notes Payable and Derivative Instruments” for additional details. Related Party Disclosures The Company enters into transactions with affiliated entities, or “related parties,” which are recorded as receivables or payables in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Related party disclosures are governed by ASC Topic 850, “Related Party Disclosures.” Refer to Note 6 – “Related Party Transactions” for additional information regarding the Company’s related party transactions. Stock-Based Compensation The Company grants LTIP Unit awards, including awards that vest over time and awards that vest based on achievement of specified performance criteria, to its employees and its independent directors. The Company accounts for all awards under ASC Topic 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation”. Refer to Note 7 – “Stock Based Compensation” for additional details. Depreciation and Amortization Expense Real estate and related assets are stated net of accumulated depreciation. Renovations, replacements and other expenditures that improve or extend the life of assets are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Expenditures for ordinary maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the buildings, which are generally between 20 and 52 years, tenant improvements, which are generally between one and 19 years, and site improvements, which are generally between three and 15 years. Values assigned to in-place lease and leasing costs intangible assets are charged as amortization expense using the straight-line method over the remaining term of the respective leases. Goodwill ​ As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company’s goodwill balance was $5,903. Goodwill represents the excess of consideration paid over the fair value of underlying identifiable net assets of businesses acquired. The Company’s goodwill balance was derived from the management internalization transaction. Goodwill has an indefinite life and is not amortized, but is tested for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The Company’s policy is to perform its annual goodwill impairment evaluation as of the first day of the fourth quarter of its fiscal year. The Company has one reporting unit. ​ Goodwill is evaluated for impairment either under a qualitative assessment option or a quantitative approach depending on the facts and circumstances of the reporting unit, consideration of the excess of the reporting unit's fair value over its carrying amount in previous assessments and changes in business environment. When performing a qualitative assessment, the Company considers factors including, but not limited to, current macroeconomic conditions, industry and market conditions, cost factors, financial performance and other events relevant to the entity or the reporting unit to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If the Company determines that it is more likely than not that the reporting unit's fair value is less than its carrying amount, a quantitative goodwill impairment test is performed. When performing a quantitative goodwill impairment test, the reporting unit carrying value is compared to its fair value. Goodwill is deemed impaired if, and the impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which, the reporting unit carrying value exceeds its fair value. Estimating the fair value of a reporting unit requires the exercise of significant judgment and assumptions including judgments about expected future cash flows, weighted-average cost of capital, discount rates and expected long-term growth rates. A significant change to these estimates and assumptions could cause the estimated fair values of our reporting unit to decline and increase the risk of an impairment charge to earnings. The Company performed a qualitative analysis during the fourth quarter of the current fiscal year and determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit was in excess of the reporting units carrying value, and as a result, a quantitative step one analysis was not necessary. ​ Unconsolidated Joint Venture In December 2024, the Company entered into an agreement to sell certain assets to a newly formed joint venture, GII Global Medical Holdings LLC (the “Joint Venture”), with the Company through its Operating Partnership and Heitman Global Real Estate REIT LLC (“Heitman”) and their subsidiaries. The Company retained an ownership interest of 12.5% in the Joint Venture with Heitman retaining the remaining 87.5% interest. The Company performed a qualitative analysis, including an evaluation of the Joint Venture's ability to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support. The Company also considered which equity holder in the Joint Venture, if any, has the power to direct the activities most significant to the Joint Venture’s economic performance, whether the equity holders as a group lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest, and whether they have the obligation to absorb losses of the Joint Venture or the right to receive benefits from it that could be significant to the Joint Venture. Based on this analysis, the Company determined that the Joint Venture has sufficient equity investment at risk to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, and that the Joint Venture’s equity holders are obligated to both absorb expected losses and receive expected returns. The Company further concluded that the Joint Venture is structured with substantive voting rights, such that the decisions that most significantly affect the Joint Venture's economic outcome are made relative to the ownership interests of the equity holders. Therefore, the Company determined that the entity should be accounted for under the voting interest model. Heitman, through its voting interest, controls the entity. Accordingly, the Company accounts for its interest in the Joint Venture using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method, the Company initially recorded the investment at cost and subsequently adjusts the investment for the Company’s share of the equity in earnings or losses, as well as for any cash contributions and distributions. The Company’s net equity investment in the unconsolidated Joint Venture is included in the "Investment in unconsolidated joint venture" line item on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company’s share of net income or loss from the Joint Venture is included in the "Equity loss from unconsolidated joint venture" line item on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company uses the cumulative earnings approach to determine the cash flow presentation of distributions from the unconsolidated joint venture. Under this approach, distributions up to the amount of cumulative equity in earnings recognized are classified as cash inflows from operating activities, while distributions in excess of that amount are classified as cash inflows from investing activities. Refer to Note 3 – “Property Portfolio” for additional details regarding the Company’s investment in the Joint Venture. Impairment of Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture During the Company’s ownership of properties that are held in the Joint Venture and accounted for under the equity method and considered unconsolidated entities, the Company recognizes an impairment loss when