10-Q 1 a13-19477_110q.htm 10-Q

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to .

Commission File Number: 0-20859

GERON CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE |  | 75-2287752
(State or other jurisdiction of |  | (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) |  | Identification No.)

149 COMMONWEALTH DRIVE, SUITE 2070, MENLO PARK, CA |  | 94025
(Address of principal executive offices) |  | (Zip Code)

(650) 473-7700

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o |  | Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer o |  | Smaller reporting company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |  |

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class: |  | Outstanding at November 1, 2013:
Common Stock, $0.001 par value |  | 128,967,411 shares

Table of Contents

GERON CORPORATION

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS

|  | Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1: | Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | 1
| Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 | 1
| Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 | 2
| Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 | 3
| Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 | 4
| Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | 5
Item 2: | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 14
Item 3: | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 21
Item 4: | Controls and Procedures | 21
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1: | Legal Proceedings | 22
Item 1A: | Risk Factors | 22
Item 2: | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 41
Item 3: | Defaults Upon Senior Securities | 41
Item 4: | Mine Safety Disclosures | 41
Item 5: | Other Information | 41
Item 6: | Exhibits | 41
| SIGNATURE | 42

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

GERON CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(IN THOUSANDS)

|  | SEPTEMBER 30, |  | DECEMBER 31, |
|  | 2013 |  | 2012 |
|  | (UNAUDITED) |  |  |
ASSETS |  |  |  |  |
Current assets: |  |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents |  | $ | 9,591 |  | $ | 22,063 |
Restricted cash |  | 795 |  | 794 |
Marketable securities |  | 56,617 |  | 73,472 |
Interest and other receivables |  | 555 |  | 752 |
Prepaid assets |  | 844 |  | 1,336 |
Total current assets |  | 68,402 |  | 98,417 |
Property and equipment, net |  | 116 |  | 974 |
Deposits and other assets |  | 195 |  | 410 |
|  | $ | 68,713 |  | $ | 99,801 |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |  |  |  |  |
Current liabilities: |  |  |  |  |
Accounts payable |  | $ | 1,547 |  | $ | 3,429 |
Accrued compensation and benefits |  | 2,886 |  | 5,216 |
Accrued restructuring charges |  | 161 |  | 1,972 |
Accrued liabilities |  | 1,985 |  | 3,480 |
Fair value of derivatives |  | 258 |  | 51 |
Total current liabilities |  | 6,837 |  | 14,148 |
Commitments and contingencies |  |  |  |  |
Stockholders’ equity: |  |  |  |  |
Common stock |  | 129 |  | 130 |
Additional paid-in capital |  | 945,241 |  | 939,867 |
Accumulated deficit |  | (883,482 | ) | (854,384 | )
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |  | (12 | ) | 40 |
Total stockholders’ equity |  | 61,876 |  | 85,653 |
|  | $ | 68,713 |  | $ | 99,801 |

See accompanying notes.

1

Table of Contents

GERON CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

|  | THREE MONTHS ENDED |  | NINE MONTHS ENDED |
|  | SEPTEMBER 30, |  | SEPTEMBER 30, |
|  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |
Revenues: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
License fees and royalties |  | $ | 181 |  | $ | 636 |  | $ | 1,058 |  | $ | 2,020 |
Operating expenses: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Research and development |  | 5,338 |  | 11,684 |  | 18,066 |  | 39,568 |
Restructuring charges |  | 116 |  | — |  | 1,032 |  | — |
General and administrative |  | 3,460 |  | 4,829 |  | 11,643 |  | 15,726 |
Total operating expenses |  | 8,914 |  | 16,513 |  | 30,741 |  | 55,294 |
Loss from operations |  | (8,733 | ) | (15,877 | ) | (29,683 | ) | (53,274 | )
Unrealized loss on derivatives |  | (208 | ) | (44 | ) | (207 | ) | (10 | )
Interest and other income |  | 699 |  | 140 |  | 836 |  | 481 |
Interest and other expense |  | (12 | ) | (172 | ) | (44 | ) | (215 | )
Net loss |  | $ | (8,254 | ) | $ | (15,953 | ) | $ | (29,098 | ) | $ | (53,018 | )
Basic and diluted net loss per share |  | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | (0.13 | ) | $ | (0.23 | ) | $ | (0.42 | )
Shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share |  | 128,293,074 |  | 127,236,993 |  | 128,146,333 |  | 126,833,916 |

See accompanying notes.

2

Table of Contents

GERON CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(IN THOUSANDS)

(UNAUDITED)

|  | THREE MONTHS ENDED |  | NINE MONTHS ENDED |
|  | SEPTEMBER 30, |  | SEPTEMBER 30, |
|  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |
Net loss |  | $ | (8,254 | ) | $ | (15,953 | ) | $ | (29,098 | ) | $ | (53,018 | )
Other comprehensive income (loss): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities |  | 1 |  | 10 |  | (52 | ) | 4 |
Foreign currency translation adjustments |  | — |  | — |  | — |  | 16 |
Reclassification of foreign currency translation adjustments |  | — |  | 153 |  | — |  | 153 |
Other comprehensive income (loss) |  | 1 |  | 163 |  | (52 | ) | 173 |
Comprehensive loss |  | $ | (8,253 | ) | $ | (15,790 | ) | $ | (29,150 | ) | $ | (52,845 | )

See accompanying notes.

3

Table of Contents

GERON CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

(IN THOUSANDS)

(UNAUDITED)

|  | NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, |
|  | 2013 |  | 2012 |
Cash flows from operating activities: |  |  |  |  |
Net loss |  | $ | (29,098 | ) | $ | (53,018 | )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |  |  |  |  |
Depreciation and amortization |  | 357 |  | 658 |
Accretion and amortization on investments, net |  | 948 |  | 1,806 |
Gain on sales of property and equipment, net |  | (759 | ) | (32 | )
Loss on write-downs of property and equipment |  | 200 |  | — |
Stock-based compensation for services by non-employees |  | 136 |  | 152 |
Stock-based compensation for employees and directors |  | 3,456 |  | 4,016 |
Amortization related to 401(k) contributions |  | 449 |  | 336 |
Unrealized loss on derivatives |  | 207 |  | 10 |
Changes in assets and liabilities: |  |  |  |  |
Other current and noncurrent assets |  | 904 |  | 1,941 |
Other current liabilities |  | (6,679 | ) | (768 | )
Translation adjustment |  | — |  | 169 |
Net cash used in operating activities |  | (29,879 | ) | (44,730 | )
Cash flows from investing activities: |  |  |  |  |
Restricted cash transfer |  | (1 | ) | (1 | )
Purchases of property and equipment |  | (56 | ) | (854 | )
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment |  | 1,116 |  | 38 |
Purchases of marketable securities |  | (57,446 | ) | (54,905 | )
Proceeds from maturities of marketable securities |  | 73,301 |  | 100,275 |
Net cash provided by investing activities |  | 16,914 |  | 44,553 |
Cash flows from financing activities: |  |  |  |  |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs |  | 493 |  | 80 |
Net cash provided by financing activities |  | 493 |  | 80 |
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |  | (12,472 | ) | (97 | )
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period |  | 22,063 |  | 16,105 |
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period |  | $ | 9,591 |  | $ | 16,008 |

See accompanying notes.

4

Table of Contents

GERON CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2013

(UNAUDITED)

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The terms “Geron”, the “Company”, “we” and “us” as used in this report refer to Geron Corporation. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management of Geron, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2013 or any other period. These financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the financial statements for each of the three years ended December 31, 2012, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2012 has been derived from audited financial statements at that date.

Principles of Consolidation

The 2012 condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Geron and our former wholly-owned subsidiary, Geron Bio-Med Ltd. (Geron Bio-Med), a United Kingdom company. In March 2012, the board of directors and shareholders of Geron Bio-Med approved actions to commence a voluntary winding up of the company. The full wind up of Geron Bio-Med was completed in August 2012. Prior to 2013, we eliminated intercompany accounts and transactions and prepared the financial statements of Geron Bio-Med using the local currency as the functional currency. We translated the assets and liabilities of Geron Bio-Med at rates of exchange at the balance sheet date and translated income and expense items at average monthly rates of exchange. The resultant translation adjustments were included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a separate component of stockholders’ equity.

Net Loss Per Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is calculated based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potential dilutive securities outstanding during the period. Potential dilutive securities primarily consist of outstanding stock options, restricted stock and warrants to purchase common stock and are determined using the treasury stock method at an average market price during the period.

Because we are in a net loss position, diluted loss per share excludes the effects of potential dilutive securities. Had we been in a net income position, diluted earnings per share would have included the shares used in the computation of basic net loss per share as well as an additional 7,183 and 16,061 shares for the 2013 and 2012 periods, respectively, related to outstanding stock options, restricted stock and warrants (as determined using the treasury stock method at the estimated average market value).

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. On a regular basis, management evaluates these estimates and assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities

We consider all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. We are subject to credit risk related to our cash equivalents and marketable securities. We place our cash and cash equivalents in money market funds and cash operating accounts. Our marketable securities include U.S. government-sponsored enterprise securities, commercial paper and corporate notes with original maturities ranging from five to 16 months.

We classify our marketable securities as available-for-sale. We record available-for-sale securities at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity. Realized gains and losses are included in interest and other income and are derived using the specific identification method for determining the cost of securities

5

Table of Contents

GERON CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2013

(UNAUDITED)

sold and have been insignificant to date. Dividend and interest income are recognized when earned and included in interest and other income in our condensed consolidated statements of operations. We recognize a charge when the declines in the fair values below the amortized cost basis of our available-for-sale securities are judged to be other-than-temporary. We consider various factors in determining whether to recognize an other-than-temporary charge, including whether we intend to sell the security or whether it is more likely than not that we would be required to sell the security. Declines in market value associated with credit losses judged as other-than-temporary result in a charge to interest and other income. Other-than-temporary charges not related to credit losses are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity. No other-than-temporary impairment charges were recorded for our available-for-sale securities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. See Note 2 on Fair Value Measurements.

Fair Value of Derivatives

For non-employee options classified as assets or liabilities, the fair value of these instruments is recorded on the condensed consolidated balance sheet at inception and adjusted to fair value at each financial reporting date. The change in fair value of the non-employee options is recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of operations as unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives. Fair value of non-employee options is estimated using the Black Scholes option-pricing model. The non-employee options continue to be reported as an asset or liability until such time as the instruments are exercised or expire or are otherwise modified to remove the provisions which require this treatment, at which time these instruments are marked to fair value and reclassified from assets or liabilities to stockholders’ equity. For non-employee options classified as permanent equity, the fair value of the non-employee options is recorded in stockholders’ equity as of their respective vesting dates and no further adjustments are made. See Note 2 on Fair Value Measurements.

Revenue Recognition

We have entered into several license agreements with various oncology, diagnostics, research tools, agriculture and biologics production companies. With certain of these agreements, we receive nonrefundable license payments in cash or equity securities, option payments in cash or equity securities, cost reimbursements, milestone payments, royalties on future sales of products, or any combination of these items. Upfront non-refundable signing, license or non-exclusive option fees are recognized as revenue when rights to use the intellectual property related to the license have been delivered and over the term of the agreement if we have continuing performance obligations. Milestone payments, which are subject to substantive contingencies, are recognized upon completion of specified milestones, representing the culmination of the earnings process, according to contract terms. Royalties are generally recognized upon receipt of the related royalty payment. Deferred revenue represents the portion of research and license payments received which has not been earned. When payments are received in equity securities, we do not recognize any revenue unless such securities are determined to be realizable in cash. We recognize revenue under collaborative agreements as the related research and development services are rendered.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash consists of funds maintained in separate certificate of deposit accounts for specified purposes. The components of restricted cash were as follows:

|  | September 30, |  | December 31, |
(In thousands) |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |
Certificate of deposit for unused equipment line of credit |  | $ | 530 |  | $ | 530 |
Certificate of deposit for credit card purchases |  | 265 |  | 264 |
|  | $ | 795 |  | $ | 794 |

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses consist of expenses incurred in identifying, developing and testing product candidates resulting from our independent efforts as well as efforts associated with collaborations. These expenses include, but are not limited to, acquired in-process research and development deemed to have no alternative future use, payroll and personnel expense, lab supplies, preclinical studies, clinical trials, including support for investigator-sponsored clinical trials, raw materials to manufacture clinical trial drugs, manufacturing costs for research and clinical trial materials, sponsored research at other labs, consulting, costs to maintain technology licenses and research-related overhead. Research and development costs are expensed as incurred, including payments made under our license agreements.

6

Table of Contents

GERON CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2013

(UNAUDITED)

Clinical Trial Costs

A significant component of our research and development expenses is clinical trial costs. Substantial portions of our preclinical studies and all of our clinical trials have been performed by third-party contract research organizations, or CROs, and other vendors. We accrue expenses for preclinical studies performed by our vendors based on certain estimates over the term of the service period and adjust our estimates as required. We accrue expenses for clinical trial activities performed by CROs based upon the estimated amount of work completed on each study. For clinical trial expenses, the significant factors used in estimating accruals include the number of patients enrolled, the number of active clinical sites and the duration for which the patients have been enrolled in the study. Pass through costs from CROs include, but are not limited to, regulatory expenses, investigator fees, lab fees, travel costs and other miscellaneous costs, including shipping and printing fees. We accrue pass through costs based on estimates of the amount of work completed for the clinical trial. We monitor patient enrollment levels and related activities to the extent possible through internal reviews, review of contractual terms and correspondence with CROs. We base our estimates on the best information available at the time. However, additional information may become available to us which would allow us to make a more accurate estimate in future periods. In this event, we may be required to record adjustments to research and development expenses in future periods when the actual level of activity becomes more certain.

Depreciation and Amortization

We record property and equipment at cost and calculate depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally four years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the estimated useful life or remaining term of the lease.

Stock-Based Compensation

We recognize stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period. The following table summarizes the stock-based compensation expense related to stock options, restricted stock awards and employee stock purchases for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 which was allocated as follows:

|  | Three Months Ended |  | Nine Months Ended |
|  | September 30, |  | September 30, |
(In thousands) |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |
Research and development |  | $ | 483 |  | $ | 594 |  | $ | 1,394 |  | $ | 1,861 |
Restructuring charges |  | — |  | — |  | 28 |  | — |
General and administrative |  | 739 |  | 669 |  | 2,034 |  | 2,155 |
Stock-based compensation expense included in operating expenses |  | $ | 1,222 |  | $ | 1,263 |  | $ | 3,456 |  | $ | 4,016 |

Modifications to the post-termination exercise period of outstanding options held by certain members of our executive management team resulted in additional stock-based compensation expense of $205,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013. In addition, stock-based compensation expense has been recognized for the modification of the post-termination exercise period for certain stock options previously granted to employees affected by the April 2013 restructuring. Stock-based compensation resulting from these modifications has been reflected in the table above. See Note 3 on Restructurings for a further discussion of the April 2013 restructuring.

As stock-based compensation expense recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures, but at a minimum, reflects the grant-date fair value of those awards that actually vested in the period. Forfeitures have been estimated at the time of grant based on historical data and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.

7

Table of Contents

GERON CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2013

(UNAUDITED)

Stock Options

We grant options with service-based vesting under our equity plans to employees, non-employee directors and consultants. The vesting period for employee options is generally four years. The fair value of options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 has been estimated at the date of grant using the Black Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

|  | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|  | 2013 |  | 2012 |
Dividend yield |  | None |  | None |
Expected volatility range |  | 0.742 to 0.759 |  | 0.631 to 0.726 |
Risk-free interest rate range |  | 0.80% to 1.81% |  | 0.81% to 1.25% |
Expected term |  | 6 yrs |  | 6 yrs |

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

The fair value of employees’ purchase rights during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 has been estimated using the Black Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

|  | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|  | 2013 |  | 2012 |
Dividend yield |  | None |  | None |
Expected volatility range |  | 0.506 to 1.391 |  | 0.458 to 0.774 |
Risk-free interest rate range |  | 0.09% to 0.21% |  | 0.06% to 0.21% |
Expected term range |  | 6 - 12 mos |  | 6 - 12 mos |

Dividend yield is based on historical cash dividend payments. The expected volatility range is based on historical volatilities of our stock since traded options on Geron stock do not correspond to option terms and the trading volume of options is limited. The risk-free interest rate range is based on the U.S. Zero Coupon Treasury Strip Yields for the expected term in effect on the date of grant for an award. The expected term of options is derived from actual historical exercise and post-vesting cancellation data and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The expected term of employees’ purchase rights is equal to the purchase period.

Restricted Stock Awards

We grant restricted stock awards to employees and non-employee directors with three types of vesting schedules: (i) service-based, (ii) performance-based or (iii) market-based. Service-based restricted stock awards generally vest annually over four years. Performance-based restricted stock awards vest upon achievement of discrete strategic corporate goals within a specified performance period, generally three years. Market-based restricted stock awards vest upon achievement of certain market price thresholds of our common stock within a specified performance period, generally three years.

The fair value for service-based restricted stock awards is determined using the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant. The fair value is amortized as stock-based compensation expense over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally the vesting period, on a straight-line basis and is reduced for estimated forfeitures, as applicable.

The fair value for performance-based restricted stock awards is determined using the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant. Stock-based compensation expense for awards with vesting based on performance conditions is recognized over the period from the date the performance condition is determined to be probable of occurring through the date the applicable condition is expected to be met and is reduced for estimated forfeitures, as applicable. If the performance condition is not considered probable of being achieved, no stock-based compensation expense is recognized until such time as the performance condition is considered probable of being met, if at all. If that assessment of the probability of the performance condition being met changes, the impact of the change in estimate would be recognized in the period of the change. If the requisite service period has been met prior to the change in estimate, the effect of the change in estimate would be immediately recognized. We have not recognized any stock-based compensation expense for performance-based restricted stock awards in our condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 as the achievement of the specified performance criteria was not considered probable during that time.

The fair value for market-based restricted stock awards is determined using a lattice valuation model with a Monte Carlo simulation. The model takes into consideration the historical volatility of our stock and the risk-free interest rate at the date of grant. In addition, the model is used to estimate the derived service period for the awards. The derived service period is the estimated period of time that would be required to satisfy the market condition, assuming the market condition will be satisfied. Stock-based compensation expense is recognized over the derived service period for the awards using the straight-line method and is reduced for estimated forfeitures, as applicable, but is accelerated if the market condition is achieved earlier than estimated. All market-based restricted stock awards have been cancelled as of September 30, 2013 as the market conditions were not achieved within the specified performance period.

8

Table of Contents

GERON CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2013

(UNAUDITED)

Non-Employee Stock-Based Awards

For our non-employee stock-based awards, the measurement date on which the fair value of the stock-based award is calculated is equal to the earlier of (i) the date at which a commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instrument is reached or (ii) the date at which the counterparty’s performance is complete. We recognize stock-based compensation expense for the fair value of the vested portion of non-employee awards in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.

2. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

We categorize financial instruments recorded at fair value on our condensed consolidated balance sheets based upon the level of judgment associated with inputs used to measure their fair value. The categories are as follows:

Level 1 — |  | Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date. An active market for an asset or liability is a market in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.
Level 2 — |  | Inputs (other than quoted market prices included in Level 1) are either directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability through correlation with market data at the measurement date and for the duration of the instrument’s anticipated life.
Level 3 — |  | Inputs reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. Consideration is given to the risk inherent in the valuation technique and the risk inherent in the inputs to the model.

A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Below is a description of the valuation methodologies used for financial instruments measured at fair value on our condensed consolidated balance sheets, including the category for such financial instruments.

Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities Available-for-Sale

Certificates of deposit and money market funds are categorized as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy as their fair values are based on quoted prices available in active markets. U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. government-sponsored enterprise securities, municipal securities, corporate notes and commercial paper are categorized as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy as their fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or discounted cash flows.

Cash equivalents, restricted cash and marketable securities by security type at September 30, 2013 were as follows:

|  |  |  | Gross |  | Gross |  |  |
|  | Amortized |  | Unrealized |  | Unrealized |  | Estimated |
|  | Cost |  | Gains |  | Losses |  | Fair Value |
|  | (In thousands) |
Included in cash and cash equivalents: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Money market funds |  | $ | 5,997 |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 5,997 |
Restricted cash: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Certificates of deposit |  | $ | 795 |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 795 |
Marketable securities (due in less than 1 year): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Government-sponsored enterprise securities |  | $ | 7,319 |  | $ | 1 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 7,320 |
Commercial paper |  | 15,741 |  | 9 |  | — |  | 15,750 |
Corporate notes |  | 33,569 |  | — |  | (22 | ) | 33,547 |
|  | $ | 56,629 |  | $ | 10 |  | $ | (22 | ) | $ | 56,617 |

9

Table of Contents

GERON CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2013

(UNAUDITED)

Cash equivalents, restricted cash and marketable securities by security type at December 31, 2012 were as follows:

|  |  |  | Gross |  | Gross |  |  |
|  | Amortized |  | Unrealized |  | Unrealized |  | Estimated |
|  | Cost |  | Gains |  | Losses |  | Fair Value |
|  | (In thousands) |
Included in cash and cash equivalents: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Money market funds |  | $ | 15,660 |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 15,660 |
Corporate notes |  | 3,136 |  | — |  | (1 | ) | 3,135 |
|  | $ | 18,796 |  | $ | — |  | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 18,795 |
Restricted cash: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Certificates of deposit |  | $ | 794 |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 794 |
Marketable securities (due in less than 1 year): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Government-sponsored enterprise securities |  | $ | 8,618 |  | $ | 5 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 8,623 |
Commercial paper |  | 20,623 |  | 21 |  | — |  | 20,644 |
Corporate notes |  | 44,190 |  | 22 |  | (7 | ) | 44,205 |
|  | $ | 73,431 |  | $ | 48 |  | $ | (7 | ) | $ | 73,472 |

Marketable securities with unrealized losses at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were as follows:

|  | Less Than 12 Months |  | 12 Months or Greater |  | Total |
|  |  |  | Gross |  |  |  | Gross |  |  |  | Gross |
|  | Estimated |  | Unrealized |  | Estimated |  | Unrealized |  | Estimated |  | Unrealized |
|  | Fair Value |  | Losses |  | Fair Value |  | Losses |  | Fair Value |  | Losses |
|  | (In thousands) |
As of September 30, 2013: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Corporate notes (due in less than 1 year) |  | $ | 31,654 |  | $ | (22 | ) | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 31,654 |  | $ | (22 | )
As of December 31, 2012: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Corporate notes (due in less than 1 year) |  | $ | 27,045 |  | $ | (8 | ) | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 27,045 |  | $ | (8 | )

The gross unrealized losses related to corporate notes as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were due to changes in interest rates. We determined that the gross unrealized losses on our marketable securities as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were temporary in nature. We review our investments quarterly to identify and evaluate whether any investments have indications of possible impairment. Factors considered in determining whether a loss is temporary include the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than the cost basis and whether we intend to sell the security or whether it is more likely than not that we would be required to sell the security. We currently do not intend to sell these securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis.

Derivatives

Non-employee options are normally traded less actively, have trade activity that is one way, and/or traded in less-developed markets and are therefore valued based upon models with significant unobservable market parameters, resulting in Level 3 categorization.

Options held by non-employees whose performance obligations are complete are classified as derivative liabilities on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. Upon the exercise of these options, the instruments are marked to fair value and reclassified from derivative liabilities to stockholders’ equity. There were no reclassifications from current liabilities to stockholders’ equity for non-employee option exercises during 2013.

As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the following non-employee options to purchase common stock were considered derivatives and classified as current liabilities:

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  | At September 30, 2013 |  | At December 31, 2012 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Number |  | Fair |  | Number |  | Fair |
Issuance |  | Exercise |  | Exercisable |  | Expiration |  | of |  | Value |  | of |  | Value |
Date |  | Price |  | Date |  | Date |  | Shares |  | (In thousands) |  | Shares |  | (In thousands) |
March 2005 |  | $ | 6.39 |  | January 2007 |  | March 2015 |  | 284,600 |  | $ | 258 |  | 284,600 |  | $ | 51 |

10

Table of Contents

GERON CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2013

(UNAUDITED)

The fair value of derivatives has been calculated at each reporting date using the Black Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

|  | September 30, 2013 |  | December 31, 2012 |
Dividend yield |  | None |  | None |
Expected volatility |  | 0.955 |  | 0.828 |
Risk-free interest rate |  | 0.33% |  | 0.25% |
Expected term |  | 2 yrs |  | 2 yrs |

Dividend yield is based on historical cash dividend payments. The expected volatility is based on historical volatilities of our stock since traded options on Geron stock do not correspond to derivatives’ terms and trading volume of Geron options is limited. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Zero Coupon Treasury Strip Yields for the expected term of the derivatives in effect on the reporting date. The expected term of derivatives is equal to the remaining contractual term of the instruments.

Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following table presents information about our financial instruments that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2013 and indicates the fair value category assigned.

|  | Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using |
|  | Quoted Prices in |  | Significant |  |  |  |  |
|  | Active Markets |  | Other |  | Significant |  |  |
|  | for Identical |  | Observable |  | Unobservable |  |  |
|  | Assets / Liabilities |  | Inputs |  | Inputs |  |  |
(In thousands) |  | Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3 |  | Total |
Assets |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Money market funds (1) |  | $ | 5,997 |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 5,997 |
Government-sponsored enterprise securities (2) |  | — |  | 7,320 |  | — |  | 7,320 |
Commercial paper (2) |  | — |  | 15,750 |  | — |  | 15,750 |
Corporate notes (2) |  | — |  | 33,547 |  | — |  | 33,547 |
Total |  | $ | 5,997 |  | $ | 56,617 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 62,614 |
Liabilities |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Derivatives (3) |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 258 |  | $ | 258 |

(1) Included in cash and cash equivalents on our condensed consolidated balance sheets.

(2) Included in current marketable securities on our condensed consolidated balance sheets.

(3) Included in fair value of derivatives on our condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Changes in Level 3 Recurring Fair Value Measurements

The table below includes a rollforward of the balance sheet amounts for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, including the change in fair value, for financial instruments in the Level 3 category. When a determination is made to classify a financial instrument within Level 3, the determination is based upon the significance of the unobservable parameters to the overall fair value measurement. However, Level 3 financial instruments typically include, in addition to the unobservable components, observable components (that is, components that are actively quoted and can be validated to external sources). Accordingly, the gains and losses in the table below include changes in fair value due in part to observable factors that are part of the methodology.

11

Table of Contents

GERON CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2013

(UNAUDITED)

|  |  |  | Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
|  |  |  | Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Change in |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Unrealized Loss |
|  |  |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Related to |
|  |  |  | Unrealized |  |  |  |  |  | Transfers |  |  |  | Financial |
|  | Fair Value at |  | Loss |  | Purchases |  |  |  | In and/or |  | Fair Value at |  | Instruments |
|  | June 30, |  | Included in |  | and |  | Sales and |  | Out of |  | September 30, |  | Held at |
(In thousands) |  | 2013 |  | Earnings (1) |  | Issuances |  | Settlements |  | Level 3 |  | 2013 |  | September 30, 2013 (1) |
Derivative liabilities |  | $ | 50 |  | $ | 208 |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 258 |  | $ | 208 |

|  |  |  | Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
|  |  |  | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Change in |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Unrealized Loss |
|  |  |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Related to |
|  |  |  | Unrealized |  |  |  |  |  | Transfers |  |  |  | Financial |
|  | Fair Value at |  | Loss |  | Purchases |  |  |  | In and/or |  | Fair Value at |  | Instruments |
|  | December 31, |  | Included in |  | and |  | Sales and |  | Out of |  | September 30, |  | Held at |
(In thousands) |  | 2012 |  | Earnings (1) |  | Issuances |  | Settlements |  | Level 3 |  | 2013 |  | September 30, 2013 (1) |
Derivative liabilities |  | $ | 51 |  | $ | 207 |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 258 |  | $ | 207 |

(1) Reported as unrealized loss on derivatives in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.

3. RESTRUCTURINGS

On April 25, 2013, we announced the decision to discontinue our discovery research programs and companion diagnostics program based on telomere length and close our research laboratory facility located at 200 Constitution Drive, Menlo Park, California. With this decision, a total of 20 positions were eliminated. In connection with this restructuring, we expect to record aggregate restructuring charges of approximately $1,500,000, of which $940,000 was recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2013. As of September 30, 2013, the restructuring charges recognized under the April 2013 restructuring included $624,000 related to one-time termination benefits, including $28,000 of non-cash stock-based compensation expense relating to the extension of the post-termination exercise period through the end of December 2013 for certain stock options previously granted to terminated employees, $200,000 related to non-cash charges for write-downs of excess equipment and leasehold improvements and $116,000 related to costs associated with the closure of our research laboratory facility. The remaining projected restructuring charges relate to costs associated with the closure of our research laboratory facility and are expected to be recorded in the fourth quarter of 2013. We expect the restructuring will result in aggregate cash expenditures of approximately $1,250,000, of which $571,000 has been paid as of September 30, 2013 and related to one-time termination benefits and facility-related charges. The remaining cash expenditures are expected to be paid in the fourth quarter of 2013 and relate to facility-related charges. As of September 30, 2013, we have received proceeds of $1,000,000 from the sale of excess laboratory equipment in connection with the closure of our research laboratory facility. We may incur other charges associated with the April 2013 restructuring. Such charges, if any, will be recorded as they are determined.

On December 3, 2012, we announced the decision to discontinue development of GRN1005. With this decision, a total of 43 positions were eliminated. As of September 30, 2013, we have recognized aggregate restructuring charges of $2,794,000 for the December 2012 restructuring, of which $2,702,000 was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2012 and $92,000 was recorded in the first half of 2013. All actions associated with the December 2012 restructuring were completed in the first half of 2013, and we do not anticipate incurring any further charges in connection with the December 2012 restructuring.

On November 14, 2011, we announced the decision to focus on the development of our oncology programs and consequently, we discontinued further development of our stem cell programs. With this decision, a total of 66 positions were eliminated. All actions associated with the November 2011 restructuring were completed in 2012, and we do not anticipate incurring any further charges in connection with the November 2011 restructuring. All payments due under the November 2011 restructuring were made as of June 30, 2013.

The components relating to the April 2013, December 2012 and November 2011 restructurings, including the outstanding restructuring liability which is included in accrued restructuring charges on our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2013, are summarized in the following table:

(In thousands) |  | Employee Severance and Other Benefits |  | Asset Write Downs |  | Facility Related Charges |  | Total |
Beginning accrual balance as of December 31, 2012 |  | $ | 1,972 |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 1,972 |
Restructuring charges |  | 716 |  | 200 |  | 116 |  | 1,032 |
Cash payments |  | (2,373 | ) | — |  | (96 | ) | (2,469 | )
Adjustments or non-cash credits, including stock-based compensation expense |  | (174 | ) | (200 | ) | — |  | (374 | )
Ending accrual balance as of September 30, 2013 |  | $ | 141 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 20 |  | $ | 161 |

12

Table of Contents

GERON CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2013

(UNAUDITED)

4. SEGMENT INFORMATION

Our executive management team represents our chief decision maker. We view our operations as one segment, the discovery and development of therapeutic products for oncology. As a result, the financial information disclosed herein materially represents all of the financial information related to our principal operating segment.

5. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS DATA

Supplemental schedule of non-cash operating and investing activities:

|  | Nine Months Ended |
|  | September 30, |
(In thousands) |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |
Supplemental Operating Activities: |  |  |  |  |
Issuance of common stock for 401(k) matching contributions |  | $ | 839 |  | $ | 1,361 |
Issuance of common stock for services rendered to date or to be received in future periods |  | — |  | 69 |
Reclassification of deposits to other current assets, net |  | 219 |  | 135 |
Supplemental Investing Activities: |  |  |  |  |
Net unrealized (loss) gain on available-for-sale securities |  | (52 | ) | 4 |

6. SUBSEQUENT EVENT

On October 1, 2013, we closed the transaction to divest our human embryonic stem cell assets and our autologous cellular immunotherapy program pursuant to the terms of the previously disclosed Asset Contribution Agreement, or the Agreement, we entered into in January 2013 with BioTime, Inc., or BioTime, and BioTime’s wholly owned subsidiary, Asterias Biotherapeutics, Inc., or Asterias (formerly known as BioTime Acquisition Corporation).

Under the terms of the Agreement, on October 1, 2013, we contributed to Asterias our human embryonic stem cell assets, including intellectual property, human embryonic stem cell lines and other assets related to our discontinued human embryonic stem cell programs, including our Phase I clinical trial of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells, or GRNOPC1, in patients with acute spinal cord injury, as well as our autologous cellular immunotherapy program, including data from the Phase I/II clinical trial of the autologous cellular immunotherapy in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia. On October 1, 2013, Asterias assumed all post-closing liabilities with respect to all of the assets contributed by us, including any liabilities related to the GRNOPC1 and autologous cellular immunotherapy clinical trials. Additionally, Asterias was substituted for us as a party in an appeal by us of two rulings in favor of ViaCyte, Inc. by the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, filed by us in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in September 2012, or the ViaCyte Appeal, and Asterias assumed all liabilities arising after October 1, 2013 with respect to the ViaCyte Appeal.

As consideration for the contribution of our human embryonic stem cell assets and autologous cellular immunotherapy program to Asterias, on October 1, 2013 we received 6,537,779 shares of Asterias Series A common stock representing 21.4% of Asterias’ outstanding common stock as a class as of that date. We are also entitled to receive royalties from Asterias on the sale of products that are commercialized, if any, in reliance upon the patents we contributed to Asterias. Under the terms of the Agreement and subject to applicable law, following a record date to be declared by our board of directors, we will distribute all of the shares of Asterias Series A common stock to our stockholders on a pro rata basis, other than with respect to fractional shares and shares that would otherwise be distributed to Geron stockholders residing in certain to-be-determined excluded jurisdictions, which shares, as required by the Agreement, will be sold with the net cash proceeds therefrom distributed ratably to the stockholders who would otherwise be entitled to receive such shares.

On October 1, 2013, BioTime contributed to Asterias 8,902,077 shares of BioTime common stock, five-year warrants to purchase 8,000,000 additional shares of BioTime common stock at an exercise price of $5.00 per share, or the BioTime Warrants, minority stakes in two of BioTime’s subsidiaries and rights to use certain human embryonic stem cell lines. In addition, BioTime had previously loaned Asterias $5,000,000 in cash and the principal amount of this debt was cancelled as part of the closing of the Agreement. In consideration of BioTime’s contributions, on October 1, 2013 Asterias issued to BioTime 21,773,340 shares of Asterias Series B common stock representing 71.6% of Asterias’ outstanding common stock as a class as of that date, and three-year warrants to purchase 3,150,000 additional shares of Asterias Series B common stock at an exercise price of $5.00 per share. Upon completion of the distribution of the Asterias Series A common stock to our stockholders, Asterias is contractually obligated under the Agreement to distribute the BioTime Warrants on a pro rata basis to the holders of Asterias Series A common stock.

13

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that, if they never materialize or prove incorrect, could cause the results of Geron Corporation, or Geron or the Company, to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of terminology such as “may,” “expect,” “plan,” “intend,” “will,” “should,” “project,” “believe,” “predict,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “potential” or “continue,” or the negative thereof or other comparable terminology. These statements are within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements appear throughout the Form 10-Q and are statements regarding our intent, belief, or current expectations, primarily with respect to our operations and related industry developments. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this Form 10-Q. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the risks faced by us and described in Part II, Item 1A, entitled “Risk Factors,” and in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part I, Item 2 of this Form 10-Q.

OVERVIEW

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q and with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2013.

We are a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company developing a first-in-class telomerase inhibitor, imetelstat, in hematologic myeloid malignancies. The discovery and early development of imetelstat was based on our core expertise in telomerase and telomere biology. Telomerase is an enzyme that enables cancer cells to maintain telomere length, which provides them with the capacity for limitless cellular replication. Imetelstat is a potent and specific inhibitor of telomerase. Based on clinical data we obtained in late 2012, we may develop imetelstat to treat one or more hematologic myeloid malignancies such as myelofibrosis, or MF, which includes patients with primary MF, or PMF, post-essential thrombocythemia MF, or post-ET MF, or post-polycythemia vera MF, or post-PV MF, all of which are referred to in this report as MF; myelodysplastic syndromes, or MDS; or acute myelogenous leukemia, or AML.

We have incurred operating losses every year since our operations began in 1990. Losses have resulted principally from costs incurred in connection with our research and development activities and from general and administrative costs associated with our operations. As of September 30, 2013, we had an accumulated deficit of $883.5 million. Since inception, we have primarily financed our operations through the sale of equity securities, interest income on our marketable securities and payments we received under our collaborative and licensing arrangements.

Substantially all of our revenues to date have been research support payments under collaboration agreements and milestones, royalties and other revenues from our licensing arrangements. Any revenues generated from collaboration agreements, and revenues from our licensing arrangements, will not be sufficient alone to continue or expand our research or development activities and otherwise sustain our operations. We also currently have no source of product revenue. Imetelstat, which is our only product candidate, will require significant additional clinical testing prior to possible regulatory approval in the United States and other countries, and we do not expect imetelstat to be commercially available for many years, if at all.

As of September 30, 2013, we had cash, restricted cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of $67.0 million compared to $96.3 million at December 31, 2012. We estimate that our existing capital resources, amounts available to us under our equipment financing facility and future interest income will be sufficient to fund our current level of operations through at least the next 12 months. However, our future capital requirements will be substantial, and we may use our available capital resources sooner than we anticipate.

Development of Imetelstat in Hematologic Myeloid Malignancies

In November 2012, Dr. Ayalew Tefferi of Mayo Clinic initiated an investigator-sponsored trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of imetelstat in patients with MF, and to determine an appropriate dose and schedule for further evaluation. This investigator-sponsored trial, or the Myelofibrosis IST, is an open-label trial in patients with PMF, post-ET MF, or post-PV MF who have two to three risk factors (intermediate-2) or four or more risk factors (high risk) as defined by the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring

14

Table of Contents

System Plus, or DIPSS Plus, described by Gangat, et al, in the Journal of Clinical Oncology (2011). The primary endpoint is overall response rate, which is defined by the proportion of patients who are classified as “responders”, which means that they have achieved either a clinical improvement, or CI, partial remission, or PR, or complete remission, or CR, consistent with the criteria of the 2013 International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment, or IWG-MRT (Tefferi, et al., Blood 2013). Secondary endpoints include reduction of spleen size, improvement in anemia or inducement of red blood cell transfusion independence, safety and tolerability.

The investigator has informed us that more than fifty patients have been enrolled in the Myelofibrosis IST. Enrollment of the first 11 patients in the first cohort of MF patients (Cohort A) in which the dose of imetelstat is given once every three weeks was completed at the end of March 2013 and the pre-specified criteria in the clinical protocol of at least two responders in the first 11 patients were met to enable expanded enrollment. Enrollment of the first 11 patients of the second cohort of MF patients (Cohort B) in which imetelstat was given weekly for four weeks, followed by one dose every three weeks was completed in May 2013 and the pre-specified criteria in the clinical protocol of at least two responders in the first 11 patients were met to enable expanded enrollment. In addition, the investigator has informed us that enrollment has commenced in additional cohorts to evaluate the safety and efficacy of imetelstat using different dosing algorithms, as well as to evaluate imetelstat in different patient populations, including patients with MF that has transformed into AML, or blast-phase MF, and certain subpopulations of myelodysplastic syndromes/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN), or MDS. We may determine to initiate pilot studies in other hematologic myeloid malignancies, including MDS and/or AML.

Certain preliminary data from patients enrolled in Cohort A and Cohort B of the ongoing Myelofibrosis IST have been selected for presentation in an oral session at the 55 th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition to be held in New Orleans, Louisiana from December 7-10, 2013. The presentation is scheduled to occur on Monday, December 9, 2013 at 4:45 p.m. CST. The preliminary data selected by the investigator was submitted as an abstract by the investigator to ASH in August 2013.

We expect the investigator’s presentation at ASH to include additional and updated safety and efficacy data from patients enrolled in Cohort A and Cohort B of the ongoing Myelofibrosis IST. Because the additional and updated safety and efficacy data may be materially different from the preliminary data selected and interpreted by the investigator and reported in the abstract, such preliminary data should be considered carefully and with caution. Since the ongoing Myelofibrosis IST is an investigator-sponsored trial, we do not have control over the data, the investigator’s interpretation of the data or the timing and reporting of data from this trial. Please refer to the risk factor entitled, “Risks Related to Our Business—Success in early clinical trials may not be indicative of results in subsequent clinical trials. Likewise, data reported by investigators from time-to-time is subject to audit and verification procedures that could result in material differences to final data and may change as more patient data becomes available.” in Part II, Item 1A entitled, “Risk Factors”, in this Form 10-Q.

Any future Geron-sponsored clinical trial in patients with MF will take into consideration the available safety and efficacy results from the Myelofibrosis IST, as well as any previous or current Geron-sponsored clinical trials and other investigator-sponsored trials of imetelstat, and will be necessary for future clinical development of imetelstat in MF. Although observed toxicities and other safety issues have not resulted to date in an unacceptable benefit-risk profile in our Phase 2 clinical trials of imetelstat in ET or multiple myeloma, or in the Myelofibrosis IST, if there are safety results that cause the benefit-risk profile to become unacceptable with respect to patients enrolled in clinical trials of imetelstat conducted now or in the future by us or any independent investigator, including the Myelofibrosis IST, we would likely be delayed or prevented from advancing imetelstat into further clinical development. Please refer to the risk factor entitled, “Risks Related to Our Business— If imetelstat were to have an unacceptable benefit-risk profile, our business and prospects could be severely harmed.” in Part II, Item 1A entitled, “Risk Factors”, in this Form 10-Q.

Completion of Divestiture of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Assets

On October 1, 2013, we closed the transaction to divest our human embryonic stem cell assets and our autologous cellular immunotherapy program pursuant to the terms of the previously disclosed Asset Contribution Agreement, or the Agreement, we entered into in January 2013 with BioTime, Inc., or BioTime, and BioTime’s wholly owned subsidiary, Asterias Biotherapeutics, Inc., or Asterias (formerly known as BioTime Acquisition Corporation).

Under the terms of the Agreement, on October 1, 2013, we contributed to Asterias our human embryonic stem cell assets, including intellectual property, proprietary technology, materials, equipment, reagents, contracts, regulatory filings, our Phase I clinical trial of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells, or GRNOPC1, in patients with acute spinal cord injury, and our autologous cellular immunotherapy program, including data from the Phase I/II clinical trial of the autologous cellular immunotherapy in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia. On October 1, 2013, Asterias assumed all post-closing liabilities with respect to all of the assets contributed by us, including any liabilities related to the GRNOPC1 and autologous cellular immunotherapy clinical trials.

15

Table of Contents

Additionally, Asterias was substituted for us as a party in an appeal by us of two rulings in favor of ViaCyte, Inc. by the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, filed by us in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in September 2012, or the ViaCyte Appeal, and Asterias assumed all liabilities arising after October 1, 2013 with respect to the ViaCyte Appeal.

As consideration for the contribution of our human embryonic stem cell assets and autologous cellular immunotherapy program to Asterias, on October 1, 2013 we received 6,537,779 shares of Asterias Series A common stock representing 21.4% of Asterias’ outstanding common stock as a class as of that date. We are also entitled to receive royalties from Asterias on the sale of products that are commercialized, if any, in reliance upon the patents we contributed to Asterias. Under the terms of the Agreement and subject to applicable law, following a record date to be declared by our board of directors, we will distribute all of the shares of Asterias Series A common stock to our stockholders on a pro rata basis, other than with respect to fractional shares and shares that would otherwise be distributed to Geron stockholders residing in certain to-be-determined excluded jurisdictions, which shares, as required by the Agreement, will be sold with the net cash proceeds therefrom distributed ratably to the stockholders who would otherwise be entitled to receive such shares.

On October 1, 2013, BioTime contributed to Asterias 8,902,077 shares of BioTime common stock, five-year warrants to purchase 8,000,000 additional shares of BioTime common stock at an exercise price of $5.00 per share, or the BioTime Warrants, minority stakes in two of BioTime’s subsidiaries and rights to use certain human embryonic stem cell lines. In consideration of BioTime’s contributions, on October 1, 2013 Asterias issued to BioTime 21,773,340 shares of Asterias Series B common stock representing 71.6% of Asterias’ outstanding common stock as a class as of that date, and three-year warrants to purchase 3,150,000 additional shares of Asterias Series B common stock at an exercise price of $5.00 per share. Upon completion of the distribution of the Asterias Series A common stock to our stockholders, Asterias is contractually obligated under the Agreement to distribute the BioTime Warrants on a pro rata basis to the holders of Asterias Series A common stock.

Discontinuation of Discovery Research and Companion Diagnostics Programs and Closure of Research Laboratory Facility

In April 2013, in connection with our decision to discontinue our discovery research program and companion diagnostics program based on telomere length and close our research laboratory facility, we announced a restructuring to reduce our workforce from 64 positions to 44 full-time positions, representing a reduction of approximately 31% of our workforce. We anticipate we will incur aggregate restructuring charges of approximately $1.5 million, of which $940,000 was recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The aggregate projected restructuring charges, the majority of which were recognized in the second quarter of 2013, consist of approximately $624,000 related to one-time termination benefits, comprised principally of severance payments, benefit continuation costs, outplacement services and non-cash stock-based compensation expense associated with the elimination of 20 positions and approximately $650,000 for facility-related charges as well as approximately $200,000 for non-cash charges related to write-downs of equipment and leasehold improvements. As of September 30, 2013, we have received proceeds of approximately $1.0 million from the sale of excess laboratory equipment in connection with the closure of our research laboratory facility. We may incur other charges in connection with this restructuring and will record these expenses in the appropriate period as they are determined. See Note 3 on Restructurings in Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for further discussion of the restructuring charges.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

There have been no significant changes in our critical accounting policies and estimates during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the critical accounting policies and estimates disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 that materially impact our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Our condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Note 1 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q describes the significant accounting policies used in the preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Estimates and assumptions about future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions believed to be applicable and reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates may change as new events occur, as additional information is obtained and as our operating environment changes. These changes historically have been minor and have been included in the condensed consolidated financial statements as soon as they became known. Based on a critical assessment of our accounting policies and the underlying judgments and uncertainties affecting the application of those policies, management believes that our condensed consolidated financial statements are fairly stated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and present a meaningful presentation of our financial condition and results of operations.

16

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Our results of operations have fluctuated from period to period and may continue to fluctuate in the future, based upon the progress of our research and development efforts and variations in the level of expenses related to developmental efforts during any given period. Results of operations for any period may be unrelated to results of operations for any other period. In addition, historical results should not be viewed as indicative of future operating results. We are subject to risks common to companies in our industry and at our stage of development, including, but not limited to, risks inherent in our research and development efforts, uncertainty of preclinical and clinical trial results or regulatory approvals or clearances, need for future capital, enforcement of our patent and proprietary rights, reliance upon our collaborators, investigators and other third parties, and potential competition. In order for a product candidate to be commercialized based on our research, we and our collaborators must conduct preclinical tests and clinical trials, demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our sole product candidate, imetelstat, obtain regulatory approvals or clearances and enter into manufacturing, distribution and marketing arrangements, as well as obtain market acceptance. We do not expect to receive revenues or royalties based on imetelstat for many years, if at all.

Revenues

We have entered into license and option agreements with companies involved with oncology, diagnostics, research tools, agriculture and biologics production. In each of these agreements, we have granted certain rights to our technologies. In connection with the agreements, we are eligible to receive license fees, option fees, milestone payments and royalties on future sales of products, or any combination thereof. We recognized license fee revenues of $117,000 and $782,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, compared to $538,000 and $1.0 million for the comparable 2012 periods related to our various agreements. The decrease in license fee revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the comparable 2012 periods primarily reflected the full recognition of a license payment from GE Healthcare UK, Limited, or GE Healthcare, in 2012 upon the exercise of an option to expand the scope of their original license agreement with us to obtain exclusive global rights to intellectual property and know-how for the development and sale of cellular assays derived from induced pluripotent stem cells. In connection with the closing of the divestiture of our human embryonic stem cell assets on October 1, 2013, our license agreement with GE Healthcare, including any future revenue payments thereunder, was transferred to Asterias.

We recognized royalty revenues of $64,000 and $276,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, compared to $98,000 and $1.0 million for the comparable 2012 periods on product sales of telomerase detection and telomere measurement kits to the research-use-only market, cell-based research products and nutritional products. The decrease in royalty revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to comparable 2012 periods primarily reflected the assignment of our telomerase activation technology to Telomerase Activation Sciences, Inc. in December 2012 and termination of our license agreement with Asia Biotech Corporation. Future royalty obligations by Asia Biotech Corporation were terminated as of December 2012.

Current revenues may not be predictive of future revenues. Future license and royalty revenues are dependent upon additional agreements being signed and current agreements being maintained.

Research and Development Expenses

For each of our research and development programs, we incur direct external, personnel related and other research and development costs. Direct external expenses primarily consist of costs to outside parties to perform laboratory studies, develop manufacturing processes and manufacture raw materials and clinical trial drug materials, conduct and manage clinical trials, including investigator-sponsored clinical trials, and provide advice and consultation for scientific and clinical strategies. Personnel related expenses primarily consist of salaries and wages, stock-based compensation, payroll taxes and benefits for those individuals involved with ongoing research and development efforts. Other research and development expenses primarily consist of laboratory supplies, research-related overhead associated with leasing, operating and maintaining our facilities and equipment depreciation and maintenance. These costs apply to our clinical programs, preclinical programs as well as our discovery research efforts. A product candidate is designated a clinical candidate once an investigational new drug application has been filed with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or a similar filing with regulatory agencies outside the United States, for the purpose of commencing clinical trials in humans. Preclinical programs include product candidates undergoing toxicology, pharmacology, metabolism and efficacy studies and manufacturing process development required before testing in humans can commence.

17

Table of Contents

Research and development expenses were $5.3 million and $18.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, compared to $11.7 million and $39.6 million for the comparable 2012 periods. As shown in the table below, the decrease in research and development expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the comparable 2012 periods primarily reflected lower direct external research and development costs for the manufacturing of drug products and reduced clinical trial expenses resulting from the wind-down of our imetelstat trials in metastatic breast cancer and advanced non-small cell lung cancer and our GRN1005 trials in patients with brain metastases. The decrease in research and development expenses also reflected lower personnel related costs resulting from the recent restructurings as well as reduced costs for scientific supplies and services with the discontinuation of our discovery research programs. Overall, we expect research and development expenses for 2013 to be lower as compared to 2012 as a result of our decision to focus our resources on the development of imetelstat in hematologic myeloid malignancies.

Research and development expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

|  | Three Months Ended |  | Nine Months Ended |
|  | September 30, |  | September 30, |
(In thousands) |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |  | 2013 |  | 2012 |
|  | (Unaudited) |
Direct external research and development expenses: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Clinical program: Imetelstat |  | $ | 1,913 |  | $ | 2,828 |  | $ | 4,645 |  | $ | 10,974 |
Clinical program: GRN1005 (1) |  | 36 |  | 2,199 |  | 1,087 |  | 7,595 |
Clinical program: GRNOPC1 (2) |  | 44 |  | 54 |  | 199 |  | 298 |
Preclinical programs |  | 1 |  | 348 |  | 225 |  | 883 |
Personnel related expenses |  | 2,059 |  | 4,419 |  | 8,556 |  | 14,403 |
All other research and development expenses |  | 1,285 |  | 1,836 |  | 3,354 |  | 5,415 |
Total |  | $ | 5,338 |  | $ | 11,684 |  | $ | 18,066 |  | $ | 39,568 |

(1) In December 2012, we discontinued the GRN1005 program and returned the asset to Angiochem, Inc. in May 2013.

(2) On October 1, 2013, we closed the transaction to divest our human embryonic stem cell assets and our autologous cellular immunotherapy program to Asterias. Asterias assumed all post-closing liabilities with respect to all of the assets contributed by us, including any liabilities related to the GRNOPC1 and autologous cellular immunotherapy clinical trials. See Note 6 on Subsequent Event in Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for further information.

At this time, we cannot provide reliable estimates of how much time or investment will be necessary to commercialize imetelstat. For a more complete discussion of the risks and uncertainties associated with the development of imetelstat, see the sub-sections entitled, “Risks Related to Our Business” and “Risks Related to Clinical and Commercialization Activities”, in Part II, Item 1A entitled, “Risk Factors”, in this Form 10-Q.

Restructuring Charges

In April 2013, we announced the decision to discontinue our discovery research programs and companion diagnostics program based on telomere length and close our research laboratory facility located at 200 Constitution Drive, Menlo Park, California. With this decision, a total of 20 positions were eliminated. In connection with this restructuring, we expect to record aggregate restructuring charges of approximately $1.5 million, of which $940,000 was recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2013. As of September 30, 2013, the restructuring charges recognized for the April 2013 restructuring included $624,000 related to one-time termination benefits, including $28,000 of non-cash stock-based compensation expense relating to the extension of the post-termination exercise period through the end of December 2013 for certain stock options previously granted to terminated employees, $200,000 related to non-cash charges for write-downs of excess equipment and leasehold improvements and $116,000 related to costs associated with the closure of our research laboratory facility. The remaining projected restructuring charges for the April 2013 restructuring relate to costs associated with the closure of our research laboratory facility and are expected to be recorded in the fourth quarter of 2013. As of September 30, 2013, we have received proceeds of $1.0 million from the sale of excess laboratory equipment in connection with the closure of our research laboratory facility. We may incur other charges associated with the April 2013 restructuring. Such charges, if any, will be recorded as they are determined.

In December 2012, we announced the decision to discontinue development of GRN1005. With this decision, a total of 43 positions were eliminated. As of September 30, 2013, we have recognized aggregate restructuring charges of approximately $2.8 million for the December 2012 restructuring, of which $2.7 million was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2012 and $92,000 was recorded in the first half of 2013. All actions associated with the December 2012 restructuring were completed in the first half of 2013, and we do not anticipate incurring any further charges in connection with the December 2012 restructuring. See Note 3 on Restructurings in Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for further discussion of the restructuring charges.

18

Table of Contents

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses were $3.5 million and $11.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, compared to $4.8 million and $15.7 million for the comparable 2012 periods. The decrease in general and administrative expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the comparable 2012 periods primarily reflected lower personnel related expenses resulting from the recent restructurings, reduced legal costs associated with our patent portfolio and lower costs for consulting services.

Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivatives

Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives reflects a non-cash adjustment for changes in fair value of options held by non-employees that are classified as current liabilities. Derivatives classified as assets or liabilities are marked to fair value at each financial reporting date with any resulting unrealized gain (loss) recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. We incurred unrealized losses on derivatives of $208,000 and $207,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, compared to unrealized losses of $44,000 and $10,000 for the comparable 2012 periods. The increase in unrealized losses on derivatives for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the comparable 2012 periods primarily reflected the higher fair value of derivative liabilities resulting from the increase in the market value of our stock and changes in other inputs factored into the estimate of their fair value such as the volatility of our stock. See Note 2 on Fair Value Measurements in Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for further discussion of the fair value of derivatives.

Interest and Other Income

Interest income was $47,000 and $184,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, compared to $140,000 and $481,000 for the comparable 2012 periods. The decrease in interest income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the comparable 2012 periods reflected lower cash and investment balances resulting from the use of cash for operations. Interest earned in future periods will depend on the size of our securities portfolio and prevailing interest rates.

Other income was $652,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 representing a net gain on the sale of excess laboratory equipment in connection with the closure of our research laboratory facility. No comparable amounts were recognized for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Interest and Other Expense

Interest and other expense was $12,000 and $44,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, compared to $172,000 and $215,000 for the comparable 2012 periods. The decrease in interest and other expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the comparable 2012 periods was primarily due to the recognition of accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments in connection with the dissolution of Geron Bio-Med in August 2012 and reduced bank charges as a result of lower cash and investment balances in 2013.

Net Loss

Net loss was $8.3 million and $29.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, compared to $16.0 million and $53.0 million for the comparable 2012 periods. The decrease in net loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the comparable 2012 periods was primarily due to reduced research and development expenses as a result of the wind-down of our imetelstat trials in metastatic breast cancer and advanced non-small cell lung cancer and our GRN1005 trials in patients with brain metastases. The decrease in net loss also reflected lower personnel related costs resulting from the recent restructurings as well as reduced costs for scientific supplies and services with the discontinuation of our discovery research programs.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash, restricted cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities at September 30, 2013 were $67.0 million, compared to $96.3 million at December 31, 2012. We have an investment policy to invest these funds in liquid, investment grade securities, such as interest-bearing money market funds, certificates of deposit, municipal securities, U.S. government and agency securities, corporate notes and commercial paper. Our investment portfolio does not contain securities with exposure to sub-prime mortgages, collateralized debt obligations, asset-backed securities or auction rate securities and, to date, we have not recognized any other-than-temporary impairment on our marketable securities or any significant changes in aggregate fair value that would impact our cash

19

Table of Contents

resources or liquidity. To date, we have not experienced lack of access to our invested cash and cash equivalents; however, access to our invested cash and cash equivalents may be impacted by adverse conditions in the financial and credit markets. The decrease in cash, restricted cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities in 2013 was the result of cash being used for operations.

In October 2012, we entered into an At-The-Market Issuance Sales Agreement, or sales agreement, with MLV & Co. LLC, or MLV, which provides that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions and limitations set forth in the sales agreement, we may elect to issue and sell shares of our common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $50.0 million from time to time through MLV as our sales agent. We are not obligated to make any sales of common stock under the sales agreement. To date, we have not sold any common stock pursuant to the sales agreement.

We estimate that our existing capital resources, amounts available to us under our equipment financing facility and future interest income will be sufficient to fund our current level of operations through at least the next 12 months. However, our future capital requirements will be substantial. Changes in our research and development plans or other changes affecting our operating expenses or cash balances may result in the unexpected expenditure of available resources. Factors that may require us to use our available capital resources sooner than we anticipate include:

· the accuracy of the assumptions underlying our estimates for our capital needs for the remainder of 2013 and beyond;

· changes in our clinical development plans for imetelstat;

· our ability to meaningfully reduce manufacturing costs of imetelstat;

· the magnitude and scope of our imetelstat research and development program, including the number of indications we intend to pursue;

· the progress made, if any, in our imetelstat research and development program, including our potential future clinical trials and existing or future investigator-sponsored trials;

· our ability to establish, enforce and maintain strategic arrangements for research, development, clinical testing, manufacturing and marketing of imetelstat;

· the time and costs involved in obtaining regulatory clearances and approvals; and

· the costs involved in preparing, filing, prosecuting, maintaining, defending and enforcing patent claims.

If our existing capital resources, equipment financing arrangement and future interest income are insufficient to meet future capital requirements, we will need to raise additional capital to fund our operations. We anticipate that we will need to seek additional funding through public or private equity financings, including pursuant to our sales agreement with MLV, equipment loans or other financing sources that may be available, including debt financings or collaborative and licensing arrangements. However, we may be unable to raise sufficient additional capital when we need it, on favorable terms or at all. Our ability to raise additional funds may be severely impaired if imetelstat fails to show adequate safety or efficacy in clinical testing, including the Myelofibrosis IST. If we are unable to obtain adequate funds on reasonable terms, we may be required to curtail operations significantly or obtain funds by entering into financing, supply or collaboration agreements on unattractive terms or we may be required to relinquish rights to technology or imetelstat or to grant licenses on terms that are unfavorable to us.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities. Net cash used in operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was $29.9 million and $44.7 million, respectively. The decrease in net cash used in operations in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily reflected reduced operating expenses due to the wind-down of our imetelstat trials in metastatic breast cancer and advanced non-small cell lung cancer and our GRN1005 trials in patients with brain metastases and recent restructurings.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities. Net cash provided by investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was $16.9 million and $44.6 million, respectively. The decrease in net cash provided by investing activities in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily reflected higher purchases of marketable securities and lower proceeds from maturities of marketable securities.

As of September 30, 2013 we had approximately $500,000 available for borrowing under our equipment financing facility. We renewed the commitment for this equipment financing facility in 2009 to further fund equipment purchases. If we are unable to renew the commitment in the future, we will use our existing cash resources to fund capital expenditures.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities. Net cash provided by financing activities was $493,000 and $80,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Net cash provided by financing activities in 2013 and 2012 reflected receipt of cash from the issuance of common stock under our employee equity plans.

20

Table of Contents

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

None.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, there were no material changes to our market risk disclosures as set forth in Part II, Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We have established disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded, based on the evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures by our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as of the end of the period covered by this report, that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting for the three months ended September 30, 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance, and not absolute assurance, that the objectives of the system are met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals in all future circumstances. Accordingly, our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of our disclosure control system are met and, as set forth above, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded, based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that the objectives of our disclosure control system were met.

21

Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

None.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Our business is subject to various risks, including those described below. You should carefully consider these risk factors, together with all of the other information included in this Form 10-Q and our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, or the Form 10-K. Any of these risks could materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. We have marked with an asterisk (*) those risks described below that reflect substantive changes from, or additions to, the risks described under Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” included in the Form 10-K. In addition, the risk factors entitled: “Any further development of imetelstat in solid tumors with short telomeres is dependent upon confirmation of the magnitude of the treatment effect of imetelstat in NSCLC patients whose tumors have short telomeres, and our ability to refine or validate a telomere length assay and to obtain any rights to third-party intellectual property that may be necessary for commercial use”, “If we are not able to fully complete the divestiture of our stem cell assets, our stock price may decline and our business may be adversely affected”, “Our ability to successfully complete the divestiture of our stem cell assets depends at least in part on our ability to maintain our stem cell-related intellectual property”, and “Our failure to meet our obligations under license agreements could result in us losing rights to key technologies required to complete the divestiture of our stem cell assets” that appeared in the Form 10-K have been removed.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS

Our success is solely dependent on the success of one early-stage product candidate, imetelstat, and we cannot be certain that imetelstat will advance to subsequent clinical trials or receive regulatory approval on a timely basis, or at all.*

Our business is at an early stage of development, and we are solely dependent on the success of imetelstat, our sole product candidate. We do not have any products that are commercially available. Our ability to develop imetelstat to and through regulatory approval and commercial launch is subject to significant risks and uncertainties and our ability to, among other things:

· receive positive safety and efficacy data from existing and potential future investigator-sponsored trials of imetelstat, such as the Myelofibrosis IST, that provide the clinical rationale for the potential development of imetelstat in hematologic myeloid malignancies;

· ascertain that the use of imetelstat does not result in significant systemic or organ toxicities or other safety issues resulting in an unacceptable benefit-risk profile;

· develop clinical plans for, and successfully enroll and complete, potential subsequent clinical trials of imetelstat in hematologic myeloid malignancies;

· collaborate successfully with clinical trial sites, academic institutions, clinical research organizations, physician investigators, including any physician investigators conducting investigator-sponsored trials of imetelstat, and other third parties;

· obtain positive clinical data from potential future Geron-sponsored clinical trials to enable subsequent clinical trials;

· obtain required regulatory clearances and approvals for imetelstat; for example, it is uncertain how the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, and regulatory authorities in other countries will interpret the safety and any CI, PR and CR efficacy data from the Myelofibrosis IST; whether the FDA and other regulatory authorities will require us to obtain and submit additional preclinical, manufacturing, or clinical data to proceed with any subsequent Geron-sponsored clinical trials; the scope and type of clinical development and other data they might require us to generate and submit before they might grant a marketing approval, if any; and the length of time and cost for us to complete any such requirements;

· enter into arrangements with third parties to provide services needed to further research and develop imetelstat, or to manufacture imetelstat, in each case at commercially reasonable costs;

· enter into arrangements with third parties, or establish internal capabilities, to provide sales, marketing and distribution functions in compliance with applicable laws;

22

Table of Contents

· obtain appropriate coverage and reimbursement levels for the cost of imetelstat from governmental authorities, private health insurers and other third party payers;

· maintain and enforce adequate intellectual property protection for imetelstat;

· maintain adequate financial resources and personnel to advance imetelstat to and through subsequent clinical trials, regulatory approval and commercial launch; and

· obtain financing on commercially reasonable terms to fund our operations.

If we are not able to successfully achieve the above-stated goals and overcome other challenges that we may encounter in the research, development, manufacturing and commercialization of imetelstat, we may be forced to abandon our development of imetelstat, which would severely harm our business and could potentially cause us to cease operations.

We are currently focused on the development of imetelstat in hematologic myeloid malignancies, other than ET, and future Geron-sponsored clinical development of imetelstat is highly dependent on the results of existing and potential future investigator-sponsored trials of imetelstat in hematologic myeloid malignancies, including the Myelofibrosis IST. We may be unable to develop, or initiate the development of, imetelstat in any additional hematologic myeloid malignancy indications, which would likely result in our decision to discontinue development of imetelstat and to potentially cease operations. In any event, imetelstat will require significant additional clinical testing prior to possible regulatory approval in the United States and other countries, and we do not expect imetelstat to be commercially available for many years, if at all. Our clinical development program for imetelstat may not lead to regulatory approval from the FDA, and similar foreign regulatory agencies if we fail to demonstrate that imetelstat is safe and effective. We may therefore fail to commercialize imetelstat. Any failure to advance imetelstat to subsequent clinical trials, failure to obtain regulatory approval of imetelstat, or limitations on any regulatory approval that we might receive, would severely harm our business and prospects, and could potentially cause us to cease operations.

Our ability to generate product revenue is dependent on the successful regulatory approval and commercialization of imetelstat. Imetelstat may not prove to be more effective for treating hematologic cancers than current therapies. Competitors or other third parties may also have proprietary rights that prevent us from developing and marketing imetelstat, or our competitors may discover or commercialize similar, superior or lower-cost products that make imetelstat unsuitable for marketing. Imetelstat also may not be able to be manufactured in commercial quantities at an acceptable cost. Any of the factors discussed above could delay or prevent us from developing, commercializing or marketing imetelstat, which would materially adversely affect our business and could potentially cause us to cease operations.

If imetelstat were to have an unacceptable benefit-risk profile, our business and prospects could be severely harmed.*

Although toxicities and other safety issues to date have not resulted in an unacceptable benefit-risk profile in our Phase 2 clinical trials of imetelstat in ET or multiple myeloma, or in the Myelofibrosis IST, if there are safety results that cause the benefit-risk profile to become unacceptable with respect to patients enrolled in clinical trials of imetelstat conducted now or in the future by us or any independent investigator, including the Myelofibrosis IST, we would likely be delayed or prevented from advancing imetelstat into further clinical development and may decide to discontinue our development of imetelstat, which would severely harm our business and prospects, and would likely cause us to cease operations. Imetelstat may prove to have undesirable or unintended side effects or other characteristics adversely affecting its safety, efficacy or cost effectiveness that could prevent or limit its approval for marketing and successful commercial use, or that could delay or prevent the commencement and/or completion of clinical trials for imetelstat. For example, in our Phase 1 clinical trials of imetelstat, we observed dose-limiting toxicities, including reduced platelet count, or thrombocytopenia, when the drug was used as a single agent, and reduced white blood cell count, or neutropenia, when the drug was used in combination with paclitaxel, as well as a low incidence of severe infusion reactions. In our Phase 2 clinical trials of imetelstat in ET, multiple myeloma and solid tumors, we have observed hematologic toxicities, abnormal laboratory liver function tests, and non-laboratory test findings such as gastrointestinal events, infections, muscular and joint pain and fatigue. Hematologic toxicities have also occurred in the Myelofibrosis IST, including febrile neutropenia and profound thrombocytopenia. We may in the future observe or report dose-limiting or hematologic toxicities or other safety issues in our ongoing Phase 2 clinical trials of imetelstat in ET and multiple myeloma or in potential future Geron or investigator-sponsored trials of imetelstat. Likewise, because the investigator has reported certain preliminary data from the Myelofibrosis IST only as of August 2013, we expect that the investigator will present at ASH additional and updated data regarding toxicities and safety issues in the Myelofibrosis IST. If such toxicities or other safety issues result in an unacceptable benefit-risk profile, this would likely delay or prevent the commencement and/or completion of our ongoing or potential subsequent clinical trials or investigator-sponsored trials, including the Myelofibrosis IST, and may require us to conduct additional, unforeseen trials or to abandon our development of imetelstat entirely.

23

Table of Contents

Success in early clinical trials may not be indicative of results in subsequent clinical trials. Likewise, data reported by investigators from time-to-time is subject to audit and verification procedures that could result in material differences to final data and may change as more patient data becomes available.*

A number of new drugs and biologics have shown promising results in initial clinical trials, but subsequently failed to establish sufficient safety and efficacy data to obtain necessary regulatory approvals. Data obtained from preclinical and clinical activities are subject to varying interpretations, which may delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval.

Data from our preclinical studies and Phase 1 and Phase 2 clinical trials of imetelstat, as well as preliminary, additional or updated data from investigator-sponsored trials, including the Myelofibrosis IST, should not be relied upon as evidence that subsequent or larger-scale clinical trials will succeed. The positive results we have obtained from the patients enrolled in the Phase 2 trial of imetelstat in ET may not predict the future therapeutic benefit of imetelstat, if any, in other hematologic myeloid malignancies, including MF. For example, the known dose-limiting toxicities associated with imetelstat, such as profound thrombocytopenia and febrile neutropenia and other safety issues, that have been observed in both Geron and investigator-sponsored trials, including the Myelofibrosis IST, could cause complexities in treating patients with MF and could result in the discontinuation of any of these trials.

In addition, the safety and efficacy data from the first two cohorts of the Myelofibrosis IST reported by the investigator in an abstract submitted to ASH in August 2013 are preliminary, and therefore, the final data may be materially different from the preliminary data. The preliminary data is also subject to the risk that one or more of the clinical outcomes may materially change as patient treatment and enrollment continue and additional and updated patient data becomes available. Because the additional and updated safety and efficacy data may be materially different from the preliminary data selected and interpreted by the investigator and reported in the abstract, such preliminary data should be considered carefully and with caution. Additional and updated data is subject to our audit and verification procedures which could result in material differences from the data reported by the investigator, and therefore additional or updated data should be considered carefully and with caution.

Material adverse changes in final data could significantly harm our business prospects. Even if final safety and efficacy data from the Myelofibrosis IST are positive, significant additional clinical testing will be necessary for the future development of imetelstat in MF. Any such final safety and efficacy data from the Myelofibrosis IST may not be reproducible in future clinical trials.

We will be required to demonstrate through larger-scale Phase 3 clinical trials that imetelstat is safe and effective for use in a diverse population before we can seek regulatory approval for its commercial sale. There is typically an extremely high rate of attrition from the failure of drug candidates proceeding through clinical trials. If we are unable to develop imetelstat in future clinical trials, including Phase 3 clinical trials, our business may fail.

Our research and development of imetelstat is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties.*

The science and technology of telomere biology, telomerase and our proprietary oligonucleotide chemistry are relatively new. There is no precedent for the successful commercialization of a therapeutic product candidate based on these technologies. We must undertake significant research and development activities to develop imetelstat based on these technologies, which will require significant additional funding and may take years to accomplish, if at all.

Because of the significant scientific, regulatory and commercial milestones that must be reached for our research and development of imetelstat to be successful, our development of imetelstat in hematologic myeloid malignancies, including MF, or any other indication, may be delayed or abandoned, even after we have expended significant resources on it. Our decisions to discontinue our Phase 2 clinical trial of imetelstat in metastatic breast cancer in September 2012, and to discontinue our development of imetelstat in solid tumors with short telomeres in April 2013, are examples of this. Any further delay or abandonment of our development of imetelstat in hematologic myeloid malignancies would have a material adverse effect on, and likely result in the failure of, our business.

Our stockholders may realize little or no value from the divestiture of our stem cell assets, and as a result our stock price may decline, we could be subject to litigation, and our business may be adversely affected.*

The completion of our obligations under the Agreement among us, BioTime and Asterias covering the disposition of our former stem cell assets is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties. We may be unable to complete, on a timely basis or at all, the pro rata distribution by us of the Asterias Series A common stock received by us from Asterias under the Agreement or we may be unable to pay, in a timely manner or at all, cash in lieu of either fractional shares or shares that would otherwise be distributed to stockholders in certain to-be-determined excluded jurisdictions, in each case as contemplated by the Agreement. Prior to our ability to set a record date for the distribution, we must receive notice from BioTime and Asterias that certain securities registration or qualification requirements have been met by them, which may not occur on a timely basis or at all. Likewise, Asterias may be unable to distribute to the Asterias Series A stockholders the BioTime Warrants received by them from BioTime under the Agreement. These distributions may be delayed or precluded for a variety of reasons, including the failure of BioTime and/or Asterias to obtain or maintain required federal and state registrations and qualifications necessary to enable us to distribute the Asterias Series A common stock and/or to enable Asterias to complete the BioTime Warrants distribution.

24

Table of Contents

In addition, there is currently no existing public market for either the Asterias Series A common stock (or any other Asterias securities) or the BioTime Warrants, and there can be no assurance that an active public market for either the Asterias Series A common stock or BioTime Warrants will ever develop. The absence of an active public market for these securities would make it difficult for holders of Asterias Series A common stock to sell their shares of Asterias Series A common stock or BioTime Warrants and would adversely affect the value of the Asterias Series A common stock and the BioTime Warrants. While Asterias plans to arrange for the trading of the Asterias Series A common stock on the OTC Bulletin Board upon the completion of our distribution of the Asterias Series A common stock, the Asterias Series A common stock may be thinly traded or not at all, and may be subject to the SEC’s “penny stock” rules that impose restrictive sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell penny stocks and provide for certain additional disclosure requirements in connection with the sale of penny stocks. These rules may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity for the Asterias Series A common stock. In addition, until such time as the Asterias Series A common stock is listed on a national securities exchange, which may never occur, applicable state securities laws may restrict the states in which and conditions under which Geron stockholders can sell their shares of Asterias Series A common stock. For these and other reasons, Geron stockholders may not be able to sell their shares of Asterias Series A common stock in a timely manner or at an orderly market price, if at all, and Geron stockholders may otherwise find it difficult to sell their Asterias Series A common stock. In addition, Asterias is a newly organized, development stage company in the start-up phase, and has only recently commenced its operations. To date, Asterias’ operations have been primarily limited to organizing and staffing its company and completing the acquisition of our former stem cell assets. Accordingly, it is difficult if not impossible to predict Asterias’ future performance or to evaluate its business and prospects. For these and other reasons, any value ascribed to the Asterias Series A common stock or the BioTime Warrants is highly speculative.

We expect that the value of Asterias Series A common stock and any cash distributed to Geron stockholders in the distribution will be treated as dividend income for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and the lack of an existing market for the Asterias Series A common stock could limit or preclude the ability of our stockholders to sell a sufficient quantity of Asterias Series A common stock to cover potential tax liabilities. As a result, our stockholders may incur a tax liability, but be unable to realize value from any Asterias Series A common stock distributed by us and/or the BioTime Warrants to be distributed by Asterias. Because no further action is required on the part of Geron stockholders to receive the Asterias Series A common stock and the related BioTime Warrants in the distributions, if the Asterias Series A common stock distribution occurs and Geron stockholders do not want to receive the Asterias Series A common stock and the related BioTime Warrants in the distributions (or cash in lieu thereof), the only recourse for our stockholders will be to divest their Geron common stock prior to the record date set by Geron’s board of directors for the distribution of Asterias Series A common stock. Sales of Geron common stock by stockholders who do not want to receive Asterias Series A common stock and the related BioTime Warrants in the distributions could result in downward pressure on our stock price.

The distribution of the Asterias Series A common stock by us, and the BioTime Warrants by Asterias, and related transactions, as well as the asset contribution transaction itself, could also result in litigation against us, including litigation arising from or related to the value, if any, from the Asterias Series A common stock and/or the BioTime Warrants or our role as a named underwriter with respect to the Asterias Series A distribution, or litigation based on other matters related to the Agreement or the transactions contemplated thereby. For example, some of our investors purchased shares of our common stock because they were interested in the opportunities presented by our human embryonic stem cell programs. Thus, certain stockholders may attribute substantial financial value to our stem cell assets. If our stockholders believe that the financial value which is or may be received by us or them from the divestiture of our former stem cell assets is inadequate, our stock price may decline and litigation may occur. Likewise, those Geron stockholders residing in certain to-be-determined excluded jurisdictions will not receive any Asterias Series A common stock or BioTime Warrants in the distributions and will receive only cash instead, which may be viewed as inadequate, and which will result in those Geron stockholders having no continuing interest in our divested human embryonic stem cell programs as stockholders or otherwise, which could also result in litigation against us. As a result of these and other factors, we may be exposed to a number of risks, including declines or fluctuations in our stock price, additional advisor and legal fees, and distractions to our management caused by activities undertaken in connection with resolving any disputes related to the transaction. The occurrence of any one or more of the above could have an adverse impact on our business and financial condition.

25

Table of Contents

RISKS RELATED TO CLINICAL AND COMMERCIALIZATION ACTIVITIES

The ability to conduct and complete potential future Geron-sponsored or any investigator-sponsored trials of imetelstat on a timely basis is subject to risks and uncertainties related to factors such as performance by investigator-sponsors, availability of drug supply, patient enrollment, and regulatory authorization.*

Delays or terminations of our potential future clinical trials and of investigator-sponsored trials could be caused by matters such as:

· lack of effectiveness of imetelstat during clinical trials or results that do not demonstrate statistically significant efficacy;

· safety issues, side effects or dose-limiting toxicities, including any additional or more severe safety issues related to imetelstat which may be observed in Geron-sponsored or investigator-sponsored trials, whether or not in the same indications or therapeutic areas;

· disruptions due to drug supply or quality issues;

· failure by independent physicians conducting existing or future investigator-sponsored trials of imetelstat to timely commence, enroll, complete or report data from such investigator-sponsored trials;

· not receiving timely regulatory clearances or approvals in any jurisdiction, whether within or outside of the United States, including, for example, not receiving acceptance of new manufacturing specifications or procedures or clinical trial protocol amendments by regulatory authorities, or not otherwise obtaining regulatory clearance to commence subsequent clinical trials;

· not receiving timely institutional review board or ethics committee approval of clinical trial protocols or protocol amendments;

· delays in patient enrollment due to size and nature of patient population, nature of protocols, proximity of patients to clinical sites, availability of effective treatments for the relevant disease and eligibility criteria for the trial;

· difficulty in obtaining or accessing necessary clinical data, including from the Myelofibrosis IST, which may result in incomplete data sets;

· unavailability of any study-related treatment (including comparator therapy);

· lack of adequate funding to continue any clinical trial, including funding requirements resulting from unforeseen costs due to enrollment delays or discontinued participation by patients;

· issues with key vendors of clinical services, such as contract research organizations and laboratory service providers; or

· governmental or regulatory delays, information requests, clinical holds, and changes in regulatory requirements, policies and guidelines.

Our enrollment goals for future clinical trials of imetelstat, and the enrollment goals of independent physicians conducting existing or future investigator-sponsored trials of imetelstat, may not be met. In addition, our inability to retain, or the inability of independent physicians conducting investigator-sponsored trials of imetelstat to retain, patients who have enrolled in a clinical trial but may be prone to withdraw due to side effects from imetelstat, lack of efficacy or personal issues, or who are lost to further follow-up, could result in clinical trial delays, the inability to complete clinical trials, or incomplete data sets. Further, any of our future clinical trials may be overseen by an internal safety monitoring committee, or ISMC, and an ISMC may determine to delay or suspend one or more of these trials due to safety or futility findings based on events occurring during a clinical trial. Data that we receive from independent physician investigators may be flawed or incomplete if the investigators fail to follow appropriate clinical or quality practices. Delays in timely completion of clinical testing of imetelstat, in clinical trials conducted by us or by independent physician investigators could increase research and development costs and could prevent or would delay us from obtaining regulatory approval for imetelstat, both of which would likely have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, future Geron-sponsored clinical development of imetelstat is dependent on the results of existing and potential future investigator-sponsored trials of imetelstat in hematologic myeloid malignancies, including the Myelofibrosis IST. Accordingly, a delay in the timely completion of or reporting of data from the Myelofibrosis IST could have a material adverse effect on our ability to further develop imetelstat or to advance imetelstat to subsequent clinical trials. Also, adverse safety results from investigator-sponsored trials of imetelstat, including those results that have been reported and those that may in the future be reported from the Myelofibrosis IST, could delay initiation or continuation of Geron-sponsored clinical development of imetelstat.

26

Table of Contents

Delays in the initiation of, or our inability to initiate, subsequent clinical trials of imetelstat could result in increased costs to us and would delay our ability to generate or prevent us from generating revenues.*

We are currently focused on the development of imetelstat in hematologic myeloid malignancies, other than ET, and future Geron-sponsored clinical development of imetelstat is highly dependent on the results of existing and potential future investigator-sponsored trials of imetelstat in hematologic myeloid malignancies, including the Myelofibrosis IST. To date, we have not sponsored any clinical trials evaluating imetelstat in any hematologic myeloid malignancies (other than ET), including MF. Because investigator-sponsored trials are not Geron-sponsored trials, the clinical testing of imetelstat in investigator-sponsored trials requires us to rely on the applicable investigator’s design and conduct of the trial, which we do not control, and it is possible that the FDA or other regulatory agencies will not view these investigator-sponsored trials, including the Myelofibrosis IST, as providing adequate support for future clinical trials, whether controlled by us or third parties, for any one or more reasons, including elements of the design or execution of these investigator-sponsored trials or safety concerns or other trial results. Accordingly, failure by physician investigators to properly design or conduct existing or potential future investigator-sponsored trials of imetelstat could produce results that might delay or prevent us from advancing imetelstat into further clinical development. In addition, we do not have control over the timing and reporting of the data from the Myelofibrosis IST or any other investigator-sponsored trials, nor do we own the data from the trials. Our arrangements with investigators may provide us certain information rights with respect to the trials, including access to and the ability to use and reference the data, including for our own regulatory filings, resulting from the trials. If these obligations are breached by the investigators, or if the data prove to be inadequate compared to the first-hand knowledge we might have gained had the trials been Geron-sponsored clinical trials, or if the data cannot be audited or verified by us, then our ability to design and conduct any Geron-sponsored clinical trials may be adversely affected. Additionally, the FDA or other regulatory agencies may disagree with the sufficiency of our right of reference to the preclinical, manufacturing, or clinical data generated by any investigator-sponsored trials, or our interpretation of preclinical, manufacturing, or clinical data from these investigator-sponsored trials. If so, the FDA or other regulatory agencies may require us to obtain and submit additional preclinical, manufacturing, or clinical data before we may initiate potential future Geron-sponsored clinical trials of imetelstat and/or may not accept such additional data as adequate to initiate any such Geron-sponsored clinical trials. Further, if we are unable to verify, confirm or replicate the results from the Myelofibrosis IST or if negative results are obtained, we would likely be further delayed or prevented from advancing imetelstat into further clinical development and might decide to discontinue our development of imetelstat, which would severely harm our business and prospects, and could potentially cause us to cease operations.

In addition to the matters discussed above, the commencement of subsequent clinical trials for imetelstat could be delayed or abandoned for a variety of reasons, including as a result of failures or delays in:

· commencement, enrollment or completion of clinical trials conducted by physician investigators conducting investigator-sponsored trials, or independent physician investigators promptly or adequately reporting data from such trials;

· demonstrating sufficient safety and efficacy in Phase 2 clinical trials conducted by us or by independent physician investigators to obtain regulatory clearance to commence subsequent clinical trials;

· obtaining sufficient funding;

· manufacturing sufficient quantities of imetelstat;

· producing imetelstat in a manner that meets the quality standards of the FDA and other regulatory agencies;

· ensuring our ability to manufacture imetelstat at acceptable costs for Phase 3 clinical trials and commercialization;

· obtaining clearance or approval of proposed trial designs or manufacturing specifications from the FDA and other regulatory authorities;

· reaching agreement on acceptable terms and on a timely basis, if at all, with collaborators and vendors located in the United States or in foreign jurisdictions, including contract research organizations, laboratory service providers, and the trial sites, on all aspects of clinical trials;

· obtaining institutional review board or ethics committee approval to conduct a clinical trial at a prospective site; and

· securing and successfully screening appropriate subjects for participation in clinical trials.

The occurrence of any of these events could adversely affect our ability to initiate subsequent clinical trials, which could increase our development costs or our ability to generate revenues could be impaired, either of which could adversely impact our financial results and have a material adverse effect on our business.

27

Table of Contents

We may not be able to manufacture imetelstat at costs or scales necessary to conduct our clinical trials or potential future commercialization activities.

Imetelstat is likely to be more expensive to manufacture than most other treatments currently available today or that may be available in the future. The commercial cost of manufacturing imetelstat will need to be significantly lower than our current costs in order for imetelstat to become a commercially successful product. Oligonucleotides are relatively large molecules produced using complex chemistry, and the cost of manufacturing an oligonucleotide like imetelstat is greater than the cost of making typical small-molecule drugs. Our present imetelstat manufacturing processes are conducted at a relatively modest scale appropriate for our ongoing Phase 2 clinical trials and investigator-sponsored trials for which we provide clinical drug supply. We may not be able to achieve sufficient scale increases or cost reductions necessary for successful commercial production of imetelstat. Additionally, given the complexities of our manufacturing processes, the resulting costs that we incur to conduct our clinical trials may be higher than for other comparable treatments, requiring us to expend relatively larger amounts of cash to complete our clinical trials, which would negatively impact our financial condition and could increase our need for additional capital.

Manufacturing imetelstat is subject to process and technical challenges and regulatory risks.

We face numerous risks and uncertainties with regard to manufacturing imetelstat. Regulatory requirements for oligonucleotide products are less well-defined than for small-molecule drugs, and there is no guarantee that we will achieve sufficient product quality standards required for Phase 3 clinical trials or for commercial approval and manufacturing of imetelstat. Changes in our manufacturing processes or formulations for imetelstat that may be made during later stages of clinical development, including during Phase 3 trials, may result in regulatory delays, the need for further clinical trials, rejection of a marketing application, or limitation on marketing authorization by regulatory authorities, which would result in a material adverse effect on our business.

We have never conducted large-scale, Phase 3 clinical trials, nor do we have experience as a company in those areas required for the successful commercialization of imetelstat.

We have never conducted large-scale, Phase 3 clinical trials. We cannot be certain that any large-scale, Phase 3 clinical trials will begin or be completed on time, if at all. Large-scale, Phase 3 clinical trials will likely require one or more additional Geron-sponsored Phase 2 clinical trials and supportive Phase 2 data, additional financial and management resources and reliance on third-party clinical investigators, clinical research organizations, lab service providers, trial sites and consultants. Relying on third-party clinical investigators or clinical research organizations may cause delays that are outside of our control. Any such delays could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We also do not have commercialization capabilities for imetelstat, and we will need to establish sales, marketing and distribution capabilities or establish and maintain agreements with third parties to market and sell imetelstat. Developing internal sales, marketing and distribution capabilities is an expensive and time-consuming process. We may not be able to enter into third-party sales, marketing and distribution agreements on terms that are economically attractive, or at all. Even if we do enter into such agreements, these third parties may not successfully market or distribute imetelstat, which may materially harm our business.

Obtaining regulatory approvals to develop and market imetelstat in the United States and other countries is a costly and lengthy process, and we cannot predict whether or when we will be permitted to develop and commercialize imetelstat.*

Federal, state and local governments in the United States and governments in other countries have significant regulations in place that govern many of our activities and may prevent us from successfully conducting our development efforts or from commercializing imetelstat. The regulatory process, particularly for a biopharmaceutical product candidate like imetelstat, is uncertain, can take many years and requires the expenditure of substantial resources.

Prior to submission of any regulatory application seeking approval to commence commercial sales of imetelstat, we will be required to conduct extensive preclinical and clinical testing. In particular, human pharmaceutical therapeutic product candidates are subject to rigorous requirements of the FDA in the United States and similar health and regulatory authorities in other countries in order to demonstrate safety and efficacy.

28

Table of Contents

Data obtained from preclinical and clinical activities are susceptible to varying interpretations by the FDA or regulatory authorities in other countries that could delay, limit or prevent regulatory agency approvals. For example, different interpretations of data generated in the Myelofibrosis IST by regulators may delay or prevent us from proceeding to, or otherwise enabling us to obtain regulatory clearance for, a subsequent clinical trial of imetelstat in patients with MF or any other hematologic myeloid malignancy. It is uncertain how the FDA and other regulatory authorities in other countries will interpret the safety and any CI, PR and CR efficacy data from the Myelofibrosis IST, including the limited preliminary data reported by the investigator in an abstract submitted to ASH in August 2013, which was only from a small number of patients and then only in the first two cohorts of the trial, which is being conducted by a single investigator and not by us. Therefore, it is also uncertain what type of clinical development data they might require us to generate and submit before we may initiate potential future Geron-sponsored clinical trials of imetelstat; before they might grant a marketing approval, if any; and the length of time and cost for us to complete such requirements. In addition, delays or rejections of regulatory approvals, or limitations in marketing authorizations, may be encountered as a result of changes in regulatory environment or regulatory agency policy during the period of product development and/or the period of review of any application for regulatory agency approval for a product candidate. We do not expect to receive regulatory approvals for imetelstat for many years, if at all.

Imetelstat must receive all relevant regulatory agency approvals before it may be marketed in the United States or other countries. Obtaining regulatory approval is a lengthy, expensive and uncertain process. Because imetelstat involves the application of new technologies and a new therapeutic approach, it may be subject to substantial additional review by various government regulatory authorities, and, as a result, the process of obtaining regulatory approvals for imetelstat may proceed more slowly than for product candidates based upon more conventional technologies, and any approval that we may receive could limit the use of imetelstat.

Delays in obtaining regulatory agency approvals or limitations in the scope of such approvals could:

· significantly harm the commercial potential of imetelstat;

· impose costly procedures upon our activities;

· diminish any competitive advantages that we may attain; or

· adversely affect our ability to receive royalties and generate revenues and profits.

Even if we commit the necessary time and resources, the required regulatory agency approvals may not be obtained for imetelstat. If we obtain regulatory agency approval for imetelstat, this approval may entail limitations on the indicated uses or other aspects of the product label for which it can be marketed that could limit the potential commercial use of imetelstat. The occurrence of any of these events could materially adversely affect our business.

Failure to achieve continued compliance with government regulation over our products, if any, could delay or halt commercialization of our products.

Approved products and their manufacturers are subject to continual review, and discovery of previously unknown problems with a product or its manufacturer may result in restrictions on the product or manufacturer, including withdrawal of the product from the market. The future sale by us of any commercially viable product will be subject to government regulation related to numerous matters, including the processes of:

· manufacturing;

· advertising and promoting;

· selling and marketing;

· labeling; and

· distribution.

If, and to the extent that, we are unable to comply with these regulations, our ability to earn revenues from product sales will be materially and negatively impacted.

29

Table of Contents

Failure to comply with regulatory requirements can result in severe civil and criminal penalties, including but not limited to:

· recall or seizure of products;

· injunction against the manufacture, distribution, sales and marketing of products; and

· criminal prosecution.

The imposition of any of these penalties or other commercial limitations could significantly impair our business, financial condition and results of operations.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR FINANCIAL POSITION AND NEED FOR ADDITIONAL FINANCING

We have a history of losses and anticipate continued future losses, and our continued losses could impair our ability to sustain operations.

We have incurred operating losses every year since our operations began in 1990. As of September 30, 2013, our accumulated deficit was approximately $883.5 million. Losses have resulted principally from costs incurred in connection with our research and development activities and from general and administrative costs associated with our operations. We expect to incur additional operating losses and, as our clinical development activities continue, our operating losses may increase in size.

Substantially all of our revenues to date have been research support payments under collaboration agreements and milestones, royalties and other revenues from our licensing arrangements. We may be unsuccessful in entering into any new corporate collaboration or license agreements that result in revenues, or existing collaboration agreements or license arrangements may be terminated or expire. Any revenues generated from ongoing collaboration agreements and revenues from our licensing arrangements will not be sufficient alone to continue or expand our research or development activities and otherwise sustain our operations.

We also expect to experience negative cash flow for the foreseeable future as we fund our operating losses and capital expenditures. This will result in decreases in our working capital, total assets and stockholders’ equity, which may not be offset by future financings. We will need to generate significant revenues to achieve profitability. We may not be able to generate these revenues, and we may never achieve profitability. Our failure to achieve profitability could negatively impact the market price of our common stock and our ability to sustain operations. Even if we do become profitable, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis.

We will need substantial additional capital to conduct our operations and develop imetelstat, and our ability to obtain the necessary funding is uncertain.*

We will require substantial capital resources in order to conduct our operations and develop imetelstat, and we cannot assure you that our existing capital resources, equipment financing arrangement, future interest income and potential sales of our common stock, including pursuant to our At-The-Market Issuance Sales Agreement with MLV & Co. LLC, will be sufficient to fund future planned operations. The timing and degree of any future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:

· the accuracy of the assumptions underlying our estimates for our capital needs for the remainder of 2013 and beyond;

· changes in our clinical development plans for imetelstat;

· our ability to meaningfully reduce manufacturing costs of imetelstat;

· the magnitude and scope of our imetelstat research and development program, including the number of indications we intend to pursue;

· the progress made, if any, in our imetelstat research and development program, including our potential future clinical trials and existing or future investigator-sponsored trials;

· our ability to establish, enforce and maintain strategic arrangements for research, development, clinical testing, manufacturing and marketing of imetelstat;

· the time and costs involved in obtaining regulatory clearances and approvals; and

· the costs involved in preparing, filing, prosecuting, maintaining, defending and enforcing patent claims.

30

Table of Contents

In addition, changes in our business may occur that would consume available capital resources sooner than we expect. Additional financing through strategic collaborations, public or private equity financings, capital lease transactions or other financing sources may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all. We may raise equity capital at a stock price or on other terms that could result in substantial dilution of ownership for our stockholders. The receptivity of the public and private equity markets to proposed financings is substantially affected by the general economic, market and political climate and by other factors which are unpredictable and over which we have no control. Our ability to raise additional funds may be severely impaired if our product candidate, imetelstat, fails to show adequate safety or efficacy in ongoing or potential subsequent clinical trials, including in the Myelofibrosis IST and other investigator-sponsored trials.

Further, in the event that we obtain additional funds through arrangements with collaborative partners, these arrangements may require us to relinquish some or all of our rights to imetelstat.

If sufficient capital is not available, we may be required to delay, reduce the scope of, suspend or eliminate some or all of the elements of our imetelstat program, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

RISKS RELATED TO PROTECTING OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Our success will depend on our ability to protect our technologies and our product candidate, imetelstat, through patents and other intellectual property rights and to operate without infringing the rights of others.*

Protection of our proprietary technology is critically important to our business. Our success will depend in part on our ability to obtain, enforce and extend our patents and maintain trade secrets, both in the United States and in other countries. If we are unsuccessful in either of these regards, the value of our technologies and imetelstat will be adversely affected, and we may be unable to continue our development of imetelstat. By way of example, we do not yet have issued compound patents for imetelstat in Europe after 2020. Further, our patents may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented, and our patent rights may not provide proprietary protection or competitive advantages to us. In the event that we or our licensors are unsuccessful in obtaining and enforcing patents, we may not be able to further develop or commercialize imetelstat and our business may be negatively impacted, and we may be unable to continue our operations.

Publication of discoveries in scientific or patent literature tends to lag behind actual discoveries by at least several months and sometimes several years. Therefore, the persons or entities that we or our licensors name as inventors in our patents and patent applications may not have been the first to invent the inventions disclosed in the patent applications or patents, or the first to file patent applications for these inventions. As a result, we may not be able to obtain patents for discoveries that we otherwise would consider patentable and that we consider to be extremely significant to our future success.

The patent positions of pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical companies, including ours, are highly uncertain and involve complex legal and technical questions. In particular, legal principles for biotechnology and pharmaceutical patents in the United States and in other countries are evolving, and the extent to which we will be able to obtain patent coverage to protect our technologies and imetelstat, or enforce issued patents, is uncertain. If we infringe the patents of others, we may be blocked from continuing development work or be required to obtain licenses on terms that may impact the value of imetelstat or cause it to be commercially impracticable.

In addition, on September 16, 2011, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, or the AIA, was signed into law. The AIA includes a number of significant changes to United States patent law. These include provisions that affect the way patent applications will be prosecuted and may affect patent litigation. The United States Patent and Trademark Office, or the Patent Office, has developed new and untested regulations and procedures to govern the full implementation of the AIA. Many of the substantive changes to patent law associated with the AIA, and in particular, the first to file provisions, became effective on March 16, 2013. For example, under the AIA, patent rights are awarded to the first inventor to file a patent application with respect to a particular invention. Thus, after March 16, 2013, our ability to protect our patentable intellectual property depends, in part, on our ability to be the first to file patent applications with respect to our inventions. Delay in the filing of a patent application for any purpose, including further development or refinement of an invention, may result in the risk of loss of patent rights. The AIA and its implementation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

The U.S. Supreme Court, or the Court, has also issued decisions for which the full impact is not yet understood. On June 13, 2013, in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. the Court held that claims to isolated genomic DNA were not patentable, but claims to complementary DNA (cDNA) molecules were valid. The effect of the decision on patents for other isolated natural products is uncertain. On March 20, 2012, in Mayo Collaborative Services, DBA Mayo Medical Laboratories, et al. v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., the Court held that several claims drawn to measuring drug metabolite levels from patient samples and

31

Table of Contents

correlating them to drug doses were not patentable subject matter. The decision has created uncertainty around the ability to patent certain biomarker-related method patents. These decisions have increased the uncertainty with regard to our ability to obtain patents in the future as well as the value of current and future patents, once obtained. Depending on decisions by the U.S. federal courts and the Patent Office, the interpretation of laws and regulations governing patents could change in unpredictable ways that would weaken our ability to obtain new patents or to enforce our existing patents, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Challenges to our patent rights can result in costly and time-consuming legal proceedings that may prevent or limit development of imetelstat.*

Our patents may be challenged through administrative or judicial proceedings. Such proceedings are typically lengthy and complex, and an adverse decision can result in the loss of important patent rights. For example, where more than one party seeks U.S. patent protection for the same technology, the Patent Office may declare an interference proceeding in order to ascertain the party to which the patent should be issued. Patent interferences are typically complex, highly contested legal proceedings, subject to appeal. They are usually expensive and prolonged, and can cause significant delay in the issuance of patents. Our pending patent applications, or our issued patents, may be drawn into interference proceedings or be challenged through post-grant review procedures, which may delay or prevent the issuance of patents, or result in the loss of issued patent rights.

Under the AIA, interference proceedings have been eliminated for patent applications filed on or after March 16, 2013, and have been replaced with other types of proceedings, including derivation proceedings. The AIA also includes post-grant review procedures subjecting U.S. patents to post-grant review procedures similar to European oppositions. U.S. patents owned or licensed by us may therefore be subject to post-grant review procedures, as well as other forms of review and re-examination. A decision in such proceedings adverse to our interests could result in the loss of valuable patent rights and negatively impact our business.

Certain jurisdictions, such as Europe, New Zealand and Australia, permit oppositions to be filed against granted patents or patents proposed to be granted. Because our intent is to commercialize imetelstat internationally if approved for commercial sale, securing both proprietary protection and freedom to operate outside of the United States is important to our business. We are involved in both opposing the grant of patents to others through such opposition proceedings and in defending our patent applications against oppositions filed by others.

For example, we have been involved in several patent oppositions before the European Patent Office, or EPO, with a series of companies (GemVax, Pharmexa and KAEL-GemVax) developing GV1001, a cancer vaccine that employs a short telomerase peptide to induce an immune response against telomerase. Pharmexa originally obtained a European patent with broad claims to the use of telomerase vaccines for the treatment of cancer. We opposed that patent and during the opposition proceedings and subsequent appeal the original claims were revoked and, new, narrower claims of the Pharmexa patent were allowed. In February 2010 and in March 2012, GemVax, AS, a company related to KAEL-GemVax, was granted two further related European patents covering its telomerase peptide vaccine, which we also opposed. In March 2013, GemVax, AS amended certain patent claims in these two patents to narrow their scope, and we withdrew our oppositions to GemVax’s patents. On appeal, the Opposition Division, or OD, has approved the amended claims for one patent, and we are waiting for a decision on the other patent.

In addition, we initiated patent opposition proceedings in Europe and Australia related to the stem cell assets that we have divested to Asterias. We are in the process of substituting Asterias in place of Geron as the opponent in these European and Australian proceedings, and Asterias has already been substituted in place of us as a party in the ViaCyte Appeal, which is before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

These proceedings exemplify the time and costs required to protect our intellectual property rights. If we are unable to commit these types of resources for our imetelstat patent rights, we could be prevented or limited in the development of imetelstat, which would have a material adverse effect on our business.

European opposition and appeal proceedings can take several years to reach final decision. The oppositions discussed above reflect the complexity of the patent landscape in which we operate, and illustrate the risks and uncertainties.

As more groups become engaged in scientific research and product development in the areas of telomerase biology, the risk of our patents or patents that we have in-licensed being challenged through patent interferences, derivation proceedings, oppositions, re-examinations, litigation or other means will likely increase. Challenges to our patents through these procedures can be extremely expensive and time-consuming, even if the outcome is favorable to us. An adverse outcome in a patent dispute could severely harm our business by:

· causing us to lose patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction(s);

32

Table of Contents

· subjecting us to litigation, or otherwise preventing us from commercializing imetelstat in the relevant jurisdiction(s);

· requiring us to obtain licenses to the disputed patents;

· forcing us to cease using the disputed technology; or

· requiring us to develop or obtain alternative technologies.

We may be subject to infringement claims that are costly to defend, and which may limit our ability to use disputed technologies and prevent us from pursuing research and development or commercialization of imetelstat.*

Our technologies may infringe the patents or proprietary rights of others. In addition, we may become aware of discoveries and technologies controlled by third parties that are advantageous to developing imetelstat. In the event our technologies infringe the rights of others or we require the use of discoveries and technologies controlled by third parties, we may be prevented from pursuing research, development or commercialization of imetelstat, or may be required to obtain licenses to those patents or other proprietary rights or develop or obtain alternative technologies. We initiate negotiations for licenses to other technologies as the need or opportunity arises. We may not be able to obtain a license to a technology required for the research, development or commercialization of imetelstat on commercially favorable terms, or at all, or our licenses may be terminated on certain grounds, including as a result of our failure to comply with our obligations under such licenses. If we do not obtain a necessary license or if such a license is terminated, we may need to redesign our technologies or obtain rights to alternate technologies, the research and adoption of which could cause delays in our development efforts for imetelstat. In cases where we are unable to license necessary technologies, we could be subject to litigation and prevented from developing imetelstat. Our failure to obtain alternative technologies or a license to any technology that we may require to research, develop or commercialize imetelstat would significantly and negatively affect our business. We expect that as imetelstat continues to progress in development, we will see more efforts by others to obtain patents that are positioned to cover imetelstat. Our success depends significantly on our ability to operate without infringing patents and the proprietary rights of others.

Much of the information and know-how that is critical to our business is not patentable, and we may not be able to prevent others from obtaining this information and establishing competitive enterprises.

We sometimes rely on trade secrets to protect our proprietary technology, especially in circumstances in which we believe patent protection is not appropriate or available. We attempt to protect our proprietary technology in part by confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, collaborators and contractors. We cannot provide assurance that these agreements will not be breached, that we would have adequate remedies for any breach, or that our trade secrets will not otherwise become known or be independently discovered by competitors, any of which would harm our business significantly.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR RELATIONSHIPS WITH THIRD PARTIES

We depend on other parties to help us develop and test imetelstat, and our ability to develop and commercialize imetelstat may be impaired or delayed if collaborations are unsuccessful.*

Our strategy for the development, clinical testing and commercialization of imetelstat requires us to enter into collaborations with clinical research organizations, vendors, clinical trial sites, corporate partners, licensors, licensees and others. We are dependent upon the ability of these parties to perform their responsibilities reliably. By way of example, we have contracted with two clinical research organizations that are primarily responsible for the execution of clinical site related activities for our ongoing imetelstat Phase 2 clinical trials, including clinical trial site monitoring activities. In addition, for our imetelstat program, we have contracted with a single vendor to develop and maintain the clinical database and a single vendor to maintain our safety database. For any future clinical trials of imetelstat that may be conducted by us, we may rely on new or different vendors, or other third parties, with which we may have little or no prior experience.

Accordingly, if the performance of these services is not of the highest quality, or does not achieve necessary regulatory compliance standards, or if such organization or vendor stops or delays its performance for any reason, it would impair and delay our ability to report data from our clinical trials and make the necessary representations to regulatory authorities, if at all. In addition, licensors or licensees could terminate their agreements with us, and we may not receive any development or milestone payments. If we do not achieve milestones or perform diligence obligations set forth in agreements that we have entered into with others, or if our licensors or licensees breach or terminate their agreements with us, our business may be materially harmed.

Our imetelstat development strategy is also dependent on the results of existing and potential future investigator-sponsored trials of imetelstat in hematologic myeloid malignancies, including the Myelofibrosis IST. Because investigator-sponsored trials are not

33

Table of Contents

Geron-sponsored trials, the clinical testing of imetelstat in investigator-sponsored trials requires us to rely on the applicable investigator’s design and conduct of the trial, which we do not control, and it is possible that the FDA or other regulatory agencies will not view these investigator-sponsored trials, including the Myelofibrosis IST, as providing adequate support for future clinical trials, whether controlled by us or third parties, for any one or more reasons, including elements of the design or execution of these investigator-sponsored trials or safety concerns or other trial results. Accordingly, failure by physician investigators to properly design or conduct existing or potential future investigator-sponsored trials of imetelstat could produce results that might delay or prevent us from advancing imetelstat into further clinical development. In addition, we do not have control over the timing and reporting of the data from the Myelofibrosis IST or any other investigator-sponsored trials, nor do we own the data from the trials. Our arrangements with investigators may provide us certain information rights with respect to the trials, including access to and the ability to use and reference the data, including for our own regulatory filings, resulting from the trials. If these obligations are breached by the investigators, or if the data prove to be inadequate compared to the first-hand knowledge we might have gained had the trials been Geron-sponsored clinical trials, or if the data cannot be audited or verified by us, then our ability to design and conduct any Geron-sponsored clinical trials may be adversely affected. Additionally, the FDA or other regulatory agencies may disagree with the sufficiency of our right of reference to the preclinical, manufacturing, or clinical data generated by any investigator-sponsored trials, or our interpretation of preclinical, manufacturing, or clinical data from these investigator-sponsored trials. If so, the FDA or other regulatory agencies may require us to obtain and submit additional preclinical, manufacturing, or clinical data before we may initiate potential future Geron-sponsored clinical trials of imetelstat and/or may not accept such additional data as adequate to initiate any such Geron-sponsored clinical trials. Further, if we are unable to verify, confirm or replicate the results from the Myelofibrosis IST or if negative results are obtained, we would likely be further delayed or prevented from advancing imetelstat into further clinical development and might decide to discontinue our development of imetelstat, which would severely harm our business and prospects, and could potentially cause us to cease operations.

Our ability to manufacture imetelstat is uncertain because we must rely on third parties for manufacturing.*

We rely on other companies for certain process development, supply of starting materials, manufacturing or other technical and scientific work with respect to imetelstat, but we do not have direct control over their personnel or operations. We rely on these manufacturers to produce and deliver sufficient quantities of imetelstat to support our clinical trials, including investigator-sponsored clinical trials, on a timely basis and to comply with applicable regulatory requirements. If these companies do not perform the work which they are contracted to perform, do not complete the work within the expected timelines, or if they fail to produce materials which are suitable for use in clinical trials or choose to exit the business, our ability to develop or manufacture imetelstat could be significantly harmed. For example, we may need to change one or more of our suppliers due to these or other reasons and the change could lead to delays in drug supply. Manufacturing delays could adversely impact the initiation or completion of ongoing or future clinical trials, including investigator-sponsored trials.

In addition, our manufacturers may need to make substantial investments to enable sufficient capacity increases and cost reductions, and to implement those regulatory and compliance standards necessary for successful Phase 3 trials and commercial production. Our manufacturers may not be able to achieve such capacity increases, cost reductions, or regulatory and compliance standards, and even if they do, such achievements may not be at a commercially reasonable cost to us. We have not established long-term manufacturing commitments, and changing manufacturers may be prolonged and difficult due to inherent technical complexities, and because the number of potential manufacturers is limited. It may be difficult or impossible for us to find a replacement manufacturer on acceptable terms, or at all.

There are other risks and uncertainties that we face with respect to manufacturing. For example, we currently have an agreement with only a single contractor for distribution of imetelstat final drug product to clinical sites in North America. As another example, certain commonly used reagents and solvents may experience market shortages and, if these shortages occur, they may adversely impact our ability to manufacture imetelstat.

Our reliance on investigators, consultants, research institutions, and scientific contractors whose activities are not wholly within our control may lead to delays in development of imetelstat.*

We rely extensively upon and have relationships with investigators, scientific consultants, collaborators, and contractors at academic, commercial and other institutions. Some of the investigators, scientific consultants, collaborators and contractors upon whom we rely conduct research and development activities at our request or initiate investigator-sponsored clinical trials to test imetelstat, and others assist us in formulating and/or executing our research and development and clinical and regulatory strategy or other matters related to imetelstat. These investigators, scientific consultants, collaborators and contractors are not our employees and may have commitments to, or consulting or advisory contracts with, other entities that may limit their availability to us. We have limited control over the activities of these investigators, scientific consultants, collaborators and contractors and, except as otherwise required by our collaboration and consulting agreements, can expect only limited amounts of their time to be dedicated to our activities. If any of these third parties are unable or refuse to contribute to projects on which we need their help, our ability to generate advances in our technologies and develop imetelstat could be significantly harmed.

34

Table of Contents

RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMON STOCK AND FINANCIAL REPORTING

Historically, our stock price has been extremely volatile.*

Historically, our stock price has been extremely volatile. Between October 1, 2003 and September 30, 2013, our stock has traded as high as $16.80 per share and as low as $0.91 per share. Between October 1, 2010 and September 30, 2013, the price has ranged between a high of $6.40 per share and a low of $0.91 per share. The significant market price fluctuations of our common stock have been due to and may in the future be influenced by a variety of factors, including:

· announcements regarding our clinical trial results or delays in any future clinical trials of imetelstat, or announcements regarding the results of or delays in investigator-sponsored trials of imetelstat, and investor perceptions thereof;

· announcements regarding the safety of imetelstat;

· announcements regarding our plans to discontinue certain programs or clinical trials, such as our prior announcements regarding the discontinuation of our stem cell programs and certain clinical trials;

· announcements regarding our research and development of imetelstat;

· our ability to complete the Asterias Series A common stock distribution and perception by our stockholders about the adequacy of the consideration received for the divestiture of our stem cell assets to Asterias;

· the demand in the market for our common stock;

· the experimental nature of imetelstat;

· fluctuations in our operating results;

· our declining cash balance as a result of operating losses;

· market conditions relating to the biopharmaceutical and pharmaceutical industries;

· announcements of technological innovations, new commercial products, or clinical progress or lack thereof by us, our collaborative partners or our competitors;

· announcements concerning regulatory developments, developments with respect to proprietary rights and our collaborations;

· comments by securities analysts;

· large stockholders exiting their position in our common stock;

· general market conditions;

· the issuance of common stock to partners, vendors or to investors to raise additional capital; and

· the occurrence of any other risks and uncertainties discussed in this Item 1A, “Risk Factors”.

Stock prices and trading volumes for many biopharmaceutical companies fluctuate widely for a number of reasons, including factors which may be unrelated to their businesses or results of operations, such as media coverage, legislative and regulatory measures and the activities of various interest groups or organizations. In addition to other risk factors described in this section, overall market volatility, as well as general domestic or international economic, market and political conditions, could materially and adversely affect the market price of our common stock and the return on your investment.

35

Table of Contents

If we fail to meet continued listing standards of NASDAQ, our common stock may be delisted, which could have a material adverse effect on the liquidity of our common stock.

Our common stock is currently traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market. The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC has requirements that a company must meet in order to remain listed on NASDAQ. In particular, NASDAQ rules require us to maintain a minimum bid price of $1.00 per share of our common stock. If the closing bid price of our common stock were to fall below $1.00 per share for 30 consecutive trading days or we do not meet other listing requirements, we would fail to be in compliance with NASDAQ’s listing standards. There can be no assurance that we will continue to meet the minimum bid price requirement, or any other requirement in the future. If we fail to meet the minimum bid price requirement, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC may initiate the delisting process with a notification letter. If we were to receive such a notification, we would be afforded a grace period of 180 calendar days to regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement. In order to regain compliance, shares of our common stock would need to maintain a minimum closing bid price of at least $1.00 per share for a minimum of 10 consecutive trading days. If our common stock were to be delisted, the liquidity of our common stock would be adversely affected and the market price of our common stock could decrease.

We may be subject to litigation that will be costly to defend or pursue and uncertain in its outcome.*

Securities-related class action litigation has often been brought against companies, including many biotechnology companies, which experience volatility in the market price of their securities. This risk is especially relevant for us because biotechnology and biopharmaceutical companies often experience significant stock price volatility in connection with their product development programs. If the results of our business activities are not successful, including without limitation, if:

· the final or any preliminary results from the Myelofibrosis IST, or any subsequent clinical trial of imetelstat, are not deemed to be successful;

· we or any investigators ascertain that the use of imetelstat results in significant systemic or organ toxicities or other safety issues resulting in an unacceptable benefit-risk profile;

· we or any investigators discontinue the further development of imetelstat; or

· our stockholders believe the consideration received from the divestiture of our stem cell assets to be inadequate;

our stock price would likely decline, and may result in litigation. A decision adverse to our interests in any such lawsuit could result in the payment of substantial damages by us, and could have a material adverse effect on our cash flow, results of operations and financial position.

Our business may bring us into conflict with our licensees, licensors, or others with whom we have contractual or other business relationships, or with our competitors or others whose interests differ from ours. If we are unable to resolve those conflicts on terms that are satisfactory to all parties, we may become involved in litigation brought by or against us. In addition, the conduct of clinical trials, including our ongoing and any subsequent clinical trials of imetelstat and any investigator-sponsored trials, are inherently risky and may expose us to liability for matters such as patient injury or death, or for any failure to meet regulatory and compliance requirements. Monitoring, initiating and defending against legal actions are time-consuming for our management, are likely to be expensive and may detract from our ability to fully focus our internal resources on our business activities. The outcome of litigation is always uncertain, and in some cases could include judgments against us that require us to pay damages, enjoin us from certain activities, or otherwise affect our legal or contractual rights, which could have a significant adverse effect on our business. In addition, the inherent uncertainty of such litigation could lead to increased volatility in our stock price and a decrease in the value of your investment in our common stock.

The sale of a substantial number of shares may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

The sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that such sales could occur, could significantly and negatively affect the market price of our common stock. As of September 30, 2013, we had 300,000,000 shares of common stock authorized for issuance and 128,949,459 shares of common stock outstanding. In addition, as of September 30, 2013, we had reserved approximately 35,394,635 shares of common stock for future issuance pursuant to our option and equity incentive plans and outstanding warrants. Issuing additional shares could negatively affect the market price of our common stock and the return on your investment.

Future sales of our common stock, including pursuant to our At-The-Market Issuance Sales Agreement with MLV & Co. LLC, or the issuance of common stock to satisfy our current or future cash payment obligations or to acquire technology, property, or other

36

Table of Contents

businesses, could cause immediate dilution and adversely affect the market price of our common stock. In addition, under the universal shelf registration statement filed by us in July 2012 and declared effective by the SEC in October 2012, we may sell any combination of common stock, preferred stock, debt securities and warrants in one or more offerings, up to a cumulative value of $200 million. The sale or issuance of our securities, as well as the existence of outstanding options and shares of common stock reserved for issuance under our option and equity incentive plans and outstanding warrants also may adversely affect the terms upon which we are able to obtain additional capital through the sale of equity securities.

Our undesignated preferred stock may inhibit potential acquisition bids; this may adversely affect the market price of our common stock and the voting rights of holders of our common stock.

Our certificate of incorporation provides our Board of Directors with the authority to issue up to 3,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock and to determine or alter the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions granted to or imported upon these shares without further vote or action by our stockholders. The issuance of shares of preferred stock may delay or prevent a change in control transaction without further action by our stockholders. As a result, the market price of our common stock may be adversely affected.

In addition, if we issue preferred stock in the future that has preference over our common stock with respect to the payment of dividends or upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, or if we issue preferred stock with voting rights that dilute the voting power of our common stock, the rights of holders of our common stock or the market price of our common stock could be adversely affected.

Provisions in our charter, bylaws and Delaware law may inhibit potential acquisition bids for us, which may prevent holders of our common stock from benefiting from what they believe may be the positive aspects of acquisitions and takeovers.

Provisions of our charter documents and bylaws may make it substantially more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us and may prevent changes in our management, including provisions that:

· prevent stockholders from taking actions by written consent;

· divide the Board of Directors into separate classes with terms of office that are structured to prevent all of the directors from being elected in any one year; and

· set forth procedures for nominating directors and submitting proposals for consideration at stockholders’ meetings.

Provisions of Delaware law may also inhibit potential acquisition bids for us or prevent us from engaging in business combinations. In addition, we have severance agreements with several employees and a severance plan which could require an acquiror to pay a higher price. Either collectively or individually, these provisions may prevent holders of our common stock from benefiting from what they may believe are the positive aspects of acquisitions and takeovers, including the potential realization of a higher rate of return on their investment from these types of transactions.

We do not intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Any payment of cash dividends will depend upon our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements and other factors and will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors.

Failure to achieve and maintain effective internal controls in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 could have a material adverse effect on our business and stock price.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or Section 404, requires that we establish and maintain an adequate internal control structure and procedures for financial reporting. Our annual reports on Form 10-K must contain an assessment by management of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and must include disclosure of any material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting that we have identified. In addition, our independent registered public accounting firm must annually provide an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.

The requirements of Section 404 are ongoing and also apply to future years. We expect that our internal control over financial reporting will continue to evolve as our business develops. Although we are committed to continue to improve our internal control processes and we will continue to diligently and vigorously review our internal control over financial reporting in order to ensure compliance with Section 404 requirements, any control system, regardless of how well designed, operated and evaluated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that its objectives will be met. Therefore, we cannot be certain that in the future material

37

Table of Contents

weaknesses or significant deficiencies will not exist or otherwise be discovered. If material weaknesses or other significant deficiencies occur, these weaknesses or deficiencies could result in misstatements of our results of operations, restatements of our consolidated financial statements, a decline in our stock price, or other material adverse effects on our business, reputation, results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.

RISKS RELATED TO COMPETITIVE FACTORS

The loss of key personnel could slow our ability to conduct research and develop imetelstat.*

Our future success depends to a significant extent on the skills, experience and efforts of our executive officers and key members of our clinical and scientific staff. We face intense competition for qualified individuals from numerous pharmaceutical, biopharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, as well as academic and other research institutions. The recent restructurings we implemented could have an adverse impact on our ability to retain and recruit qualified personnel or we may incur unanticipated inefficiencies caused by our reduced personnel resources. We may be unable to retain our current personnel or attract or assimilate other highly qualified management and scientific personnel in the future on acceptable terms. The loss of any or all of these individuals could harm our business and might significantly delay or prevent the achievement of research, development or business objectives.

Some of our competitors may develop technologies that are superior to or more cost-effective than ours, which may significantly impact the commercial viability of our technologies and damage our ability to sustain operations.*

The pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries are intensely competitive. Other pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and research organizations currently engage in or have in the past engaged in efforts related to the biological mechanisms that are the focus of our imetelstat program, including the study of telomeres, telomerase and our proprietary oligonucleotide chemistry. In addition, other products and therapies that could directly compete with imetelstat currently exist or are being developed by pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical companies and by academic and other research organizations.

Many companies are developing alternative therapies to treat cancer and, in this regard, are competitors of ours. There are more than 200 approved anti-cancer products on the market in the United States, and several thousand in clinical development. Many of the pharmaceutical companies developing and marketing these competing products (e.g. Sanofi, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Novartis AG, Incyte Corporation and Gilead Sciences, Inc.) have significantly greater financial resources and expertise than we do in:

· research and development;

· manufacturing;

· preclinical and clinical testing;

· obtaining regulatory approvals; and

· marketing, sales and distribution.

Smaller companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. Academic institutions, government agencies and other public and private research organizations may also conduct research, seek patent protection and establish collaborative arrangements for research, clinical development and marketing of products similar to ours. These companies and institutions compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to our imetelstat program.

In addition to the above factors, we expect to face competition in the following areas:

· product efficacy and safety;

· the timing and scope of regulatory consents;

· availability of resources;

· reimbursement coverage;

38

Table of Contents

· price; and

· patent position, including potentially dominant patent positions of others.

As a result of the foregoing, our competitors may develop more effective or more affordable products, or achieve earlier patent protection or product commercialization than us. Most significantly, competitive products may render imetelstat obsolete, which would negatively impact our business and ability to sustain operations.

To be successful, imetelstat must be accepted by the health care community, which can be very slow to adopt or unreceptive to new technologies and products.*

If approved for marketing, imetelstat may not achieve market acceptance since hospitals, physicians, patients or the medical community in general may decide not to accept and utilize imetelstat. If approved for commercial sale, imetelstat will compete with a number of conventional drugs and therapies manufactured and marketed by major pharmaceutical companies. The degree of market acceptance of imetelstat will depend on a number of factors, including:

· our establishment and demonstration to the medical community of the clinical efficacy and safety of imetelstat;

· our ability to demonstrate that imetelstat is superior to alternatives currently on the market;

· our ability to establish in the medical community the potential advantage of imetelstat over alternative treatment methods;

· the label and promotional claims allowed by the FDA or other regulatory agencies for imetelstat, if any;

· sales, marketing and distribution support for imetelstat; and

· reimbursement policies of government and third-party payers.

If the health care community does not accept imetelstat for any of the foregoing reasons, or for any other reason, our business would be materially harmed.

If we fail to obtain acceptable prices or adequate reimbursement for imetelstat, the use of imetelstat could be severely limited.

Our ability to successfully commercialize imetelstat will depend significantly on our ability to obtain acceptable prices and the availability of reimbursement to the patient from third-party payers. In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordability Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act (collectively, the PPACA) became law. In June 2012, the United States Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of key provisions of the PPACA. The PPACA contains numerous initiatives that impact the pharmaceutical industry. These include, among other things:

· increasing existing price rebates in federally funded health care programs;

· expanding rebates, or other pharmaceutical company discounts, into new programs;

· imposing a new non-deductible excise tax on sales of certain prescription pharmaceutical products by prescription drug manufacturers and importers;

· reducing incentives for employer-sponsored health care;

· creating an independent commission to propose changes to Medicare with a particular focus on the cost of biopharmaceuticals in Medicare Part D;

· providing a government-run public option with biopharmaceutical price-setting capabilities;

· allowing the Secretary of Health and Human Services to negotiate drug prices within Medicare Part D directly with pharmaceutical manufacturers;

· reducing the number of years of data exclusivity for innovative biological products potentially leading to earlier biosimilar competition; and

· increasing oversight by the FDA of pharmaceutical research and development processes and commercialization tactics.

39

Table of Contents

While the PPACA may increase the number of patients who have insurance coverage for imetelstat, its cost containment measures could also adversely affect reimbursement for imetelstat. Cost control initiatives could decrease the price that we receive for imetelstat in the future. If imetelstat is not considered cost-effective or if we fail to generate adequate third-party reimbursement for the users of imetelstat, then we may be unable to maintain price levels sufficient to realize an appropriate return on our investment for imetelstat, which could have an adverse impact on our business.

RISKS RELATED TO ENVIRONMENTAL AND PRODUCT LIABILITY

Our activities involve hazardous materials, and improper handling of these materials by our employees, contractors, or agents could expose us to significant legal and financial penalties.*

If we are unable to comply with federal, state and county environmental and safety laws and regulations, including those governing laboratory procedures, exposure to blood-borne pathogens and the handling of biohazardous materials, chemicals and various radioactive compounds previously used by us in our discontinued research facility, we could be subject to considerable additional cost or liability that would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition. We, our contractors or agents may be required to incur significant costs to comply with current or future environmental laws and regulations and may be adversely affected by the cost of compliance with these laws and regulations.

Although we believe that the safety procedures previously used by us for using, handling, storing and disposing of hazardous materials in our discontinued research facility complied with the standards prescribed by state and federal regulations, we may incur significant unanticipated costs associated with the closure and exit of our research facility. Further, any failure by us to control the use, disposal, removal or storage, or to adequately restrict the discharge, or assist in the clean up, of hazardous chemicals or hazardous, infectious or toxic substances in connection with the closure of our research facility could subject us to significant liabilities, including joint and several liability under certain statutes. Any such liability or costs could exceed our resources and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, an accident could damage the manufacturing facilities and operations of any third party contracted by us to perform services with respect to our imetelstat program. Additional federal, state and local laws and regulations affecting us may be adopted in the future. We, our contractors and agents may incur substantial costs to comply with these laws and regulations and substantial fines or penalties if we violate any of these laws or regulations, which would adversely affect our business.

We may not be able to obtain or maintain sufficient insurance on commercially reasonable terms or with adequate coverage against potential liabilities in order to protect ourselves against product liability claims.*

Our business exposes us to potential product liability risks that are inherent in the testing, manufacturing and marketing of human therapeutic and diagnostic products. We may become subject to product liability claims if the use of imetelstat, or GRN1005 in our discontinued trials, is alleged to have injured patients. We currently have limited clinical trial liability insurance and we may not be able to maintain this type of insurance for any of our clinical trials. In addition, product liability insurance is becoming increasingly expensive. Being unable to obtain or maintain product liability insurance in the future on acceptable terms or with adequate coverage against potential liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our headquarters are located near known earthquake fault zones, and the occurrence of an earthquake or other catastrophic disaster could cause damage to our offices and equipment, which could cause delays or even require us to cease or curtail operations.*

Our headquarters are located in the San Francisco Bay Area near known earthquake fault zones and are vulnerable to significant damage from earthquakes. We do not carry earthquake insurance. We are also vulnerable to damage from other types of disasters, including fires, floods, power loss, communications failures, terrorism and similar events. If any disaster were to occur, our ability to operate our business at our office would be seriously, or potentially completely, impaired. The insurance we maintain may not be adequate to cover our losses from such disasters or other business interruptions.

40

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

See Exhibit Index.

41

Table of Contents

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

| GERON CORPORATION
Date: November 7, 2013 | By: | /s/ OLIVIA K. BLOOM
|  | OLIVIA K. BLOOM
|  | Senior Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

42

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

|  |  |  | Incorporation by Reference
Exhibit |  |  |  | Exhibit |  |  |  | Filing |  |
Number |  | Description |  | Number |  | Filing |  | Date |  | File No.
10.1 |  | First Amendment to Employment Agreement between Geron Corporation and Melissa A. Kelly Behrs, effective as of September 24, 2013* |  | 10.1 |  | 8-K |  | September 27, 2013 |  | 000-20859
10.2 |  | First Amendment to Employment Agreement between Geron Corporation and Olivia K. Bloom, effective as of September 24, 2013* |  | 10.2 |  | 8-K |  | September 27, 2013 |  | 000-20859
10.3 |  | First Amendment to Employment Agreement between Geron Corporation and Craig C. Parker, effective as of September 24, 2013* |  | 10.3 |  | 8-K |  | September 27, 2013 |  | 000-20859
10.4 |  | First Amendment to Employment Agreement between Geron Corporation and Stephen N. Rosenfield, effective as of September 24, 2013* |  | 10.4 |  | 8-K |  | September 27, 2013 |  | 000-20859
10.5 |  | Amended and Restated 2006 Directors’ Stock Option Plan* |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
31.1 |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Form of Rule 13a-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 7, 2013 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
31.2 |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Form of Rule 13a-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 7, 2013 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
32.1 |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 7, 2013 ** |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
32.2 |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 7, 2013 ** |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
101 |  | The following materials from the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) include: (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, and (v) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |

* |  | Management contract or compensation plan or arrangement.
** |  | The certifications attached as Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 that accompany this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, are not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

43