circumstances indicate that a decrease in the value of an equity method investment has occurred and that it is other than temporary. This determination requires significant judgment. To assess whether the impairment loss is other than temporary, the Company considers its ability and intent to hold the investment until its carrying value is fully recovered. The Company evaluates the impairment of its investment in the unconsolidated Joint Venture in accordance with accounting standards for equity investments. First, the Company reviews the investment for indicators of impairment. If indicators are present, the Company estimates the fair value of the investment. If the carrying value of the investment exceeds the estimated fair value, the Company assesses whether the impairment is temporary or other than temporary. In making this assessment, the Company considers the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the Joint Venture, and the Company’s intent and ability to retain the interest long enough for a recovery in market value. If the Company concludes that the impairment is other than temporary, the investment is reduced to its estimated fair value. Income Taxes The Company elected to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 2016. A REIT is generally not subject to U.S. federal income taxes if it can meet many specific requirements. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, the Company will be subject to U.S. federal and state income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate tax rates, and the Company could not re-elect REIT status until the fifth calendar year after the year in which the failure occurred. Even if the Company continues to qualify as a REIT, it may be subject to certain state or local income taxes, and the Company’s TRS will be subject to U.S. federal, state, and local taxes on its income at regular corporate rates. The Company recognizes the tax effects of uncertain tax positions only if the position is more likely than not to be sustained upon audit, based on the technical merits of the position. The Company has not identified any material uncertain tax positions and recognizes interest and penalties in income tax expense, if applicable. The Company is currently not under examination by any income tax jurisdiction. Fair Value of Financial Instruments Fair value is a market-based measurement and should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. In accordance with ASC Topic 820, the valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels are defined as follows:
| ● | Level 1 - Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets;
| ● | Level 2 - Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument; and
| ● | Level 3 - Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
The Company considers the carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, escrow deposits, accounts and other receivables, and accounts payable and accrued expenses to approximate the fair value for these financial instruments because of the short period of time since origination or the short period of time between origination of the instruments and their expected realization. Due to the short-term nature of these instruments, Level 1 and Level 2 inputs are utilized to estimate the fair value of these financial instruments. The Company considers the carrying value of its debt to approximate fair value. The fair values determined related to the Company’s interest rate swap transactions utilize Level 2 inputs, since there is heavy reliance on a variety of inputs including contractual terms, interest rate curves, yield curves, measure of volatility, and correlations of such inputs. The fair values determined related to the Company’s acquisitions of real estate where the identification and recording of intangible assets and liabilities is required primarily utilize Level 2 inputs since there is heavy reliance on market observable data such as rent comparables, sales comparables, and broker indications. Although some Level 3 inputs are utilized, they are minor in comparison to the Level 2 date used for the primary assumptions as it relates to acquisitions of real estate. Segment Reporting In December 2024, the Company adopted ASU No. 2023-07, “Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures.” ASU No. 2023-07 does not change how a public entity identifies its operating segments, aggregates them or applies the quantitative thresholds to determine its reportable segments and all disclosures required under ASC Topic 280, “Segment Reporting” continue to be required. ASC Topic 280 establishes standards for reporting financial and descriptive information about a public entity’s reportable segments. The Company adopted ASU 2023-07 for its fiscal year 2024 annual financial statements and interim financial statements thereafter and has applied this standard retrospectively for all periods presented. The Company’s adoption of ASU No. 2023-07 did not have a material impact on its financial condition, results of operations or financial statement disclosures. ​ The Company acquires healthcare facilities and leases those facilities to physician groups and regional and national healthcare systems and derives its revenue primarily from the leasing of those facilities. The Company operates and manages its business as one reportable operating segment. Resources are allocated and financial performance is assessed by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, its chief operating decision maker, or the CODM. The CODM is provided with and reviews total consolidated assets and consolidated net income or loss and uses this information to assess the performance of the Company’s portfolio and makes operating decisions accordingly. There are no significant segment operating expenses that require disclosure other than the expense categories on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. ​ New Accounting Pronouncements ​ In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses (“ASU 2024-03”), to address requests from investors for more detailed information about the types of expenses in commonly presented expense captions. ASU 2024-03 requires public companies to provide disaggregated disclosure in tabular format in the notes to financial statements of specific expenses, including but not limited to: (i) employee compensation, (ii) depreciation, and (iii) intangible asset amortization. In January 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-01, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Clarifying the Effective Date, which clarifies that the amendments in ASU 2024-03 are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. The Company is evaluating the impact these ASUs will have on its disclosures.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_AccountingPoliciesAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for all significant accounting policies of the reporting entity. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 235 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/235/tableOfContent Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147483426/235-10-50-1 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_SignificantAccountingPoliciesTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | dtr-types:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration